Relationship between fatigue and nutritional status in patients receiving radiation therapy to treat lung cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To describe the relationship between fatigue and nutritional status in patients receiving radiation therapy for lung cancer. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Radiation therapy department of a large mid-western cancer center. SAMPLE: 45 adults with primary cancer of the lung receiving outpatient primary or adjuvant radiation therapy. METHODS: Measurements taken before radiation therapy, at week four of treatment, and at completion included the Piper Fatigue Scale, prealbumin levels, and weights. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLE: Fatigue, nutritional status. FINDINGS: Weight loss over the course of treatment was significant but did not correlate with fatigue; fatigue did not change significantly during the measurement period. CONCLUSIONS: Fatigue and nutrition are major problems for patients with lung cancer, but nutritional changes do not correlate with fatigue. An increase in fatigue during radiation therapy was not identified. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Nurses should continue efforts to intervene with the problems of nutrition and fatigue. The study should be repeated using different fatigue Instruments and with other cancer populations.     

Treatment of radiotherapy-induced fatigue through a nonpharmacological approach

BACKGROUND: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a frequently occurring, burdensome side effect of radiation therapy that can result in detrimental effects to health-related quality of life (HRQL). The findings from a pilot study examining the efficacy of the complementary and alternative practice of Polarity Therapy (PT) in reducing CRF and improving HRQL are reported. METHODS: Fifteen women undergoing radiation therapy for breast cancer and experiencing fatigue were randomized to receive 1, 2, or no PT treatments. Treatments were given 1 week apart to the patients receiving 2 treatments. Fatigue and HRQL were assessed at baseline prior to PT, 3 days following the first PT treatment (week 1), and 3 days following the second PT treatment (week 2). RESULTS: There was a statistically significant improvement in both CRF and HRQL in the 10 patients who received a PT treatment compared to the 5 control patients at the week 1 assessment. In addition, there was a statistically significant difference among the 3 treatment groups in improvement in CRF at the week 2 assessment. This finding, coupled with a visual inspection of the means, supports the plausibility of a dose response concerning PT. CONCLUSION: Results from this pilot investigation suggest that PT may have a positive influence on CRF and HRQL in women undergoing radiation treatment for breast cancer. Randomized, controlled clinical trials with larger sample sizes are needed.     

Cancer-related fatigue: prevalence of proposed diagnostic criteria in a United States sample of cancer survivors.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the proposed cancer-related fatigue (CRF) diagnostic criteria in a sample of cancer survivors. More accurate prevalence estimates of CRF may result in improved diagnosis and management of one of the most common symptoms associated with cancer and its treatment. METHODS: Three hundred seventy-nine individuals who had been treated with chemotherapy, either alone or in combination with radiation therapy, were surveyed. Patients were asked background questions about their current condition, their medical history, and the frequency of fatigue during their chemotherapy. Additionally, patients who reported experiencing fatigue at least a few days each month during treatment were asked a series of questions about the impact of fatigue on their daily functioning. RESULTS: One hundred forty-one (37%) individuals reported at least 2 weeks of fatigue in the previous month. Of the respondents who had received their last treatment more than 5 years ago, 33% still reported at least a 2-week period of fatigue in the month before the interview. Evaluation of the proposed criteria revealed that 17% of respondents met at least two criteria for CRF. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of diagnosable CRF in the individuals in this sample, most of whom had completed treatment more than 1 year ago, was 17%-lower than expected based on previous reports that have used less-strict criteria. In a sizable number of people, CRF persists well beyond active treatment and should be a focus of intervention. Although they will require replication in other samples and clinical validation, these formal diagnostic criteria can be a step toward common language and a better understanding of the severity range and persistence of CRF.     

Is"chemobrain" a transient state? A prospective pilot study among persons with non-small cell lung cancer

In patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), chemotherapy combined with radiation therapy modestly improves survival when compared with radiotherapy alone. In light of the small survival benefit,there is a need to quantify any potential loss of neurocognitive function that may result from chemotherapy in this patient population. The current study examines cognitive functioning in 14 stage III NSCLC patients who received treatment with cisplatin/etoposide/radiotherapy. Patients were assessed before receiving chemotherapy and at 1 and 7 months after treatment. At each time point, participants were administered a comprehensive battery of psychological and neuropsychological tests. In all, 71% of patients demonstrated cognitive impairment prior to any treatment. One month post chemotherapy, the majority of patients (62%) experienced cognitive decline; however, these negative effects apparently dissipated by 7 months post treatment, suggesting that the untoward effects of chemotherapy in these specific patients given this chemotherapy regimen may have been transitory. Cognitive decline did not appear to be associated with age, mood, fatigue, or quality-of-life measures. These findings demonstrated the importance of employing both a pre- and extended post-treatment assessment in chemotherapy research.     

Cancer-related fatigue: the scale of the problem

Fatigue is one of the most common and debilitating symptoms experienced by patients with cancer. Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is characterized by feelings of tiredness, weakness, and lack of energy, and is distinct from the "normal" drowsiness experienced by healthy individuals in that it is not relieved by rest or sleep. It occurs both as a consequence of the cancer itself and as a side effect of cancer treatment, although the precise underlying pathophysiology is largely unknown. CRF may be an early symptom of malignant disease and is reported by as many as 40% of patients at diagnosis. Virtually all patients expect fatigue from cancer therapy. Up to 90% of patients treated with radiation and up to 80% of those treated with chemotherapy experience fatigue. CRF continues for months and even years ollowing completion of treatment in approximately one third of the patients with cancer. The impact of CRF on a patient's quality of life (QoL), particularly in relation to physical functioning and the ability to perform activities of daily living, is both profound and pervasive. In addition, CRF is associated with considerable psychological distress and can impose a significant financial burden by limiting a patient's ability to work. These effects can extend to caregivers and family members, who may also have to reduce their working capacity in order to provide additional care for a patient with CRF. This paper examines the prevalence of CRF and explores the impact of this distressing symptom on patients' functioning and QoL. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.     

Investigation of the comparative toxicity of 5-FU bolus versus 5-FU continuous infusion circadian chemotherapy with concurrent radiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE: To compare the relative toxicities of bolus versus infusional 5-FU chemotherapy administrated concurrently during external beam irradiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer following surgical extirpation. METHODS: A total of 26 eligible patients were retrospectively identified as having been treated for rectal adenocarcinoma at the Stratton VAMC between 1989 and 1997. A comparative analysis of treatment dose intensities, treatment delays and toxicities in these patients was performed. RESULTS: Significantly less WBC toxicity was observed in the patients receiving infusional 5-FU chemotherapy. The other toxicities, with the exception of skin toxicity, were generally less frequent in the 5-FU infusional group. When the toxicities were corrected for 5-FU dose intensity, to yield toxicity per mg of 5-FU, statistically significant differences were found for hematological toxicity (WBC and platelets), and for gastrointestinal toxicity (frequency and severity of diarrhea and weight loss). The majority of patients receiving infusional 5-FU therapy were treated using a circadian pattern of treatment peaking around the time of the radiation therapy. Patients receiving infusional 5-FU were able to tolerate over twice the dose intensity as those receiving bolus administration. Local recurrence rate in all patients was 3.8% comparing favorably to other reported studies. Distant recurrence frequency was also acceptable at 34.6% for the group. CONCLUSION: Infusional 5-FU chemotherapy compared with bolus therapy during pelvic radiation minimizes toxicity to the patient while maximizing the dose of 5-FU that can be delivered. As infusional 5-FU therapy during radiation has previously been shown to increase disease free duration and survival, infusional 5-FU should be considered as an acceptable standard of care to prevent local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma following its resection. Shaping this infusional 5-FU chemotherapy within the day so that most of the daily dose is delivered around the time of the radiation therapy may further modify the toxic therapeutic ratio of combined modality therapy.     

Clinical factors associated with fatigue over time in paediatric oncology patients receiving chemotherapy

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships between clinical factors (including haemoglobin value, chemotherapeutic agents, and corticosteroid use) and changing patterns of fatigue before and for the next 10 days following the start of a new round of chemotherapy in children with cancer. A prospective longitudinal design was used to collect data from 48 paediatric oncology patients who were about to begin a new round of chemotherapy and their parents. Fatigue levels were assessed using multidomain questionnaires with three categories of patient self-report (including 'General Fatigue', 'Sleep/Rest Fatigue', and 'Cognitive Fatigue') and four categories of parent proxy-report (including 'Lack of Energy', 'Unable to Function', 'Altered Sleep', and 'Altered Mood'). The findings suggest that fatigue from both patient self-report and parent proxy-report changed significantly over time. The major findings from this study are that patients have more problems with fatigue in the first few days after the start of a cycle of chemotherapy. Corticosteroid use and haemoglobin value were associated with significant increases in fatigue that were sustained for several days and reached the highest level of fatigue at day 5 for those receiving concurrent steroids. The association of chemotherapeutic agents with fatigue varied between patient self-report and parent report, but the type of chemotherapeutic agents used was not associated with most changes in fatigue.     

The experience of fatigue and other symptoms in patients receiving chemotherapy

Fatigue has been recognized as the most frequently reported symptom of cancer and cancer therapy. There is a lack of research on such aspects as the pattern of fatigue which accompanies treatment, its exacerbating and relieving factors, the different mechanisms of fatigue and its relationship with the factors purported to be related to the fatigue experience. It has been suggested that cancer patients may be those best placed to reveal the likely causes of fatigue. As part of a larger study examining the pattern of fatigue in cancer patients who were undergoing a course of chemotherapy treatment, patients’perceptions of fatigue and tiredness and the nature, pattern and causes of fatigue in relation to cancer and its treatment were obtained. In addition to a diary, interviews were conducted at two time points, at the beginning and end of a cycle of chemotherapy, with over 100 cancer patients. Just under 90% of the sample reported fatigue at some point during a cycle of chemotherapy. The majority of the sample did not consider tiredness and fatigue to constitute the same feelings. Subjects attributed their fatigue to a combination of factors but most frequently mentioned treatment, changes in sleep patterns and other symptoms. Implications for practice and research are outlined.     

Impact of partial versus whole breast radiation therapy on fatigue, perceived stress, quality of life and natural killer cell activity in women with breast cancer

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: This pilot study used a prospective longitudinal design to compare the effect of adjuvant whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT) versus partial breast radiation therapy (PBRT) on fatigue, perceived stress, quality of life and natural killer cell activity (NKCA) in women receiving radiation after breast cancer surgery. METHODS: Women (N = 30) with early-stage breast cancer received either PBRT, Mammosite brachytherapy at dose of 34 Gy 10 fractions/5 days, (N = 15) or WBRT, 3-D conformal techniques at dose of 50 Gy +10 Gy Boost/30 fractions, (N = 15). Treatment was determined by the attending oncologist after discussion with the patient and the choice was based on tumor stage and clinical need. Women were assessed prior to initiation of radiation therapy and twice after completion of radiation therapy. At each assessment, blood was obtained for determination of NKCA and the following instruments were administered: Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F), and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) was used to evaluate group differences in initial outcomes and change in outcomes over time. RESULTS: Fatigue (FACT-F) levels, which were similar prior to radiation therapy, demonstrated a significant difference in trajectory. Women who received PBRT reported progressively lower fatigue; conversely fatigue worsened over time for women who received WBRT. No difference in perceived stress was observed between women who received PBRT or WBRT. Both groups of women reported similar levels of quality of life (FACT-G) prior to initiation of radiation therapy. However, HLM analysis revealed significant group differences in the trajectory of quality of life, such that women receiving PBRT exhibited a linear increase in quality of life over time after completion of radiation therapy; whereas women receiving WBRT showed a decreasing trajectory. NKCA was also similar between therapy groups but additional post hoc analysis revealed that better quality of life significantly predicted higher NKCA regardless of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to WBRT, PBRT results in more rapid recovery from cancer-related fatigue with improved restoration of quality of life after radiation therapy. Additionally, better quality of life predicts higher NKCA against tumor targets, emphasizing the importance of fostering quality of life for women undergoing adjuvant radiation therapy.     

Randomised phase 2 trial of SIR-Spheres plus fluorouracil/leucovorin chemotherapy versus fluorouracil/leucovorin chemotherapy alone in advanced colorectal cancer

PURPOSE: Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) with SIR-Spheres(R) is a new technique for selectively targeting high doses of radiation to tumours within the liver. The primary objectives of this randomised trial were to compare the response rate, time to progressive disease (PD), and toxicity of a regimen of systemic fluorouracil/leucovorin chemotherapy versus the same chemotherapy plus a single administration of SIR-Spheres in patients with advanced colorectal liver metastases. The trial was designed to presage a larger trial that would have survival as the primary outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with previously untreated advanced colorectal liver metastases, with or without extrahepatic metastases, were randomised into the study. RESULTS: Using RECIST criteria, the response rate for 11 patients receiving the combination treatment was significantly greater than for 10 patients receiving chemotherapy alone (First Integrated Response; 10 PR, 1 SD vs. 0 PR, 6 SD, 4 PD, P < 0.001 and Best Confirmed Response; 8 PR, 3 SD vs. 0 PR, 6 SD, 4 PD P < 0.001). The time to PD was greater for patients receiving the combination treatment (18.6 months vs. 3.6 months, P < 0.0005). Median survival was significantly longer for patients receiving the combination treatment (29.4 months vs. 12.8 months, P = 0.02). One patient in the combination arm died from chemotherapy induced neutropenic sepsis after the fourth chemotherapy cycle. There were more Grade 3 and 4 toxicity events in patients receiving the combination treatment. There was no difference in quality-of-life over a 3 month period between the two treatments when rated by patients (P = 0.96) or physicians (P = 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: This small phase 2 randomised trial demonstrated that the addition of a single administration of SIR-Spheres to a regimen of systemic fluorouracil/leucovorin chemotherapy significantly increased both treatment related response, time to PD, and survival with acceptable toxicity. The combination of SIR-Spheres plus systemic chemotherapy is now the subject of ongoing trials to further define patient benefit.     

Stimulation of the immunological reactivity of cancer patients by Eleutherococcus extract

In vitro treatment of lymphocytes with eleutherococcal preparation produced an immune-boosting effect both in cancer patients and healthy controls. The results of a randomized study pointed to eleutherococcus' capability of stimulating general non-specific resistance and immunologic vigor in the course of cytostatic and radiation treatment for breast cancer. Since eleutherococcus is free of toxicity and allergenicity in prolonged treatment, it is indicated in patients receiving intensive antitumor therapy. Drug concentration should be tailored individually.     

Cancer-related fatigue: A critical appraisal

This aim of this systematic review was to determine the prevalence and pattern of cancer-related fatigue (CRF), and identify factors associated with its development. Relevant literature was identified through an electronic database search using specified keywords. Included studies investigated CRF in adult cancer patients using a multidimensional fatigue measure. The methodological quality was assessed using six published standards. CRF is apparent both during and after anti-cancer therapy, however, the prevalence of CRF varied between studies. The variables associated with the development and persistence of CRF remain to be identified. Inconsistencies were evident in the pattern of CRF and its associated factors. This is likely to have arisen from the inherent difficulties in the measurement of a subjective sensation, further complicated by the myriad of outcome measures used. More methodologically sound research; assessing CRF from the commencement of therapy, considering all pertinent variables is needed.     

分子靶向药物给药模式对转移性结直肠癌患者生存的影响

目的 探讨两种不同类型靶向药物在不同给药模式下对转移性结直肠癌（mCRC）患者生存的影响。方法 回顾性分析135例接受过分子靶向治疗mCRC患者的临床病理特征、靶向治疗情况及随访资料,比较不同种类靶向药物及不同线数化疗联合靶向治疗对生存期（OS）的影响。结果 全组中接受抗EGFR单抗者、接受贝伐珠单抗者及接受抗EGFR单抗+贝伐珠单抗者的中位OS依次为20.7、24.4和41.6个月,接受两种靶向药物者比仅接受一种靶向药物者的中位OS有明显延长（P＜0.05）;一线化疗未联合靶向治疗者的中位OS为30.8个月,与一线化疗联合靶向治疗者的21.5个月相比,差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）;三线及以上联合靶向治疗者的中位OS为37.0个月,高于三线前均联合靶向治疗者的137个月,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）;接受过三种化疗药物（伊立替康、奥沙利铂、氟尿嘧啶）及贝伐珠单抗和抗EGFR单抗两种靶向药物的患者中,三线及以上使用靶向者的中位OS为50.6个月,与三线前使用靶向者的41.6个月比较,差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 接受过两类靶向药物治疗的mCRC患者比仅接受一类靶向药物者可能获得更好生存获益。患者使用靶向药物的时机并非越早越好,肿瘤生物学行为较好的患者更适合先化疗后靶向的治疗模式。     

A case for preplanned thoracic and prophylactic whole brain radiation therapy in limited small-cell lung cancer

Thirty patients with previously untreated limited small-cell lung cancer were treated in a prospectively randomized trial comparing chemotherapy versus chemotherapy plus prophylactic whole brain radiation therapy. Without preplanned thoracic radiation therapy in addition to the chemotherapy, 78% of patients failed in the lung (52% in the lung solely) as the first site of treatment failure. In those patients not receiving prophylactic whole brain irradiation, 73% failed in the CNS at the time of first and second failure versus 13% of the group randomized to prophylactic whole brain radiation therapy (and those two before the radiation was given). A strong case can be made for the use of both preplanned thoracic and prophylactic whole brain radiation therapy in conjunction with combination chemotherapy, at least until much more effective chemotherapy is found.