Novel Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndromes: What is New in the Pipeline?

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are triggered by enhanced platelet activation and aggregation. Hence, a cornerstone of successful secondary prevention in ACS is an effective platelet inhibition. Additionally, coronary interventions (PCI) lead to even increased artherothrombotic risks, another challenge in preventing recurrent events including stent thrombosis. Promising platelet targets were characterized and novel molecules were developed that are currently under investigation. Intensified antiplatelet therapy includes the risk of major bleeding which itself increases the mortality rate. Previous strategies of antiplatelet therapy were based on an "one-size fits all" concept. However, there has been evidence that variability of drug response exists and represents a clinically relevant issue. This observation is in line with results of randomized clinical trials that standard-of-care antiplatelet therapy is not sufficient to reduce cardiovascular (CV) risk in certain subgroups of ACS patients. In the last years, novel antiplatelet substances have entered the clinical arena and others are currently under investigation in phase II and III clinical trials. These include 3rd generation thienopyridine (prasugrel, elinogrel), ATP analogs (Ticagrelor, cangrelor), and non-ADP-receptor blocking antiplatelet substances like thrombin receptor antagonists. These agents have shown promising results in pilot studies and recent randomized trials. As the prevention of atherothrombotic risk is at the expense of bleeding risk, it will be a future task to clearly define patients' groups and subsets of ACS for the best net clinical benefit. This article focuses on the role of novel antiplatelet substances to reduce CV risk in ACS, discuss clinical implications and their potential future role.     

Inhibiting PAR-1 in the prevention and treatment of atherothrombotic events

Importance of the field: Aspirin, an irreversible inhibitor of thromboxane A₂ production, in combination with clopidogrel, an inhibitor of PY₁₂ ADP platelet receptors, represents the current standard-of-care of antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome and those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Although these agents have demonstrated significant clinical benefit, the increased risk of bleeding and the recurrence of thrombotic events represent substantial limitations.

Areas covered in this review: The inhibition of protease-activated receptors (PAR)-1, is the target for novel antiplatelet drugs, which showed a good safety profile in preclinical studies. The drugs most developed are vorapaxar (SCH530348) and atopaxar (E5555), which will be further evaluated in ongoing Phase III and II clinical trials respectively.

What the reader will gain: This review is focused on the current knowledge of PAR-1 antagonists, analyzing the pharmacological and early phase clinical investigation findings on these new drugs.

Take home message: The PAR-1 receptor offers a new target for the inhibition of platelet activation and aggregation. Preliminary results showed the good safety profile of these new agents. The results of the Phase III ongoing trials will provide important clinical insight into the blockade of thrombin-induced platelet activation.     

Acute and long-term antiplatelet therapy

Clinical presentations of atherothrombotic vascular disease, i.e., acute coronary syndromes, cerebrovascular events and events associated with peripheral arterial disease, are the major causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Platelet activation and aggregation play an important role in the progression and clinical presentation of atherothrombotic disease, and antiplatelet therapy improves outcome in patients with atherothrombotic vascular disease. Aspirin has been the cornerstone of antiplatelet therapy for many decades, but in recent years, adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonists, mainly clopidogrel and ticlopidine, and glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa (integrin alpha IIb beta 3) inhibitors have also shown similar effectiveness. This review briefly summarizes the major clinical trials and recommendations for the efficacy and safety of antiplatelet therapy in patients with established atherothrombotic disease.     

Pharmacodynamic properties of antiplatelet agents: current knowledge and future perspectives

Platelets play an important role in atherothrombotic disease. The currently available antiplatelet drugs target key steps of platelet activation including thromboxane A(2) synthesis, ADP-mediated signaling, and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa-mediated platelet aggregation. The improvement of our understanding on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of these drugs enables the tailoring of the most appropriate anti-thrombotic therapy to the individual patient and risk situation in the daily clinical practice. However, current antiplatelet therapies are associated with increased bleeding risk. Thus, further research on platelet functions may give rise to numerous new antiplatelet agents with high anti-thrombotic efficiency and low adverse hemorrhagic side effects.     

Role of platelet function testing in clinical practice: current concepts and future perspectives

Oral antiplatelet therapy is routinely administered to ACS patients as well as to patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the primary aim of inhibiting platelet-mediated thrombus formation and subsequent abrupt vessel occlusion. Individual platelet response to aspirin and especially to clopidogrel is highly variable and evidence has grown in recent years linking an attenuated response to therapy with the occurrence of ischemic events. At present, the antiplatelet therapy landscape is changing with the emergence of prasugrel and ticagrelor as alternative and more potent treatment options. In addition, tests for near-patient monitoring of platelet function in clinical practice are available and are being increasingly employed for the optimization of antiplatelet treatment. It is hypothesized that platelet function testing may prove useful for achieving an optimized balance of proven platelet inhibition at a cost of moderate bleeding risk. This is also why first centers have already included testing in day-to-day routine. Extensive clinical evaluations with a range of currently-available assays for platelet function testing are ongoing and the current and future role of platelet function testing in clinical practice is a topic of much debate. Widespread adoption of this practice and its incorporation into clinical guidelines awaits the results of ongoing trials where treatment is changed based on platelet function testing data. This review paper summarizes the key characteristics of platelet function tests available, presents an overview of relevant studies and examines the present role of platelet function testing in clinical practice with a focus on antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing coronary stent placement.     

Pharmacodynamic properties of antiplatelet agents: current knowledge and future perspectives

Platelets play an important role in atherothrombotic disease. The currently available antiplatelet drugs target key steps of platelet activation including thromboxane A₂ synthesis, ADP-mediated signaling, and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa-mediated platelet aggregation. The improvement of our understanding on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of these drugs enables the tailoring of the most appropriate anti-thrombotic therapy to the individual patient and risk situation in the daily clinical practice. However, current antiplatelet therapies are associated with increased bleeding risk. Thus, further research on platelet functions may give rise to numerous new antiplatelet agents with high anti-thrombotic efficiency and low adverse hemorrhagic side effects.     

Vorapaxar: a novel protease-activated receptor-1 inhibitor

INTRODUCTION: Platelet activation and reactivity are pivotal for both acute and chronic atherothrombotic event occurrences. AREAS COVERED: Only 20% relative risk (～ 2% absolute risk) reduction associated with newer P2Y(12) receptor blocker therapy such as prasugrel and ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel indicates that dual antiplatelet therapy may be associated with a ceiling effect in attenuating platelet-mediated ischemic event occurrence and that residual ischemic event occurrences are mediated by other pathways that are unblocked by current antiplatelet therapy. Therefore, inhibition of the thrombin-protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1 interaction may provide additional benefits in attenuating ischemic event occurrence in selected patients. There are two major PAR-1 blockers are under investigations - vorapaxar and atopaxar. In preclinical and Phase I - II studies, inhibition of thrombin-mediated platelet activation by a PAR-1 inhibitor, in general, has added to the antithrombotic efficacy of aspirin and clopidogrel without increasing bleeding. However, intracranial hemorrhage in patients with a history of stroke associated with vorapaxar and hepatic toxicity associated with atopaxar are important concerns. EXPERT OPINION: At this time, the specific role of PAR-1 inhibitor in the settings of percutaneous coronary intervention and acute coronary syndrome, both during the acute setting and as a long-term therapeutic agent, is not clear. Although the PAR-1 inhibitors are associated with less bleeding, its effectiveness as an antithrombotic agent and also side effects are major concerns. Future large-scale trials with goals addressing these concerns are needed to define the specific role of PAR-1 receptor inhibitor.     

Thrombin receptor antagonism –the potential of antiplatelet medication SCH 530348

Importance of the field: Coronary artery disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Platelet activation and subsequent thrombus formation play a central role in disease progression and development of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Despite widespread use of single and dual antiplatelet therapies in atherothrombotic disease, ischemic complications remain common. Therefore, the need exists for new antiplatelet agents that are more effective, but with acceptable safety profiles (i.e., do not increase risk of bleeding). Antiplatelet agents available at present are effective in blocking the cyclo-oxygenase, ADP-mediated and final common (IIb/IIIa receptor) pathways for platelet activation. Recently, there has been more interest in inhibition of the proteinase-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1), which blocks thrombin-mediated platelet activation.

Areas covered in this review: This review covers the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and development of the new PAR₁ antagonist, SCH 530348 in a review of all publications relevant to the topic over the last 10 years. Phase II clinical trials indicate that addition of this agent to current antiplatelet regimens may provide additional antithrombotic protection without an increase in bleeding. Results of the ongoing Phase III trials, examining the use of SCH 530348 in patients with ACS and for secondary prevention of ischemic events are anxiously awaited.

What the reader will gain: The review is a summary of all pharmacologic properties and current clinical data available on the PAR1 antagonist SCH 530348. The readers will be introduced to its novel mechanism of action, advantages over current antiplatelet agents and potential future applications should ongoing clinical trials confirm its efficacy in reducing platelet activity.

Take home message: SCH 530348 is a new, orally administered antiplatelet agent that blocks the protease-activated thrombin receptor on the platelet. Early clinical data indicate that it is associated with a lower risk of bleeding. However, its efficacy in improving clinical outcomes in patients with coronary disease remains to be confirmed in ongoing Phase III clinical trials.     

Monitoring the effectiveness of antiplatelet therapy: opportunities and limitations

Previous clinical studies have shown heterogeneity in individual patient responses to antiplatelet therapy and high residual platelet reactivity is associated with increased risk of adverse clinical events. Monitoring response to antiplatelet therapy and tailoring treatment accordingly is currently not recommended in routine clinical practice largely due to the lack of a standardized definition of antiplatelet therapy hyporesponse and the need for a widely accepted point-of-care platelet function test that can be reliably utilized in frontline clinical practice. Recent data have shown that titrating the dose of clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention significantly reduces the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events and large-scale clinical trials are currently underway to investigate whether individually tailored treatment based on results of platelet function testing leads to improved clinical outcome. Furthermore, genetic testing has demonstrated a link between CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms, altered clopidogrel metabolite concentrations and adverse clinical events. Clinical studies are currently underway to investigate the potential clinical benefit associated with genotype-guided tailoring of antiplatelet therapy. With the advent of newer, more potent antiplatelet agents and their associated increased bleeding risks, it will become imperative in the future to select the most appropriate, safe and effective drug.     

Novel targets for platelet inhibition

Atherothrombosis often underlies coronary artery disease, stroke, and peripheral arterial disease. Antiplatelet drugs have come to the forefront of prophylactic treatment of atherothrombotic disease. Dual antiplatelet therapy of aspirin plus clopidogrel-the current standard-has benefits, but it also has limitations with regard to pharmacologic properties and adverse effects with often severe bleeding complications. For these reasons, within the last decade or so, the investigation of novel antiplatelet targets has prospered. Target identification can be the result of large-scale genomic or proteomic studies, functional genomics in animal models, the genetic analysis of patients with inherited bleeding disorders, or a combination of these techniques.     

Interactions between clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors: a review of evidence

Clopidogrel is a thienopyridine, which inhibits the platelet P2Y adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor termed P2Y(12). It is taken as a prodrug that requires biotransformation to an active metabolite by cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes. In addition, esterases shunt the majority of clopidogrel to an inactive pathway, whilst the remaining prodrug requires two separate CYP-dependent oxidative steps. PPIs might diminish the antiplatelet effects and the clinical effectiveness of clopidogrel possibly through inhibition of CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 isoenzymes. Treatment with clopidogrel and aspirin decreases recurrent cardiovascular events after an acute coronary syndrome. However, an inherent increment of major bleeding is also associated with antiplatelet therapy, as well as dyspepsia with aspirin. Also, major bleeding has been associated with high risk for ischemic events and mortality. For this reason, a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is often co-prescribed to reduce the risk of gastrointestinal tract bleeding, but its concomitant use might reduce the inhibitory effect of clopidogrel on platelet aggregation. Nevertheless, doubts exist about the possible interaction of concomitant PPI use that may reduce the inhibitory effect of clopidogrel on platelet aggregation. Indeed, there is some controversy with regard to the true risk of cardiovascular adverse events arising from a potential drug-drug interaction between clopidogrel and PPI. In this article, we will review the current status and controversies in relation to a possible interaction between clopidogrel and PPIs.     

New perspectives in antiplatelet therapy

Platelet activation is a complex mechanism of response to vascular injury and atherothrombotic disease, leading to thrombus formation. A wide variety of surface receptors -integrins, leucine-rich family receptors, G protein coupled receptors, tyrosine kinase receptors- and intraplatelet molecules support and regulate platelet activation. They are potential targets of antiplatelet therapy for the prevention and treatment of arterial thrombosis. Despite the overall clinical benefit of established antiplatelet drugs targeting cyclooxigenase-1 (COX-1), glycoprotein integrin αIIbβ3, and the purinergic P2Y(12) receptor of adenosine diphosphate, a significant proportion of treated patients continue to experience recurrent ischaemic events. This may be in partly attributed to insufficient inhibition of platelet activation. In addition, it should not be underestimated that these drugs are not immune from bleeding complications. The substantial progress in understating the regulation of platelet activation has played a key role in the development of novel antiplatelet agents. Current examples of drug under development and evaluation include: novel P2Y(12) receptor inhibitors (prasugrel, ticagrelor, cangrelor, and elinogrel), thrombin receptor PAR-1 antagonists (vorapaxar, atopaxar), new integrin glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and inhibitors targeting the thromboxane receptor (TP), phosphodiesterases, the collagen receptor glycoprotein VI, and intraplatelet signalling molecules. This review summarizes the mechanisms of action and current clinical evaluation of these novel antiplatelet agents.     

Aspirin and Other COX-1 Inhibitors

Currently available antiplatelet drugs interfere with the process of platelet activation and aggregation by selectively blocking key enzymes involved in the synthesis of platelet agonists, or membrane receptors mediating activation signals. Pharmacological interference with critical molecular pathways of platelet activation and aggregation may reduce the risk of atherothrombotic complications through mechanisms that are also responsible for an increased risk of bleeding. Acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) represents a prototypic antiplatelet agent. The aim of this chapter is to integrate our current understanding of the molecular mechanism of action of aspirin with the results of clinical trials and epidemiological studies assessing its efficacy and safety. Moreover, the antiplatelet properties of reversible inhibitors of the same drug target will also be reviewed.     

On-treatment platelet reactivity: State of the art and perspectives

High on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (HcPR) during dual-antiplatelet therapy is a marker of vascular risk, in particular stent thrombosis, in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Genetic determinants (CYP2C19*2 polymorphism), advanced age, female gender, diabetes and reduced ventricular function are related to a higher risk to develop HcPR. In addition, inflammation and increased platelet turnover, as revealed by the elevated percentage of reticulated platelets in patients’ blood, that characterize the acute phase of acute coronary syndromes, are associated with HcPR. To overcome the limitation of clopidogrel, new antiplatelet agents (prasugrel and ticagrelor) were developed and the demonstration of their superiority over clopidogrel was obtained in the two randomized trials, TRITON TIMI 38 and PLATO. Emerging evidence is accumulating on the role of high-on aspirin platelet reactivity (HaPR), especially in the clinical context of diabetes. Finally, the presence of new, potent antiplatelet drugs has shifted the focus from thrombotic to bleeding risk. Recent data document that low on-treatment platelet reactivity (LPR) is associated with a significantly higher bleeding risk. Due to the current possibility to choose between multiple antiplatelet strategies, the future perspective is to include in the management of ACS, in addition to clinical data and classical risk factors, the definition of platelet function during treatment in order to set a tailored therapy.     

Pharmacogenetics of P2Y12 receptor inhibitors

Oral P2Y₁₂ inhibitors are commonly prescribed for cardiovascular disease and include clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor. Each of these drugs has its strengths and weaknesses. Prasugrel and ticagrelor are more potent inhibitors of platelet aggregation and were shown to be superior to clopidogrel in preventing major adverse cardiovascular events after an acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the absence of genotyping. However, both are associated with an increased risk for non-coronary artery bypass-related bleeding. Clopidogrel is a prodrug requiring bioactivation, primarily via the CYP2C19 enzyme. Approximately 30% of individuals have a CYP2C19 no function allele and decreased or no CYP2C19 enzyme activity. Clopidogrel-treated carriers of a CYP2C19 no function allele have decreased exposure to the clopidogrel active metabolite and lesser inhibition of platelet aggregation, which likely contributed to reduced clopidogrel efficacy in clinical trials. The pharmacogenetic data for clopidogrel are most robust in the setting of PCI, but evidence is accumulating for other indications. Guidance is available from expert consensus groups and regulatory agencies to assist with integrating genetic information into P2Y₁₂ inhibitor prescribing decisions, and CYP2C19 genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy after PCI is one of the most common examples of clinical pharmacogenetic implementation. Herein, we review the evidence for pharmacogenetic associations with clopidogrel response and outcomes with genotype-guided P2Y₁₂ inhibitor selection and describe guidance to assist with pharmacogenetic implementation. We also describe processes for applying genotype data for P2Y₁₂ inhibitor therapy selection and remaining gaps in the field. Ultimately, consideration of both clinical and genetic factors may guide selection of P2Y₁₂ inhibitor therapy that optimally balances the atherothrombotic and bleeding risks.     

Prasugrel: a novel platelet ADP P2Y12 receptor antagonist. A review on its mechanism of action and clinical development

Antiplatelet therapy is the cornerstone of treatment for patients who present with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Clopidogrel, in combination with aspirin, is associated with improvement in long-term clinical outcomes in these patients and is currently the antiplatelet therapy of choice. However, a significant number of patients experience recurrent ischemic events, which have been in part attributed to variability in individual response profiles to currently recommended treatment regimens. The presence of variable degrees of responsiveness, thus inadequate platelet inhibition in some patients, underscores the need for novel agents with more potency and less variable platelet inhibitory effects. Prasugrel (CS-747; LY640315), a novel third-generation oral thienopyridine, is a specific, irreversible antagonist of the platelet adenosine diphosphate (ADP) P2Y₁₂ receptor. Pre-clinical and early phase clinical studies have shown prasugrel to be characterized by more potent antiplatelet effects, lower interindividual variability in platelet response, and faster onset of activity compared with clopidogrel. Recent findings from large-scale Phase III testing showed prasugrel to be more efficacious in preventing ischemic events in ACS patients undergoing PCI; however, this is achieved at the expense of an increased risk of bleeding. This article reviews the currently available data regarding the efficacy and safety of prasugrel.     

Ticagrelor: Positive,negative and misunderstood properties as a new antiplatelet agent

相似文献   

Monitoring antiplatelet therapy: What is the best method?

Platelet function tests measure different aspects of platelet function, which include adherence, activation, aggregation and secretion. Clinically, the goal of platelet function testing is to provide information about the platelet contribution to the risk of thrombotic or haemorrhagic events and the optimisation of antiplatelet therapy. The important clinical questions are whether an antiplatelet agent is having the desired effect on platelet inhibition (effectiveness) and whether the patient has sufficient residual platelet function to avoid bleeding (safety). The role of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) and thienopyridines is well established in the management of patients with coronary artery disease and in the setting of coronary interventions. The last several years have demonstrated the unequivocal effectiveness of intravenously administered platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists in the management of acute coronary syndromes and in the setting of percutaneous coronary interventions. With the increasing use of these GPIIb/IIIa antagonists, it is becoming more important clinically to measure platelet inhibition with these agents. This paper reviews major techniques and instrumentation for platelet monitoring and discusses the goals of the best method.     

Dual antiplatelet therapy for prevention of recurrent ischemic events.

The advantages of dual antiplatelet therapy over monotherapy in preventing recurrent ischemic events are examined. Atherosclerosis is an insidious systemic process involving multiple vascular beds, including the cerebral, coronary, and peripheral arteries. Atherosclerotic plaque rupture is one of the inciting events in the progression of platelet activation, aggregation, and thrombus formation. Patients with any clinical manifestation of atherosclerosis are vulnerable to others in different vascular beds since the disease develops throughout the vasculature, and different vascular events have common predisposing risk factors. Ischemic coronary heart disease and cerebrovascular disease are two of the three most frequent causes of death in the United States. The efficacy of aspirin in the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke has been demonstrated in numerous trials. While dipyridamole has not been linked with a greater odds reduction than aspirin in the development of MI, stroke, and vascular death, ticlopidine and clopidogrel have been associated with a greater reduction in the development of acute MI, stroke, and vascular death than aspirin. Clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of combination antiplatelet therapy in the prevention of recurrent ischemic events are ongoing. The rationale for using a combination of two mechanistically different antiplatelet agents is supported by ex vivo and clinical studies. Inhibition of platelet aggregation and thrombus formation is enhanced with dual antiplatelet therapy. Combination antiplatelet regimens with different mechanisms of action to inhibit multiple sites in the thrombotic pathway may further improve long-term clinical outcomes. Dual antiplatelet therapy may have advantages over monotherapy in the prevention of recurrent ischemic events.     

Safety of clopidogrel and aspirin for stroke prevention: implications of the CHARISMA trial.

Antiplatelet therapy is universally recommended for the prevention of recurrent events in patients with noncardioembolic ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), acute and chronic coronary artery disease, or peripheral arterial disease. However, choosing which antiplatelet agents to use in these situations remains controversial. The use of aspirin, aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole, or clopidogrel is recommended as initial therapy in patients with noncardioembolic ischaemic stroke or TIA to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke and other cardiovascular events. Based on the results of the MATCH trial, combination therapy with aspirin plus clopidogrel is not recommended for patients with ischaemic stroke or TIA due to the increased risk of haemorrhage.The results of the CHARISMA trial support this recommendation; despite previous data demonstrating a favourable benefit-risk profile of aspirin plus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome, this combination should not be used in patients at high risk for atherothrombosis and those with previous stroke or TIA. In these patients, the CHARISMA trial demonstrated a lack of significant clinical efficacy and an increased risk of bleeding with clopidogrel plus aspirin compared with aspirin alone.Further research is needed to assess the benefit-risk ratio of clopidogrel plus aspirin in specific subpopulations of patients at high risk for atherothrombotic events, and to determine the role of clopidogrel plus aspirin in preventing cardioembolic stroke or early recurrent stroke after symptomatic large-vessel atherostenosis. Recent and ongoing studies are seeking to better define the roles of different antiplatelet regimens in preventing recurrent stroke.