与术后CT比较评估术中运用C型臂X线机透视对34例腰椎侧凸的椎弓根固定的置钉情况

目的 探索一种有效方法来识别术中C型臂X线机监测腰椎侧凸椎弓根螺钉的误置.方法 在34例腰椎侧凸畸形的患者中共植入264枚椎弓根螺钉,所有病例手术后均接受CT检查,相比较后总结出3项X线标准可判断术中螺钉的置入位置.结果 比较术后CT和术中X线透视结果发现有7枚螺钉穿破椎弓根内壁.9枚螺钉穿破椎弓根外壁.结论 腰椎侧凸的手术中采用3项X线透视监测标准可有效识别椎弓根螺钉可能发生的误置,并对其及时进行位置修正.     

透视下分步引导上中胸椎椎弓根螺钉安全植入实验研究

目的：探索C形臂X线监测引导上中胸椎椎弓根螺钉植入的的方法,并评定其准确性与安全性。方法：①取6具正常成人T1-T8脊椎骨架标本,分解出单个椎体,导针沿椎弓根轴线进针,分别于进针点、针前端位于椎弓根中部、椎体后缘及椎体前缘皮质下,通过C形臂X线透视,记录、分析椎弓根轴线导针在进针点及不同进针深度时在正侧位透视图像上导针前端的位置,以及相关位置对应关系变化规律。②按上述椎弓根轴线导针C形臂X线透视监测对应位置变化规律,作为C形臂X线透视下分步引导上中胸椎椎弓根螺钉安全植入的方法。取6具T1-T8脊柱标本,C形臂X线机引导下分步植入椎弓根螺钉96枚,然后将脊椎标本作CT扫描,判定椎弓根螺钉位置。结果：根据CT扫描结果,优（椎弓根螺钉安全位于椎弓根内者）90枚,可（螺钉穿破椎弓根内或外侧骨皮质较少,突破在2mm以内者）6枚,差（螺钉穿破椎弓根内外骨皮质较多,突破在2mm以上）0枚。结论：C形臂X线透视下分步引导上中胸椎椎弓根螺钉植入,是一种能提高上中胸椎椎弓根螺钉植入的简单经济、确实可行的方法。     

胸腰椎椎弓根螺钉误置的原因分析及对策

目的 探讨胸腰椎椎弓根螺钉误置的原因及对策。方法 1996-2002年对293例脊柱疾病患者施行椎弓根螺钉内固定术发生的螺钉误置情况进行回顾性总结，分析。结果 293例共置入椎弓根螺钉1256枚，螺钉植入节段错误7例，占2.38%；上胸椎（T2-7）置钉113枚，有11枚螺钉穿破椎弓根皮质，占9.74%；下胸椎（T8-12）置钉261枚，有9枚螺钉穿破椎弓根皮质，占3.45%；腰骶椎置钉882枚，有16枚穿破椎弓根皮质，占1.81%，共计36枚螺钉，占2.87%；螺钉角异常65枚，占5.81%。结论 椎弓根螺钉误置与操作技术，解剖学变异及脊柱病损因素密切相关；良好的手术技巧，术前影像资料的认真观测及术中必要的影像监控是准确置钉的关键。     

多层螺旋CT三维重建技术在胸腰椎骨折经椎弓根螺钉内固定术中的应用价值

目的:探讨多层螺旋CT(MSCT)三维重建技术在胸腰椎骨折患者经椎弓根螺钉内固定术中的应用价值。方法:2007年1月~2008年12月,78例胸腰椎骨折患者在我院行椎弓根螺钉内固定术,其中38例使用传统置钉法(Weinstein法或AO法)进行椎弓根螺钉置入(A组),40例采用MSCT三维重建设计钉道的置钉方法进行螺钉置入(B组),术后两组均复查胸腰椎正、侧位X线片和CT了解置入螺钉位置情况,应用Lonstein等的方法评判置钉准确率。结果:78例患者共置入椎弓根螺钉436枚,A组38例共置入212枚,12例32枚螺钉穿破椎弓根皮质,其中穿破椎弓根内外皮质21枚,穿破椎弓根上下皮质11枚,置钉准确率84.91%;B组40例共置入224枚,5例6枚螺钉穿破椎弓根皮质,其中穿破椎弓根内外皮质4枚,穿破椎弓根上下皮质2枚,置钉准确率97.33%。两组置钉准确率有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论:胸腰椎骨折患者行椎弓根螺钉内固定时应用MSCT三维重建设计钉道的置钉方法较传统置钉方法成功率高。     

3种椎弓根螺钉植入法的对比实验研究

目的探讨椎弓根螺钉水平面植入的最佳方法。方法选用15具胸腰椎脊柱标本（T11～L5），随机分三组，分别模拟Roy—Camille、Magerl和节段性差异法先后植入直径5mm、6mm、7mm椎弓根螺钉，观测进钉点和进钉方向与椎弓根中心轴吻合情况、螺钉穿破椎弓根情况和位于椎体内的最大长度。结果Roy—Camille法进钉点多偏椎弓根中心轴内侧，进钉方向与大多数椎弓根E角吻合较差；Magerl法进钉点与腰椎椎弓根中心轴吻合较好，但进钉点方向与E角仍存在差异；节段性差异法与椎弓根中心轴吻合最好。Roy—Camille法螺钉位于椎体内相对较少，Magerl和节段性差异法螺钉位于椎体内较多。植入5mm螺钉时，3种方法的穿破量均极少，植入6mm和7mm螺钉时，穿破量和穿破率相应增加，三者中Roy—Camille法穿破率较高，节段性差异法较低。在胸腰椎交界处无论何种进钉法，使用6mm或7mm时螺钉均有不同程度椎弓根穿破，而在下腰椎使用7mm螺钉的穿破量仍极少或无。结论根据不同节段选用不同直径螺钉、不同进钉点位置和不同进钉方向植入螺钉，节段性差异法植入效果最佳。     

IsoC-3D实时定位导航系统引导植入腰椎椎弓根螺钉34例

目的:探讨IsoC-3D实时定位导航系统在腰椎椎弓根螺钉植入手术过程中的应用.方法:对腰椎滑脱、腰椎失稳、脊柱侧弯、腰椎骨折共34例在IsoC-3D实时定位导航系统引导下完成椎弓根螺钉的植入,共植入椎弓根螺钉132枚,术后进行X线平片及CT扫描掌握螺钉的方向和位置.结果:132枚椎弓根螺钉均未穿破椎弓根,椎弓根螺钉的方向、深度、位置均相当理想,全部病例无硬膜、神经根损伤.结论:IsoC-3D实时定位导航系统可以准确引导腰椎椎弓根螺钉的植入,避免椎弓根螺钉植入相关的并发症.     

对称性可调节式椎弓根钻孔导向器的研制及应用

目的：研制一种椎弓根钉钻孔导向器供术中使用，提高椎弓根螺钉置入的成功率及置入质量。方法：根据术前CT及X线片测定的水平面椎弓根钉置入角(TSA)、矢状而椎弓根钉置入角(SSA)及进钉点间距的数据，应用该钠孔导向器引导术中椎弓根螺钉钻孔操作。临床应用于21例胸腰椎骨折及腰椎滑脱患者，置入椎弓根钉84枚。结果：术后CT及X线片显示全部椎弓根钉置入位置准确，两侧椎弓根螺钉对称，具有相同或相近的SSA及TSA。结论：该钻孔导向器设计合理，使用方便，能提高椎弓根螺钉置入的准确性，可提高固定钉的安置质量。     

机器人辅助与徒手置钉在腰椎翻修术早期结果比较

[目的]比较Renaissance机器人系统辅助椎弓根螺钉置入与徒手椎弓根螺钉置入在腰椎翻修手术中的安全性及准确性。[方法]回顾性分析2018年1月~2018年12月在本院行腰椎后路翻修手术的病例69例,其中使用Renaissance机器人系统辅助椎弓根螺钉置入共31例,使用传统徒手椎弓根螺钉置入38例。记录临床资料,并根据术后CT对螺钉精度进行Gertzbein Robbins分级,比较螺钉置入准确性。[结果]两组患者手术时间、术后出血量及手术相关并发症等差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。机器人组术中出血量、术中透视次数显著少于徒手组(P0.05)。机器人辅助组共置入螺钉152枚,术后CT评估显示:A级置钉137枚,B级置钉11枚,C级置钉4枚,没有D、E级置钉,置钉准确率97.37%。徒手组共置入螺钉194枚,术后CT评估显示:A级置钉129枚,B级置钉48枚,C级置钉15枚,D级置钉2枚,没有发现E级置钉,置钉准确率91.24%。在螺钉精度分级及螺钉准确性方面,机器人组优于徒手组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。[结论]与徒手置钉技术相比,Renaissance机器人系统辅助椎弓根螺钉置入在腰椎翻修手术中具有置钉精度高、且术中出血及术中透视次数少的优势。     

颈椎椎弓根螺钉徒手植入技术的临床研究

目的 评价颈椎椎弓根螺钉徒手植入技术（无须术中影像技术引导）的安全性和可靠性。方法应用Axis内固定系统（美国枢法模公司）对36例颈椎疾病患者进行颈后路经椎弓根内固定术,共植入螺钉144枚,方法如下：①术中清晰地显露颈椎侧块和突间关节,用直径3,0mm高速球形磨钻去除侧块外上象限处骨皮质,然后用2．0mm的自制手锥沿椎弓根事先确定的方向轻轻钻入,若遇阻力则需略改变方向,使其自然置入,深约2～2,5cm。确定无误后,则安置Axis钛板和置入长度合适的椎弓根螺钉。②安装完毕后,即用C型臂X线机作双斜位透视,无误后关闭切口。结果从G～G,共植入根弓根螺钉144枚,其中10枚（6．8％）钉初次置入后感觉松动,经校正后二次置入成功,11枚（3．5％）钉道钻孔后出血较多,但及时处理后出血停止并无不良结果。术后X线斜位片及CT片显示,16枚（11．1％）螺钉穿破椎弓根,其中10枚螺钉（6．9％）穿破椎弓根外侧皮质,4枚（2．8％）穿破椎弓根上侧皮质,2枚（1．3％）穿破椎弓根下侧皮质。随访未发现与螺钉置入穿破椎弓根皮质有关的神经血管损伤问题。结论本研究提示,在事先充分的对每个患者颈椎椎弓根X线及CT解剖结构了解的情况下,徒手置入椎弓根螺钉行颈椎后路内固定安全可行。     

快速成型个体化导航模板辅助胸椎椎弓根螺钉置入可行性研究

[目的]通过尸体标本实验的方法探讨个体化导航模板辅助胸椎椎弓根螺钉置入的准确性及可行性.[方法]对6具胸椎尸体标本进行CT扫描,根据CT扫描资料,利用逆向工程原理及快速成型技术设计制造出个体化导航模板,利用个体化导航模板在尸体标本上辅助置入胸椎椎弓根螺钉,所有螺钉的置入由同一位具有腰椎椎弓根螺钉置钉经验但无胸椎椎弓根螺钉置钉经验的骨科医师进行操作,随后采用大体解剖的方法肉眼观察置钉的准确性;并根据螺钉是否穿破椎弓根、穿出距离及穿破方向进行分级.[结果]共设计制作了72个个体化导航模板辅助置入胸椎椎弓根螺钉144枚,132枚(91.7%)螺钉完全在椎弓根内;12(8.3%)枚螺钉穿破椎弓根,其中2枚螺钉穿破椎弓根内侧壁(穿破距离分别为0.6、0.8 mm),10枚螺钉穿破椎弓根外侧壁(9枚螺钉穿出距离<2 mm,1枚螺钉穿出距离为2.5 mm);没有椎弓根上方、下方及椎体前方穿破的螺钉.所有穿破椎弓根壁的螺钉均在安全可接受的范围内.[结论]快速成型个体化导航模板辅助胸椎椎弓根螺钉置入准确率高,对术者无特别的经验要求,手术操作简单、安全,可避免术中放射性损伤,为胸椎椎弓根螺钉的置入提供了一种新的可行方法,尤其适用于初学者.     

Epidural anesthesia: step by step to success

Besides pain management in obstetric patients epidural anaesthesia plays a major role in the perioperative setting. Especially the technique of thoracic epidural anaesthesia (TEA) provides better postoperative analgesia when compared with systemic pain therapy. TEA is associated with improved outcome in high-risk patients and patients undergoing extensive surgery. An acute pain management service is required to guarantee high effectiveness and a low complication rate. TEA is an important part of a multimodal perioperative concept, especially in fast-track surgery, which means advantages for patients outcome and hospitals economics.     

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation transapical: step by step

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (T-AVI) has been introduced into clinical practice to treat high-risk elderly patients with aortic stenosis. T-AVI can be performed by using a retrograde transfemoral (TF), transsubclavian, transaortic, and/or antegrade transapical (TA) approach. For TA-AVI, CE mark approval was granted in 2008 for the Edwards SAPIEN (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) prosthesis with the Ascendra delivery system and in 2010 for the second-generation Edwards SAPIEN XT prosthesis and the Ascendra II delivery system, with 23-mm and 26-mm valves. In 2011, CE mark approval has been granted for TA-AVI by using the SAPIEN XT 29-mm prosthesis. Several other devices from different companies (Jenavalve, Jena Valve Inc, Munich, Germany; Embracer, Medtronic Inc, Guilford, CT; Accurate, Symetis Inc, Geneva, Switzerland) have passed "first in man trials" successfully and are being evaluated within multicenter pivotal studies. In this article we will focus on specific aspects of the TA technique for AVI.     

Bipolar enucleation of the prostate—step by step

Bipolar enucleation of prostate (BipolEP) is a useful method for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Compared with conventional transurethral resection, the enucleation technique has several advantages. However, since the cost of laser equipment used for enucleation is relatively high, enucleation using bipolar devices has been attempted by many previous surgeons. We consider bipolar enucleation is an effective and safe procedure, and we would like to share our experience of equipment settings and procedures through this article. We will introduce the equipment and settings of BipolEP and then present the actual step-by-step procedures and surgical tips. First, circular incisions are made on bladder neck and mucosa at the level of verumontanum. Then, enucleation is performed in the order of median and lateral lobes as in laser enucleation. Haemostasis should be done throughout the procedure. After enucleation and haemostasis, prostatic tissue is evacuated by morcellator. Currently, there are several types of electrode and morcellator systems. In our experience, BipolEP has a steep learning curve but it is safe and effective procedure for managing BPH. In particular, effective haemostasis is the greatest advantage of BipolEP when compared to traditional TUR or laser enucleation.     

Laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy: a technique illustrated step by step

OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic surgery is expanding among urologists as a minimally invasive treatment and may now be applied to treat neoplasms of the pelvic organs. Laparoscopic cystoprostatectomy has still not been well codified and illustrated. We describe a technique of laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy that we have developed in 10 patients after practicing in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. METHODS: Between June 2001 and July 2002, 10 men with bladder cancer underwent laparoscopic cystoprostatectomy with urinary diversion. This report details step by step our 5-port transperitoneal technique with primary access to the seminal vesicles and Denonvillier's fascia, ureters detection after umbilical arteries incision, endopelvic fascia incision and dorsal vein complex control before division of the vesical and prostatic fibrovascular pedicles with a harmonic scalpel. RESULTS: We performed 6 orthotopic ileal neobladders, 2 sigmoid ureterostomies and 2 cutaneous ureterostomies. In all cases no conversion to open surgery was necessary. The mean time to perform the laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy, including the lymph node dissection, was 166 minutes (range 150-180). Mean estimated blood loss was 310 ml (range 220-440). Mean hospital stay was 8.1 days (range 7-9) for ileal orthotopic neobladder, 8 days (range 7-9) for sigmoid ureterostomy and 5 days for cutaneous ureterostomy. The mean follow up is 12.3 months (range 5-18). Two patients respectively with stage T2bN0 G2-3 and stage pT1N0 (plus carcinoma in situ) G3 transitional cell carcinoma and surgical margins tumor free had diffusive metastatic disease after 6 months. The other 8 patients are free from disease. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic radical cystectomy is still an operation for pioneers but this procedure may be not strictly relegated to a few academic centers. In our opinion laparoscopic cystoprostatectomy is a feasible, fast, safe and easy procedure and urinary diversion may be performed with a laparoscopic, open or combined approach without reducing the advantages of laparoscopy.