The use of functional and traditional mobilization interventions in a patient with chronic thoracic pain: a case report

Abstract

There is little information in the literature regarding the efficacy of spinal manual therapy (SMT) interventions for patients with chronic thoracic spinal pain. In addition, information regarding the clinical decision-making associated with the application of SMT for this patient population is deficient. The purpose of this case report is to present the rationale for and results of applying specific SMT interventions on a patient with chronic spinal pain. A 51-year-old female with 9 months of significant thoracic, chest, sternal, and left shoulder pain was managed with both mobilization with movement and spinal manipulative procedures. The report offers insight into the decisions that guided the selection of these SMT techniques in this case. The outcome provides preliminary support for using these specific SMT procedures in patients with chronic thoracic spinal pain.     

Effect of rehabilitative exercise and spinal manipulative therapy on veteran with chronic diffuse spine pain: A case report

IntroductionPatient is a 57-year-old male veteran with complaints of musculoskeletal origin. The patient was treated with rehabilitative exercise, manual therapy, and spinal manipulative therapy. Treatment helped improve the patient's ability to perform ADLs and is reflected in rehabilitative exercise progression and objective findings.Case presentationThe patient is a 57-year-old male veteran who presented with chronic cervical, thoracic, and lumbar pain. Range of motion was decreased and painful during all active ranges of motion. Each region had degenerative changes at various levels confirmed via radiographs. Rehabilitative exercise was directed with results from a Selective Functional Movement Assessment (SFMA). Patient was treated with manual therapy and spinal manipulative therapy (SMT). Rehabilitative exercises were selected to improve the patient's ADLs based on goals, to target chief complaints, and correct SFMA findings.Management and outcomeThe patient's progress was tracked with progression in rehabilitative exercise. The patient's objective findings continually improved throughout the care plan. At the end of the care plan, the patient underwent the same examination, and the objective findings were compared. There was an improvement across all objective testing.DiscussionThis case demonstrates the classic veteran with chronic diffuse spine pain that interferes with performance in their normal activities of daily living. This case demonstrated that the combination of soft tissue therapy, SMT and rehabilitative exercise can show an improvement in objective findings and help the patient meet their goals.     

Force transmission between thoracic and cervical segments of the spine during prone-lying high-velocity low-amplitude spinal manipulation: A proof of principle for the concept of regional interdependence

BackgroundRegional interdependence is conceptually based on observations that applying manual therapy to a remote anatomical region has an effect in the area of the patient's primary complaint. The current model for regional interdependence depends on force transmissibility within the body. This investigation sought to determine transmissibility between forces applied to the thoracic spine during prone-lying high-velocity low-amplitude spinal manipulative therapy and the cervical spine.MethodsA chiropractic treatment table was modified to allow (or disallow) translation of the headrest in the caudal-cephalad direction when unlocked (or locked). Prone-lying high-velocity low-amplitude spinal manipulative therapy was applied to the thoracic region of 9 healthy participants with the headrest in both configurations. Head and thorax kinematics and kinetics were measured at interfaces between participant and the external environment, which included the clinician's hands. Compressive forces at the cervicothoracic junction and angular kinematics of the cervical spine were derived. Ratios between the clinician-applied forces (input) and the cervical compressive force (output) were also determined.FindingsThe cervical spine extended during all high-velocity low-amplitude spinal manipulative therapy trials. Force input-to-output ratios exceeded 1 for high-velocity low-amplitude spinal manipulative therapy trials performed with the headrest in the locked configuration, which was greater than ratios for the unlocked configuration.InterpretationForces imparted to thoracic spine during high-velocity low-amplitude spinal manipulative therapy were transmitted to the cervical spine, which provided a precursor for the regional interdependence model for manual therapy. Friction between the participant's face and the treatment table's head rest likely amplified cervical compressive forces.     

Spinal manipulation does not affect pressure pain thresholds in the absence of neuromodulators: a randomized controlled trial

Background: Measurement of pressure pain threshold (PPT) is a way to determine one of the many potential treatment effects of spinal manipulative therapy.

Objective: To determine how multiple spinal manipulations administered in a single-session affected PPTs at local and distal sites in asymptomatic individuals.

Methods: Participants were randomly assigned into one of three groups: Group one (n = 18) received a lumbar manipulation followed by a cervical manipulation. Group two (n = 17) received a cervical manipulation followed by a lumbar manipulation. The control group (n = 19) received two bouts of five minutes of rest. At baseline and after each intervention or rest period, each participant’s PPTs were obtained using a handheld algometer. The PPTs were tested bilaterally over the lateral epicondyles of the humerus and over the mid-bellies of the upper trapezius, lumbar paraspinal, and the tibialis anterior muscles. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, and its Identifier is NCT02828501.

Results: Repeated-measures ANOVAs and Kruskal–Wallis tests showed no significant within- or between-group differences in PPT. Within-group effect sizes in the changes of PPT ranged from ?.48 at the left paraspinal muscles to .24 at the left lateral humeral epicondyle. Statistical power to detect significant differences at α of 0.05 was calculated to be 0.94.

Conclusions: This study suggests that in young adults who do not have current or recent symptoms of spinal pain, multiple within-session treatments of cervical and lumbar spinal manipulation fail to influence PPTs. Changes in PPT that are observed in symptomatic individuals are likely to be primarily influenced by pain-related neuromodulators rather than by an isolated, mechanical effect of spinal manipulation.     

Bronchogenic carcinoma presenting as neuromusculoskeletal pain

A case of bronchogenic carcinoma manifesting Pancoast's syndrome is presented. A 48-year-old female patient suffered from pain in the neck, axilla, anterior lower ribs and subscapular regions, with thoracic paraspinal muscle spasm, and paresthesia in the right upper extremity. An anteroposterior lower cervical radiograph demonstrated a homogenous mass lesion in the apex of the right lung. The patient was referred for medical diagnosis and treatment. A significant reduction in the pain experienced by the patient was achieved with spinal manipulative therapy while the patient was undergoing medical therapy for the malignancy.     

The effect of chiropractic care for a 30-year-old male with advanced ankylosing spondylitis: a time series case report

BACKGROUND: Manipulative treatment for ankylosing spondylitis is a controversial subject, and no literature on using this therapy for advanced cases with fusion of the spine could be found. OBJECTIVE: To discuss the case presentation of a patient with advanced ankylosing spondylitis who was treated with chiropractic manipulation and mobilization.Clinical features The patient was a 30-year-old Asian male who was first diagnosed with ankylosing spondylitis at age 12. Despite medical intervention, a series of exacerbations had fused his sacroiliac joints and the facet joints in his lumbar and cervical spine. He presented with local moderate-to-severe pain in his low back and neck and lack of mobility.Intervention and outcome The patient was treated with grade 5 manipulation of his thoracic spine and grade 3 mobilization of his lumbar and cervical spine, along with physical therapy and stretches for a period of 12 weeks. He reported some improvement of his condition as measured by the SF-36 Health Survey and several measures of spinal flexibility. CONCLUSIONS: This case shows that even advanced cases of ankylosing spondylitis may show a favorable response to chiropractic manipulative therapy.     

Prehospital clinical findings associated with spinal injury

Objective. The objective of this study was to identify clinical findings that are associated with spinal fracture and/or spinal cord injuries in prehospital trauma patients.

Methods. A retrospective chart review was performed at three tertiary referral centers in Southeastern Michigan. All charts of patients with spinal fractures or spinal cord injuries during 1992 and 1993 were reviewed. Patients with available pre-hospital records were included in the study analysis. Prehospital data points included documentation of head injury; altered mental status; neurologic deficit; evidence of intoxication; cervical, thoracic, and lumbar pain or tenderness; nonspecified back pain or tenderness; and a narrative for all other documented injuries. Hospital data collected included type and level of spinal injury and age and sex of the patient.

Results. Of 867 injury patients identified, 536 were excluded, leaving 346 analyzable fractures in 331 patients. The 346 spinal fractures/spinal cord injuries were distributed as: 100 (29%) cervical, 83 (24%) thoracic, 128 (37%) lumbar, and 35 (10%) sacral. Prehospital documentation of altered mental status, neurologic deficit, evidence of intoxication, spinal pain, or suspected extremity fracture was found for every patient with a cervical injury, 82/83 patients with thoracic injuries (99%), and 124/128 patients with lumbar injuries (97%). All five patients who were not documented as having one of the predictors had stable injuries.

Conclusion. Prehospital clinical findings of altered mental status, neurologic deficit, evidence of intoxication, spinal pain, and suspected extremity fracture were documented for all patients with significant spinal injuries in this series. These findings may be useful to identify patients who require prehospital spinal immobilization.     

Clinical considerations in the chiropractic management of the patient with Marfan syndrome

OBJECTIVE: To describe the chiropractic management of a patient with whiplash-associated disorder and a covert, concomitant dissecting aneurysm of the thoracic aorta caused by Marfan syndrome or a related variant. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 25-year-old man was referred by his family physician for chiropractic assessment and treatment of neck injuries received in a motor vehicle accident. After history, physical examination, and plain film radiographic investigation, a diagnosis of whiplash-associated disorder grade I was generated. INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME: The whiplash-associated disorder grade I was treated conservatively. Therapeutic management involved soft-tissue therapy to the suspensory and paraspinal musculature of the upper back and neck. Rotary, manual-style manipulative therapy of the cervical and compressive manipulative therapy of the thoracic spinal column were implemented to maintain range of motion and decrease pain. The patient achieved full recovery within a 3-week treatment period and was discharged from care. One week after discharge, he underwent a routine evaluation by his family physician, where an aortic murmur was identified. Diagnostic ultrasound revealed a dissecting aneurysm measuring 78 mm at the aortic root. Immediate surgical correction was initiated with a polyethylene terephthalate fiber graft. The pathologic report indicated that aortic features were consistent with an old (healed) aortic dissection. There was no evidence of acute dissection. Six month follow-up revealed that surgical repair was successful in arresting further aortic dissection. CONCLUSION: The patient had an old aortic dissection that pre-dated the chiropractic treatment (which included manipulative therapy) for the whiplash-associated disorder. Manipulative therapy, long considered an absolute contraindication for abdominal and aortic aneurysms, did not provoke the progression of the aortic dissection or other negative sequelae. The cause, histology, clinical features, and management considerations in the treatment of this patient's condition(s) are discussed.     

Muscular fitness is associated with spinal pain among young people: A cross-sectional exploratory study

Purposethe aim of this study was to analyze the association between upper limb muscular fitness and spinal pain in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar regions among young people.MethodsCross-sectional study involving a probabilistic sample of 1054 participants (547 female) with ages ranging from 10 to 17 years, from Brazil. The dependent variable was pain in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar regions of the spine, assessed by a self-report instrument. The independent variable was muscular fitness, verified using the 90° push-up test with the cut-offs proposed by FITNESSGRAM. The covariates were age, sex, socioeconomic status, physical activity, and body mass index. Ordinal logistic regression was adopted to conduct the multivariate association and estimate the Odds Ratios (OR). Two separate analyses were conducted: one with the whole sample and the other with only participants who reported pain.ResultsThe prevalences of spine pain in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar regions were 24.4, 28.3, and 31.0%. In the whole sample, young people who achieved the criterion-referenced standard for muscular fitness were less likely to present high intensity pain in the thoracic region (OR = 0.67, 0.50–0.90). The same occurred when analyzing only those who reported pain for cervical region (OR = 0.48, 0.29–0.79). No association was found between muscular fitness and lumbar pain.ConclusionsUpper limb muscular fitness can be used as an additional tool to prevent high levels of spine pain in the thoracic region among young people as well as the severity of cervical pain in those who report pain.     

Reflex Responses of Neck,Back, and Limb Muscles to High-Velocity,Low-Amplitude Manual Cervical and Upper Thoracic Spinal Manipulation of Asymptomatic Individuals—A Descriptive Study

ObjectiveThe purpose of this research was to determine the extent of reflex responses after spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) of the cervical and upper thoracic spine.MethodsEleven asymptomatic participants received 6 commonly used SMTs to the cervical and upper thoracic spine. Bipolar surface electromyography electrodes were used to measure reflex responses of 16 neck, back, and proximal limb muscles bilaterally. The percentage of occurrence and the extent of reflex responses of these muscles were determined.ResultsReflex responses after cervical SMT were typically present in all neck and most back muscles, whereas responses in the outlets to the arm and leg were less frequent. This trend was similar, although decreased in magnitude, after thoracic SMT.ConclusionReflex responses were greatest after upper cervical SMT and lowest with thoracic SMT.     

Development of spontaneous intracranial hypotension concurrent with grade IV mobilization of the cervical and thoracic spine: a case report

Donovan JS, Kerber CW, Donovan WH, Marshall LF. Development of spontaneous intracranial hypotension concurrent with grade IV mobilization of the cervical and thoracic spine: a case report.Spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) has been clinically defined as the development of severe orthostatic headaches caused by an acute cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. Typically, intracranial hypotension occurs as a complication of lumbar puncture, but recent reports have identified cases caused by minor trauma. We report a case of SIH secondary to a dural tear caused by a cervical and thoracic spine mobilization. A 32-year-old woman with SIH presented with severe positional headaches with associated hearing loss and C6-8 nerve root distribution weakness. CSF opening pressure was less than 5cmH₂O and showed no abnormalities in white blood cell count. Cranial, cervical, and thoracic magnetic resonance imaging revealed epidural and subdural collections of CSF with associated meningeal enhancement. Repeated computed tomography myelograms localized the leak to multiple levels of the lower cervical and upper thoracic spine. A conservative management approach of bedrest and increased caffeine intake had no effect on the dural tear. The headache, hearing loss, and arm symptoms resolved completely after 2 epidural blood patches were performed. Practitioners performing manual therapy should be aware of this rare, yet potential complication of spinal mobilizations and manipulations.     

Severe lumbar spinal stenosis combined with Guillain-Barré syndrome: A case report

BACKGROUNDGuillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is a rare disorder that typically presents with ascending weakness, pain, paraesthesias, and numbness, which mimic the findings in lumbar spinal stenosis. Here, we report a case of severe lumbar spinal stenosis combined with GBS.CASE SUMMARYA 70-year-old man with a history of lumbar spinal stenosis presented to our emergency department with severe lower back pain and lower extremity numbness. Magnetic resonance imaging confirmed the diagnosis of severe lumbar spinal stenosis. However, his symptoms did not improve postoperatively and he developed dysphagia and upper extremity numbness. An electromyogram was performed. Based on his symptoms, physical examination, and electromyogram, he was diagnosed with GBS. After 5 d of intravenous immunoglobulin (0.4 g/kg/d for 5 d) therapy, he gained 4/5 of strength in his upper and lower extremities and denied paraesthesias. He had regained 5/5 of strength in his extremities when he was discharged and had no symptoms during follow-up.CONCLUSIONGBS should be considered in the differential diagnosis of spinal disorder, even though magnetic resonance imaging shows severe lumbar spinal stenosis. This case highlights the importance of a careful diagnosis when a patient has a history of a disease and comes to the hospital with the same or similar symptoms.     

Lumbar extension exercises in conjunction with mechanical traction for the management of a patient with a lumbar herniated disc

ABSTRACT

Low back pain resulting from lumbar disc herniation is a common reason for referral for physical therapy. There is no evidence to support the management of lumbar disc herniation and derangement using mechanical traction combined with lumbar extension exercises. Therefore, the purpose of this case report was to describe and discuss the use of mechanical traction in conjunction with lumbar extension exercises for a patient with a lumbar herniated disc. The patient was a 49-year-old male referred to physical therapy with a medical diagnosis of a lumbar herniated disc at L5-S1 with compression of the L5 nerve root confirmed by MRI. The patient's chief complaint was pain over the left lumbosacral and central lumbar region with radiating pain into the left buttock accompanied by numbness and tingling in the left lower leg and foot. The patient was seen for a total of 14 visits. The first 5 days (2 weeks) of therapy consisted of lumbar extension exercises. For the following nine visits (over a 3-week period), mechanical traction was added as an adjunct to the extension exercises. Outcome measures included the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, Back Pain Function Scale (BPFS), and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Results from initial evaluation to discharge (Oswestry: 36% to 0%; BPFS: 33/60 to 57/60; NPRS: 7/10 to 0/10) demonstrated that the patient no longer experienced low back pain and improved in terms of functional status and pain-related disability. The patient no longer complained of numbness and tingling in the left lower extremity and the goals for the patient had been attained. The data from this case report suggests lumbar extension exercises in conjunction with mechanical traction facilitated the patient's improvement in pain and return to prior level of function.     

Manipulation under joint anesthesia/analgesia: a proposed interdisciplinary treatment approach for recalcitrant spinal axis pain of synovial joint origin

BACKGROUND: Manipulation under joint anesthesia/analgesia (MUJA) is an approach to treatment for patients with chronic, recalcitrant spinal axis pain of synovial joint origin. MUJA is the synthesis of fluoroscopically and corticosteroid agents with targeted, manual mobilizations and/or manipulations of the injected joint(s). DISCUSSION: MUJA should be viewed with guarded optimism because its success is based solely on anecdotal experience. Many physicians (specializing in targeted intraarticular "blocks" of spinal synovial joints) and chiropractors (specializing in manual mobilization and manipulation of spinal synovial joints) in the Tyler, Texas, area have treated more than 1000 patients over a 7-year period with the MUJA protocol. This protocol includes treatment of the atlanto-occipital and lateral atantoaxial joints of the upper cervical spine, the zygapophysial joints of the cervical spine from C2-3 to C6-7, the thoracic spine and the lumbar spine, and the pelvic sacroiliac joints. CONCLUSION: The following patient types are suitable candidates for MUJA: patients with dominant spinal axis pain who have been unable to progress despite the passage of sufficient time (>2 months) and the delivery of prior treatments, including spinal manipulative therapy; patients with pain so severe that standard manipulative therapy cannot be delivered with technical success; and patients with complex problems in whom the diagnosis of synovial joint-mediated spinal pain must be established before the safe delivery of manipulative therapy.     

Spinal cord compression secondary to metastatic non-Hodgkins lymphoma: a case report

Luo CC. Spinal cord compression secondary to metastatic non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a case report.Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma spine metastasis is a rare entity. A woman in her mid fifties with history of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma was admitted to the hospital with bilateral leg weakness, anesthesia, and incontinence. Magnetic resonance imaging of the spine showed diffuse metastatic disease involving the cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine. She was treated with radiation therapy and high doses of corticosteroids. When discharged to home, she could ambulate with a rolling walker independently, was capable of self-catheterization, and could insert suppositories for a bladder and bowel program.     

Primary intramedullary melanoma of lumbar spinal cord: A case report

BACKGROUNDPrimary intramedullary melanoma is a very rare tumor, most frequently occurring in the cervical and thoracic spinal cord.CASE SUMMARYWe present a rare case in which the primary intramedullary melanoma was located in the lumbar spine. A 56-year-old man complained of progressive intermittent pain in the lumbar area. Thoracic magnetic resonance imaging showed a spinal intramedullary tumor between the L3 and S1 levels. The tumor was resected entirely, and the diagnosis of malignant melanoma was confirmed by histopathology. CONCLUSIONPrimary melanoma of the spinal cord, particularly intramedullary localization, has rarely been reported in the previous literature. We describe a primary malignant melanoma of the lumbar spinal cord and discuss the challenges associated with the diagnosis.