Impact of ureteral stricture and treatment choice on long‐term graft survival in kidney transplantation

We aimed to evaluate the influence of urological complications occurring within the first year after kidney transplantation on long‐term patient and graft outcomes, and sought to examine the impact of the management approach of ureteral strictures on long‐term graft function. We collected data on urological complications occurring within the first year posttransplant. Graft survivals, patient survival, and rejection rates were compared between recipients with and without urological complications. Male gender of the recipient, delayed graft function, and donor age were found to be significant risk factors for urological complications after kidney transplantation (P < .05). Death censored graft survival analysis showed that only ureteral strictures had a negative impact on long‐term graft survival (P = .0009) compared to other complications. Death censored graft survival was significantly shorter in kidney recipients managed initially with minimally invasive approach when compared to the recipients with no stricture (P = .001). However, graft survival was not statistically different in patients managed initially with open surgery (P = .47). Ureteral strictures following kidney transplantation appear to be strongly negatively correlated with long‐term graft survival. Our analysis suggests that kidney recipients with ureteral stricture should be managed initially with open surgery, with better long‐term graft survival.     

Impact of Predicted Heart Mass–Based Donor-Recipient Size Matching on Transplant Outcomes

BackgroundCurrently, guidelines for appropriate donor sizing in recipients mostly focuses on donor–recipient body weight matching. The purpose is to retrospectively determine the impact of predicted heart mass (pHM)–based size matching on heart transplant (HT) outcomes.MethodsAccording to our institutional registry, 512 consecutive adult patients underwent HT between January 2000 and August 2020. For each patient, pHM and donor-recipient pHM ratio were calculated. Patients were partitioned into quintiles in terms of pHM ratio: undersizing 2, undersizing 1, reference, oversizing 1, and oversizing 2, with mean pHM donor–recipient ratio of 0.81, 0.96, 1.04, 1.12, and 1.28, respectively. Severe early graft failure and 30-day, 90-day, 1-year, and 10-year mortality were analyzed as outcomes.ResultsRecipients of the most oversized group were mostly female (P < .001), had higher preoperative pulmonary vascular resistance (P = .009), had higher rate of mechanical circulatory support (P < .05), and showed a lower United Network for Organ Sharing score (P = .041); the respective donors were younger and more frequently male (P = .001). Ischemic time was similar in all groups (P = .358). Pulmonary vascular resistance (P = .023; odds ratio [OR], 2.38), preoperative mechanical circulatory support (P = .05; OR, 3.06), and United Network for Organ Sharing score (P = .033; OR, 1.76) were identified as risk factors for early mortality. Donor-recipient pHM ratio did not impact early graft failure (P = .871) and early mortality (P = .526). Survival analysis after adjustment for pHM ratio subgroups did not show any difference in outcomes.ConclusionsA wide range of pHM ratios seems to be safe. A careful allocation of organs, by considering a pHM ratio mismatch, may balance rescue preoperative clinical profiles and preserve HT outcomes.     

Postoperative Donor Liver Damage Can Predict Recipient Short-Term Survival in Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BackgroundIn living donor liver transplantation, surgical damage is a risk for graft dysfunction. We hypothesized that postoperative donor laboratory data reflect both donor liver damage and graft damage. Therefore, we evaluated how donor surgical factors affected recipient graft function and prognosis.Patients and MethodsFrom March 2002 to December 2020, 130 consecutive recipients and donors who underwent adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation were analyzed. Donor perioperative surgical factors were evaluated to assess risk factors for recipient 90-day mortality by univariate analysis.ResultsDonor postoperative maximum levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST; P = .016), alanine transaminase (P = .048), and prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (P = .034) were risk factors. Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified 214 U/L as the most appropriate cutoff value of donor postoperative AST.After excluding 22 pairs of patients without donor data, the 108 pairs were divided into 2 groups based on donor maximum AST (D-mAST) level: the low D-mAST group (D-mAST < 241 U/L, n = 39) and the high D-mAST group (D-mAST ≥ 241 U/L, n = 69). Donor age was significantly higher in recipients in the high D-mAST group than in the low D-mAST group (P = .033). Postoperative recipient maximum AST and alanine transaminase levels and 90-day mortality were significantly higher in the high D-mAST group than in the low D-mAST group (P = .001, P = .006, and P = .009, respectively). There were no significant differences in long-term survival, although 5-year survival was slightly lower in the high D-mAST group.ConclusionsSurgical liver damage to grafts, as assessed by postoperative donor AST levels, affected recipient short-term survival.     

Clinical Risk Factors for Primary Graft Dysfunction in a Low-volume Lung Transplantation Center

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a severe acute lung injury syndrome following lung transplantation. Previous studies of clinical risk factors, including a multicenter prospective cohort trial, have identified a number of recipient, donor, and operative variables related to Grade 3 PGD. The aim of this study was to validate these risk factors in a lung transplantation center with a low volume of procedures. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 45 consecutive lung transplantations performed between January 2011 and September 2013. PGD was defined according to the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation grading scale. Risk factors were evaluated independently and the significant confounders entered into multivariable logistic regression models. The overall incidence of Grade 3 PGD was 35.5% at T24, 17.7% at T48, and 15.5% at T72. The following risk factors were associated with Grade 3 PGD at the indicated time points: recipient female gender at T24 (P = .034), mixed diagnoses at T72 (P = .047), ECMO bridge-to-lung transplantation at T24 (P = .0004) and at T48 (P = .038), donor causes of death different from stroke and trauma at T24 (P = .019) and T72 (P = .014), blood transfusions during surgery at T24 (P = .001), intraoperative venoarterial ECMO T24 (P < .0001). Multivariate analysis at T24 identified recipient female gender and intraoperative venoarterial ECMO as risk factors (P = .010 and P = .018, respectively). This study demonstrated that risk factors for severe PGD in a low-volume center were similar to international reports in prevalence and type. ECMO bridge-to-lung transplantation emerged as a risk factor previously underestimated.     

Roux-en-Y Choledochojejunostomy Versus Duct-to-Duct Biliary Anastomosis in Liver Transplantation for Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy and duct-to-duct anastomosis are potential methods for biliary reconstruction in liver transplantation (LT) for recipients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). However, there is controversy over which method yields superior outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of duct-to-duct versus Roux-en-Y biliary anastomosis in patients undergoing LT for PSC.

Methods

Studies comparing Roux-en-Y versus duct-to-duct anastomosis during LT for PSC were identified based on systematic searches of 9 electronic databases and multiple sources of gray literature.

Results

The search identified 496 citations, including 7 retrospective series, and 692 patients met eligibility criteria. The use of duct-to-duct anastomosis was not associated with a significant difference in clinical outcomes, including 1-year recipient survival rates (odds ratio [OR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65–1.60; P = .95), 1-year graft survival rates (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.72–1.71; P = .64), risk of biliary leaks (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.59–2.59; P = .33), risk of biliary strictures (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 0.98–4.06; P = .06), or rate of recurrence of PSC (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.19–4.78; P = .94).

Conclusions

There were no significant differences in 1-year recipient survival, 1-year graft survival, risk of biliary complications, and PSC recurrence between Roux-en-Y and duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis in LT for PSC.     

Risk factors and reasons for revision after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundAs the indications for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) continue to expand, the need for revision surgery after RSA will become more frequent. The objective of this study was to characterize patient-related risk factors for revision RSA and to compare reasons for early vs. late revision after RSA.MethodsPatients who underwent primary and revision RSA from 2015 to 2019 were identified in a national insurance database. Subgroups of early revision (defined as revision within 1 year postoperatively) and late revision (more than 1 year postoperatively) were also identified. The primary outcome of interest was patient-related risk factors for revision RSA. Secondary outcomes of interest were patient-related risk factors for early vs. late revision RSA and to compare surgical diagnoses for early vs. late revision RSA. Univariate analysis using chi-square tests was performed to analyze any differences in reasons for revision. Multivariate regression was subsequently utilized to control for any confounding variables when identifying risk factors for revision.ResultsA total of 28,880 patients were identified who underwent RSA, with 553 (1.9%) patients undergoing revision RSA. Three hundred eighty-five patients (69.6%) were classified as early revision (within one year), while 141 (30.4%) underwent late revision more than a year postoperatively. Risk factors for overall revisions included age <65 years (odds ratio [OR] = 1.23, P = .032), male sex (OR = 2.21, P < .001), type I diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.44, P = .039), congestive heart failure (CHF) (OR = 1.79, P < .001), and depression (OR = 1.33, P = .002) in addition to RSAs performed for fracture (OR = 1.63, P < .001) and glenohumeral instability (OR = 2.25, P < .001) compared to RSA performed for arthritis. Risk factors for early revision RSA included male sex (OR = 2.54, P < .001) and CHF (OR = 1.81, P < .001) in addition to RSAs performed for fracture (OR = 1.84, P < .001) and glenohumeral instability (OR = 2.44, P < .001). Risk factors for late revision RSA included male sex (OR = 1.62, P = .004), CHF (OR = 1.83, P = .005), steroid use (OR = 1.79, P = .036), human immunodeficiency virus (OR = 3.50, P = .038), and RSA performed for glenohumeral instability (OR = 1.92, P = .004). Early revision RSA was more commonly performed for instability (63.1% vs. 25.0%, P < .001) and stiffness (5.5% vs. 1.2%, P = .021) than late revisions.ConclusionRevision RSA is uncommon at early follow-up. Overall patient-related risk factors for revision include male sex, age <65 years, type I diabetes mellitus, CHF, and depression in addition to RSAs performed for fracture and glenohumeral instability. Instability and stiffness were more common indications for early compared to late revision. Instability remained the most common reason for overall revision followed by periprosthetic infection.     

Epidemiology,risk factors,and outcomes of infections in patients undergoing liver transplantation for hilar cholangiocarcinoma

The epidemiology of infection after liver transplantation for hilar cholangiocarcinoma has not been systematically investigated. In this study of 124 patients, 255 infections occurred in 105 patients during the median follow‐up of 4.2 years. The median time to first infection was 15.1 weeks (IQR 1.6‐62.6). The most common sites were the abdomen, bloodstream, and musculoskeletal system. Risk factors for any post‐transplant infection were pre‐transplant VRE colonization (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.9, P=.002), living donor transplantation (HR 6.6, P<.001), longer cold ischemia time (HR 1.05 per 10 minutes, P<.001), donor CMV seropositivity (HR 2.2, P<.001), hepatic artery thrombosis (HR 2.6, P=.005), biliary stricture (HR 3.8, P=.002), intra‐abdominal fluid collection (HR 4.2, P<.001), and re‐operations within 1 month after transplantation (HR 1.7, P=.020). Abdominal infections were independently associated with hemodialysis requirement within 1 month after transplantation (HR 5.6, P=.006), hepatic artery thrombosis (HR 3.3, P=.007), biliary stricture (HR 5.2, P<.001), and abdominal fluid collection (HR 3.7, P=.0002). Bloodstream infections were independently associated with allograft ischemia (HR 17.8, P<.001), biliary stricture (HR 6.5, P=.005), and recipient VRE colonization (HR 4, P<.001). Abdominal infections (HR 2.3, P=.02) and Clostridium difficile infections (HR 4.6, P=.01) were independently associated with increased mortality.     

Prognostic Factors Evaluation for Liver Transplant Mismatching: A New Way of Selecting and Allocating Organs

BackgroundLiver transplant (LT) is the standard therapy for end-stage liver disease. Advances in surgical techniques and immunosuppression protocols improved the results of LT by increasing long-term survival. Nevertheless, an adequate match between the donor and recipient is paramount for avoiding futile liver transplants. We aimed to identify the prognostic factors in donor-recipient LT matching.MethodsRetrospective analysis of adult LT was conducted from January 2006 to December 2018, which included the following transplant modalities: deceased donor LT (DDLT), living donor LT (LDLT), combined liver-kidney transplant (CLKT), and domino LT (DLT).ResultsAmong 1101 patients who underwent LT, 958 patients underwent DDLT, 92 patients underwent LDLT, 45 patients underwent CLKT, and 6 patients underwent DLT. The overall survival (OS) in 1, 5, and 10 years were 89%, 83%, and 82%, respectively. For DDLT, OS in 1, 5, and 10 years were 91%, 84%, and 82%, respectively. For LDLT, OS in 1, 5, and 10 years were 89%, 72%, and 69%, respectively. For CKLT, OS in 1, 5, and 10 years were 90%, 71%, and 71%, respectively. None of the DLT patients died. For DDLT, the factors that affected OS were the presence of fulminant liver failure (odds ratio [OR], 2.23; 95% CI, 1.18-4.18; P = .001), hemodialysis before LT (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.27-3.5; P = .004), retransplant (OR, 4.74; 95% CI, 2.75-8.17; P = .000), and recipient age >60 years (OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.27-2.73; P = .001). For hospitalization before LT (due to an acute-on-chronic liver failure), the OR was 2.10 (95% CI, 1.29-3.42; P = .003). Donor intensive care unit time >7 days (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.04-2.06; P = .02) was also associated with overall mortality.ConclusionsWe identified prognostic factors in donor-recipient LT matching. Furthermore, we demonstrated that an adequate organ allocation with donor-recipient selection might increase graft survival and reduce waiting list mortality.     

Postreperfusion Biopsy as a Predictor of Biliary Complication After Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation. A Retrospective Cohort Study

BackgroundIschemia reperfusion injury (IRI) on postreperfusion biopsies is associated with worse outcomes after liver transplantation, although the influence on biliary complications (BC) remains poorly studied. Therefore, the primary aim of our study was to assess the influence of IRI on the incidence of BC. A secondary aim was to assess the influence of steatosis on biliary complications and determine factors that predictor BC.MethodsWe report a retrospective cohort study including patients with liver transplantation and postreperfusion injury. Biopsies were classified as relevant and nonrelevant ischemia reperfusion injury for assessment of BC. BC included anastomotic stricture, ischemic cholangiopathy, leaks, and bilomas. Independent predictive factors of biliary complications were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses.Results302 patients were included, and 125 patients fulfilled the criteria for relevant IRI (41.4%). Worse IRI was not associated with biliary complications (42.5% vs 40.1%; P = .68), nor was liver graft steatosis associated with BC (40.5% vs 41.5%, P = .95). The median time until biliary complications did not differ between the 2 groups (2 months; interquartile range = 1-15 vs 3 months; interquartile range = 1-12.5; P = .18). Hepatic artery thrombosis (odds ratio [OR] = 3.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-8.2; P = .004), older donor age (OR = 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-4.1; P = .024), and prolonged cold ischemia time (OR = 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.2) were independent factors of biliary complications.ConclusionSevere IRI on the postreperfusion injury does not predict development of biliary complications.     

Multimodal Management for Refractory Biliary Stricture After Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BackgroundBiliary stricture is a common complication of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD) is the primary treatment of biliary stricture, which is sometimes refractory. This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors for biliary stricture after LDLT and present successful management for refractory biliary stricture.MethodsData from 26 patients who underwent LDLT were retrospectively analyzed. The relationship between the incidence of biliary strictures and clinical variables, including pre/intra/postoperative factors, was assessed.ResultsUnivariate analysis showed that ABO incompatibility (P = .037) was a significant risk factor for biliary strictures. Case 1 was a 57-year-old woman who underwent LDLT using a left-lobe graft for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and developed a biliary stricture 1 month after surgery. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage (PTCD) and embolization of the portal vein and hepatic artery were performed. Thereafter, ethanol was injected into the biliary duct, and the intervention was successfully completed. Case 2 was a 54-year-old woman who underwent LDLT using a right-lobe graft and duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction for PBC. Internal plastic stent insertion by ERBD was unsuccessful due to the significantly bending bile duct. After PTCD, the gun-site technique for the posterior branch and dual hepatic vascular embolization of the anterior branch was performed. The patient was followed up without an external fistula tube.ConclusionABO incompatibility was a risk factor for refractory biliary stricture. Appropriate procedures should be chosen based on stricture types.     

Biliary Complications After Orthotopic Liver Transplantation: The Hungarian Experience

Biliary complications (BC) significantly affect morbidity and mortality after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and types of biliary complications after OLT in Hungary. We retrospectively analyzed data of 471 adult liver transplant recipients between 1995 and 2011. Biliary complications occurred in 28% of patients. The most frequent BCs were bile duct stricture, stenosis (19%), biliary leakage (12%), and necrosis (BN: 6.4%). Biliary complications were associated with the incidence of acute rejection (51% vs 31%; P = .003), hepatic artery thrombosis (43% vs 11%; P < .001), and hepatic artery stenosis (26% vs 11%; P = .002). When cold ischemic time was longer than 12 hours, leakage (10% vs 3%; P = .043), ischemic type biliary lesion (20% vs 3.4%; P = .05), and BN (12% vs 3%; P = .067) were more often diagnosed post-OLT. Most of the biliary complications were treated by radiologic interventions (70%). Bile duct necrosis was associated with lower graft and patient survival. In conclusion, acute rejection, hepatic artery thrombosis/stenosis and cold ischemic time longer than 12 hours increase the incidence of BCs. Successful management of these risk factors can reduce the incidence of biliary complications and improve mortality.     

Prior surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures is associated with increased complications following subsequent reverse shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundThe objective of this study was to compare complication rates between patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) after a prior open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for proximal humerus fracture (PHF) to those undergoing RSA as a primary treatment for PHFs, glenohumeral osteoarthritis, or rotator cuff tear arthropathy (CTA).MethodsPatients who underwent RSA between 2015 and 2020 were identified in the Mariner database. Patients were separated into 3 mutually exclusive groups: (1) RSA for osteoarthritis, rotator cuff tear, or CTA (Control-RSA); (2) RSA as a primary treatment for PHF (PHF-RSA); and (3) RSA for patients with prior ORIF of PHFs (ORIF-RSA). Ninety-day medical and 2-year postoperative surgical complications were identified. In addition, patients in the PHF-RSA group were subdivided into those undergoing RSA for PHF within 3 months of the fracture (acute) vs. those treated greater than 3 months from diagnosis (delayed). Multivariate regression was performed to control for differences in comorbidities and demographics.ResultsA total of 30,824 patients underwent primary RSA for arthritis or CTA, 5389 patients underwent RSA as a primary treatment for a PHF, and 361 patients underwent RSA after ORIF of a PHF. ORIF before RSA was associated with an increased risk of overall revision (odds ratio [OR] 2.45, P = .002), infection (OR 2.40, P < .001), instability (OR 2.43, P < .001), fracture (OR 3.24, P = .001), minor medical complications (OR 1.59, P = .008), and readmission (OR 2.55, P = .001) compared with the Control-RSA cohort. RSA as a primary treatment for PHF was associated with an increased risk of 2-year revision (OR 1.60, P < .001), infection (OR 1.51, P < .001), instability (OR 2.84, P < .001), and fracture (OR 2.54, P < .001) in addition to major medical complications (OR 2.02, P < .001), minor medical complications (OR 1.92, P < .001), 90-day emergency department visits (OR 1.26, P < .001) and 90-day readmission (OR 2.03, P < .001) compared with the Control-RSA cohort. The ORIF-RSA group had an increased risk of periprosthetic infection (OR 1.94, P = .002) when compared with the PHF-RSA cohort. There were no differences in medical or surgical complications in the RSA-PHF cohort between patients treated in an acute or delayed fashion.ConclusionRSA following ORIF of a PHF is associated with increased complications compared with patients undergoing RSA for nonfracture indications. Prior ORIF of a PHF is also an independent risk factor for postoperative infection after RSA compared with patients who undergo RSA as a primary operation for fracture. The timing of RSA as a primary operation for PHF does not appear to impact the rates of postoperative medical and surgical complications.     

Mechanically Supported Early Graft Failure After Heart Transplantation

BackgroundThe occurrence of early graft failure (EGF) after heart transplantation (Htx) often requires a mechanical circulatory support (MCS) therapy. The aims of our study were to identify risk factors of mechanically supported severe EGF and evaluate their impact on both early and late outcomes.MethodsBetween January 2000 and December 2019, 499 consecutive adult patients underwent Htx at our institution. Severe EGF was defined as the need for extracorporeal life support (ECLS) within 24 hours after surgery. All available recipient and donor variables were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsOverall, EGF occurred in 58 (11.6%) patients. Post-Htx peripheral or central ECLS was necessary in 32 (6.4%) cases. Independent predictors of severe EGF were, in the recipient group, preoperative transpulmonary gradient (TPG) >12 mm Hg (odds ratio [OR] 4.1, P = .013), preoperative inotropic score >10 (OR 7.3, P = .0001), and pre-Htx ECLS support (OR 5.2, P = .015), while in the donors, a Eurotransplant donor score ≥17 (OR 8.5, P = .005). The absence of EGF was related with a better survival at 1 year and 5 years (94% and 85%, respectively) compared with EGF requiring ECLS population (36% and 28% at 1 year and 5 years, respectively; P < .001). A five-year conditional survival rate did not differ significantly (85% no EGF vs 83% EGF requiring ECLS).ConclusionBoth donor and recipient factors may influence EGF occurrence. Post-Htx ECLS may impact negatively early; however, patients weaned from ECLS eventually benefit from such a rescue treatment with outcomes comparable with Htx patients who did not suffer EGF.     

Impact of staff turnover during cardiac surgical procedures

ObjectiveThe impact of staff turnover during cardiac procedures is unknown. Accurate inventory of sharps (needles/blades) requires attention by surgical teams, and sharp count errors result in delays, can lead to retained foreign objects, and may signify communication breakdown. We hypothesized that increased team turnover raises the likelihood of sharp count errors and may negatively affect patient outcomes.MethodsAll cardiac operations performed at our institution from May 2011 to March 2016 were reviewed for sharp count errors from a prospectively maintained database. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed.ResultsAmong 7264 consecutive cardiac operations, sharp count errors occurred in 723 cases (10%). There were no retained sharps detected by x-ray in our series. Sharp count errors were lower on first start cases (7.7% vs 10.7%, P < .001). Cases with sharp count errors were longer than those without (7 vs 5.7 hours, P < .001). In multivariable analysis, factors associated with an increase in sharp count errors were non–first start cases (odds ratio [OR], 1.3; P = .006), weekend cases (OR, 1.6; P < .004), more than 2 scrub personnel (3 scrubs: OR, 1.3; P = .032; 4 scrubs: OR, 2; P < .001; 5 scrubs: OR, 2.4; P = .004), and more than 1 circulating nurse (2 nurses: OR, 1.9; P < .001; 3 nurses: OR, 2; P < .001; 4 nurses: OR, 2.4; P < .001; 5 nurses: OR, 3.1; P < .001). Sharp count errors were associated with higher rates of in-hospital mortality (OR, 1.9; P = .038).ConclusionsSharp count errors are more prevalent with increased team turnover and during non–first start cases or weekends. Sharp count errors may be a surrogate marker for other errors and thus increased mortality. Reducing intraoperative team turnover or optimizing hand-offs may reduce sharp count errors.     

Strategies to Reduce Infectious Complication Using Epidemiologic Data Analysis in Liver Transplant Recipients

Background

Infectious complications are major factors for morbidity and mortality in liver transplant recipients. To establish a proper strategy to reduce infectious complications, we analyzed epidemiologic and risk factors for post-transplant infections.

Methods

We analyzed the medical records of 231 consecutive liver transplant recipients from December 2007 to November 2011, including at least 1-year follow up, for comparison with those from 1996 to 2005.

Results

Among 231 patients, 126 (54.5%) experienced 244 infectious episodes, a rate of 1.05 per patient. Among overall mortality of 9.9% (23/231), infections were more prevalent (P = .04). Predominant infections were postoperative intra-abdominal problems (36.1%), peritonitis (15.2%), pneumonia (13.5%), bacteremia (4.1%), wound complications (1.6%), viral etiologies (18.0%), and other causes (11.5%). Causative organisms were bacterial (68.9%), viral (14.7%), fungal (7.0%), and unproven ones (9.4%). Multivariate analysis of risks for infection showed significant impacts of Model for End-stage Liver Disease score [P = .027; odds ratio (OR), 1.04], post-transplant biliary complications (P < .001; OR, 3.50), and rejection episodes (P = .023; OR, 3.39). Mortality was related to retransplantation (P = .003), post-transplant dialysis (P = .006), and infection (P = .056) upon univariate analysis, none of which were significant in multivariate analysis. Compared with data from the previous period, overall and infection-related mortality decreased from 24.5% to 9.9% and 52.9% to 26.1%, respectively. There were no significant changes in the types of infection or rate of drug-resistant bacteria, but candidal infections and cytomegalovirus reactivations were more prevalent.

Conclusion

Our data showed current perioperative antimicrobial regimens need not be changed: however, new strategies are needed to reduce infectious complications after liver transplantation, to reduce biliary complications and to properly manage rejection episodes.     

Hepatic artery reconstruction and biliary stricture formation after living donor adult liver transplantation using the left lobe

Biliary complications, including bile leak, biliary stricture, and cholangitis, are seen in 15% to 29% of all cases after living related liver transplantation. We investigate risk factors and discuss the management of biliary complications after living related liver transplantation in adults using left-lobe grafts. We studied 37 adult patients who underwent living related liver transplantation using left-lobe grafts. Perioperative variables were evaluated as risk factors for biliary strictures. The overall incidence of biliary complications was 43.2% (16 of 37 patients). Anastomotic strictures occurred in 8 patients, whereas bile leaks and cholangitis occurred in 9 and 8 patients, respectively. Anastomotic stricture was strongly related to a partial artery reconstruction (P < .02) and cholangitis (P < .01). Anastomotic biliary stricture was not associated with bile leak, acute cellular rejection, or infection. Our results suggest that an important risk factor for biliary anastomotic biliary strictures is a partial artery reconstruction. To minimize the risk for biliary anastomotic strictures, we will reconstruct both the middle and left hepatic artery. (Liver Transpl 2002;8:495-495.)     

Histopathological Evaluation of Gallbladder Specimens Obtained From Living Liver Donors

BackgroundCholecystectomy is routinely performed during living donor hepatectomy both to see the structure of the biliary tract and to determine the demarcation line based on the biliary tract junction. This study aims to present the general histopathological features of the gallbladder specimen obtained from living liver donors (LLD).MethodsData from 2577 LLDs who underwent living donor hepatectomy (n = 2511) or aborted living donor hepatectomy (n = 66) in our Liver Transplantation Institute between September 2005 and June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Age, gender, macroscopic (length, diameter, and wall thickness), and microscopic (histopathological) features of the gallbladder of the LLDs were recorded for use in this study.ResultsA total of 2493 LLDs (men: 1486, women: 1007) with a median age of 29 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 13) met the inclusion criteria in this study. The median length, width and wall thickness of the gallbladder specimens were measured as 70 mm (IQR: 20), 50 mm (IQR: 20), and 2 mm (IQR: 1), respectively. The most common histopathological findings are normal structure (2026; 81.3%), chronic cholecystitis (n = 446; 17.9%), adenomyomatosis (n = 9), and papillary hyperplasia (n = 6), respectively. The most common pathologic findings in the gallbladder lumen are cholesterolosis (n = 207; 0.4%), cholelithiasis (n = 53), cholesterol polyp (n = 31), and noncholesterol polyp (n = 19), respectively. Significant differences were detected between the male and female genders in terms of age (P < .001), height (P < .001), weight (P < .001), body mass index (P < .001), gallbladder width (P = .001), gallbladder length (P < .001), histopathological finding (content) (P < .001), and lymph node around the gallbladder (P = .015).ConclusionsThe results we obtained in this study are true gallbladder pathologies that can be detected in healthy people. In this study, it was shown that the diameter and size of the gallbladder were larger in men, whereas the incidence of cholesterolosis and cholelithiasis was higher in women.     

Outcomes of lung transplantation from donors with a history of substance abuse

ObjectiveThe study objective was to determine whether donor substance abuse (opioid overdose death, opioid use, cigarette or marijuana smoking) impacts lung acceptance and recipient outcomes.MethodsDonor offers to a single center from 2013 to 2019 were reviewed to determine if lung acceptance rates and recipient outcomes were affected by donor substance abuse.ResultsThere were 3515 donor offers over the study period. A total of 154 offers (4.4%) were opioid use and 117 (3.3%) were opioid overdose deaths. A total of 1744 donors (65.0%) smoked cigarettes and 69 donors (2.6%) smoked marijuana. Of smokers, 601 (35.0%) had less than 20 pack-year history and 1117 (65.0%) had more than 20 pack-year history. Substance abuse donors were younger (51.5 vs 55.2 P < .001), more often male (65.6 vs 54.8%, P < .001), more often White (86.2 vs 68.7%, P < .001), and had hepatitis C (8.3 vs 0.8%, P < .001). Donor acceptance was significantly associated with brain dead donors (odds ratio, 1.56, P < .001), donor smoking history (odds ratio, 0.56, P < .001), hepatitis C (odds ratio, 0.35, P < .001), younger age (odds ratio, 0.98, P < .001), male gender (odds ratio, 0.74, P = .004), and any substance abuse history (odds ratio, 0.50, P < .001), but not opioid use, opioid overdose death, or marijuana use. Recipient survival was equivalent when using lungs from donors who had opioid overdose death, who smoked marijuana, or who smoked cigarettes for less than 20 patient-years or more than 20 patient-years, and significantly longer in recipients of opioid use lungs. There was no significant difference in time to chronic lung allograft dysfunction for recipients who received lungs from opioid overdose death or with a history of opioid use, marijuana smoking, or cigarette smoking.ConclusionsDonor acceptance was impacted by cigarette smoking but not opioid use, opioid overdose death, or marijuana use. Graft outcomes and recipient survival were similar for recipients of lungs from donors who abused substances.     

Failure of abdominal wall closure after intestinal transplantation: Identifying high‐risk recipients

Open abdomen and fascial dehiscence after intestinal transplantation increase morbidity. This study aims to identify recipient and donor factors associated with failure to achieve sustained primary closure (failed‐SPC) of the abdomen after intestinal transplant. We conducted a single‐center retrospective study of 96 intestinal transplants between 2013 and 2018. Thirty‐eight (40%) were adult patients, and 58 were pediatric patients. Median age at transplantation was 36.0 and 5.8 years, respectively. Failed‐SPC occurred in 31 (32%) patients. Identified risk factors of failed‐SPC included preexisting enterocutaneous fistula (OR: 6.8, CI: 2.4‐19.6, P = .0003), isolated intestinal graft (OR: 3.4, CI: 1.24‐9.47, P = .02), male sex in adults (OR: 3.93, CI: 1.43‐10.8, P = .009), and age over four years (OR: 6.22, CI: 1.7‐22.7, P = .004). There was no association with primary diagnosis and prior transplant with failed‐SPC. Donor‐to‐recipient size ratios did not predict failed‐SPC. There was an association between failed‐SPC and extended median hospital stay (100 vs 57 days, P = .007) and increased time to enteral autonomy in pediatric patients. There is a relationship between failed‐SPC and a higher rate of laparotomy (OR: 21.4, CI: 2.78‐178.2, P = .0003) and fistula formation posttransplant (OR: 11.4, CI: 2.83‐45.84, P = .0005) in pediatric patients. Given inferior outcomes with failed‐SPC, high‐risk recipients require careful evaluation.     

Cytomegalovirus mismatch still negatively affects patient and graft survival in the era of routine prophylactic and preemptive therapy: A paired kidney analysis

The impact of cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus on kidney transplant outcomes in an era when CMV prophylactic and preemptive strategies are used routinely is not clearly established. Using United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data, recipients with first deceased donor kidney transplant (≥18 years, 2010‐2015) were stratified into 4 groups in the main cohort: CMV‐seronegative donor (D?)/CMV‐seronegative recipient (R?), CMV‐seropositive donor (D+)/R?, D+/CMV‐seropositive recipient (R+), and D?/R+. In a paired kidney cohort, we identified 2899 pairs of D? kidney transplant with discordance of recipient serostatus (D?/R? vs D?/R+) and 4567 pairs of D+ kidney transplant with discordance of recipient serostatus (D+/R? vs D+/R+). In the main cohort, D+/R? was associated with a higher risk of graft failure (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.17, P = .01), all‐cause mortality (HR = 1.18, P < .001), and infection‐related mortality (HR = 1.38, P = .03) compared with D?/R?. In the paired kidney analysis, D+/R? was an independent risk factor for all‐cause mortality (HR = 1.21, P = .003) and infection‐related mortality (HR = 1.47, P = .04) compared with D+/R+. No difference in graft loss between D+/R? and D+/R+. CMV mismatch is still an independent risk factor for graft loss and patient mortality. The negative impact of D+/R? serostatus on mortality persists after fully matching for donor factors.