乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检研究进展

在乳腺癌的外科治疗中，不论是改良根治还是保留乳房治疗，都要常规进行腋窝淋巴结清扫，以获得肿瘤分期资料从而指导下一步治疗，但腋窝淋巴结清扫会带来许多并发症，如上肢水肿和功能障碍、皮下积液、刀口愈合不良等，为了避免这些并发症，又能进行准确的分期，前哨淋巴结(setinel lymph node，SLN)活检技术应运而生，它具有操作简     

美蓝染色法检测乳腺癌前哨淋巴结的临床研究

目的 寻找检测乳腺癌前哨淋巴结(SLN)方法，研究前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)预测腋窝淋巴结状况的准确性。方法 对40例乳腺癌患者行美蓝染色法检测SLN，并行腋窝淋巴结清扫术(ALND)后，将腋窝淋巴结转移状况与SLN进行对比分析，分析SLN检出率及临床特征。结果 40例患者中成功检测出SLN35例，成功率为87．5％。检出SLN60个，平均每例检出SLNl．7个。2例出现假阴性，假阴性率为10.5％，无假阳性。35例患者中有16例SLN阳性，阳性率为45.7％。SLNB预测腋窝淋巴结(ALN)的敏感性为88．8％，特异性为100％，准确性为94．4％。结论 美蓝染色法检测乳腺癌SLN经济实用，可以较准确地预测腋窝淋巴结的转移状况。     

乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的研究进展

目的总结乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检（SLNB）的研究现状和进展。方法复习近年来国内外的相关文献,对乳腺癌SLNB的概念、适应证、活检技术、提高检出准确率的方法、病理学检查方法、转移灶类型、临床应用等进行综述。结果 SLNB的适应证在不断扩大。示踪剂、影像学检查和病理学检查技术的发展有助于对乳腺癌前哨淋巴结（SLN）状态的评估。乳腺癌SLNB的操作方法还没有统一的标准,对其能否指导选择性的腋窝淋巴结清扫的争议较大,且SLNB的SLN检出率及假阴性率变化范围较大。结论 SLNB已成为乳腺癌外科治疗的重要辅助手段,但其操作尚需进一步规范,其临床应用范围还需要大量前瞻性、多中心的随机试验进一步论证。     

腋窝淋巴结清扫术治疗前哨淋巴结活检阴性乳腺癌的系统评价

目的系统评价腋窝淋巴结清扫术治疗前哨淋巴结活检阴性乳腺癌的有效性和安全性。方法检索CNKI、PubMed、EMBASE、CBM从建库至2013年12月1日的文献资料,选择腋窝淋巴结清扫术和前哨淋巴结活检术治疗乳腺癌患者的试验,严格按照制订纳入和排除标准对纳入的研究进行筛选、资料提取、质量评价和结果分析。使用Revman 5.1软件,进行统计学分析(Meta-分析)。结果最终纳入10篇文献,患者共7731例。因纳入文献在研究类型、测量指标、随访时间以及统计学指标的差异较大,采用亚组分析,Meta分析同质研究,其余采用定性的描述性分析。本研究结果显示,在无病生存率、总体生存率、局部复发率、远处转移率方面,不同随访时间腋窝淋巴结清扫术与前哨淋巴结切除术间差异均无统计学意义。结论对于单发浸润性乳腺癌患者前哨淋巴结活检呈阴性时,可不必行腋窝淋巴结清扫术。目前尚需相关高质量随机对照试验和长期的随访进一步证实此系统评价的结论。     

乳晕下亚甲蓝法乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检术169例应用报告

目的探讨乳晕下注射亚甲蓝示踪法进行前哨淋巴结活检术(sentinel lymph node biopsy,SLNB)在乳腺癌治疗中的意义。方法 2005年1月～2010年3月,对169例(年龄33～70岁,中位年龄45岁)临床腋窝淋巴结阴性的乳腺癌术中乳晕下注射亚甲蓝2 ml行SLNB。SLN病理为阴性的患者,SLNB替代腋窝淋巴结清扫术。结果 163例(96.4%)成功实施SLNB,6例(3.6%)术中未能发现SLN,立即改行腋窝淋巴结清扫术(axillary lymph node dissection,ALND)。行SLNB的163例中,23例术中冰冻报告SLN癌转移,即行ALND;140例冰冻切片检查SLN未见癌转移。6例术后HE染色检查发现SLN存在1枚微转移淋巴结,5例接受ALND,1例拒绝行腋窝淋巴结清扫。135例SLNB代替ALND者中位随访时间16个月(3～62个月),均未发现腋窝淋巴结转移。结论亚甲蓝法SLNB安全、有效、简便易行,SLNB阴性的患者,可以替代ALND。     

前哨淋巴结活检在早期乳腺癌治疗中的临床价值

目的探讨前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)术在早期乳腺癌治疗中的临床价值。方法选取2014-09—2016-08间收治的78例乳腺癌患者,根据术式不同分为2组。均先实施患侧腋窝SLNB清扫切除、快速冰冻病理学检查。观察组(35例)病理检查结果示SLNB阴性,随给予单纯乳房切除术。对照组(43例)病理检查结果示SLNB阳性,行保留胸大、小肌的乳腺癌改良根治术。术后随访6个月,比较2组患者患侧上肢的功能。结果末次随访,2组患者患侧上肢的麻木、疼痛感比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05);但观察组患者患侧上肢水肿及肩关节活动障碍的发生率均显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论对SLNB病理检查阴性的早期乳腺癌患者实施单纯乳房切除和SLNB清扫切除术,操作简便、创伤较小、并发症少,而且对患侧肩关节功能影响较小。     

乳腺癌非前哨淋巴结转移的危险因素研究

目的:探讨腋窝前哨淋巴结(SLN)阳性的乳腺癌患者非前哨淋巴结(NSLN)转移的影响因素,并对美国纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心(MSKCC)预测模型的临床应用价值进行验证。方法:收集山西白求恩医院乳腺外科2012年3月至2019年9月142例SLN阳性临床早期乳腺癌,Logistic回归分析NSLN阳性组和阴性组间各临床病...     

乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检研究现状及进展

目的探讨乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)技术的研究现状和进展。方法复习近年来国内、外的有关文献,对乳腺癌SLNB的定位、检取、状态评估、适应证和并发症进行分析与综述。结果乳腺癌SLNB能够准确定位、检取前哨淋巴结(SLN)。影像学检查和病理检测技术的发展有助于SLN状态的评估,SLNB的适应证正在不断扩大。该技术并发症少,能够准确判定腋窝分期,指导选择性的腋窝淋巴结清扫。结论 SLNB技术已成为乳腺癌外科治疗的重要手段,但其操作尚需进一步规范,以降低假阴性的发生;假阳性和有争议的适应证问题仍需继续关注。     

Sentinel Lymph Node Pressure in Breast Cancer

Background  

Leakiness of angiogenic tumor vessels results in elevated pressure in primary breast cancers and increased lymphatic flow to sentinel lymph node(s) (SLNs). We hypothesized that a similar pathophysiology in metastatic axillary SLNs would result in increased intranodal pressure (INP).     

Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Microinvasive Breast Cancer

Background:Ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCISM) is a separate pathological entity, distinct from pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). DCISM is a true invasive breast carcinoma with a well-known metastatic potential. Currently, there is controversy regarding the indication for complete axillary dissection (CAD) to stage the axilla in patients with DCISM. The role of CAD is questioned given its morbidity and reported low incidence of axillary involvement. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) may obviate the need for CAD in these patients without compromising the staging of the axilla and the important prognostic information.Methods:From March 1996 to December 2002, 4602 consecutive patients with invasive breast carcinoma underwent SLN biopsy. Of these, 41 patients with DCISM were selected.Results:Metastasis in the SLN were detected in 4 of 41 (9.7%) patients. Two of the 4 patients had only micrometastasis in the SLN. In three patients, the SLN was the only positive node after CAD.Conclusions:SLN biopsy should be considered as a standard procedure in DCISM patients. SLNB can detect nodal micrometastasis and accurately stage the axilla avoiding the morbidity of a CAD. Complete AD may not be mandatory if only the SLN contains micrometastatic disease. Informed consent is very important in the decision not to undergo CAD.     

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Breast Cancer

The role of axillary surgery for the treatment of primary breast cancer is in a process of constant change. During the last decade, axillary dissection with removal of at least 10 lymph nodes (ALD) was replaced by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as a staging procedure. Since then, the indication for SLNB rapidly expanded. Today's surgical strategies aim to minimize the rate of patients with a negative axillary status who undergo ALD. For some subgroups of patients, the indication for SLNB (e.g. multicentric disease, large tumors) or its implication for treatment planning (micrometastatic involvement, neoadjuvant chemotherapy) is being discussed. Although the indication for ALD is almost entirely restricted to patients with positive axillary lymph nodes today, the therapeutic effect of completion ALD is more and more questioned. On the other hand, the diagnostic value of ALD in node-positive patients is discussed. This article reflects today's standards in axillary surgery and discusses open issues on the diagnostic and therapeutic role of SLNB and ALD in the treatment of early breast cancer.     

Pathologic Examination of Sentinel Lymph Node for Breast Carcinoma

Comprehensive pathologic evaluation of the sentinel lymph node using step sections and cytokeratin immunohistochemistry enhances detection of micrometastases and optimizes the staging of breast carcinoma. This review discusses our current understanding of the pathologic and molecular techniques for sentinel node examination.     

临床腋淋巴结阴性乳腺癌前哨淋巴结研究

目的：探讨前哨淋巴结活检术（ｓｅｎｔｉｎｅｌ ｌｙｍｐｈ ｎｏｄｅ ｂｉｏｐｓｙ, ＳＬＮＢ）在乳腺癌治疗中的应用。方法：使用专利蓝和美蓝染色,对１９９９年９月～２００１年４月连续收治的１４５例临床查体腋窝淋巴结阴性乳腺癌病人行前哨淋巴结活检术。结果：ＳＬＮＢ成功率为９６．５％（１４０／１４５）,假阴性率为２３．５％,准确率为９１．４％。病人年龄、肿瘤最大径、肿瘤部位、注射染料类型及是否活检对成功率和假阴性率无影响。结论：ＳＬＮＢ能够准确预测腋窝淋巴结的转移状况,在缩小手术范围、减少术后并发症的同时,提高了腋窝淋巴结分期的准确性;美蓝与专利蓝均可成功确定ＳＬＮ。     

乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的研究进展

目的 报道乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的研究进展。方法 采用文献回顾的方法，对国外乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的历史、概念、活检技术以及临床应用等问题进行综述。结果 乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的操作方法还没有统一的标准，检出率及假阴性率变化范围广。结论 前哨淋巴结活检的临床应用还需要大量前瞻性多中心随机实验结果进一步论证。     

Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection in Locally Recurrent Breast Cancer

Annals of Surgical Oncology - The aim of this study was to investigate the use of sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) in the treatment of patients with locally recurrent breast cancer. A total of...     

Second Biopsy of Axillary Sentinel Lymph Node for Reappearing Breast Cancer After Previous Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

Background Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a safe and accurate axillary staging procedure for patients with primary operable breast cancer. An increasing proportion of these patients undergo breast-conserving surgery, and 5% to 15% will develop local relapses that necessitate reoperation. Although a previous SLNB is often considered a contraindication for a subsequent SLNB, few data support this concern. Methods Between January 2000 and June 2004, 79 patients who were previously treated at our institution with breast-conserving surgery and who had a negative SLNB for early breast cancer developed, during follow-up, local recurrence that was amenable to reoperation. Eighteen of these patients were offered a second SLNB because of a clinically negative axillary status an average of 26.1 months after the primary event. Results In all 18 patients (7 with ductal carcinoma-in-situ and 11 with invasive recurrences), preoperative lymphoscintigraphy showed an axillary sentinel lymph node, with a preoperative identification rate of 100%, and 1 or more SLNs (an average of 1.3 per patient) were surgically removed. Sentinel lymph node metastases were detected in two patients with invasive recurrence, and a complete axillary dissection followed. At a median follow up of 12.7 months, no axillary recurrences have occurred in patients who did not undergo axillary dissection. Conclusions Second SLNB after previous SLNB is technically feasible and likely effective in selected breast cancer patients. A larger population and longer follow-up are necessary to confirm these preliminary data.     

Clinical and Pathological Factors Affecting the Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Breast Cancer

Sentinel lymph node biopsy has become the routine procedure in axilla-negative breast cancer patients at most medical centers for axillary staging and local control in the recent years. Sentinel lymph node is the only focus in axillary lymph metastasis in a large portion of patients. In our trial, we investigated the clinical and pathological factors that affect the positive status of sentinel lymph node. We included 89 patients, who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with methylene blue and/or technetium-99 m Sulphur Colloid due to early-stage breast cancer. Five patients, in whom SLN was not detected and who underwent axillary dissection, were excluded from the trial. The patient age, location of the tumor, the type of the tumor, the T stage by the TNM staging system, the histological grade and type of the tumor, the status of multifocality, the lymphovascular invasion status of the tumor, and the ER, PR, and HER-neu2 status were recorded. The median age of the 89 patients was 52, 9 (±10) years. Fifty-seven (64 %) and 32 (36 %) of the 89 patients were detected to have positive and negative SLN, respectively. Assessing the SLNB positivity and the patient age, tumor size, tumor grade, multifocality, tumor localization, the T stage by the TNM staging, the ER/PR positivity/negativity, and the HER/neu2 and p53 status, the data revealed no statistically significant results with respect to SLN metastasis. The lymphovascular invasion status (LVI) was observed to statistically affect the SLN positivity (p?<?0.016). We showed that LVI could be an important marker in predicting the SLN positivity in patients with axilla-negative early-stage breast cancer. In the future, upon introduction of new biomarkers and with relevant studies, it may be possible to predict the SLNB status of patients at an adequately high accuracy and a low risk.