Safety of Conversion From Twice-Daily Tacrolimus (Prograf) to Once-Daily Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus (Advagraf) in Stable Liver Transplant Recipients

Nonadherence to immunosuppressive regimens among solid organ transplantation to range has been estimated from 15% to 55%. This problem has been identified as a leading cause of preventable graft loss. Tacrolimus once daily Advagraf has been developed to provide a more convenient dosing regimen to improve adherence. The aim of this study was to analyze the safety of a 1:1 dose conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus (Prograf) to Advagraf in 36 stable liver transplant recipients. The tacrolimus whole blood trough level at T0 was 6.7 ± 2.9 ng/mL with a daily dose of 3.7 ± 1.8 mg. The mean tacrolimus blood trough levels at T1 (7 days) and T2 (14 days) were 5.8 ± 2.5 and 5.8 ± 1.8 ng/mL with mean daily doses of 3.9 ± 1.9 and 4.1 ± 1.8 mg, respectively. There was no significant difference between T0, T1, and T2, either for tacrolimus blood trough levels or for tacrolimus daily dosages. Liver and renal function tests remained stable; no episodes of acute rejection were encountered after the conversion. A switching policy using a dose ratio of 1:1 from twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus was safely applied to stable liver transplant recipients.     

Safety and Efficacy of Once-Daily Modified-Release Tacrolimus in Liver Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter Postmarketing Surveillance in Japan

Introduction

Modified-release formulation of tacrolimus (TAC-MR) has been developed with the intent of improving patient adherence and quality of life. A number of studies have indicated that the efficacy and safety of once-daily TAC-MR were comparable with those of the original formulation, twice-daily tacrolimus. However, its dosage, trough level, safety, and efficacy in the multicenter clinical experience of Japanese liver transplant recipients have not been reported.

Methods

This postmarketing surveillance designed as an open-label, prospective, noninterventional observational study was performed. The 24 patients were enrolled for de novo transplantation, and the 122 patients were enrolled for conversion to TAC-MR from 22 medical institutions in Japan. The observation period is 1 year in de novo transplantation, and 24 weeks in conversion.

Results

Regarding de novo transplant, the median daily TAC-MR dose was 0.041 mg/kg/d at 1 day after transplantation, and the median tacrolimus trough level was 5.5 ng/mL at 3 days after transplantation. The most common adverse drug reactions were infections, at an incidence rate of 25.0%. The most common infections were cytomegalovirus viremia, at an incidence rate of 12.5%. Both patient and graft survival rates at 1 year were 94.1% and the rejection rate was 20.8%. Regarding conversion to TAC-MR, the median daily conventional TAC dose before conversion was 1.8 mg/d, and the daily TAC-MR dose was 1.5 mg/d. The median TAC trough level was 3.6 ng/mL before conversion and 3.5 ng/mL 1 week after conversion. The most common adverse drug reactions were infections, at an incidence rate of 5.1%. Episodes of death or graft loss did not occur, and there were 3 episodes of rejection. After conversion to once-daily TAC-MR, the patients' adherence was improved.

Conclusion

This study shows that a TAC-MR–based immunosuppressive regimen is safe and effective as used in Japanese clinical practice.     

Pilot Study Comparing the Efficacy,Safety, Convertibility,and Tacrolimus Trough Levels of Twice-Daily Tacrolimus (Prograf) to Once-Daily Tacrolimus (Advagraf) Among Standard-Risk Kidney Transplant Patients at the National Kidney and Transplant Institute

BackgroundRecently, a once-daily formulation of tacrolimus (Advagraf) was released in the Philippines. Studies have shown that these 2 formulations are bioequivalent at a 1:1 conversion. This study aims to determine the efficacy, safety, convertibility, and tacrolimus trough level of once-daily tacrolimus at the end of 6 months post transplant.MethodsThis is a randomized study among standard-risk primary kidney transplant patients performed at the National Kidney and Transplant Institute, Philippines. A total of 40 patients completed the 6-month follow-up. Patients in Group A who failed to meet the criteria for conversion to once-daily tacrolimus were considered to have reached the end of the study, while patients who satisfied the conversion criteria will be followed up for an additional 6 months.ResultsBaseline characteristics were similar in both groups. The area under the curve, maximum concentration, time to achieve the maximum concentration, and the coefficient of variation were similar. The twice-daily tacrolimus (Prograf) group patients had significantly higher mean tacrolimus trough levels than the Group B once-daily tacrolimus patients. An increase of a once-daily tacrolimus mean dose of 8% was required to achieve a therapeutic drug level post conversion. The graft and patient survival were 100%. There was no biopsy-proven acute rejection noted either both group.ConclusionIn conclusion, conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily tacrolimus in kidney transplant in both de novo and converted patients after KT is safe, ensuring greater stability of drug blood concentrations than the standard form. The results also suggest an 8% increase when converting stable KT patients from twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily tacrolimus.     

Coadministration of Erythromycin to Increase Tacrolimus Concentrations in Liver Transplant Recipients

BackgroundWe evaluated the effects of using erythromycin (ERY) in liver transplant recipients to improve the early postoperative control of tacrolimus (TAC) concentration.MethodsThis study adopts a retrospective medical record analysis method from January 2015 to December 2017. Assessment items include TAC daily dose (D), TAC whole blood trough level (Co), rejection episodes, and adverse effects. The magnitude of ERY inhibition on TAC metabolism was decided by analyzing dose-corrected trough concentration (Co/D). Oral 250 mg ERY every day to every other day was prescribed when patients needed to swallow more than 10 capsules of TAC per day, TAC trough levels rose too slowly, and/or acute rejection occurred. TAC trough levels were obtained daily. ERY was stopped when the TAC trough level was above 10 ng/mL or rejection episode relieved.ResultsA total of 8 liver transplant recipients was collected. Oral ERY was administered at 6 to 13 days after transplantation. The duration of ERY regimen was 2 to 7 days. The average initial and maximum Co/D was 0.6 ± 0.0 and 1.8 ± 1.0. After ERY was deleted, Co/D was back to the value without ERY at about 2 to 20 days. The magnitude of interaction between tacrolimus and erythromycin is 1.4- to 4.6-fold. The highest dose of TAC was 10 to 12 mg/d. There were no drug-related complications during this period. Acute rejection relapsed in 1 patient after we stopped ERY.ConclusionCoadministration of ERY and TAC is a strategic choice for liver transplant recipients whose TAC blood concentration was difficult in approaching therapeutic levels.     

Renal function, efficacy and safety postconversion from twice- to once-daily tacrolimus in stable liver recipients: an open-label multicenter study

This multicenter, open-label, phase III study assessed renal function, safety, and efficacy in stable adult liver transplant recipients converted from tacrolimus twice-daily (BID) to once-daily (QD). Patients received tacrolimus BID for 6weeks before conversion to tacrolimus QD (1:1 [mg:mg] total daily dose basis) for 12weeks. Primary endpoint: change in steady state creatinine clearance (CrCl) between treatment phases. Of 112 patients enrolled, 98 were converted to QD dosing (full analysis set [FAS]). Mean (SD) tacrolimus dose was 3.7 (1.7) mg/day during BID and at conversion, and 3.9 (1.8) mg/day at Week 12. 74.5% of patients required no dose adjustment on conversion (FAS). Mean tacrolimus whole blood trough levels were at the lower end of the recommended range during tacrolimus BID and QD; the difference between mean steady-state trough levels was statistically significant (7.5ng/ml vs. 6.5ng/ml; P<0.0001). Following conversion, mean tacrolimus trough levels were reduced by 15% (about 1ng/ml) without any cases of acute rejection, remained stable during the remainder of the study, and were more consistent, showing reduced between- and within-patient variability in trough levels. Renal function remained stable, demonstrating noninferiority of tacrolimus QD versus BID (relative difference in mean calculated CrCl -0.1% [±6.3%]). Patient and graft survival were 100%. Adverse events incidence was low during both treatment phases.     

Effects of Conversion From a Twice-Daily Tacrolimus to a Once-Daily Tacrolimus on Glucose Metabolism in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients

Introduction

The adverse effects of tacrolimus are known to play major roles in new-onset diabetes after transplantation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of conversion from a twice-daily tacrolimus (Tac-BID) to a once-daily tacrolimus (Tac-OD) on glucose metabolism in stable kidney transplant recipients.

Patients and methods

Twenty-six patients were converted from Tac-BID to Tac-OD on a 1:1 mg basis and examined for its effects on glucose metabolism. Unless rejection or tacrolimus toxicity was suspected, we did not perform dose adjustments of Tac-OD or reconversion to Tac-BID until 4 weeks after conversion. Subsequent dose adjustments were allowed to maintain tacrolimus target trough concentration within the. Changes in clinical parameters were compared between baseline and 24 weeks after conversion.

Results

Conversion from Tac-BID to Tac-OD on a 1:1 mg basis resulted in a significant decrease in tacrolimus trough level at 4 weeks after conversion. Because dose adjustments were performed, the trough level did not differ significantly between baseline and 24 weeks after conversion. At 4 and 24 weeks after conversion, the homeostasis model assessment of pancreas β-cell function (HOMA-β) increased significantly.

Conclusions

Although there was no change in tacrolimus trough level between baseline and 24 weeks after transplantation, HOMA-β at 24 weeks after conversion was significantly higher than that at baseline. These results indicated that conversion from Tac-BID to Tac-OD may improve pancreas β-cell function in kidney transplant recipients.     

Safety and Efficacy of Once-Daily Modified-Release Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Interim Analysis of Multicenter Postmarketing Surveillance in Japan

Introduction

Modified-release formulation of tacrolimus (TAC-MR) has been developed with the intent of improving patient adherence and quality of life. A number of studies have indicated that the efficacy and safety of once-daily TAC-MR were comparable with those of the original formulation, twice-daily TAC. However, its dosage, trough level, safety, and efficacy in the multicenter clinical experience of Japanese kidney transplant recipients have not been reported.

Methods

This post-marketing surveillance designed as an open-label, prospective, noncomparative, noninterventional observational study was performed. The 256 patients were enrolled for de novo transplantation, and the 106 patients were enrolled for conversion to TAC-MR from 52 medical institutions in Japan. The follow-up period in de novo transplantation was 5 years, but here we report the results of the 24-week interim analysis. The observation period in conversion was 24 weeks.

Results

Regarding de novo transplantation, the median daily TAC-MR dose was 0.150 mg/kg/d at the initial administration and the median TAC trough level was 12.1 ng/mL at 3 days. The common adverse drug reactions were infections, renal disorders, and glucose tolerance disorders at incidence rates of 23.6%, 6.8%, and 5.6%, respectively. Both patient and graft survival rates at 24 weeks were 98.2% and the rejection rate was 16.1%. Regarding conversion to TAC-MR, the median conventional TAC dose before conversion was 3.2 mg/d, and the median TAC-MR dose at the converted day was 3.2 mg/d. The median TAC trough level was 5.4 ng/mL before conversion, and it was 5.2 ng/mL after conversion. The most common adverse drug reactions were infections at an incidence rate of 4.9%. There was 1 graft loss and death, and there was 1 episode of rejection.

Conclusion

This interim analysis shows that a TAC-MR–based immunosuppressive regimen is safe and effective as used in Japanese clinical practice.     

The Impact of Conversion From Prograf to Generic Tacrolimus in Liver and Kidney Transplant Recipients With Stable Graft Function

Bioequivalence of the recently available generic tacrolimus formulation, manufactured by Sandoz, to the reference product (Prograf; Astellas Pharma, Tokyo, Japan) has been demonstrated in healthy subjects. However, the safety and efficacy of substitution with generic tacrolimus in transplant patients have not been evaluated. Tacrolimus trough concentrations and indices of liver and kidney function were recorded before and after generic substitution in 48 liver and 55 kidney transplant recipients. In liver transplant patients, the mean tacrolimus concentration/dose (C/D) ratio (±SD) was 184.1 (±123.2) ([ng/mL]/[mg/kg/day]) for the reference product and 154.7 (±87.8) ([ng/mL]/[mg/kg/day]) for the generic product (p < 0.05). The mean C/D‐ratios in kidney transplant patients were 125.3 (±92.7) and 110.4 (±79.2) ([ng/mL]/[mg/kg/day]) for the reference and generic products, respectively (p < 0.05). Actual trough concentrations declined by an average of 1.98 ng/mL in liver and 0.87 ng/mL in kidney transplant patients following the switch, after accounting for all significant covariates. No change was observed in biochemical indices of liver or kidney function and no cases of acute rejection occurred following the substitution. These results suggest that transplant patients currently taking the reference tacrolimus formulation may be safely switched to the Sandoz‐generic product provided trough concentrations are closely monitored following the substitution.     

Once-daily tacrolimus extended release formulation: experience at 2 years postconversion from a Prograf-based regimen in stable liver transplant recipients

Compliance with complex immunosuppressant drug therapies in transplant recipients might be improved with regimens that require less frequent dosing. A once-daily extended release (XL) formulation of tacrolimus has been developed that allows a 1:1 conversion from the twice-a-day tacrolimus (TAC) formulation and has a good exposure to trough concentration correlation. In an open-label, multicenter study, stable liver transplant recipients (n=69) were converted from twice-a-day TAC to XL once-daily in the morning, and were maintained for at least 2 years postconversion using the same therapeutic monitoring and patient care techniques employed with TAC. Two years after conversion, the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was 5.8% (4 of 69); patient and graft survival was 98.6% (68 of 69). The safety profile of XL was consistent with that previously reported for TAC. Liver transplant recipients can be converted from twice-a-day TAC to once-daily XL and maintained for at least 2 years postconversion with neither unique efficacy nor safety concerns.     

Significant reduction of Tacrolimus trough level after conversion from twice daily Prograf to once daily Advagraf in Chinese renal transplant recipients with or without concomitant diltiazem treatment

Abstract

A dose ratio of 1:1 was recommended for the conversion from Standard-release Tacrolimus (Prograf) to Prolonged-release Tacrolimus (Advagraf). We investigated the trough tacrolimus blood level in Chinese kidney transplant recipients after conversion, including subjects receiving concomitant treatment with diltiazem. Eighteen stable renal allograft recipients were followed prospectively for 12 weeks after conversion from Prograf to Advagraf at the same daily dose. Tacrolimus blood trough level decreased significantly within 8 weeks after conversion (p?<?0.01). Twelve patients required escalation of the Advagraf dose by 1.10?±?0.36?mg. For the whole group the daily tacrolimus dose was increased from 0.057?±?0.032?mg/kg to 0.068?±?0.033?mg/kg (p?<?0.0001). At week 12 the daily dose of Advagraf was 127?±?32% of the original daily dose of Prograf. In the subgroup of patients receiving diltiazem, their tacrolimus trough level decreased significantly after conversion (p?=?0.001), and the daily tacrolimus dose was increased from 0.060?±?0.036?mg/kg to 0.073?±?0.036?mg/kg (p?<?0.0001). At week 12, their daily dose of Advagraf was 131?±?34% of the original daily dose before conversion. To conclude, conversion from Prograf to Advagraf in renal allograft recipients with or without diltiazem co-treatment necessitated an increase in the daily dose by approximately 30% to maintain the target blood trough level unchanged.     

Conversion of Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients From a Twice-Daily to Once-Daily Everolimus Regimen

Once-daily everolimus administration is a further option to improve compliance to immunosuppressive therapy. We randomized 23 stable kidney transplant recipients already on everolimus therapy to receive a single daily morning dose or to continue the twice-daily regimen. The everolimus levels evaluated after 2 weeks showed a slight reduction from 5.13 ± 1.61 ng/mL at baseline to 4.76 ± 1.61 ng/mL, which was not statistically significant. After 2 weeks we also evaluated cyclosporine (CsA) levels together with renal function parameters, neither of which showed episodes, any difference between the converted versus twice-daily groups. We did not record any adverse event, such as an infection, an acute rejection episode, or graft loss, over the 6-month study period. Single dosing of everolimus is possible and safe and may achieve better patient compliance to multiple-drug immunosuppressive therapy.     

Initial liver graft function is a reliable predictor of tacrolimus trough levels during the first post‐transplant week

Lock JF, Malinowski M, Schwabauer E, Martus P, Pratschke J, Seehofer D, Puhl G, Neuhaus P, Stockmann M. Initial liver graft function is a reliable predictor of tacrolimus trough levels during the first post‐transplant week.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: 436–443. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: The narrow therapeutic range of tacrolimus requires careful management after liver transplantation (LT). The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of graft function on tacrolimus trough levels during the first post‐transplant week. Ninety‐three patients receiving deceased‐donor LT were observed in a prospective observational study. Graft function was determined by the new LiMAx test (maximal liver function capacity). Significant correlations between LiMAx readouts and consecutive tacrolimus levels, up to r = ?0.529 (p < 0.0001), were determined throughout the observed period of time. Patients with initially poor graft function revealed higher trough levels (n = 24; 20.1 ± 11.6 ng/mL) in comparison with fair (n = 40; 13.7 ± 7.8 ng/mL) and good function (n = 29; 9.5 ± 4.4 ng/mL; p < 0.0001) already at the second post‐transplant day. Toxic levels could be predicted with an area under receiver operating characteristic analysis AUROC=0.751 (p = 0.001) with high sensitivity and specificity. Insufficient levels could be predicted with AUROC=0.800 (p = 0.003). In conclusion, initial graft function is a major factor influencing the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and can be validly determined by the LiMAx test. Thus, recipients with poor functioning grafts are prone of developing toxic levels within the first week after LT, whereas patients with good functioning grafts frequently develop insufficient levels with the current immunosuppressive protocols.     

Calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal and conversion to mycophenolate mofetil and steroids in cardiac transplant recipients with chronic renal failure: a word of caution

Abstract: Background: Chronic renal failure (CRF) is a common complication of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)‐based immunosuppression following cardiac transplantation (HTx). The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the impact of an immunosuppressive conversion from CNIs to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids in cardiac transplant recipients with CRF on renal and cardiac graft function. Methods: Since 1999, 12 HTx recipients (10 men; 58 ± 3.6 yr of age; 8.7 ± 4.2 yr after HTx) with CNI‐based immunosuppression and a calculated creatinine clearance (CreaCl) <50 mL/min were included. Most patients (10/12) were on cyclosporine and two patients were on tacrolimus prior inclusion. MMF was started with 0.5 g/d and adjusted according to the target trough levels (2–4 ng/mL). Prednisone dosage was 0.4 mg/kg. Subsequently, CNIs were completely withdrawn. Acute rejection episodes were excluded one and three months after conversion by endomyocardial biopsy and by echocardiography every three months thereafter. Results: After a mean follow‐up of 20 ± 16 months, CreaCl improved significantly: pre‐conversion vs. post‐conversion: 32.8 ± 12.2 mg/dL vs. 42.8 ± 21.14 mg/dL, p = 0.03. However, four acute rejection episodes occurred and patients were reconverted to CNIs. Additionally, six patients had a new onset of graft vessel disease (GVD) one yr after conversion. As a result of these adverse events, the study was stopped after inclusion of only 12 of the scheduled 30 patients. Conclusions: Conversion to MMF and steroids after HTx improves renal function, but increases the risk for recurrent rejection and GVD. Therefore, MMF and steroids should only be considered in patients with a markedly low risk for rejection.     

Efficacy and Safety of Conversion from Twice‐daily to Once‐daily Tacrolimus in a Large Cohort of Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients

Prolonged‐release tacrolimus was developed to provide a more convenient once‐daily dosing that could improve patient adherence. We conducted a multicenter, prospective, observational, 12‐month study to describe the efficacy, safety and patient preference of conversion from tacrolimus twice‐daily to once‐daily formulation in stable kidney transplant recipients in routine clinical practice. Conversion was made on a 1 mg: 1 mg basis (1 mg: 1.1 mg in patients with trough levels <6 ng/mL). The study included 1832 patients (mean age (±SD): 50.0 ± 13.4 years; 62.7% male). After conversion, a modest reduction in tacrolimus trough levels, necessitating an increase in daily dose, was observed (mean changes at 12 months of –9.1% and +1.24%, respectively; p < 0.0001). Mean glomerular filtration rate did not change significantly (56.5 ± 19.7 mL/min at conversion vs. 55.7 ± 20.6 mL/min at 12 months). Proteinuria, blood pressure, lipid, hepatic and glucose parameters remained stable. Eight patients (0.4%) had acute rejection and 34 patients (1.85%) discontinued treatment. Almost all patients (99.4%) preferred the once‐daily formulation, because of less frequent dosing (66%) and improved adherence (34%). In conclusion, at similar doses to twice‐daily tacrolimus, once‐daily formulation provided stable renal function, a low acute rejection rate, and good tolerability in stable kidney transplant recipients in the routine clinical practice setting.     

A prospective, multicenter study of once-daily extended-release tacrolimus in de novo liver transplant recipients

To minimize noncompliance in organ transplantation, a new formulation was developed of once-daily extended-release (EXTD) tacrolimus. To analyze the efficacy and safety of this new drug formulation in de novo liver transplant recipients, a prospective, multicenter study was performed in six centers in Spain. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes (BPAR) according to the BANFF criteria during the first 3 months of immunosuppression with the EXTD formulation of tacrolimus. Fifty-two patients received a mean initial dose of 10.0 ± 3.8 mg that was gradually reduced to 7.1 ± 4.0 mg, achieving stable mean blood levels of 8.6 ± 3.7 ng/mL at 3 months. BPAR was reported in seven (13%) patients, but patient and graft survivals were 100%. After transplantation liver function improved and was stably maintained throughout the study. At 3 months, mean bilirubin levels were 2.1 ± 5.5 mg/dL and mean alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase were 61.6 ± 75.2 U/L and 55.2 ± 76.9 U/L, respectively. Mean serum creatinine of 0.8 ± 0.3 mg/dL pretransplant increased to 1.1 ± 0.4 mg/dL after 3 months (P < .0001). There was no significant increase in the rate of hypertension from pretransplant levels: 30% at baseline versus 31% at 3 months. Mean glucose levels did not change significantly throughout the study. There were no cases of hepatitis C virus relapse. EXTD tacrolimus demonstrated excellent stability in blood trough levels with a good efficacy and safety profile in de novo liver transplant recipients that was similar to the well-described properties of standard-release twice-daily formulation of tacrolimus.     

Review of the clinical experience with a modified release form of tacrolimus [FK506E (MR4)] in transplantation

Abstract:  Non-compliance in solid transplantation recipients is a major factor in acute graft rejection, which influences patient survival. Nowadays, tacrolimus is one of the most widely used immunosuppressant agents together with cyclosporine following kidney and liver transplantation with a standardized twice-daily dosing regimen. To improve the patients' compliance to the prescribed immunosuppressive therapy, FK506E (MR4), a modified release (MR) oral dosage form of tacrolimus has been developed for a once-daily dosing regimen. This report reviews the most recent results of clinical trials with MR tacrolimus after kidney and liver transplantation.     

Observations regarding the use of sirolimus and tacrolimus in high-risk cadaveric renal transplantation

BACKGROUND: Balancing the risk of acute rejection (AR) with drug-induced toxicities complicates the selection of the optimal immunosuppressive regimen, especially in the high-risk renal transplant recipient. This study was designed to determine the optimal dosage combinations of tacrolimus and sirolimus in a high-risk cadaveric renal transplant population. METHODS: Primary cadaveric renal transplant recipients were randomly assigned to receive either standard tacrolimus (trough levels of 10-15 ng/mL) plus reduced sirolimus (trough levels of 5-10 ng,mL) (Group I) or to receive reduced tacrolimus (trough levels of 5-10 ng,mL) plus standard sirolimus (trough levels of 10-15 ng/mL) (Group II). All patients received Thymoglobulin induction and steroids. RESULTS: Thirty-nine (16 in Group I and 23 in Group II) high-risk renal transplant recipients (100% cadaveric donors, 79% African-American recipients, and 59% delayed graft function) are the subjects of this report. At 6 months, the patient survival rate was 94 and 100% and the graft survival rate was 94 and 83% in Groups I and II, respectively. The incidence of biopsy-proven AR was 6 and 5% in Groups I and II, respectively. Eight patients (50%) in Group I required discontinuation of tacrolimus, seven because of biopsy-proven tacrolimus nephrotoxicity and one secondarily to interstitial pneumonitis. Wound complications were the most frequent adverse event reported in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of tacrolimus and sirolimus was associated with a low risk of AR in this cohort of high-risk renal transplant recipients. However, 50% of patients who received standard tacrolimus and reduced sirolimus combination had to be discontinued from the regimen because of biopsy-proven nephrotoxicity. These preliminary results provide evidence that sirolimus should not be added to tacrolimus without dosage adjustments. We have discontinued recruitment of patients to the standard tacrolimus and reduced sirolimus combination and we have tightened our criteria for selection of marginal donor kidneys with our high-risk renal transplant recipients.     

Reduced Variability of Tacrolimus Trough Level in Once-Daily Tacrolimus-Based Taiwanese Kidney Transplant Recipients With High-Expressive Genotype of Cytochrome P450 3A5

Background

Our previous study results indicated that conversion from twice-daily Prograf to once-daily Advagraf associated with lower variability of tacrolimus blood trough level. Some factors, such as frequency of interaction by food exposure, expression of cytochrome P450 3A5 genetic polymorphism, and other interactions of unknown factors, could be the reasons for the change of variability. We aimed to clarify the impact of cytochrome P450 3A5 genetic polymorphism on the variability of tacrolimus blood trough level in Taiwanese kidney transplant recipients.

Methods

We collected blood samples from kidney transplant recipients to prepare DNA and then performed single-nucleotide polymorphism genotyping by using the restriction fragment length polymorphism.

Results

We found that 79 (52.7%) of 150 kidney transplant recipients had the low-expressive genotype (CYP3A5*3/*3), whereas the other 71 (47.3%) kidney transplant recipients had high-expressive genotype (CYP3A5*1/*1 and CYP3A5*1/*3). The prevalence of high-expressive genotype is higher than previous reports from western countries. Compared with the patients with high-expressive genotype, the average dose-normalized trough level of tacrolimus was significantly higher in patients with low-expressive genotype. Interestingly, when patients converted from twice-daily Prograf to once-daily Advagraf, the percent coefficient of variation of tacrolimus trough level was significantly decreased in patients with high-expressive genotype.

Conclusion

This study suggested that there is a potential benefit for kidney transplant recipients with cytochrome P450 3A5 high-expressive genotype (*1/*1 or *1/*3) to convert from Prograf to once-daily Advagraf.     

A randomized trial of three renal transplant induction antibodies: early comparison of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroid dosing, and newer immune-monitoring

BACKGROUND: New trends in immunosuppression in clinical transplantation include the use of antibody induction agents in protocols that emphasize reduction or avoidance of steroids and calcineurin inhibitors. METHODS: In a randomized trial using three different antibody induction agents in 90 first renal transplant recipients from cadaver donors, group A received Thymoglobulin, group B received Alemtuzumab, and group C received Daclizumab. Maintenance immunosuppression included tacrolimus and mycophenolate in all three arms, and methylprednisolone in groups A and C only (standard clinical institutional practice). The targeted trough level of tacrolimus was between 8 and 10 ng/mL for groups A and C, respectively, with a targeted mycophenolate dose of 1 g twice daily. However, in group B, the target tacrolimus trough level was 4 to 7 ng/mL to reduce long-term nephrotoxicity, with 500 mg twice-daily doses of mycophenolate, without steroid maintenance. RESULTS: In this 15-month median postoperative interval report, there were no notable differences in demographics and patient and graft survivals. Acute rejection rates at 1 year were equivalent, that is, 5 of 30 in all three groups (16.6%). In group B, there was slightly lower renal function at 1 month, but no difference at 1 year. There was also significantly more leukopenia, but a greater percentage of T-regulatory cells and number of Fox-P3 mRNA copies by flow cytometry and semiquantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis, respectively, in group B. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary analysis indicates that 80% of the patients in group B remained steroid-free 1 year postoperatively, with lower tacrolimus trough levels and no difference in other adverse events.     

Delayed Introduction of Reduced-Dose Tacrolimus, and Renal Function in Liver Transplantation: The 'ReSpECT' Study

We report a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label trial investigating the effect of lower levels and delayed introduction of tacrolimus on renal function in liver transplant recipients. Adult patients with good renal function undergoing primary liver transplant were randomized to either: group A (standard-dose tacrolimus [target trough levels >10 ng/mL] and corticosteroids; n = 183); group B (mycophenolate mofetil [MMF] 2g/day, reduced-dose tacrolimus [target trough levels ≤8 ng/mL], and corticosteroids; n = 170); group C (daclizumab induction, MMF, reduced-dose tacrolimus delayed until the fifth day posttransplant and corticosteroids, n = 172). The primary endpoint was change from baseline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 52 weeks. The eGFR decreased by 23.61, 21.22 and 13.63 mL/min in groups A, B and C, respectively (A vs C, p = 0.012; A vs B, p = 0.199). Renal dialysis was required less frequently in group C versus group A (4.2% vs. 9.9%; p = 0.037). Biopsy-proven acute rejection rates were 27.6%, 29.2% and 19.0%, respectively. Patient and graft survival was similar. In conclusion, daclizumab induction, MMF, corticosteroids and delayed reduced-dose tacrolimus was associated with less nephrotoxicity than therapy with standard-dose tacrolimus and corticosteroids without compromising efficacy or tolerability.