Psychosocial issues in the assessment and management of patients undergoing lung transplantation

This review examines psychosocial issues among lung transplant patients from the time of assessment through the posttransplant period. Although psychological factors are recognized as being important in the transplant evaluation, no standard approach to psychological assessment currently exists. Lung transplant candidates often experience high levels of psychological distress while awaiting transplant, and both pretransplant and posttransplant psychological functioning have been found to predict posttransplant quality of life, adherence to treatment, and, in some cases, medical outcomes. Given the limited long-term survival following transplantation, improving psychosocial functioning is essential for enhancing outcomes among lung transplant recipients. This review summarizes the extant literature on the psychosocial factors in lung transplantation and highlights several innovative efforts to improve psychological outcomes in this challenging patient population.     

Patient evaluation for cardiac transplantation

The aim for cardiac transplantation is to improve the quality of life and the survival in patients with end-stage heart failure. Given the scarcity of donor organ availability, the expense of the transplantation process and follow-up care, as well as the tremendous emotional burden the process places on a patient and his/her family, it is essential to carefully screen potential candidates for their symptomatic, functional, hemodynamic, and psychosocial eligibility, and to rule out coexisting hemodynamic or comorbid conditions that would jeopardize successful transplantation and immunosuppression. Comprehensive screening of potential transplant candidates, which is best accomplished by a multidisciplinary team approach working closely with patients and their families, is essential to insure that maximum benefit is derived from this scarce and valuable resource.     

Liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease: selection and outcome

There is clear consensus that patients with alcoholic cirrhosis should be considerated for liver transplantation, barring complicating medical or psychosocial problems. Short-term and long-term survival rates are comparable to patients receiving transplants for other conditions, and the relapse rate to alcohol use averages 15%, with troublesome drinking seen uncommonly. To date, no nationally accepted selection criteria have been established and proved effective in predicting long-term sobriety and compliance. To maximize the outcome of liver transplantation in patients with alcoholic liver disease, an approach to the selection of candidates is outlined herewith. 1. Minimum pretransplant sobriety period of 6 months. 2. Assessment of overall psychosocial support and stress. 3. Assessment of comorbid psychiatric conditions that may impair ability to comply with the transplant protocol during and after transplantation. 4. Assessment of past and present compliance with medical treatment. 5. Acceptance of problem with alcohol and willingness to sign an alcohol contract. 6. Willingness to participate in alcohol rehabilitation treatment program. 7. Willingness to participate in liver support groups to improve understanding of the condition and obtain social support. 8. Willingness to undergo random toxicology screening to assess compliance with sobriety.     

When is Retransplantation a Viable Option?

As the number of recipients of heart transplantation grows over time and they survive longer, more are at risk for developing severe cardiac allograft vasculopathy and allograft dysfunction, which might lead to consideration for retransplantation. Clearly, outcomes following cardiac retransplantation are compromised, and with donor shortage, the selection of candidates must be judicious. Retransplantation appears most appropriate for those patients more than 6 months following original heart transplantation, who have severe cardiac allograft vasculopathy and associated left ventricular dysfunction, or allograft dysfunction and progressive symptoms of heart failure in the absence of acute rejection. Relative contraindications to transplantation (ie, advanced age, comorbidities, psychosocial issues) require thorough assessment when retransplantation is being considered.     

Patient selection for liver transplantation

Improved outcomes in liver transplant recipients reflect advances in surgical technique, post-operative care, immunosuppression as well as better selection of potential candidates. The pre-transplant evaluation is a multidisciplinary process intended to recognize and treat important comorbid conditions that may impair outcomes during the peri- and post-transplant periods. Important psychosocial issues should also be ascertained and tackled early during the pre-transplant evaluation with an overarching intention to improve the success of liver transplantation.     

Impact of psychosocial comorbidities on clinical outcomes after liver transplantation: Stratification of a high-risk population

BACKGROUND Liver transplantation is the accepted standard of care for end-stage liver disease due to a variety of etiologies including decompensated cirrhosis, fulminant hepatic failure, and primary hepatic malignancy. There are currently over 13000 candidates on the liver transplant waiting list emphasizing the importance of rigorous patient selection. There are few studies regarding the impact of additional psychosocial barriers to liver transplant including financial hardship,lack of caregiver support, polysubstance abuse, and issues with medical noncompliance. We hypothesized that patients with certain psychosocial comorbidities experienced worse outcomes after liver transplantation.AIM To assess the impact of certain pre-transplant psychosocial comorbidities on outcomes after liver transplantation.METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed on all adult patients from 2012-2016.Psychosocial comorbidities including documented medical non-compliance,polysubstance abuse, financial issues, and lack of caregiver support were collected. The primary outcome assessed post-transplantation was survival.Secondary outcomes measured included graft failure, episodes of acute rejection,psychiatric decompensation, number of readmissions, presence of infection,recidivism for alcohol and other substances, and documented caregiver support failure.RESULTS For the primary outcome, there were no differences in survival. Patients with ahistory of psychiatric disease had a higher incidence of psychiatric decompensation after liver transplantation(19% vs 10%, P = 0.013). Treatment of psychiatric disorders resulted in a reduction of the incidence of psychiatric decompensation(21% vs 11%, P = 0.022). Patients with a history of polysubstance abuse in the transplant evaluation had a higher incidence of substance abuse after transplantation(5.8% vs 1.2%, P = 0.05). In this cohort, 15 patients(3.8%) were found to have medical compliance issues in the transplant evaluation. Of these specific patients, 13.3% were found to have substance abuse after transplantation as opposed to 1.3% in patients without documented compliance issues(P = 0.03).CONCLUSION Patients with certain psychosocial comorbidities had worse outcomes following liver transplantation. Further prospective and multi-center studies are warranted to properly determine guidelines for liver transplantation regarding this highrisk population.     

A critical review of candidacy for orthotopic liver transplantation in alcoholic liver disease

The majority of candidates with end-stage alcoholic liver disease (ESALD) in the United States who are eligible for referral for liver transplantation (LT) are not being referred. There is a lack of firm consensus for the duration of abstinence from alcohol as well as what constitutes good psychosocial criteria for listing for LT. Evidence shows that the general public and the practicing physicians outside the transplant community perceive that patients with a history of alcohol abuse will make poor transplant candidates. However, physicians in the transplant community perceive selected patients with ESALD as good candidates. When considering patients for listing for LT, 3 months of alcohol abstinence may be more ideal than 6 months. Patients with a lack of social support, active smoking, psychotic or personality disorders, or a pattern of nonadherence should be listed only with reservation. Those who have a diagnosis of alcohol abuse as opposed to alcohol dependence may make better transplant candidates. Patients who have regular appointments with a psychiatrist or psychologist in addictions treatment training also seem to do more favorably.     

Current indication for hematopoietic cell transplantation in adults

With advances in transplantation technology and supportive care practices, hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has become relatively safer and the applicability of HCT continues to expand. However, appropriate selection of transplant candidates remains challenging. Identifying adult patients who may benefit from HCT involves consideration of patient and disease factors, including overall health, prior therapies, age, comorbidity, and disease/disease risk. The eligibility of transplants should be decided on a case by case basis, based upon a risk-benefit assessment. The advent of the tools for assessing patient factors such as HCT-specific comorbidity index and disease factors such as disease risk index serve as assets for the decision-making process. Besides those approaches, psychosocial assessment to know the candidates’ personalities and related issues are crucial in order to maximize patients’ participation in their own care and to lay the foundation for a successful return to their personal and professional life after HCT.     

Evaluación psicosocial para trasplante hepático: una guía breve para gastroenterólogos

Liver transplantation is a lifesaving treatment that improves survival and quality of life. The procedure requires adequate transplant candidate selection carried out by a multidisciplinary team. Psychosocial evaluation is a necessary part of recipient selection and its primary aims are to identify problems and psychosocial needs of the patient and his/her family, to improve transplantation outcomes. Different psychosocial conditions are considered risk factors for morbidity and mortality after transplantation. The presence of those factors per se is not an absolute contraindication, thus adequate evaluation promotes equal access to healthcare, improves results, and optimizes resources. The present review provides an overview of and guidelines for the most important psychosocial issues during the pretransplantation phase.     

To transplant or not? The importance of psychosocial and behavioural factors before lung transplantation

The gratifying results of lung transplantation in terms of survival and quality of life stimulate the referral of an ever-increasing number of patients with end-stage lung disease. This in turn compounds the organ shortage, which is the limiting factor in the transplantation rate. In the absence of good alternative treatment modalities, an evidence-based pretransplant screening process is a prerequisite to determine which patients will benefit most from transplantation. Within this evidence-based screening process, medical selection criteria are well established. There is a growing awareness that psychosocial and behavioural factors may determine outcome after transplantation as well. This paper reviews the available evidence for psychosocial and behavioural factors in the screening process for lung transplantation. The relation of various factors with post-transplant outcome was explored. Psychosocial characteristics before transplantation consist of 1) anxiety and depression, 2) personality disorders, 3) neurocognitive problems, and 4) lack of social support. Pretransplant behavioural factors include 1) noncompliance with medication, 2) alcohol abuse or dependence, 3) smoking, 4) noncompliance with dietary guidelines, and 5) noncompliance with monitoring of vital parameters and infections. It appears that the lack of rigorous studies limit the feasibility of an evidence-based screening process. Prospective studies are crucial to this further investigation of the relationship between psychosocial and behavioural determinants before transplantation and outcomes after transplantation, in terms of compliance, morbidity, and mortality. Identification of modifiable risk factors for poor outcome before transplantation is a first step in developing interventions.     

Health-related quality of life and psychological correlates in patients listed for liver transplantation

Purpose Given the increasing waiting time for liver transplantation, and the amount of possible stressors associated with it, assessment of psychological well-being and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in these patients is warranted in order to optimize pretransplant care. Patients and methods Patients with chronic liver disease (n = 32) awaiting transplantation completed a series of questionnaires measuring HRQoL, depression, anxiety, coping, and self-efficacy. Comparisons were made with other patients with liver disease with and without cirrhosis, and a healthy norm population. Relationships among these psychological variables were explored and subgroup analyses were performed to assess possible differences in coping strategies. Results Compared to other patients with liver disease without cirrhosis, liver transplant candidates had statistically significantly lower HRQoL scores on the subscales of physical functioning (P < 0.001) and general health (P < 0.001). Their HRQoL did not differ from patients with liver disease with cirrhosis. Overall, patients awaiting liver transplantation had significantly reduced HRQoL (P < 0.001) and increased depression scores (P < 0.001) compared to healthy controls. Levels of depression, anxiety, self-efficacy, and coping did not differ between liver transplant candidates and other patients with liver disease. Depression correlated significantly with HRQoL. Patients without depression made significantly more use of active coping strategies than patients with elevated depression levels. Conclusions Patients awaiting liver transplantation are not experiencing worse physical and psychological HRQoL than other liver patients with cirrhosis of the liver. Therefore, there is currently no indication to increase the level of psychosocial care for liver transplant candidates.     

Indications and selection criteria for cardiac transplantation

Assessment of indications for cardiac transplantation is a complex process including first a comparison of expected survival of a patient with end-stage heart disease, mostly ischemic or dilative cardiomyopathy, allocated either to conventional medical or surgical therapy or to cardiac transplantation, second the expected increase in exercise tolerance and quality of life after transplantation. Furthermore the exclusion of contraindications is required: severe irreversible secondary organ damage (especially of kidneys and liver), malignant tumors and systemic malignancies, severe pulmonary hypertension, florid infections, unstable psychosocial conditions of the patient and his surrounding. Although a considerable number of clinical, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic and hemodynamic factors have been defined as indicating very poor prognosis, there exists no prognostic index combining all these factors into a precise prediction of survival of an individual patient with end-stage cardiac failure. Whereas high survival rates have been concordantly documented for the first years after transplantation, the long-term prognosis cannot be estimated as yet with equally sufficient certainty, due to increasing observation of vasculopathies and of progressive myocardial (mostly diastolic) dysfunction of transplanted hearts. These problems suggest to continue with very careful selection of candidates for transplantation. Even in the case of cardiac decompensation and poor prognostic factors, usually a single examination of the patient is not sufficient, but rather a thorough observation of the patient over a period of time including an evaluation of the rate of clinical and hemodynamic decline and of the response to medical therapy.     

Ventricular Assist Devices as Destination Therapy: Psychosocial and Ethical Implications

One of the candidate evaluation challenges is determining when and how psychosocial domains influence short- and long-term destination therapy ventricular assist device (DT-VAD) outcomes. There are very few DT-VAD studies and no validated instruments to identify psychosocial risk factors. General practice is to borrow from the transplant literature, which may not be applicable to this unique device application. We question the relevance of using transplant psychosocial evaluation for patients who are candidates for DT-VAD only, particularly because these patients require a certain level of cognitive, psychological, and behavioral functioning to ensure proper long-term self-care with the VAD. We may be missing important psychological characteristics in our pre-evaluations by “borrowing” from the transplant literature, thereby underplaying significant factors that are especially relevant for DT-VAD candidates. Conversely, we may be screening out candidates who may benefit greatly from DT-VAD by using transplant criteria as part of the screening process. We use a case study to illustrate some of the challenges of weighing psychosocial risk factors in the DT-VAD population and to emphasize the need for developing distinct psychosocial assessment criteria for DT-VAD patients.     

Donor program for fecal microbiota transplantation: A 3-year experience of a large-volume Italian stool bank

BackgroundDue to the increasing rise of C. difficile infection, stool banks and donor programs have been launched to grant access to fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). Our aim is to describe characteristics and outcomes of the donor program at our stool bank.MethodsDonor candidates underwent a four-step selection process, including a clinical interview, blood and stool testing, a further questionnaire and a direct stool testing the day of each donation. From March 2020, specific changes to this process were introduced to avoid the potential transmission of COVID-19. We evaluated the rate of excluded candidates at each step of the screening, as well as the number of total fecal aliquots provided by qualified donors.ResultsOverall, 114 donor candidates were evaluated. Seventy-five candidates declined to join the program for logistic or personal issues, three were excluded after the questionnaire and seven for positive stool exams. Finally, 29 (25%) subjects qualified as stool donors, and provided 70 stool samples. Fifteen samples were excluded after direct molecular stool testing. A total of 127 aliquots was finally obtained.ConclusionsDonor recruitment for FMT is a challenging process, and only a small rate of candidates are eligible as donors.     

Depression After Lung Transplantation: Causes and Treatment

During the postoperative course of lung transplantation, patients may experience depressive symptoms that negatively influence their ability to cope with the new organ, their adherence to rehabilitation and pharmacologic therapy, and their overall quality of life (QoL). To date, no review has explored the causes of depression following transplantation or the efficacy and safety of therapeutic interventions in this patient group. We conducted a comprehensive 1966-2006 MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO search for studies of the causes and treatments of depression in lung transplant recipients. We identified 25 studies of variable methodologic quality. Depression rates are high among candidates for lung transplantation. In the short term, after surgery depressive symptoms remain low with an improvement in QoL, whereas in the long term (>3 years), the decline of functional status is associated with a dramatic increase in such symptomatology. Personality disorders, coping strategies, stressful life events, physical complications, corticosteroid medications, age, gender, and psychosocial support all play a central role in causing depressive states in lung transplant recipients. Serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and new-generation antidepressants (mirtazapine) represent the best therapeutic choices for this group of patients. The risk of serious drug-drug interactions should be carefully monitored by experienced clinicians. Complementary therapies and psychoeducational intervention also help recipients to strengthen their coping strategies, offering further advantages after transplantation. Additional well-conducted randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify the epidemiologic course of depression following lung transplantation and to tailor effective pharmacologic or psychological interventions accordingly.     

Living donor liver transplantation: histological abnormalities found on liver biopsies of apparently healthy potential donors

OBJECTIVE: With the continued shortage of deceased donor grafts, living donor liver transplantation has become an option for adult liver transplant candidates. In the non-transplant setting, liver biopsy is typically carried out to evaluate clinical or biochemical hepatic dysfunction. In living donor liver transplantation, assessment of histological abnormalities that are undetectable by serological, biochemical and radiological methods might play an important role in donor and recipient outcome. METHODS: Seventy consecutive liver biopsies carried out as part of our evaluation of potential donor candidates for adult-to-adult or adult-to-child living donor liver transplants were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 70 potential donor candidates who underwent liver biopsy for evaluation for living donor liver transplantation, 67% had an unexpected abnormality, of which steatosis was the most common abnormality (38.5%). A variety of other histopathological abnormalities were found including granulomas of unknown etiology (7%), chronic hepatitis (6%) and a microabscess. None of the histological abnormalities had been suspected despite extensive clinical, serological or radiological investigation. CONCLUSIONS: Among the 70 potential donor candidates for living donor liver transplantation, 34% had unremarkable liver biopsies. The most common abnormality was steatosis (38.5%). These findings suggest that all potential candidates for living donor liver transplants should undergo screening liver biopsies. The precise significance of these changes remains to be determined, including which of these changes are contraindications to liver transplantation. These findings may also have implications in the non-transplant setting as changes ascribed to specific etiologies for liver disease might include changes occurring in apparently healthy individuals.     

Pulmonary rehabilitation and COPD

Pulmonary rehabilitation has been well established and increasingly recommended in disease management plans for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Key elements include a multidisciplinary approach to care, focus on the individual patient, and attention to emotional and social as well as physical aspects of health. Appropriate candidates are symptomatic patients with chronic lung disease who are aware of their disability and motivated to participate actively in their own health care. Pulmonary rehabilitation has also been useful for patients with other types of chronic lung diseases. Program components include a careful patient evaluation, education, instruction in respiratory and chest physiotherapy techniques, exercise training, and psychosocial support. Benefits demonstrated in a growing body of evidence include improvement in symptoms, exercise tolerance, and quality of life and reduction in utilization of health care resources. Pulmonary rehabilitation has also been included as an adjunct to surgical programs such as lung transplantation and lung volume reduction surgery.     

Patients' psychosocial concerns following stem cell transplantation

Information regarding the nature, frequency, correlates and temporal trajectory of concerns of stem cell transplantation (SCT) recipients is critical to the development of interventions to enhance quality of life (QOL) in these individuals. This study examined psychosocial concerns in 110 SCT (87% autologous) recipients drawn from two SCT centers. Participants were a mean of 46 years of age and 17 months post-SCT (range 3-62 months). Information regarding current and past SCT-related concerns, performance status, and demographic characteristics was collected by telephone interview or questionnaire. Recipients reported a wide variety of psychosocial concerns following SCT. Recipients who were younger, female and evidenced a poorer performance status reported a larger number of post-SCT concerns. Examination of the temporal trajectory of concerns suggests that some concerns are salient throughout the course of post-SCT recovery (eg disease recurrence, energy level, 'returning to normal'), some are salient early in the course of recovery (eg quality of medical care, overprotectiveness by others), and others emerge later in the course of recovery (eg feeling tense or anxious, sexual life, sleep, relationship with spouse/partner, ability to be affectionate). Implications for the development of interventions to enhance post-SCT QOL are identified.     

Screening for psychosocial risk factors in patients with coronary heart disease-recommendations for clinical practice.

Psychosocial risk factors like low socio-economic status, chronic family or work stress, social isolation, negative emotions (e.g., chronic depression or acute anxiety), and negative personality patterns such as Type-D-pattern or hostility, may contribute significantly to the development and adverse outcome of coronary heart disease. Therefore, systematic screening for psychosocial risk factors in cardiological practice is recommended in order to initiate adequate intervention strategies, e.g., to involve additional psychosocial counselling or treatment. Reliable methods to assess psychosocial risk factors are: (1) standardized, structured interviews; (2) standardized questionnaires, and (3) 'single-item' questions to be included into the cardiologists' clinical interviews. While structured interviews should be restricted to trained professionals, questionnaires are easily to administer, and have frequently been used in the field of cardiology. 'Single item' questions are sufficiently reliable and the most timesaving way to screen for psychosocial factors. For clinical practice, a two-step evaluation is recommended: firstly, cardiologists should include 'single-item' questions into their routine interview and/or use questionnaires in order to screen for a potential problem. Secondly, if problems are indicated, patients should be passed to qualified professionals for structured clinical interview. Instruments of all three methods are briefly presented, and implications for further treatment are discussed.     

Lebertransplantation bei prim?r sklerosierender Cholangitis und Colitis ulcerosa

The survival of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is reduced in part because of an increased incidence of cholangiocellular carcinoma. However, the timing of liver transplantation represents a considerable clinical challenge. The clinical course of PSC is frequently slowly progressive and can develop acutely with the occurrence of septic cholangitis. In most cases this situation is not adequately reflected by established prognostic models, including the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, which is the basis for donor organ allocation in liver transplantation candidates. Therefore, an exceptional-case status has been defined for certain transplantation candidates with PSC (?Exceptional MELD“). The increased risk of cholangiocarcinoma alone does not warrant prophylactic liver transplantation. The overall results after liver transplantation for PSC are generally better than for other indications, although up to 40% develop recurrent PSC or a PSC-like syndrome. In PSC patients with cholangiocarcinoma, liver transplantation should not be performed outside of clinical studies. The prevalence of chronic inflammatory bowel disease after liver transplantation in patients with PSC is reported to exceed 65% (up to 100%) and is usually classified as ulcerative colitis. Proctocolectomy can be safely performed after transplantation. However, the extent to which patients have an improved course of recurrent PSC after proctocolectomy has yet to be established.