Orthopaedic trauma care: a two-tier system?

Orthopaedic trauma requiring surgical admission presents to our hospitals right throughout the week. However, the level of service provided to trauma patients appears to fluctuate with more surgery facilities available during weekday "office-hours" with reduced facilities at the weekend. The National Confidential Enquiry into Peri-operative Deaths (NCEPOD) in 1999 laid down guidelines for orthopaedic trauma surgery in elderly patients clearly stating that no elderly patient requiring an urgent operation should have to wait for more than 24 h once fit for surgery. We see no reason to exclude the younger population from such a directive and have hence applied the same standard of "surgery within 24 h of admission" as our index of appropriate practice. Audit of our consultant delivered performance confirmed that while an average 88% of "weekday service" patients admitted Sunday through Thursday achieved this standard, only an average of 64% of weekend service patients admitted on Friday or Saturday achieved the same standard. The purpose of this report is to increase awareness of what we believe to be a widespread dilemma. The day of the week should not dictate the treatment of the patient.     

Adding to the story,did penetrating trauma really increase? changes in trauma patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-institutional,multi-region investigation

BackgroundResults from single-region studies suggest that stay at home orders (SAHOs) had unforeseen consequences on the volume and patterns of traumatic injury during the initial months of the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The aim of this study was to describe, using a multi-regional approach, the effects of COVID-19 SAHOs on trauma volume and patterns of traumatic injury in the US.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed at four verified Level I trauma centers spanning three geographical regions across the United States (US). The study period spanned from April 1, 2020 – July 31, 2020 including a month-matched 2019 cohort. Patients were categorized into pre-COVID-19 (PCOV19) and first COVID-19 surge (FCOV19S) cohorts. Patient demographic, injury, and outcome data were collected via Trauma Registry queries. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.ResultsA total 5,616 patients presented to participating study centers during the PCOV19 (2,916) and FCOV19S (2,700) study periods.  Blunt injury volume decreased (p = 0.006) due to a significant reduction in the number of motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) (p = 0.003). Penetrating trauma experienced a significant increase, 8% (246/2916) in 2019 to 11% (285/2,700) in 2020 (p = 0.007), which was associated with study site (p = 0.002), not SAHOs. Finally, study site was significantly associated with changes in nearly all injury mechanisms, whereas SAHOs accounted for observed decreases in calculated weekly averages of blunt injuries (p < 0.02) and MVCs (p = 0.003).ConclusionResults of this study suggest that COVID-19 and initial SAHOs had variable consequences on patterns of traumatic injury, and that region-specific shifts in traumatic injury ensued during initial SAHOs. These results suggest that other factors, potentially socioeconomic or cultural, confound trauma volumes and types arising from SAHOs. Future analyses must consider how regional changes may be obscured with pooled cohorts, and focus on characterizing community-level changes to aid municipal preparation for future similar events.     

Pediatric trauma care: a profitable enterprise?

Purpose

We set out to examine whether pediatric trauma care resulted in a financial burden.

Methods

We reviewed financial data for children with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition, injury diagnosis code over 2 years at an urban level I pediatric trauma center. We divided inpatients into length of stay categories, and profit or loss was calculated for each payor/length of stay category. These figures were then used to estimate revenue for each hospital based upon their patients payor/length of stay distribution that was obtained from the KID database. Our payor-based outpatient revenue figures were also applied to the other hospital-calculated outpatient visits to obtain an estimate of their outpatient revenues.

Results

We treated 49,437 injured children with a revenue balance of more than $8 million. Commercial insurance resulted in a positive revenue stream. Losses increased as length of stay increased for patients with Medicaid or self-pay. Outpatient encounters resulted in 59% of the revenue. Extrapolating our data, 84% of pediatric trauma centers in 27 states generate an average of $800,000 revenue.

Conclusions

Pediatric trauma care is a profitable enterprise. Inadequate reimbursement remains for Medicaid and self-pay patients, which could result in financial losses should this proportion of the patient mix be more than 55%.     

Digital communication platforms in cardiothoracic surgery during COVID-19 pandemic: keeping us connected or isolated?

During the COVID-19 pandemic, performing a surgeon’s duties has become challenging while adhering to social distancing mandates. To aid in the continuity of healthcare services, rapid implementation of digital communication tools became a necessity. This is an account of experiences using digital communication platforms, namely Microsoft Teams and Zoom, for clinical and educative purposes in the field of Cardiothoracic Surgery in the UK. While enabling ongoing virtual clinical meetings, conferences and learning opportunities for residents with little face-to-face contact, are these digital communication platforms keeping us connected or isolated?     

Wii-habilitation: Is there a role in trauma?

Rehabilitation forms an essential component of the therapeutic continuum in multiply injured patients. Effective rehabilitation programmes assist patients in optimising their level of physical, psychological and social function, while also reducing the length of patient stay, re-admission rates and use of primary care resources.A recent report from the National Audit Office on trauma care within the UK highlighted rehabilitation as an area of trauma patient care that frequently fell short of the standards expected. The current decline in the economy is likely to impact upon the financial resources available to address these concerns particularly recognising the high dependency on human resources. As a result, those involved in the rehabilitation of injured patients will need to develop new, innovative, cost-effective strategies to improve the current rehabilitation programmes available.These programmes need to intervene early and provide task-orientated training along with high repetition intensity. Such programmes not only test patient motivation, but also frequently demand a high degree of therapist supervision. Efforts logically should therefore focus on designing interventions that engage and motivate patients and encourage increased therapist-independent patient rehabilitation.Virtual reality (VR) offers a possible solution. VR is a technology that allows the user to directly interact with a computer-simulated environment. This technology, developed initially for military training, has now become widely available through video games. The potential for VR interfaces to create an environment that encourages high repetition intensity has been exploited by numerous vocational training programmes, such as laparoscopic surgical skill training. It is now conceivable that computer-based rehabilitation programmes could be developed using current, widely available, affordable virtual reality platforms, such as the Nintendo^® Wii.This review aims to discuss the use of modern computer technology in patient rehabilitation and how this may be applied to trauma patients.     

Hello,can you hear me? Orthopaedic clinic telephone consultations in the COVID-19 era- a patient and clinician perspective

BACKGROUNDThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in seismic changes in healthcare delivery. As a result of this, hospital footfall required to be reduced due to increased risk of transmission of infection. To ensure patients can safely access healthcare, we introduced orthopaedic clinic telephone consultations in our busy district general hospital.AIMTo investigate patients’ and clinicians’ perspective of telephone consultations during COVID-19, and whether this method of consultation could be a viable option in the post- pandemic future. METHODSThis is a single centre, prospective study conducted in a busy National Health Service district general hospital. In May 2020, 100 non- consecutive adult patients were contacted by independent investigators within 48 h of their orthopaedic clinic telephone consultation to complete a telephone satisfaction questionnaire. The questions assessed satisfaction regarding various aspects of the consultation including overall satisfaction and willingness to use this approach long term. Satisfaction and perspective of 25 clinicians conducting these telephone consultations was also assessed via an online survey tool.RESULTS93% of patients were overall satisfied with telephone consultations and 79% were willing to continue this method of consultation post- pandemic. Patients found telephone consultations to reduce personal cost and inconvenience associated with attending a hospital appointment. 72% of clinicians reported overall satisfaction with this service and 80% agreed that telephone consultations should be used in the future. The majority found it less laborious in time and administration in comparison to face to face consultations. Patients and clinicians expressed their desire for video consultations as a method of further improving their experience with remote consultations.CONCLUSIONOur study has shown that telephone consultations are a safe and rapid method of adaptation to the COVID-19 pandemic, achieving the aim of reducing hospital footfall. This method of consultation has resulted in immense clinician and patient satisfaction. Our findings suggest that this tool has benefits in post pandemic healthcare delivery. It has also highlighted that telephone consultations can act as a steppingstone to the introduction of the more complex platform of video consulting.     

Review of orthopaedic trauma surgery during the peak of COVID-19 pandemic – An observational cohort study in the UK

AimThis study aims to estimate the risk of acquiring medical complication or death from COVID-19 infection in patients who were admitted for orthopaedic trauma surgery during the peak and plateau of pandemic. Unlike other recently published studies, where patient-cohort included a more morbid group and cancer surgeries, we report on a group of patients who had limb surgery and were more akin to elective orthopaedic surgery.MethodsThe study included 214 patients who underwent orthopaedic trauma surgeries in the hospital between 12th March and 12th May-2020 when the pandemic was on the rise in the United Kingdom. Data was collected on demographic profile including comorbidities, ASA grade, COVID-19 testing, type of procedures and any readmissions, complications or mortality due to COVID-19.ResultsThere were 7.9% readmissions and 52.9% of it was for respiratory complications. Only one patient had positive COVID-19 test during readmission. 30-day mortality for trauma surgeries was 0% if hip fractures were excluded and 2.8% in all patients. All the mortalities were for proximal femur fracture surgeries and between ASA Grade 3 and 4 or in patients above the age of 70 years.ConclusionThis study suggests that presence of COVID-19 virus in the community and hospital did not adversely affect the outcome of orthopaedic trauma surgeries or lead to excess mortality or readmissions in patients undergoing limb trauma surgery. The findings also support resumption of elective orthopaedic surgeries with appropriate risk stratification, patient optimization and with adequate infrastructural support amidst the recovery phase of the pandemic.     

Is performing joint arthroplasty surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic safe?: A retrospective,cohort analysis from a tertiary centre in NCR,Delhi, India

PurposeResuming joint replacement arthroplasty amidst the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown has come with various challenges that had to be dealt with utmost caution. Patients with severe arthritis experiencing a state of intolerable pain, could not be left unaddressed. Guidelines published by surgical associations, collaborative surgical author groups including public health organisations had to be modified to suit the Indian scenario and obtain optimal functional outcomes in these patients.MethodsA retrospective cohort analysis of 147 patients who underwent arthroplasty during the pandemic (March 2020 to April 2021), for either primary or secondary arthritis, was performed. We assess the efficacy and safety of the newly established Institutional surgical peri-operative protocol at our tertiary care centre in the National Capital Region, India in response to COVID-19 guidelines. The primary outcome measures appraised was 30-day mortality and the secondary outcome measures included length of stay, peri-operative complications and COVID-19 infection.ResultThe most common indication for arthroplasty during the pandemic was neglected trauma. One patient died, due to myocardial infarction during the follow-up period. About 67% of patients were discharged to their usual residence within 7 days of admission. Two patients tested positive for COVID-19 postoperatively, but none required Intensive Care Unit admission.ConclusionJoint replacement arthroplasty can be undertaken safely with diligent patient selection, application of a stringent COVID appropriate behaviour and a ‘ring-fenced’ peri-operative pathway.     

Patient blood management during the COVID–19 pandemic: a narrative review

As COVID–19 disease escalates globally, optimising patient outcome during this catastrophic healthcare crisis is the number one priority. The principles of patient blood management are fundamental strategies to improve patient outcomes and should be given high priority in this crisis situation. The aim of this expert review is to provide clinicians and healthcare authorities with information regarding how to apply established principles of patient blood management during the COVID–19 pandemic. In particular, this review considers the impact of the COVID–19 pandemic on blood supply and specifies important aspects of donor management. We discuss how preventative and control measures implemented during the COVID–19 crisis could affect the prevalence of anaemia, and highlight issues regarding the diagnosis and treatment of anaemia in patients requiring elective or emergency surgery. In addition, we review aspects related to patient blood management of critically ill patients with known or suspected COVID–19, and discuss important alterations of the coagulation system in patients hospitalised due to COVID–19. Finally, we address special considerations pertaining to supply-demand and cost-benefit issues of patient blood management during the COVID–19 pandemic.     

Blunt breast trauma: is there a standard of care?

The incidence of female blunt breast trauma (FBBT) is unknown, and there are no established treatment guidelines. The purpose of this study was to establish the incidence of FBBT, define associated injuries, and develop a treatment algorithm. This is a retrospective analysis of FBBT at a Level I trauma center from October 2000 through December 2008. The incidence, mechanism, and severity of injury, associated injuries, therapeutic interventions, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. A total of 14,499 patients were evaluated. Of these, 13,637 were blunt trauma victims and 5,305 were female blunt trauma victims. One hundred and eight (2%) were diagnosed with FBBT. Although the average injury severity score (ISS) was 12.3 for all FBBT patients, 60 per cent of patients had an ISS > 15. Ninety-four per cent were caused by motor vehicle crashes, with the most common injuries being long bone fractures (45%) and rib fractures (44%). One hundred and one (93.5%) of the injuries were simple hematomas managed expectantly; seven patients (6.5%) had expanding hematomas with radiological evidence of active bleeding that ultimately required invasive procedures, with six of them undergoing arteriogram and four successfully embolized. One patient was taken directly to the operating room for surgical ligation of a bleeding vessel. These data represent the largest series of breast injuries ever reported. Because FBBT is a marker for severe associated injuries, our treatment algorithm recommends that women with radiological evidence of active bleeding who are hemodynamically stable be evaluated with a chest arteriogram plus or minus embolization. However, unstable patients with no other source of hemorrhage should undergo definitive urgent operative repair. All other patients should be managed expectantly.