Impact of labor induction,gestational age,and maternal age on cesarean delivery rates

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the impact of labor induction and maternal age on cesarean delivery rates in nulliparous and multiparous women between 36 and 42 weeks' gestation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study on 14,409 women delivering at two teaching hospitals in metropolitan Boston during 1998 and 1999. Women who had contraindications to labor, including a prior cesarean delivery, were excluded. The risks for cesarean delivery by induction status, gestational age by completed week between 36 and 42 weeks, maternal age <35, 35-39, and >/=40 years, and stratified by parity, were calculated by logistic regression. RESULTS: In nulliparas, labor induction was associated with an increase in cesarean delivery from 13.7% to 24.7% (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48, 1.95]). In multiparas, induction was associated with an increase from 2.4% to 4.5% (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.10, 2.00). Other variables that placed a nulliparous woman at increased risk for cesarean delivery included maternal age of at least 35 years and gestational ages over 40 weeks. For multiparas, only maternal age 40 years or older and gestational age of 41 weeks were associated with an increase in cesarean deliveries. CONCLUSION: Induction of labor, older maternal age, and gestational age over 40 weeks each independently increase the risk for cesarean delivery in both nulliparous and multiparous women. Although the relative risk from induction is similar in nulliparas and multiparas, the absolute magnitude of the increase is much greater in nulliparas (11% versus 2.1%).     

Blood transfusion and cesarean delivery

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate risks for intraoperative or postoperative packed red blood cell transfusion in women who underwent cesarean delivery. METHODS: This was a 19-university prospective observational study. All primary cesarean deliveries from January 1, 1999, to December 31, 2000, and all repeat cesareans from January 1, 1999, to December 31, 2002, were included. Trained, certified research nurses performed systematic data abstraction. Primary and repeat cesarean deliveries were analyzed separately. Univariable analyses were used to inform multivariable analyses. RESULTS: A total of 23,486 women underwent primary cesarean delivery, of whom 762 (3.2%) were transfused (median 2 units, 25th% to 75th% 2-3 units). A total of 33,683 women underwent repeat [corrected] cesarean delivery, and 735 (2.2%) were transfused (median 2 units, 25th% to 75th% 2-4 units). Among primary cesareans, general anesthesia (odds ratio [OR] 4.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.5-5.0), placenta previa (OR 4.8, CI 3.5-6.5) and severe (hematocrit less than 25%) preoperative anemia (OR 17.0, CI 12.4-23.3) increased the odds of transfusion. Among repeat cesareans, the risk was increased by general anesthesia (OR 7.2, CI 5.9-8.7), a history of five or more prior cesareans (OR 7.6, CI 4.0-14.3), placenta previa (OR 15.9, CI 12.0-21.0), and severe preoperative anemia (OR 19.9, CI 14.5-27.2). CONCLUSION: Overall, the risk of transfusion in association with cesarean is low. However, both severe preoperative maternal anemia and placenta previa are associated with markedly increased risks. The former argues for optimizing maternal antenatal iron status to avoid severe anemia and the latter for careful perioperative planning when previa complicates cesarean. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.     

Abnormal placentation: twenty-year analysis

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine whether the rate of abnormal placentation is increasing in conjunction with the cesarean rate and to evaluate incidence, risk factors, and outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Cases from 1982-2002 were identified by histopathologic or strong clinical criteria. Risk factors were assessed in a matched case-control study, and analyzed using conditional logistic regression models. RESULTS: There were 64,359 deliveries, with cesarean rates increasing from 12.5% (1982) to 23.5% (2002). The overall incidence of placenta accreta was 1 in 533. Significant risk factors for placenta accreta in our final analysis included advancing maternal age (odds ratio [OR] 1.13, 95% CI 1.089-1.194, P < .0001), 2 or more cesarean deliveries (OR 8.6, 95% CI 3.536-21.078, P < .0001), and previa (OR 51.4, 95% CI: 10.646-248.390, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: The rate of placenta accreta increased in conjunction with cesarean deliveries; the most important risk factors were previous cesarean delivery, previa, and advanced maternal age.     

Pregnancy outcomes for women with placenta previa in relation to the number of prior cesarean deliveries

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the association between the number of prior cesarean deliveries and pregnancy outcomes among women with placenta previa. METHODS: Women with a placenta previa and a singleton gestation were identified in a concurrently collected database of cesarean deliveries performed at 19 academic centers during a 4-year period. Maternal and perinatal outcomes were analyzed after stratifying by the number of cesarean deliveries before the index pregnancy. RESULTS: Of the 868 women in the analysis, 488 had no prior cesarean delivery, 252 had one prior cesarean delivery, 76 had two prior cesarean deliveries, and 52 had at least three prior cesarean deliveries. Multiple measures of maternal morbidity (eg, coagulopathy, hysterectomy, pulmonary edema) increased in frequency as the number of prior cesarean deliveries rose. Even one prior cesarean delivery was sufficient to increase the risk of an adverse maternal outcome (a composite of transfusion, hysterectomy, operative injury, coagulopathy, venous thromboembolism, pulmonary edema, or death) from 15% to 23%, which corresponded, in multivariable analysis, to an adjusted odds ratio of 1.9 (95% confidence interval 1.2-2.9). Conversely, gestational age at delivery and adverse perinatal outcome (a composite measure of respiratory distress syndrome, necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage grade 3 or 4, seizures, or death) were unrelated to the number of prior cesarean deliveries. CONCLUSION: Among women with a placenta previa, an increasing number of prior cesarean deliveries is associated with increasing maternal, but not perinatal, morbidity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.     

Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option?

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to compare clinical outcomes in women with 1 versus 2 prior cesarean deliveries who attempt vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (VBAC) and also to compare clinical outcomes of women with 2 prior cesarean deliveries who attempt VBAC or opt for a repeat cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort study, in which the medical records of more than 25,000 women with a prior cesarean delivery from 16 community and tertiary care hospitals were reviewed by trained nurse abstractors. Information on demographics, obstetric history, medical and social history, and the outcomes of the index pregnancy was obtained. Comparisons of obstetric outcomes were made between women with 1 versus 2 prior cesarean deliveries, and also between women with 2 prior cesarean deliveries who opt for VBAC attempt versus elective repeat cesarean delivery. Both bivariate and multivariate techniques were used for these comparisons. RESULTS: The records of 20,175 women with one previous cesarean section and 3,970 with 2 prior cesarean sections were reviewed. The rate of VBAC success was similar in women with a single prior cesarean delivery (75.5%) compared with those with 2 prior cesarean deliveries (74.6%), though the odds of major morbidity were higher in those with 2 prior cesarean deliveries (adjusted odd ratio[OR] = 1.61 95% CI 1.11-2.33). Among women with 2 prior cesarean deliveries, those who opt for a VBAC attempt had higher odds of major complications compared with those who opt for elective repeat cesarean delivery (adjusted OR = 2.26, 95% CI 1.17-4.37). CONCLUSION: The likelihood of major complications is higher with a VBAC attempt in women with 2 prior cesarean deliveries compared with those with a single prior cesarean delivery. In women with 2 prior cesarean deliveries, while major complications are increased in those who attempt VBAC relative to elective repeat cesarean delivery, the absolute risk of major complications remains low.     

Previous cesarean section and abortion as risk factors for developing placenta previa.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk of subsequent occurrence of placenta previa in women with a history of previous cesarean sections and/or spontaneous and induced abortions. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all single gestation deliveries at National University Hospital of Singapore from 1993-1997 was done. Women with placenta previa were identified by clinical or ultrasonographic diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the 16,169 singleton deliveries, 164 women (1.0%) had placenta previa. Women with placenta previa had a significantly higher incidence of previous cesarean sections (p < 0.001). Among the 164 women with placenta previa, women with 1, 2, and 3 previous cesarean sections had 2.2 (95% CI 1.4, 3.4), 4.1 (95% CI 1.9, 8.8) and 22.4 (95% CI 6.4, 78.3) times increased risk of developing placenta previa respectively. Similarly, women with 2 or more previous abortions had a 2.1 (95% CI 1.2, 3.5) times increased risk of subsequently developing placenta previa. CONCLUSION: There is a strong association between previous cesarean section and risk of subsequent development of placenta previa. This risk increased with the number of previous cesarean sections. Increasing frequency of abortions was also found to predispose a woman to placenta previa.     

Placenta previa: obstetric risk factors and pregnancy outcome

Objective: To determine the incidence, obstetric risk factors and perinatal outcome of placenta previa. Study design: All singleton deliveries at our institution between 1990 and 1998 complicated with placenta previa were compared with those without placenta previa. Results: Placenta previa complicated 0.38% ( n = 298) of all singleton deliveries ( n = 78 524). A back-step multiple logistic regression model found the following factors to be independently correlated with the occurrence of placenta previa: maternal age above 40 years (OR 3.1, 95% CI 2.0-4.9), infertility treatments (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.8-5.6), a previous Cesarean section (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.4), a history of habitual abortions (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.3-2.7) and Jewish ethnicity (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.8). Pregnancies complicated with placenta previa had significantly higher rates of second-trimester bleeding (OR 156.0, 95% CI 87.2-277.5), pathological presentations (OR 7.6, 95% CI 5.7-10.1), abruptio placentae (OR 13.1, 95% CI 8.2-20.7), congenital malformations (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.5-4.2), perinatal mortality (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.1-5.6), Cesarean delivery (OR 57.4, 95% CI 40.7-81.4), Apgar scores at 5 min lower than 7 (OR 4.4, 95% CI 2.3-8.3), placenta accreta (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.1-9.9) postpartum hemorrhage (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.2-10.5), postpartum anemia (OR 5.5, 95% CI 4.4-6.9) and delayed maternal and infant discharge from the hospital (OR 10.9, 95% CI 7.3-16.1) as compared to pregnancies without placenta previa. In a multivariable analysis investigating risk factors for perinatal mortality, the following were found to be independent significant factors: congenital malformations, placental abruption, pathological presentations and preterm delivery. In contrast, placenta previa and Cesarean section were found to be protective factors against the occurrence of perinatal mortality while controlling for confounders. Conclusion: Although an abnormal implantation per se was not an independent risk factor for perinatal mortality, placenta previa should be considered as a marker for possible obstetric complications. Hence, the detection of placenta previa should encourage a careful evaluation with timely delivery in order to reduce the associated maternal and perinatal complications.     

Placenta previa: obstetric risk factors and pregnancy outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence, obstetric risk factors and perinatal outcome of placenta previa. STUDY DESIGN: All singleton deliveries at our institution between 1990 and 1998 complicated with placenta previa were compared with those without placenta previa. RESULTS: Placenta previa complicated 0.38% (n = 298) of all singleton deliveries (n = 78 524). A back-step multiple logistic regression model found the following factors to be independently correlated with the occurrence of placenta previa: maternal age above 40 years (OR 3.1, 95% CI 2.0-4.9), infertility treatments (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.8-5.6), a previous Cesarean section (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.4), a history of habitual abortions (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.3-2.7) and Jewish ethnicity (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.8). Pregnancies complicated with placenta previa had significantly higher rates of second-trimester bleeding (OR 156.0, 95% CI 87.2-277.5), pathological presentations (OR 7.6, 95% CI 5.7-10.1), abruptio placentae (OR 13.1, 95% CI 8.2-20.7), congenital malformations (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.5-4.2), perinatal mortality (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.1-5.6), Cesarean delivery (OR 57.4, 95% CI 40.7-81.4), Apgar scores at 5 min lower than 7 (OR 4.4, 95% CI 2.3-8.3), placenta accreta (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.1-9.9) postpartum hemorrhage (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.2-10.5), postpartum anemia (OR 5.5, 95% CI 4.4-6.9) and delayed maternal and infant discharge from the hospital (OR 10.9, 95% CI 7.3-16.1) as compared to pregnancies without placenta previa. In a multivariable analysis investigating risk factors for perinatal mortality, the following were found to be independent significant factors: congenital malformations, placental abruption, pathological presentations and preterm delivery. In contrast, placenta previa and Cesarean section were found to be protective factors against the occurrence of perinatal mortality while controlling for confounders. CONCLUSION: Although an abnormal implantation per se was not an independent risk factor for perinatal mortality, placenta previa should be considered as a marker for possible obstetric complications. Hence, the detection of placenta previa should encourage a careful evaluation with timely delivery in order to reduce the associated maternal and perinatal complications.     

Cesarean delivery and peripartum hysterectomy

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the national incidence of peripartum hysterectomy and quantify the risk associated with cesarean deliveries and other factors. METHODS: A population-based, matched case-control study using the United Kingdom Obstetric Surveillance System, including 318 women in the United Kingdom who underwent peripartum hysterectomy between February 2005 and February 2006 and 614 matched control women. RESULTS: The incidence of peripartum hysterectomy was 4.1 cases per 10,000 births (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6-4.5). Maternal mortality was 0.6% (95% CI 0-1.5%). Previous cesarean delivery (odds ratio [OR] 3.52, 95% CI 2.35-5.26), maternal age over 35 years (OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.66-3.58), parity of three or greater (OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.26-4.18), previous manual placental removal (OR 12.5, 95% CI 1.17-133.0), previous myomectomy (OR 14.0, 95% CI 1.31-149.3), and twin pregnancy (OR 6.30, 95% CI 1.73-23.0) were all risk factors for peripartum hysterectomy. The risk associated with previous cesarean delivery was higher with increasing numbers of previous cesarean deliveries (OR 2.14 with one previous delivery [95% CI 1.37-3.33], 18.6 with two or more [95% CI 7.67-45.4]). Women undergoing a first cesarean delivery in the current pregnancy were also at increased risk (OR 7.13, 95% CI 3.71-13.7). CONCLUSION: Peripartum hysterectomy is strongly associated with previous cesarean delivery, and the risk rises with increasing number of previous cesarean deliveries, maternal age over 35 years, and parity greater than 3. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.     

Risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage requiring transfusion in cesarean deliveries for Japanese twins: comparison with those for singletons

Objective

The aim of this study was to identify the factors associated with the increased risk of postpartum hemorrhage requiring transfusion in Japanese twin pregnancies in comparison with those in Japanese singleton pregnancies.

Methods

We reviewed the obstetric records of all singleton and twin deliveries after 22?weeks’ gestation at the Japanese Red Cross Katsushika Maternity Hospital from 2003 through 2011. Potential risk factors for transfusion due to hemorrhage after cesarean delivery were selected according to previous studies of postpartum hemorrhage or transfusion or both after delivery: maternal age, parity, previous cesarean deliveries, history of infertility therapies such as in vitro fertilization, gestational age at delivery, neonatal birth weight, placenta previa, uterine myoma ≥6?cm, hypertensive disorders, placental abruption, emergency cesarean deliveries and general anesthesia.

Results

Using multiple logistic regression, the independent risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage requiring transfusion in singleton pregnancies were preterm delivery [odds ratio (OR) 2.40, 95?% confidence interval (CI) 1.2–4.6, p?<?0.01], placenta previa (OR 8.08, 95?% CI 3.9–16, p?<?0.01) and placental abruption (OR 12.8, 95?% CI 2.3–76, p?<?0.01). In twin pregnancies, however, the independent risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage requiring transfusion were gestational age at ≥41?weeks (OR 8.20, 95?% CI 1.3–40, p?<?0.01) and hypertensive disorders (OR 5.45, 95?% CI 2.2–14, p?<?0.01).

Conclusions

The factors associated with postpartum hemorrhage requiring transfusion in cesarean deliveries of twins seemed to be different from those in singleton cesarean deliveries.     

Relationship between placenta previa and maternal age, parity and prior caesarean deliveries

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of placenta previa and to asses the relationship between the incidence of placenta previa and maternal age, parity, prior abortion and cesarean deliveries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of all patients with the diagnosis of placenta previa during the period between 1992 and 2002 at Hospital in Chojnice were reviewed. To determine the relationship between the incidence of placenta previa and maternal age, parity, prior abortion and cesarean deliveries the statistical analyses were carried out. The level of significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS: From a total 11,091 deliveries 24 (0.2%) women had placenta previa. The occurrence of placenta previa increased with maternal age and was the highest in women aged 35 or older--0.8% of all deliveries and the lowest in women aged <25 years--0.07%. The incidence of placenta previa in women with previous deliveries was significantly higher compared to the group of primiparas and increased as the number of prior deliveries increased. The association between previous abortion and cesarean section and placenta previa was not confirmed. CONCLUSION: Advancing maternal age and multiparity appears to increase the occurrence of placenta previa. In this study the relationship between previous abortion and cesarean section was not confirmed.     

Previous cesarean delivery and risks of placenta previa and placental abruption

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between cesarean delivery and previa and abruption in subsequent pregnancies. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of first 2 (n = 156,475) and first 3 (n = 31,102) consecutive singleton pregnancies using the 1989-1997 Missouri longitudinally linked data were performed. Relative risk (RR) was used to quantify the associations between cesarean delivery and risks of previa and abruption in subsequent pregnancies, after adjusting for several confounders. RESULTS: Rates of previa and abruption were 4.4 (n = 694) and 7.9 (n = 1,243) per 1,000 births, respectively. The pregnancy after a cesarean delivery was associated with increased risk of previa (0.63%) compared with a vaginal delivery (0.38%, RR 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-1.8). Cesarean delivery in the first and second births conferred a two-fold increased risk of previa in the third pregnancy (RR 2.0, 95% CI 1.3-3.0) compared with first two vaginal deliveries. Women with a cesarean first birth were more likely to have an abruption in the second pregnancy (0.95%) compared with women who had a vaginal first birth (0.74%, RR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2-1.5). Two consecutive cesarean deliveries were associated with a 30% increased risk of abruption in the third pregnancy (RR 1.3, 95% CI 1.0-1.8). A second pregnancy within a year after a cesarean delivery was associated with increased risks of previa (RR 1.7, 95% CI 0.9-3.1) and abruption (RR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.3). CONCLUSION: A cesarean first birth is associated with increased risks of previa and abruption in the second pregnancy. There is a dose-response pattern in the risk of previa, with increasing number of prior cesarean deliveries. A short interpregnancy interval is associated with increased risks of previa and abruption. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.     

Emergency cesarean delivery in induction of labor: an evaluation of risk factors

BACKGROUND: Induction of labor has been associated with an increased risk of emergency cesarean delivery. Knowledge of factors that influence the risk of cesarean delivery in women with induced labor is limited. METHODS: We performed a case-control study, nested within a population-based cohort of women with induced labor at term during 1991-1996 in Uppsala County, Sweden. Cases were women delivered with emergency cesarean delivery, and controls were women vaginally delivered (n = 193, respectively). Using logistic regression, analyses were performed. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was used as a measure of relative risk. RESULTS: Women with a previous cesarean delivery had high risks of cesarean delivery (adjusted OR = 10.10, 95% CI = 3.30-30.92). The risk of cesarean delivery was also increased among nulliparous (adjusted OR = 4.92, 95% CI = 2.81-8.61), short (adjusted OR = 2.20, 95% CI = 1.06-4.59), and obese women (adjusted OR = 2.03, 95% CI = 1.07-3.84). A cervix dilatation less than 1.5 cm doubled the risk of cesarean delivery (adjusted OR = 2.26, 95% CI = 1.09-4.66). Mother's age, epidural analgesia, oxytocin augmentation, gestational age, and birthweight were not significantly associated with risks of cesarean delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Women with a previous cesarean delivery, nulliparous, short, and obese women with induced labor are at high risk of a cesarean delivery. When there is a need to deliver a woman with a previous cesarean section or a nulliparous woman with other risk factors for cesarean delivery, it may be prudent to consider an elective cesarean section.     

Identifying risk factors for peripartum cesarean hysterectomy. A population-based study

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of, and obstetric risk factors for, emergency peripartum hysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: A population-based study comparing all singleton deliveries between the years 1988 and 1999 that were complicated with peripartum hysterectomy to deliveries without this complication. Statistical analysis was performed with multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Emergency peripartum hysterectomy complicated 0.048% (n = 56) of deliveries in the study (n = 117,685). Independent risk factors for emergency peripartum hysterectomy from a backward, stepwise, multivariable logistic regression model were: uterine rupture (OR = 521.4, 95% CI 197.1-1379.7), placenta previa (OR = 8.2, 95% CI 2.2-31.0), postpartum hemorrhage (OR = 33.3, 95% CI 12.6-88.1), cervical tears (OR = 18.0, 95% CI 6.2-52.4), placenta accreta (OR = 13.2, 95% CI 3.5-50.0), second-trimester bleeding (OR = 9.5, 95% CI 2.3-40.1), previous cesarean section (OR = 6.9, 95% CI 3.7-12.8) and grand multiparity (> 5 deliveries) (OR = 3.4, 95% CI 1.8-6.3). Newborns delivered after peripartum hysterectomy had lower Apgar scores (< 7) at 1 and 5 minutes than did others (OR = 11.5, 95% CI 6.2-20.9 and OR = 27.4, 95% CI 11.2-67.4, respectively). In addition, higher rates of perinatal mortality were noted in the uterine hysterectomy vs. the comparison group (OR = 15.9, 95% CI 7.5-32.6). Affected women were more likely than the controls to receive packed-cell transfusions (OR = 457.7, 95% CI 199.2-1105.8) and had lower hemoglobin levels at discharge from the hospital (9.9 +/- 1.3 vs. 12.8 +/- 5.7, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Cesarean deliveries in patients with suspected placenta accreta, specifically those performed due to placenta previa in women with a previous uterine scar, should involve specially trained obstetricians. In addition, detailed informed consent about the possibility of emergency peripartum hysterectomy and its associated morbidity should be obtained.     

Mode of delivery and fecal incontinence at midlife: a study of 2,640 women in the Gazel cohort

OBJECTIVE: To estimate obstetric risk factors of fecal incontinence among middle-aged women. METHODS: We conducted a mail survey of the Gazel cohort of volunteers for epidemiologic research. In 2000, a questionnaire on anal incontinence was mailed to 3,114 women who were then between the ages of 50 and 61 years; 2,640 (85%) women returned the completed questionnaire. Fecal incontinence was defined by involuntary loss of stool. Logistic regression was used to estimate the effect of obstetric and general risk factors. RESULTS: Prevalence of fecal incontinence in the past 12 months was 9.5% (250). Significant risk factors for fecal incontinence were completion of high school (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-2.0), self-reported depression (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.6-2.7), overweight or obesity measured by body mass index (BMI) (OR 1.5 for BMI of 25-30, 95% CI 1.1-2.0; OR 1.6 for BMI more than 30, 95% CI 1.1-2.5), surgery for urinary incontinence (OR 3.5, 95% CI 2.0-6.1), and anal surgery (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.9). No obstetric variable (parity, mode of delivery, birth weight, episiotomy, or third-degree perineal tear) was significant. Prevalence of fecal incontinence was similar for nulliparous, primiparous, secundiparous, and multiparous women (11.3%, 9.0%, 9.0%, and 10.4%, respectively), and among parous women, it was similar for women with spontaneous vaginal, instrumental (at least one), or only cesarean deliveries (9.3%, 10.0%, and 6.6%, respectively). CONCLUSION: In our population of women in their 50s, fecal incontinence was not associated with either parity or mode of delivery.     

Early preterm delivery due to placenta previa is an independent risk factor for a subsequent spontaneous preterm birth

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: To determine whether patients with placenta previa who delivered preterm have an increased risk for recurrent spontaneous preterm birth. METHODS: This retrospective population based cohort study included patients who delivered after a primary cesarean section (n = 9983). The rate of placenta previa, its recurrence, and the risk for recurrent preterm birth were determined. RESULTS: Patients who had a placenta previa at the primary CS pregnancy had an increased risk for its recurrence [crude OR of 2.65 (95 % CI 1.3-5.5)]. The rate of preterm birth in patients with placenta previa in the primary CS pregnancy was 55.9 %; and these patients had a higher rate of recurrent preterm delivery than the rest of the study population (p < .001). Among patients with placenta previa in the primary CS pregnancy, those who delivered preterm had a higher rate of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth regardless of the location of their placenta in the subsequent delivery [OR 3.09 (95 % CI 2.1-4.6)]. In comparison to all patients with who had a primary cesarean section, patients who had placenta previa and delivered preterm had an independent increased risk for recurrent preterm birth [OR of 3.6 (95 % CI 1.52-8.51)]. CONCLUSIONS: Women with placenta previa, who deliver preterm, especially before 34 weeks of gestation, are at increased risk for recurrent spontaneous preterm birth regardless to the site of placental implantation in the subsequent pregnancy. Thus, strict follow up by high risk pregnancies specialist is recommended.     

The relationship of placenta previa and history of induced abortion.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the risk of placenta previa being associated with a history of induced abortion by different surgical procedures. METHODS: Cases (n=192) were women who had a singleton delivery complicated by placenta previa at a major obstetric care hospital in western Washington state between April 1, 1990 and December 31, 1992. Controls (n=622) were women with singleton deliveries not complicated by placenta previa or abruption. Odds ratios, determined by logistic regression, approximate the relative risks. RESULTS: Vacuum aspiration abortion was not associated with an increased risk of placenta previa (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.6-1.5). However, the risk of placenta previa increased with the number of sharp curettage abortions (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.0-8.5 for > or =3). CONCLUSIONS: Risk of placenta previa may be increased in a dose response fashion by multiple sharp curettage abortions. However, vacuum aspiration does not confer an increased risk, and may be a better alternative.     

Risk Factors for Postpartum Hemorrhage: Can We Explain the Recent Temporal Increase?

ObjectiveTo assess risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) and the extent to which changes in those risk factors may explain the rising incidence of PPH recently reported from industrialized countries.MethodsWe carried out a hospital-based cohort study of 103 726 consecutive deliveries from January 1, 1978, to January 31, 2007, from the computerized medical records of a tertiary-care university maternity hospital in Montreal. We examined adjusted odds ratios for any PPH (estimated blood loss > 500 mL for vaginal deliveries, > 1000 mL for Caesarean sections), severe PPH (estimated blood loss ≥ 1500 mL), and PPH accompanied by blood transfusion and/or hysterectomy.ResultsMajor independent risk factors for PPH included primiparity, prior Caesarean section, placenta previa or low-lying placenta, marginal umbilical cord insertion in the placenta, transverse lie, labour induction and augmentation, uterine or cervical trauma at delivery, gestational age < 32 weeks, and birth weight ≥ 4500 g. An overall increase in rate of PPH over the study period (OR 1.029; 95% CI 1. 024 to 1.034 per year) disappeared (OR 0.995; 95% CI 0.988 to 1.001 per year) after inclusion of maternal age, parity, prior Caesarean section, labour induction and augmentation, placenta previa or low-lying placenta, and abnormal placenta, with most of the reduction attributable to rises in previous Caesarean section and labour augmentation.ConclusionLabour induction, augmentation of labour, and prior Caesarean section are significantly associated with the risk of PPH, and their increase over the study period largely explains the observed rise in PPH.     

Relationship among placenta previa, fetal growth restriction, and preterm delivery: a population-based study

OBJECTIVE: To examine the independent contributions of prematurity and fetal growth restriction to low birth weight among women with placenta previa. METHODS: A population-based, retrospective cohort study of singleton live births in New Jersey (1989-93) was performed. Mother-infant pairs (n = 544,734) were identified from linked birth certificate and maternal and infant hospital discharge summary data. Women diagnosed with previa were included only if they were delivered by cesarean. Fetal growth, defined as gestational age-specific observed-to-expected mean birth weight, and preterm delivery (before 37 completed weeks) were examined in relation to previa. Severe and moderate categories of fetal smallness and large for gestational age were defined as observed-to-expected birth weight ratios below 0.75, 0.75-0.85, and over 1.15, respectively, all of which were compared with appropriately grown infants (observed-to-expected birth weight ratio 0.86-1.15). RESULTS: Placenta previa was recorded in 5.0 per 1000 pregnancies (n = 2744). After controlling for maternal age, education, parity, smoking, alcohol and illicit drug use, adequacy of prenatal care, maternal race, as well as obstetric complications, previa was associated with severe (odds ratio [OR] 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25, 1.50) and moderate fetal smallness (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.17, 1.32) births. Preterm delivery was also more common among women with previa. Adjusted OR of delivery between 20-23 weeks was 1.81 (95% CI 1.24, 2.63), and 2.90 (95% CI 2.46, 3.42) for delivery between 24-27 weeks. OR for delivery by each week between 28 and 36 weeks ranged between 2.7 and 4.0. Approximately 12% of preterm delivery and 3.7% of growth restriction were attributable to placenta previa. CONCLUSION: The association between low birth weight and placenta previa is chiefly due to preterm delivery and to a lesser extent with fetal growth restriction. The risk of fetal smallness is increased slightly among women with previa, but this association may be of little clinical significance.     

Reduced frequency of hypertensive disorders in placenta previa

The isthmic segment of the uterine artery's ascending branch has a freer course and wider diameter than distal parts of the vessel. Therefore, we assumed that this arterial segment would provide better blood flow and prevent hypoxia of the trophoblast. As a result, placenta previa pregnancies would be complicated by hypertensive disorders less often than are pregnancies with normally implanted placentas. To test this hypothesis, 491 placenta previa pregnancies, among a population of 106,866 pregnant women, were compared with pregnancies with normally implanted placentas. Clinically meaningful and statistically significant reductions in the rates and risks of hypertensive disorders were found in placenta previa pregnancies (P = .002, relative risk = 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.25-0.78). The differences persisted when primiparous and multiparous women were examined separately and when preterm and term deliveries were separated. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, patients with placenta previa had a third of the risk for hypertensive disorders compared with pregnant women with normally implanted placentas (relative risk = 0.36, 95% confidence interval 0.20-0.64), even after controlling for parity and preterm or term delivery. In the same model, primiparity and preterm delivery were each associated with a doubling of risk for hypertensive disorders, regardless of the placental implantation site. Thus, regardless of parity and preterm or term delivery, placenta previa and hypertensive disorders are inversely related.