Accuracy of HPV testing of vaginal smear obtained with a novel self-sampling device

BACKGROUND: Most of women diagnosed as having cervical cancer have not participated in organized cytological screening. Aim. A study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of human papilloma virus testing by self-collected vaginal samples in comparison to regular cytological screening. The agreement of hybrid capture 2 assay and polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of human papilloma virus DNA in self-collected vaginal samples and clinician-obtained cervical smears was investigated. METHOD: Forty-three women aged 23-58 years admitted for further examination due to previous positive cytology in the organized screening participated in self-collecting of vaginal samples with a novel self-sampling device. During the visit a clinician also collected a cervical smear using a cytobrush. The vaginal samples collected with the self-sampling device were analyzed for high-risk human papilloma virus with the hybrid capture 2 assay technique and the cervical smears were Pap-stained, examined cytologically and after that reanalyzed for human papilloma virus DNA using a polymerase chain reaction assay. RESULT: The vaginal samples were positive for high-risk human papilloma virus in 37% of the cases using hybrid capture 2 assay. Twelve of the 43 Pap smears showed positive cytology (ASCUS-CIN 3), of which 4 showed CIN 2-3. When polymerase chain reaction assay was performed, human papilloma virus DNA was detected in 40% of the glass slides. The agreement between cytology and the two human papilloma virus testing techniques was 67-74% (kappa 0.27-0.45) and the agreement between the two human papilloma virus tests was 70% (kappa 0.36). CONCLUSION: Testing for high-risk human papilloma virus can identify more women at risk of developing cervical cancer than cytology irrespective of the sampling method. Furthermore, offering a self-sampling device for collection of vaginal smear seems to be a useful screening tool for cervical cancer among women not responding to an invitation for smear sampling.     

Integrating HPV testing for primary screening?

Cervical cancer, the second most common cancer in young women in France, is still today imperfectly screened even with the advent of primary prevention for this cancer in the form of prophylactic HPV vaccination. Indeed, the cervical Pap smear and its cytologic analysis, both operator and reader dependent, have limited sensitivities requiring repeated samplings and above all, producing a high rate of falsely negative tests. Although most cancers occur in women who are either not or insufficiently screened, the problem with cervical smears is the fact that cancers are also often diagnosed in young women having follow-ups in accordance with professional guidelines. The absence of an organized screening in France results in an inadequate female population coverage. Nowadays, it is unanimously recognized that high-risk papillomaviruses (HR HPV) represent the only independent risk factor for cervical cancer and that there cannot be any disease without this virus. It is therefore this strong association between a viral agent and the cervical cancer which opened the door firstly, to the notion of prophylactic vaccination and secondly, to the integration of HR HPV testing in the screening for precancerous lesions. Molecular biological techniques based on the HR HPV genome detection within the female genital tract have shown a very high sensitivity without any inter and intraobserver variability and an excellent negative predictive value. Their integration in the primary screening for cervical cancer would improve the relevance of the latter and would suit the need for a wider population coverage and even for an organized screening thanks to the possibility for self-sampling. The specificity of these tests is inferior to that of the cervical smear, but the management of the falsely positive HPV tests has proved to be efficient by sorting residual cells obtained from liquid-based cytology. What is urgent in France is the need for an organized screening programme in order to improve population coverage and, this does not go against neither a vaccination promotion nor the integration of new technologies. Moreover, the last three randomized trials published in October 2007 have shown that it was quite safely possible to extend the time interval between two consecutive viral testing and thus improving the cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening. The aim of this work was to analyze publications on the subject in order to conclude, according to proof levels obtained by different studies, on its usefulness in the secondary prevention of cervical cancer.     

HPV-Selbstuntersuchung

In Germany, less then 50% of the female population attends cervical cancer screening. Self-assessment for HPV offers more women the chance to participate in screening. The published studies have employed various collection devices. The use of tampons and vaginal lavage yielded an acceptable sensitivity for the detection of CIN and cervical cancer, however, has limited practicability. Vaginal self-sampling using a dacron-swab shows a high acceptance rate but heterogeneous results in the detection rate of cervical neoplasia. Vaginal self-sampling with a smooth and thin brush achieved the best results in acceptance rate and sensitivity. The sensitivity of HPV self-assessment is equal or better when compared to cytology, however, the false-positive rate is higher. For follow up of HPV positive women, colposcopic assessment is mandatory. Cytological controls are not sufficient. HPV self-assessment in non-gynaecological offices or even at home has the potential to increase the participation rate in countries with opportunistic screening of cervical cancer. However, current study data are limited. Therefore, implementation of HPV self-assessment cannot be recommended at the moment.     

贵州省三都水族自取样HPV检测宫颈癌筛查及分流模式#br#

Objective?To explore a cervical cancer screening strategy suitable for remote minority areas in China. Methods?A total of 1 874 cases of shui minority women aged 21~65 years in Sandu were randomly sampled self-sampling HPV test, TCT test and P16 cytological immunohistochemical test. The patients with HPV positive, TCT abnormality (ASC-US) and P16+underwent colposcopy and biopsy, and squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) was detected. Results?The positive rate of HR-HPV was 15.69% in 1 874 women. HPV52 was the most common type, followed by HPV16, HPV39, HPV58 and HPV56. Among 249 patients with colposcopy biopsy, 23 cases (9.24%) were detected with HSIL or above lesions.The positive rates of p16 in HSIL and above cervical lesions, LSIL and cervicitis were 73.91%, 34.57% and 10.34% (P<0.001).The sensitivity of self-sampled HPV test to HSIL+ was 100%, and the area under ROC curve for HSIL+ detected by HPV-positive test and p16 test was 0.577 (P>0.05) and 0.774 (P<0.05), respectively. Conclusion?Self-sampled HPV was highly sensitive to HSIL. Using self-sampling HPV detection as primary screening, combined with p16 staining triage, can be used as a screening strategy in remote areas of Guizhou province to improve the coverage of screening.     

Interest of Human Papillomavirus DNA quantification and genotyping in paired cervical and urine samples to detect cervical lesions

Background

Cervical cancer is caused by persistent infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV). Conventional human papillomavirus (HPV) testing requires cervical sampling. However, vaginal and urine self-sampling methods are more acceptable for patients and result in increased participation when they are available in screening programs. In this context, we have developed a non-invasive screening method via the detection of HPV DNA in urine samples.

Purpose

To compare HPV viral loads and genotypes in paired cervical and urine samples, and to assess correlation between virological and cytological results in women seeking gynecological consultation.

Methods

Paired urine and cervical specimens were collected and analyzed from 230 of 245 women participating in the previously described prospective PapU study. HPV DNA detection and quantification were performed using a real-time PCR method with short fragment PCR primers. Genotyping was carried out using the INNO-LiPA HPV genotyping assay.

Results

The prevalence of HPV in the 230 paired urine and cervical smear samples was 42 and 49 %, respectively. Overall agreement for HPV positivity and negativity between the paired samples was 90 % (κ = 0.80). High HPV viral load in both cervical and urine samples was associated with cytological abnormalities. HPV-positive women were mostly infected with HR-HPV types. The agreement between high- and low-risk HPV (LR-HPV) detection in both samples was 97 % (κ = 0.95 for HR-HPV and κ = 0.97 for LR-HPV).

Conclusions

High concordance rates for HPV-DNA quantification and high/low-risk HPV genotyping in paired urine/cervical samples suggest that urinary HPV DNA testing could be useful for cervical lesion screening.     

Significance of HPV tests on women with cervical smears showing ASCUS

BACKGROUND: The relationship between the human papillomavirus (HPV) tests and the cytological findings was evaluated. METHODS: Totally, 161 women participating in the organized cytological screening in the County of Uppsala and showing atypical squamous cells of uncertain significance (ASCUS) in their cervical smears were identified during 2002 and 2003. Those women were invited for a repeated examination about 3 months later. At that occasion, a smear sample was collected and used for cytological examination and a concomitant HPV test. Oncogenic HPV was identified by polymerase chain reaction and HPV deoxyribonucleoside acid (DNA) sequence analysis in 50 cases and by Hybrid Capture II in 111 cases. RESULTS: Women with an ASCUS diagnosis showed a normal cytology and a negative HPV test in 30% of the cases, abnormal cytology and a positive HPV test in 32% of the cases; in 26% of the women, the HPV test was positive, whereas cytology was normal; and in 11% of the women, the HPV test was negative, whereas cytology was abnormal (ASCUS or more). CONCLUSION: The results show that HPV tests identify a larger group of women at risk to develop cervical cancer in comparison with cytological examination. As the HPV tests have a higher sensitivity than the cytological screening, it is suggested that an HPV test in conjunction with a diagnosis of ASCUS can be employed to more efficiently select women, to whom further follow up is recommended.     

The detection of HPV DNA improves the recognition of cervical intraepithelial lesions

Reasons that influence the efficacy of cervical cancer screening are failure to screen all women at risk, as well as inherent technical limitations of the conventional cervical smear. HPV DNA testing is a supplementary, objective test less independent on sampling failure. The aim of this study was to compare results of HPV DNA screening to cytological smears (CS) and histological diagnosis. From January 1995 to January 1999, cytological smears, cells for HPV DNA analysis and cervical biopsies were obtained from 280 women included in this study. Statistical methods: Fisher's exact test (2x2 contingency tables, P<0.01), Pearson Chi-square, P< 0.05, Spearman's rank correlation R. Sixty patients (21.4%) tested positive for low-risk (LR-HPV), 227 (81.1%) positive for high-risk HPV (HR-HPV). The CS proved to be a strong predictor for the histological diagnosis, reaching a sensitivity of 93.4%, a specificity of 65.8% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 77.4%. By combining cytology and HPV DNA testing, the sensitivity could be considerably enhanced (99.0%), though at a price of loss in specificity (30.1%). HPV DNA testing, available as a commercially standardized product, leads to a significant rise in sensitivity when used as an additional diagnostic tool to cytological screening methods and thus contributes to reduce the incidence of cervical carcinomas.     

新一代杂交捕获技术在宫颈癌筛查中的应用

目的:了解新一代杂交捕获技术(DH2)在宫颈癌筛查与传统筛查方式的优势比较,探讨HPV16/18分型检测对DH2初筛阳性患者分流管理的临床意义。方法:2013年、2014年、2015年分别对浙江省慈溪市79847例、81702例、61072例妇女采用巴氏涂片的方法进行宫颈癌筛查,在2015年、2016年分别对浙江省慈溪市35657例、59634例妇女使用DH2检测14种高危型HPV的方法进行宫颈癌筛查。以病理诊断作为金标准,分析高危型HPV检测与巴氏涂片在LSIL以上病变的检出率情况。同时对DH2阳性患者进行HPV16/18检测,对照和比较HPV16/18分流策略的检出情况。结果:2013年、2014年、2015年采用巴氏涂片的方法对LSIL以上病变的检出率分别为0.048%、0.105%、0.134%;2015年、2016年使用DH2检测14种高危型HPV的方法对LSIL以上病变的检出率分别为0.415%、0.550%。2015年采用DH2检测14种高危型HPV初筛模式,LSIL以上病变在DH2阳性及在HPV16/18阳性中的占比分别为4.644%、15.370%;2016年采用DH2检测14种高危型HPV初筛及初筛阳性患者HPV16/18分流的模式,LSIL以上病变在DH2阳性及在HPV16/18阳性中的占比分别为6.365%、22.430%。结论:使用DH2检测14种高危型HPV的方法比传统巴氏涂片对LSIL以上病变的检出率更高,DH2可作为宫颈癌初筛的可行方法;DH2初筛及初筛阳性患者HPV16/18分流管理模式对宫颈癌高危人群进行风险分层管理,重点关注HPV16/18阳性人群,可以进一步提高宫颈癌筛查中的LSIL以上病变检出率。     

Human papillomavirus typing in HIV-positive women

OBJECTIVE: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the major cause of cervical carcinoma and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia worldwide. Certain HPV types have a strong association with and probably a causative role in the pathogenesis of premalignant cervical lesions. Epidemiologic studies in women infected by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have shown an increased incidence of squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs), which were predominantly high-grade. Six to 30 per cent of women diagnosed with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) on a Papanicolaou (Pap) smear harbor SIL in normal screening populations. This study was undertaken to determine the presence of low-and high-risk HPV types in women infected by HIV and to correlate the results to those of the Pap smear. STUDY DESIGN: HPV DNA typing (low- and high-risk) by Digene (Digene Corporation, Gathesburg, MD) hybrid capture methodology was performed on cervical swabs from 209 HIV-positive women. The results of HPV typing were correlated with those of the Pap smear in a retrospective analysis. RESULTS: One hundred and one women (48%) tested positive for HPV subtypes by DNA typing by the hybrid capture method. Of these, 64 patients (63%) had Pap smears which were read as being normal, having benign cellular changes, or having ASCUS (favor reactive process). Of these, 19 patients tested positive for both high-risk and low-risk subtypes, 32 patients tested positive only for high-risk subtypes, and 13 patients tested positive only for low-risk subtypes. CONCLUSION: HPV subtyping identifies a significant group of HIV-positive women who are at risk for developing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, although they may not show significant abnormalities on their Pap smears.     

The prevalence and significance of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA test in southern Malaysia and Singapore

Aim of Study: To investigate the prevalence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) and its associated cytological abnormalities among women attending cervical screening clinics in southern Malaysia and Singapore.
Method: Laboratory results of Hybrid Capture-II (Digene) HPV DNA and liquid-based cytology tests of consecutive women who had screening performed between January 2004 and December 2006 were studied retrospectively.
Results: Of 2364 women studied, the overall prevalence of high-risk HPV DNA detection rate was 25.6%. The prevalence peaked at 49.1% for women between 20 and 24 years old and declined to 23% among women between the age of 30 and 49 years. A small second peak of prevalence rate of 30% was observed among women above the age of 50 years old. 76.1% of the high-risk HPV infection regressed within the study period. An incidence infection rate of 16% was noted among a small group of women who had a second HPV DNA test. A total of 1153 women had both the HPV DNA and the cytology tests. Cytological abnormality (ASCUS or more) was detected in 8.9% in HPV DNA-positive group and in 3.1% in HPV DNA-negative group ( P  < 0.001). The risk ratio for HSIL was 9.8 for HPV-positive women compared to HPV-negative women. The prevalence of cytological abnormalities increased with increasing age of the women.
Conclusion: The epidemiology and clinical impact of high-risk HPV infection for women in Southern Malaysia and Singapore were indistinguishable from experience elsewhere. The apparent moderately high incidence of cervical cancer was explainable by suboptimal screening program.     

Accuracy of dry vaginal self-sampling for detecting high-risk human papillomavirus infection in cervical cancer screening: A cross-sectional study

Objective

Cervical cancer screening coverage remains insufficient in most countries. Testing self-collected samples for high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) could be an alternative to the Pap smear, but costs, sampling methods and transport issues hamper its wide use. Our objective was to compare diagnostic accuracy of 2 vaginal self-collection methods, a dry swab (vsc-DRY) or swab in liquid medium (vsc-LIQ), for detecting HR-HPV cervical infection assessed by a cervical clinician-collected sample in liquid medium (ccc-LIQ).

Methods

Women 20 to 65 years attending a Pap smear were recruited between September, 2009 and March, 2011. Each sample (3 per woman) underwent HPV DNA testing. Samples were classified as HR-HPV + with detection of at least one HR-HPV or probable HR-HPV type.

Results

Of 734 women included, 722 had complete HPV data. HR-HPV was detected in 20.9% of ccc-LIQ samples. Estimated sensitivity and specificity to detect HR-HPV in vsc-DRY samples were 88.7% and 92.5%, respectively, and in vsc-LIQ samples, 87.4% and 90.9%. Cytology findings were abnormal for 79 women (10.9%): among 27 samples of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, 25 were HR-HPV + in vsc-DRY, vsc-LIQ and ccc-LIQ samples. Among 6 samples of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, all were HR-HPV + in vsc-DRY samples, 1 was HR-HPV − in vsc-LIQ samples and 1 was HR-HPV − in ccc-LIQ samples.

Conclusions

Vaginal self-sampling with a dry swab is accurate to detect HR-HPV infection as compared with cervical clinician-collection and accurate as compared with cytology results. This cheap and easy-to-ship sampling method could be widely used in a cervical cancer screening program.     

A Study of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Pregnancy

Objective

To find the incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in pregnant women and compare Pap smear with the HPV DNA test in detecting HPV infection.

Materials and Methods

Hundred antenatal women, irrespective of gestational age, were enrolled as subjects in this prospective pilot study for blood investigations, wet mount examination of cervical discharge, Pap smear, and high-risk HPV DNA detection of cervical scrape by PCR. Women showing abnormality in Pap smear and/or those who were high-risk HPV DNA positive were subjected to colposcopy.

Results

The incidence of HPV-positive pregnant women was 18 %. Koilocytosis on Pap smear was observed in six women. Three high-risk HPV DNA-positive women showed changes consistent with CIN 1 on colposcopy.

Conclusions

The HPV DNA test is the most sensitive and reliable in detecting HPV infection as compared to Pap smear, but considering the cost of PCR, Pap smear screening of all antenatal women was recommended.     

Prevalence of genital human papillomavirus among Lebanese women

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV), and more specifically of HPV 16, in a group of Lebanese women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Type-specific prevalence of cervical HPV and the presence of cytological abnormalities were determined in a cohort of Lebanese women. The population included 1,026 women, 18-76 years, seeking routine gynecological care at a tertiary care center. Demographic and behavioral data were collected. HPV DNA was detected in cervical scrapes by polymerase chain reaction using consensus primers. Cervical cytological abnormalities were identified by Papanicoleau (Pap) smears. RESULTS: The mean age of our population was 40 +/- 11.3 years. General HPV DNA was detected in 50 patients (4.9%). The high-risk HPV type 16 DNA was detected in 31 patients (3%). Patients with HPV 16 were more likely to have an abnormal pap smear than those with negative tests (6.6% vs 1.6%, p < 0.05), and more likely, but not significantly, to be smokers (21.4% vs 18.4%, p = 0.5). The age-specific prevalence of HPV increased with age and peaked at 60-69 years. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of HPV in this small group of Lebanese women is similar to its prevalence in the Mediterranean countries. The presence of HPV, its known association with the development of cervical neoplasia, and the lack of a universal screening program for cervical cancer in our country should be used to enforce implementation of proper screening programs.     

Self-collecting a cervico-vaginal specimen for cervical cancer screening: An exploratory study of acceptability among medically underserved women in rural Appalachia

ObjectiveInnovative screening methods such as self-testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) may alleviate barriers to cervical cancer screening. The purpose of this exploratory study was to determine whether Appalachian Kentucky women would be amenable to self-collecting a cervico-vaginal specimen for HPV testing.MethodsWomen aged 30–64 who were overdue for guideline-recommended cervical cancer screening were recruited from a primary care clinic in southeastern Kentucky. The women were asked to self-collect a specimen, using a cervico-vaginal brush, based on verbal and printed directions provided by a research nurse. All study participants, regardless of laboratory-confirmed HPV status, received the same counseling on the importance of cervical cancer screening and offered navigation to follow-up Pap testing at the local health department.ResultsThirty-one women were approached and recruited to participate in the study, indicating a 100% acceptance rate of HPV self-testing. Of the 31 women, 26 tested negative for high-risk HPV and five tested positive. All of the women with negative results declined nurse navigation to Pap testing, whereas four of the five women with positive results accepted nurse navigation and received subsequent Pap smear screenings (all results were normal).ConclusionsAmong this sample of Appalachian Kentucky women, self-collecting a cervico-vaginal specimen for HPV testing was highly acceptable. This exploratory study provides impetus for larger studies among high-risk, medically underserved women in rural communities. Tailoring alternative cancer screening strategies to meet the complex needs of rural women is likely to lead to reductions in cervical cancer incidence and mortality among this vulnerable population.     

22234例子宫颈高危型HPV感染及亚型分布研究

目的:分析17种型别的高危型人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)在22234例子宫颈癌筛查中的感染率及亚型分布特点。方法:回顾性分析2018年1月1日至2019年1月1日22234例于华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院行子宫颈癌筛查患者高危型HPV感染率及感染亚型。结果:22234例接受子宫颈癌筛查患者中,一种或以上高危型HPV阳性者3574例(16.1%),其中HPV16或(和)HPV18阳性者703例(3.2%)。在3574例高危型HPV阳性女性中,最常见的高危HPV感染是HPV52(24.4%),其次为HPV58(16.5%)、HPV16(14.0%)、HPV53(12.6%)和HPV39(8.6%)。与HPV16阴性患者相比,在HPV16阳性的患者中,除HPV31、HPV35、HPV45、HPV26和HPV82以外的12种高危型HPV的感染风险均显著降低约2~5倍(OR 0.169~0.530,P<0.05);与HPV18阴性患者相比,HPV18阳性的患者中HPV16、HPV33、HPV39、HPV51、HPV52、HPV58和HPV53的感染风险均显著下降(P<0.05)。结论:女性高危型HPV感染率较高,最常见的高危型HPV是HPV52和HPV58感染,并且HPV16、18感染对多个其他型别高危型HPV感染有保护作用。     

Human papillomavirus typing in routine cervical smears. Results from a series of 3778 patients

AIM: As human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is a significant risk factor for cervical cancer, the aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of HPV detection techniques in predicting the presence or the development of a high-grade squamous intra epithelial lesion. Additional reasons for carrying out this investigation were as follows. It was considered that the clinical value of HPV typing may have been underestimated in certain previous reports, which based their findings on first-generation assays. Moreover, until the present investigation most studies only investigated the cases with abnormal smear findings and did not include long-term follow-up, nor detailed follow-up of women with a normal smear but positive HPV typing, although this patient subgroup is of particular interest. The patient population included 3778 women who underwent routine cytological cervical screening and who gave their informed consent to participate in this study, consisting of a cervical smear, HPV testing via a second-generation Hybrid Capture II assay (which is more sensitive than first-generation tests, and can detect 18 different HPV types, i.e., 13 oncogenic and five non-oncogenic types); and in the case of abnormal smear findings, colposcopic examination and directed biopsies of the sites of suspected lesions. The women with cytomorphologically normal cervical smears but which who HPV-positive were reexamined six months later. RESULTS: HPV findings were positive in 66 cases where the initial smear indicated the presence of a high-grade lesion with the diagnosis confirmed by biopsy in 65 cases; in 155 cases (76.1%) where the initial smear indicated the presence of a low-grade lesion; in 44 (57.1%) out of 77 smears indicating the presence of ASCUS-type (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance) lesions; and in 366 cases (10.5%) of apparently normal initial smears. After colposcopy and follow-up, a final diagnosis of high-grade lesion was made for 85 patients. All these patients were found to have high-risk (oncogene-positive) HPV at the first examination, but in only 65 cases (76.5%) was the initial smear indicative of a high-grade lesion. Finally, in the patient groups with low-grade or ASCUS-type smear findings or with an apparently normal smear, a high-grade lesion was only found in those patients with persistent high-risk HPV infection. In all, the sensitivity of the Hybrid Capture II assay in detecting high-grade lesions was 100% versus 85.9% for standard cytology. However, its specificity (86.3%) and positive predictive value were not as high as the latter. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that HPV typing via this second-generation assay displays good sensitivity for the detection of at-risk cases, i.e., those involving the presence or development of high-grade cervical lesions. However, a number of issues have to be addressed before HPV typing is adopted in clinical practice, such as the fairly high HPV prevalence in women aged over 60 years, and whether the implications of this are the same as for younger age groups. Also, the present cost of complete typing remains too high for it to be used on a widespread scale. Nevertheless, HPV typing may have a useful role to play in the detection of cervical cancer.     

HPV detection and genotyping as an earlier approach in cervical cancer screening of the female genital tract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the leading risk factor for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cervical cancer. More than 100 virus genotypes have been identified so far, some of them strongly associated with the development of neoplasia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of the different HPV genotypes in women presenting no cytological alterations in cervical cells, in women presenting light alterations, and in women presenting severe alterations at routine gynecological examination. We retrospectively analyzed 97 HPV results of women submitted to cervical cancer screening compared to their Papanicolaou and colposcopy examinations. Data were analyzed individually and within groups to correlate the HPV genotypes identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and the respective alterations in cervical cells. Among the nine cases diagnosed as CIN I (9.3%), two were positive for low-risk HPV genotypes (22%), and the other seven were negative for HPV by PCR (78%). CIN II or CIN III diagnoses were associated with positive HPV results by PCR in four cases (36%), for high-risk as well as low-risk genotypes. There were two patients with severe cytological alterations in cervical cells, but with an indeterminate HPV genotype (18%), and one case with a negative HPV result (9%). Among the 57 cases without cytological alterations, seven were positive for low-risk HPV (12%) and two for high-risk HPV genotypes (3.5%). In the 48 remaining cases, we observed one with an indeterminate HPV genotype (2%), and the other 47 were negative for HPV by PCR (47%). Our study demonstrates an important prevalence of high- and low-risk HPV genotypes in our population, including those not present in the commercially available vaccine, even in patients with no evidence of cytological alterations in cervical cells. These results highlight the usefulness of HPV detection and typing as an early approach for cervical cancer screening and prevention.     

Telomerase activity in Papanicolaou smear-negative exfoliated cervical cells and its association with lesions and oncogenic human papillomaviruses

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to evaluate telomerase activity in exfoliated cervical cells and its association with cytology, pathology, and human papillomavirus (HPV). METHODS: Telomerase activity and HPV DNA sequences were examined in the exfoliated cervical cells from a general population of 245 women aged more than 30 years undergoing routine cervical screening by Papanicolaou smear. The women who were found to have telomerase activity or abnormal cytology in their exfoliated cervical cells were examined for cervical lesions by colposcopy and biopsy. RESULTS: Cytology for our population (mean, 56 years) revealed only one abnormal smear (1/245, 0.4%), in which a cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade I (CIN I) lesion was found. The exfoliated cervical cells used to prepare the smear were negative for telomerase and contained low-risk HPV DNA. Telomerase activity was found in 16 exfoliated cell samples (16/245, 6.5%); high-risk HPV DNA was found in 9 of these samples (9/16, 56%) and 9 of the biopsy specimens that could be evaluated from patients testing positive for telomerase revealed CIN I lesions (9/11, 82%). CONCLUSIONS: Telomerase activity is often associated with high-risk HPV infection and it is suggested that telomerase assay can help to detect occult cervical lesions.     

Baseline human papillomavirus status of women with abnormal smears in cervical screening: a 5-year follow-up study in The Netherlands

Objective  To determine in a screening population the human papillomavirus (HPV) status in those with cytological abnormalities and to evaluate the presence of high-risk (HR) HPV with a minimum of 5-year follow up.
Design  Retrospective examination of HPV status on prospectively collected and cytologically screened cervical smears.
Setting  Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital in Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Population  Three hundred and fifty-seven women aged 30–60 years, from the population screened.
Methods  Three hundred and fifty-seven women with borderline or higher cytological abnormalities were retrospectively examined for HPV with DNA microarray typing. Follow up was through the nationwide Dutch Pathology database (PALGA).
Main outcome measures  For the cytological abnormalities, the CISOE-A classification was used. HPV was scored as negative or positive. In case of positive HPV polymerase chain reaction, the HPV genotype was determined. The occurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia lesions of grade 3 or higher was considered as endpoint for follow up.
Results  The majority of the women with borderline cytology in this study were HPV negative (87%). Among the HPV-positive women in borderline cytology group, 74% had HR-HPV or probable high-risk types. The overall percentage of HR-HPV types increased with progressive cytological abnormalities. The cytological classifications of borderline dyskaryosis and moderate dyskaryosis contain all types of HPVs, e.g. low risk, HR and unknown risk. The samples with severe dyskaryosis or higher contain only HR types. The negative predictive value for HR-HPV typing in the group with borderline cytological abnormalities is more than 99%.
Conclusions  In cervical screening with an interval of 5 years, HPV can be reliably used as triage point in cases of borderline cytological abnormalities.     

Type-specific human papillomavirus DNA testing with the genotyping array: a comparison of cervical and vaginal sampling

Objective

To compare the detection and typing of human papillomavirus (HPV) between vaginal and cervical specimens by using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based reverse-blot genotyping arrays.

Study design

Two hundred and fifty-two women were referred to colposcopy clinics because of suspicious or positive results in a community-based cervical cancer-screening program. Genital tract cells were sampled from the cervix and self-collected from the vagina and tested with the HPV Blot kit.

Results

The HPV Blot kit identified HPV infection in 24.7% of vaginal specimens and in 30.2% of cervical collections. Cervical sampling detected significantly more infections compared to vaginal sampling only for HPV type 52; cervical sampling also detected significantly more high-risk HPV infection overall. The sensitivities of detecting histology ≥cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 3 using the HPV Blot in vaginal and cervical specimens were 75.0% (95% CI, 47.6-92.7%) and 87.5% (95% CI, 61.6-98.4%), respectively (P = 0.48). Both sampling methods were thus statistically effective at detecting high-grade lesions and cervical cancer (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

The HPV Blot yielded similar results for both vaginal sampling and cervical sampling in the detection of CIN grade 3 or worse. These findings indicate that self-sampling for HPV testing is a viable cervical cancer screening option.