PROMIS is a Valid Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Patients undergoing ACL Reconstruction with Multi-ligament Knee Reconstruction and Repair Procedures

BackgroundThis study aimed to (1) compare PROMIS with previously validated legacy instruments and (2) to assess between group differences of PROMIS PF-CAT [Physical Function Computer Adaptive Test] for patients undergoing isolated primary ACL reconstruction [ACLR] vs. primary ACL reconstruction with additional ligamentous intervention [MLIK].Level of Evidence: II; Prospective Cohort Study.MethodsAt a single preoperative timepoint, 42 [MLIK] and 73[ACLR] patients completed: Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Mental (MCS) and Physical Component Summary (PCS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) and Marx Knee Scale. Spearman correlation coefficients (non-parametric data) assessed correlations between PROMIS PF-CAT and legacy PROs [Patient-Reported Outcome instruments]. Floor and ceiling effects were assessed using chi-square tests. Between group differences were assessed (Wilcoxon Rank sum test).ResultsPROMIS PF-CAT for the MLIK cohort [Table 2] demonstrated an excellent-good correlation with SF-36 Physical Function (PCS; r = 0.64, p < 0.01), EQ-5D (r = 0.68, p < 0.01), and KOOS Quality of Life (QOL) (r = 0.68, p < 0.01); good correlation with KOOS ADL (r = 0.52, p = 0.01), KOOS Sports (r = 0.44, p < 0.01), KOOS Pain (r = 0.44, p < 0.01) and WOMAC Function (r = 0.52,p = 0.01). PROMIS PF-CAT scores differed for ACL vs. MLIK cohorts (41.9 ± 6.6 vs. 37.6 ± 9.0, p < 0.01). PROMIS PF-CAT demonstrated the fewest floor and ceiling effects [Table 4] versus legacy PRO instruments.ConclusionPROMIS PF-CAT demonstrated strong correlations with previously validated PRO instruments and offers a favorable alternative for patients undergoing ACLR with MLIK repair/reconstruction procedures. Preoperative PROMIS PF-CAT scores were greater for patients undergoing primary ACLR versus MLIK intervention.     

The effect of meniscal pathology and management with ACL reconstruction on patient-reported outcomes,strength, and jump performance ten months post-surgery

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to examine the differences in patient-reported outcome measures, isokinetic strength, plyometric ability and ability to meet return to play criteria ten months after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery between those who underwent meniscectomy, those who underwent meniscal repair and those with no meniscal intervention alongside ACL reconstruction surgery.MethodsThree hundred and thirteen athletes with clinically and radiologically confirmed ACL ruptures were included in this study. Participants were grouped according to their intra-operative procedures (isolated ACL reconstruction surgery n = 155, ACL reconstruction surgery with meniscectomy n = 128, ACL reconstruction surgery with meniscal repair n = 30). Participants completed patient-reported outcome measures questionnaires (Marx Activity Rating Scale, the ACL Return to Sport after Injury and the International Knee Documentation Committee Score) and completed a battery of objective functional testing including isokinetic dynamometry and jump performance testing (countermovement jump and drop jump) between 9 and 11 months after surgery.ResultsNo significant between-group differences were identified in any metric relating to patient-reported outcome measures (p = .611), strength and jump measures (p = .411) or the ability to achieve symmetry-based return to play criteria (p = .575).ConclusionsClinically, these results suggest that concomitant meniscal surgery has no significant effects on patient-reported outcome measures, strength and jump metrics at the return to play stage post-operatively and can inform the pre-operative counselling of those awaiting ACL reconstruction surgery with likely meniscal intervention.     

Type and frequency of healthcare encounters can predict poor surgical outcomes in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients

BackgroundSeveral challenges are associated with collecting clinically meaningful post-operative outcomes. The widespread implementation of electronic medical records (EMR) offers a new opportunity to evaluate surgical outcomes using routinely collected data in these systems. This study evaluated whether surgical outcomes can be ascertained from EMR’s hospital and outpatient encounters. Specifically, we evaluated anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACLR) outcomes.MethodsA retrospective cohort study of 6985 ACLRs performed between 2/2005-9/2012 was conducted. Patient encounters during days 1–90 and days 91–180 after ACLR surgery were the exposures of interest. Nine hospital and eight outpatient encounter types were evaluated. The main endpoint of the study was revision surgery six months after ACLR.ResultsThe cohort was 66.7% male, the mean age was 28 (standard deviation = 11) years-old, and the incidence of revision was 1.5% (n = 105). After adjustments, in days 1–90 post-ACLR, compared to patients with 0–4 orthopedic office visits, patients with 5–9 (hazard ratio (HR) = 9.9, 95% confidence interval(CI), 4.3–23.2) and those with 10 or more (HR = 13.8, 95%CI, 5.6–33.8) visits had a higher risk of revision. In days 91–180, patients with any outpatient hospital encounters (HR = 2.5, 95%CI 1.4–4.5) had a higher risk of revision than patients without visits. Additionally, patients with 4–5 regular office visits (HR = 3.8 times, 95%CI, 2.0–7.0) had a higher risk of revision surgery than those with 0–1 visits.DiscussionThe number of post-operative outpatient visits was associated with ACLR revision surgery. Using EMR encounters to assess surgical outcomes is a viable option for monitoring ACLR patients. The simple assessment of visit types and number of encounters alone can provide valuable information regarding the normal course of rehabilitation of a surgical patient and possible deviation from this normal course. In large cohorts of patients, this type of patient surveillance can assist surgeons with monitoring their patients.     

Return to play testing following anterior cruciate reconstruction – A systematic review & meta-analysis

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to systematically review the evidence regarding return to sport evaluation following ACL reconstruction and evaluate the relationship between testing and secondary ACL injury.MethodsA systematic review of the literature with PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Reviews, was performed on June, 2020 based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were included if they compared outcomes following passing and failing RTP testing subsequent to ACLR. Clinical outcomes were compared, with all statistical analysis performed using Review Manager Version 5.3. Correlation was calculated with Spearman testing.ResultsOverall, 8 studies with 1224 patients were included in the analysis. Overall, 34.3% (420/1224) patients passed the RTP testing. Those who passed the RTP testing had a statistically significant 47% lower rate of ACL graft re-rupture compared to those who did not pass the RTP testing (p = 0.03). However, there was a slightly higher, albeit not statistically significant, rate of contralateral ACL rupture in those who passed the RTP testing compared to those who did not (p = 0.42). There was a strong positive correlation between a high rate of patients passing the ACL RTP testing in studies and ACL graft rupture rate in those who failed (0.80).ConclusionPassing RTP testing following ACLR results in a lower rate of ACL graft rupture, but not contralateral ACL injury. Further evaluation and standardization of RTP testing is necessary in order to increase reliability in identifying patients at risk for re-injury after ACLR.Level of EvidenceLevel of Evidence III.     

A Comparison of Psychological Readiness and Patient-Reported Function Between Sexes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

ContextPostoperative functional and return-to-sport outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) differ by sex. However, whether sex disparities are observed in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) before return to sport after ACLR is unclear.ObjectivesTo compare common PROMs between young men and women who had not yet returned to sport after ACLR.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingUniversity laboratory.Patients or Other ParticipantsForty-five young men (age = 18.7 ± 2.7 years, time since surgery = 6.8 ± 1.4 months) and 45 women matched for age (±1 year) and time since surgery (±1 month; age = 18.8 ± 2.8 years, time since surgery = 6.9 ± 1.4 months) with ACLR participated.Main Outcome Measure(s)Participants completed the Tegner Activity Scale, ACL Return to Sport After Injury scale, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Score, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). The PROMs were compared between men and women using Mann-Whitney U tests. Odds ratios were calculated to evaluate the odds of a male reporting a PROM value above the previously established normative value as compared with a female.ResultsSex differences were present for the IKDC score (P = .01) and KOOS Pain score (P = .04) but not for the Tegner Activity Scale (P = .22), ACL Return to Sport After Injury scale score (P = .78), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia score (P = .64), or other KOOS subscales (P values = .40 to .52). The odds of reporting values above normative levels differed only for the IKDC score (odds ratio = 2.72, 95% confidence interval = 1.16, 6.38).ConclusionsAfter ACLR, young men and women reported similar levels of knee-related function, fear of movement, and readiness for return to sport and were equally likely to meet clinically meaningful normative values before return to sport. Overreliance on patient reports or objective functional outcomes in evaluating patient progress and readiness for return to sport after ACLR may limit clinicians in their ability to comprehensively evaluate and develop individualized interventional approaches that optimize patient outcomes.     

Acute and delayed anterior cruciate ligament repair results in similar short to mid-term outcomes

BackgroundTo assess whether primary repair of proximal ACL tears in the delayed setting leads to similar clinical and functional outcomes as compared to ACL repair in the acute setting.MethodsAll patients with proximal tears with good tissue quality treated in the acute (≤3 weeks post-injury) and delayed setting (>3 months post-injury) were retrospectively reviewed at minimum 2-year follow-up. Ipsilateral reinjury or reoperation and contralateral injury rates were recorded. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Lysholm, modified Cincinnati, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective, Forgotten Joint Score-12, Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Return to Sport after Injury scale, and satisfaction scores. Finally, time to return to work, time to discontinue brace-usage, time to running, and time to return to sports were reviewed. Group differences were compared using chi-square tests and Mann-Whitney U tests.ResultsSixty-nine patients were included, of which 34 (49%) were treated acutely and 35 (51%) in the delayed setting. Besides time from injury to surgery, patient demographics were similar between groups (all p > 0.1). There were three reinjuries (9%) in the acute group and four in the delayed (11%; p > 0.999). Reoperation, complication, and contralateral injury rates were similar between groups (all p > 0.1), while functional outcomes were also comparable (all p > 0.05).ConclusionThis study found that acute and delayed primary ACL repair results in similar clinical and functional outcomes at short to mid-term follow-up. Therefore, the most important factors for repair surgery success seem to be tissue quality and tissue length, rather than acuity of the surgery.Level of evidenceLevel III, retrospective comparative cohort study.     

Lateral extra-articular tenodesis in patients with revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and high-grade anterior knee instability

BackgroundAdditional lateral extra-articular procedures can reduce the risk of failure of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). There is limited evidence on the effect of lateral extra-articular procedures in revision ACL surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) in combination with revision ACLR for combined ACL graft failure and high-grade anterior knee instability.MethodsBetween 2016 and 2018, 75 patients with graft failure after primary ACLR and high-grade anterior knee instability who received revision ACLR were included in the retrospective study. High-grade anterior knee instability was defined as high-grade pivot-shift or side-to-side difference of more than six millimeters in Rolimeter®-testing. An additional modified Lemaire tenodesis was performed in 59 patients during revision ACLR. Seventy-three patients were clinically examined with a minimum of two years after revision surgery.ResultsFailure of the revision ACLR occurred in 8.2% (n = 6) of the cases. LET lead to significant decreased failure rates (five percent vs. 21%, p = .045) and decreased incidence of a positive pivot-shift in patients with revision ACLR and high-grade anterior knee instability in comparison to patients without LET. Also, postoperative functional scores were significantly increased in the group of additional LET.ConclusionsAdditional LET in patients with revision ACLR and high-grade anterior instability significantly reduces the risk of failure of revision ACLR, the incidence of pivot-shift and increases postoperative functional outcome.     

Does concomitant meniscectomy affect medium-term outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A preliminary report

Introduction

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is often accompanied by injuries of the menisci. In order to restore knee stability, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is performed, with meniscus surgery when needed. The purpose of this study was to assess the medium-term outcome of ACLR in subjects with and without concomitant meniscus tear and partial meniscectomy.

Material and methods

We prospectively studied 73 patients after arthroscopically assisted bone-patellar tendon-bone ACLR. Subjects were divided into two subgroups: those who had only ACLR (group A, 54 subjects with mean age 28, (SD 9)) and those who underwent both ACLR and concomitant partial meniscectomy (group B, 19 subjects, mean age 32 [11]). Subjects completed a disease-specific questionnaire, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), preoperatively and at a minimum follow-up of 1 year.

Results

No differences in mean scores between group A and B were observed either preoperatively or at follow-up. We found a significant change in mean score in the KOOS subscale QoL in group A following ACLR (Δ = 9 points, p = 0.039). Most subjects improved in the KOOS subscales Sports and Recreation and QoL in both group A (59 and 52% respectively) and B (63 and 47% respectively). Eight subjects (15%) from group A and 1 (5%) from group B fulfilled criteria of functional recovery. Criteria of treatment failure were fulfilled in 17 subjects (32%) from A and 4 (21%) from group B.

Conclusions

Patients undergoing ACLR with partial meniscectomy had a similar medium-term outcome compared to individuals with ACL tear alone.     

All-inside repair of bucket handle meniscus tears – Mid-term outcomes with postoperative magnetic resonance imaging

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate our results of bucket handle meniscus tear (BHMT) repairs with an all-inside repair technique using postoperative radiological imaging to evaluate meniscus reduction and healing and use them as criteria for evaluation of repair success.MethodsProspective recruitment of 20 patients with 21 BHMT repairs performed with an all-inside technique over a period from 2013 to 2015. All patients had an International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form (SKF), Lysholm Score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Tegner Activity Level Scale obtained pre-operatively and at a minimum of 24 months after surgery. All patients had postoperative knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed between 18 and 24 months after surgery to assess the stability or failure of their repairs. At 5 years after surgery, the patients were assessed with regard to whether they had undergone repeat surgery or not.ResultsAt 2 years, the mean postoperative SKF, Lysholm and KOOS grand scores were 78.9, 88.5 and 86.8, respectively. The mean pre-injury Tegner Activity Scale was 7.6 and postoperatively it was 6.0. There was a significant difference in all pre- and postoperative outcome scores (P < 0.01).The postoperative MRIs showed that 19 of the 21 BHMT repairs had stable reduction of the tear fragment and two patients had displacement of the torn bucket handle fragment. At 5 years, one patient had undergone revision surgery.ConclusionBHMTs can be repaired with all-inside techniques with good results and successful outcomes.     

Passing return to sports tests after ACL reconstruction is associated with greater likelihood for return to sport but fail to identify second injury risk

BackgroundA limited number of patients return to sport (RTS) after an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and patients who RTS have a relatively high risk for second ACL injury. The purpose of the current study was to compare the results of a test battery between patients who returned to the pre-injury level of sport (RTS group) and patients who did not (NO-RTS group).It was hypothesized that the RTS group showed better test results.MethodsSixty-four patients (age 27.8 ± 8.8 years) were included. The results of a multicomponent test battery (jump-landing task assessed with the Landing Error Scoring System (LESS), three hop tests, isokinetic strength test for quadriceps and hamstring) were compared between groups with a 2 × 2 ANOVA.ResultsThe RTS group showed a significantly lower LESS score (p = 0.010), significantly higher absolute scores on hop tests with both legs (injured leg: single leg hop test p = 0.013, triple leg hop test p = 0.024, side hop test p = 0.021; non-injured leg: single leg hop test p = 0.011, triple leg hop test p = 0.023, side hop test p = 0.032) and significantly greater hamstring strength in the injured leg (p = 0.009 at 60°/s, p = 0.012 at 180°/s and p = 0.013 at 300°/s). No differences in test results were identified between patients who sustained a second ACL injury and patients who did not.ConclusionPatients after ACLR with better jump-landing patterns, hop performance and greater hamstring strength have greater likelihood for RTS. However, our findings show that RTS criteria fail to identify patients who are at risk for a second ACL injury.     

Influence of selected plane on the evaluation of tibial tunnel locations using a three-dimensional bone model in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of a selected plane on the evaluation of tibial tunnel locations following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) between two planes: the plane parallel to the tibial plateau (Plane A) and the plane perpendicular to the proximal tibial shaft axis (Plane B).MethodsThirty-four patients who underwent double-bundle ACLR were included. Three-dimensional model of tibia was created using computed tomography images 2 weeks postoperatively, and tibial tunnels of the anteromedial bundle (AMB) and posterolateral bundle (PLB) were extracted. To evaluate tibial tunnel locations, two planes (Planes A and B) were created. The locations of the tibial tunnel apertures of each bundle were evaluated using a grid method and compared between Planes A and B. The difference in coronal alignment between Planes A and B were also assessed.ResultsThe AMB and PLB tunnel apertures in Plane A were significantly more laterally located than in Plane B (mean difference; AMB, 1.5%; PLB, 1.7%, P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in the anteroposterior direction between the planes. Coronal alignment difference between the planes was 16.8 ± 2.2°; Plane B was more valgus than Plane A.ConclusionAlthough tibial tunnel locations were not significantly influenced by the selected planes in the AP direction, subtle but statistically significant differences were found in the ML direction between the Planes A and B in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The findings suggest that both Planes A and B can be used in the assessment of tibial tunnel locations after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.     

Association between time from anterior cruciate ligament injury to reconstruction and morphological changes of the intercondylar notch using MRI and arthroscopy

BackgroundFew studies have measured the dimensions of intercondylar notch under direct arthroscopic visualization. The purpose of our study was to analyse the association between time from anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury to reconstruction and the morphological changes of intercondylar notch using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopy.MethodsData was collected for patients who received knee arthroscopic surgery during 2014–2015. According to the time from ACL injury to reconstruction, these patients were divided into five groupsACL non-injured group (NI), acute rupture group (AR, <3 months), chronic rupture group 1 (CR1, 3–12 months), 2 (CR2, 1–5 years) and 3 (CR3, >5 years). MRI measurements of femoral condylar width (FCW) and intercondylar width (ICW) were undertaken before surgery. The widths at the base, middle and top of the intercondylar notch (ICWb, ICWm, ICWt, respectively) and the intercondylar notch height (ICH) were measured during arthroscopy. Intercondylar notch width index (NWI) and notch shape index (NSI) were then calculated and analysed among groups.ResultsA total of 272 patients were allocated to groups NI (n = 89), AR (n = 84), CR1 (n = 51), CR2 (n = 30) or CR3 (n = 18). Statistical analysis showed significant differences in ICW, ICWb, ICH, NWI and NSI between groups NI and AR. Among the groups with ACL-injury, ICWb and ICWt and NWI in group CR3 were statistically smaller than the other three groups (P = 0.004, 0.016, and 0.005, respectively).ConclusionsThe width of intercondylar notch had a negative correlation with time from ACL injury to reconstruction. Significant secondary notch stenosis was observed over 5 years after ACL rupture.     

Knee extensor strength,hop performance,patient-reported outcome and inter-test correlation in patients 9–12 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BackgroundHop performance and isokinetic knee extensor strength (IKES) asymmetry are associated with re-injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This study investigated deficits after ACLR, and which hop tests are most correlated with IKES and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).Methods50 patients were assessed 9–12 months after ACLR using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and ACL Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scores. Peak IKES and eight hop tests were assessed: single (SHD), triple (THD) and triple crossover (TCHD) hop for distance, 6 m timed hop (6MTH), single medial (MHD) and single lateral (LHD) hop for distance, single countermovement jump (SLCMJ) and timed speedy hop (SHT). The percentage of patients with limb symmetry indices (LSIs) < 90% was reported. Pearson’s correlations investigated the correlation between PROMs, IKES and hop LSIs.ResultsThe majority (80%) of patients had IKES LSIs < 90%. While 12–14% of patients demonstrated LSIs < 90% for the SHD, 6MTH, THD and TCHD, 52–80% demonstrated LSIs < 90% for the other hop tests. The IKES LSI was significantly different (p < 0.05) from all hop LSIs, besides the SLCMJ (p = 0.638). Large correlations were only observed between the IKES LSI and the SLCMJ (r = 0.82), MHD (r = 0.71) and LHD (r = 0.53). The SLCMJ, MHD and IKES LSIs demonstrated the largest significant correlations with the IKDC (r = 0.51–0.53) and ACL-RSI (r = 0.38–0.40).ConclusionsHop tests such as the MHD and SLCMJ may present a more practical alternative to quantifying peak IKES, especially in the absence of more sophisticated testing equipment. While not surrogates as such, these selective hop measures may better inform the clinician as to whether significant underlying quadriceps deficits are still present throughout the post-operative rehabilitation period.     

Self-reported outcomes are associated with knee strength and functional symmetry in individuals who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between self-reported knee outcomes and limb symmetry indices (LSIs) for hip and knee strength, postural control and single-leg hop distance in individuals who had undergone an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction via hamstring tendon autograft (HTG).

Isometric dynamometry,dependent on knee angle,is a suitable alternative to isokinetic dynamometry when evaluating quadriceps strength symmetry in patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BackgroundKnee extensor strength deficits increase re-injury risk following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This study investigated whether isometric strength testing methods are a suitable alternative to isokinetic assessment for identifying knee extensor strength asymmetry.MethodsThis study recruited 22 patients at 9–12 months after ACLR and 22 healthy controls. The single hop for distance (SHD) and knee extensor strength via isokinetic (60°/s and 120°/s) and isometric (positions of 90°, 60° and 30° of flexion, from full knee extension) methods were assessed. Absolute scores (normalized to body weight) and limb symmetry indices (LSIs) were calculated, with t-tests employed for statistical comparisons.ResultsThe SHD LSI was significantly higher (p < 0.01) than both isokinetic speeds and the 30° isometric position. No significant LSI differences (p > 0.01) existed within isokinetic or isometric test conditions. In ACLR patients, only the 60°/s isokinetic condition was significantly lower (p = 0.005) than the 60° isometric condition. When normalized to body weight, the operated limb in ACLR patients was significantly weaker than the non-operated limb during peak isokinetic strength testing at 60°/s (p = 0.001) and 120°/s (p = 0.010), as well as isometric testing at 30° (p = 0.009). Compared with controls, ACLR patients demonstrated significantly lower (p < 0.01) mean LSIs across most measures.ConclusionsAssessment of knee extensor strength via isometric methods appears suitable in the absence of isokinetic testing equipment, though consideration of test angle (30° and 90° knee angles better detect asymmetries similar to isokinetic testing) is important.     

Clinical outcomes of primary anatomic all-inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction using the TransLateral technique: A minimum one-year follow-up study

BackgroundAnatomic all-inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction using the TransLateral technique is relatively new. This technique utilises single tendon autograft and instruments permitting inside-to-out drilling to create retrograde sockets. Few studies have investigated clinical outcomes following this technique. We investigate clinical outcomes in patients who underwent primary anatomic all-inside ACL reconstruction using the TransLateral technique with a minimum one-year follow-up.MethodsInterrogation of our prospectively maintained database identified patients who underwent surgery from June 2013 to December 2017. Patients were followed up clinically and using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) including EQ-5D, KOOS, IKDC and Tegner scores from the National Ligament Registry. Paired two-tailed Student t-test was used to assess for clinical significance.ResultsOne hundred forty-one cases with a mean age of 30 years (range 16.0–60.2) and mean follow-up of 17.4 months (12.1–75.2) were included. Grafts included isolated quadrupled semitendinosus (n = 115) and both quadrupled semitendinosus and gracilis (n = 26). One hundred and two patients (72.3%) had complete peri-operative PROMS. Mean increases in EQ-5D VAS and IKDC scores were 18.9 and 29.2 points (p < 0.001). Significant peri-operative improvements were observed for all KOOS domains (p < 0.001). Median Tegner activity score increased by two levels (p < 0.001). Incidence of graft re-rupture was 5.7% (n = 8), all were following significant knee trauma and seven cases were mid-bundle femoral tunnel placements.ConclusionsAll-inside ACL reconstruction using the TransLateral technique demonstrates good clinical and functional outcomes with low complication and failure rate. Mid-bundle femoral tunnel placements have been abandoned in favour of placement deep within the anteromedial bundle footprint.     

Evaluation of proprioception in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction: measurement in functional position

Background/aimAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries cause mechanoreceptor loss in the joint; therefore, proprioceptive deficits are observed after injury. In particular, proprioceptive measurements made in the functional position give more accurate results, and this is an area that requires further studies. This study aimed to evaluate proprioception in patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction (ACLR) in functional positions used in daily life (closed kinetic chain position), according to joint angles where ACL injuries occur more frequently, in comparison with healthy controls.Materials and methodsThirty-four participants who underwent ACLR using a hamstring tendon graft (aged 29.18 ± 8.16 years; body mass index (BMI), 26.58 ± 4.02 kg/cm²) and 31 healthy participants (aged 27.35 ± 5.74 years; BMI, 24.76 ± 2.98 kg/cm²) were included. Proprioception was assessed with an active angle repetition test, using an inclinometer in the closed kinetic chain position while standing. Participants were asked to perform single-leg squats until the angle at the knee joint was 30°. After the targeted angle was defined, the participants were asked to find the targeted angle. The difference between the targeted angle and the angle reached by the participants was calculated.ResultsA statistically significant difference in the active joint position sense was found among the ACLR extremity, uninvolved extremity, and control extremity (p < 0.05). The proprioceptive sense between the two extremities in the ACLR group was similar, and the proprioceptive sense was worse than that of the control group.ConclusionTo our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate closed kinetic chain position in patients who underwent ACLR, and it showed that proprioceptive sense was still poor in patients with ACLR compared with the control group, even if an average of 24 months have elapsed since surgery.     

Trauma mechanism and patient reported outcome in tibial plateau fractures with posterior involvement

IntroductionPosterior tibial plateau fractures (PTPF) have a high impact on functional outcome and the optimal treatment strategy is not well established. The goal of this study was to assess the relationship between trauma mechanism, fracture morphology and functional outcome in a large multicenter cohort and define possible strategies to improve the outcome.MethodsAn international retrospective cohort study was conducted in five level-1 trauma centers. All consecutive operatively treated PTPF were evaluated. Preoperative imaging was reviewed to determine the trauma mechanism. Patient reported outcome was scored using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS).ResultsA total of 145 tibial plateau fractures with posterior involvement were selected with a median follow-up of 32.2 months (IQR 24.1–43.2). Nine patients (6%) sustained an isolated posterior fracture. Seventy-two patients (49%) sustained a two-column fracture and three-column fractures were diagnosed in 64 (44%) patients. Varus trauma was associated with poorer outcome on the ‘symptoms’ (p = 0.004) and ‘pain’ subscales (p = 0.039). Delayed-staged surgery was associated with worse outcome scores for all subscales except ‘pain’. In total, 27 patients (18%) were treated with posterior plate osteosynthesis without any significant difference in outcome.ConclusionsFracture morphology, varus trauma mechanism and delayed-staged surgery (i.e. extensive soft-tissue injury) were identified as important prognostic factors on postoperative outcome in PTPF. In order to assess possible improvement of outcome, future studies with routine preoperative MRI to assess associated ligamentous injury in tibial plateau fractures (especially for varus trauma) are needed.     

One-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in cases with excessive tunnel osteolysis. Results of a new technique using impaction bone grafting

Background

This level IV study describes a new one-stage procedure for revision ACL reconstruction in cases with extreme tunnel widening.