Quality of life following treatment for early prostate cancer: does low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy offer a better outcome? A review

OBJECTIVE: Due to a lack of evidence from randomised studies, there is little agreement on the best form of treatment among men who require curative treatment for prostate cancer. The relative impact of the various treatments on symptoms and health-related quality of life is also controversial. We review the literature on quality of life changes following low dose rate brachytherapy (BXT) and compare BXT to other treatments for early prostate cancer. METHODS: Systematic literature review 1988-2003 (Medline). Keywords: Brachytherapy; Radical prostatectomy; External beam radiotherapy; Quality of life; Symptoms. RESULTS: Review of the current literature suggests that radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy and BXT either alone or in combination with supplementary external beam radiotherapy offer good long-term health-related quality of life. However differences exist in the toxicity of treatment in terms of erectile function, voiding difficulty, incontinence and bowel function. These differences seem to persist for at least 3-5 years post-treatment though longer-term quality of life outcomes from modern techniques are unknown. CONCLUSION: BXT offers a high probability of maintaining continence, potency and normal rectal function though both storage and voiding urinary symptoms have been reported. Addition of androgen deprivation and EBRT to BXT may increase urinary, bowel and sexual toxicity of treatment. Quality of life outcome following brachytherapy compares favourably with other radical treatment options for the management of early prostate cancer.     

Morbidity and mortality of local failure after definitive therapy for prostate cancer

We reviewed our experience with morbidity and mortality associated with clinical local failure after definitive therapy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate by interstitial 125iodine implantation, external beam radiation therapy or radical prostatectomy. Morbid complications included unilateral ureteral obstruction; bladder obstruction and/or incontinence requiring treatment by transurethral resection, or placement of a urethral or suprapubic catheter; hematuria requiring intervention for clot evacuation or fulguration, and perineal and/or pelvic pain. Lethal complications included bilateral ureteral obstruction or bowel obstruction. We treated 108 patients with 125iodine, 178 with external beam radiotherapy and 67 with radical prostatectomy. Clinical local failure occurred in 26 per cent of the 125iodine, 17 per cent of the external beam radiotherapy and 12 per cent of the radical prostatectomy groups. The total incidence of local failure with 125iodine was statistically higher than for radical prostatectomy. Stage C and poorly differentiated tumors were associated with a statistically higher incidence of local failure compared to lower stage and grade tumors. However, within each stage and grade there was no significant difference in local failure between treatment modalities. There was negligible morbidity or mortality secondary to local failure associated with stage A2, stage B1 or well differentiated tumors regardless of treatment modality. There was no difference in the morbidity and mortality between treatment modalities for stage C or poorly differentiated tumors. However, for stage B2 or moderately differentiated tumors treated by 125iodine implantation there was a statistically greater incidence of morbidity and mortality than that associated with external beam radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy. Our observations with regard to selection of primary monotherapy options that provide local tumor control are as follows. Stage A2, stage B1 or well differentiated tumors can be well controlled by all 3 treatment modalities. 125Iodine is associated with local failure-related morbidity and mortality for stage B2 or moderately differentiated tumors, which are statistically higher than for external beam radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy, and therefore, these latter are the preferred treatment. Radical prostatectomy and 125iodine for stage C tumors are associated with a trend to higher local failure, and related morbidity and mortality than is external beam radiotherapy. However, longer followup of the external beam radiotherapy series is necessary to confirm this observation.     

Quality of life outcomes after brachytherapy for early stage prostate cancer

PURPOSE: We compare general and disease specific health related quality of life in men undergoing brachytherapy for early stage prostate cancer to those undergoing radical prostatectomy and age matched healthy controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cohorts consisted of 48 men treated with brachytherapy with and without pretreatment external beam radiation therapy (brachytherapy group), 74 who underwent radical prostatectomy (prostatectomy group) and age matched healthy controls from the literature. The RAND 36-item general health survey, University of California Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index, American Urological Association symptom index, validated Cancer Interference with Life and Family Scales, and sociodemographic and co-morbidity questionnaires were completed 3 to 17 months after treatment. RESULTS: General health related quality of life did not differ greatly among the 3 groups. Urinary function (leakage) was worse in the brachytherapy group than in controls but better than in the prostatectomy group. Brachytherapy group patients had more irritative urinary symptoms and worse bowel function than controls. Sexual function and bother were worse in prostatectomy and brachytherapy groups than in healthy controls. Physical function, bodily pain, urinary function, and bother and American Urological Association symptom index scores improved with time after brachytherapy. Patients who underwent brachytherapy after external beam radiation performed worse in all general and disease specific health related quality of life domains compared to those who did not undergo pretreatment radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: At an average of 7.5 months after treatment the general health related quality of life of patients undergoing brachytherapy with and without pretreatment external beam radiation was similar to age matched controls, although urinary, bowel and sexual problems were reported. These problems appeared to improve during the first year after treatment. Much of the impairment in disease specific health related quality of life among patients undergoing brachytherapy may be attributed to pretreatment radiation.     

Incidence of urethral stricture after primary treatment for prostate cancer: data From CaPSURE

PURPOSE: We determined the incidence of treatment for urethral stricture, including bladder neck contracture, after primary treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 6,597 men with newly diagnosed, localized prostate cancer and no history of urethral stricture disease were identified in the CaPSURE database. Treatment modalities included radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, cryotherapy, androgen deprivation therapy, radical prostatectomy plus external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy plus external beam radiotherapy and watchful waiting. The database was queried for patient reported history or International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision/Common Procedural Terminology codes consistent with stricture treatment after prostate cancer therapy. Time to obstruction was examined by the Kaplan-Meier method. Risk factors for stricture were examined in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The incidence of stricture treatment was 344 of 6,597 cases (5.2%, range 1.1% to 8.4% by prostate cancer treatment type). Median followup was 2.7 years. In the multivariate model primary treatment type (p <0.0001), body mass index (p <0.0001) and age (p = 0.0002) were significant predictors of stricture treatment. After controlling for age and body mass index the HR for treatments compared to watchful waiting was significantly higher for radical prostatectomy (HR = 10.4, p <0.0001) and brachytherapy plus external beam radiotherapy (HR = 4.6, p = 0.0231). After radical prostatectomy most failures occurred within the first 6 months and failures were rare after 24 months, whereas after radiation failures occurred later. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of urethral stricture treatment after prostate cancer therapy is 1.1% to 8.4% depending on cancer treatment type. Risk was highest after radical prostatectomy or brachytherapy plus external beam radiotherapy and in those with advanced age or obesity. Stricture after radical prostatectomy occurred within the first 24 months, whereas onset was delayed after radiation.     

Quality of life after treatment for localized prostate cancer: differences based on treatment modality

PURPOSE: Brachytherapy with 103palladium (103Pd) is an increasingly administered treatment modality for localized prostate cancer. We compared general and disease specific health related quality of life after 103Pd treatment, radical prostatectomy and external beam radiation therapy given during the same time frame. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional survey study of patients treated at a single community medical center between 1995 and 1999. We mailed 5 validated health related quality of life survey instruments to 269, 142 and 222 men who underwent radical prostatectomy, 103Pd treatment and external beam radiation therapy, respectively, with a response rate of greater than 80% in all groups. RESULTS: General health related quality of life assessed by the SF-36 showed the same scores in patients who underwent prostatectomy and 103Pd treatment. The University of California-Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index was used to assess bowel, urinary and sexual function/bothersomeness. External beam radiation therapy reported was associated with worse bowel function and greater bowel bothersomeness. Prostatectomy was associated with worse urinary function compared to 103Pd and external beam radiation therapy. Prostatectomy was associated with worse sexual function than 103Pd or external beam radiation therapy, although nerve sparing surgery and erectile aids minimized the difference. American Urological Association symptom scores were initially higher for 103Pd but became equal to those in the other groups in patients treated greater than 12 months from survey time. Disease-free men who underwent prostatectomy and 103Pd brachytherapy were equally confident that cancer would not recur in the future. Satisfaction rates were equivalent and biochemical failure significantly decreased satisfaction in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: While general health related quality of life was mostly unaffected by the 3 most common treatments for prostate cancer, there were differences in bowel, urinary and sexual function. This information may aid patients in the decision making process.     

Psychological distress in Japanese men with localized prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE: To investigate: (i) the level of psychological distress; and (ii) the relationships between the level of psychological distress and general or disease-specific HRQOL of Japanese men with localized prostate cancer following surgery or radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was a retrospective cross-sectional survey of 253 men with localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy and 87 with external beam radiotherapy were collected. The measures used four questionnaires including: (i) the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Health Survey; (ii) The University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index; (iii) International Prostate Symptom Score; and (iv) Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). RESULTS: Mean anxiety and depression scores were 4.0 and 4.7, respectively (standard deviation, 3.3 and 3.7). On the anxiety section of HADS, 291 patients (85%) scored 7 points or less; and on the depression scale, 183 (54%) patients scored 4 points or less. Those 'cases' (HADS total, >10) with psychological distress scored lower in all domains of the general and disease related health-related quality of life (HRQOL) than the 'non-cases' (HADS total, 相似文献   

Health related quality of life in Japanese men after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: We performed a retrospective survey of general and disease specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after radical prostatectomy (RP) and external beam radiotherapy (XRT) in Japanese men. METHODS: A total of 186 patients underwent RP and 78 underwent XRT for clinically localized prostate cancer between 2000 and 2002. We measured the general and disease specific HRQOL with the MOS 36-Item Health Survey and the University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index, respectively. Each treatment group was further divided into four subgroups according to the time scale. RESULTS: Patients from the RP group were significantly younger than those from the XRT group. The tumor characteristics differed significantly in their distributions among the treatment groups. Patients undergoing XRT had low scores in most of the general measures of HRQOL just after treatment, but after 6 months there were no differences between the treatment groups, except for the physical domains. The RP group was associated with worse urinary function, whereas the XRT group had worse bowel function and bother during the first 6 months after treatment. Thereafter, however, urinary and bowel domain did not differ between the groups. Both groups reported poor sexual function, although the RP group scored lower sexual bother. CONCLUSION: The patients who underwent RP had significantly worse urinary and better bowel function than those treated with XRT. Both treatment groups had decrements in sexual function throughout the post-treatment period; careful attention should be paid to this side-effect in preoperative counselling, especially in younger patients, regardless of the primary treatments.     

Brachytherapy for the treatment of recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy

What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? The curative treatment of prostate cancer includes surgery, external beam radiation or interstitial radiation. However, a high percentage of patients may develop recurrent disease, which is often localised. The possibilities of treatment in these cases, including surgery or adjuvant radiotherapy, are not well defined. Brachytherapy is a well established first-line treatment option. We review and update the use of brachytherapy in the treatment of recurrences post-radiotherapy, brachytherapy or radical prostatectomy as an alternative to surgery and radiotherapy, with a focus on functional and oncological outcomes. Salvage therapeutic options following radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy for patients with local relapse of prostate cancer include radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy, brachytherapy or cryotherapy. Salvage radical prostatectomy following radiotherapy failure is associated with a 5-year PSA relapse-free rate of 30-40%. Biochemical relapse-free survival rates after salvage radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy failure range from 10% to 77% after a follow-up of 22-60 months. A number of studies have evaluated salvage brachytherapy for radiotherapy failure and 5-year biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) rate results reported are of the order of 20-87%; one study reported a 10-year bDFS rate of 54%. Fewer studies in small numbers of patients and with shorter follow-up have been conducted on brachytherapy for radical prostatectomy failure and bDFS rates reported include 25.8% at a median of 29 months to 70% at a median of 20 months. The side-effects were as expected for brachytherapy. A newer initiative conducted in Spain in a larger series of 42 patients with failure following radical prostatectomy involves brachytherapy with RAPID Strand?(125) I seeds and real-time placement. The 5-year bDFS rate was 88.6% and cancer-specific survival was 97%; complication rates were low. Optimization of salvage brachytherapy is under way and involves accurate placement of seeds, dose optimization and optimal patient selection.     

Iodine seed prostate brachytherapy: an alternative first-line choice for early prostate cancer

This article on permanent iodine-125 seed prostate brachytherapy reviews the techniques, results, and patient selection issues for early prostate cancer. The long-term 10 y results of brachytherapy from Seattle, and their reproducibility in other centres both in the USA and UK are reported. The use of hormone therapy in brachytherapy and the value of combining external beam radiotherapy with a brachytherapy implant are discussed. Reviewed comparative data show the similarity of biochemical survival in patients treated with brachytherapy, radical prostatectomy, and external beam radiotherapy. The role of brachytherapy as a first-line treatment option for patients with prostate cancer is demonstrated.     

Quality of life after treatment for prostate cancer

Quality of life is a major concern of patients when they are choosing treatment for prostate cancer. Health-related quality of life is a patient-centered variable from the field of health services research that can be measured in a valid and reliable manner. Using standardized questionnaires specifically developed to capture health-related quality of life data in men with prostate cancer, the effect of treatments on patients’ quality of life can be studied. Patients with localized disease who are undergoing radical prostatectomy tend to have more sexual and urinary dysfunction than men undergoing external beam radiation therapy, although both groups have more impairment in these areas than agematched controls. Men undergoing external beam radiation therapy have worse bowel function and more urinary distress from irritative voiding symptoms than men undergoing radical prostatectomy or age-matched controls. Recent studies of men undergoing interstitial brachytherapy indicate that these patients have less urinary leakage than those who undergo radical prostatectomy, but experience considerably more irritating voiding symptoms, which often profoundly affect their quality of life. Better information regarding the potential impact of prostate cancer treatment on quality of life will improve medical decision-making.     

Prostate brachytherapy: treatment strategies.

PURPOSE: Patients who present with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer may be candidates for prostate brachytherapy. We evaluated the treatment outcomes in a diverse group of prostate cancer patients who presented with low, moderate and high risk features. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 301 patients who presented with T1 to T3 prostate cancer were treated with brachytherapy alone or combined with hormonal therapy and/or external beam irradiation. Of these patients 109 at low risk with prostate specific antigen (PSA) 10 ng./ml. or less, Gleason score 6 or less and clinical stage T2a or less were treated with 125iodine alone, 152 at moderate risk with PSA greater than 10 ng./ml., Gleason score greater than 6 or stage T2b or greater were treated with 125iodine or 103palladium or combined implant alone with 5 months of hormonal therapy, and 40 at high risk with PSA greater than 15 ng./ml., Gleason 8 or greater, clinical stage T2c to T3 or positive seminal vesicle biopsy (20) were treated with combination brachytherapy, external beam irradiation and 9 months of hormonal therapy. Patients with a positive seminal vesicle biopsy (T3c disease) and negative pelvic lymph nodes were included in the high risk group, and the walls of the seminal vesicles were also treated with implantation. Followup was performed every 6 months with digital rectal examination and ultrasound evaluation. Prostate biopsy was routinely recommended 2 years after completion of the radiation. Failure was defined as PSA increase on 2 consecutive determinations above 1 ng./ml. or evidence of local recurrence on digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasound or biopsy. Kaplan-Meier projections were used to calculate progression-free survival rates. RESULTS: Of the 109 patients at low risk followed from 1 to 7 years (median 18 months) 91% were free of PSA failure at 4 years. No patient experienced urinary incontinence following implantation, although grade 1 to 2 radiation proctitis occurred in 5 (4.5%). Of the 152 patients at moderate risk 73 received implantation and 79 received implantation combined with hormonal therapy. The 4-year biochemical freedom from failure rate for the hormone group was 85% versus 58% for the no hormone group (p = 0.08). The difference was more significant for those with Gleason score 7 or greater (90 versus 43%, p = 0.01) and for those with PSA greater than 10 ng./ml. (87 versus 59%, p = 0.04). Grade 1 to 2 radiation proctitis occurred in 1 of the 79 patients (1.3%) receiving hormonal therapy and in 3 (4%) treated with implantation only. There were no cases of urinary incontinence. Of the 40 patients at high risk 71% were free of biochemical failure at 3 years. Of the 4 patients with failure (10%) 3 (75%) originally had positive seminal vesicle biopsies. Five patients experienced gastrointestinal complications, although none was grade 3 or 4. The actuarial freedom from grade 2 proctitis was 82%. No patient experienced urinary incontinence. Prostate biopsies were negative in 87% of the low risk, 96.8 (hormone group) versus 68.6% (no hormone group) of the moderate risk (p = 0.0023) and 86% of the high risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: Brachytherapy appears to offer comparable results to external beam irradiation and radical prostatectomy when patients are stratified by disease extent. Adopting a strategy of implant alone, implant with hormonal therapy or implant with hormonal therapy and external beam irradiation in patients who present with low to high risk features can improve the overall results in the more advanced cases.     

Disease-specific quality of life among patients with localized prostate cancer: an Australian perspective

OBJECTIVES: To examine differences in sexual, urinary and bowel function, and bother, in patients with prostate cancer after treatment with radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiation (EBRT), compared to a convenience sample of men with no diagnosis of prostate cancer, as little is known about the disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of men in Australia after treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was a retrospective cross-sectional survey of 95 controls, 82 men with localized prostate cancer treated with RP and 39 with EBRT at > or = 2 years before data were collected. Disease-specific HRQoL was assessed using the University of California Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index, a validated measure that includes six subscales addressing sexual, urinary and bowel symptoms, and level of bother associated with the symptoms. Univariate analyses were conducted to ascertain differences in disease-specific HRQoL among the three groups. To minimize the influence of other factors, age and comorbid medical conditions were included as covariates. RESULTS: Men treated with RP had more sexual and urinary symptoms (both P < 0.001) than those treated with EBRT, and more sexual bother (P < 0.001). Men treated with EBRT reported significantly worse bowel function (P = 0.02) and more bother (P < 0.001) with these symptoms than those who had RP. CONCLUSIONS: Except for bowel dysfunction and the bother associated with these symptoms, disease-specific HRQoL was generally worse after RP than EBRT.     

Successful salvage robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy after external beam radiotherapy failure

We describe the first case of salvage robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for local recurrence after external beam radiotherapy. A 50-year-old man initially underwent combined external beam radiotherapy and hormonal treatment for Stage T2a prostate adenocarcinoma. The prostate-specific antigen level was 10.5 ng/mL, and the Gleason score was 3+3. Two years later, he developed biopsy-proven recurrent disease. He underwent salvage robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. The patient was discharged on day 1 postoperatively. The histologic analysis revealed an organ-confined tumor. His prostate-specific antigen at 3 months was <0.03 ng/mL, and he was continent. Salvage robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is a safe and technically feasible salvage treatment for prostate cancer for which primary radiotherapy has failed.     

Comparison of Radical Prostatectomy and Iodine 125 Interstitial Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: A 7-Year Biochemical (PSA) Progression Analysis

Objectives. To evaluate the relative efficacy of brachytherapy to radical prostatectomy, we compared biochemical progression rates from a published series of men who underwent iodine 125 (¹²⁵I) interstitial radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer to a similar group of men who underwent anatomic radical prostatectomy using appropriate end points.Methods. Seventy-six men who underwent anatomic radical prostatectomy between 1988 and 1990 were carefully matched for Gleason score and clinical stage to a recently reported contemporary series of patients treated at another institution with ¹²⁵I brachytherapy without adjuvant treatment. The definition of biochemical progression was a serum PSA level greater than 0.2 ng/mL after anatomic radical prostatectomy and greater than 0.5 ng/mL for brachytherapy-treated patients.Results. The 7-year actuarial PSA progression-free survival following anatomic radical prostatectomy was 97.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85.6% to 99.7%) for this group of men selected to match the brachytherapy group, compared to 79% (95% CI not published) for men treated with ¹²⁵I interstitial radiotherapy.Conclusions. Using comparative end points for biochemical-free progression, failure rates may be higher following ¹²⁵I interstitial radiotherapy compared to anatomic radical prostatectomy. These data provide a better comparison of biochemical progression than previously published studies and emphasize the need for caution in interpreting the relative efficacy of brachytherapy in controlling localized prostate cancer.     

Radical prostatectomy versus high-dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer: effects on health-related quality of life

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of different treatments on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of men with localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 1997 and August 2002, 182 men diagnosed with prostate cancer (T1c to T3bN0M0) had radical prostatectomy (RP, 89) or (192)iridium high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT, 93) with external beam radiotherapy, and were followed for > or = 6 months. A postal survey was sent in which HRQoL was assessed using the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) QoL questionnaire, and disease-specific QoL using the University of California Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA-PCI). RESULTS: Questionnaire responses were obtained from 151 of 182 patients; there was no significant difference in SF-36 scale scores between men treated with RP or HDR-BT. In the UCLA-PCI, the HDR-BT group had better urinary function (P < 0.001) and sexual function scores (P= 0.043). Men treated with RP had better bowel bother scores (P = 0.027). In patients with > or = 2 years of follow-up, urinary function (P < 0.001) and sexual bother (P = 0.029) were better for men treated with HDR-BT than for men treated with RP. Men treated with HDR-BT had significantly better urinary function (P = 0.009) and sexual bother (P = 0.013) even than 30 men treated with unilateral nerve-sparing RP. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of HRQoL, RP and HDR-BT did not differ, but HDR-BT resulted in better urinary and sexual function than RP. When planning treatment, QoL concerns, including mental health issues associated with prostate cancer, need to be addressed with the patients, as do the potential side-effects.     

Salvage radical prostatectomy: quality of life outcomes and long-term oncological control of radiorecurrent prostate cancer

PURPOSE: We review our 20-year experience with salvage radical prostatectomy to determine prognostic variables predictive of oncological control of radiorecurrent prostate cancer. Using a standardized questionnaire we also evaluate outcome data regarding the long-term sexual and urinary effects of salvage radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1983 and 2002 salvage radical prostatectomy was performed in 51 patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer following definitive radiotherapy. Clinical information was obtained from a prospective database. Quality of life data were collected using the UCLA Prostate Cancer Index, a validated, patient administered instrument. RESULTS: At 5 years 47% of patients were progression-free without androgen deprivation therapy. Among patients with pT2 disease 100% were progression-free at 5 years, compared with 35% of patients with pT3N0 disease or higher and 0% of patients with node positive (pTxN+) disease (p < 0.001). Preoperative PSA 5.0 ng/ml or less was predictive of organ confined disease, and strongly associated with prolonged progression-free and overall survival (p < 0.001 and 0.01, respectively). Mean urinary function scores for patients with or without an artificial urinary sphincter compared favorably with scores reported after standard, nonsalvage prostatectomy. Sexual dysfunction was nearly uniform in patients undergoing standard salvage radical prostatectomy but implantation of a penile prosthesis was associated with a clinically significant improvement in sexual function. CONCLUSIONS: When initiated early in the course of recurrent disease, salvage radical prostatectomy provides excellent oncological control of radiorecurrent prostate cancer without the need for androgen ablation. Implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter and inflatable penile prosthesis devices in patients with postoperative urinary incontinence or erectile dysfunction results in significantly improved quality of life parameters.     

Urinary fistulas following external radiation or permanent brachytherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer

PURPOSE: Prostate cancer (PCa) radiotherapy (RT), including brachytherapy, may lead to significant morbidity, including urinary fistulas. If conservative measures fail, urinary and/or fecal diversion is often required. In this study we examined a series of patients with fistulas that developed after pelvic radiation therapy and explored potential predisposing factors and treatment recommendations for refractory fistulas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were identified who received radiation therapy for PCa between 1977 and 2002, and subsequently had a fistula to the urinary tract. Patients were excluded who had diverticulitis, inflammatory bowel disease, a history of recent radical retropubic prostatectomy (possible iatrogenic etiology) or cancer in the excised fistula. Data were extracted from patient charts, mailed questionnaires and outside records. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients were identified with a history of radiation for PCa who subsequently had a urinary fistula. Of 20 patients meeting inclusion criteria 30% received external beam RT alone, 30% received brachytherapy and 40% received combined external beam RT/brachytherapy. Most fistulas (80%) were from the rectum to the urinary tract with an average diameter of 3.2 cm. Of patients with rectal fistulas 81% had a history of rectal stricture, urethral stricture, rectal biopsy, rectal argon beam therapy or transurethral prostate resection after radiation. All patients with rectourethral fistulas who achieved symptomatic resolution required urinary and fecal diversion. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative treatment is generally ineffective in the management of large urinary fistulas. Surgical intervention offers symptomatic relief and improved quality of life in most patients.     

Radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer provides durable cancer control with excellent quality of life: a structured debate

PURPOSE: To cure localized prostate cancer, the entire prostate must be eliminated, which is what all forms of treatment must achieve. Although there is no better way to cure localized disease than total surgical removal, the challenge is whether this can be accomplished with acceptable morbidity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To evaluate quality of life following radical retropubic prostatectomy, patient reported outcomes of 62 men who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy at this institution were recorded during the first 18 months of followup. By 18 months 93% of the patients were dry (wearing no pads) and 93% to 98% characterized urinary bothersomeness as none or small. Potency, defined as the ability to achieve unassisted intercourse with or without the use of sildenafil, improved gradually and by 18 months 86% of the patients were potent and 84% considered sexual bothersomeness as none or small. In an effort to improve the outcome of radical prostatectomy, the surgical procedures on these 62 patients were videotaped prospectively. The videotapes were reviewed 18 months after the study was initiated and 4 specific steps in the surgical procedure were correlated with patient reported outcomes. Surgeons who wish to improve their outcomes should consider using this technique to identify in their own hands other important arbitrary variations that may improve results. RESULTS: The probability of maintaining an undetectable prostate specific antigen was evaluated in men with similar pathological stages of disease who were or were not potent following surgery. Men who were potent had the same outcome as those who were impotent, supporting the premise that preservation of sexual function does not compromise cancer control. Cancer control and quality of life following brachytherapy were analyzed and the following conclusions were made: 1) high dose intensification is necessary if radiation therapy is expected to cure prostate cancer but I doubt that any form of radiotherapy will produce durable cancer control for 20 to 30 years; 2) although brachytherapy is rarely adequate as monotherapy, I am not certain that brachytherapy combined with external beam radiotherapy is any better than 3-dimensional conformal therapy alone and the side effects are uncertain, and 3) I believe that a prostate specific antigen nadir of less than 0.2 ng./ml. is necessary to confirm an adequate response to radiation. CONCLUSIONS: I believe that there is no better way to cure organ confined cancer than total surgical removal. Today continence and potency rates should be high. If not, a review of intraoperative videotapes of successful and unsuccessful cases can improve results. In men treated with radiotherapy stringent criteria for treatment response and quality of life outcomes are needed.     

Salvage-radikale Prostatektomie

BACKGROUND: Following external beam radiation and interstitial radiation for prostate cancer, between 30% and 50% of the patients experience locoregional recurrence of their cancer. Although radical salvage prostatectomy is a secondary treatment option with curative intent, so far only a few hundred patients (<2%) worldwide have undergone this operation. The subject of this paper is a review of the world literature with reference to the frequency with this operation is performed and the technique, and also the prospects of success and possible complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After radiotherapy, approximately 30% of biopsies are positive. Nonetheless, only 536 cases of salvage radical prostatectomy had been reported in the world literature up to 2005. The diagnosis of a local recurrence was always confirmed by rectal punch biopsy, pelvic CT and bone scintigraphy. Salvage radical prostatectomy with or without nerve sparing, with pelvic lymphadenectomy and, in some patients with cystectomy plus urinary diversion was the operative treatment applied. RESULTS: Following secondary treatment after radiotherapy (RT), three parameters have been consistently identified as predictors of local failure: PSA nadir, time to nadir and PSA doubling time; clinical stage and type of first-line treatment are not helpful in predicting failure. The 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival rates are 77%, 71% and 28% for stages pT2, pT3a and pT3b/pN1, respectively. The success rate for salvage radical prostatectomy is thus similar to that for de novo radical prostatectomy for the same stages. In the past salvage radical prostatectomy following radiotherapy had a high complication rate. CONCLUSIONS: A salvage radical prostatectomy with curative intent is a radical prostatectomy following radiotherapy also performed with curative intent. The reasons for the few literature reports of salvage RPX are: (1) oncological misgivings (too long a period of observation of PSA by the radiation oncologist/urologist; (2) misgivings to do with surgical technique, as the operation is technically challenging and involves a high risk of complications, especially incontinence. In recent times the comorbidity rate has become acceptable in cases in which the indications have been correctly observed. We believe that salvage prostatectomy should be considered only for patients in good general health whose life expectancy is over 10 years and who have recurrent cancer confirmed by punch biopsy 1 year or longer after the completion of radiotherapy and whose cancer was initially in an early (T1-2) clinical stage before their radiotherapy. Ideally, serum PSA should be less than 10 ng/ml both initially (before radiotherapy) and before salvage surgery. In addition, patients should be highly motivated and able to accept the surgical morbidity (50% incontinence rate).