Triplet chemotherapy combination with gemcitabine,cisplatin and ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: phase II study

A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination GIP (gemcitabine, ifosfamide, and cisplatin) for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thirty patients with stage III B/IV NSCLC were treated with a combination of GIP. Patients received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 administered intravenously on days 1 and 8, ifosfamide 3,500 mg/m2 on day 2, and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 2, repeated every 21 days. Two of the 30 patients (7%) showed a complete response and 14 patients (46%) showed a partial response. The overall response rate was 53%. The estimated median survival for all patients was 60 weeks. All patients enrolled onto the study were eligible for toxicity assessment. Toxicities were treatable and included World Health Organization grade III or IV leukopenia (29%), thrombocytopenia (18%), anemia (7%) and nausea, and vomiting (6%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 3 of 30 patients. There were no treatment-related deaths. The combination therapy of GIP is active, well tolerated, and easy to administer on an outpatient basis in advanced NSCLC.     

Phase I dose escalation study of vinorelbine and topotecan combination chemotherapy in patients with recurrent lung cancer

Background  

A platinum doublet is the current standard treatment for good performance status patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) with good performance status. However, platinum-based treatment may be associated with significant toxicities, therefore alternative platinum-free combinations should be investigated. Topotecan is a topoisomerase I inhibitor that exerts its cytotoxic effect through stabilization of the topoisomerase I-DNA complex. Preclinical data suggests synergy between topoisomerase I inhibitors and mitotic spindle poisons. Considerable hematologic toxicities have been reported with topotecan dosed for 5 consecutive days in combination with vinorelbine. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the optimal dosage and the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan and vinorelbine in patients with relapsed or refractory non-small cell or small cell lung cancer administered on an alternate dosing schedule.     

Phase II study of a three-drug combination of ifosfamide, cisplatin and vindesine in non-small-cell lung cancer

Between February 1986 and April 1987, we conducted a phase II clinical trial of a three-drug combination of ifosfamide, cisplatin, and vindesine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. The combination consisted of ifosfamide, 1,300 mg/m2, on days 1 through 5, cisplatin, 20 mg/m2, on days 1 through 5, and vindesine, 3 mg/m2, on days 1 and 8. Courses were repeated at 4-week intervals until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Of 21 patients evaluated, one had a complete response and 12 had partial response, with an overall response rate of 62%. The projected median response duration was 30 weeks. The median survival for all patients has not been reached: 14 of 21 patients are still alive with a median follow-up period of 41 weeks (range, 12 to 73 weeks). The major toxicity was myelosuppression. One patient died of septicemia while neutropenic, but the toxicity was well tolerated in the rest. These results indicate that this three-drug combination is active against non-small-cell lung cancer and warrants further clinical trials.     

A three-drug regimen (gemcitabine, ifosfamide and cisplatin) for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

We have carried out a pilot study on 25 non-small cell lung cancer patients, administering the combination of gemcitabine at the dose of 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, ifosfamide 1500 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2 (plus mesna as uroprotector) and cisplatin 40 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2, every 21 days. Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor was employed in all cases from day 10 to day 18 at the dose of 300 microg daily. An objective response was observed in 11 cases (44%). The regimen was active, but toxicity was remarkable with some cases of severe myelosuppression and mucositis.     

Phase I study of gemcitabine (GEM) and docetaxel (TXT) combination chemotherapy for unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer

A phase I study of gemcitabine (GEM) and docetaxel (TXT) combination chemotherapy was performed for unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer. Chemotherapy consisted of a fixed dose of GEM (1,000 mg/m2) on day 1, 8 and an escalated dose of TXT (50, 60, 70 mg/m2) on day 8 every 21 days, > or = 2 courses. Nine patients were entered (each dose level: 3 patients). Leukopenia, neutropenia, GOT increase, GPT increase, anorexia, fatigue, fever, and alopecia occurred, but no dose-limiting toxicity was found at any dose level and no MTD was reached. The recommended dose for the phase II study is GEM 1,000 mg/m2 and TXT 70 mg/m2 with consideration of application to outpatients and continuing courses.     

Pilot study with cisplatin, ifosfamide, and etoposide in advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma

Twenty-five patients with advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) were treated with a multidrug regimen (CIV) consisting of ifosfamide (IFX), cisplatin (CDDP), and etoposide (VP-16). Twenty-four patients were evaluable for response. An objective response was detected in eight cases (33%), including one case with complete tumor response. Median duration of response was 31 weeks, and median overall survival 46 weeks, with no significant difference between responders and nonresponders. Myelosuppression and gastrointestinal side effects represented the main toxic manifestations; a toxic death and an ischemic cardiac episode were also observed. CIV seems a moderately effective regimen in NSCLC, but unlikely to provide an advantage over the widely employed two-drug combination of CDDP and VP-16.     

Phase II study with gemcitabine, ifosfamide and cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The aim of the present study was to determine the clinical activity and toxicity of a novel chemotherapy combination regimen of gemcitabine, ifosfamide and cisplatin (GIP), administered every 3 weeks, in patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). From October 1998 to July 1999, 18 previously untreated stages IIIb (4) and IV (14) patients were enrolled into the study. Gemcitabine and ifosfamide (with mesna as uroprotection) was administered on days 1 and 6, at a dose of 1000 and 1500 mg/m², respectively; and cisplatin was given on day 1 at a dose of 60 mg/m², every 3 weeks. All 18 patients were evaluable for response and toxicity profiles. One patient achieved a complete response, and 11 patients achieved a partial response, with an overall response rate of 66.7% (95% CI, 45–89%). The main toxicity was hematological, a NCI grade 3–4 neutropenia in 16 patients (88.9%) during the treatment course. Febrile neutropenia occurred in three patients (16.6%). Grade 3 anemia occurred in eight patients (44.4%) and grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 11 patients (61.1%). Non-hematological toxicity was mild and tolerable. No toxic death occurred. The median survival was 12.7 months and 1 year survival was 58.4%. The GIP combination chemotherapy produced a high response rate in advanced NSCLC; however, there was a relatively high percentage of hematological toxicity that still could be tolerated. A randomized trial comparing GIP to a two-drug combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin is planned.     

Phase I study of gemcitabine hydrochloride (LY 188011) combination therapy with cisplatin in the patients with non-small cell lung cancer]

The combination Phase I study of gemcitabine hydrochloride with cisplatin was conducted in the patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at 5 investigation sites. Gemcitabine was administrated on day 1, 8 and 15 and cisplatin on day 1 of each 28-day cycle. The dosage of cisplatin was fixed to 80 mg/m2 and the dosage of Gemcitabine was gradually escalated in 3 dosing level from 600, 800 to 1,000 mg/m2. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended dose was determined with Continual Reassessment Method. For each dose level, 6 cases, 3 cases and 6 cases were registered respectively and all 15 cases were evaluable. In the dose level 3 with 1,000 mg/m2 of gemcitabine and 80 mg/m2 of cisplatin, grade 4 neutropenia was observed as DLT in 3 out of 6 cases, thus dose level 3 was considered as MTD and the recommended dose. Major adverse events were leukopenia, neutropenia, nausea/vomiting and anorexia. The incidence of such adverse events seemed to be dose-dependent and especially the grade of neutropenia seemed to be more serious as the dose increased. Also, the grade of liver function tests abnormal seemed to be more serious as the dose increased but the incidence as well as the grade did not have tendency of dose-dependent in another events including renal function tests abnormal. On the other hand, as to the efficacy PR was observed in 4 out of 15 cases. Based upon the results, it is necessary to discuss further the efficacy in the recommended dose in the combination therapy of gemcitabine and cisplatin.     

Phase I/II study of cisplatin, ifosfamide and irinotecan with rhG-CSF support in patients with stage IIIB and IV non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose: We conducted a phase I/II study in previously untreated patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to: (1) determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of cisplatin combined with a fixed schedule of ifosfamide and irinotecan with rhG-CSF support; and (2) to determine the overall response rate and median survival of patients entered on this study. Methods: Ifosfamide (1.5 g/m²) and irinotecan (60 mg/m²) were administered at fixed doses on days 1–4 and on days 1, 8 and 15, respectively. Cisplatin was given on day 1 at 60 mg/m² and was increased in 10-mg/m² increments. This regimen was repeated every 4 weeks. rhG-CSF (nartograstim) was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 1 μg/kg on days 5–18 except on the day of irinotecan treatment. Results: Between June 1995 and April 1998, 46 patients were registered onto this phase I/II study. The MTD of cisplatin was defined according to toxicity and the dose during three courses was increased. Since at the 80 mg/m² dose level more than one-third of the patients were treated with dose modification, the dose of 70 mg/m² was recommended for phase II study. The dose-limiting toxicity was leukopenia. The overall response rate was 62.2% (95% CI 48.0–76.4%), the median response duration was 144 days, and the median survival time was 393 days. Conclusion: For phase II study, we recommend doses of cisplatin 70 mg/m² on day 1 combined with ifosfamide and irinotecan with rhG-CSF support. Both the response rate and preliminary survival data in this study suggest a high degree of activity of this combination in previously untreated NSCLC. Received: 29 April 1999 / Accepted: 15 September 1999     

Refractory non-small-cell lung cancer responding to combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin

The patient was a 60-year-old female with adenocarcinoma of the lung. An effective radiation therapy was performed for cervical lymph node metastases found 19 months after the operation. A right adrenal metastasis and abdominal paraaortic lymph node metastases were detected 11 months later, and chemotherapy with cisplatin (CDDP) was administered. Although a temporary partial response was obtained, the metastatic lesion was refractory to CDDP. The patient was treated with gemcitabine (GEM) and CDDP, which resulted in near complete response continued for 3 months. The combination therapy of GEM and CDDP may be effective for recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer refractory to other regimens.     

Pharmacokinetic study of gemcitabine, given as prolonged infusion at fixed dose rate, in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Introduction

Although some studies have suggested that gemcitabine delivered as a fixed dose rate (FDR) infusion of 10 mg/m²/min could be more effective than when administered as the standard 30-min infusion, the available pharmacokinetic data are still too limited to draw definitive conclusions. This study is aimed to investigate the plasmatic and intracellular pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine given as FDR at doses of 600 and 1,200 mg/m² in combination with 75 mg/m² of cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

Patients and method

The patients were divided into two groups receiving different initial doses of the drug: 4 patients received 600 mg/m² gemcitabine 60-min i.v. infusion and 4 patients 1,200 mg/m² gemcitabine 120-min i.v. infusion both as a FDR of 10 mg/m²/min on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle (at first cycle). At the second cycle, all patients were treated with gemcitabine at 1,200 mg/m² 120-min i.v. infusion (FDR of 10 mg/m²/min) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. At each cycle, gemcitabine was administered alone on day one, and in combination with 75 mg/m² of cisplatin on day 8. Plasmatic and intracellular pharmacokinetic analyses were performed on blood samples collected at defined time points before, during and after gemcitabine infusion.

Results

The plasmatic pharmacokinetic parameters were clearly different when the patients received a higher gemcitabine dose in the second cycle compared to the lower dose of the first course; in the same time, the intracellular drug levels were not modified. Comparing the pharmacokinetic parameters of different patients treated at different dose levels, the results appeared to be quite similar.

Conclusions

A substantially higher accumulation of metabolites in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was observed when the longer infusion time was employed, suggesting a pharmacological advantage for this treatment schedule.     

A phase I dose escalation study of oral c-MET inhibitor tivantinib (ARQ 197) in combination with gemcitabine in patients with solid tumors

BackgroundTivantinib (ARQ 197) is an orally available, non-adenosine triphosphate competitive, selective c-MET inhibitor. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability and to establish the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of tivantinib and gemcitabine combination.Patients and methodsPatients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors were treated with escalating doses of tivantinib (120–360 mg capsules) in combination with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m² weekly for 3 of 4 weeks). Different schedules of administration were tested and modified based on emerging preclinical data. Tivantinib was given continuously, twice a day (b.i.d.) for 2, 3 or 4 weeks of a 28-day cycle or on a 5-day on, 2-day off schedule (the day before and day of gemcitabine administration).ResultsTwenty-nine patients were treated with gemcitabine and escalating doses of tivantinib: 120 mg b.i.d. (n = 4), 240 mg b.i.d. (n = 6) and 360 mg b.i.d. (n = 19). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in escalation. The RP2D was 360 mg b.i.d. daily, and 45 additional patients were enrolled in the expansion cohort. Grade ≥3 treatment-related toxicities were observed in 54 of 74 (73%) patients with the most common being neutropenia (43%), anemia (30%), thrombocytopenia (28%) and fatigue (15%). There was one treatment-related death due to neutropenia. Administration of gemcitabine did not affect tivantinib concentration. Fifty-six patients were assessable for response. Eleven (20%) patients achieved a partial response and 26 (46%) had stable disease (SD), including 15 (27%) who achieved SD for over 4 months. Ten of 37 patients with clinical benefit had prior exposure to gemcitabine.ConclusionThe combination of tivantinib at its monotherapy dose and standard dose gemcitabine was safe and tolerable. Early signs of antitumor activity may warrant further development of this combination in nonsmall-cell lung cancer, ovarian, pancreatic and cholangiocarcinoma.ClinicalTrials.gov IdentifierNCT00874042.     

Phase I study of ifosfamide plus high-dose epirubicin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

 The present phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of epirubicin given in combination with ifosfamide at a dose of 3 g/m², recycled every 4 weeks, in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A total of 18 patients entered the study; they received the following four dose levels of epirubicin (i. v., day 1): 75 (6 patients), 90 (3 patients), 105 (3 patients), and 120 mg/m² (6 patients). The MTD of epirubicin was 120 mg/m², neutropenia being the dose-limiting toxicity. We observed 1/6, 1/3 1/3, and 2/6 partial responses (PRs) at epirubicin dose levels of 75, 90, 104, and 120 mg/m², respectively. A phase II study of epirubicin given at a dose of 120 mg/m² in association with conventional-dose ifosfamide in advanced NSCLC is in order. Received: 27 March 1995 / Accepted: 14 September 1995     

Phase I study of escalating doses of oxaliplatin in combination with fixed dose gemcitabine in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: Oxaliplatin (OHP) is a new platinum antineoplastic, while gemcitabine (GEM) is one of the most active drugs against non-small cell carcinoma (NSCLC). The OHP/GEM combination is interesting because the drugs have different mechanisms of action and toxicity profiles. The primary endpoint of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of OHP/GEM combination in non-small cell carcinoma of the lung. METHODS: Patients with relapsed NSCLC were treated with fixed dose i.v. GEM (1250 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8; followed on day 1 by i.v. OHP over 3 h, starting from 70 mg/m2 with 20 mg/m2 increments, up to 130 mg/m2. We enrolled 19 patients with eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) status 0/1=13/6; male/female=13/6. All had received first-line and four second-line chemotherapy. RESULTS: Four patients dropped out. At dose level 2, one patient died of pulmonary embolism; at level 3, two patients died of disease progression. One patient at level 3, refused to continue treatment after allergic reaction (high fever episode) during infusion of third cycle. Fifteen patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. According to a priori statistical considerations, three patients in each of the first three treatment levels and six in the last level were evaluable. No G3-4 toxicity was observed at levels 1 and 2. G3 neutropenia and anemia occurred in 8% of cycles at level 3. Six patients entered level 4 (OHP 130 mg/m2) with 22 courses delivered: G3-4 neutropenia occurred in 9%, G1-2 thrombocytopenia in 18%; other toxicities were mainly limited to G1-2 flu-like syndrome in about one third of patients and G1-2 nausea and vomiting in 5% of courses. There was no myelo-DLT at the highest dose level. There was no neurotoxicity at any level. Treatment was delayed in 12% and dose reduced in 26% of courses. There were 2/15 PR. CONCLUSIONS: MTD was not reached. OHP and GEM can probably be administered safely at 130 and 1250 mg/m2, respectively, as first-line therapy. The schedule is being used in a phase II trial.     

吉西他滨联合顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌临床研究

目的比较晚期非小细胞肺癌采用吉西他滨加顺铂与长春瑞滨加顺铂化疗的疗效、生存期和毒副作用.方法 60例晚期非小细胞肺癌患者随机分为两组,A组30例,采用吉西他滨加顺铂;B组30例,采用长春瑞滨加顺铂,进行疗效分析和毒副作用比较.结果 A组CR 3例,PR 15例,总有效率60.0%,1年生存率33.3%,中位生存期9.4个月,肿瘤进展时间2～20个月,Karnofsky平均提高15分;B组CR 1例,PR 13例,总有效率46.7%,1年生存率16.7%,中位生存期6.4个月,肿瘤进展时间3～16个月,Karnofsky平均提高10分,两组间总有效率、1年生存率差异有显著性(P<0.05).最常见的毒副反应为骨髓抑制,A组为血小板减少,B组为白细胞减少.结论吉西他滨加顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效明确,耐受性好.     

Phase II study of docetaxel and gemcitabine combination chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer patients failing previous chemotherapy

We conducted a phase II study of docetaxel and gemcitabine chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had not responded to previous chemotherapy, to assess the response to and toxicity of this combination chemotherapy. Thirty-six patients were enrolled from June 1999 to December 1999. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. One hundred forty-six cycles of treatment were given, with a median of four cycles (range, 1-8 cycles). All patients were evaluable for toxicity profile and response rate. The major toxicity was myelosuppression. Grade III or IV neutropenia occurred in 9 patients (25%) during treatment. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 2 patients (5.6%). Grade III or IV thrombocytopenia occurred in 6 patients (16.7%). Reversible fluid retention occurred in 9 patients (25%). Grade IV pulmonary toxicity (interstitial pneumonitis) occurred in two patients, and both died. Other toxicities were few and mild in severity. After two cycles of treatment, 13 patients (36.1%) had a partial response (95% CI 20.3-51.9%). There was no significant difference in the response rate among patients who had responded to previous chemotherapy or not. The median time to disease progression was 3.8 months, and the median survival was 6.9 months. Median survival was 7.1 and 4.9 months in patients receiving docetaxel and gemcitabine as second-line and greater than or equal to third-line chemotherapy, respectively. In conclusion, docetaxel and gemcitabine salvage chemotherapy produces a high response rate and a relatively mild toxicity profile in NSCLC. However, the issue of interstitial pneumonitis should be of concern.     

Phase I study of flavopiridol in combination with Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of escalating doses of flavopiridol/ paclitaxel/carboplatin in patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as well as the pharmacokinetics and activity of flavopiridol when used in combination with paclitaxel/carboplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients aged 18-75 years with previously untreated stage IIIB/IV NSCLC received paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 over 3 hours followed by carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 5 over 1 hour and flavopiridol 30-85 mg/m2 over 24 hours every 3 weeks for 3 cycles. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were enrolled at 4 sites in the United States and received flavopiridol 30 mg/m2 (n = 3), 50 mg/m2 (n = 6), 70 mg/m2 (n = 3), or 85 mg/m2 (n = 6). No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred at the 50-mg/m2 or 70-mg/m2 dose levels. Two patients treated at the 85-mg/m2 dose level experienced cardiovascular events that did not meet the criteria for DLT but were fatal in 1 case, prompting no further flavopiridol dose escalations and establishment of 70 mg/m2 as the maximum tolerated dose. The most frequently reported adverse events across all dose levels combined were nausea (89%), asthenia (67%), and diarrhea (56%). Flavopiridol concentrations increased rapidly, reached a plateau, and showed a multiphasic decline after the 24-hour infusion. Of 12 patients evaluable for efficacy, 8 achieved a partial response, and 4 had stable disease. CONCLUSION: Flavopiridol in doses 相似文献   

Phase I study of daily times five topotecan and single injection of cisplatin in patients with previously untreated non-small-cell lung carcinoma

Background: The objectives were to determine the dose-limiting toxicity of topotecan in combination with cisplatin, to describe the principal toxicities, and to define the maximally-tolerated doses of the drugs in previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma.Patients and methods: The study was designed to evaluate escalated doses of topotecan (starting at 0.75 mg/m²/day) as a 30-minute infusion daily for five consecutive days with a fixed clinically-relevant dose of 75 mg/m² cisplatin given on day 1, every three weeks.Results: Fifteen chemotherapy-naïve patients entered the study and 14 were evaluable for toxicity. All 11 patients treated at the first topotecan/cisplatin dose level of 0.75/75 mg/m², experienced at least one episode of grade 4 neutropenia. For six patients, absolute neutrophil counts were below 500/ml for more than five days, and two of them developed a grade 4 thrombocytopenia. At the next higher topotecan/cisplatin dose level (1.0/75 mg/m²), grade 4 neutropenia lasting longer than five days occurred in all three evaluable patients, including one patient who expired due to a severe neutropenia associated with sepsis. Non-hematologic toxicities, predominantly nausea and vomiting, were mild to moderate in severity and manageable. Four patients had partial responses (30.7%; 95% confidence interval (9%–61%) of relatively short duration.Conclusion: Both severe neutropenia and thrombocytopenia precluded dose escalation of topotecan and cisplatin administered on this schedule. In previously untreated patients, the first topotecan/cisplatin dose level (0.75/75 mg/m²), was associated with intolerable myelosuppression, and, therefore, the dose levels evaluated in this study cannot be recommended for subsequent phase II investigations. The high toxicity of this schedule and the recent understanding of the pharmacokinetic interaction between those drugs may encourage the investigation of the alternate sequence of cisplatin after TPT in phase II studies.     

Phase II study of gemcitabine and carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine in combination with carboplatin at standard rate or fixed dose rate infusion in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and methods In this prospective study, patients with chemonaive advanced NSCLC were randomized to receive gemcitabine at a standard rate (gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m² over 30 min, the standard arm) or a fixed dose rate (gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m² over 120 min, the FDR arm) on days 1 and 8 every 3 week cycle. In both treatment arms, carboplatin at AUC of 5 was administered over 4 h following gemcitabine on day 1 of each cycle. Results From November 2003 to June 2005, a total of 42 patients, in which 7 (17%) patients had stage III_B disease and 35 (83%) had stage IV disease, were enrolled into this study. All patients were included in efficacy and toxicity assessment. No patient had a complete response. Seven (33%) patients in the standard arm and 10 (48%) in the FDR arm had a partial response. The median time to progression and median overall survival time in the standard arm was 5.4 months (95% CI, 3.8–7 months) and 11.5 months (95% CI, 8.2–14.8 months), respectively, while in the FDR arm was 6.5 (95% CI, 4.4–8.6 months) months, 12.0 months (95% CI, 11.3–12.7 months), respectively. The most frequently reported grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicities were thrombocytopenia (38% patients in the standard arm and 43% in the FDR arm) and neutropenia (24% in the standard arm and 33% in the FDR arm). Although hematological toxicity occurred in a little higher percent of patients in the FDR arm than in the standard arm, there were no discernible differences by statistical analysis in both treatment arms (P > 0.05). And significant nonhematologic toxicities were infrequent and tolerable in both arms. No significant difference existed also (P > 0.05). Conclusion In this phase II study, gemcitabine in combination with carboplatin either at standard rate or fixed dose rate infusion was clinically effective and well tolerated in patients with advanced NSCLC.