A controlled trial of corticosteroids to prevent restenosis after coronary angioplasty. M-HEART Group

A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted to determine if corticosteroids influence the development of restenosis after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Either placebo or 1.0 g methylprednisolone (steroid) was infused intravenously 2-24 hours before planned PTCA in 915 patients. The PTCA patient success rate was 87% (mean) in the eight centers. There were no differences in clinical or angiographic baseline variables between the two groups. End-point analysis (angiographic restenosis, death, recurrent ischemia necessitating early restudy, and coronary artery bypass graft surgery) showed that there was no significant difference comparing placebo- with steroid-treated patients. Angiographic restudy showed the lesion restenosis rate to be 39% (120 of 307 lesions) after placebo and 40% (117 of 291) after steroid treatment (p = NS). We conclude that pulse steroid pretreatment does not influence the overall restenosis rate after successful PTCA.     

Efficacy of repeat percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for coronary restenosis

The short- and long-term outcome of patients within the NHLBI PTCA Registry who underwent repeat PTCA for coronary restenosis were analyzed. Of 1,880 patients in whom an initial PTCA was successful, 203 had a repeat PTCA attempted after restenosis developed. Repeat PTCA was usually performed within 6 months of the first procedure. The success rate of repeat PTCA was 85.2%. As a direct result of repeat PTCA, 1.5% of patients had an MI and 2% required emergency CABG. No patien died as a result of the attempted second procedure. One to 3 years of follow-up information was available in 94% of eligible patients. Most patients (75,9%) did not have a subsequent (third) PTCA, CABG or an MI. The late mortality rate was 0.8%. Angiographic follow-up information was available in 62 patients. Sustained enhancement of the diameter of the redilated lesion was observed in 66%. Thus, repeat PTCA has a high success and a low complication rate. Most patients did not have subsequent restenosis and are free of angina. Hence, repeat PTCA should be recommended for patients who have restenosis and should be considered as an integral component of PTCA therapy.     

A randomized comparison of repeat stenting with balloon angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis

OBJECTIVES: This randomized trial compared repeat stenting with balloon angioplasty (BA) in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). BACKGROUND: Stent restenosis constitutes a therapeutic challenge. Repeat coronary interventions are currently used in this setting, but the recurrence risk remains high. METHODS: We randomly assigned 450 patients with ISR to elective stent implantation (224 patients) or conventional BA (226 patients). Primary end point was recurrent restenosis rate at six months. Secondary end points included minimal lumen diameter (MLD), prespecified subgroup analyses, and a composite of major adverse events. RESULTS: Procedural success was similar in both groups, but in-hospital complications were more frequent in the balloon group. After the procedure MLD was larger in the stent group (2.77 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.25 +/- 0.5 mm, p < 0.001). At follow-up, MLD was larger after stenting when the in-lesion site was considered (1.69 +/- 0.8 vs. 1.54 +/- 0.7 mm, p = 0.046). However, the binary restenosis rate (38% stent group, 39% balloon group) was similar with the two strategies. One-year event-free survival (follow-up 100%) was also similar in both groups (77% stent vs. 71% balloon, p = 0.19). Nevertheless, in the prespecified subgroup of patients with large vessels (> or =3 mm) the restenosis rate (27% vs. 49%, p = 0.007) and the event-free survival (84% vs. 62%, p = 0.002) were better after repeat stenting. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ISR, repeat coronary stenting provided better initial angiographic results but failed to improve restenosis rate and clinical outcome when compared with BA. However, in patients with large vessels coronary stenting improved the long-term clinical and angiographic outcome.     

A randomized placebo-controlled trial of fluvastatin for prevention of restenosis after successful coronary balloon angioplasty; final results of the fluvastatin angiographic restenosis (FLARE) trial.

BACKGROUND: The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitors competitively inhibit biosynthesis of mevalonate, a precursor of non-sterol compounds involved in cell proliferation. Experimental evidence suggests that fluvastatin may, independent of any lipid lowering action, exert a greater direct inhibitory effect on proliferating vascular myocytes than other statins. The FLARE (Fluvastatin Angioplasty Restenosis) Trial was conceived to evaluate the ability of fluvastatin 40 mg twice daily to reduce restenosis after successful coronary balloon angioplasty (PTCA). METHODS: Patients were randomized to either placebo or fluvastatin 40 mg twice daily beginning 2-4 weeks prior to planned PTCA and continuing after a successful PTCA (without the use of a stent), to follow-up angiography at 26+/-2 weeks. Clinical follow-up was completed at 40 weeks. The primary end-point was angiographic restenosis, measured by quantitative coronary angiography at a core laboratory, as the loss in minimal luminal diameter during follow-up. Clinical end-points were death, myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft surgery or re-intervention, up to 40 weeks after PTCA. RESULTS: Of 1054 patients randomized, 526 were allocated to fluvastatin and 528 to placebo. Among these, 409 in the fluvastatin group and 427 in the placebo group were included in the intention-to-treat analysis, having undergone a successful PTCA after a minimum of 2 weeks of pre-treatment. At the time of PTCA, fluvastatin had reduced LDL cholesterol by 37% and this was maintained at 33% at 26 weeks. There was no difference in the primary end-point between the treatment groups (fluvastatin 0.23+/-0.49 mm vs placebo 0.23+/-0.52 mm, P=0.95) or in the angiographic restenosis rate (fluvastatin 28%, placebo 31%, chi-square P=0.42), or in the incidence of the composite clinical end-point at 40 weeks (22.4% vs 23.3%; logrank P=0.74). However, a significantly lower incidence of total death and myocardial infarction was observed in six patients (1.4%) in the fluvastatin group and 17 (4.0%) in the placebo group (log rank P=0.025). CONCLUSION: Treatment with fluvastatin 80 mg daily did not affect the process of restenosis and is therefore not indicated for this purpose. However, the observed reduction in mortality and myocardial infarction 40 weeks after PTCA in the fluvastatin treated group has not been previously reported with statin therapy. Accordingly, a priori investigation of this finding is indicated and a new clinical trial with this intention is already underway.     

A randomized trial of the low-molecular-weight heparin certoparin to prevent restenosis following coronary angioplasty.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) certoparin in preventing restenosis following balloon coronary angioplasty. BACKGROUND: Restenosis following coronary angioplasty continues to limit the long-term efficacy of this procedure. Animal studies have indicated a potential role for LMWH in reducing restenosis by limiting smooth muscle proliferation. METHODS: This study tested the effects of certoparin, self-administered for 3 months, in reducing restenosis following balloon coronary angioplasty. One hundred and eighteen patients with 158 lesions treated with angioplasty were enrolled in this randomized, placebo-controlled trial. One hundred and two patients completed the study. The endpoint was relative loss measured with quantitative coronary angiography. RESULTS: The relative loss for placebo was 0.19 +/- 0.23 compared to 0.14 +/- 0.21 for LMWH (p = NS). The minimum lumen diameter (MLD) was 1.47 +/- 0.66 for placebo and 1.40 +/- 0.57 for the LMWH (p = NS). There was a reduction (31% for LMWH; 49% for placebo PSDP) in the percent of patients having binary restenosis (MLD < 50% of reference diameter). At the end of the study 77% of the placebo patients and 76% of the LMWH group were asymptomatic (p = NS). There was a low rate of bleeding complications and these were minor. Bone density scans showed that there was no significant occurrence of osteoporosis with 3 months of LMWH. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of certoparin for 3 months is safe, but appears ineffective in reducing post-PTCA restenosis.     

Oral administration of glycine in the prevention of restenosis after coronary angioplasty. A double blind placebo controlled randomized feasibility trial evaluating safety and efficacy of glycine in the prevention of restenosis after angioplasty

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of safety, feasibility, and efficacy of oral administered glycine in prevention of angiographic restenosis six months after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: The amino acid glycine modulates immunological response and enhances the production of endothelial derived nitric oxide (EDNO) factor. This factor has been shown to possess anti-atherosclerotic properties, actions of which are thought to reduce neo-intimal hyperplasia. Furthermore, glycine significantly elevates arginine serum levels. This amino acid has been extensively studied for its effects on the endothelium, nitric oxide (NO) metabolism and effects on several biochemical pathways interfering with the process of restenosis after PCI. METHODS: A prospective double blind placebo controlled randomized study evaluated safety and feasibility of chronic oral administration of glycine. In addition, the efficacy was determined by evaluation of six months angiographic restenosis rates. RESULTS: 214 patients scheduled for elective PCI were randomized to receive glycine or placebo. At follow-up, there was no significant difference in side effects and in major adverse cardiac events (MACE) between both groups. Six-month angiograms revealed similar restenosis rates for the glycine group (17.5%) and for the placebo group (20.2%) (P = 0.82). CONCLUSION: Chronic oral administration of glycine was safe and feasible and had similar side effects compared to placebo. However, chronic oral administration of glycine did not lead to a significant reduction in restenosis rates at six months after elective PCI.     

Oral administration of glycine in the prevention of restenosis after coronary angioplasty. A double blind placebo controlled randomized feasibility trial evaluating safety and efficacy of glycine in the prevention of restenosis after angioplasty

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of safety, feasibility, and efficacy of oral administered glycine in prevention of angiographic restenosis six months after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: The amino acid glycine modulates immunological response and enhances the production of endothelial derived nitric oxide (EDNO) factor. This factor has been shown to possess anti‐atherosclerotic properties, actions of which are thought to reduce neo‐intimal hyperplasia. Furthermore, glycine significantly elevates arginine serum levels. This amino acid has been extensively studied for its effects on the endothelium, nitric oxide (NO) metabolism and effects on several biochemical pathways interfering with the process of restenosis after PCI. METHODS: A prospective double blind placebo controlled randomized study evaluated safety and feasibility of chronic oral administration of glycine. In addition, the efficacy was determined by evaluation of six months angiographic restenosis rates. RESULTS: 214 patients scheduled for elective PCI were randomized to receive glycine or placebo. At follow‐up, there was no significant difference in side effects and in major adverse cardiac events (MACE) between both groups. Six‐month angiograms revealed similar restenosis rates for the glycine group (17.5%) and for the placebo group (20.2%) (P = 0.82). CONCLUSION: Chronic oral administration of glycine was safe and feasible and had similar side effects compared to placebo. However, chronic oral administration of glycine did not lead to a significant reduction in restenosis rates at six months after elective PCI.     

西洛他唑与噻氯匹定预防冠心病支架置入术后冠状动脉再狭窄的效果对比

目的评价西洛他唑对冠状动脉支架术后再狭窄的影响。方法150例行冠状动脉支架术的患者随机分为西洛他唑组(试验组)和噻氯匹定组(对照组)。两组患者于术前48 h开始服用西洛他唑200 mg/d或噻氯匹定500 mg/d,西洛他唑组术后持续服药6个月,噻氯匹定组服药4周,并分别加用阿司匹林100 mg/d至术后6个月。出院后定期门诊随访,术后6个月复查冠状动脉造影。结果在随访中,试验组严重心脏事件发生率和严重药物副反应较对照组少。试验组和对照组在支架术后6个月造影中最小管径(2.24±1.16 mm比2.04±1.24 mm)、实际管径获得(2.73±0.45 mm比2.78±0.46 mm)、最终管径丢失(0.90±1.05 mm比1.06±1.14 mm)、丢失指数(0.34±0.40比0.38±0.40)和再狭窄率(28.0%比36.7%)差异均无统计学意义。结论西洛他唑在冠状动脉支架置入后预防急性或亚急性血栓并发症和降低晚期再狭窄率与噻氯匹定具有接近的作用,对于不能耐受噻氯匹定的患者,西洛他唑可以作为替代药物。     

Ineffectiveness of colchicine for the prevention of restenosis after coronary angioplasty.

Colchicine, an antimitogenic agent, has shown promise in preventing restenosis after coronary angioplasty in experimental animal models. A prospective trial was conducted involving 197 patients randomized in a 2:1 fashion to treatment with oral colchicine, 0.6 mg twice daily (130 patients), or placebo (67 patients) for 6 months after elective coronary angioplasty. Treatment in all patients began between 12 h before angioplasty and 24 h after angioplasty. Compliance monitoring revealed that 96% of all prescribed pills were ingested. Demographic characteristics were similar in colchicine- and placebo-treated groups. A mean of 2.7 lesions/patient were dilated. Side effects resulted in a 6.9% dropout rate in the colchicine-treated patients. Complete quantitative angiographic follow-up was obtained in 145 patients (74%) with 393 dilated lesions. Quantitative angiographic measurements were obtained in two orthogonal views at baseline before angioplasty and immediately and at 6 months after angioplasty. The quantitative mean lumen diameter stenosis before angioplasty was 67% both in the 152 lesions in the placebo-treated group and in the 241 lesions in the colchicine-treated group; this value was reduced to 24% immediately after angioplasty in the lesions in both treatment groups. At the 6-month angiogram, lesions had restenosed to 47% lumen diameter narrowing in the placebo-treated group compared with 46% in the colchicine-treated group (p = NS). Forty-one percent of colchicine-treated patients developed restenosis in at least one lesion compared with 45% of the placebo-treated group (p = NS). In conclusion, colchicine was ineffective for preventing restenosis after coronary angioplasty.     

Medical approaches to prevention of restenosis after coronary angioplasty

Although initial success rates for coronary angioplasty have improved, the rate of restenosis within 6 months of the procedure has persisted at 30 to 40%. The relation of restenosis to initial success, recurrence of symptoms and risk factors suggests that high grade or total lesions, long lesions, lesions in the proximal left anterior descending artery or in saphenous grafts, and the absence of intimal dissection after angioplasty are associated with an increased risk of restenosis. Unstable angina, male sex and diabetes are clinical factors associated with a greater risk of restenosis. Pathologic specimens suggest that plaque splitting and disruption are found acutely after angioplasty, but that restenosis occurs as an excessive reparative, proliferative response of smooth muscle cells leading to recurrent luminal narrowing. A prospective analysis of therapeutic interventions to prevent restenosis, such as administering antiplatelet and lipid-lowering agents, intensive diabetic therapy and administration of calcium antagonists, is proposed. Problems with timing of studies, design and sample size are considered. Current recommendations for anti-restenosis therapy include antiplatelet therapy before and after angioplasty, administration of heparin in some patients and intensive risk factor intervention for the 6 months after the procedure.     

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty restenosis: potential prevention with laser balloon angioplasty

Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty may result primarily from the combination of a thrombogenic surface and local flow separation produced by disruption of the arterial wall and lumen. Elastic recoil and, perhaps, cellular proliferation further contribute to luminal compromise after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Laser balloon angioplasty, performed during the final inflation of an otherwise conventional balloon angioplasty procedure, uses the coagulative properties of Nd:YAG laser radiation to weld together disrupted tissue elements thermally, to reduce elastic recoil and to destroy viable arterial tissue. Studies in human postmortem atheromatous arteries and in animal models in vivo indicate that laser balloon angioplasty, by creating a lumen that approximates the size and smooth cylindrical shape of the balloon, should be effective in the treatment of important causes of restenosis.     

A prospective,randomized trial for the prevention of mucositis in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Oral mucositis is a complication common to many cancer therapies and produces considerable pain and morbidity. The present study reports a double-blind, prospective, randomized clinical trial testing the efficacy of a calcium phosphate mouth rinse (Caphosol) with fluoride treatments vs a standard regimen of fluoride rinsing and placebo tray treatments in 95 patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The days and severity of mucositis were prospectively evaluated. There were statistically significant decreases in days of mucositis (3.72 vs 7.22 P=0.001), duration of pain (2.86 vs 7.67, P=0.0001), dose of morphine (34.54 mg vs 122.78 mg), days of morphine (1.26 vs 4.02, P=0.0001) and days to the onset of engraftment ANC (absolute neurotrophil count)>200 mm(3) (11.12 vs 12.56) in the Caphosol and fluoride treatment group vs fluoride-rinse group, respectively. Caphosol, a neutral, supersaturated, Ca(2+)/PO(4)(3-) mouth rinse, used in combination with topical fluoride treatments, is superior to fluoride rinse alone in reducing the frequency, intensity and duration of oral mucositis in patients undergoing HSCT.     

Local delivery of argatroban for the prevention of restenosis after coronary balloon angioplasty: a prospective randomized pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Effective pharmacological prevention of restenosis using the systemic administration of various drugs that were effective for the prevention of restenosis in experimental studies has not been reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the local delivery of a potent thrombin inhibitor, argatroban, using a local drug delivery device would prevent restenosis after plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA). METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy patients with chronic coronary artery disease requiring POBA were randomly assigned to wither the control group (n=35) or the argatroban group (n=35). In the argatroban group, argatroban was administered intravenously for 30 min before the POBA and intracoronarily into the dilated site using a Dispatch catheter immediately after the POBA, followed by a postoperative intravenous infusion for 4 h. The angiographical lesion restenosis and clinical restenosis rates at follow-up were significantly lower in the argatroban group (27% and 14%) than in the control group (56% and 37%; p=0.02 and p=0.03, respectively). There was no major complication during the procedure. CONCLUSION: The local delivery of argatroban is safe and effective in preventing restenosis after balloon angioplasty.