Use of middle hepatic vein in right lobe living donor liver transplantation

The harvesting of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) with the right lobe graft for living‐donor liver transplantation allows an optimal venous drainage for the recipient; however, it is an extensive operation for the donor. This is a prospective, nonrandomized study evaluating liver functions and early clinical outcome in donors undergoing right hepatectomy with or without MHV harvesting. From August 2005 to July 2007, a total of 100 donor right hepatectomies were performed with (n = 49) or without (n = 51) the inclusion of the MHV. The decision to take MHV was based on an algorithm that considers various donor and recipient factors. There was no donor mortality in donors in either group. Overall complication rate was higher in MHV (+) donor group, however when remnant liver volume was kept above 30%, complication rates were similar between the groups. The results of this study show that right hepatectomy including the MHV neither affects morbidity nor impairs early liver function in donors when remnant volume is kept above 30%. The decision, therefore, of the extent of right lobe donor hepatectomy should be tailored to the particular conditions considering the graft quality and metabolic demand of the recipient.     

Reconstruction of middle hepatic vein in living donor liver transplantation with modified right lobe graft: a single center experience

Although a right liver graft without the middle hepatic vein (MHV) can cause congestion in the anterior segment, the reconstruction of MHV tributaries and the complex procedure remain controversial. Between November 2006 and October 2007, right liver transplantation without the MHV was performed in 31 cases. A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data and two groups were formed: with MHV reconstruction (Group I, n  = 16) and without MHV reconstruction (Group II, n  = 15). We analyzed the serum liver function markers at 3 weeks postoperatively and evaluated vascular flow in the graft and interpositional vein daily by Doppler ultrasonography during the hospital stay and monthly follow-up after discharge. One patient (6.7%) died of liver congestion and acute hepatic rejection on the postoperative day 10 in Group II. Congestion was observed in another three cases (20%) of Group II and one case (6.25%) of Group I. The levels of alanine transferase and aspartate transferase in Group II was higher than those in Group I in the first week after transplantation, albeit not significantly. In Group I, most of the interpositional vein grafts were the recipient's portal veins. Venoplasty in the graft was performed in three cases. All the interpositional veins and tectonic outflow orifices were detected to be patent by ultrasonography within 14 days after transplantation. The reconstruction of the MHV tributaries is necessary in the right liver graft without MHV according to our policy and better criteria for MHV reconstruction should be established. The recipient's portal vein is an optimal choice for the interpositional vein and hepatic venoplasty in living donor liver transplantation can simplify the operation and ensure excellent venous drainage.     

Safety of donor right hepatectomy for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation

The purpose of this study was to ascertain the usefulness of preoperative evaluations of donors by computed tomography (CT) volumetry and CT cholangiography for prevention of unexpected liver failure and biliary complications after donor right hepatectomy for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation. Fifty-two donors who underwent right hepatectomy without the middle hepatic vein were enrolled in this study. The values of graft weight (GW) were significantly correlated with those of estimated graft volume (GV; P < 0.0001). GW was predicted by the following formula: GW = 155.25 + 0.658 x GV; r(2) = 0.489. CT cholangiography revealed anatomical variants of biliary structure in one-third of the donors and also clearly showed one or two small biliary branches from the caudate lobe to the right hepatic ducts or the confluence in 58% of the donors. Biliary leakage, which was treated by conservative therapy, occurred in only one donor (1.9%). No donors received homologous blood transfusion. Hyperbilirubinemia (serum total bilirubin >5 mg/dl) occurred in 5.8% of the donors during their early postoperative periods. Precise evaluations of liver remnant volume by CT volumetry and biliary variation by CT cholangiography are essential for performing safe donor hepatectomy, preventing hepatic insufficiency and minimizing the risk of biliary tract complications.     

Pure laparoscopic living donor hepatectomy: Focus on 55 donors undergoing right hepatectomy

Although laparoscopic donor hepatectomy is increasingly common, few centers with substantial experience have reported the results of pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH). Here, we report the experiences of 60 consecutive liver donors undergoing pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (PLDH), with most undergoing right hepatectomy. None of the 60 donors who underwent PLDH had intraoperative complications and none required transfusions, reoperation, or conversion to open hepatectomy. Forty‐five donors who underwent PLDRH between November 2015 and December 2016 were compared with 42 who underwent conventional donor right hepatectomy (CDRH) between May 2013 and February 2014. The total operation time was longer (330.7 vs 280.0 minutes; P < .001) and the percentage with multiple bile duct openings was higher (53.3% vs 26.2%; P = .010) in the PLDRH group. However, the length of postoperative hospital stay (8.4 vs 8.2 days; P = .495) and rate of complications (11.9% vs 8.9%; P = .733) and re‐hospitalizations (4.8% vs 4.4%; P = 1.000) were similar in both groups. PLDH, including PLDRH, is feasible when performed by a highly experienced surgeon and transplant team. Further evaluation, including long‐term results, may support these preliminary findings of comparative outcomes for donors undergoing PLDRH and CDRH.     

Clinical significance of right hepatectomy along the main portal fissure on donors in living donor liver transplantation

There might be discordance between inter‐lobar borders of the main portal fissure (MPF) using the middle hepatic vein (MHV) and of the portal segmentation. Forty‐five living donors who underwent right hepatectomy for the adult recipients from 2007 to 2011 in a tertiary hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The donors were classified into conventional right hepatectomy along the MPF (cRL group, n = 26) and modified right hepatectomy along right‐side shifted transection plane from the MPF (mRL group, n = 19). The cRL donors had higher postoperative peak level of INR (1.84 vs. 1.62; P = 0.022), and bilirubin (3.37 mg/dl vs. 2.74 mg/dl; P = 0.065) than the mRL donors. cRL donors experienced greater depression of platelet count (144 per nL vs. 168 per nL; P = 0.042) and enlargement of splenic volume (52% vs. 37%; P = 0.025) than mRL donors for 7 days after hepatectomy. The regeneration of the left lateral sector was more accelerated in the cRL donors than the mRL donors for postoperative 3 months (148% vs. 84%; P = 0.015). There were no differences in the post‐transplant graft function, incidence of complications, and graft survival rates between the two groups of recipients (P > 0.05). This study suggests that the conventional right hepatectomy along the MHV might increase donor risk by reducing parenchymal liver volume of the segment IV.     

Remnant liver regeneration and spleen volume changes after living liver donation: influence of the middle hepatic vein

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Graft harvest with or without the middle hepatic vein (MHV) affects venous return and function of the remaining liver. The aims of this study are to compare the remnant liver volume and spleen changes in the donors of different types of graft harvest and to evaluate the influence of resection with or without the MHV on the remnant liver volume regeneration, spleen volume change and serum total bilirubin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 165 donors were grouped according to the type of graft harvest: 88 donors underwent left lateral segmentectomy (LLS), 10 donors underwent extend LLS or left lobectomy (LL), and 67 donors underwent right lobectomy (RL). Groups LLS and LL were later combined as group LH (left hepatectomy, n = 98). There were 68 men and 97 women. The mean age was 32.9 +/- 8.1 yr. The total liver volume (LV) and spleen volume (S1) before graft harvest, graft weight (GW), regenerated liver volume (LV(6m)) and spleen volume (S2) six months post-donation were calculated. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the regenerated liver volume six months postoperation (LV(6m)) and recovery ratio (LV(6m)/LV x 100%) among the different groups, albeit significant smaller LV(6m) in both groups compared with the initial liver volume was noted. Postoperative spleen volume (S2), average spleen ratio (S2/S1) and spleen change ratio were significantly larger and higher in group RL than in group LH. A significant increase in spleen volume was noted in both groups six months after graft harvest. A significantly higher TB in group RL (4.1 +/- 1.7 mg/dL, range: 1.4-8.5 mg/dL) was noted compared with that of group LH (1.6 +/- 1.0 mg/dL, range: 0.7-6.2 mg/dL). CONCLUSION: There was a significant increase in the regenerated remnant liver and splenic volumes six months postoperation in all types of hepatectomy following living donor hepatectomy, and there was no difference in the mean TB levels among donors whether the MHV was included or not in the graft.     

Anatomy of the right liver lobe: a surgical analysis in 124 consecutive living donors

Bageacu S, Abdelaal A, Ficarelli S, ElMeteini M, Boillot O. Anatomy of the right liver lobe: a surgical analysis in 124 consecutive living donors.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: E447–E454. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: Understanding anatomic variations of the right lobe is fundamental in adult to adult living donor liver transplantation. Methods: We analysed anatomy in 124 right liver (RL) donors. Results: Portal vein: normal anatomy was found in 85.5% donors. In 14.5% the main right portal vein (PV) was absent. Hepatic artery: single arterial inflow of the RL was identified in 96% of donors. In 4% two arterial stumps were found. Bile duct: classic anatomy was identified in 50.8% of donors; 9.7% had a trifurcation of the common bile duct; in 7.2% the right anterior and in 15.3% the right posterior bile duct opened into the left bile duct; one segmental bile duct opened directly into the common bile duct in 12.1% and two segmental bile ducts in 4.8%. Hepatic veins (HV): in 74.3% the right HV was the single outflow; in 24.2% significant accessory HV (>5 mm) were preserved, in 2.4% the middle HV was harvested. We found that patients with PV variations had high incidence of multiple bile ducts (88.9%) while patients with single right PV had lower incidence (42.4%) (p = 0.00026). Conclusion: While anatomic variations in the RL donor were common, no contraindication to RL harvesting was noted in this study.     

采用不含肝中静脉的右半肝行成人间活体肝移植

目的探讨采用不含肝中静脉的右半肝行成人间活体肝移植的可行性及安全性。方法2002年1月至2005年8月,我院施行了16例成人间右半肝活体肝移植,术中采用了不含肝中静脉的右半肝移植物,同时进行了一系列改良的手术技术包括肝右静脉的重建,右肝下静脉的重建,肝中静脉分支的搭桥等改进。结果全组供者无严重并发症及死亡。前2例受者中,1例发生肝静脉吻合口狭窄,1例因发生小肝综合征,死于肝功进行性恶化。后14例受者中发生并发症5例:急性排斥反应,肝动脉栓塞,胆漏,左膈下脓肿及肺部感染各1例;1例再移植术后肺部感染死于MODS。14例中除肝右静脉与下腔静脉(IVC)直接吻合外,其中5例加行右肝下静脉重建,另5例采用自体大隐静脉搭桥行肝中静脉分支与IVC重建,保证了右肝的流出道通畅。移植物与受者重量比(GRWR)为0.72%~1.15%,11例<1.0%,其中2例<0.8%,无小肝综合征发生。结论采用了改进的手术技术,特别是肝静脉流出道的充分重建可有效的避免小肝综合征,从而使采用不含肝中静脉的活体右半肝移植成为安全可靠的手术方式。     

Extent of hepatectomy on splenic hypertrophy and platelet count in live liver donors

The extent of donor hepatectomy may affect splenic hypertrophy and platelet count. The subjects were 50 live liver donors. The ratio of the graft weight to total liver volume (GW/TLV) and the splenic hypertrophy ratio, expressed as the splenic volume one month after surgery divided by that before surgery, were calculated. The platelet count one month after surgery was divided by that before surgery to determine the rate of the platelet count decrease. The correlation of GW/TLV to the splenic hypertrophy ratio and the rate of the platelet count decrease were examined. The median (range) GW/TLV was 54 (28-71)%. The splenic hypertrophy ratio and the rate of the platelet count decrease was 133 (99-191)% and 92 (71-129)%, respectively. GW/TLV positively correlated with the splenic hypertrophy ratio (Spearman's correlation coefficient (r(s)) = 0.448, p = 0.001), and negatively correlated with the rate of the platelet count decrease (r(s) = -0.471, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that GW/TLV influenced the splenic hypertrophy ratio [adjusted odds ratio (OR), 12.0; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.32-9.04; p = 0.01] and the ratio of the platelet count decrease (adjusted OR, 11.6; 95% CI, 1.40-8.33; p = 0.01). Larger graft procurement might place living liver donors at higher risk for post-operative thrombocytopenia.     

活体肝移植供体手术及术后管理（附22例临床分析）

目的 探讨提高活体肝移植供体手术安全性和加强术后管理的措施。方法 回顾性分析北京大学人民医院2003年2月至2009年6月22例活体肝移植供体的临床资料,总结供体术前评估、手术技术、术后并发症及随访情况。结果 术前对供体进行三步法评估,术中采用超吸刀 （CUSA）进行肝脏实质分离,术后定期随访。供肝移植物包括肝左外叶2例、左半肝6例、扩大左半肝1例、右半肝5例和扩大右半肝8例。1例在术后早期出现腹腔内出血,1例合并胸水,1例枕后皮下血肿,其他供体未出现严重并发症,术后肝功能迅速恢复正常,随访至今无供体死亡。结论 活体肝移植供体手术复杂,严格术前评估,术中精细操作,术后加强随访是提高活体肝移植供体安全的重要保证。     

Impact of biliary complications in right lobe living donor liver transplantation

Biliary reconstruction is one of the most challenging parts of right lobe living donor liver transplantation (RL LDLT), and biliary complications have been reported as the first source of surgical complications of this procedure. We reviewed biliary reconstruction and complications in 27 consecutive RL LDLTs. We compared the first 14 procedures (group 1) to the last 13 (group 2). Seven patients (25.9%) experienced a biliary complication (five leaks and two strictures). The incidence of biliary complications was 11.1% in RL grafts with a single duct and 55.5% in graft presenting multiple bile ducts (P = 0.03). Four of the 18 patients with a duct-to-duct reconstruction (22.2%) and three of the 11 patients with a Roux-en-Y reconstruction (27.3%) developed a biliary complication (P = ns). The incidence of biliary complications significantly decreased from 42.9% (n = 6) in the first group to 7.6% (n = 1) in the second group (P = 0.05). The overall 1-year graft and patient survival were 57.1% and 64.3% in group 1 versus 100.0% and 100% in group 2 (P = 0.01; P = 0.006). Biliary complications remain one of the most important technical complications affecting RL LDLT. Nevertheless, attention and surgical refinement can lead to a significant reduction of the biliary complication rate, improving graft and patient survival.     

腹腔镜辅助活体供者右半肝切取临床应用(附视频)

目的探讨腹腔镜辅助技术在活体肝移植供者右半肝切取中的应用。方法从2011年7月4日至11月1日,四川大学华西医院已完成7例腹腔镜辅助活体肝移植供者右半肝切取(不包括肝中静脉)手术,总结手术方法及其要点。结果 7例供者均未中途转为开放手术。腹腔镜辅助活体供肝切取平均手术时间(6.04±0.36)h,术中平均出血量(150±40)mL。1例供者围手术期出现右侧肋缘下穿刺孔肌肉出血,术后8h予以手术止血成功。余6例供者未发生Clavien-Dindo外科并发症分级二级以上并发症。供者住院费用无明显增加。未观察到腹腔镜辅助手术对移植物的不良影响。结论腹腔镜辅助部分供肝切取明显减少了供者手术创伤,缩短了供者住院时间,值得在活体肝移植供者手术中推广。     

大泡性脂肪变性对活体肝移植右半肝供者早期预后的影响

目的 研究轻度大泡性脂肪变性对活体肝移植供者右半肝切除术后早期肝功能恢复及再生的影响.方法 回顾性分析2007年10月至2009年5月间本移植外科小组完成的95例活体肝移植术(living donorlivertransplantation LDLT)供者的临床资料.术中冰冻活检发现15例存在轻度大泡性脂肪变性(20%～30%5例,10%～19%10例)(A组),80例无明显脂肪变性(B组).比较两组术前基本资料及术后临床结果.结果 单因素分析发现A、B两组术前平均年龄、性别比、残肝体积比、保留肝中静脉/不保留肝中静脉比无显著差异(P=0.870,P=0.608,P=0.928,P=0.196),但A组体重指数(BMI)显著高于B组(P=0.013).t检验发现A组术后总胆红素(TBIL)、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)峰值显著高于B组(P=0.001,P=0.039),2组术后半月的肝脏再生率无显著差异(P=0.939);Logistic多因素统计分析发现轻度大泡性脂肪变性是导致供者术后高胆红素血症的危险因素(OR=5.375,95%可信区间1.467-19.696,P=0.011).结论 轻度大泡性脂肪变性是术后高胆红素血症的独立危险因素,从供者安全性考虑,对活体肝移植供者需仔细进行术前评估.     

Congestion of the donor remnant right liver after extended left lobe donation

The clinical importance of congestion of the remnant right lobe has not yet been fully elucidated in donors who donate their left lobe with the middle hepatic vein. The impact of congestion on clinical course and liver regeneration in 52 donor remnant livers were evaluated. The donors were divided into three groups according to the degree of the congestion: the mild [congestion ratio (CR) < 10%], moderate (CR ranged from 10% to 25%) and severe congestion groups (CR > 25%). The regeneration ratio of the graft at postoperative day 7 (7 POD) was 22.0 ± 14.3% and inversely correlated with the CR in the remnant right lobe ( P  =   0.003). Aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase at 7 POD were significantly higher in the severe CR group in comparison to the mild CR group ( P  =   0.003 and 0.019, respectively), but those of the three groups were comparable at 30 POD. The hospital stays were significantly longer in the severe CR group ( P  =   0.010). In conclusion, the congestion of the donors' remnant right liver can lead the transient liver dysfunction and poor regeneration. Therefore, the conversion of the graft from the left to right lobe might be appropriate according to the degree of the congestion.     

Portal vein complications after adult‐to‐adult living donor liver transplantation

Successful management of portal vein (PV) complications after liver transplantation is crucial to long‐term success. Little information is available, however, regarding the incidence and treatment of PV complications after adult‐to‐adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Between January 1996 and October 2006, 310 adult LDLTs were performed at our institution. PV thrombus was present in 54 patients at the time of LDLT. The incidence of PV complications, choice of therapeutic intervention, and outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. Among the 310 recipients, PV complications were identified in 28 (9%). Risk factors included smaller graft size, presence of PV thrombus at the time of LDLT, and use of jump or interposition cryo‐preserved vein grafts for PV reconstruction. When divided into early (within 3 months, n = 11) and late (after 3 months, n = 17) complications, the use of vein grafts for PV reconstruction predisposed to the occurrence of late, but not early, PV complications. Portal vein thrombosis occurred more frequently in the early period (eight out of 11, 73%), whereas stenosis occurred more frequently in the later period (14 out of 17, 82%). Surgical interventions were favored in the earlier period, whereas interventional radiologic approaches were selected for later events. Overall 3‐ and 5‐year survival rates were 81% and 77%, respectively, in patients with PV complications and 88% and 84%, respectively, in those without PV complications (P = 0.21, log‐rank test). PV complications are a significant problem following LDLT with both early and late manifestations. Acceptable long‐term results, however, are achievable with periodic ultrasonographic surveillance and timely conventional therapeutic interventions. The use of cryo‐preserved vein grafts for reconstructing portal flow should be discouraged.     

Hepatic artery reconstruction and successful management of its complications in living donor liver transplantation using a right lobe

Kim S‐J, Yoon Y‐C, Park J‐H, Oh D‐Y, Yoo Y‐K, Kim D‐G. Hepatic artery reconstruction and successful management of its complications in living donor liver transplantation using a right lobe.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: 929–938. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: The aim of the present study was to improve the techniques of hepatic artery (HA) reconstruction and to properly manage arterial complications after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Methods: Prospectively collected data collected from 371 patients who underwent adult LDLT using a right lobe from January 2000 to August 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Of 17 patients (4.6%, 17/371) with double HA stumps in the graft, 12 patients (70.6%) received dual HA reconstruction. HA complications were composed of thrombosis (n = 6), pseudoaneurysm (n = 2), and stenosis (n = 4), showing 3.2% (12/371) of incidence. In patients with HA thrombosis, whereas operative thrombectomies with re‐anastomosis rescued all the grafts in early attack (n = 3, ≤1 wk), angiographic thrombolysis successfully reestablished the flow in patients with late attack (n = 3, >1 wk). In all patients with HA complications, except for one, all of our treatment modalities – operation and angiographic intervention – resulted in successful rescue of grafts and no patient received re‐transplantation because of HA complications. Conclusion: Prompt diagnosis of HA complications by serial post‐operative Doppler ultrasound and corresponding treatment strategies, including operative and radiological intervention, can rescue both grafts and patients without necessitating re‐transplantation.