Association between dyslipidemia and antihypertensive and antidiabetic treatments in a China multicenter study

Dyslipidemia is an emerging disease in China, especially in the presence of hypertension and diabetes mellitus. We investigated the association of dyslipidemia with the use of antihypertensive and antidiabetic agents. The study participants (n = 2423) were hypertensive and diabetic patients enrolled in a China nationwide registry. Serum mean ± (SD, except for serum triglycerides, median [interquatile range]) concentrations were 1.38 (0.97‐2.02) mmol/L, 4.85 ± 1.12 mmol/L, 1.30 ± 0.36 mmol/L, and 2.89 ± 0.92 mmol/L for triglycerides and total, high‐density lipoprotein (HDL), and low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, respectively. The prevalence of dyslipidemia was 18.9%, 13.5%, 16.6%, and 37.7% for hypertriglyceridemia (serum triglycerides ≥2.3 mmol/L), hypercholesterolemia (total cholesterol ≥6.2 mmol/L or LDL cholesterol ≥4.1 mmol/L), low HDL cholesterol (HDL cholesterol <1.0 mmol/L), and any of the three lipid disorders, respectively. Treated (n = 1647), compared with untreated hypertensive patients (n = 303), had a significantly (P ≤ .0006) lower serum total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol, but similar serum triglycerides (P = .20). Treated (n = 1325), compared with untreated diabetic patients (n = 238), had a significantly (P ≤ .004) lower serum triglycerides, and total and LDL cholesterol, but similar serum HDL cholesterol (P = .81). After adjustment, the odds ratios (OR) were significant for hypercholesterolemia (OR 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58‐0.997, P = .048) and low HDL cholesterol (OR 1.56, CI 1.19‐2.03, P = .001) in treated versus untreated hypertension, and for low HDL cholesterol (OR 1.50, CI 1.18‐1.89, P = .0008) in treated versus untreated diabetes. In conclusion, the prevalence of dyslipidemia differed between treated and untreated hypertension and diabetes.     

The possibility that long‐term isometric handgrip exercise contributes to left atrial enlargement in patients with hypertension

Hypertension guidelines recommend isometric handgrip exercise (IHG) as a non‐pharmacological treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate whether IHG is safe for hypertensive patients. The participants were mostly middle‐aged to elderly patients with hypertension. Participants wore a pedometer for 4 weeks and were then divided into two groups: Those who had taken at least 7000 steps per day were placed in an IHG‐only group (n = 11), and those who took fewer steps were placed in an IHG + walking group (n = 4). Both groups then performed IHG for 12 weeks. No significant blood pressure reduction occurred from before to after intervention in either group. In the IHG‐only group, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) was significantly higher and left atrial (LA) volume (24.6 ± 9.1 to 36.4 ± 17.9 mL, P = .007) was significantly larger after intervention than before. Long‐term IHG may induce both LA enlargement and increased BNP in hypertensive patients.     

Evaluation of serum magnesium differences in hypertensive crises and control patients: A randomly matched case‐control study

Although the role of magnesium in blood pressure has been well studied among hypertensive patients, no study has explored the role of magnesium in hypertensive crises. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the differences in serum magnesium levels between hypertensive crises patients and matched controls (age‐, sex‐, race‐, and diabetes‐matched) in a 1:1 random match. This study is a single‐center, retrospective, chart review, case‐control study of patients with hypertensive crises (case group) and patients without hypertensive crises (control group). Patients were included in the case group if they were 18 years of age or older with hypertensive crises and have a documented magnesium level. The control group patients were required to be 18 years of age or older, have no diagnosis of hypertensive crises, and have a documented magnesium level. The primary outcome of the study was to compare the mean serum magnesium in patients with hypertensive crises versus patients without hypertensive crises. Three hundred and fifty‐eight patients were included in the study: 179 patients in both the case group and control group. The primary outcome results showed that serum magnesium concentration was not significantly different between the case group (1.89 ± 0.29 mg/dl) and control group (1.90 ± 0.31 mg/dl) (p = .787). This study found no significant difference in serum magnesium levels in patients with hypertensive crises compared to a random matched control group. Larger observational or experimental studies may be useful to evaluate the effect of magnesium on blood pressure in hypertensive crises.     

Evaluation of serum calcium differences in hypertensive crises and control patients: A randomly matched case‐control study

The role of calcium in blood pressure has been widely studied among hypertensive patients; however, no study has explored the role of calcium in hypertensive crises. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the differences in serum calcium levels between hypertensive crises patients and a 1:1 random matched controls (age‐, sex‐, race‐, diabetes, and body mass index matched). This study is a single‐center, retrospective, chart review, case‐control study of patients with hypertensive crises (case group) and patients without hypertensive crises (control group). Patients were included in the case group if they were 18 years of age or older with hypertensive crises and have a documented calcium level. The control group patients were required to be 18 years of age or older, have a documented calcium level, and have no diagnosis of hypertensive crises. The primary outcome of the study was to compare the mean serum calcium in patients with hypertensive crises vs patients without hypertensive crises. Five hundred and sixty‐six patients were included in the study: 283 patients in both the case group and control group. The primary outcome results showed that serum calcium concentration was not significantly different between the case group (8.99 ± 0.78 mg/dL) and control group (8.96 ± 0.75 mg/dL) (P = .606). This study found no significant difference in serum calcium levels in patients with hypertensive crises compared to a random matched control group. Larger observational or experimental studies may be useful to evaluate the effect of calcium on blood pressure in hypertensive crises.     

Prognostic implications of biventricular strain measurement in COVID‐19 patients by speckle‐tracking echocardiography

BackgroundRecent reports have indicated the beneficial role of strain measurement in COVID‐19 patients.HypothesisTo determine the association between right and left global longitudinal strain (RVGLS, LVGLS) and COVID‐19 patients'' outcomes.MethodsHospitalized COVID‐19 patients between June and August 2020 were included. Two‐dimensional echocardiography and biventricular global longitudinal strain measurement were performed. The outcome measure was defined as mortality, ICU admission, and need for intubation. Appropriate statistical tests were used to compare different groups.ResultsIn this study 207 patients (88 females) were enrolled. During 64 ± 4 days of follow‐up, 22 (10.6%) patients died. Mortality, ICU admission, and intubation were significantly associated with LVGLS and RVGLS tertiles. LVGLS tertiles could predict poor outcome with significant odds ratios in the total population (OR = 0.203, 95% CI: 0.088–0.465; OR = 0.350, 95% CI: 0.210–0.585; OR = 0.354, 95% CI: 0.170–0.736 for mortality, ICU admission, and intubation). Although odds ratios of LVGLS for the prediction of outcome were statistically significant among hypertensive patients, these odds ratios did not reach significance among non‐hypertensive patients. RVGLS tertiles revealed significant odds ratios for the prediction of mortality (OR = 0.322, 95% CI: 0.162–0.640), ICU admission (OR = 0.287, 95% CI: 0.166–0.495), and need for intubation (OR = 0.360, 95% CI: 0.174–0.744). Odds ratios of RVGLS remained significant even after adjusting for hypertension when considering mortality and ICU admission.ConclusionRVGLS and LVGLS can be acceptable prognostic factors to predict mortality, ICU admission, and intubation in hospitalized COVID‐19 patients. However, RVGLS seems more reliable, as it is not confounded by hypertension.     

Prediction of cardiovascular events using brachial‐ankle pulse wave velocity in hypertensive patients

The prognostic value of arterial stiffness in Korean hypertensive patients has not been specified. This study was performed to evaluate the prognostic value of brachial‐ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) in Korean hypertensive patients and to propose a cutoff value of baPWV predicting future cardiovascular events. A total of 2561 hypertensive patients without documented cardiovascular disease (mean age, 63 years; 47% females) who underwent baPWV measurement were retrospectively analyzed. Composite events of cardiac death, non‐fatal myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, and ischemic stroke were assessed during the clinical follow‐up period. During a median follow‐up period of 4.14 years (interquartile range, 2.18‐5.48 years), there were 69 cases of composite events (2.7%). In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the best cutoff value of baPWV predicting composite events was 1630 cm/s (sensitivity, 79.7%; specificity, 49.1%; area under curve, 0.674; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.613‐0.735; P < .001). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, higher baPWV (≥1630 cm/s) was independently associated with higher risk of the occurrence of composite events even after controlling for potential confounders (hazard ratio, 2.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.49‐5.36; P = .001). In conclusion, increased baPWV in Korean hypertensive patients was associated with an increased risk of future cardiovascular events. In addition, we suggested 1630 cm as a cutoff value of baPWV for predicting cardiovascular events, which will be helpful in guiding the treatment strategy of Korean hypertensive patients.     

Sex‐related associations of high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol with aortic stiffness and endothelial glycocalyx integrity in treated hypertensive patients

Smoking, a well‐recognized major cardiovascular (CV) risk factor, impairs endothelial function and increases aortic stiffness which indicates subclinical organ damage in hypertensive patients. Loss of endothelial glycocalyx (EG) integrity, as part of the endothelium, represents endothelial dysfunction. The authors aimed to investigate the role of increased HDL cholesterol levels (HDL‐C), which usually are considered protective against CV disease, in aortic stiffness and endothelial integrity in middle‐aged treated hypertensive patients regarding smoking habit. The authors studied 193 treated hypertensive patients ≥40 years (mean age = 61±11 years, 58% females), divided in four groups regarding sex and smoking. Increased perfusion boundary region of the 5‐9 μm diameter sublingual arterial microvessels (PBR_5‐9) was measured as a noninvasive accurate index of reduced EG thickness. Aortic stiffness was estimated by carotid‐femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV). In the whole population, an inverse weak relationship was found between HDL‐C and PWV (r = −.15, P = .03) and PBR_5‐9 (ρ = −.15, P = .03). Moreover, HDL‐C was negatively related to PBR_5‐9 in males (r = −.29, P = .008) either smokers (r = −.35, P < .05) or non‐smokers (r = −.27, P < .05) and PWV in female non‐smokers (r = −.28, P = .009). In a multiple linear regression analysis, using age, weight, smoking, HDL‐C, and LDL‐C as independent variables, we found that HDL‐C independently predicts PWV in the whole population (β = −.14, P = .02) and PBR_5‐9 in male hypertensive patients (β = −.28, P = .01). Higher HDL‐C levels are associated with reduced aortic stiffness in hypertensive patients, while they protect EG and subsequently endothelial function in middle‐aged, treated hypertensive male patients (either smokers or not).     

Effect of electrical cardioversion on 1‐year outcomes in patients with early recurrence after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence is common in the 3‐month blanking‐period after catheter ablation, during which electrical cardioversion (ECV) is usually performed to restore sinus rhythm. Whether ECV can affect the clinical outcome of post‐ablation AF patients is inconsistent, however. We aimed to explore the 1‐year effect of ECV on AF recurrence and rehospitalization in patients experienced recurrence within 3‐month after AF catheter ablation.MethodsPatients who experienced recurrence within 3‐month after AF catheter ablation procedure were enrolled from the China Atrial Fibrillation Registry (China‐AF). A 1:3 Propensity score matching (PSM) method was applying to adjust the confounders between patients who had been treated by ECV or not. Logistic regression models were conducted to evaluate the association of ECV with 1‐year AF recurrence and rehospitalization.ResultsIn this study, 2961 patients experienced AF recurrence within 3‐month after the procedure, and 282 of them underwent successful ECV, 2155 patients did not undergo ECV. One‐year AF recurrence rates were 56.4% in ECV group versus 65.4% in non‐ECV group (p = .003), and were 55.9% versus 65.9%, respectively, after PSM (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49–0.88, p = .005). However, the difference of 1‐year rehospitalization rates between two groups were not statistically significant before (ECV group: 23.7% vs. non‐ECV group: 22.3%, p = .595) and after PSM (ECV group: 24.4% vs. non‐ECV group: 21.6%, adjusted OR1.14; 95% CI 0.81–1.62, p = .451).ConclusionsSuccessful ECV was associated with lower rate of one‐year recurrence in patients with early recurrent AF after catheter ablation.     

Angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors increase anti‐fibrotic biomarkers in African Americans with left ventricular hypertrophy

Angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) are part of the indicated treatment in hypertensive African Americans. ACEi have blood pressure‐independent effects that may make them preferred for certain patients. We aimed to evaluate the impact of ACEi on anti‐fibrotic biomarkers in African American hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). We conducted a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial in which hypertensive African American patients with LVH and vitamin D deficiency were randomized to receive intensive antihypertensive therapy plus vitamin D supplementation or placebo. We selected patients who had detectable lisinopril (lisinopril group) in plasma using liquid‐chromatography/mass spectrometry analysis and compared them to subjects who did not (comparison group) at the one‐year follow‐up. The pro‐fibrotic marker type 1 procollagen C‐terminal propeptide (PICP) and the anti‐fibrotic markers matrix metalloproteinase‐1 (MMP‐1), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 (TIMP‐1), telopeptide of collagen type I (CITP), and N‐acetyl‐seryl‐aspartyl‐lysyl‐proline (Ac‐SDKP) peptide were measured. Sixty‐six patients were included, and the mean age was 46.2 ± 8 years. No difference was observed in the number and intensity of antihypertensive medications prescribed in each group. Patients with detectable lisinopril had lower blood pressure than those in the comparison group. The anti‐fibrotic markers Ac‐SDKP, MMP‐1, and MMP‐1/TIMP‐1 ratio were higher in patients with detectable ACEi (all p < .05). In a model adjusted for systolic blood pressure, MMP‐1/TIMP‐1 (p = .02) and Ac‐SDKP (p < .001) levels were associated with lisinopril. We conclude that ACEi increase anti‐fibrotic biomarkers in hypertensive African Americans with LVH, suggesting that they may offer added benefit over other agents in such patients.     

Ambulatory blood pressure phenotypes and isolated elevation of office central or brachial blood pressure

Disagreements in office brachial and central blood pressure (BP) have resulted in the identification of novel hypertension phenotypes, namely isolated central hypertension (ICH) and isolated brachial hypertension (IBH). This study investigated the relationship of ICH and IBH with ambulatory BP phenotypes among 753 individuals (mean age = 47.6 ± 15.2 years, 48% males) who underwent office and 24‐hours brachial and central BP measures using a Mobil‐O‐Graph PWA monitor. Thresholds for elevated office central and brachial BP were 130/90 and 140/90 mm Hg. Results of multivariable analysis adjusted for potential confounders showed that ICH (n = 25) had 3.71‐fold (95% CI 1.48‐9.32; P = .005) greater risk of masked hypertension than normal brachial/central BP (n = 362), while IBH (n = 20) had 4.65‐fold (95% CI 1.76‐12.25; P = .002) greater risk of white coat hypertension compared with combined brachial/central hypertension (n = 346). These findings suggest that the diagnosis of ICH and IBH might be useful in identifying individuals at higher risk of presenting discordant office and ambulatory BP phenotypes.     

Assessment of suitable antihypertensive therapies: Combination with high‐dose amlodipine/irbesartan vs triple combination with amlodipine/irbesartan/indapamide (ASAHI‐AI study)

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) plus calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are a widely used combination therapy for hypertensive patients. In order to determine which combination was better as the next‐step therapy for standard‐dose combination of ARBs and CCBs, a combination with high‐dose CCBs or a triple combination with diuretics, the authors conducted a prospective, randomized, open‐label trial to determine which of the following combination is better as the next‐step treatment: a combination with high‐dose CCBs or a triple combination with diuretics. Hypertensive outpatients who did not achieve their target blood pressure (BP) with usual dosages of ARBs and amlodipine 5 mg were randomly assigned to treatment with irbesartan 100 mg/amlodipine 10 mg (Group 1: n = 48) or indapamide 1 mg in addition to ARBs plus amlodipine 5 mg (Group 2: n = 46). The primary end point was changes in the systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) after the 12‐week treatment period, while secondary end points were changes in BP after the 24‐week treatment period and laboratory values. At 12 weeks, the SBP/DBP significantly decreased from 152.1/83.4 mm Hg to 131.5/76.1 mm Hg in Group 1 and 153.9/82.1 mm Hg to 132.7/75.9 mm Hg in Group 2. Although both groups produced a similar efficacy in reducing the SBP/DBP (−19.2/‐9.2 mm Hg in Group 1 and −21.6/‐8.8 mm Hg in Group 2; SBP P = .378, DBP P = .825), high‐dose CCBs combined with ARBs controlled hypertension without elevation of serum uric acid. These results will provide new evidence for selecting optimal combination therapies for uncontrolled hypertensive patients.     

Comparison of the efficiency between electrocardiogram and echocardiogram for left ventricular hypertrophy evaluation in patients with hypertension: Insight from the Korean Hypertension Cohort Study

In patients with hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) represents a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and asymptomatic organ damage. Currently, electrocardiography (ECG) and two‐dimensional echocardiography (Echo) are the most widely used methods for LVH evaluation. This study aimed to compare the long‐term outcomes of LVH, as evaluated by ECG and Echo, in patients with hypertension. Patients diagnosed with hypertension as a primary disease between 2006 and 2011 were enrolled in the Korean Hypertension Cohort study. The study finally included 1743 patients who underwent both ECG and Echo. The primary endpoint was defined as the composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) or death. Overall, LVH was identified in 747 patients. The patients were categorized into four groups according to the detection of LVH by ECG or Echo: No LVH (n = 996), LVH diagnosed by ECG alone (n = 181), LVH diagnosed by Echo alone (n = 415), LVH diagnosed by both ECG and Echo (n = 151). After adjusting for variables, the incidence of MACEs or death was significantly greater in patients with LVH diagnosed by ECG alone (hazards ratio [HR]: 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22–2.35; P = .001), LVH diagnosed by Echo alone (HR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.16–2.05; P = .002), and LVH diagnosed by both ECG and Echo (HR: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.18–2.94; P = .002) than in those with no LVH. Both ECG and Echo are efficient diagnostic tools for LVH and useful for long‐term risk stratification. Additional Echo evaluation for LVH is helpful for predicting long‐term outcomes only in patients without LVH diagnosis by ECG.     

Characteristics of hypertension and arterial stiffness in obstructive sleep apnea: A Scandinavian experience from a prospective study of 6408 normotensive and hypertensive patients

The impact of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on arterial stiffness is less studied. We aimed to investigate the prevalence and covariates of increased pulse pressure (PP), a surrogate marker of arterial stiffness, in the entire study population as well as in separate analyses in normotensive and hypertensive patients. Further, we also explored the impact of smoking on brachial BP in hypertensive patients. Between 2012 and 2019, a total of 6408 participants with suspected OSA underwent a standard out‐of‐center respiratory polygraphy. OSA was defined by an apnea‐hypopnea index (AHI) ≥15/h regardless of symptoms. PP ≥60 mmHg was used as a surrogate marker of increased arterial stiffness. Mean age was 49.3±13.7 years, 69.4% were male, and 34.5% had OSA. The prevalence of hypertension was 70.8% in OSA and 46.7% in No‐OSA (AHI < 15/h) controls (P < .0001). Hypertension was controlled (clinic BP < 140/90 mmHg) in 45.5% and uncontrolled in 54.5% (P < .001). Mean PP was 50±12 mmHg in smokers and 52±12 mmHg in non‐smokers (P = .001). Increased PP was found in 24.2% of the entire study population and was higher in patients with OSA compared to No‐OSA group (27.5% vs 22.4%, P < .0001). In an unadjusted logistic regression model, OSA was associated with a 1.3‐fold higher risk of having increased PP (95% CI 1.16‐1.48, P < .001). In a multivariable‐adjusted model, higher age, male sex, and history of hypertension, but not OSA (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.77‐1.02, P = .104) were associated with increased PP. In this large study of nearly 6500 participants who were referred with suspected OSA, one‐third were diagnosed with OSA and a quarter had increased arterial stiffness by elevated brachial PP. Hypertension but not OSA per se was associated with increased arterial stiffness. Hypertension was highly prevalent and poorly controlled.     

The value of ECG changes in risk stratification of COVID‐19 patients

BackgroundThere is growing evidence of cardiac injury in COVID‐19. Our purpose was to assess the prognostic value of serial electrocardiograms in COVID‐19 patients.MethodsWe evaluated 269 consecutive patients admitted to our center with confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. ECGs available at admission and after 1 week from hospitalization were assessed. We evaluated the correlation between ECGs findings and major adverse events (MAE) as the composite of intra‐hospital all‐cause mortality or need for invasive mechanical ventilation. Abnormal ECGs were defined if primary ST‐T segment alterations, left ventricular hypertrophy, tachy or bradyarrhythmias and any new AV, bundle blocks or significant morphology alterations (e.g., new Q pathological waves) were present.ResultsAbnormal ECG at admission (106/216) and elevated baseline troponin values were more common in patients who developed MAE (p = .04 and p = .02, respectively). Concerning ECGs recorded after 7 days (159), abnormal findings were reported in 53.5% of patients and they were more frequent in those with MAE (p = .001). Among abnormal ECGs, ischemic alterations and left ventricular hypertrophy were significantly associated with a higher MAE rate. The multivariable analysis showed that the presence of abnormal ECG at 7 days of hospitalization was an independent predictor of MAE (HR 3.2; 95% CI 1.2–8.7; p = .02). Furthermore, patients with abnormal ECG at 7 days more often required transfer to the intensive care unit (p = .01) or renal replacement therapy (p = .04).ConclusionsPatients with COVID‐19 should receive ECG at admission but also during their hospital stay. Indeed, electrocardiographic alterations during hospitalization are associated with MAE and infection severity.     

Association of urine albumin‐to‐creatinine ratio with subclinical systolic dysfunction in hypertensive patients but not normotensive subjects: Danyang study

The association of albuminuria, as measured by urine albumin‐to‐creatinine ratio (UACR) concentration, with subclinical cardiac dysfunction in hypertensive patients is unclear. Our study aimed to examine its relationship in hypertensive patients compared with that in normotensive patients. The study participants were recruited from Danyang, a city of Jiangsu Province from 2017 to 2019. Categorical and continuous analyses were performed with sex‐specific UACR tertiles and natural logarithmically transformed UACR, respectively. Comprehensive echocardiography including conventional imaging, tissue Doppler imaging, and 2D speckle tracking was performed using Philips CX50 device. The 2857 participants (mean age = 52.7 ± 11.8 years) included 1673 (58.6%) women, 1125 (39.4%) hypertensive patients, 546 (19.1%) patients with microalbuminuria, and 38 (1.3%) patients with macroalbuminuria. Comorbidities were increasingly prevalent across the tertiles of UACR. Increased left ventricular (LV) mass index, decreased global longitudinal strain (GLS) and LV ejection fraction, lower E/A ratio and e′ velocity, and higher E/e′ ratio were significantly associated with higher UACR on unadjusted analyses (p ≤ .01). After adjustment for covariates, UACR was only independently associated with lower GLS (tertile 3 = 20.7% vs. tertile 1 = 20.9%; p = .04). The results of hypertensive patients (p ≤ .04) but not normotensive patients (p ≥ .16) were similar to those of the total cohort. Subgroup analyses revealed similar results in patients without coronary artery disease, or without LV hypertrophy, or without diabetes. In conclusion, increased UACR is associated with worse subclinical systolic function in Chinese hypertensive patients but not in normotensive participants.     

Unobserved automated office BP is similar to other clinic BP measurements: A prospective randomized study

Results of the SPRINT study have been disputed, based on the assumption that unattended BP measurements do not correlate with usual BP measurements. In this study, the authors investigated the correlation of unattended SPRINT‐like measurements with other conventional measurements. All BP measurements were taken with the patient seated in a comfortable chair with the legs uncrossed and not speaking during the procedure. For the purpose of this study, sixty‐five patients, mostly male (93%), were recruited from our hypertension clinic and all were on antihypertensive medication (av 3.0 ± 1.1). Patients were at high cardiovascular risk with high rates of comorbidities, av age 68 ± 12 years, 49% with diabetes, 34% with mild CKD (CKD 1‐3, average eGFR 55.0 ± 13 mL/min/1.73 m²), and 20% with history of stable coronary artery disease. All BP measurements were similar with no statistically significant difference (one‐way ANOVA, P = 0.621). Compared to unattended SPRINT BP values (139.77 ± 19.22/75.42 ± 11.72 mm Hg), the clinic BP measurements were numerically slightly higher but with a NS P value (P = 0.163). Similarly, unattended BP measurements were similar to values taken by the clinic physician. In a smaller cohort of 11 patients, the authors compared unobserved vs observed SPRINT‐like BP measurements, and in 13 patients, the authors compared unobserved SPRINT‐like BP measurements to average home BP measurements (Table 3). There were no significant differences between any of the subgroups (one‐way ANOVA, P = 0.816 for systolic and P = 0.803 for diastolic). The authors conclude that unattended BP measurements taken (the SPRINT way) are similar to other conventional office blood pressure measurements.     

Evaluation of the association between admission systolic blood pressure and the choice of initial antiplatelet therapy for minor ischemic stroke in real‐world

To evaluate whether admission systolic blood pressure (SBP) is associated with the choice of initial antiplatelet therapy for minor stroke. Eligible patients retrospectively gathered from 2010 to 2018. Finally, 1312 of 1494 patients were divided into three groups: aspirin monotherapy (AM, n = 538, 41.0%), dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and load‐clopidogrel (clopidogrel loading dose of 300 mg on the first day, DAPT‐ALC, n = 474, 35.6%), and dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and unload‐clopidogrel (clopidogrel 75 mg daily with no loading dose, DAPT‐AUC, n = 300, 22.9%). The mean ± SD age of final patients was 62.0 ± 12.7 years old; 903 (70.9%) participants were male. Patients in the DAPT‐ALC group were more likely to be younger, to arrive earlier, and to have a lower proportion of intracerebral hemorrhage than those in the AM group. DAPT‐AUC group patients were more like to have a history of acute myocardial infarction and less likely to have a history of ICH than the AM group (4.7% vs. 1.7% and .3% vs. 2.6%, p < .05). Overall, there was a likely “S‐shaped” association between the selection of the DAPT‐ALC or DAPT‐AUC scheme and admission systolic blood pressure (P for nonlinearity = .012). Compared with the SBP < 140 mmHg group, the SBP ≥ 180 mmHg group was more likely to be given DAPT‐AUC (OR = 2.92 [1.62–5.26], p < .001) than DAPT‐ALC. Our findings support that admission SBP is associated with the choice of initial antiplatelet, especially when the SBP was greater than or equal to 180 mmHg.     

Interactions between hypertension and inflammatory tone and the effect on blood pressure and outcomes in patients with COVID‐19

Arterial hypertension represented one of the most common comorbidities in patients with COVID‐19. However, the impact of hypertension on outcome in COVID‐19 patients is not clear. Close connections between inflammation and blood pressure (BP) have been described, and inflammation plays a key role in the outcome for patients with COVID‐19. Whether hypertension impairs the relationship between inflammation, BP, and outcomes in this context is not known. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of the interactions between inflammation and hypertension status on BP and clinical outcome in patients hospitalized with COVID‐19. We designed a retrospective study in 129 patients hospitalized with COVID‐19 at Toulouse University Hospital. The hospital outcome was admission to the intensive care unit or death. The inflammatory markers were blood C‐reactive protein level (CRP), neutrophil to lymphocyte, and platelet to lymphocyte ratios. We identified strong correlations between CRP (P < .01) and the other inflammatory markers recorded on admission (P < .001) with mean BP within 3 days after admission in normotensive patients, whereas these correlations were absent in patients with hypertension. Also, we observed after multivariate adjustment (P < .05) that CRP level predicted a worse prognosis in hypertensive patients (relative risk 2.52; 95% confidence intervals [1.03‐ 6.17]; P = .04), whereas CRP was not predictive of outcome in patients without hypertension. In conclusion, the study revealed that in COVID‐19 patients, hypertension impairs the relationship between inflammation and BP and interacts with inflammation to affect prognosis. These findings provide insights that could explain the relationship between hypertension and outcomes in COVID‐19 patients.