Late Retesting of System Performance in ICD Patients Without Spontaneous Shocks

One hundred five implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients (71 ± 9 years of age, 83% men) without spontaneous ICD discharges for ≥ 12 months were tested to assess high voltage (HV) circuit integrity and the system's ability to recognize and terminate ventricular fibrillation (VF). Indications for ICD implantation were sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) (35%), cardiac arrest (27%), and inducible VT (38%). Eighty-two percent of the patients had coronary artery disease (CAD), and the mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 36%± 13%. Results: One hundred patients had inducible VF and five did not. Testing led to ICD reprogramming in 50 (49%) patients. Two (1.9%) patients required ICD replacement: (1) a 45-year-old patient with a Ventritex 110 ICD implanted for 13 months interfaced with a CPI 0062 lead implanted for 46 months could not be defibrillated internally (impedance nonmeasurable); (2) an 82-year-old patient with a 23-month-old Medtronic 7219 ICD interfaced with 6936 and 6933 leads whose defibrillation threshold (DFT) had doubled since implantation (24 J from 12 J). Lead fractures were found in both cases (proximal coil of the 0062, and subcutaneously in the 6933). Based on DFT determinations, the first shock output was programmed lower in 37 patients and higher in 10 patients. Shock pulse width was changed in one patient and the ventricular refractory period in another. No programming changes were made in 54 (51%) patients. Conclusions: (1) Late testing of HV circuit integrity in ICD patients without an ICD shock in ≥ 12 months identifies previously unsuspected HV lead fractures; (2) chronic DFT testing resulted in HV output reprogramming in one-half of the patients.     

Ventricular Arrhythmia Inducibility Predicts Subsequent ICD Activation in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Patients: A DEFINITE Substudy

Objectives: We evaluated whether electrophysiologic (EP) inducibility predicts the subsequent occurrence of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) in the Defibrillators in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Treatment Evaluation (DEFINITE) trial.
Background: Inducibility of ventricular arrhythmias has been widely used as a risk marker to select implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) candidates, but is believed not to be predictive in nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients.
Methods: In DEFINITE, patients randomized to the ICD arm, but not the conventional arm, underwent noninvasive EP testing via the ICD shortly after ICD implantation using up to three extrastimuli at three cycle lengths plus burst pacing. Inducibility was defined as monomorphic or polymorphic VT or VF lasting 15 seconds. Patients were followed for a median of 29 ± 14 months (interquartile range = 2–41). An independent committee, blinded to inducibility status, characterized the rhythm triggering ICD shocks.
Results: Inducibility, found in 29 of 204 patients (VT in 13, VF in 16), was associated with diabetes (41.4% vs 20.6%, P = 0.014) and a slightly higher ejection fraction (23.2 ± 5.9 vs 20.5 ± 5.7, P = 0.021). In follow-up, 34.5% of the inducible group (10 of 29) experienced ICD therapy for VT or VF or arrhythmic death versus 12.0% (21 of 175) noninducible patients (hazard ratio = 2.60, P = 0.014).
Conclusions: In DEFINITE patients, inducibility of either VT or VF was associated with an increased likelihood of subsequent ICD therapy for VT or VF, and should be one factor considered in risk stratifying nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients.     

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of the New Cardioverter Defibrillator Systems

Clinical efficacy and safety of two new third-generation implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) were studied in 38 patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF). There were 31 patients with coronary disease, three patients with right ventricular dysplasia, one patient with dilated cardiomyopathy, and three patients with valvular disease. Twenty-four patients (group I) received an ICD with monophasic (Ventak PRx 1700, CPI) and 14 patients (group II) with biphasic shocks (Cadence V 100, Ventritex). Intraoperatively, the mean defibrillation threshold was significantly lower in group II than in group I, both in patients with induced VT (group I 11.0 ± 6.3 joules: group N 5.8 ± 1.3 joules) (P < O.01) and induced VF (group I 17.5 ± 4.6 joules; group II 9.6 ± 5.2 joules) (P < O.O1). During the mean follow-up of 12 ± 7 months four patients (11%) died. 865 arrhythmia events (AE) occurred and were terminated by ATP (671 VTs, 78%). Acceleration of VTs was observed in 28 AE (3%) and ATP was unable to interrupt 58 AE (7%). ICD shocks were delivered as a first therapy in 108 AE (13%).     

Do Traditional VT Zones Improve Outcome in Primary Prevention ICD Patients?

Aims: We reviewed outcomes in our primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) population according to whether the device was programmed with a single ventricular fibrillation (VF) zone or with two zones including a ventricular tachycardia (VT) zone in addition to a VF zone. Methods: This retrospective study examined 137 patients with primary prevention ICDs implanted at our institution between 2004 and 2006. Device programming and events during follow‐up were reviewed. Outcomes included all‐cause mortality, time to first shock, and incidence of shocks. Results: Eighty‐seven ICDs were programmed with a single VF zone (mean >193 ± 1 beats per minute [bpm]) comprising shocks only. Fifty ICDs had two zones (mean VT zone >171 ± 2 bpm; VF zone >205 ± 2 bpm), comprising antitachycardia pacing (100%), shocks (96%), and supraventricular (SVT) discriminators (98%) . Discriminator “time out” functions were disabled. Mean follow‐up was 30 ± 0.5 months and similar in both groups. All‐cause mortality (12.6% and 12.0%) and time to first shock were similar. However, the two‐zone group received more shocks (32.0% vs 13.8% P = 0.01). Five of 16 shocks in these patients were inappropriate for SVT rhythms. The single‐zone group had no inappropriate shocks for SVTs. Eighteen of 21 appropriate shocks were for ventricular arrhythmias at rates >200 bpm (three VF, 15 VT). This suggests that primary prevention ICD patients infrequently suffer ventricular arrhythmias at rates <200 bpm and that ATP may play a role in terminating rapid VTs. Conclusions: Patients with two‐zone devices received more shocks without any mortality benefit. (PACE 2010; 1353–1358)     

Effect of Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy on the Incidence of Shocks in Patients who Receive an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator after a Single Episode of Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia/Fibrillation

Seventy-four patients (16 women, 58 men, age 58 ± 21 years, mean ± standard deviation) who received an implantable Cardioverter de/ibrillator (ICD) after experiencing a single episode of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation were followed to determine if antiarrhythmic drug therapy affects the incidence of ICD discharges. Thirty-three patients (group A) were treated with an antiarrhythmic drug that was either untested or previously demonstrated during electropharmacological testing to be ineffective in suppressing the induction of ventricular tachycardia. Forty-one patients (group B) were not treated with an antiarrhythmic drug. There were no significant differences between the two groups in regards to age, sex, incidence of coronary artery disease, left ventricular function or the type of ICD pulse generator used. During a mean follow-up of 14 months for the entire cohort, 15 patients (46%) in group A and 18 patients (44%) in group B experienced at least one ICD shock. The time to the first appropriate shock (5 ± 5 months in both groups) and the frequency of ICD shocks (0.3 ± 0.2/month in group A vs 0.4 ± 0.5/month in group B) were similar in both groups. The incidence of syncope at the time of ICD discharge was higher in group A than group B patients (31% vs 5%, P < 0.05). In conclusion, antiarrhythmic drugs that are untested or have failed electropharmacological testing do not appear to reduce the probability of ICD discharge over a short-term (mean 14 months) follow-up in patients who have had only one clinical episode of VT/VF and may increase the risk of syncope during ICD discharge. Studies with a larger sample size and longer follow-up period will be needed to confirm these findings.     

Early Benefit of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy in Patients Waiting for Cardiac Transplantation

The ICD can effectively recognize and treat ventricular arrhythmias that can lead to sudden death. Sudden death is a major problem in patients awaiting heart transplantation. We reviewed our experience with the ICD in patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias waiting for cardiac transplantation. Nineteen patients were included. Seventeen were men, mean age was 54 ±11 years (range 17–66) and the left ventricular ejection fraction was 22%± 10% (range 9%–46%). After a mean follow–up of 6 ± 5 months (range 1–20 months), 17 patients reached heart transplantation. One patient died and the other is waiting for a transplant. Before transplantation 71 % of patients received an appropriate discharge. The mean time to the first appropriate discharge was 2 ± 2 months (range < 1–6 months), which was significantly shorter than the mean time to first discharge in the other patients (n = 182) receiving a defibrillator in our center (11 ±10 months; range 1–58 months) (P < 0.0004). In conclusion, cardiac transplantation candidates with life–threatening ventricular arrhythmias can effectively be protected against sudden arrhythmic death by ICD. These patients have a high incidence of appropriate shocks occurring very early after implantation.     

The Value of Electrophysiology Study and Prophylactic Implantation of Cardioverter Defibrillator in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Fifty-three consecutive patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and no history of sudden death underwent electrophysiology (EP) study. Sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) was induced in 19 patients (35%). Patients with prior syncope or near syncope had a higher incidence of VT/VF inducibility. An implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) was placed in 14 of the 19 patients. Of the remaining 5 patients with inducible VT/VF, three refused ICD implantation, while two underwent septal myectomy and VT/VF was no longer inducible afier the operation. None of the patients received antiarrhythmic drugs. During a mean follow-up period of 47 ± 31 (2–117) months, no events occurred in the 34 patients with negative EP study. Three events occurred among the 19 patients with inducible VT/VF. One patient died suddenly, one developed wide complex tachycardia which required resuscitation, and one patient received an appropriate ICD shock. In conclusion, sustained polymorphic VT/VF was inducible in about one-third of patients with HCM. Noninducibility of VT/VF appeared to predict a favorable prognosis. Although the overall event rate was low in patients with inducible VT/VF, prophylactic ICD implantation in patients with multiple risk factors may be appropriate.     

Results of Delivered Therapy for VT or VF in Patients with Third-Generation Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators

Third-generation implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) offer tiered therapy and can provide significant advantage in the management of patients with life-threatening arrhythmias. Three different types of ICDs were implanted in 21 patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). Arrhythmia presentation was VT(76%), VF(10%), or both (14%). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction for the group was 32.4 ± 7%. No surgical mortality occurred. Prior to discharge individual EPS determined the final programmed settings of the ICDs. During a mean follow-up of 13 ± 1.4 months (range 2–20) the overall patient survival was 85.7%. No sudden arrhythmic or cardiac death occurred. Twenty of 21 patients (95%) received therapy by their device. In 14 patients (67%) antitachycardia pacing (A TP) was programmed "on," 13 of which was self-adaptative autodecremental mode. There were 247 VT episodes, 231 of which were subjected to ATP with 97% success and 3% acceleration or failure. Low energy shocks reverted all other VT episodes. VF episodes were successfully reverted by a single shock (93%), two shocks (6%), or three shocks (1 %). We conclude that ATP therapy of VT is successful in the large majority of episodes with rare failures, and that VF episodes are generally terminated by a single ICD shock.     

Ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients receiving an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for primary versus secondary prophylaxis indications

Introduction: Data on the mechanisms of sudden cardiac death are limited and may be biased by delays in rhythm recording and selection bias in survivors. As a result, the relative contributions of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) (cycle length [CL] > 260 ms), monomorphic fast VT (FVT) (CL ≤ 260 ms), and polymorphic VT (PMVT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) have not been well characterized nor compared in patients with and without prior arrhythmic events. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) recipients with primary or secondary implant indications was used to evaluate intracardiac electrograms (EGMs) for the first spontaneous VT/VF resulting in appropriate ICD therapy. EGMs were categorized into VT, FVT, and PMVT/VF based on CL and morphologic criteria. Results: Of 616 implants, 145 patients (58 [40%] primary indications) received appropriate ICD therapy for VT/VF over mean follow‐up of 3.8 ± 3.2 years. Primary implants had more diabetes (28% vs 12%; P = 0.02) and less antiarrhythmic use (15% vs 33%; P = 0.02). In those patients with spontaneous arrhythmia, PMVT/VF occurred in 20.7% of primary versus 21.8% of secondary implants, FVT in 19.0% versus 21.8%, and VT in 60.3% versus 56.4%, respectively (P = 0.88). Spontaneous VT CL was similar regardless of implant indication (284 ± 56 [primary] vs 286 ± 67 ms [secondary]; P = 0.92). Conclusions: Monomorphic VT is the most common cause of appropriate ICD therapy regardless of implant indication. These results provide insight into the mechanisms of sudden cardiac death and have implications for the use of interventions designed to limit ICD shocks. (PACE 2011; 34:571–576)     

Primary Prevention Implantation of Cardioverter Defibrillator without Defibrillation Threshold Testing: 2-Year Follow-up

Background: Even though the intraoperative threshold testing of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator ( ICD ) may cause hemodynamic impairment or be unfeasible, it is still considered required standard practice at the time of implantation. We compared the outcome of ICD recipients who underwent defibrillation threshold testing (DFT) with that of patients in whom no testing was performed.
Methods: A total of 291 subjects with ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy received transvenous ICDs between January 2000 and December 2004 in five Italian cardiology centers. In two centers, DFT was routinely performed in 137 patients (81% men; mean age 69 ± 9 years; mean ejection fraction 26 ± 4%) (DFT group), while three centers never performed DFT in 154 patients (90% men; mean age 69 ± 9 years; mean ejection fraction 27 ± 5%) (no-DFT group).
Results: We compared total mortality, total cardiovascular mortality, sudden cardiac death (SCD), and spontaneous episodes of ventricular arrhythmia (sustained ventricular tachycardia, VT, and ventricular fibrillation, VF) between these groups 2 years after implantation (median 23 months, 25th–75th percentile, 12–44 months). On comparing the DFT and no-DFT groups, we found an overall mortality rate of 20% versus 16%, cardiovascular mortality of 13% versus 10%, SCD of 3% versus 0.6%, VT incidence of 8% versus 10%, and VF incidence of 6% versus 4% (no significant difference in any comparison).
Conclusions: No significant differences in the incidence of clinical outcomes considered emerged between no-DFT and DFT groups. These results should be confirmed in larger prospective studies.     

Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Events in Patients with Asymptomatic Nonsustained Ventricular Tachycardia:

Primary prevention trials have demonstrated that patients with coronary disease, reduced left ventricular function, and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) have improved survival with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy, presumably secondary to effective termination of life-threatening arrhythmias. However, stored intracardiac electrograms were not always available and specific arrhythmias leading to ICD therapy were not always known. We examined the occurrence of ICD events in 51 consecutive patients who match the described patient profile to determine the frequency of appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapy. ICD detections were noted in 18 (35%) patients during a median follow-up period of 13.1 months. Appropriate therapy for sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) occurred in 11 (22%) patients, with appropriate shocks in 8 (16%) patients and appropriate antitachycardia pacing (ATP) in 4 (8%) patients. The time to first appropriate therapy occurred at a mean of 17 +/- 12 months (median 18 months, range 3-36 months). Inappropriate therapy occurred in 5 (10%) patients with inappropriate shocks in 4 patients and inappropriate ATP in 2 patients. Inappropriate therapy was delivered for supraventricular arrhythmias (SVAs) in 4 patients and for T wave oversensing in 1 patient. The reason for shock therapy was unknown in 1 patient (2%) due to ICD malfunction. The mean arrhythmia rate leading to appropriate therapy for VT/VF was 232 +/- 72 beats/min (range 181-400 beats/min), and the mean rate leading to inappropriate therapy for SVT was 168 +/- 10 beats/min (range 160-180 beats/min). Patients with coronary disease and asymptomatic NSVT commonly receive appropriate defibrillator therapy. These results support the need for ICD implantation for primary prevention, with attention to careful programming of the detection rate to prevent inappropriate therapy.     

Failure of Third-Generation Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators to Abort Shock Therapy for onsustained Ventricular Tachycardia Due to Shortcomings of the VF Confirmation Algorithm

Unnecessary shocks by ICDs for rhythms other than sustained VT or VF have been described as the most frequent adverse event in ICD patients. To avoid unnecessary shocks for self-terminating arrhythmias, the third-generation Jewel PCD defibrillators 7202, 7219, and 7220 Plus use a specially designed VF confirmation algorithm after charge end. The purpose of this study was to determine the ability of this VF confirmation algorithm to recognize nonsustained VT, and to analyze the reasons for failure of the PCD device to abort shock therapy for nonsustained VT despite use of this VF confirmation algorithm. Analysis of stored electrograms of electrical events triggering high voltage capacitor charging in the programmed VF zone of the device showed 36 spontaneous episodes of nonsustained VT (227 ± 21 beats/mm) during 18 ± 7 months follow-up in 15 patients who had a Jewel PCD implanted at our hospital. Intracardiac electrogram recordings and simultaneously retrieved marker channels demonstrated that the ICD shock was appropriately aborted according to the VF confirmation algorithm in 24 (67%) of 36 episodes of nonsustained VT. Twelve episodes (33%) of nonsustained VT, however, were followed by a spontaneous ICD shock in 6 (40%) of the 15 study patients. The only reason for all 12 shocks for nonsustained VT was the inability of the device to recognize the absence of VT after charge end due to shortcomings of the VF confirmation algorithm: 11 of the 12 shocks for nonsustained VT were triggered by the occurrence of paced beats during the VF confirmation period and 1 shock for nonsustained VT was triggered by the occurrence of 2 premature beats after charge end. Thus, better VF confirmation algorithms need to be incorporated in future PCD devices to avoid unnecessary shocks for nonsustained VT.     

Characteristics and relevance of clustering ventricular arrhythmias in defibrillator recipients

INTRODUCTION: Studies of recurrent ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) have been limited to "electrical storms," where recurrent arrhythmias necessitate repeated external cardioversions or defibrillations. Patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) may also suffer frequently recurrent arrhythmias. The aim of this study was to analyze the temporal pattern and the clinical relevance of clustering ventricular arrhythmias in ICD recipients. METHODS: The incidence and the type of arrhythmias were determined by reviewing stored electrograms. VT/VF clusters were defined as the occurrence of three or more adequate and successful ICD interventions within 2 weeks. Two hundred and fourteen consecutive ICD recipients were followed during an average of 3.3 +/- 2.2 years (698 patient-years). RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (24%) suffered 98 VT/VF clusters 21 +/- 22 months after ICD implantation, 93% of these clusters consisting of recurrent regular VT. Monomorphic VT as index event leading to ICD implantation was the only factor predicting VT/VF clusters. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the combined end-point of death or heart transplantation showed a 5-year event-free survival of 67% versus 87% in patients with and without clusters, respectively (P = 0.026). Adjusted hazard ratios for death or heart transplantation in the group with arrhythmia clusters was 3.5 (95% confidence interval 1.5-7.9 P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: VT/VF clusters are frequent late after ICD implantation particularly in patients who had VT as index-event. As arrhythmias and recurrent ICD interventions are responsible for an important morbidity, there is a possible role for a prophylactic intervention. Furthermore, VT/VF clusters are an independent marker of increased risk of death or need for heart transplantation.     

Electrocardiographically Documented Unnecessary, Spontaneous Shocks in 241 Patients With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators

The incidence and cause of electrocardiographically documented spontaneous implantuble Cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) discharges for a rhythm other than ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF) (unnecessary shocks) were determined in 241 patients who underwent ICD implantation between March 1983 and November 1991. During follow-up of 24 ± 20 months, 54 of 241 patients (22%) received a total of 132 unnecessary ICD shocks confirmed by Holler or telemetry monitoring or stored electrograms (Egs) from the ICD. The rhythm preceding these unnecessary ICD shocks was atrial fibrillation in 30 patients, sinus or supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in 11 patients, antitachycardia pacing triggered by atrial fibrillation or SVT resulting in VT in 5 patients, nonsustained VT in 3 patients, and normal sinus or pacemaker rhythm in 10 patients. Unnecessary ICD discharges occurred most frequently during the first week after implantation or generator replacement (18 of 54 patients [33%]). Unnecessary ICD discharges could be documented more often by stored Egs in patients with devices with Eg storage capability (Ventritex Cadence(tm), 19 of 54 patients [35%]) than by Holter or telemetry monitoring in patients with devices without Eg storage capabilities (34 of 193 patients [18%], P < 0.01), despite a shorter mean follow-up duration of 14 ± 9 months versus 26 ± 21 months, respectively. Only six of 54 patients (11%) in whom unnecessary ICD discharges occurred had recurrent unnecessary shocks during 22 ± 20 months of follow-up after treatment directed at the cause of the first episode or device reprogramming to preclude non-VT rhythm detection. In conclusion, unnecessary ICD shocks are a frequent complication of ICD therapy occurring in at least 22% of patients. The cause of these shocks is most frequently atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular response. The availability of Eg storage capabilities facilitates the diagnosis of the electrical event precipitating inappropriate ICD shocks. Diagnosis of the cause of unnecessary shocks allows for the institution of therapy that may reduce the risk for subsequent events.     

Safety of Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators and Severely Depressed Left Ventricular Function

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) in third-generation implantable Cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) for terminating spontaneously occurring ventricular tachycardias (VTs) in patients with severely depressed left ventricular (LV) function. Ninety-one patients with active ATP were followed for 16 ± 13 months. During this period, 775 VT episodes occurring in 36 patients were treated by ATP. The patients were divided into two groups according to their LV ejection fraction (LVEF): group A with LVEF ± 30% (n = 20), and group B with LVEF ± 30% (n = 16). There were no differences between both groups in age, gender, underlying heart disease, indication for ICD therapy, or drug therapy. The VT rates were comparable (group A: 183 ± 16 beats/min; group B: 180 ± 21 beats/min; P = NS). Eighty-three percent of all episodes (n = 332) in group A and 93% of the VTs (n = 443) in group B were ATP terminated (P ± 0.01). Ten percent of VTs in group A were accelerated by ATP into the ventricular fibrillation zone versus 2% in group B (P ± 0.01). The individual termination rate and acceleration rate per patient were comparable in both groups. All VT episodes unresponsive to ATP were converted by backup shocks. The efficacy of first-shock therapy was similar in both groups (group A: 89%; group B: 97%; P = NS). The proportion of patients who needed at least one backup shock for unsuccessful ATP was comparable in both groups (group A: 65%; group B: 56%; P= NS). We conclude that ATP is effective and safe in patients with recurrent VTs and severely depressed LV function, and it can be safely programmed in this group of patients to minimize the use of shock therapy.     

Ventricular Proarrhythmic Effects of Atrial Fibrillation are Modulated by Depolarization and Repolarization Anomalies in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) may have a ventricular proarrhythmic effect, particularly in the setting of heart failure. We assessed whether AF predicts appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and explored modulators of risk.
Methods and Results: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 215 consecutive patients with ICDs for primary prevention having a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35%. Mean age at ICD implantation was 61.0 ± 9.7 years and 17% were women. Overall, 22 patients (10.2%) experienced appropriate ICD shocks over a follow-up of 1.3 ± 0.7 years, corresponding to an actuarial event-rate of 5.8% per year. In univariate analysis, AF was associated with a 3.6-fold increased risk of appropriate shocks (P = 0.0037). Annual rates of appropriate ICD shocks in patients with and without AF were 12.9% and 3.5%, respectively (P = 0.0200). In multivariate stepwise Cox regression analyses controlling for baseline imbalances, demographic parameters, underlying heart disease, and therapy, history of AF independently predicted appropriate shocks (hazard ratio 2.7, P = 0.0278). Prolonged QRS duration (>130 ms) and QTc (>440 ms) modulated the effect of AF on appropriate shocks. Patients with both AF and QRS > 130 ms were more than five times more likely to receive an appropriate ICD shock (hazard ratio 5.4, P = 0.0396). Patients with AF and QTc > 440 ms experienced a greater than 12-fold increased risk of appropriate shocks (hazard ratio 12.7, P = 0.0177).
Conclusion: In prophylactic ICD recipients with left ventricular dysfunction, AF is associated with increased risk for ventricular tachyarrhythmias, particularly when combined with conduction and/or repolarization abnormalities.     

Transcutaneous T Wave Shock: A Universal Method for Ventricular Fibrillation Induction

Our objective was to develop a universal noninvasive method for VF induction. ICD implantation requires VF induction. Conventional rapid ventricular stimulation may fail to induce VF. Some ICDs can deliver low energy shocks on the T wave to induce VF. We hypothesized that an external dual chamber pacemaker and an external defibrillator could be configured to allow reliable VF induction with any ICD system. A surface ECC signal was delivered to the atrial channel of an external dual chamber DDD pacemaker. The 'AV' delay was adjusted so that the ventricular output of the pacemaker was delivered to an external defibrillator synchronized to deliver 5–50 J. Twenty-six patients at ICD implant or follow-up had VF induced in native rhythm (sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation), or during a ventricular pacing train (3–8 beats at cycle length 500–880 ms). VF was successfully induced in 14 of 25 (56%) patients in native rhythm; and in 16 of 17 (94%) patients during pacing (P = 0.013). VF induction success rate was 36% in native rhythm (31/86 attempts) and 88% during pacing (69/78 attempts) (P < 0.001). The 'R' to shock interval was 269 ± 31 ms in native rhythm and 257 ± 48 ms during pacing. Energy delivered from the external defibrillator was 19 ± 3 J in native rhythm and 21 ± 6 J during pacing. We concluded that VF induction by synchronizing a small external shock to the T wave is a fast, effective way to reliably ensure arrhythmia induction with any ICD at implant or follow-up. This method is more successful during pacing than in sinus rhythm.     

Value of Heart Rate Variability to Predict Ventricular Arrhythmias in Recipients of Prophylactic Defibrillators with Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy

GRIMM, W., et al. : Value of Heart Rate Variability to Predict Ventricular Arrhythmias in Recipients of Prophylactic Defibrillators with Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy. This study investigated the relation between heart rate variability (HRV) measured as standard deviation of normal to normal RR intervals (SDNN) on baseline 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram (ECG) and subsequent appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) interventions in 70 patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) in whom ICDs were implanted prophylactically in the presence of a low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). During   43 ± 26   months of follow-up, 26 of 70 (37%) study patients with IDC received one or more appropriate ICD interventions for sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) documented by electrograms stored in the ICD. Mean SDNN at ICD implant was   94 ± 33 ms   . No difference was found between patients with   (90 ± 25 ms)   versus without   (96 ± 37 ms)   appropriate ICD interventions for VT or VF during follow-up. Multivariate Cox regression analysis of baseline clinical characteristics including age, gender, LVEF, NYHA functional class, nonsustained VT on Holter, history of syncope, left bundle branch block, baseline medication and HRV revealed LVEF as the only significant predictor of arrhythmia. These findings do not support the use of HRV measured as SDNN on 24-hour ambulatory ECG to select patients with IDC for prophylactic ICD therapy. (PACE 2003; 26[Pt. II]:411–415)     

Shock on T versus direct current voltage for induction of ventricular fibrillation: a randomized prospective comparison

VF is induced during ICD implantation to determine efficacy of therapy. Establishing the best clinical method of induction of VF would potentially be beneficial in reducing the number of induction attempts and reducing the frequency of inadvertent induction of VT. Commonly used methods to induce VF include shock in the T wave vulnerable period (T shock) and high frequency stimulation. This study compared the efficacy of T shock with a new induction method using a 9-V DC pulse. The study was a randomized, prospective, case crossover trial in patients receiving ICDs. VF was induced by T shock and DC in a randomized sequence during an ICD implant. VF was induced at least four times in each patient (two T shocks and two DC inductions) and with each induction; attempts were continued with modifications until successful. A paired evaluation between the T shock/DC induction was performed in 37 patients (28 men, age 64 +/- 12 years) with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.40 +/- 0.20. Arrhythmia indications were VT (n = 23), VF (n = 10), and VT/VF (n = 4). Drug therapy included amiodarone (n = 10), metoprolol (n = 6), digoxin (n = 1), and lidocaine (n = 1). The average T shock voltage was 207.0 +/- 16.1 V. The S1 cycle drive length was consistently 400 ms, and the mean S2 coupling interval was 317.8 +/- 19.6 ms. The length of time DC applied averaged 3.8 +/- 1.4 seconds. A total of 148 episodes of VF were included in the analysis. T shock induced VF with a cycle length of 213.5 +/- 35.1 ms, and DC induced VF with a cycle length of 214.6 +/- 34.5 ms (P = 0.86). Although VF was eventually induced for each randomization, the number of attempts required were dependent on the method of induction. The successful DC first attempt VF induction rate was 96%, with three patients requiring two attempts during one of the DC inductions. T shock had a 68% first attempt success rate with 21 patients requiring multiple T shocks to induce VF. All nine female patients had at least one unsuccessful first attempt T shock, which contributed to an overall unsuccessful first attempt induction rate significantly higher in women then men (36.1% vs 12.5%, P = 0.001). A constant DC voltage induction of VF may be more effective than T shock for induction of VF in a clinical setting because it reduces the number of attempts required to induce VF. By either method, VF appears to be more difficult to induce in women. DC induction has the advantage of simple programming of only duration of stimulation. These findings have implications particularly for ICD implantation with conscious sedation.     

The Mean Ventricular Fibrillation Cycle Length: A Potentially Useful Parameter for Programming Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators

In programming the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), the ventricular tachycardia (VT) detection cycle length (CL) is based on the CL of the documented tachycardia but the ventricular fibrillation (VF) detection CL is set arbitrarily. Appropriate programming of VF detection may not only reduce the incidence of inappropriate ICD shocks for non-VF rhythms but can also avoid the fatal underdetection of VF. The mean VFCL may provide a useful parameter for optimal ICD programming for VF detection if it is reproducible. This study examined the intrapatient reproducibility and interpatient variation of the mean VFCL in 30 ICD patients (25 men and 5 women, mean age 63 ± 13 years). A total of 210 VF episodes (7 ± 4 per patient, range 3–17) induced by T-wave shocks (166) or AC (44) at the ICD implant (30 patients) and the predischarge test (12 of 30 patients) were analyzed. The mean VFCL was calculated from the stored V-V intervals in the ICDs. Although the mean VFCL varied significantly from 171 ± 6 to 263 ± 11 ms (P < 0.01) among different patients, it was reproducible among different VF episodes in an individual patient (maximal variation 4–50 ms, P > 0.05). The mean VFCL was not significantly different between patients with and without antiarrhythmic drugs (210 ± 32 vs 210 ± 23 ms, P > 0.05) and was correlated with the ventricular effective refractory period (r = 0.5, P < 0.05). The mean VFCL varies greatly among different patients but remains reproducible in an individual patient, suggesting that the mean VFCL may serve as a reference for ICD programming of VF detection.