Effect of equivalent doses of fentanyl, sufentanil, and remifentanil on the incidence and severity of cough in patients undergoing abdominal surgery: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study

Background: Fentanyl congeners have been found to induce cough during induction of general anesthesia. Studies of fentanyl and sufentanil have found incidence rates of 28% to 65% and 15%, respectively. However, no study has assessed the occurrence of cough induced by remifentanil.Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of equivalent doses of fentanyl, sufentanil, and remifentanil on cough.Methods: Patients rated American Society of Anesthesiologists class I or II of either sex, aged 18 to 60 years, who were scheduled for elective abdominal surgery with general anesthesia were randomly and equally assigned to 3 groups using a computer-generated table of random numbers. The patients received equivalent doses of fentanyl 2 μg/kg, sufentanil 0.2 μg/kg, or remifentanil 2 μg/kg via IV push. Vital signs (systolic blood pressure [SBP], heart rate [HR], and oxygen saturation via pulse oximetry [SpO₂]) and the occurrence and severity of cough were recorded for 2 minutes after drug administration by an anesthesiologist who was blinded to the drug treatment. The severity of cough was graded as none (0), mild (1–2), moderate (3–5), or severe (>5).Results: A total of 315 Chinese patients (197 women, 118 men; mean [SD] age, 37.9 [10.4] years) were approached for enrollment and assigned to 3 groups of 105 patients each; all patients completed the study protocol. The 3 treatment groups were similar in terms of demographic characteristics and type of abdominal surgery. The incidence of cough was significantly greater in the remifentanil group (57 [54.3%] patients) than in the fentanyl group (35 [33.3%]; P < 0.01) or the sufentanil group (32 [30.5%]; P < 0.01). The severity of cough was significantly greater in the remifentanil group (severe, moderate, mild, none: 24, 7, 26, 48) than in the fentanyl (7, 9, 19, 70; P < 0.01) or sufentanil group (4, 2, 26, 73; P < 0.01). In all 3 groups, when the patients coughed, significant increases were observed in their SBP (128 [12]–139 [16] mm Hg; P < 0.01) and HR (74 [10]–87 [16] beats/min; P < 0.01). Within 2 minutes after drug administration, 62 patients (59%) in the remifentanil group experienced hypoxemia (SpO₂ <90%) necessitating manually assisted mask ventilation, while no patients experienced hypoxemia in the fentanyl or sufentanil group. Three patients (2.9%) in the remifentanil group experienced muscle rigidity and deterioration of SBP, HR, and SpO₂. No other adverse events were recorded.Cunclusion: Remifentanil was associated with a significantly greater incidence and severity of cough than equivalent doses of fentanyl or sufentanil. Fentanyl and sufentanil appeared comparable in these Chinese patients undergoing abdominal surgery.     

纳布啡联合酮咯酸氨丁三醇预处理对电视胸腔镜外科手术后急性痛觉过敏的影响

目的 观察纳布啡联合酮咯酸氨丁三醇预处理对电视胸腔镜外科手术（VATS）后急性痛觉过敏的影响。方法 选取2020年9月-2021年9月该院择期全身麻醉下行VATS肺叶切除术的Ⅰ期和Ⅱ期非小细胞肺癌患者72例,随机分为对照组（C组）、纳布啡组（N组）和纳布啡联合酮咯酸氨丁三醇组（L组）,每组24例。麻醉诱导前,L组静脉注射纳布啡+酮咯酸氨丁三醇,N组静脉注射纳布啡,C组注射等量生理盐水。于术前、术后6 h、术后24 h和术后48 h时使用电子测痛仪（Von Frey）测定前臂内侧及切口周围机械痛阈值,于术后30 min、术后6 h、术后24 h和术后48 h采用数字分级评分法（NRS）评估疼痛情况,比较3组患者术后48 h内舒芬太尼累积消耗量及不良反应发生情况。结果 3组患者术后6、24和48 h前臂内侧及切口周围机械痛阈值比较,差异有统计学意义（P <0.05）。3组患者术后30 min、6 h和24 h的NRS及术后48 h内舒芬太尼累积消耗量比较,差异有统计学意义（P <0.05）。N组和L组术后6、24和48 h的前臂内侧机械痛阈值及切口周围机械痛阈值均高于C组,术后...     

Low fresh gas flow balanced anesthesia versus target controlled intravenous infusion anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a cost-minimization analysis

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery is widely recognized as a well-tolerated and effective method for cholecystectomy. It is also considered cost saving because it has been associated with a decreased hospital length of stay. Variables that might lead to increased costs in laparoscopic surgery are the technique and drugs used in anesthesia. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to compare the costs of 2 anesthetic techniques used in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)--balanced versus IV anesthesia--from the standpoint of an outpatient surgical department, with a time horizon of 1 year. METHODS: Patients scheduled to undergo elective LC were enrolled in this prospective case study. Patients were randomly allocated to receive balanced anesthesia, administered as low fresh gas flow (LFGF) with inhalational sevoflurane and IV sufentanil in a target controlled infusion (LFGF SS group), or IV anesthesia, administered as IV propofol/sufentanil in a target controlled infusion (TCI group). We used a microcosting procedure to measure health care resource utilization in individual patients to detect treatment differences. The costs of medications used for the induction and maintenance of anesthesia during surgery were considered for LFGF SS and TCI. Other end points included duration of anesthesia; mean times to early emergence, tracheal extubation, orientation, and postanesthesia discharge (PAD); pain intensity before first analgesia; number of analgesics required in the first 24 hours after surgery; and prevalences of nausea, vomiting, and agitation. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients were included in this analysis (male/female ratios in the LFGF SS and TCI groups: 11/19 and 12/18, respectively; mean [SD] ages, 48 [7.9] and 47 [8.6] years; and mean [SD] body mass indexes, 26 [2.0] and 26 [3.0] kg/m2). The costs of anesthetics were significantly lower with LFGF SS compared with TCI (euro17.40 [euro2.66] vs euro22.01 [euro2.50] [2006 euros]). Times to early emergence and tracheal extubation were significantly shorter with LFGF SS than TCI (5.97 [1.16] vs 7.73 [1.48] minutes and 7.57 [1.07] vs 8.87 [1.45] minutes, respectively). There were no significant between-group differences in mean duration of anesthesia; times to orientation and PAD; pain intensity before first analgesia; number of analgesics required in the first 24 hours; or prevalences of nausea, vomiting, and agitation. Because no clinically significant differences in the anesthetic results were observed, a cost-minimization analysis was conducted and found that using LFGF SS, the outpatient surgical department could realize a budget savings of euro454 per 100 patients. For the nearly 1000 expected patients per year, the savings for the department was calculated as euro4540. CONCLUSION: The results from this cost analysis in these patients who underwent elective LC suggest that the use of sevoflurane through the LFGF technique would be cost saving in this outpatient surgical department.     

Effects of preemptive intravenous lornoxicam on the analgesic efficacy of epidural morphine and expression of chemokines in women undergoing hysterectomy

Background: It is believed that preemptive IV lornoxicam treatment can reduce the consumption of other analgesics, improve analgesic efficacy, and ameliorate immune function during patient-controlled IV analgesia. However, the effects of preemptive IV lornoxicam treatment on the analgesic efficacy of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with morphine and on chemokine expression remain unknown.Objective: The aim of this prospective, randomized, controlled study was to observe the effects of preemptive IV lornoxicam treatment on the analgesic efficacy of PCEA with morphine and on the expression of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) and stromal cell-derived factor-1α (SDF-1α) in women undergoing hysterectomy.Methods: Patients undergoing elective hysterectomy with combined spinal and epidural anesthesia were randomized to 1 of 3 groups to receive IV lornoxicam 8 mg before anesthesia (group 1), lornoxicam 16-mg injection before anesthesia (group 2), or isotonic saline (control) before anesthesia. PCEA was used to treat postoperative pain, and a visual analog scale (VAS) and the Bruggemann Comfort Scale (BCS) were used to evaluate analgesic efficacy. Morphine consumption was recorded. To measure plasma concentrations of MCP-1 and SDF-1α via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, venous blood samples were obtained from patients at 4 separate times: before anesthesia (baseline); 0 (immediately after anesthesia administration); and 24 and 48 hours after surgery.Results: Forty-five patients (mean [SD] age, 41 [5] years; mean [SD] weight, 54 [6] kg) undergoing elective hysterectomy were included in the study. There were no significant differences in VAS scores, BCS scores, or morphine consumption between the 3 groups. Compared with baseline values, MCP-1 and SDF-1α concentrations were increased significantly immediately after surgery in all 3 groups (all, P < 0.01) and returned to near-baseline values at 24 hours postsurgery in groups 1 and 2, and by 48 hours postsurgery in the control group. MCP-1 and SDF-1α concentrations in groups 1 and 2 were significantly lower than those in the control group immediately (all, P < 0.01) and 24 hours postsurgery (all, P < 0.05).Conclusion: Preemptive IV lornoxicam treatment was associated with attenuation of the plasma concentrations of MCP-1 and SDF-1α immediately after and 24 hours after hysterectomy and was associated with more rapid resolution to near-baseline concentrations of both cytokines in these patients compared with controls; however, it was not associated with significantly reducing epidural morphine consumption.     

Effects of Ondansetron and Granisetron on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Adult Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are common and potentially distressing adverse events (AEs) associated with surgery and anesthesia. In patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) without antiemetic prophylaxis, the incidence of PONV can be as high as 72%.Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the prophylactic antiemetic effects of ondansetron and granisetron in patients undergoing LC when these agents are administered before the end of surgery.Methods: Patients classified by the American Society of Anesthesiologist's physical status as I or II who were scheduled for elective LC were included in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesia was induced with thiopental 5 mg/kg and fentanyl 2 μg/kg, and was maintained with isoflurane 1% to 3% in 50% oxygen and 50% nitrous oxide and fentanyl as needed. Approximately 20 to 30 minutes before the end of the surgery, the patients randomly received either IV ondansetron 100 μg/kg (group O), IV granisetron 40 μg/kg (group G), or normal saline (group P). Plasma levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were determined preoperatively and 24 hours postoperatively. The patients were observed for 24 hours for PONV and other possible AEs. Postoperative pain intensity was determined using a 10-cm visual analogue scale. Four-point satisfaction scores were determined at 24 hours.Results: Ninety patients (69 women, 21 men) participated in the study. Demographic characteristics and operative data (duration of surgery and anesthesia and amount of intraoperative fentanyl) were similar in the 3 groups. The only AE reported by patients during the 24-hour observation period was nonsevere headache. The number of patients experiencing headache was similar in group P, group O, and group G (10 [33%] patients, 6 [20%], and 10 [33%], respectively). No significant changes were found in presurgical and postsurgical plasma levels of ALT and AST in any group. The mean (SD) satisfaction scores in group O and group G (3.0 [0.4] and 3.0 [0.6], respectively) were significantly higher than those in group P (2.5 [0.5]; both, P < 0.01). Immediately after surgery (period 0), significantly more patients in the placebo group (21 [70%]) experienced PONV compared with those in the ondansetron group (9 [30%]; P < 0.05) and the granisetron group (7 [23%]; P < 0.01). During the 24-hour observation period, a significantly greater number of patients in group P (18 [60%]) required a single dose of a rescue antiemetic drug compared with those in groups O and G (9 [30%] and 6 [20%], respectively; both, P < 0.01).Conclusions: Patients administered ondansetron 100 μg/kg or granisetron 40 μg/kg 20 to 30 minutes before the end of LC had significantly higher PONV control during the 24-hour postoperative observation period than patients receiving placebo. However, there were no significant differences between the active treatment groups in the incidence of PONV, patient satisfaction, or AEs.     

Dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to epidural analgesia after abdominal surgery in elderly intensive care patients: A prospective, double-blind, clinical trial

Background: The ideal postoperative analgesia management of elderly surgical patients in intensive care units (ICUs) is continually being investigated.Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of IV administration of dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to a low-dose epidural bupivacaine infusion for postoperative analgesia after abdominal surgery in elderly patients in the ICU.Methods: ICU patients aged >70 years undergoing abdominal surgery were eligible for the study. A lumbar epidural catheter was inserted at the beginning of the surgery with no medication. On arrival at the ICU, the catheter was loaded with 0.25% bupivacaine 25 mg at the T8 to T10 sensory level, and a continuous infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine was started at 4 to 6 mL/h in combination with patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) of fentanyl (4 μg/bolus) for pain treatment. Patients in the treatment group received dexmedetomidine as an IV loading dose of 0.6 pg/kg for 30 minutes followed by continuous infusion at 0.2 μg/kg · h^-1. Patients in the control group were not administered dexmedetomidine. The effectiveness of the pain relief was determined using a visual analog scale (VAS) (0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain imaginable) at rest. VAS score, heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure, and arterial blood gases were monitored periodically for 24 hours after surgery. If required, tenoxicam (20-mg IV bolus) was used to ensure a VAS score of ≤3. The number of times PCEA and tenoxicam were administered and the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) were also recorded.Results: Sixty patients (34 men, 26 women; mean [SD] age, 75.96 [4.25] years; mean [SD] weight, 74.13 [10.62] kg) were included in the study. VAS scores were significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group compared with the control group at hours 1, 2, and 12 (VAS [hour 1]: 2.8 [0.4], P < 0.001; VAS [hour 2]: 2.7 [0.5], P < 0.001; and VAS [hour 12]: 0.9 [0.7], P 0.044). The mean number of administrations of fentanyl via PCEA was significantly greater in the control group compared with the dexmedetomidine group (2.20 vs 6.63 times; P < 0.001). The mean number of administrations of tenoxicam was significantly lower in the treatment group than the control group (0.27 vs 1.07 times; P < 0.001). In the control group, the decreases in sedation at 0, 8, 12, 16, and 20 hours were significant compared with baseline (P = 0.024, P = 0.001, P = 0.020, P < 0.001, and P = 0.005, respectively). Mean HR, SBR and AEs (eg, bradycardia [HR <60 beats/min], respiratory depression [respiratory rate <8 breaths/min], hypotension \SBP <90 mm Hg], oversedation, hypoxia, and hypercapnia) decreased significantly in the dexmedetomidine group (all, P < 0.05). Significantly more patients in the dexmedetomidine group rated their satisfaction with postoperative pain control as excellent compared with the control group (12 vs 6 patients; P = 0.014).Conclusion: Intravenous dexmedetomidine was effective and generally well tolerated as an analgesic adjunct to epidural low-dose bupivacaine infusion for pain treatment, with lower need for opioids after abdominal surgery in these elderly intensive care patients than in the control group.     

Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of sulfamethoxazole in male chinese volunteers at low altitude and acute exposure to high altitude versus subjects living chronically at high altitude: An open-label,controlled, prospective study

Background: Sulfamethoxazole is an antibacterial sulfonamide used primarily for the treatment of a wide variety of bacterial infections in combination with trimethoprim. Despite being used as prophylactic treatment for respiratory infections associated with high altitude, little information is available on the pharmacokinetic properties of sulfamethoxazole in subjects living at high altitude, especially in a Chinese population.Objective: This study was conducted to investigate the pharmacokinetics of sulfamethoxazole in healthy Chinese subjects after acute and chronic exposure to high altitude.Methods: An open-label, controlled, prospective study was conducted in healthy Chinese male volunteers. Sulfamethoxazole 1200 mg was administered orally to volunteers in 3 groups: those residing at low altitude (~400 m [~1300 ft]); these same volunteers after 16 hours (acute) of exposure to high altitude (~3780 m [~12,400 ft]); and a separate group of volunteers who had been living at high altitude (~3780 m) for ≥1 year (chronic). The phases of the low-altitude and acute-exposure groups were separated by a 1-week washout period. Blood samples were collected from an indwelling venous catheter into heparinized tubes before (baseline) study drug administration and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours after study drug administration. Sulfamethoxazole in whole blood, plasma, and plasma water, and its metabolite, N⁴-acetyl-sulfamethoxazole, in plasma were determined by HPLC. Tolerability was determined using blood chemistry testing, continuous 12-lead ECG, and blood pressure monitoring.Results: A total of 23 healthy Chinese male volunteers living at low altitude (race, all Han Chinese; mean [SD] age, 20.4 [1.1] years [range, 19–24 years]; weight, 64.2 [5.9] kg [range, 56.0–75.0 kg]; and height, 172.1 [4.9] cm [range, 163.0–180.0 cm]) and 21 healthy Chinese male volunteers living at high altitude (race, all Han Chinese; mean [SD] age, 21.2 [1.3] years [range, 19–24 years]; weight, 62.4 [8.2] kg [range, 50.0–75.0 kg]; and height, 171.4 [5.8] cm [range, 162.0–182.0 cm]) were enrolled in the study; 20 from each group completed the study. Concentration of sulfamethoxazole in plasma water decreased significantly after exposure to high altitude; therefore, the protein binding was significantly higher in the acute- (80.4%) and chronic-exposure (72.5%) groups compared with the low-altitude group (65.7%; both, P < 0.001). The binding of sulfamethoxazole to red blood cells was 6.0%, 6.9%, and 9.3% in the low-altitude, acute-, and chronic-exposure groups, respectively. The chronic-exposure group was 55% higher than the low-altitude group (P < 0.001). The following values were recorded in the low-altitude, acute-, and chronic-exposure groups after administration of sulfamethoxazole, respectively: mean (SD) t_½, 9.30 (1.11), 10.37 (0.88), and 11.15 (1.53) hours; mean residence time (MRT_0–48), 12.06 (0.94), 13.15 (0.67), and 13.00 (1.01) hours; elimination rate constant (k_e), 0.076 (0.010), 0.067 (0.006), and 0.063 (0.009) hours^?1; AUC_0–48, 1202.5 (238.3), 1416.3 (202.6), and 1298.5 (256.0) μ/mL/h; and clearance (CL), 1.01 (0.22), 0.83 (0.13), and 0.92 (0.22) L/kg/h. The t_½ was 11.5% and 19.9% higher in the acute- and chronic-exposure groups, respectively, compared with the low-altitude group, and 7.5% higher in the chronic-exposure group than in the acute-exposure group. MRT was 9.0% and 7.8% higher in the acute- (P < 0.05) and chronic-exposure (P < 0.001) groups, respectively, than in the low-altitude group. AUC_0–48 was 17.8% higher and CL was 17.8% lower in the acute-exposure group compared with the low-altitude group (both, P < 0.05).Conclusion: This study found significant changes in the disposition of sulfamethoxazole in these healthy male Chinese subjects after either acute or chronic exposure to an altitude of ~3780 m in comparison to those residing at an altitude of ~400 m.     

Comparison of the effects of parecoxib and diclofenac in preemptive analgesia: A prospective, randomized, assessor-blind, single-dose, parallel-group study in patients undergoing elective general surgery

Background:

Preoperative administration of analgesics may prevent or reducehyperalgesia, inhibit inflammation, and reduce pain by reducing the synthesis of prostaglandins in response to tissue damage caused by surgery. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a potent, widely used class of analgesic agents; however, they may not be as effective as selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerabilityof the COX-2 inhibitor parecoxib sodium and the NSAID diclofenac sodium as preemptive analgesics in patients undergoing elective general surgery.

Methods:

This was a prospective, randomized, assessor-blind, single-dose,parallel-group, comparative trial. Patients aged 18 to 65 years undergoing elective general surgery were enrolled. A single IM injection of parecoxib 40 mg or diclofenac 75 mg was administered 30 to 45 minutes before the induction of anesthesia. Surgery was performed as per standard protocol. The primary measures of efficacy were pain intensity score (measured on a visual analog scale [VAS]), pain relief score, duration of analgesia, and platelet aggregation response to adenosine diphosphate. Tolerability assessment included monitoring of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), physical examination, laboratory analysis, electrocardiography, and chest radiography.

Results:

Eighty patients (56 men, 24 women; mean [SD] age, 45.96 [12.83] years) were enrolled in the study (40 patients per treatment group). All patients completed the trial. No pain was reported by any patient in the parecoxib group up to 12 hours; in the diclofenac group, no pain was reported up to 6 hours. At 12 hours, the mean (SD) VAS score was 2.33 (1.39) (moderate pain) in the diclofenac group and 0 (no pain) in the parecoxib group (P < 0.05). At 12 hours, total pain relief was reported by all 40 patients (100.0%) in the parecoxib group but by none (0.0%) in the diclofenac group, and 2 patients in the diclofenac group (5.0%) reported good pain relief (between-group difference for total + good pain relief, P < 0.05). Mean (SD) duration of analgesia was significantly longer in the parecoxib group than in the diclofenac group (19.48 [5.61] hours vs 8.32 [4.11 ] hours; P < 0.05). Platelet aggregation was significantly inhibited in the diclofenac group (change from baseline, 64.0%) but not in the parecoxib group (change from baseline, 12.0%) (P < 0.05). Both regimens were well tolerated, and no AEs were reported.

Conclusions:

In this study of patients undergoing elective general surgery,patients treated with the COX-2 specific inhibitor parecoxib experienced no pain at 12 hours, and the treatment was well tolerated. The results of this study suggest that good postoperative analgesia and minimal interference with platelet function may make parecoxib an alternative to the nonselective NSAID diclofenac in providing preemptive analgesia in patients undergoing general surgery.     

Analgesic Effects and Adverse Reactions of Lidocaine for Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia on Patients Undergoing Open Hepatectomy: A Retrospective Analysis

PurposeThe aim of this study was to investigate the effect of lidocaine for patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) in patients who underwent open hepatectomy.DesignA retrospective analysis.MethodsA total of 281 patients who underwent open hepatectomy from July 2018 to December 2018 were included. All patients were assigned into two groups: the lidocaine group (PCIA consisted of lidocaine, sufentanil, tramadol and granisetron) and the control group (PCIA consisted of sufentanil, tramadol and granisetron). The postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) and complications (including respiratory depression, hypotension, nausea and vomiting, pruritus, numbness of the corners of the mouth, dizziness) between the groups were compared.FindingsThere were no significant differences between the characteristics, duration of surgery and anesthesia, and recovery of postoperative activity between the two groups. In the first 3 days after the operation, the postoperative VAS score of the lidocaine group was lower than that of the control group at resting state, while after activity, the postoperative VAS contrast results were completely opposite. In particularly, the resting state at 48 hours (h) (1.05 ± 1.25 vs 1.57 ± 1.54) after surgery and the activity state at 72 h (3.02 ± 1.51 vs 2.2 ± 1.66) after surgery (P < 0.05). The incidence of mouth numbness and dizziness were significantly increased in the lidocaine group (P < 0.05).ConclusionThe addition of lidocaine in PCIA was not beneficial to improve the pain during activities and increased the incidence of perioral numbness and dizziness.     

Prolonged sevoflurane administration in the off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Beneficial effects

Purpose

The benefits of intraoperative administration of halogenated agents in patients undergoing cardiac surgery have been shown by numerous studies. The mechanisms of preconditioning and postconditioning appear to be the cause of these benefits. The possibility of maintaining the early postoperative sedation with halogenated agents, after its intraoperative administration, can increase their benefits.

Patients and methods

This is a prospective trial with 60 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery divided into 3 groups according to the administration of hypnotic drugs in the intraoperative and postoperative periods (sevoflurane, sevoflurane: SS, sevoflurane-propofol: SP, propofol-propofol: PP). For the first 48 hours, hemodynamic parameters, the need for inotropic drugs, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, and troponin I plasmatic concentrations were obtained.

Results

There were significant differences between group SS and the other 2 groups in the levels of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (SS [501 ± 280 pg/mL] compared with SP [1270 ± 498 pg/mL] and PP [1775 ± 527 pg/mL] [P < .05]) and troponin I (SS [0.5 ± 0.4 ng/mL] compared with SP [1.61 ± 1.30 ng/mL] and PP [2.27 ± 1.5 ng/mL] [P < .05]) and a lower number of inotropic drugs.

Conclusion

Sevoflurane administration in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass graft, in the operating room and the intensive care unit, decreases myocardial injury markers compared with patients who only received sevoflurane in the intraoperative period, but both were a better option to decrease levels of myocardial markers when compared with the propofol group.     

利多卡因联合舒芬太尼用于老年患者腰椎减压内固定术后静脉自控镇痛的效果

目的：观察利多卡因联合舒芬太尼用于老年患者腰椎减压内固定术后静脉自控镇痛（PCIA）的效果。方法选择择期行腰椎减压内固定术的老年患者60例,美国麻醉医师协会分级Ⅰ～Ⅱ级,均采用静脉诱导静吸复合全身麻醉,随机数字表法分为两组（n=30）：利多卡因＋舒芬太尼（L＋SF）组和舒芬太尼（SF）组。 L＋SF组于术后给利多卡因针50 mg/kg和舒芬太尼针150μg,SF组于术后给舒芬太尼针150μg,两组均用0.9％氯化钠注射液稀释到300 ml, PCIA以LCP模式（负荷量4.0 ml＋持续量4.0 ml/h＋单次病人自控镇痛（PCA）量4.0 ml/次）给药,PCA均间隔20 min,术后48 h停用镇痛泵。结果两组在各时点的视觉模拟评分（VAS）相当,差异均无统计学意义（t分别=0.23、0.46、0.22、0.33、0.26、0.41、0.22、0.17、0.07、0.61、1.11、1.10,P均＞0.05）;L＋SF组术后24 h、48 h 的PCIA按压次数和有效按压次数明显低于SF组,差异均有统计学意义（t分别=2.78、3.00、3.78、4.63,P均＜0.05）;L＋SF组术后24 h、48 h内舒芬太尼的用量明显低于SF组,差异均有统计学意义（t分别=5.51、6.75,P均＜0.05）;术后L＋SF组的呼吸抑制发生率和过度镇静发生率明显低于SF组,差异均有统计学意义（χ2分别=5.46、4.32,P均＜0.05）;两组恶心、呕吐的发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义（χ2分别=1.93、2.03, P均＞0.05）。结论利多卡因联合舒芬太尼可以安全用于老年患者腰椎减压内固定术后静脉自控镇痛,镇痛效果较好,不良反应发生率低。     

Comparison of recovery characteristics, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and gastrointestinal motility with total intravenous anesthesia with propofol versus inhalation anesthesia with desflurane for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled study

Background:Clinical effects, recovery characteristics, and costs of total intravenous anesthesia with different inhalational anesthetics have been investigated and compared; however, there are no reported clinical studies focusing on the effects of anesthesia with propofol and desflurane in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and alfentanil compared with those of desflurane and alfentanil on recovery characteristics, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), duration of hospitalization, and gastrointestinal motility.Methods: Patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to benign gallbladder disease were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive total intravenous anesthesia with propofol (2-2.5 mg/kg) and alfentanil (20 μg/kg) or desflurane (4%-6%) and alfentanil (20 μg/kg). Perioperative management during premedication, intraoperative analgesia, relaxation, ventilation, and postoperative analgesia were carried out identically in the 2 groups. Extubation time, recovery time, PONV, postoperative antiemetic requirement, time to gastrointestinal motility and flatus, duration of hospitalization, and adverse effects were recorded. Postoperative pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale.Results: Sixty-eight patients were assessed for inclusion in the study; 5 were excluded because they chose open surgery and 3 did not complete the study because they left the hospital. Sixty patients (33 women, 27 men) completed the study. Recovery time was significantly shorter in the propofol group (n = 30) compared with the desflurane group (n = 30) (8.0 [0.77] vs 9.2 [0.66] min, respectively; P < 0.005). Fifteen patients (50.0%) in the propofol group and 20 patients (66.7%) in the desflurane group experienced nausea during the first 24 hours after surgery. The difference was not considered significant. In the propofol group, significantly fewer patients had vomiting episodes compared with those in the desflurane group (2 [6.7%] vs 16 [53.3%]; P < 0.005). Significantly fewer patients in the propofol group required analgesic medication in the first 24 hours after surgery compared with those in the desflurane group (10 [33.3%] vs 15 [50.0%]; P < 0.005). Patients in the propofol group experienced bowel movements in a significantly shorter period of time compared with patients in the desflurane group (8.30 [1.67] vs 9.76 [1.88] hours; P = 0.02). The mean time to flatus occurred significantly sooner after surgery in the propofol group than in the desflurane group (8.70 [1.79] vs 9.46 [2.09] hours; P = 0.01). The duration of hospitalization after surgery was significantly shorter in the propofol group than in the desflurane group (40.60 [3.49] vs 43.60 [3.56] hours; P = 0.03).Conclusion: Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and alfentanil was associated with a significantly reduced rate of PONV and analgesic consumption, shortened recovery time and duration of hospitalization, accelerated onset of bowel movements, and increased patient satisfaction compared with desflurane and alfentanil in these patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery who completed the study.     

后路腰方肌阻滞与肋缘下腹横肌平面阻滞在腹腔镜胆囊切除术后镇痛中的效果对比

目的 探讨超声引导下后路腰方肌阻滞(QLB)和超声引导下肋缘下腹横肌平面阻滞(STAPB)用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)后的镇痛效果.方法 选择2020年6月-2020年12月行择期LC的患者60例,采用随机数表法分为QLB组(n=30)和STAPB组(n=30).全身麻醉诱导前,QLB组行双侧超声引导下后路QLB,ST...     

Intraoperative renal near-infrared spectroscopy indicates developing acute kidney injury in infants undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a case–control study

IntroductionAcute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass in infants. Renal near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is used to evaluate regional oximetry in a non-invasive continuous real-time fashion, and reflects tissue perfusion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between renal oximetry and development of AKI in the operative and post-operative setting in infants undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.MethodsIn this prospective study, we enrolled 59 infants undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery for congenital heart disease for univentricular (n = 26) or biventricular (n = 33) repair. Renal NIRS was continuously measured intraoperatively and for at least 24 hours postoperatively and analysed for the intraoperative and first 12 hours, first 24 hours and first 48 hours postoperatively. The renal oximetry values were correlated with the paediatric risk, injury, failure, loss, end (pRIFLE) classification for AKI, renal biomarkers and the postoperative course.ResultsTwenty-eight (48%) infants developed AKI based on pRIFLE classification. Already during intraoperative renal oximetry and further in the first 12 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours postoperatively, significantly lower renal oximetry values in AKI patients compared with patients with normal renal function were recorded (P < 0.05). Of the 28 patients who developed AKI, 3 (11%) needed renal replacement therapy and 2 (7%) died. In the non-AKI group, no deaths occurred. Infants with decreased renal oximetry values developed significantly higher lactate levels 24 hours after surgery. Cystatin C was a late parameter of AKI, and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin values were not correlated with AKI occurrence.ConclusionOur results suggest that prolonged low renal oximetry values during cardiac surgery correlate with the development of AKI and may be superior to conventional biochemical markers. Renal NIRS might be a promising non-invasive tool of multimodal monitoring of kidney function and developing AKI in infants undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.     

舒芬太尼复合罗哌卡因用于开胸术后硬膜外镇痛的疗效

【目的】观察舒芬太尼或芬太尼复合罗哌卡因用于开胸手术后硬膜外自控镇痛（PCEA）的临床镇痛效果和安全性。【方法】ASAⅠ～Ⅱ级,全麻复合连续硬膜外阻滞麻醉行开胸手术病人70例,随机分为两组（n=35）,使用0．75μg／ml舒芬太尼（S组）或3μg／ml芬太尼（F组）复合0．125％罗哌卡因,术后行PCEA。镇痛泵设定持续背景剂量2mL／h、PCA每次0．5mL,锁定时间15min。观察病人术后镇痛效果,记录术后4h、8h、12h、24h、48h各时间点的疼痛评分（VAS）、镇静评分、PCA使用次数、不良反应和病人满意度。【结果】S组术后8h、24h和48hVAS评分明显低于F组（P〈0．05）;S组各时间点镇静评分均明显大于F组（P〈0．05）;S组PCA按压次数显著低于F组（P〈0．05）;S组病人对PCA的满意度明显高于F组（P〈0．05）。两组恶心、呕吐发生率低,呼吸抑制相比无明显差异。【结论】舒芬太尼复合罗哌卡因用于开胸手术后PCEA,镇痛安全有效,镇痛镇静效果优于芬太尼,不良反应程度较轻。     

MAP0004, orally inhaled dihydroergotamine for acute treatment of migraine: efficacy of early and late treatments

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy of MAP0004, an orally inhaled dihydroergotamine, for acute treatment of migraine when administered at various time points from within 1 hour to more than 8 hours after migraine onset.PATIENTS AND METHODSThis post hoc subanalysis was conducted using data from 902 patients enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-arm, phase 3, multicenter study conducted from July 14, 2008, through March 23, 2009. End points were 2-hour pain relief and pain-free rates in patients who treated a migraine in ≤1 hour, from >1 hour to ≤4 hours, from >4 to ≤8 hours, or in >8 hours after onset of migraine, given that patients may be unwilling or unable to initiate treatment at headache inception.RESULTSTreatment with MAP0004 was significantly more effective than placebo in relieving pain at all treatment points (≤1 hour after start of migraine: 66% [74/112] for MAP0004 vs 41% [48/118] for placebo, P<.001; >1 to ≤4 hours: 60% [91/153] vs 35% [58/168], P<.001; >4 to ≤8 hours: 53% [36/68] vs 30% [16/54], P=.008; and >8 hours: 48% [25/52] vs 24% [11/46], P=.007). Pain-free rates were also significantly higher with MAP0004 than placebo for treatment within 8 hours after migraine onset (≤1 hour: 38% [43/112] for MAP0004 vs 13% [15/118] for placebo, P<.001; >1 to ≤4 hours: 28% [43/153] vs 10% [17/168], P<.001; >4 to ≤8 hours: 22% [15/68] vs 7% [4/54], P<.025) but not at >8 hours (19% [10/52] vs 9% [4/46], P=.106).CONCLUSIONThis post hoc subanalysis shows that MAP0004 was effective in treating migraine irrespective of the time of treatment, even more than 8 hours after onset of migraine pain.     

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dosed-finding study of the antiemetic effects and tolerability of ramosetron in adults undergoing middle ear surgery

BACKGROUND: Ramosetron is a selective serotonin receptor antagonist (SSRA) that is approved for the treatment of emetic symptoms induced by cytotoxic drugs in Japan. We have reported that ramosetron 0.3 mg had comparable efficacy to granisetron 3 mg, another SSRA, in preventing emetic symptoms in adults in the first 48 hours after the start of anesthesia for middle ear surgery. Although it has been shown that a high dose of ramosetron can cause adverse effects (AEs), such as severe headache, the minimal effective dose of ramosetron is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the minimum effective and tolerable dose of ramosetron needed to prevent postoperative emetic symptoms in adult patients undergoing middle ear surgery. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study was conducted at the Department of Anesthesiology, Toride Kyodo General Hospital (Toride, Japan). Patients aged > or =20 years scheduled for middle ear surgery were randomized to receive either placebo or ramosetron at 1 of 3 doses (0.15, 0.3, or 0.6 mg), regardless of body weight, i.v. immediately before anesthesia induction. Emetic symptoms (nausea, retching, or vomiting) occurring from 0 to <24 and 24 to 48 hours after the start of anesthesia were recorded. Other AEs also were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients (55 women, 45 men; mean [SD] age, 44 [12] years; mean [SD] body weight, 56 [8] kg; mean [SD] height, 159 [8] cm) were enrolled. Each treatment group comprised 25 patients. The treatment groups were comparable with regard to demographic characteristics and type of surgery After the second 24 hour postanesthesia period, significantly more patients in the ramosetron 0.3-mg and 0.6-mg groups were emesis free than in the placebo group (both P<0.001). The number of emesis-free patients in the ramosetron 0.15-mg group and the placebo group were similar after both study periods. No significant difference in antiemetic efficacy was found between the ramosetron 0.3-mg and 0.6-mg groups. No relationship between body weight and the efficacy of ramosetron was observed. The incidence of AEs was similar in all 4 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Ramosetron 0.3 mg, regardless of body weight, was more effective than either ramosetron 0.15 mg or placebo and as effective as ramosetron 0.6 mg for the prevention of emetic symptoms in the first 48 hours after the start of anesthesia in this selected population of adult patients who underwent middle ear surgery.     

Efficacy and Safety of an Intravenous Acetaminophen/Ibuprofen Fixed-dose Combination After Bunionectomy: a Randomized,Double-blind,Factorial, Placebo-controlled Trial

PurposeMultimodal analgesia with acetaminophen and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is recommended for the treatment of postoperative pain. Although oral fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) are available, parenteral administration may be clinically justified. The goal of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of an intravenous FDC of ibuprofen and acetaminophen after bunionectomy.MethodsThis study was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled factorial clinical trial conducted at 2 clinical research centers in the United States between November 2016 and June 2017. Eligible patients (male and female subjects, aged 18–65 years, reporting pain intensity levels ≥40 mm on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) after distal, first metatarsal bunionectomy) were randomized (3:3:3:2) to receive the FDC (ibuprofen 300 mg + acetaminophen 1000 mg), ibuprofen 300 mg, acetaminophen 1000 mg, or placebo (vehicle), administered as 15-minute intravenous infusions every 6 hours for 48 hours. The primary efficacy end point was the time-adjusted sum of pain intensity differences from baseline over 48 hours (SPID₄₈). In addition to VAS pain intensity scores, pain relief scores, time to perceptible and meaningful pain relief, the use of rescue medication, and participant's global evaluations of the study drug were recorded. Adverse events occurring during the 48-hour treatment period were included in the safety analysis.FindingsA total of 276 participants were enrolled; most were female (82%), the mean age was 42.4 years, and the median baseline VAS was 67 mm, indicating moderate to severe pain. SPID₄₈ was significantly higher for the FDC (23.4 [2.5] mm) than for ibuprofen (9.5 [2.5] mm), acetaminophen (10.4 [2.5] mm), and placebo (−1.3 [3.1] mm; all, P < 0.001). The superior analgesic effect of the FDC was supported by a range of secondary end points, including reduced opioid usage rates (75% for FDC, 92% for ibuprofen, 93% for acetaminophen, and 96% for placebo; all, P < 0.005). The safety profile of the FDC was comparable to that of intravenous ibuprofen or acetaminophen alone. Three participants withdrew from the study due to adverse events: 2 in the ibuprofen group and 1 in the acetaminophen group.ImplicationsThe study found that repeated administration of an intravenous FDC of ibuprofen and acetaminophen provided statistically significant improvement in SPID₄₈ over comparable doses of either monotherapy without an increase in adverse events. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02689063.     

不同剂量舒芬太尼复合曲马多用于老年髋部手术后患者静脉自控镇痛

[目的]评价不同剂量舒芬太尼复合曲马多用于老年髋部手术后静脉自控镇痛（PCIA）的效果.[方法]选择本院在连续硬膜外麻醉下择期髋部手术老年患者60例,随机分为三组.A组：舒芬太尼 50 μg ＋曲马多300 mg;B组：舒芬太尼100 μg ＋曲马多300 mg;C组：舒芬太尼150 μg ＋曲马多300 mg.三组镇痛药物均加入氟哌啶2.5 mg,用生理盐水稀释至100 mL.手术结束前连接PCA泵,镇痛模式为负荷剂量2 mL,持续剂量 1. 2 mL/h, PCA为 2 mL,锁定时间 20 min,全程观察24 h.分别于术后 2～4 h、8～10 h、12～20 h、22～24 h访视记录患者 VAS评分,镇痛药用量、PCA按压次数、Ramsay镇静评分和生命体征及不良反应.[结果]术后 24 h各时段 B、C两组 VAS评分均低于A组（P〈0.05）;与B组相比较,C组8～10 h、12～20 h VAS评分均降低（P〈0.05）;各时段 B、C两组镇痛药用量明显少于A组（P〈0.05）.在 2～4 h、8～10 h时间段 PCA有效按压次数 B、C两组明显低于 A组（P〈0.05）;三组患者各时段 Ramsay镇静评分未见明显差异.[结论]150 μg舒芬太尼复合300 mg曲马多用于老年髋部手术后患者PCIA,临床效果好,安全可靠.     

Symptom to door interval in febrile neutropenia: perspective in India

Purpose

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is an oncological emergency to be treated within an hour. In a developing country, patients are often unable to reach hospital speedily. Our aim was to determine the symptom to door interval (SDI) in febrile neutropenic children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia [ALL] and to identify factors resulting in delay.

Methods

All consecutive children of ALL (< 14 years) presenting with FN over a period of 1 year were evaluated. Data for demographics, clinical details, phase of therapy, profile of caregivers, travelling time, SDI, reasons for delay, modes of transport, complications, invasive bacterial infections (IBI), length of hospital stay and outcome were recorded.

Results

Among 320 FN episodes, median SDI (in hours) was 24 (IQR 8, 36). SDI during intensive phases was significantly less as compared to nonintensive phases 12 (IQR 6, 24) and 24 (IQR 24, 48) (p?<?0.001). Children on induction phase reported to hospital at earliest [median 8 (IQR 4, 12)], while those on maintenance phase came late [median 36 (24, 48)]. Median travelling time was 15 min (IQR 15, 25) for patients on intensive phase and was 180 min (IQR 60, 285) for those on nonintensive phase (p<?0.001). Ingestion of acetaminophen at home (30 %), inability to realise the gravity of the situation (27 %), unawareness of parents (9 %) and nonavailability of transport (12 %) were the most common reasons for delay. No significant association of SDI was seen with complications, IBI, duration of hospital stay and mortality (p?>?0.05).

Conclusions

Considerable time lag was seen between onset of symptoms and reaching hospital. Health education and establishment of shared care are urgent needs in countries where tertiary care facilities are limited.