The effect of GJB2 allele variants on performance after cochlear implantation

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: It has been hypothesized that etiology of hearing loss may serve as an independent variable in performance after cochlear implantation. To test this hypothesis, the authors identified pediatric cochlear implant recipients with gap junction protein beta2 (GJB2)-related deafness. The study examines performance outcomes associated with GJB2 deafness-causing allele variants. STUDY DESIGN: Pediatric cochlear implant patients were screened for GJB2 allele variants; statistical comparisons were made with prospectively obtained performance measures. METHODS: From 181 children who participated in a nationwide cochlear implant research program, 122 children were identified with congenital nonsyndromic sensorineural hearing loss and invited to participate. Screening for GJB2 allele variants was completed for 55 children. The children were homogeneous with respect to age (8 or 9 y) and age at implant (before age 5 y). All patients have previously undergone a prospective regimented battery of performance measures. RESULTS: Performance measures were compared between 22 children with and 33 children without mutations to determine whether GJB2 status was a significant predictor of cochlear implant outcomes. Reading and cognitive outcomes were significantly dependent on connexin status. The group of children who tested positive for GJB2-related deafness scored significantly higher on a nonverbal cognitive measure, Block Design, and on a measure of reading comprehension. CONCLUSION: The isolated insult to the cochlea created by GJB2 allele variants allows for preservation of central cognitive function. Better reading performance is seen in children with GJB2-related deafness.     

Cochlear implants in Waardenburg syndrome

OBJECTIVE: Waardenburg syndrome is an autosomal-dominant syndrome characterized by dystopia canthorum, hyperplasia of the eyebrows, heterochromia irides, a white forelock, and sensorineural hearing loss in 20% to 55% of patients. This patient population accounts for approximately 2% of congenitally deaf children. The purpose of this retrospective case review was to describe the outcomes for those children with Waardenburg syndrome who have undergone cochlear implantation. METHODS: Pediatric cochlear implant recipients with documented evidence of Waardenburg syndrome underwent retrospective case review. All patients received their cochlear implants at the study institution followed by outpatient auditory habilitation. Charts were reviewed for etiology and duration of deafness, age at time of cochlear implantation, perioperative complications, duration of use, and performance outcomes. Results of standard tests batteries for speech perception and production administered as a part of the patients' auditory habilitation were reviewed. RESULTS: Seven patients with Waardenburg syndrome and cochlear implants were identified. The average age at implantation was 37 months (range, 18-64 months) and the average duration of use was 69 months (range, 12-143 months). All of these patients are active users of their devices and perform very well after implantation. There were no major complications in this small group of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Children with congenital sensorineural hearing loss without other comorbidities (e.g., developmental delay, inner ear malformations) perform well when they receive cochlear implantation and auditory habilitation. Patients with Waardenburg syndrome can be expected to have above-average performance after cochlear implantation.     

Better speech performance in cochlear implant patients with GJB2-related deafness.

OBJECTIVE: We applied mutation screening in seven cochlear implant users to identify those persons with GJB2-related deafness to determine whether etiology of deafness was predictive of speech performance after implantation. METHODS: Direct sequence of GJB2 was conducted over seven cochlear implant users with prelingual hearing impairment and their speech, language and cognitive performance was examined. RESULTS: The three persons with GJB2-related deafness had a mean vocabulary of 1243 words compared to a mean vocabulary of 195 words in the four children with GJB2-unrelated deafness, although the number of patients examined here was limited. The developmental quotient (DQ) of cognitive ability also was higher in those children with GJB2-related deafness. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results suggest that better speech performance after cochlear implantation may be observed in persons with GJB2-related deafness. In the future, detailed phenotypic studies and mutation screening for non-syndromic hearing loss may play an important role in the preoperative assessment of prelingually-deafened children.     

Auditory responses in cochlear implant users with and without GJB2 deafness

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: It is reasonable to suppose that the pattern of sensorineural damage along the length of the cochlea depends on the etiology of a hearing loss (HL). In GJB2-related deafness, we hypothesize that gap junction deficits are uniformly distributed and will result in similar damage along the length of the cochlea as compared with non-GJB2 subjects. We assessed this by measuring patterns of neural activity and hearing from apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode regions. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective, blind, controlled study. METHODS: Blood from 301 pediatric cochlear implant users was analyzed for mutations in GJB2 by direct sequencing. After exclusion of patients with monoallelic GJB2 mutations, associated syndromes, or risk factors for HL that were not congenital, 39 children with biallelic GJB2 mutations and 58 without GJB2 mutations were evaluated. Hearing was measured before implantation at frequencies ranging from 250 Hz to 8 kHz. After implantation, neural activity at the apical and basal ends of the implanted array was measured using electrically evoked compound action potentials of the auditory nerve (ECAPs) and evoked stapedius reflexes (ESRs). RESULTS: GJB2 and non-GJB2 groups were not significantly different with respect to sex, age at implantation, duration of auditory deprivation, hearing aid use, duration of aided hearing, ear implanted, implant model, or depth of insertion (P>.05). Children with GJB2-related HL had greater similarities between low- and high-frequency residual hearing and between neural activity electrically evoked at apical and basal regions of the cochlea as compared with children with non-GJB2-related HL who demonstrated larger deficits in basal regions. CONCLUSION: Results suggest more consistent spiral ganglion survival along the length of the cochlea in GJB2-related HL as compared with non-GJB2-related HL, which appears to involve a decreasing gradient of spiral ganglion survival from the apex to the base of the cochlea. Our findings support our premise that in GJB2-related HL, dysfunction of gap junctions likely occurs to a similar degree in the apical and basal regions of the cochlea. This knowledge might be used to customize implantable devices for patients with HL in the future.     

GJB2基因突变致聋患儿人工耳蜗植入效果分析

目的 比较GJB2基因突变致聋患儿与非GJB2基因突变且内耳结构正常聋儿人工耳蜗植入术后的听觉言语康复效果.方法 对37例经C下及MRI检查排除内耳畸形的聋儿术前行GJB2基因检查,根据结果 分成A组(GJB2基因突变10例)和B组(非GJB2基因突变27例),术后随访0.5～2年,进行术后的听阈、言语识别率及言语能力评估.结果 37例聋儿人工耳蜗植入手术全部成功,均建立了主观听性反应.A组的声场听阈水平平均为34.41±6.12 dB HL.言语识别率平均为76%; B组的声场听阈水平平均为36.23±4.16 dB HL.言语识别率平均为79%,两组均达到平均言语康复级别二级;两组听觉及言语能力测试结果 均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 人工耳蜗患者中GJB2基因突变率高,可能是内耳结构正常的人工耳蜗植入人群耳聋的主要致聋原因;GJB2基因突变致聋患儿与非GJB2基因突变且内耳结构正常聋儿人工耳蜗植入术后效果基本一致.人工耳蜗植入可作为GJB2基因突变致聋患儿的有效治疗手段.     

Auditory perception and speech discrimination after cochlear implantation in patients with connexin 26 (GJB2) gene-related deafness.

HYPOTHESIS: Auditory perception and speech discrimination among pediatric cochlear implantees may vary because of underlying deafness etiology, including connexin 26 (GJB2) gene-related deafness. BACKGROUND: Preliminary data suggest pathologic changes due to GJB2 mutations do not affect the spiral ganglion cells, which are stimulated by the cochlear implant. The survival of the spiral ganglion cells is believed to be an important determinant of outcome after surgery. Patients with GJB2-related deafness may therefore have enhanced prospects for good speech discrimination after implantation. METHODS: In an observational cohort study, GJB2 mutation analysis was performed using polymerase chain reaction amplification and direct sequencing on 31 prelingually deaf pediatric cochlear implantees, of which there were 30 with nonsyndromic deafness of unknown etiology, and one with keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome. Speech discrmination was assessed prospectively when they had reached postoperative year 3 using the IOWA Matrix Level B Sentences test and Glendonald Auditory Screening Procedure (GASP), with both patients and assessors blind to GJB2 status. RESULTS: Eleven patients had GJB2-related deafness and 20 patients had GJB2-unrelated deafness. IOWA Matrix scores were higher in patients with GJB2-related deafness but did not reach statistical significance. However, GASP scores were statistically significantly higher in patients with GJB2-related deafness (median word score, 92%; median sentence score, 80%), compared with those of patients with GJB2-unrelated deafness (median word score, 63%; median sentence score, 45%; word score, p = 0.037; sentence score, p = 0.045). Ordinal logistic regression analysis on IOWA Matrix and GASP sentence scores found better statistically significant scores in patients with GJB2-related deafness (p < 0.05) after adjustment for confounding variables. CONCLUSION: Pediatric cochlear implantees with GJB2-related deafness appear to have equal or better speech discrimination compared with a group of prelingually deaf children with deafness of unknown etiology.     

Connexin-associated deafness and speech perception outcome of cochlear implantation

OBJECTIVE: To compare performance after cochlear implantation in children with mutations in connexin (Cx) 26 (GJB2) or Cx30 (GJB6) and children with deafness of unknown etiology. DESIGN: Genetic analysis and speech perception evaluation was performed in the children with and without Cx mutations who had undergone cochlear implantation. Speech perception performance was retrospectively analyzed 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months after implantation. Test material was selected according to the child's age and cognitive and language abilities. SETTING: The study took place at speech and hearing and genetic centers of a hospital in the central part of Israel and the genetics departments of 3 additional centrally located hospitals. PATIENTS: A total of 30 children who had undergone cochlear implantation were selected for the study, with control patients matched according to age at implantation, duration of implant use, and mode of communication. There was no evidence for additional disabilities or handicaps in either group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech perception measurements included a questionnaire, as well as closed and open-set tests. RESULTS: Overall, the 2 groups showed significant improvement in speech perception results after implantation. Four years after implantation, both groups achieved mean open-set speech perception scores of approximately 60%, 75%, and 90% for monosyllabic, 2 syllables, and words in sentences tests, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There were no apparent differences in speech perception performance after implantation between the children with Cx mutations and children with deafness of unknown etiology. These data have important implications as a prognostic indicator when counseling candidates for cochlear implantation.     

GJB2 gene mutations in cochlear implant recipients: prevalence and impact on outcome

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of GJB2 gene mutations in patients undergoing cochlear implantation (CI) and their impact on rehabilitative outcome following implantation. DESIGN: Prospective determination of GJB2 mutation by sequence analysis by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography and its correlation with outcome following CI. SETTINGS: Two tertiary academic medical centers. PATIENTS: Subjects who have met the audiologic criteria and have undergone CI. RESULTS: Of 77 cochlear implant recipients screened, 13 (18%) harbored a detectable sequence alteration in the GJB2 gene. Only 3 of these 13 patients had hearing loss clearly attributable to a biallelic GJB2 mutation. There were 2 patients with homozygous mutations, including a 35delG and a 167delT mutation, and a third with a compound heterozygous mutation. Of the remaining 10 patients, 8 had 1 deafness allele, while 2 had a normal polymorphism that was not believed to be implicated in the hearing loss. Six patients had the common 35delG mutation: 5 patients had heterozygous mutations, which are probably not related to the underlying hearing loss (a second deafness allele cannot be ruled out in these cases because of the screening methodology used), while 1 patient had a homozygous mutation, which was clearly implicated in the patient's deafness. Rehabilitative outcome among those with detectable sequence alterations, as well as the 3 patients with biallelic mutations, varied but were similar on average when compared with outcomes seen in our entire CI population. CONCLUSIONS: A large percentage of implant candidates harbor mutations or sequence alterations in the GJB2 gene, although only a small number of these changes are biallelic and a clear cause of the hearing loss. These results demonstrate that patients with GJB2-related deafness clearly benefit from CI.     

Successful cochlear implantation in prelingual profound deafness resulting from the common 233delC mutation of the GJB2 gene in the Japanese

OBJECTIVES: Recently, we identified three novel mutations of the GJB2 gene in Japanese families with autosomal-recessive non-syndromic deafness.1 Seven of 11 mutated chromosomes (63.6%) contained a 233delC allele, suggesting that the 233delC mutation is the most common mutation of the GJB2 gene in the Japanese population. After it was recognized that cochlear implantation (CI) is of benefit to children with prelingual deafness, we have had a number of prelingual pediatric CI patients. Because children carrying the homozygous 233delC mutation show bilateral prelingual profound deafness, they could be enrolled in the CI program at Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine. The purposes of this study were 1) to analyze the occurrence of the GJB2 mutations in our 15 prelingual pediatric CI patients in whom the cause of non-syndromic deafness was unknown, and 2) to evaluate the auditory function and postoperative speech perception with CI of those GJB2-related deaf subjects. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. METHODS: Mutation analysis of the GJB2 gene by direct sequencing was performed with genomic DNA from 15 children born profoundly deaf as a result of unknown causes and implanted with CI. Intraoperative electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) and intra-/postoperative EAP were measured. The speech perception was evaluated with Infants and Toddlers Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (IT-MAIS). RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We identified 4 CI patients (26.7%) out of 15 children carrying the homozygous 233delC mutation. Intra- and postoperative evaluation of the auditory system revealed almost intact cochlear and retrocochlear auditory function in these 4 patients. Postoperative auditory testing indicates that their speech perception had become significantly higher in comparison with that of other prelingual CI patients. These results suggest that prelingual deaf children carrying the homozygous 233delC mutation of the GJB2 gene can benefit from CI.     

Connexin 26 (GJB2) gene-related deafness and speech intelligibility after cochlear implantation.

HYPOTHESIS: Speech intelligibility in children after cochlear implantation may depend on their deafness cause, including connexin 26 (GJB2) gene-related deafness. BACKGROUND: There is significant variability in the degree of intelligibility, or clarity, of children's speech after cochlear implantation. GJB2 gene-related deafness may be a factor, as preliminary data suggest that pathologic changes do not affect the spiral ganglion cells, which are the neural elements stimulated by the implant, thus favoring better results. METHODS: In an observational retrospective cohort study of pediatric cochlear implantees, 38 patients with nonsyndromic deafness of unknown cause and 1 with keratitisichthyosis-deafness syndrome underwent GJB2 mutation analysis using polymerase chain reaction amplification and direct sequencing. The primary outcome measure assessed was Speech Intelligibility Rating score from postoperative Year 1 (n = 39) to Year 5 (n = 17). Educational setting was considered as a secondary outcome measure. Statistical analysis was double-blinded, with patients and assessors of outcome unaware of GJB2 status. RESULTS: Fourteen patients had GJB2-related deafness and 25 had GJB2-unrelated deafness. Comparisons at Year 3 (n = 31) revealed intelligible speech achieved by 9 of 11 with GJB2-related deafness, compared with only 6 of 20 with GJB2-unrelated deafness (p = 0.017). Ordinal logistic regression analysis on Speech Intelligibility Rating scores found statistically significantly better scores in children with GJB2-related deafness (p < 0.05) both before and after adjustment for confounding variables. A larger proportion with GJB2-related deafness also attended mainstream school (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: In pediatric cochlear implantees, GJB2-related deafness is a predictor of good speech intelligibility.     

Clinical course of hearing and language development in GJB2 and non-GJB2 deafness following habilitation with hearing aids

Mutations in the GJB2 gene (connexin 26) are the most common cause of nonsyndromic autosomal recessive sensorineural hearing loss. Genetic testing of GJB2 may offer opportunities to predict the features of hearing loss and prognostication of speech-language development in children with hearing loss. The present study assessed the clinical features of hearing and some aspects of language development in congenital deafness due either to GJB2 mutations or to other factors in Japanese patients who had been habilitated with hearing aids. Thirty-five unrelated subjects with nonsyndromic, congenital, bilateral sensorineural hearing loss were enrolled in the study. Among them, 16 had biallelic GJB2 mutations related to hearing loss and 17 lacked such mutations. As has been reported in populations of European ancestry, the present Japanese subjects with GJB2 mutations had a relatively high incidence of the flat pattern audiogram and nonprogressive pure tone thresholds compared with subjects without GJB2 mutations. Subjects with GJB2 mutations and those without GJB2 mutations both showed a similar tendency in speech perception, some aspects of language development, and communication methods. In both groups, development of reading ability tended to be normal, but vocabulary development tended to be delayed. The present results establish the basis for future studies to aid in the evaluation and follow-up of patients with congenital hearing loss associated with GJB2 mutations who are habilitated with hearing aids.     

Successful cochlear implantation in a patient with bilateral progressive sensorineural hearing loss after traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage and brain contusion

OBJECTIVES: We address the proper indications for cochlear implantation for profound deafness with possible retrocochlear involvement by reporting successful implantation in a patient with traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage and brain contusion. METHODS: We present a patient (55-year-old man) who had bilateral progressive sensorineural hearing loss after traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage and brain contusion. Preoperative imaging and functional studies were done, as well as routine tests, to evaluate the possible performance of the cochlear implant. RESULTS: Sensorineural hearing loss developed promptly after head trauma with progressive deterioration. The cause of progressive sensorineural hearing loss remained unknown. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions demonstrated bilateral inner ear (outer hair cell) damage. Highly impaired speech discrimination despite less marked pure tone average elevation and a focal lesion in the left middle temporal gyrus suggested the possibility of coexisting retrocochlear lesions. After thorough discussion of the possible outcomes, cochlear implantation was successfully performed 25 months after the trauma. The patient became able to use a telephone. CONCLUSIONS: We advocate that profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss caused by traumatic head injury, even with possible involvement of central auditory pathways, should not be regarded as a contraindication to cochlear implantation, as long as bilateral inner ear dysfunction is clearly demonstrated and there is no obvious evidence of central deafness.     

Sensorineural hearing loss in children

Sensorineural hearing loss in children, either congenital or acquired, has an incidence of 2-4 per million. Molecular diagnosis of early childhood deafness became available for some types of syndromal and non-syndromal forms and will offer different treatment modalities in the future. Severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss can be effectively treated with cochlear implants. There is evidence of cerebral auditory plasticity under electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve with better performance in early implanted children. Other predicting factors are related to the type of schooling, family support and residual hearing. In the long-term, prelingually deafened children will develop considerable speech perception and production. Children with marginal benefit from hearing aid amplification show significant improvements in speech perception following implantation. Implantation is also possible in cases of cochlear malformation. However, special attention has to be given to the facial nerve, a possible CSF leak and electrode misplacement. Apart from hearing improvement cochlear implants have a positive impact on the family situation, schooling and personal well-being.     

The effect of GJB2 and SLC26A4 gene mutations on rehabilitative outcomes in pediatric cochlear implant patients

To analyze the treatment outcomes in pediatric cochlear implant patients with mutations in GJB2 or SLC26A4 and to determine these mutations’ impact on rehabilitative outcomes. The study included 41 children who received unilateral cochlear implantations. Fifteen of these children had GJB2-related deafness, 10 had SLC26A4-related deafness, and 16 had deafness of unknown etiology. Speech perception and language development evaluations, including the Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS), categories of auditory performance (CAP), speech intelligibility rating (SIR) and babbling spurt, were conducted before and after the implantation. Better results for the GJB2 group (vs. the control group) were observed regarding MAIS, CAP and SIR at 24 months after implantation (P < 0.05). The performance of GJB2 group was better than SLC26A4 group, expressed by a significant difference in the variance of CAP and SIR at 24 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). A trend towards earlier babbling spurt onset could be observed for the GJB2 group, intergroup comparison did not reveal any significant difference among the three groups (P > 0.05). The SLC26A4 group performed better than the control group at 12 and 24 months postoperatively, although without a statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). The GJB2 gene mutations had a significantly positive impact on the outcome of cochlear implantation. Patients with SLC26A4-related deafness were shown to benefit from cochlear implantation.     

Late postnatal onset of hearing loss due to GJB2 mutations

GJB2 mutations account for approximately 50% of recessive non-syndromic deafness, with 35delG being the most prevalent. Homozygous 35delG mutations cause pre-lingual, non-progressive hearing loss that is detected on newborn hearing screening programmes. We present a sibling pair with homozygous 35delG mutations, who passed hearing tests in early infancy and developed progressive sensorineural hearing loss, one requiring a cochlear implant. These cases illustrate that deafness due to such mutations may have a late onset and consequently be missed on neonatal screening programmes and they may present an argument to consider neonatal screening for GJB2 mutations in order to aid early intervention.     

A novel frameshift mutation (c.405delC) in the GJB2 gene associated with autosomal recessive hearing loss in two Tunisian families

Objectives

Mutations in GJB2 are found to be responsible for 50% of congenital autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing loss, one of the most important mutations in this gene is the c.35delG, which is responsible for the majority of GJB2 related deafness in the Tunisian population. The aim of this study was to determine the molecular etiology of hearing loss in two Tunisian individuals.

Methods

We screened two Tunisian individuals affected by congenital, bilateral, profound, sensorineural hearing loss for mutations in GJB2 gene using PCR and direct sequencing.

Results

We identified a novel frameshift mutation in the GJB2 gene, the c.405delC resulting in a truncated protein (p.Tyr136Thrfs*32). It was found in compound heterozygosity with the c.35delG in two non-consanguineous unrelated families from Tunisia. One patient underwent a cochlear implant at 4 years. Initial evaluations post-implantation indicate a successful cochlear implant outcome since the patient began to acquire language abilities and auditory sensation.

Conclusions

With this novel GJB2 mutation, the mutational spectrum of this gene continues to broaden in our population. The occurrence of biallelic GJB2 mutations for the other deaf girl, despite the neonatal pain and hypotension due to complicated delivery, led us to confirm the importance of GJB2 screening for cochlear implant candidates regardless of the etiology of deafness in populations with a relatively high frequency of GJB2 mutation carriers.     

GJB2 mutations and additional disabilities in a pediatric cochlear implant population

BACKGROUND: Children with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss due to GJB2 mutations have often been deemed good cochlear implant candidates. Studies on children with GJB2 mutations and cochlear implants have typically excluded children with additional disabilities. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the presence of additional disabilities among children with and without GJB2 mutations in a cochlear implant population. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of children with non-syndromic sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) who received a cochlear implant between 1993 and 2004. RESULTS: Among 108 children within the cochlear implant database; 46 patients met the inclusion criteria of idiopathic non-syndromic hearing loss. Sixteen children had GJB2 mutations, 12 were GJB2 negative, and 17 did not receive GJB2 testing but had no other identifiable etiology or risk factor contributing to hearing loss. The proportion of children with additional disabilities that would affect either pre-operative assessments or post-operative results in the GJB2 positive group was 44% compared to 33% of children in the GJB2 negative. Additional disabilities were present in 41% of the children who did not receive GJB2 testing. The disabilities in the GJB2 positive group included specific learning disability, apraxia, epileptiform aphasia, attention deficit disorder, global developmental delay, and gross motor delay. The GJB2 negative and those children not receiving GJB2 testing had motor delays, language delay, autism, specific learning disability, and attention deficit disorder. The proportion of children with at least 6 months CI use who relied on oral communication was 62% in the GJB2 positive group, 66% in the GJB2 negative group, and 38% in the untested group. A majority of the genetic alleles were 35delG (81%) and 10 of 16 (63%) patients with GJB2 mutations were homozygous 35delG. The rate of developmental diagnoses was similar in patients with homozygous GJB2 compared to compound heterozygous genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of biallelic GJB2 mutations does not rule out non-hearing related disorders that can have an effect on speech, language and learning. Forty-four percent of children with GJB2 mutations had other conditions that could directly affect pre-implant evaluation and post-implant performance. This rate is similar to the reported prevalence among the overall population of children with hearing loss. All children should have a comprehensive evaluation of development and behavior regardless of the etiology of hearing loss.     

Assessment of outcomes of hearing and speech rehabilitation in children with cochlear implantation

ObjectivesThis study aimed to assess the effect of hearing and speech rehabilitation in patients with Nurotron^® cochlear implants.DesignNinety-eight paediatric patients with bilateral severe-to-profound sensorineural deafness who received cochlear implantation were divided into three groups according to age: group A (≤3 years), group B (4–7 years), and group C (8–16 years). All patients were followed up for one year for hearing and speech performance after the surgery. The comprehensive Auditory Perception Assessment, MAIS, CAP and SIR hearing and speech assessments and rating materials were used for assessment before the surgery and at 3, 6, and 12 months after implant activation.ResultsThe scores of patients in the open-set speech assessment, Chinese Auditory Perception Assessment, MAIS, CAP and SIR significantly improved after cochlear implantation in all age groups. The younger the age at implantation, the better the results. Moreover, the hearing and speech performance of cochlear implant recipients gradually improved with the extension of rehabilitation time.ConclusionsNurotron^® Venus? cochlear implantation can improve the hearing and speech performance of patients with bilateral severe-to-profound sensorineural deafness.     

Speech perception in children with auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony managed with either hearing AIDS or cochlear implants

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate speech perception skills in children with auditory neuropathy (AN)/auditory dyssynchrony (AD)-type hearing loss managed with either hearing aids or cochlear implants. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective data collection in 3 subject groups: AN/AD children fitted with bilateral amplification, AN/AD children fitted with cochlear implant (in 1 or both ears), and a matched control group of implanted children with sensorineural hearing loss. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Open-set monosyllabic words (consonant-nucleus-consonant). RESULTS: Of the 10 implanted AN/AD children, 9 demonstrated significant speech discrimination (consonant-nucleus-consonant phoneme score > or =55%). Similar results were obtained for the aided AN/AD group. Findings for both AN/AD subject groups were poorer than those of the implanted sensorineural cohort. CONCLUSION: Cochlear implantation can offer useful hearing in subjects with AN/AD-type hearing loss. However, expectations for this group may need to be lower than for patients with peripheral (cochlear) loss.     

Predictive models for cochlear implantation in elderly candidates

OBJECTIVE: An aging American population carries a high prevalence of profound sensorineural hearing loss. We examined the performance of multichannel cochlear implant recipients in a large database of adult subjects. DESIGN: Nonconcurrent prospective study of a national cohort with multivariate regression analysis of preoperative and postoperative performance variables in multichannel cochlear implant recipients. We applied models of prediction established in previous studies to the observed results. SETTING: Referral centers with active cochlear implant programs. PATIENTS: Adolescents and adults with profound hearing loss (N = 749; age range, 14-91 years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Postoperative monosyllabic word recognition. RESULTS: The population 65 years and older demonstrated a clinically insignificant 4.6%-smaller postoperative word score compared with the population younger than 65 years. When duration of deafness exceeded 25 years, elderly recipients demonstrated higher word scores than their younger counterparts. A more significant factor affecting outcomes is the ratio of duration of deafness to age at implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Age at implantation carried relatively little predictive value for postoperative performance in subjects 65 years and older. Although a small decrement in mean speech recognition scores was evident, the clinical significance of this difference is questionable when all of the results observed in elderly patients are considered. A shorter percentage of life spent in severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss suggests a foundation of acoustic/auditory processing in the elderly cohort that may mitigate potential physiological effects associated with advanced age. This study confirms and extends previous observations that duration of profound deafness and residual speech recognition carry higher predictive value than the age at which an individual receives an implant.