Peripheral blood progenitor cell grafts contain high levels of platelet-secreted mediators

BACKGROUND: The cytokine network in peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) grafts may affect hematopoietic reconstitution or the risk of postransplant relapse of malignant disorders through effects on normal progenitor cells or contaminating malignant cells. Whether thrombopoietin (TPO), SCF, and platelet-secreted mediators are parts of this network was investigated. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Peripheral blood and PBPC plasma samples were collected consecutively from patients with malignant disorders who underwent PBPC harvest. Blood samples were collected immediately before and after apheresis. Patients underwent mobilization by chemotherapy plus G-CSF, except for one patient who received only G-CSF. Plasma levels were also determined for healthy controls. RESULTS: PBPC grafts had greater levels of platelet-secreted platelet factor 4 (PF4), beta-thromboglobulin, and platelet-derived growth factor isoform AB, as compared with venous levels in patients and controls. Although platelet and PF4 levels in autografts were significantly correlated, the graft:blood ratio was higher for PF4 than for platelets. In both the patients' blood and the autografts, TPO levels were increased from the levels in normal controls. Blood and graft levels of SCF were within the normal range. CONCLUSION: The cytokine network of PBPC autografts includes increased levels of TPO and several platelet-derived mediators.     

Peripheral blood progenitor cell collection after epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cisplatin combination chemotherapy using EPO-based cytokine regimens: a randomized comparison of G-CSF and sequential GM-/G-CSF

BACKGROUND: The peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization capacity of EPO in association with either G-CSF or sequential GM-CSF/G-CSF was compared in a randomized fashion after epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cisplatin (ETP) chemotherapy. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Forty patients with stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV ovarian carcinoma were enrolled in this randomized comparison of mobilizing capacity and myelopoietic effects of G-CSF + EPO and GM-/G-CSF + EPO following the first ETP chemotherapy treatment. After ETP chemotherapy (Day 1), 20 patients received G-CSF 5 microg per kg per day from Day 2 to Day 13 and 20 patients received GM-CSF 5 microg per kg per day from Day 2 to Day 6 followed by G-CSF 5 microg per kg per day from Day 7 to Day 13. EPO (150 IU per kg) was given every other day from Day 2 to Day 13 to all patients in both arms of the study. Apheresis (two blood volumes) was performed during hematologic recovery. RESULTS: The magnitude of CD34+ cell mobilization and the abrogation of patients' myelosuppression were comparable in both study arms; however, GM-/G-CSF + EPO patients had significantly higher CD34+ yields because of a higher CD34+ cell collection efficiency (57.5% for GM-/G-CSF + EPO and 46.3% for G-CSF + EPO patients; p = 0.0009). Identical doses of PBPCs mobilized by GM-/G-CSF + EPO and G-CSF + EPO drove comparable hematopoietic recovery after reinfusion in patients treated with identical high-dose chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The sequential administration of GM-CSF and G-CSF in combination with EPO is feasible and improves the PBPC collection efficiency after platinum-based intensive polychemotherapy, associating high PBPC mobilization to high collection efficiency during apheresis.     

The dose of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor after chemopriming treatment does not influence apheresis yield of progenitor cells: a retrospective study of 91 cases

BACKGROUND: The optimal dose of post-chemotherapy granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration before peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection has not been determined as yet, although 5 microg per kg per day has been recommended as the standard dose. This study retrospectively analyzed the effect of G-CSF dose on peripheral blood CD34+ cell collection from 91 patients with hematologic malignancies. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Various doses of G-CSF were administered after several chemotherapeutic PBPC mobilization regimens. According to the dose of G-CSF administered, patients were assigned to two groups. Group 1 included 46 patients who received a low dose of G-CSF (median, 3.6 [range, 2.8-4.6] microg/kg/day). Group 2 included 45 patients who received a standard G-CSF dose of 6.0 (5.5-8. 1) microg per kg per day. Patients in the two groups were matched for age, diagnosis, previous therapy, and chemotherapeutic PBPC mobilization regimens. RESULTS: No difference was observed in the median number of CD34+ cells harvested from each group.The number of leukapheresis procedures necessary to obtain a minimum of 3 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg was the same in both groups, and the percentage of patients who failed to achieve adequate PBPC collections was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The administration of low-dose G-CSF after chemotherapy appears equivalent to administration of the standard dose in achieving satisfactory PBPC collection.This approach could allow significant savings in medical cost. A randomized and prospective study is necessary, however, to assess the validity of these conclusions.     

The predictive value of white cell or CD34+ cell count in the peripheral blood for timing apheresis and maximizing yield

BACKGROUND: The collection of peripheral blood stem and progenitor cells (PBPCs) for transplantation can be time-consuming and expensive. Thus, the utility of counting CD34+ cells and white cells (WBCs) in the peripheral blood was evaluated as a predictor of CD34+ cell yield in the apheresis component. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The WBC and CD34+ cell counts in the peripheral blood and the apheresis components from 216 collections were assessed. Sixty-three patients underwent mobilization with chemotherapy plus filgrastim, and 17 patients and 14 allogeneic PBPC donors did so with filgrastim alone. The relationship between the number of WBC and CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood and in the apheresis component was analyzed by using rank correlation and linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The correlation coefficient for CD34+ cells per liter of peripheral blood with CD34+ cell yield (x 10(6)/kg) was 0.87 (n = 216 collections). This correlation existed for many patient and collection variables. However, patients with acute myeloid leukemia had fewer CD34+ cells in the apheresis component at any level of peripheral blood CD34+ cell count. Components collected from patients with CD34+ cell counts below 10 x 10(6) per L in the peripheral blood contained a median of 0.75 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. When the WBC count in the blood was below 5.0 x 10(9) per L, the median number of CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood was 5.6 x 10(6) per L (range, 1.0-15.5 x 10(6)/L). A very poor correlation was found between the WBC count in the blood and the CD34+ cell yield (p = 0.12, n = 158 collections). CONCLUSION: The number of CD34+ cells, but not WBCs, in the peripheral blood can be used as a predictor for timing of apheresis and estimating PBPC yield. This is a robust relationship not affected by a variety of patient and collection factors except the diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia. Patients who undergo mobilization with chemotherapy and filgrastim also should undergo monitoring of peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts, beginning when the WBC count in the blood exceeds 1.0 to 5.0 x 10(9) per L.     

Kinetics of PBPC mobilization by cyclophosphamide, as compared with that by epirubicin/paclitaxel followed by G-CSF support: implications for optimal timing of PBPC harvest

BACKGROUND: Limited information is available on the mobilization kinetics of autologous PBPCs after induction with various chemotherapy regimens. With PBPC mobilization in patients with breast cancer used as a model for chemotherapy-induced PBPC recruitment, the kinetics of progenitor cells mobilized either with cyclophosphamide (CY) or epirubicin/paclitaxel (EPI-TAX) followed by the administration of G-CSF was compared. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The study included a total of 86 patients with breast cancer (stage II-IV) receiving either CY (n = 39) or EPI-TAX (n = 47), both followed by G-CSF support. The progenitor cell content in peripheral blood and apheresis components was monitored by flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ cells. PBPC collection was started when the threshold of >20 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per L of peripheral blood was reached. RESULTS: The PBPC collection was begun a median of 9 days after the administration of EPI-TAX followed by G-CSF support, as compared to a median of 13 days after mobilization with CY plus G-CSF. After treatment with CY, the total numbers of PBPCs peaked on Day 1 of apheresis, and they rapidly declined thereafter. In contrast, treatment with EPI-TAX followed by G-CSF administration led to a steady mobilization of CD34+ cells during leukapheresis. The difference in the mobilization patterns with CY and EPI-TAX resulted in a greater yield of CD34+ cells per L of processed blood volume. Compared to EPI-TAX, mobilization with CY required the overall processing of 30 percent less whole-blood volume to reach the target yield of > or = 10 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg of body weight. After a median of three apheresis procedures, however, both CY+G-CSF and EPI-TAX+G-CSF were equally effective in obtaining this target yield. CONCLUSION: These results imply that specific PBPC mobilization as part of a given chemotherapy regimen should be taken into consideration before the planning of a PBPC harvest.     

The timing of granulocyte–colony-stimulating factor administration after chemotherapy does not affect stem and progenitor cell apheresis yield: a retrospective study of 65 cases

BACKGROUND: The optimal time for postchemotherapy granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration before peripheral blood stem and progenitor cell (PBPC) collection is not well defined. The impact of G-CSF scheduling on the number of CD34+ cells collected by leukapheresis from 65 patients with malignant disease was studied retrospectively. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Chemotherapy was performed on Days 1 and 2 and was followed by G-CSF to mobilize PBPCs. In Group 1, 30 patients received the first dose of G-CSF immediately after the end of chemotherapy, as commonly recommended. In Group 2, 35 patients received the first G-CSF dose after the end of chemotherapy (Days 7 or 8). RESULTS: No difference was observed between the two groups in white cell recovery and the median number of CD34+ cells harvested. The number of leukapheresis procedures necessary to obtain the minimal number of 3 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg was the same. The proportion of patients with a failure of PBPC collection was similar, and G-CSF consumption was reduced in Group 2 without increasing infectious risks. CONCLUSION: Early administration of G-CSF after chemotherapy appears not to be a prerequisite for satisfactory PBPC collection. This approach could allow significant savings in terms of medical cost. A randomized and prospective study would be necessary, however, to assess the validity of these conclusions.     

High platelet contamination in progenitor cell concentrates results in significantly lower CD34+ yield after immunoselection

BACKGROUND: Selection of CD34+ cells by specific immunoselection leads to a significant loss of those cells. The factors influencing the yield and purity are not well identified. The results of CD34+ selection from peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) with high and low platelet contamination that are harvested with two different cell separators are reported. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A progenitor cell concentrator (Ceprate SC, CellPro) was used to select CD34+ cells from 41 PBPC concentrates from 23 consecutive patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 3), breast cancer (n = 17), and multiple myeloma (n = 3). PBPC collection was performed by using two cell separators (CS3000 Plus, Fenwal: Group A, n = 11; and Spectra, COBE: Group B, n = 9). To reduce platelet contamination in the Spectra PBPC concentrates, an additional low-speed centrifugation was performed before CD34+ cell selection (Group C, n = 3). Leukapheresis components were stored overnight at 4 degrees C and combined with the next day's collection before the CD34+ selection procedure in 19 patients. RESULTS: A median of 1.5 leukapheresis procedures per patient were performed. Pooled PBPC concentrates showed no statistical difference in median numbers of white cells and CD34+ cells in Groups A and B: 3.2 (0.8-9.2) versus 4.4 (1.6-8. 3) x 10(10) white cells per kg and 15.0 (4.7-24.0) versus 12.0 (5. 6-34.0) x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. Platelet contamination was significantly higher in Group B: 0.67 (0.15-2.4) versus 2.3 (0.5-7. 1) x 10(11) (p = 0.0273). After the selection process, there was a significantly greater loss of CD34+ cells in Group B than in Group A: 39.1 versus 63.2 percent (p = 0.0070), with a median purity of 78. 0 percent versus 81.0 percent. An additional low-speed centrifugation before CD34+ cell selection seemed to reduce CD34+ cell loss in Group C with 16.9, 31.9, and 37.5 percent, respectively. CONCLUSION: CD34+ cell selection from PBPC concentrates resulted in an increased loss of CD34+ cells in concentrates with a higher platelet content. To improve CD34+ yield, PBPC concentrates with an initially low platelet contamination should be used, or additional low-speed centrifugation should be performed.     

The composition of leukapheresis products impacts on the hematopoietic recovery after autologous transplantation independently of the mobilization regimen

BACKGROUND: Effects of mobilization regimen on the composition of leukapheresis products (LPs) and on hematopoietic reconstitution after autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (PBPCT) are not well known. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The effects of three different mobilization regimens--stem cell factor (SCF) plus granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) plus cyclophosphamide (CCP), G-CSF alone, and G-CSF plus CCP--on the composition of LPs from patients with nonhematologic PBPC malignancies compared to LPs from G-CSF-mobilized healthy donors and normal marrow (BM) samples were analyzed. The impact of LP composition on both short- and long-term engraftment after autologous PBPCT was also evaluated. RESULTS: The most effective regimen for mobilization of CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) into peripheral blood was SCF, G-CSF, and CCP, providing the highest numbers of all CD34+ HPCs subsets analyzed. Patients mobilized with SCF plus G-CSF plus CCP showed the highest numbers of neutrophils and monocytes, whereas the highest numbers of lymphocytes and NK cells were observed in LPs from G-CSF-mobilized patients. The overall number of CD34+ HPCs was the strongest factor for predicting recovery of platelets, whereas the number of myelomonocytic-committed CD34+ precursors was the most powerful independent prognostic factor for WBC and neutrophil recovery. The overall number of CD4+ T cells returned showed an independent prognostic value for predicting the occurrence of infections, during the first year after transplant. CONCLUSIONS: The use of different mobilization regimens modifies the overall number of CD34+ HPCs obtained during leukapheresis procedures, and also affects both the absolute and the relative composition of the LPs in different CD34+ and CD34- cell subsets.     

In vitro collection and posttransfusion engraftment characteristics of MNCs obtained by using a new separator for autologous PBPC transplantation

BACKGROUND: A clinical study was performed to evaluate the peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection, transfusion, and engraftment characteristics associated with use of a blood cell separator (Amicus, Baxter Healthcare). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Oncology patients (n = 31) scheduled for an autologous PBPC transplant following myeloablative therapy were studied. PBPCs were mobilized by a variety of chemotherapeutic regimens and the use of G-CSF. As no prior studies evaluated whether PBPCs collected on the Amicus separator would be viable after transfusion, to ensure patient safety, PBPCs were first collected on another cell separator (CS-3000 Plus, Baxter) and stored as backup. The day after the CS-3000 Plus collections were completed, PBPC collections intended for transfusion were performed using the Amicus instrument. For each transplant, >2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ PBPCs per kg of body weight were transfused. RESULTS: Clinical data collected on the donors immediately before and after PBPC collection with the Amicus device were comparable to donor data similarly obtained for the CS-3000 Plus collections. While the number of CD34+ cells and the RBC volume in the collected products were equivalent for the two devices, the platelet content of the Amicus collections was significantly lower than that of the CS-3000 Plus collections (4.35 x 10(10) platelets/bag vs. 6.61 x 10(10) platelets/bag, p<0.05). Collection efficiencies for CD34+ cells were 64 +/- 23 percent for the Amicus device and 43 +/- 14 percent for the CS-3000 Plus device (p<0.05). The mean time to engraftment for cells collected via the Amicus device was 8.7 +/- 0.7 days for >500 PMNs per microL and 9.7 +/- 1.5 days to attain a platelet count of >20,000 per microL-equivalent to data in the literature. No CS-3000 Plus backup cells were transfused and no serious adverse events attributable to the Amicus device were encountered. CONCLUSIONS: The mean Amicus CD34+ cell collection efficiency was better (p<0.05) than that of the CS-3000 Plus collection. Short-term engraftment was durable. The PBPCs collected with the Amicus separator are safe and effective for use for autologous transplant patients requiring PBPC rescue from high-dose myeloablative chemotherapy.     

PBPC mobilization with paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and G-CSF with or without amifostine: results of a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND: The impact of amifostine on PBPC mobilization with paclitaxel and ifosfamide plus G-CSF was assessed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Forty patients with a median age of 34 years (range, 19-53) who had germ cell tumor were evaluated for high-dose chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either a single 500-mg dose of amifostine (Group A, n = 20) or no amifostine (Group B, n = 20) before mobilization chemotherapy with paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) given over 3 hours and ifosfamide (5 g/m(2)) given over 24 hours (TI) on Day 1. G-CSF at 10 microg per kg per day was given subsequent to TI with or without amifostine from Day 3 until the end of leukapheresis procedures. RESULTS: In 2 (10%) of 20 patients receiving amifostine and 3 (15%) of 20 patients not receiving it, no PBPC separation was performed because of mobilization failure. No significant differences were observed in the study arms with regard to the time from chemotherapy until first PBPC collection or the number of apheresis procedures needed to harvest more than 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. Furthermore, leukapheresis procedures yielded comparable doses of CD34+ cells per kg (3.4 x 10(6) vs. 3.6 x 10(6); p = 0.82), MNCs per kg (2.7 x 10(8) vs. 2.6 x 10(8); p = 0.18), and CFU-GM per kg (15.9 x 10(4) vs. 19.3 x 10(4); p = 0.20). Patients in Group A had higher numbers of circulating CD34+ cells on Day 10 (103.0/microL vs. 46.8/microL; p = 0.10) and on Day 11 (63.0/microL vs.14.3/microL; p = 0.04) than did patients in Group B. CONCLUSION: Administration of a single dose of amifostine before chemotherapy with TI mobilized higher numbers of CD34 cells in the circulation, but did not enhance the overall collection efficiency in the present trial.     

The dose of granulocyte–colony-stimulating factor after chemopriming treatment does not influence apheresis yield of progenitor cells: a retrospective study of 91 cases

BACKGROUND: The optimal dose of post-chemotherapy granulocyte–colony-stimulating factor (G–CSF) administration before peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection has not been determined as yet, although 5 μg per kg per day has been recommended as the standard dose. This study retrospectively analyzed the effect of G–CSF dose on peripheral blood CD34+ cell collection from 91 patients with hematologic malignancies.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Various doses of G–CSF were administered after several chemotherapeutic PBPC mobilization regimens. According to the dose of G–CSF administered, patients were assigned to two groups. Group 1 included 46 patients who received a low dose of G–CSF (median, 3.6 [range, 2.8-4.6] μg/kg/day). Group 2 included 45 patients who received a standard G–CSF dose of 6.0 (5.5-8.1) μg per kg per day. Patients in the two groups were matched for age, diagnosis, previous therapy, and chemotherapeutic PBPC mobilization regimens.
RESULTS: No difference was observed in the median number of CD34+ cells harvested from each group. The number of leukapheresis procedures necessary to obtain a minimum of 3 × 10⁶ CD34+ cells per kg was the same in both groups, and the percentage of patients who failed to achieve adequate PBPC collections was similar in the two groups.
CONCLUSION: The administration of low-dose G–CSF after chemotherapy appears equivalent to administration of the standard dose in achieving satisfactory PBPC collection. This approach could allow significant savings in medical cost. A randomized and prospective study is necessary, however, to assess the validity of these conclusions.     

Preterm birth and the availability of cord blood for HPC transplantation

BACKGROUND: Cord blood from deliveries at term can be used for HPC transplantation. The objective of this study was to determine the amounts of cord blood nucleated cells (NCs) and HPCs that were collectable from preterm deliveries. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Cord blood collected from preterm deliveries between 22 and 36 weeks of gestation was compared with regard to volume, NC count (/mL), CD34+ cell count (/mL), and the NC and CD34+ cell counts per cord blood sample and at different gestational ages. RESULTS: A correlation was found between gestational age and NC count (r = 0.52, p<0.001), and an inverse relation was found between gestational age and CD34+ cell count (r = - 0.68, p<0.001). The CD34+ cell count per cord blood sample was independent of gestational age (r = - 0.13, p = NS), and no significant difference between early (22-32 week) and late (33-36 week) preterm deliveries was found (p = 0.870). Comparison with published data from cord blood transplantations revealed that up to one-third of preterm samples contained at least as many NCs (or CD34+ cells) as the median cell dose transplanted (calculated for the median recipient weight) in the respective study. Furthermore, 77 percent of all preterm samples contained at least 1 x 10(7) NCs (and 42% at least 1 x 10(5) CD34+ cells) per kg for transplantation in a recipient of 20-kg body weight, which corresponds to the lower threshold of cells per kg in the graft recommended by Eurocord. CONCLUSION: Preterm delivery should not be a reason to exclude cord blood collection if allogeneic cord blood transplantation in a sibling is planned.     

Poor mobilizer and its countermeasures

Mobilization failure is a major concern in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation, especially in an autologous setting, as almost all donor harvests can be accomplished with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone. Poor mobilizers, defined as those with a peripheral blood CD34⁺ cell count ≤20 cells/μl after mobilization preceding apheresis is a significant risk factor for mobilization failure. We recommend preemptive plerixafor plus G-CSF (filgrastim, 10?μg/kg daily) as a first mobilization strategy, which yields sufficient peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) in almost all patients and avoids otherwise unnecessary remobilization. Preemptive plerixafor is administered in patients with a day-4 peripheral blood CD34⁺ count <15, depending on the disease and the target PBPC amount. Cyclophosphamide is reserved for patients who fail the first PBPC collection. We recommend second mobilization for patients who could not achieve a sufficient PBPC amount with the first mobilization. In these patients, a second attempt with plerixafor plus G-CSF or mobilization with plerixafor in combination with cyclophosphamide and G-CSF is recommended. Increased dose and/or twice daily administration of G-CSF can be considered.     

A single dose of 6 or 12 mg of pegfilgrastim for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization results in similar yields of CD34+ progenitors in patients with multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND: Current regimens for peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma are based on daily subcutaneous injections of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) starting shortly after cytotoxic therapy. Recently a polyethylene glycol-conjugated G-CSF (pegfilgrastim) was introduced that has a substantially longer t(1/2) than the original formula. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The use of pegfilgrastim was examined at two dose levels for PBPC mobilization in patients with Stage II or III multiple myeloma. Four days after cytotoxic therapy with cyclophosphamide (4 g/m(2)), a single dose of either 6 mg pegfilgrastim (n = 15) or 12 mg pegfilgrastim (n = 15) or daily doses of 8 microg per kg unconjugated G-CSF (n = 15) were administered. The number of circulating CD34+ cells was determined during white blood cell (WBC) recovery, and PBPC harvesting was performed by large-volume apheresis. RESULTS: Pegfilgrastim was equally potent at 6 and 12 mg with regard to mobilization and yield of CD34+ cells. No dose dependence was observed because CD34+ cell concentration peaks were 131 and 85 per microL, respectively, and CD34+ cell yield was 10.2 x 10(6) and 7.4 x 10(6) per kg of body weight, respectively. Pegfilgrastim in either dose was associated with a more rapid WBC recovery (p = 0.03) and an earlier performance of the first apheresis procedure (p < 0.05) in comparison to unconjugated G-CSF. No difference regarding CD34+ cell maximum and yield could be observed. CONCLUSION: A single dose of 6 mg pegfilgrastim is equally potent as 12 mg for mobilization and harvest of PBPCs in patients with multiple myeloma. Because no dose dependency was seen at these dose levels, this might be also true for even smaller doses.     

Successful mobilization of peripheral blood HPCs with G-CSF alone in patients failing to achieve sufficient numbers of CD34+ cells and/or CFU-GM with chemotherapy and G-CSF

BACKGROUND: Mobilization with chemotherapy and G-CSF may result in poor peripheral blood HPC collection, yielding <2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg or <10 x 10(4) CFU-GM per kg in leukapheresis procedures. The best mobilization strategy for oncology patients remains unclear. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In 27 patients who met either the CD34 (n = 3) or CFU-GM (n = 2) criteria or both (n = 22), the results obtained with two successive strategies-that is, chemotherapy and G-CSF at 10 microg per kg (Group 1, n = 7) and G-CSF at 10 microg per kg alone (Group 2, n = 20) used for a second mobilization course-were retrospectively analyzed. The patients had non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (5), Hodgkin's disease (3), multiple myeloma (5), chronic myeloid leukemia (1), acute myeloid leukemia (1), breast cancer (6), or other solid tumors (6). Previous therapy consisted of 10 (1-31) cycles of chemotherapy with additional chlorambucil (n = 3), interferon (n = 3), and radiotherapy (n = 7). RESULTS: The second collection was undertaken a median of 35 days after the first one. In Group 1, the results of the two mobilizations were identical. In Group 2, the number of CD34+ cells per kg per apheresis (0.17 [0.02-0.45] vs. 0.44 [0.11-0.45], p = 0. 00002), as well as the number of CFU-GM (0.88 [0.00-13.37] vs. 4.19 [0.96-21.61], p = 0.00003), BFU-E (0.83 [0.00-12.72] vs. 8.81 [1. 38-32.51], p = 0.00001), and CFU-MIX (0.10 [0.00-1.70] vs. 0.56 [0. 00-2.64], p = 0.001134) were significantly higher in the second peripheral blood HPC collection. However, yields per apheresis during the second collection did not significantly differ in the two groups. Six patients in Group 1 and 18 in Group 2 underwent transplantation, and all but one achieved engraftment, with a median of 15 versus 12 days to 1,000 neutrophils (NS), 22 versus 16 days to 1 percent reticulocytes (NS), and 26 versus 26 days to 20,000 platelets (NS), respectively. However, platelet engraftment was particularly delayed in many patients. CONCLUSION: G-CSF at 10 microg per kg alone may constitute a valid alternative to chemotherapy and G-CSF to obtain adequate numbers of peripheral blood HPCs in patients who previously failed to achieve mobilization with chemotherapy and G-CSF. This strategy should be tested in prospective randomized trials.     

Allogeneic blood progenitor cell collection in normal donors after mobilization with filgrastim: the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience

BACKGROUND: Information on the safety and efficacy of allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection in filgrastim-mobilized normal donors is still limited. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The PBPC donor database from a 42-month period (12/94-5/98) was reviewed for apheresis and clinical data related to PBPC donation. Normal PBPC donors received filgrastim (6 microg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours) for 3 to 4 days and subsequently underwent daily leukapheresis. The target collection was > or =4 x 10(6)CD34+ cells per kg of recipient's body weight. RESULTS: A total of 350 donors were found to be evaluable. Their median age was 41 years (range, 4-79). Their median preapheresis white cell count was 42.8 x 10(9) per L (range, 18.3-91.6). Of these donors, 17 (5%) had inadequate peripheral venous access. Leukapheresis could not be completed because of apheresis-related adverse events in 2 donors (0.5%). Of the 324 donors evaluable for apheresis yield data, 221 (68%) reached the collection target with one leukapheresis. The median CD34+ cell dose collected (first leukapheresis) was 462 x 10(6) (range, 29-1463).The main adverse events related to filgrastim administration in donors evaluable for toxicity (n = 341) were bone pain (84%), headache (54%), fatigue (31%), and nausea (13%). These events were rated as moderate to severe (grade 2-3) by 171 (50%) of the donors. In 2 donors (0.5%), they prompted the discontinuation of filgrastim administration. CONCLUSION: PBPC apheresis for allogeneic transplantation is safe and well tolerated. It allows the collection of an "acceptable" PBPC dose in most normal donors with one leukapheresis, with minimal need for invasive procedures.     

Umbilical cord blood progeny cells that retain a CD34+ phenotype after ex vivo expansion have less engraftment potential than unexpanded CD34+ cells

BACKGROUND: Because of the limitation of cell numbers associated with cord blood harvests, there is a need to determine the efficacy of using ex vivo-expanded cord blood cells in a transplantation setting. In this study, limiting-dilution analysis was used in nonobese diabetic mice with severe combined immunodeficiency (NOD/SCID) to compare the engraftment potential of progeny cells expressing the CD34+ phenotype after expansion with that of uncultured CD34+ cells. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Cord blood CD34+ cells were cultured in Iscove's modified Dulbecco medium supplemented with 10-percent fetal calf serum (FCS) and IL-6, SCF, megakaryocyte growth and development factor, and Flt3 ligand. The resulting ex vivo-expanded products were assessed for total numbers of nucleated cells, CD34+ cells, and CFUs and long-term culture-initiating cell activity. The engraftment potentials of cultured progeny CD34+ cells and uncultured CD34+ cells were determined by using NOD/SCID mice. RESULTS: After 14 days of culture, total nucleated cell counts increased over input values by 180 +/- 59-fold, CD34+ cell numbers by 44 +/- 13-fold, CFU activity by 23 +/- 5-fold, and long-term culture-initiating cell activity by 20 +/- 6-fold (mean +/- SD; n = 6). The frequency of SCID-repopulating cells (SRC) in mice transplanted with uncultured products was 1 per 20,000 CD34+ cells (95% CI, 1:10,000-1:38,000) and that in mice receiving ex vivo-expanded products was 1 per 418,000 progeny CD34+ cells (95% CI, 1:158,000-1:1,100,000). Taken together, these data indicated that, after 2 weeks of culture, there was a modest twofold increase in the total number of SRCs. However, the levels of human CD45 cell engraftment in NOD/SCID recipients of progeny CD34+ cells were significantly lower than those in mice receiving equivalent numbers of uncultured CD34+ cells (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Umbilical cord blood progeny cells retaining a CD34+ phenotype after ex vivo expansion have less engraftment potential than do unexpanded CD34+ cells.     

Immune reconstitution after autologous selected peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation: comparison of two CD34+ cell-selection systems

BACKGROUND: Selection of CD34+ PBPCs has been applied as a method of reducing graft contamination from neoplastic cells. This procedure seems to delay lymphocyte recovery, while myeloid engraftment is no different from that with unselected PBPC transplants. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Lymphocyte recovery was studied in two groups of patients who underwent autologous CD34+ PBPC transplant with two different technologies (Ceprate SC, Cellpro [n = 17]; CliniMACS, Miltenyi Biotech [n = 13]). The median number of CD34+ cells transfused was 3.88 x 10(6) per kg and 3.32 x 10(6) per kg, respectively. Residual CD3 cells x 10(6) per kg were 4.97 and 0.58, respectively (p = 0.041). Residual CD19 cells x 10(6) per kg were 1.33 and 0.73, respectively (NS). RESULTS: No differences were found between the two groups in total lymphocyte recovery to >0.5 x 10(9) per L, which achieved a stable count by Day 30. During the study period, the CD4+ cell count remained below 0.2 x 10(9) per L, and the B-cell subset showed a trend toward normalization. CD3/HLA-DR+ and CD16/56 increased markedly in both groups by Day 30. An increase in CMV (13%) and adenovirus (17.4%) infection was found in both groups. CONCLUSION: Both CD34+ cell selection technologies used here determined an excellent CD34+ cell purity and an optimal depletion of T cells. The high rate of viral complications is probably due to the inability of residual T cells left from the CD34+ cell selection to generate, immediately after transplant, an adequate number of virus-specific lymphocytes.     

Serum supplement, inoculum cell density, and accessory cell effects are dependent on the cytokine combination selected to expand human HPCs ex vivo

BACKGROUND: The prolonged periods of pancytopenia associated with cord blood transplants suggest that in some cases cell numbers may be limiting. The possibility that limiting cell numbers may be overcome and prolonged periods of pancytopenia abrogated by the transplantation of human umbilical cord blood cells expanded ex vivo has led to efforts to define optimal culture conditions for these cells. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Cord blood CD34+ cells were cultured with three cytokine combinations: SCF+G-CSF+GM-CSF+MGDF (SGGM); IL-6+ SCF+MGDF+Flt3-ligand (6SMF); and IL-1+IL-3+IL-6+G-CSF+GM-CSF+SCF+Epo (GFmix). Serum effects, inoculum concentration (cells/mL) seeding density (cell/cm(2)) and accessory cell effects on the expansion of CD34+ cells were determined. RESULTS: Cellular outputs were significantly higher with fetal calf serum (FCS) than with cord blood serum (CBS) or adult group AB serum (ABS) in the presence of 6SMF, however, CBS was as effective as FCS. The best seeding concentrations varied for each of the cytokine combinations, and inoculum densities exceeding 1000 cells per cm(2) proved detrimental for cultures containing GFmix and SGGM. Accessory cell studies indicated that populations expressing the CD33 antigen inhibited the expansion of purified CD34+ cells in the presence of GFmix or SGGM, but not in the presence of 6SMF. CONCLUSION: Serum supplement, inoculum cell concentration, seeding densities, and accessory cell effects are dependent upon the cytokine combination selected to expand cord blood HPCs ex vivo. Thus, each of these measures should be assessed to establish reproducible and reliable conditions for the selection of different cytokine combinations to culture cord blood HPCs.     

恶性血液系统疾病自体外周血造血干细胞动员的临床分析

目的:分析恶性血液系统疾病患者外周血造血干细胞动员与采集过程中的影响因素。方法:对50例血液系统恶性疾病患者在东南大学附属中大医院血液科进行外周血造血干细胞动员。对患者年龄、性别、动员方案、疾病状态、采集机器等因素进行分析,评估以上因素对干细胞动员结果的影响,并分析了采集前白细胞、血红蛋白、血小板的数量与采集的CD34^+细胞计数的相关性。结果:动员方案对CD34^+细胞采集数及CD34^+细胞采集成功率的影响有显著性影响,而性别、年龄、确诊到动员间隔时间、既往化疗方案、骨髓受累与否等对干细胞采集数量影响并不显著。采集前外周血白细胞数量及血红蛋白数量与采集的CD34^+细胞数呈正相关。采集前外周血中白细胞计数及单个核细胞计数与采集成功密切相关。结论:化疗联合细胞因子的动员方案采集造血干细胞优于单用细胞因子的动员方案。通过采集前白细胞计数及单个核细胞计数确定合适的采集时机,可以提高采集的成功率。