A patient‐held medication record and a patient medication profile to support the continuity of acute cancer care

□ The sharing of care of patients receiving medical oncology care is vulnerable to errors in their documented drug history □ A patient‐held medication record identified over 90 per cent of patients' medications but was ‘forgotten’ by the patient in a third of contacts with a pharmacist □ Discrepancies between the medication records of GPs, community pharmacists and the medical oncology clinic were highly prevalent □ A posted patient medication profile issued by the hospital pharmacist to both the patient's GP and their community pharmacist was associated with a significant convergence in their records (discrepancies reduced from 17 to 6 % P<0.001) □ The patient‐held record had little impact on the accuracy of practitioners' records and its value lies more in facilitating patient education than rectifying errors in documentation     

Best possible medication history for hemodialysis patients obtained by a pharmacy technician

Background:

Outpatients undergoing hemodialysis are at high risk for adverse drug events. Limited resources make it challenging for pharmacists to routinely obtain a best possible medication history (BPMH).

Objectives:

The primary objective was to determine whether, for patients undergoing hemodialysis, a pharmacy technician has the skills to obtain a BPMH that would allow a pharmacist to identify drug-related problems. The secondary objectives were to determine the number and types of medication discrepancies and drug-related problems identified and the time required by the technician to complete the BPMH.

Methods:

All patients treated in the hemodialysis unit during the study period were included, except for those who required an interpreter or were unable to participate in an in-person interview. A single technician was taught how to interview patients according to a structured format. For each patient, the technician’s BMPH was verified by a pharmacist. The agreement rate between technician and pharmacists was determined, along with the number and types of discrepancies and drug-related problems identified.

Results:

The technician interviewed 99 patients. Of the 1334 medication orders reviewed, the technician and pharmacists agreed on all but 15 (agreement rate 98.9%). A total of 358 medication discrepancies were noted for 93 patients (3.8 discrepancies per patient). Of these, 210 (59%) were undocumented intentional discrepancies, and 148 (41%) were unintentional discrepancies (most commonly errors of commission). Of the 135 drug-related problems identified, the majority involved dosing problems or nonadherence. The technician required an average of 17 min for each interview.

Conclusion:

An adequately trained technician was capable of interviewing patients to create a BPMH. A variety of medication discrepancies and drug-related problems were identified. Generation of a BPMH by a technician is a useful approach allowing pharmacists to identify drug-related problems.     

Interview of patients by pharmacists contributes significantly to the identification of drug-related problems (DRPs)

PURPOSE: To investigate whether pharmacist interviews of hospitalised patients about their medication would result in identification of more drug-related problems (DRPs) than those found by usual care procedures and further to characterise the DRPs revealed at the interviews. METHODS: Patients from five internal medicine and two rheumatology departments in four hospitals in Norway were prospectively included in the study. Clinical pharmacists assessed DRPs by reviewing medical records and by participating in multidisciplinary team discussions. Drugs used, medical history, laboratory data and clinical/pharmacological risk factors were recorded (usual care procedure). A proportion of patients were randomly selected for interview with pharmacists. A quality team assessed the clinical significance of the DRPs. RESULTS: Seven hundred and twenty seven patients were included. Significantly more DRPs were found in the interview group (96 patients), an average of 4.4 DRPs per patient as compared to 2.4 DRPs in the non-interview group (631 patients) (p < 0.01). Of a total of 431 DRPs recorded in the interview group, 168 DRPs (39.9%) were disclosed through interviews. 'Need for additional drug', 'medical chart error', 'patient adherence' and 'need for patient education' were significantly more often recorded in this group. The quality team assessed 63% of the DRPs revealed in the interviews to be of major clinical significance. CONCLUSION: Significantly more DRPs were identified among the patients who were interviewed compared to those patients having only usual care examination. A high proportion of the DRPs identified in the interviews were of major clinical significance. The clinical pharmacists, with their way of interviewing, seem to fill a gap, ensuring that significant DRPs do not escape detection.     

Home care pharmacy: extending clinical pharmacy services beyond infusion therapy.

A clinical pharmacy program was developed at an established home health care (HHC) agency to demonstrate the need for clinical pharmacy services in the HHC population and to explore opportunities for providing pharmaceutical care beyond infusion-related therapies. Initial experiences of this pilot project are described. Patients were found to be primarily elderly (mean age, 70 years) and to use a substantial number of medications. While only 11% of patients referred to the agency required infusion therapy, multiple opportunities for pharmacist involvement in patient care were identified and a variety of projects were undertaken. A drug information service was developed, a retrospective evaluation of patients with congestive heart failure led to an interventional study, a cisapride intervention was implemented, home vancomycin monitoring was assessed, pharmaceutical care services were provided to patients enrolled in a long-term home care program, a pain management initiative was begun, adverse drug reactions were identified and reported, and pharmacists participated in agency policy development. Preliminary data suggest that pharmacist involvement positively affected patient care. Drug information was provided on 232 occasions. Cisapride was discontinued in five patients with contraindications to the agent. Comprehensive pharmacotherapy assessments were performed on 29 long-term-care patients, generating 129 therapy recommendations of which 33% were accepted. Pharmacists working with a home care agency identified numerous opportunities for improving patient care. Many of the patients receiving home care services were elderly, took a substantial number of medications, and were at risk for drug-related problems and suboptimal therapy.     

Adverse drug reactions and drug non-compliance as primary causes of admission to a cardiology department

Summary 426 consecutive patients admitted to a Danish University Department of Cardiology have been studied. Drug intake prior to admission by each patient was ascertained from medical records and personal interviews. Adverse drug reactions (ADR) were the primary cause of admission in 49 patients (11.5%), and 16 patients (3.8%) were admitted due to drug non-compliance (DNC).Thiazide diuretics, beta-adrenoceptor blocking agents and calcium antagonists accounted for almost 60% of all the ADR-related admissions. Patients admitted for ADR took significantly more drugs than patients admitted for other reasons. DNC was not correlated with the number of prescribed drugs.It is concluded that drug-related hospital admissions are an important medical and economic problem. Most of the ADRs were well-known and predictable actions of the drugs, and could have been avoided by more careful clinical and laboratory monitoring of the patients. Most of the DNC, too, could have been avoided by giving better information to the patients.     

解放军总医院电子药历管理系统的使用与评价

目的:试用基于我院医院信息管理系统开发的电子药历管理系统,评价其对临床药师工作的辅助作用。方法:临床药师在实际工作中,利用基于医院信息管理系统、采用C Builder和ORACLE后台数据库开发的电子药历程序进行药历书写,并协助研发人员完善系统。结果:应用我院的电子药历管理系统制作药历30余份。使用情况显示该系统界面友好,操作简便,提供的信息全面、准确,为药师提供了良好的药历制作平台。结论:该系统提高了药历制作、管理、使用效率,在临床药师工作与带教中是非常实用的辅助工具。     

Effectiveness of a medication reconciliation project conducted by PharmD students

Objectives

This study evaluated the effectiveness of a medication reconciliation program conducted by doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) students during an advanced pharmacy practice experience.

Methods

Patients admitted to medicine or surgery units at 3 hospitals were included. Students were instructed to interview each patient to obtain a medication history, reconcile this list with the medical chart, and identify and solve drug-related problems.

Results

Eleven students reconciled medications for 330 patients over 10 months and identified 922 discrepancies. The median number of discrepancies found per patient was 2, and no discrepancies were found in 25% of the cases. In cases in which discrepancies were identified, a greater number of medications had been prescribed for the patient (7.9 ± 4.0 medications compared to 5.4 ± 3.9 medications; p < 0.05). The students completed 59 interventions. Differences were found in the numbers of discrepancies and drug-related problems that different students at different sites identified (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Pharmacy students provided a valuable service to 3 community hospitals. The students improved the quality of patient care by identifying and solving significant drug-related problems, identifying drug allergy information, and resolving home and admission medication discrepancies.     

Medication history reconciliation by pharmacists in an inpatient behavioral health unit.

PURPOSE: The effectiveness of a pharmacy-obtained medication history on the medication reconciliation process in the behavioral health unit (BHU) of a community hospital was studied. METHODS: Patients admitted to the BHU of a 411-bed, not-for-profit hospital from 6 a.m. on Monday through 12 p.m. on Friday from September 1, 2005, through October 6, 2005, were candidates for the study. Within 18 hours of admission to the BHU and after the medication history had been obtained by a nurse, a pharmacy technician gathered patient demographic and medication information from the chart and the patient's medication bottles. Once the technician completed the documentation, the pharmacist was notified of a new admission. The pharmacist reviewed the collected documentation and patient chart before interviewing the patient. RESULTS: Of the 54 patients who met the study's inclusion criteria, 91% were seen by a pharmacist within 18 hours of admission. The mean +/- S.D. time delay to interview the patient was 11.6 +/- 5.1 hours. Pharmacists spent a mean of 13.9 minutes completing patients' medication histories. The mean +/- S.D. number of medications identified by nursing on admission was 4.0 +/- 3.2, compared with 5.3 +/- 3.7 identified by pharmacists (p < 0.05). The mean number of medication discrepancies identified per patient was 2.9. Of the discrepancies, 48% were related to an omitted or incorrect medication, 31% to an omitted or incorrect dose, and 13% to an omitted or incorrect frequency; 8% were categorized as miscellaneous. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists' participation in obtaining patients' medication histories through chart review and patient interview increased the effectiveness of the medication reconciliation process in an inpatient BHU.     

Pharmaceutical care model for patients with type 2 diabetes: integration of the community pharmacist into the diabetes team – a pilot study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and impact of a structured approach for community pharmacist input as a member of the multidisciplinary team caring for patients with type-2 diabetes and health professional providing advice on medication. METHODS: Prospective pretest-posttest single group study. Sixty-two patients on oral hypoglycaemic therapy, identified as regular customers of four Scottish (UK) community pharmacies, were recruited. Each patient underwent an initial assessment: review of medical general practice notes/community pharmacy PMR (Patient medication record) system and structured interview. Standardised documentation was completed, a pharmaceutical care plan (PCP) prepared, peer-reviewed and then discussed face-to-face with patients' GPs (general practitioners). A second (final) assessment was conducted 24 to 28 weeks from the initial interview. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pharmaceutical care issues (PCIs) throughout study period; change in parameters from initial to final assessment: patient knowledge of oral hypoglycaemic and anti-hypertensive therapy; HbA1c; blood pressure; total cholesterol; medication compliance. RESULTS: A total of 178 PCIs were identified (mean [range] 2.9 [1-5] per patient) and categorised: drug therapy problems (n = 76); monitoring (n = 21); and patient knowledge (n = 81). Drug therapy problems discussed with the GPs were agreed for 74 (97%) and resolved for 55 (72%) at final assessment. Biological outcome measures were assessed for 59 patients (3 drop-outs). A reduction (P < 0.05) in HbA1 c, blood pressure and total cholesterol was observed over the study period. Patients knowledge was poor for oral hypoglycaemic therapy but improved (initial-51 %, final-72%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a feasible pharmaceutical care model for diabetes patients in an European country. The results have shown the pharmacist to be effective and well accepted by GPs and patients.     

Drug-related problems in general practice: results from a development project in Denmark

Objective The objective of the study is identify and document drug-related problems and other possible quality problems in primary care through a pharmacist-run medication review and screening service. GPs’ acceptance and implementation rates of the pharmacist’s recommendations are evaluated.Method A community pharmacist worked 20 h per week for 18 months in a GP practice with three GPs.Results The pharmacist completed 40 reviews and identified 103 drug-related problems. GPs had a high rate of acceptance of the pharmacist’s suggested interventions (83%), and 77% of the recommendations had been implemented. 765 (12.5%) possible quality problems were identified after screening 6094 medical records. The physicians accepted 86% of the recommendations to initiate low dosage ASA and treatment was implemented for 63% of the patients. 76% of the recommendations to initiate Statin treatment were agreed on and 56% were implemented.Conclusions The pharmacist was able to identify drug-related problems and other possible quality problems with regard to quality assurance of individual patient’s drug treatment. The GPs accepted and implemented the pharmacist’s recommendations. It was feasible to implement the services and to establish well-functioning co-operation between the pharmacist and the GPs.     

Drug-related problems in patients with ischemic stroke in hospital

Background Drug therapy is getting more complex, thus making it more challenging to prescribe appropriate drug therapy. Accordingly, in clinical practice, a wide range of drug-related problems (DRP) may arise; they are relatively common in hospitalised patients and can result in patient morbidity and mortality, and increased costs. Objective The objective was to investigate the nature and frequency of DRPs along with pharmaceutical interventions to address them in patients with ischemic stroke from hospital admission to discharge. Method From January to June 2011 patients with ischemic stroke, who were taking >2 drugs during hospital stay and at discharge, were recruited. A clinical pharmacist performed medication reconciliation on admission, and checked the medication records during the hospital stay regularly. DRPs were categorized by APS-Doc. Results In total, DRPs occurred in 105/155 (67.7?%) patients: Overall 271 DRPs were documented, with a mean of 1.8?±?2.0 DRPs per patient. The DRPs occurred mainly in the categories ??drug??, ??indication??, and ??dosage??. Conclusion In conclusion, DRPs are relatively common in hospitalised patients and may occur at any part of the prescribing process. The clinical pharmacist can provide a valuable contribution in the multidisciplinary team to an optimized pharmacotherapy in patients with ischemic stroke.     

Effect of clinical pharmacist intervention on medication discrepancies following hospital discharge

Background Medication discrepancies may occur at transitions in care and negatively impact patient outcomes. Objective To determine if involving clinical pharmacists in hospital care, medication reconciliation and discharge medication plan communication can reduce medication discrepancies with a prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled trial. Setting A large, tertiary care, academic medical center. Method The intervention consisted of clinical pharmacist medication reconciliation, patient education and improved communication of the discharge medication plan, as devised by the hospital physician and care team, to primary care physicians and community pharmacists. Medication discrepancies were identified by blinded research pharmacists who reviewed primary care physician and pharmacy records at discharge through 90 days post-discharge to create 30- and 90-day medication lists. Main outcome measure Rate of medication discrepancies compared across groups. Results A total of 592 subjects from internal medicine, family medicine, cardiology and orthopedic services were evaluated for this study. Clinically important medication discrepancies in the primary care physician record were different between groups 30 days after hospital discharge following a clinical pharmacist’s intervention. The mean number of medication discrepancies per patient for the enhanced group being nearly half the number in the control group. However, this effect did not persist to 90 days post-discharge and did not extend to community pharmacy records. Conclusion The present study demonstrates the involvement of pharmacists in hospital care, medication reconciliation and discharge medication plan communication may affect the quality of the outpatient medical record.     

Drug-related problems in hospitalized patients with HIV infection.

PURPOSE: The type and number of drug-related problems that commonly occur in hospitalized patients with HIV were studied. METHODS: The medical records of HIV-infected patients who were receiving antiretroviral therapy at the time of hospital admission between January 1, 2005, and August 31, 2006, were reviewed. Patients age 18 years or older who had received at least one dose of an antiretroviral for an HIV-related indication during their hospitalization were included in the study. Patients' medical records were evaluated to identify drug-related problems and adverse drug events secondary to antiretroviral therapy. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were eligible for study inclusion. A total of 176 drug-related problems were identified. The most common drug-related problem identified among medication orders reviewed was inappropriate dosing. Of the 251 orders for antiretroviral agents, 57 drugs were inappropriately dosed. The most common drug-related problems among patients were drug-drug interactions and incomplete antiretroviral regimens. There was no significant difference in the mean length of stay between patients with or without drug-related problems. Admission by physicians who were not infectious diseases specialists was an independent risk factor for having at least one drug-related problem during hospitalization (odds ratio, 3.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-13.54). CONCLUSION: A majority of HIV-infected patients at one institution had at least one drug-related problem at hospital admission. The most common problem observed among the medication orders reviewed was inappropriate dosing. The most common drug-related problems observed among patients were drug-drug interactions and incomplete antiretroviral regimens.     

Handling drug-related problems in rehabilitation patients: a randomized study

Background Drug-related problems (DRPs) have been found to be associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and health costs. Objective To investigate whether the inclusion of pharmacists in a rehabilitation team influences the handling of DRPs in the ward and whether an intervention in hospital affects drug use after discharge. Setting The rehabilitation ward of a general hospital in Oslo, Norway. Methods Patients were randomized into an intervention group (IG) or a usual care group (CG). The IG patients were followed prospectively by a pharmacist, who reviewed the patients?? drug therapies using information from their medical records and patient interviews. The pharmacist identified DRPs and suggested solutions during multidisciplinary team meetings. The IG patients received targeted drug counselling from the pharmacist before discharge. The drug therapy in the CG, for the period from study randomization to discharge, was assessed retrospectively by the pharmacist, who identified DRPs and recorded how they were acted upon. Three months after discharge, pharmacists who were blinded to the patient randomization, visited the patients at home and interviewed them about their medication. Main outcome measures: Types and frequencies of DRPs in the IG and CG were compared at hospital admission, at discharge, and 3?months after discharge. Results Of the 77 patients included, 40 belonged to the IG and 37 to the CG. Patient characteristics (IG vs CG) were as follows: age 73.5 versus 76.8?years; female 58 versus 68%; mean number of drugs at admission 8.3 versus 7.8; and mean number of drugs at discharge 8.5 versus 7.7. At admission, 4.4 DRPs per patient were recorded in the IG and 4.2 in the CG. Significantly more DRPs were acted upon and resolved in the IG; at discharge, the IG had 1.2 DRPs per patient and the CG had 4.0 (P?<?0.01). At the home visit, a significant difference between the groups was found: 1.63 versus 2.62 DRPs (P?=?0.02) for the IG and the CG, respectively. Conclusion Involvement of a pharmacist in drug-therapy management, including participation in multidisciplinary team discussions, markedly improved the identification and resolution of DRPs during a hospital stay. The benefit persisted after discharge.     

Medication reconciliation by clinical pharmacists in an outpatient family medicine clinic

ObjectivesTo evaluate the incidence of medication discrepancies in electronic health record (EHR) medication lists in an outpatient family medicine clinic where clinical pharmacists perform medication reconciliation, to classify and resolve the discrepancies, to identify the most common medication classes involved, and to assess the clinical importance of the discrepancies.MethodsThis research was conducted at Bethesda Family Medicine Clinic in St. Paul, MN, with data collected from February 2009 to February 2010. To be included, patients had to be 18 years or older and have at least 10 medications listed in the EHR. The clinical pharmacist saw each patient before the physician, reviewed the medication list with the patient, and made corrections to the EHR medication list. When possible, comprehensive medication management (CMM) also was conducted.ResultsDuring 1 year, 327 patients were seen for medication reconciliation. A total of 2,167 discrepancies were identified and resolved, with a mean (±SD) of 6.6 ±  total discrepancies and 3.4 ±  clinically important discrepancies per patient. The range of total discrepancies per patient was 0 to 26. The most common discrepancy category was “patient not taking medication on list” (54.1%). Overall, the source of the discrepancy usually was the patient, but it varied according to discrepancy category. The most common medication classes involved were pain medications, gastrointestinal medications, and topical medications. Of the 2,167 discrepancies, 51.1% were determined to be clinically important by the pharmacist. The pharmacist conducted CMM in 48% of patients.ConclusionOutpatient medication reconciliation by a pharmacist identified and resolved a large number of medication discrepancies and improved the accuracy of EHR medication lists. Because more than 50% of the discrepancies were thought to be clinically important, improving the accuracy of medication lists could affect patient care.