Patellar cartilage loss does not affect early outcomes of total knee arthroplasty performed without patella resurfacing

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to compare the outcomes and cost economics of TKA without patella resurfacing in patients with and without patellar cartilage loss.MethodsProspective case control study of 209 consecutive patients undergoing TKA without patella resurfacing. Patella cartilage status was documented intra-operatively: 108 patients had patella cartilage loss (mean age 70 ± 9.7, mean BMI 31 ± 6.2, 72 (67%) female) and 101 control patients did not (age 68 ± 9.2, BMI 31 ± 5.6, 52 (51%) female). The primary outcome measure was Oxford Knee Score (OKS) improvement at one year. Secondary outcomes included OKS, EQ-5D, anterior knee pain (AKP), Kujala scores and reoperation at 2–4 years. The cost to prevent secondary patella resurfacing was calculated.ResultsThere were more women in the patella cartilage loss group (67% Vs 51%, p = 0.037), but no other preoperative characteristics differed. There was no difference in OKS improvement between those with and without patella cartilage loss at 1 year (mean difference −1.03, −3.68 to 1.62 95%CI, p = 0.446) or 2–4 years (mean difference 1.52, −1.43 to 4.45 95%CI, p = 0.310). At 2–4 years there was no difference in AKP (14/87 with vs 17/80 without, p = 0.430) nor Kujala score (mean difference 2.66, −3.82 to 9.13 95%CI, p = 0.418). Routine patella resurfacing would have cost £58,311 to prevent one secondary resurfacing.ConclusionThere was no difference in OKS, anterior knee pain, reoperation or Kujala scores up to 2–4 years between patients with and without patellar cartilage loss following TKA without patella resurfacing. Resurfacing for this indication would not have been a cost effective intervention.     

The Relationship between HIF-2α and VEGF with Radiographic Severity in the Primary Osteoarthritic Knee

PurposeThe aim of this study was to determine the relationship of hypoxia-inducible factor-2 (HIF-2α) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) with radiographic severity in primary osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. Expression of these two factors in cartilage samples from OA knee joints was examined at mRNA and protein levels.ResultsCartilage degeneration correlated with the radiographic severity grade. OA severity, determined using the Mankin scale, correlated positively with the KL grade (r=0.8790, p<0.01), and HIF-2α and VEGF levels with the radiographic severity of knee OA (r=0.7001, p<0.05; r=0.6647, p<0.05).ConclusionIn OA cartilage, HIF-2α and VEGF mRNA and protein levels were significantly and positively correlated. The expression of both factors correlated positively with the KL grade. HIF-2α and VEGF, therefore, may serve as biochemical markers as well as potential therapeutic targets in knee OA.     

Radiographic evaluation of knee osteoarthritis in predicting outcomes after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy

BackgroundKnee osteoarthritis (OA) severity is a predictor of outcomes after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) grading of OA is predictive of postoperative outcomes; this prospective study assessed whether radiographic grading is also predictive of outcomes.MethodsPatients who underwent APM between February 2015 and January 2016, underwent radiography and MRI ≤ 6 months before surgery, and had outcomes from the surgery date and one year later were included. Surgical failure was defined as < 10-point improvement in the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score pain subscore. Radiographs were evaluated using Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading and continuous and ordinal minimum joint space width (mJSW) measurements; cartilage loss on MRI was evaluated using a modified Outerbridge system. Predictive abilities were estimated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsThe study cohort included 66 knees from 64 patients (32 women; mean age, 57.1 years; range, 45–77). Radiographic grading was not predictive of outcomes (KL, AUC = 0.541 [95% CI: 0.358, 0.724]; continuous mJSW, AUC = 0.482 [95% CI: 0.305, 0.659]; ordinal mJSW, AUC = 0.534 [95% CI: 0.433, 0.634]). Comparison of radiographs showing no joint space narrowing (KL grade 0–2) with corresponding MR images demonstrated that 48% of radiographs missed a clinically significant lesion (modified Outerbridge grade ≥ 3). MRI grading was predictive of outcomes (AUC = 0.720 [95% CI: 0.581, 0.859]).ConclusionsRadiographic grading of OA is not predictive of outcomes after APM; radiographs may miss clinically significant lesions. For outcome prediction, MRI should be used.     

The oxford knee score minimal clinically important difference for revision total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundMinimal clinically important difference (MCID) is crucial for interpreting meaningful improvements in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). No previous study has evaluated the MCID for the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to propose the OKS MCID for revision TKA.MethodsProspectively collected data from 191 patients who underwent revision TKA at a single institution was analysed. Clinical assessment was performed preoperatively and at 2 years using OKS and Short-Form 36 Physical Component Score (SF-36 PCS). MCID was evaluated with a three-pronged methodology, using (1) anchor-based method with linear regression, (2) anchor-based method with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under curve (AUC), (3) distribution-based method with standard deviation (SD). The anchors used were improvement in SF-36 PCS ≥ 12, patient satisfaction, and implant survivorship following revision TKA.ResultsThe MCID determined by anchor-based linear regression method using improvements in SF-36 PCS was 4.9 points. The MCID determined by anchor-based ROC was 10.5 points for satisfaction (AUC = 74.8%) and 13.5 points for implant survivorship (AUC = 73.7%). The MCID determined by distribution-based method of 0.5 SD was 4.7.ConclusionThe proposed MCID for OKS following revision TKA is 4.9 points. Patients who achieve an improvement in OKS of at least 10.5–13.5 points by 2 years are likely to be satisfied with their surgery and not require a subsequent re-revision TKA. Patients undergoing revision TKA should aim for an improvement in OKS of at least 10.5–13.5 points as a target score.     

Wiberg Type III patellae and J-sign during extension compromise outcomes of total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing

BackgroundUnderstanding the risk factors associated with postoperative pain and worse outcome can guide surgeons on whether primary patellar resurfacing is warranted during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to determine whether clinical scores and pain after TKA without patellar resurfacing are correlated with patellar shape and postoperative patellar position and kinematics.MethodsRadiographs as well as anterior knee pain according to the Visual Analogue Scale (pVAS) were collected pre- and postoperatively for 100 knees aged 68 ± 7.7 years that received uncemented TKA without patellar resurfacing. At a minimum follow-up of 12 months the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) as well as the flexion range of motion and the presence of J-sign during active extension were recorded. Uni- and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to determine associations between the collected clinical scores and patient demographic and radiographic data.ResultsPostoperative OKS (79 ± 14.4) was worse for Wiberg Type III patellae (β = − 11.4, P = .020, compared with Type II). Anterior pVAS (2 ± 2) was greater in knees with J-sign during extension (β = 2.8, P < .001). None of the other radiographic measurements (patellar tilt, congruence angle and lateral patellar displacement) were correlated with postoperative OKS or anterior pVAS.ConclusionIncongruent patellar shape (Wiberg Type III) is associated with worse clinical scores, and abnormal kinematics (J-sign) with increased pain after TKA without patellar resurfacing. The authors therefore recommend routine resurfacing for Wiberg Type III patellae, though further studies are required to confirm whether resurfacing truly improves clinical scores and pain in this subgroup.     

Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction following revision of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty are as good as a primary total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundWith unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) being increasingly performed for medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee, revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for failed UKA is expected to increase. Our primary aim is to evaluate patients in our tertiary institution who underwent revision of failed UKA to TKA to compare their pre-operative clinical scores (patient-reported outcome measures, PROMs) to those of primary TKA.MethodsRetrospective review of our institutional arthroplasty registry between 2001 and 2014 was performed. We identified 70 patients who underwent revision of UKA to TKA. The revision UKA to TKA patients was matched with 140 patients who underwent primary TKA for OA in terms of preoperative demographics, gender, age at time of surgery, body mass index (BMI), primary surgeon, and PROMs. Intra-operative data and postoperative complications or re-revision surgeries performed were reviewed.ResultsIn the revision UKA to TKA group, more stems, augments or constrained implants were used compared to primary TKA. A greater proportion of patients with metal-backed UKA revision to TKA required stems, augments or constrained implants as compared to all-polyethylene UKA revision to TKA, but not a significant proportion (P = 0.250). At two years postoperatively, there were no significant differences observed between the groups in terms of patient satisfaction and PROMs.ConclusionsThis study showed similar outcomes following revision of failed UKA to TKA and primary TKA. There were significant improvements in PROMs for revision UKA to TKA, which is comparable to that of primary TKA.     

Association between pain catastrophizing,physical function and pain at first visit in the outpatient knee clinic

BackgroundPain catastrophizing has been associated with pain severity and disability in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, the literature is not consistent and other studies have failed to find this association. We examined the preoperative association between pain catastrophizing and physical function and pain, as well as the correlation between radiographic OA and physical symptoms and knee arthroplasty (KA).MethodsThis study was a cross-sectional study of all patients referred to the orthopaedic outpatient Knee Clinic from March to October 2013 with clinical symptoms of knee OA. Prior to clinical examination, the patients completed EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), The Short Form-36 (SF-36 (PF)), The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). The severity of radiographic OA was graded with the Kellgren–Lawrence Scale (KLS).ResultsOf the 325 patients, 158 (48.6%) patients received a knee arthroplasty, 130 (40%) were treated conservatively, and 37 (11.4%) were scheduled for a knee arthroscopy. Mean age was 64.3 (SD 11.1) years and 53.9% were females. We found a strong correlation between PCS and OKS (r = ? 0.60, P = 0.000). Furthermore, the regression analysis showed statistically significant associations between PCS and both physical function and pain. We found no correlation between radiographic OA and physical function or pain.ConclusionsOur results reveal that PCS is an important psychological factor when dealing with patients with OA. Furthermore, our results confirm the importance of a combined evaluation of symptoms, clinical examination, and radiographs when deciding on the right treatment for individual knee patients.     

Inferior outcomes of total knee replacement in early radiological stages of osteoarthritis

BackgroundTotal knee replacement (TKR) for osteoarthritis (OA) is a common and successful operation; the severity of radiographic changes plays a key role as to when it should be performed. This study investigates whether an early radiological grade of OA has an adverse effect on the outcome of TKR in patients with arthroscopically confirmed OA.MethodsBetween January 2006 and January 2011 data was collected prospectively on all patients undergoing a primary TKR for OA. We included all patients with a Kellgren–Lawrence score of two or less on their pre-operative radiograph who had had an arthroscopy to confirm significant OA. Our primary outcomes were the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and a satisfaction rating.ResultsOver the study period 1708 primary TKRs were performed in 1381 patients. We identified 44 TKRs in 43 patients with a Kellgren–Lawrence score of two or less on their pre-operative radiograph. In this group the mean age was 63 years, 66% were female and the mean BMI was 31.7 kg/m². At a mean follow-up of 37 months the mean OKS was only 30 points compared to 36 in all TKRs performed over the same period (p = 0.0004). Only 68% were either satisfied or very satisfied. Eight knees (18%) underwent further surgery, three (6.8%) of which were revision procedures, compared to a revision rate of 1.6% in all patients.ConclusionThe outcomes of TKR in patients with early radiological changes of OA are inferior to those with significant radiological changes and should be performed with caution.Level of evidenceLevel IV case-series.     

Painful total knee arthroplasty: Infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve selective denervation. A case series

Introduction: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a reliable and widespread solution for knee osteoarthritis treatment, but about 20% of the patients complains of persisting pain. Neuroma formation in the IPBSN (infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve) is an undervalued cause of persistent anterior pain after TKA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the selective neuroma denervation on patients satisfaction and pain improvement.Matherial and methods: Between 2014 and 2020, we evaluated 13 patients suffering from persistent anterior knee pain and numbness after TKA who underwent a surgical neurectomy of the IPBSN. After clinical assessment and diagnosis confirmation, we carried out the surgery. Short Form 12 Health (SF12), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) have been collected before and after the procedure. After the surgical treatment, the symptom's resolution and patients’ satisfaction were attested by the achievement of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of the self-administered patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).Results: Our results showed a statistically significant improvement (p < 0.05) of patients pain perception (mean NRS improvement –4.2, SD 2.5) and overall satisfaction (with a mean increase in OKS of 14.5 points SD 9.4, and in SF12 of 6.5 points SD 4.0).Conclusions: Hence, our study suggests that selective neuroma denervation may be an effective solution to improve the quality of life of patients who develop this complication after TKA.     

Early postoperative predictors of satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundDespite the excellent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) results reported using traditional outcome measures, dissatisfaction rates of up to 30% are reported following surgery. Although several preoperative factors have been identified as possible predictors of satisfaction, there is conflicting evidence. Identification of dissatisfaction in the early postoperative assessment may therefore be an alternative consideration.MethodsWe examined the relationship between 12-month satisfaction, and early post-operative outcomes in a cohort of 486 TKA patients. Preoperative, and postoperative outcome measures at 3- and 12-months (Oxford knee score, pain score, SF12, and knee motion), were analysed and compared between patients who were satisfied and dissatisfied at 12-months following TKA. Mean scores, and postoperative change in scores were calculated. Postoperative outcomes were examined for correlation with satisfaction, and multivariate logistic regression models used to identify potential predictors of dissatisfaction.ResultsOverall satisfaction was 77.0%. No preoperative differences were observed between groups. Dissatisfaction was associated with worse postoperative status across all outcome measures (p < 0.001), except the 3-month SF12-physical component (p = 0.052). Dissatisfied patients demonstrated minimal further improvement or even worsening of outcome scores between 3- and 12-months postoperatively (p < 0.02). Both the 3-month OKS (OR = 1.15, p < 0.001), and knee flexion (OR = 1.03, p = 0.009) were significant predictors of subsequent 12-month satisfaction.ConclusionsDissatisfaction following TKA is associated with worse outcomes as early as 3 months following surgery, with minimal further improvement subsequently achieved at 12-months. Early postoperative assessment following TKA should therefore be considered, including clinical assessment, to identify those patients at risk of dissatisfaction.     

There is no clinically important difference in the Oxford knee scores between one and two years after total knee arthroplasty: The one-year score could be used as the benchmark timepoint to assess outcome

BackgroundThe aim was to assess the whether there was a clinically important change in the Oxford knee score (OKS) between one and two years after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and to identify predictors associated with a clinically important change.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was undertaken using an established arthroplasty database of 5857 primary TKA. Patient demographics, body mass index, social deprivation, OKS and EuroQoL five-domain (EQ-5D) score were collected preoperatively and at one and two years postoperatively. A clinically important change in the OKS was defined as ≥ 5 points.ResultsThere was a 0.2 point increase in the OKS between one and two years, which was statistically significant (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1 to 0.4, p < .0001), but not clinically important. A better preoperative OKS (p < .001) and in contrast a worse one year OKS (p < .001) were independently associated with a greater improvement from one to two years. There were 1006 (17.3%) patients that had a clinically important improvement in the OKS between one and two years. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that a one year OKS of less than 35 was a reliable predictor of a clinically important improvement between one and two years (area under the curve 0.77, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.78, p < .001).ConclusionThere was not a clinically important change in the OKS from one to two years after TKA when assessed as a group. However, individual patients with a one year OKS of less than 35 may demonstrate a clinically important improvement at two years.Level of evidence: Retrospective diagnostic study, Level III.     

Survivorship of constrained polyethylene inserts in primary total knee replacements

BackgroundVarus–valgus constrained (VVC) inserts are used in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) when stability cannot be achieved with a traditional insert. Concern has been raised regarding premature loosening and failure of these primary TKAs due to the increased load transfer through the prosthesis. This study seeks to assess the survival, clinical outcomes and radiographic assessment of VVC total knee inserts used in a single primary TKA system without diaphyseal stem extensions.MethodsA consecutive cohort of 74 primary TKAs with VVC inserts was identified from an institutional database. A two-to-one matched group of 136 posterior-stabilized (PS) primary TKAs was generated from the same database. Survival analysis was assessed for all-cause revision surgery. Patient outcome measures were the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and patient reported satisfaction. Radiographs were assessed in accordance with the Knee Society radiographic scoring system for radiolucency.ResultsSurvival rates at three and five years were 98.1% and 95.1% for the VVC liner group and 98.1% and 98.1% for the PS liner group, respectively. OKS improved from pre-op to post-op for both groups (p < .001). OKS was reduced in the VVC liner group compared to the PS liner group at latest available follow-up (p = .012). However, clinical satisfaction rates did not differ between the two groups. Small, non-progressive radiolucent lines existed on several radiographs; however, no components in either group were deemed radiographically loose.ConclusionThe survivorship, clinical, and radiographic outcomes of VVC knees were similar to the PS comparison group at short- to mid-term follow-up.     

Relationships between early postoperative gait biomechanical factors and patient-reported outcome measures 6 months after total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundThis study was focused on the gait parameters of the knee extensor and hip abductor muscle groups, which are believed to contribute to knee joint function improvement in early postoperative TKA. The associations between patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) 6 months after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and the early postoperative internal knee extension moment, knee extension negative joint power, and internal hip abduction moment while walking were investigated.MethodsTwenty-one patients who underwent primary TKA for knee osteoarthritis were included. Three weeks after TKA, gait at a comfortable speed was measured by three-dimensional motion analysis. The lower limb joint angle, internal joint moment, and joint power parameters on the operated side while standing were calculated. The PROMs 6 months after TKA were assessed using the Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure (JKOM). The relationship between each gait biomechanical parameter and the JKOM was determined.ResultsThe maximum internal knee extension moment and maximum knee extension negative joint power during the early stance showed moderate negative correlations with the JKOM scores. The maximum internal hip abduction moment was not correlated with the JKOM scores. The maximum internal hip extension moment during the early stance and internal hip flexion moment during the late stance showed moderate negative correlations with the total JKOM scores.ConclusionThe early postoperative internal knee extension moment, maximum knee extension negative joint power, and internal hip extension and flexion moment are associated with patient PROMs 6 months after TKA.     

Long-term results of revision total knee arthroplasty using a rotating hinge implant

BackgroundRotating hinge implants are commonly used in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the setting of significant ligamentous instability or bone deficiency. These highly constrained implants have been associated with variable clinical outcomes and uncertain long-term survivorship. The aim of this study is to establish long-term functional outcomes, radiographic results, and survivorship after revision TKA with a rotating hinge implant.MethodThis is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data of 41 consecutive patients undergoing revision TKA with rotating hinge components and minimum 10-years follow-up. The study included 22 females (53.7%) and 19 males (46.3%) with a mean age of 66.6 ± 8.5 years. Clinical outcomes recorded included the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) preoperatively and at latest follow-up. Range of motion, implant survivorship, and complications were also recorded. Predefined radiological outcomes were obtained using plain radiographs.ResultsThere was a significant improvement in OKS after revision TKA with a rotating hinge implant compared to preoperative scores (40.7 ± 4.2 vs. 21.4 ± 4.9 respectively, p < 0.001). At latest follow-up, mean range of motion was 111.5° ± 9.3° and mean overall limb alignment was 0.2° ± 2.0° varus. Implant survivorship at minimum 10-year follow-up was 90.2%. Radiographic lucent lines were observed in 14 patients (34.1%).ConclusionRevision TKA with a rotating hinge implant leads to satisfactory clinical outcomes and very good implant survivorship at long-term follow-up. Surgeons should have a low threshold to use these versatile implants in complex revision knee arthroplasty.     

Does preoperative anxiety and depression predict satisfaction after total knee replacement?

Background and purposeApproximately one fifth of patients are not satisfied with the outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Preoperative variables associated with poorer outcomes are severity and chronicity of pain, psychological disease, poor coping strategies and pain catastrophisation. Psychological disease may be expressed as anxiety and depression. It is unclear whether anxiety and depression before TKA are constitutional or result from knee pain. The aim of this study was to explore the association of anxiety and depression with knee pain and function using specific outcome measures.MethodsForty consecutive patients undergoing TKA completed Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD) and Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.ResultsThe HAD and OKS significantly improved post-operatively (p < 0.001). There was a greater change between the preoperative and postoperative scores in the OKS than the HAD. The severity of preoperative anxiety and depression was associated with higher levels of knee disability (coefficient ? 0.409, p = 0.009). Postoperatively reduction in anxiety and depression was associated with improvement in knee disability after 3 (coefficient ? 0.459, p = 0.003) and 6 months (coefficient ? 0.428, p = 0.006).InterpretationThe difficulty in interpreting preoperative anxiety and depression and the outcome of TKA is establishing whether they are the cause or effect of pain in the knee. As anxiety and depression improve with knee pain and function, this study suggests that knee pain contributes to the psychological symptoms and that a successful TKA offers an excellent chance of improving both.     

Ten-year outcomes of a nitrided Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy fixed-bearing total knee replacement with a highly crosslinked polyethylene-bearing in patients with metal allergy

BackgroundMetal hypersensitivity in patients with a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a rare condition and a very controversial topic. Despite the lack of data concerning the real effective impact of allergy on TKA failures, most of the manufactures offer the choice of ‘non-allergenic’ implants both for primary and revision TKA, some of which provide the same designs and surgical techniques as the conventional ones. Only a few studies are available on outcomes on these ‘hypersensitivity-friendly’ implants and even fewer specifically on allergic patients with a mid- to long-term follow-up.MethodsBetween 2007 and 2015, we enrolled 72 patients (57 females, 15 males), who underwent TKA treated with a non-allergenic posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee implant for a declared and proven metal allergy.Patients were followed clinically and radiographically for a mean 10 years of follow-up.ResultsWith revision as an endpoint the Kaplan–Meier survival estimate showed a survival rate of 97.2% at five years and 95.1% at 10 years. Significant improvements in range of motion (ROM), Knee Society Scoring (KSS) and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee scores were registered at final follow-up (P < 0.0001). At final follow-up validated Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) showed the following scores: Oxford Knee Score (OKS) 42.1, EQ5D 0.80, EQ VAS 80.1, Forgotten Joint Score 71.2.ConclusionsThis nitrided Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy fixed-bearing total knee replacement with a highly crosslinked polyethylene-bearing showed interesting results and survival rates in patients with metal allergy at mid- to long-term follow-up.     

Usefulness of gait parameters obtained from inertial sensors attached to the lower trunk and foot for assessment of gait performance in the early postoperative period after total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundThis study was performed to (i) compare gait parameters obtained from inertial sensors attached to the lower trunk and foot between patients in the early postoperative period after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and healthy age- and sex-matched controls and (ii) elucidate the association between the gait parameters and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).MethodThe gait performance of 19 patients who had undergone TKA was assessed using inertial sensors and PROMs obtained from the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) 1 week before hospital discharge. The patients walked along a 15-m walkway and we calculated the following gait parameters: walking speed, coefficient of variation (CV) of stride time, unbiased autocorrelation coefficient (AC), harmonic ratio (HR), and symmetry index (SI). The same gait parameter data from 19 age- and sex-matched healthy adults (controls) were obtained from our past study.ResultsThe TKA group demonstrated slower walking speed, larger CV of stride time, lower HR in all three directions, lower AC in the vertical direction, and higher SI in the vertical direction than the healthy control group (all p < 0.05). Correlation analysis revealed that the SI in the anteroposterior direction was significantly correlated with the KOOS symptoms subscore and ADL subscore (p < 0.05).ConclusionsPatients in the early postoperative period after TKA exhibited worse gait performance as assessed by inertial sensors compared with healthy controls. Gait symmetry was correlated with PROMs. These results indicate the usefulness of assessing gait parameters after TKA.     

The association between radiographic severity and pre-operative function in patients undergoing primary knee replacement for osteoarthritis

ObjectiveTo determine the association between radiographic osteoarthritis (OA) and pre-operative function in patients undergoing primary knee replacement.MethodsSingle centre study examining pre-operative outcomes in a consecutive series of 525 patients who underwent primary knee replacement for OA between January 2006 and December 2007. Pre-operative data included: demographics, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) status and OA in the contralateral knee. The International Knee Society (IKS) rating and Short Form-12 (SF-12) were recorded for each patient. Pre-operative radiographs were read by a single observer for Kellgren and Lawrence (K&L) grading and Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) atlas features. Multiple linear regression was used to assess the strength of associations between radiographic OA severity and function, adjusting for clinically relevant variables.ResultsLateral tibiofemoral osteophyte grade was an independent predictor of pre-operative function as determined by the functional sub-scale of the IKS in patients undergoing primary knee replacement (coefficient = 2.58, p = 0.033). No associations were evident between pre-operative function and modified K&L, joint space narrowing, Ahlbäck attrition and coronal plane deformity. Other statistically significant predictors of poorer pre-operative function included: advancing age, female gender, knee pain and poorer SF-12 mental component summary scores which including osteophyte grade accounted for 24.6% of the variation in functional scores, (r = 0.496).ConclusionOsteophytes in the lateral compartment of the knee were associated with pre-operative function in patients with advanced knee OA. Further studies are required which examine individual radiographic features specifically in patients with advanced knee OA to determine their relationship to pre-operative pain and function.     

Comparison of the clinical and patient-reported outcomes between medial stabilized and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) is effective in relieving pain and improving function in patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis. Both medial stabilized total knee arthroplasty (MS-TKA) and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty (PS-TKA) can achieve satisfactory clinical results, but comparisons between MS-TKA and PS-TKA have yielded contradictory conclusions. This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to investigate the differences in clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) between MS-TKA and PS-TKA.MethodsIn December 2020, systematic searches of the following databases were undertaken: Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinical Trials.gov. Studies with PROMs comparing MS-TKA to PS-TKA were included. Meta-analysis was conducted for range of motion (ROM), Knee Society Score (KSS), Knee Society Functional Score (KFS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Oxford Knee Score (OKS).ResultsThere were 17 studies included in this review, 13 studies used for quantitative analysis, and 4 studies used for qualitative synthesis. Meta-analysis concluded that the WOMAC mean difference (MD) for MS-TKA was 1.55 higher than for PS-TKA (MD = −1.55; 95 %CI = −2.45 to −0.64, P = 0.0008); however, this difference was less than the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) value of 15. Assessment using the OKS determined that the MD for PS-TKA was 0.58 higher than for MS-TKA (MD = 0.58; 95 %CI = 0.25 to 0.91, P = 0.0006); again, this MD was less than the MCID value of 5. There were no significant differences between MS-TKA and PS-TKA when assessed by ROM (P = 0.23), KSS (P = 0.13), KFS (P = 0.61), or FJS (P = 0.22).ConclusionDerived from numerous sources, utilizing a multitude of validated functional and patient-reported outcome assessment tools, there was no clinically evident advantage of MS-TKA compared to PS-TKA.RegistrationThe registration number on PROSPERO is CRD42021228555.     

Serum and synovial fluid concentrations of interleukin-18 and interleukin-20 in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and their correlation with other markers of inflammation and turnover of joint cartilage

IntroductionOsteoarthritis (OA) is the most common degenerative joint disease, and its aetiology is not entirely known. The aim of the study was to evaluate the involvement of interleukin-18 (IL-18) and interleukin-20 (IL-20) in the pathogenesis of knee OA and their correlations with other markers of inflammation and destruction of joint cartilage, as well as clinical and radiological changes.Material and methodsThe study included 25 patients with knee OA and a control group. The concentration of IL-18, IL-20, IL-6, MMP-1, MMP-3, COMP, PG-AG, and YKL-40 in serum and synovial fluid (SF) were determined. We also evaluated radiological lesions of the knee joint according to the Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) scale, and clinical severity of the disease according to Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Lequesne Index.ResultsThe concentrations of IL-18 and IL-20 were statistically significantly higher in serum of patients with OA than in the control group (106.00 ±189.76 pg/ml vs. 16.73 ±16.99 pg/ml, p < 0.001, 17.69 ±13.45 pg/ml vs. 9.76 ±9.00 pg/ml, p < 0.014). Serum concentration of IL-18 positively correlated with MMP-3 (R = 0.58; p = 0.006) and YKL-40 (R = 0.48; p = 0.002). The degree of radiological advancement of OA (K-L scale) correlated positively with clinical evaluation (WOMAC, R = 0.74, p ≤ 0.001; Lequesne Index, R = 0.57, p = 0.003).ConclusionsThe analysis of ROC curves showed that IL-20 as well as COMP, MMP-3, and YKL-40 may be diagnostic markers of knee OA. The observations indicate that IL-18 potentially mediates mainly in intra-articular processes and IL-20 could be primarily responsible for the systemic inflammatory reaction.