Kidney Transplantation: Improvement in Patient and Graft Survival

Patient and graft survival were reviewed in a series of 249 kidney transplants done from 1963 to March 1973. Patient survival was calculated by the life table method for the periods 1963-1970, and 1970-1973, since in 1970 a formal Kidney Center was established and mortality rates changed. Graft survival was analyzed in terms of donor source, HL-A matching and immune responsiveness to HL-A antigens. Three-year predicted mortality for cadaver kidney recipients was 62% between 1963 and 1969 (42 patients) and 8% between 1970 anid 1973 (67 patients). Similar predicted mortality for related living donors was 30% between 1963 and 1969 (52 patients) and 14% between 1970 and 1973 (85 patients). Mortality has continued to decrease and there has been only one death in the last 87 consecutive transplants, including 57 consecutive cadaver transplants. Oneyear predicted kidney survival for the 10-year period is 44% for cadaveric, 60% for non HL-A identical related living and 90% for HL-A identical sibling donors. In the cadaver group, those sharing 2 or more HL-A antigens had the same kidney survival as the non HL-A identical related living donor grafts. Since cadaver graft recipients are on dialysis for a longer period of time, immune responsiveness can be detected by their response to blood transfusions, whereas this determination could not be made in our related living donor group. Non-responsive cadaver kidney recipients had 80% one year kidney survival. We conclude that transplant mortality can be reduced to less than 10% by the Center approach to treatment of renal disease, dialysis does not adversely affect future transplantation, and excellent (80%) kidney survival can be expected in properly selected cadaver graft recipients.     

Kidney Transplantation Significantly Improves Patient and Graft Survival Irrespective of BMI: A Cohort Study

Obesity and end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) are on the increase worldwide. Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for ESRD. However, obesity is considered a contraindication for transplantation. We investigated the effect of BMI on mortality in transplanted and patients remaining on the waiting list in the United Kingdom. We analyzed the UK Renal Registry (RR) and the National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) Organ Donation and Transplantation data for patients listed from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2010, with follow‐up until December 31, 2011. Seventeen thousand six hundred eighty‐one patients were listed during the study period, with BMI recorded for 13 526 (77%). One‐ and five‐year patient survival was significantly better in all BMI bands (<18.5, 18.5–<25, 25–<30, 30–<35, 35–<40, and 40+kg/m²) in the transplant group when compared to those who remained on the waiting list (p < 0.0001). The analyses were repeated excluding live donor transplants and the results were essentially the same. On analyses of patient survival with BMI as a continuous variable or using 5 kg weight bands, there was no cut‐off observed in the higher BMI patients where there would be no benefit to transplantation. For transplanted patients (N = 8088), there was no difference in patient or graft survival between the defined BMI bands. Thus, irrespective of BMI, patient survival is improved if transplanted.     

Kidney Transplantation: Graft Monitoring and Immunosuppression

Renal transplantation has become the preferred means of treating end-stage renal disease. Episodes of allograft rejection have become the exception rather than the rule. The development of real-time ultrasound-guided allograft biopsy and adoption of the Banff criteria for histologic evaluation permit safe,accurate monitoring of graft histology. New immunosuppressive agents have drastically reduced the number of episodes of both primary and refractory rejection. Novel biologic agents in the form of monoclonal antibodies and soluble receptor hybrid molecules may serve to reduce the required doses of toxic chemical immunosuppressants and provide more specific immune suppression directed at those elements of the immune system involved in rejection of a given allograft. Development of assays to identify patients who demonstrate donor antigen-specific hyporeactivity is now feasible. Hopefully, these assays will serve as a guide for the reduction and possible removal of immunosuppressive agents from stable renal allograft recipients.     

Diabetes Mellitus as Predictor of Patient and Graft Survival After Kidney Transplantation

Background

In this study, we used a single-center database to examine the risks of renal transplantation in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). We aimed to compare 1-year outcomes of survival and morbidity after renal transplantation among recipients with and without DM.

Methods

We reviewed retrospectively 1211 adult patients who underwent renal transplantation from January 2001 to December 2010. The patients were divided into 2 groups: Those with (33%) and those without (67%) pretransplant diabetes. Unpaired Student's t tests and χ² tests were used to compare outcomes between diabetic and nondiabetic renal transplant recipients. We analyzed survival, renal function, development of proteinuria, rejection, and infection (requiring hospitalization).

Results

Patients with diabetes were older, had a greater body mass index (mean, 29.5 vs 25.3 kg/m²; P < .05), and had lower creatinine clearance (44.2 ± 11.4 vs 56.0 ± 18.2; P = .01). Forty-one patients died in hospital (3.4%; P = nonsignificant). Furthermore, survival rates were similar between these 2 groups. However, we found a trend toward decreased survival for those with DM at 1 year (80.4% vs 88.7%; P = .20). Mean follow-up time was 3.2 years. Infection rate within 6 months was greater among those with DM (19% vs 5%; odds ratio, 6.25). Freedom from rejection at 3 years was similar (75.2% vs 76.8%; P = .57). Multivariate analysis showed increased baseline creatinine level as a significant risk factor for survival. Body mass index >30 kg/m² was a significant risk factor for survival among patients with DM.

Conclusion

We found an increased risk of serious infections in patients with DM, particularly within the first 6 months. However, our data suggest that diabetes is not associated with worse 1-year survival or higher morbidity in renal transplant patients, as long as good blood glucose control is maintained.     

Kidney Transplantation With Corticosteroid-Free Maintenance Immunosuppression: A Single Center Analysis of Graft and Patient Survivals

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of a corticosteroid-free maintenance immunosuppression on graft survival in kidney transplantation. We analyzed 79 patients who were transplanted between June 1, 2006 and May 31, 2007. We excluded hyperimmunized patients, second transplantations, living donors, and black recipients. Patients underwent induction with thymoglobulin or basiliximab, followed by treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), tacrolimus, and methylprednisolone. On the 5th day, the patients were divided into 2 groups: group A (n = 45) discontinued steroid therapy; group B (n = 34) continued prednisone therapy. We performed a comparative analysis of incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection episodes (ARE), renal function at 6 and 12 months, graft and patient survivals, causes of graft loss, and mortality. The 2 groups were similar for donor, recipient, and graft characteristics. The incidences of DGF were 8.9% in group A and 14.7% in group B; those for ARE were 2.3% in group A and 13.8% in group B (P = .077). The mean serum creatinine levels at 6 and 12 months were similar. There were 8 graft losses: 3 in group A (3 deaths with functioning grafts) and 5 in group B (1 death, 3 vascular causes, 1 kidney nonfunction). The 4 deaths were due to infection (n = 3) or neoplasia (n = 1). Graft survivals at 1 year were 98% in group A and 85% in group B, and patient survivals were 98% and 97%, respectively. An immunosuppressive regimen using antibody induction and steroid-free treatment proved to be effective in low-risk patients.     

Long-Term Graft and Patient Outcomes Following Kidney Transplantation in End-Stage Kidney Disease Secondary to Hyperoxaluria

BackgroundEnd-stage kidney disease secondary to hyperoxaluria presents a major challenge for transplant physicians given concern regarding disease recurrence. Few contemporary studies have reported long-term outcomes following transplantation in this population.MethodsThis study examined the outcomes of all adult patients with end-stage kidney disease secondary to hyperoxaluria who received a kidney or combined liver-kidney transplant in Australia and New Zealand between 1965 and 2015. Patients with hyperoxaluria were propensity score matched to control patients with reflux nephropathy. The primary outcome was graft survival. Secondary outcomes included graft function, acute rejection, and patient survival.ResultsNineteen transplants performed in 16 patients with hyperoxaluria were matched to 57 transplants in patients with reflux nephropathy. Graft survival was inferior in patients with hyperoxaluria receiving a kidney transplant alone (subhazard ratio [SHR] = 3.83, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-12.08, P = .02) but not in those receiving a combined liver-kidney transplant (SHR = 0.63, 95% CI, 0.08-5.21, P = .67). Graft failure risk was particularly high in patients with hyperoxaluria receiving a kidney transplant alone after more than 1 year of renal replacement therapy (SHR = 8.90, 95% CI, 2.35-33.76, P = .001). Posttransplant estimated glomerular filtration rate was lower in patients with hyperoxaluria (10.97 mL/min/1.73 m², 95% CI, 0.53-21.42, P = .04). There was no difference between groups in the risk of acute rejection or death with a functioning graft.ConclusionCompared to reflux nephropathy, hyperoxaluria was associated with inferior graft survival in patients receiving a kidney transplant alone. Long-term graft function was lower in patients with hyperoxaluria, but the risks of acute rejection and death were not different.     

Graft and Patient Survival in Kidney Transplant Recipients Selected for de novo Steroid-Free Maintenance Immunosuppression

Steroid-free regimen is increasingly employed in kidney transplant recipients across transplant centers. However, concern remains because of the unknown impact of such an approach on long-term graft and patient survival. We studied the outcomes of steroid-free immunosuppression in a population-based U.S. cohort of kidney transplant recipients. All adult solitary kidney transplant recipients engrafted between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2006 were stratified according to whether they were selected for a steroid-free or steroid-containing regimen at discharge. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to estimate graft and patient survival. The impact of the practice pattern on steroid use at individual transplant centers was analyzed. Among 95 755 kidney transplant recipients, 17.2% were steroid-free at discharge (n = 16 491). Selection for a steroid-free regimen was associated with reduced risks for graft failure and death at 1 year (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.72–0.85, and HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.65–0.82, respectively, p < 0.0001) and 4 years (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.78–0.87, and HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.71–0.83, respectively, p < 0.0001). This association was mostly observed at individual centers where less than 65% of recipients were discharged on the steroid-containing regimen. De novo steroid-free immunosuppression as currently practiced in the United States appears to carry no increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes in the intermediate term.     

Risk Factors Associated With Graft Loss and Patient Survival After Kidney Transplantation

Objective

To evaluate the influence of traditional risk factors on major kidney transplantation outcome.

Patients and Methods

Data from kidney transplantation procedures performed between 2003 and 2006 were retrospectively analyzed for the influence of traditional risk factors on transplantation outcome. Of 2364 transplants, 67% were from living donors, 27% were from donors who met standard criteria, and 6% were from donor who met expanded criteria. Two hundred thirty-nine procedures (10%) were performed in pediatric patients. Immunosuppression was selected on the basis of subgroup population.

Results

At 1 year posttransplantation, cumulative freedom from a treated acute rejection episode (ARE) was 76.7%, with no difference between black vs nonblack recipients (75.0% vs 73.4%; P = .79). At 2 years, survival for patients (95.3% vs 88.3% vs 82.1%; P < .001) and grafts 92.3% vs 80.3% vs 70.9%; P < .001) was better in recipients of living donor grafts compared with donors who met standard or expanded criteria, respectively. Moreover, graft survival was poorer in black vs nonblack patients (83.6% vs 88.7%; P < .05) because of high mortality (13% vs 7%; P<.001). Risk factors associated with death included cadaveric donor organ (odds ratio [OR], 2.4) and black race (OR, 1.8), and risk factors associated with graft loss included cadaveric donor organ (OR, 2.1), extended-criteria criteria donor organ (OR, 2.0), delayed graft function (OR, 1.8), and any ARE (OR, 3.5). At 6 months posttransplantation, risk factors associated with death included cadaveric donor organ (OR, 2.5) or ARE (OR, 2.4), and risk factors associated with graft loss included cadaveric donor organ (OR, 2.0), extended-criteria donor organ (OR, 2.6), ARE (OR, 9.5), and impaired graft function (creatinine concentration >1.5 mg/dL; OR, 2.1).

Conclusion

Traditional risk factors are still associated with transplantation outcome. Poorer graft survival in black vs nonblack recipients was due to higher mortality rather than graft loss.     

Long-Term Outcomes of Kidney Paired Donation Transplantation: A Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study

BackgroundThis study aimed to compare the kidney paired donation (KPD) program recipients with the traditional living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) recipients regarding patient and graft survival.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 141 recipients of the KPD program and 141 classic LDKT recipients that we matched for age and sex as controls between July 2005 and June 2019. We compared the 2 transplant groups for patient and kidney survival using the Kaplan-Maier test. We also performed Cox Regression analysis to examine factors affecting patient survival, including transplant type.ResultsThe average follow-up period was 96.17 ± 44.22 months. Of the 282 patients, 88 died in the follow-up period. There was no statistically significant difference in graft and patient survival between the KPD and LDKT groups. In the Cox regression model, including the transplant type, only the serum creatinine level measured in the first month after discharge was a significant factor in predicting patient survival.ConclusionsThe findings of this study indicate that the KPD program is an effective and reliable method to increase LDKT. Country-wide multicentric studies should confirm the results of this study. In countries where cadaver transplantation is insufficient, efforts should be made to expand the KPD program.     

Patient and Graft Survival Implications of Simultaneous Pancreas Kidney Transplantation From Old Donors

We investigated graft and patient survival implications of simultaneous pancreas kidney (SPK) transplant from old donors. Data describing patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus listed for an SPK transplant from 1994 to 2005 were drawn from Organ Procurement and Transplant Network registries. Allograft survival, patient survival and long-term survival expectations among SPK recipients from young (age <45 years) and old (age >/=45 years) donors were modeled by multivariate regression. We also examined predictors of reduced early access to young donor transplants. Of 16 496 eligible SPK candidates, 8850 patients (53.6%) received an SPK transplant and 776 (8.8%) of these transplants were from old donors. Reasonable 5-year, death-censored kidney (77.8 %) and pancreas (71.3%) survivals were achieved with old donors. SPK transplantation from both young and old donors predicted lower mortality compared to continued waiting. An additional expected wait of 1.5 years for a young donor equalized long-term survival expectations to that achieved with use of old donors. Early allocation of young donor transplants declined in the more recent era and varied by region, candidate age, blood type and sensitization. We conclude that old SPK donors should be considered for patients with decreased access to young donor transplants. Prospective evaluation of this practice is needed.     

Improved Late Graft Survival and Half-Lives in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation: A Single Center Experience

We evaluated variables associated with improved late graft survival in 290 children transplanted between 11/1/1984 and 12/31/1997, and who had > 1 year graft survival. We studied the following variables: age, gender, race, primary disease (diseases prone to recurrence, i.e. hemolytic uremic syndrome, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis or oxalosis vs. others), primary vs. retransplant; donor source, acute tubular necrosis, acute rejection episodes in the first year, transplant era and discharge serum creatinine. Graft half-life was defined as the time taken for 1/2 of the grafts functioning at 1 year to fail. There were 205 living donor and 85 cadaveric transplant. The cumulative graft survival at 5 and 10 years was 88% and 75% for living donor, and 72% and 46% for cadaveric, respectively. Multivariate analyses showed a higher late graft survival to be associated with: no acute rejection episodes (risk ratio 0.16, p = 0.0001), age 2-5 years (risk ratio 0.24, p = 0.0007), living donor (risk ratio 0.46, p = 0.017), primary nonrecurrent disease (risk ratio 0.29, p = 0.001), Caucasian race (risk ratio 0.40, p = 0.006). A high half-life was seen with living donor transplant (21.3 years) and the age group 2-5 years (27.5 years). Further, living donor patients with no acute rejection episodes had the best half-life of 37.6 years, while children with hemolytic uremic syndrome, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis or oxalosis had the lowest overall half-life of 5.6 years. This study finds that living donor, no acute rejection episodes, age 2-5 years, Caucasian race and having a disease not prone to recurrence are strong predictors of late graft survival. Hence, preferential use of living donor and prevention of acute rejection episodes in the first year are key variables that can improve long-term renal graft survival in children.     

Retrospective Analysis of the Kidney Donor Profile Index to Predict Patient and Graft Survival at 5 Years Posttransplantation in a Colombian Cohort

BackgroundThe Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) has been used to predict patient and graft outcomes in deceased donor kidney transplantation. We aimed to evaluate the impact of KDPI on transplantation major outcomes applied to a Colombian cohort.MethodsWe retrospectively assessed 260 adult patients who underwent kidney transplantation (KT) from January 2011 to June 2014 at our center and compared their KDPIs with graft and patient outcomes at 5 years posttransplantation. Kaplan-Meier survival method and Cox analysis were fitted to analyze the impact of the 3 KDPI categories on graft and patient outcomes.ResultsA total of 18.4% of transplants were from donors with a KDPI ≥75%. There was a significant decrement in renal function with increasing KDPI at 5 years posttransplantation (P < .05). The final model indicates that donor diabetes was associated with elevated risk for graft loss (hazard ratio [HR], 6.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-31.8; P = .019) at 5 years posttransplantation. Recipient age (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1-4.5; P = .001), diabetes status (HR, 2.17; CI, 1.04-5.5; P = .003), dialysis duration (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.00-1.16; P = .003), and operating room time (HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.02-2.12; P = .003) were associated with elevated risk for death at 5 years posttransplantation. KDPI categories were not significantly associated with graft loss or death.ConclusionsWe found limited KDPI power to predict graft and patient survival when applied to a Latin American population in Colombia. Our findings highlight the importance of analyzing the application of KDPI in different populations. Therefore, our findings may not be generalizable to other regions outside of Colombia.     

The Impact of Anastomosis Time During Kidney Transplantation on Graft Loss: A Eurotransplant Cohort Study

Recent studies raised the concern that warm ischemia during completion of vascular anastomoses in kidney implantation harms the transplant, but its precise impact on outcome and its interaction with other risk factors remain to be established. We investigated the relationship between anastomosis time and graft survival at 5 years after transplantation in 13 964 recipients of deceased donor solitary kidney transplants in the Eurotransplant region. Anastomosis time was independently associated with graft loss after adjusting for other risk factors (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.10 for every 10‐min increase, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06–1.14; p < 0.0001), whereas it did not influence recipient survival (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.97–1.02). Kidneys from donation after circulatory death (DCD) were less tolerant of prolonged anastomosis time than kidneys from donation after brain death (p = 0.02 for interaction). The additive effect of anastomosis time with donor warm ischemia time (WIT) explains this observation because DCD status was no longer associated with graft survival when adjusted for this summed WIT, and there was no interaction between DCD status and summed WIT. Time to create the vascular anastomoses in kidney transplantation is associated with inferior transplant outcome, especially in recipients of DCD kidneys.     

Appointment Nonadherence and Graft Outcomes in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation

BackgroundMedication nonadherence is associated with worse graft outcomes but is hard to recognize in clinical settings due to its self-reporting nature. We hypothesized that appointment nonadherence might be associated with worse graft outcomes in living donor kidney transplantation.MethodsWe included 167 adult living-donor kidney transplants whose grafts survived >2 years from April 2011 to May 2020. Thirty-two cases of appointment nonadherence were identified and compared with the controls (n = 135).ResultsYounger age, male sex, higher body weight, and parent donor were significantly observed in the appointment nonadherence group. The appointment nonadherence group was significantly associated with worse graft survival (5 years: 82.3% vs 98.9%, P < .001, 10 years: 67.2% vs 89.6%, P < .001), de novo donor-specific antibody production, acute rejection, as well as the decline of graft function. Furthermore, appointment nonadherence had a 4-fold higher risk of graft loss after an adjustment with recipient age, sex, body weight, and donor type (adjusted hazard ratio: 3.93, 95% CI: 1.15-13.42, P = .029).ConclusionsAppointment nonadherence might be an alternative predictor for worse graft outcomes after living donor kidney transplantation.     

Patient and Graft Survival After Dual Kidney Transplantation With Marginal Donors in Comparison to Matched Control Groups

BackgroundPostmortal organ donor rates remain low in Germany, whereas donor age has been increasing considerably in the last decades. As a consequence of low donation rates older and more marginal donor kidneys are accepted for transplantation. However, procured kidneys from very old a/o marginal donors may be considered as not suitable for transplantation as a single organ and subsequently be discarded. However, dual transplantation of both kidneys from such donors may provide an opportunity to nevertheless use these organs for renal transplantation, thereby providing the twofold nephron mass as a single kidney transplantation.MethodsWe compared in this retrospective analysis the outcome of 10 recipients of a dual kidney transplantation (DKT) with 40 matched recipients of a single kidney transplantation (SKT). Recipients were matched for donor and recipient age (ie, a maximum age difference of ±10 years in a ratio of 1:4 for DKT vs SKT recipients). In addition, a second SKT control group of 10 SKT recipients being transplanted immediately before each DKT recipient with a kidney from a donor aged ≥65 years was used for comparison. All renal transplant recipients were observed for up to 3 years or until July 31, 2020.ResultsMean donor and recipient age was 77.2 ± 4.6/75.1 ± 6.6/82.1 ± 7.9 and 66.4 ± 5.8/66.1 ± 6.0/64.8 ± 8.4 for SKT group 1/SKT group 2/DKT, respectively. Procurement serum creatinine concentrations were significantly higher in the DKT group in comparison to the SKT control group 1 (P = .019) as was the rate of transplant artery atherosclerosis (P = .021). Furthermore, Kidney Donor Profile Index, and Kidney Donor Risk Index were significantly higher (P = .0138/P = .064, and P < .001/P = .038) in the DKT group than in SKT group 1 and 2. Rates of acute rejection and delayed graft function were not significantly different between groups, though biopsy-proven acute rejection was numerically higher in the SKT groups. Patient survival and overall and death-censored graft survival rates were also not significantly different between groups, although they tended to be higher after DKT.ConclusionsDKT provides an opportunity to successfully use postmortal kidneys even from donors aged >80 years and a Kidney Donor Profile Index ≥95% for renal transplantation. DKT may thereby increase the available pool of donors to better serve patients with end-stage renal disease on the waiting list.     

Association Between Mannose-Binding Lectin Levels and Graft Survival in Kidney Transplantation

The mannose-binding lectin (MBL) pathway of complement is activated by pattern recognition. Genetic MBL variants are frequent and associated with low MBL serum levels. Higher MBL levels may be associated with more complement-mediated damage resulting in inferior graft survival. Pre-transplant serum samples from 266 consecutive deceased donor kidney transplant recipients were analyzed for MBL concentration by ELISA. Subsequently the cohort was analyzed for transplant-related outcome. There was no significant difference in incidence of delayed graft function in recipients with a low MBL level (< or =400 ng/mL) compared to those with a higher MBL level (>400 ng/mL) (37.1 vs. 34.9%). At 10 years, death-censored graft survival was 89.9% in patients with an MBL level below 400 ng/mL compared with 78.8% at a higher MBL level (p < 0.02). Multivariate analysis including traditional risk factors for graft loss showed an independent risk of 2.7 (95% CI 1.2-6.3) for death-censored graft loss if pre-transplant MBL levels were above 400 ng/mL. This difference was almost entirely explained by rejection-associated graft loss (2.4 vs. 12.4%, p < 0.01). Higher MBL levels seem to be associated with a more severe form of rejection leading to treatment failure and graft loss. If these data can be confirmed, pre-transplant MBL levels may provide additional information for risk stratification prior to kidney transplantation.     

Malignancy Diseases in Kidney Transplantation,Clinical Outcomes,Patient, and Allograft Survival: A Case-Control Study

BackgroundMalignancy is a well-known complication in patients after kidney transplantation (KT), but its effect on posttransplant outcomes, allograft, and patient survival remains unexplored. The aim of this study is to report the impact of the comorbidity on clinical outcome, function, and failure of an allograft kidney.MethodsThis case-control study included 101 KT patients. Twenty-six patients who developed cancer (CA) were assigned to the case group and 75 to the control group. Statistical analysis was performed using logistic regression models, and graft survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier curve.ResultsNon-melanoma skin CA was the most common malignancy, accounting for almost 60% of cases, followed by stomach CA, prostate CA, and lymphoproliferative diseases (7.70% each). Difference in graft and patient survival was not significant between the two groups (P > .05). A tumor in nonfunctioning in the first nonfunctioning KT was identified in 1 KT patient with a second allograft and by anatomopathological was detect Fuhrman grade II renal cell carcinoma. This KT patient was in good clinical condition with serum creatinine level of 1.5 mg/dL.ConclusionsNo association was observed between CA development and risk factors, including family history and smoking habit, and no differences in allograft and patient survival were found. Nevertheless, in our data, CA in KT patients occurred early after transplantation. Renal cell carcinoma in allograft failure was identified in a patient; that suggested that nephrectomy of kidney failure must be performed to avoid patient allosensitization and neoplasia. Thus, we suggest continuous screening of malignancy diseases for KT patients.