Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: Where are we?

Peritoneal surface malignancies are generally associated with poor prognosis. In daily clinical routine, systemic chemotherapy is still considered the only reasonable therapy despite of encouraging results of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) along with intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy (HIPEC). The Achilles heel of CRS and HIPEC is appropriate patient selection and precise surgical technique preventing patients from excessive morbidity and mortality. Given these findings, new concepts of second look surgery for high risk patients allow detection of peritoneal spread ahead of clinical symptoms or presence of peritoneal masses reducing perioperative morbidity. In addition, personalized intraperitoneal chemotherapy might further improve outcome by appreciating individual tumor biology. These days, every physician should be aware of CRS and HIPEC for treatment of peritoneal surface malignancies. Since there is now sufficient data for the superiority of CRS and HIPEC to systemic chemotherapy in selected patients, our next goal should be providing this strategy with minimal morbidity and mortality even in the presence of higher tumor load.     

Colorectal peritoneal metastases: Optimal management review

The peritoneum is a common site of dissemination for colorrectal cancer, with a poorer prognosis than other sites of metastases. In the last two decades, it has been considered as a locoregional disease progression and treated as such with curative intention treatments. Cytoreductive surgery(CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy(HIPEC) is the actual reference treatment for these patients as better survival results have been reached as compared to systemic chemotherapy alone, but its therapeutic efficacy is still under debate. Actual guidelines recommend that the management of colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases should be led by a multidisciplinary team carried out in experienced centers and consider CRS + HIPEC for selected patients. Accumulative evidence in the last three years suggests that this is a curative treatment that may improve patients disease-free survival, decrease the risk of recurrence, and does not increase the risk of treatment-related mortality. In this review we aim to gather the latest results from referral centers and opinions from experts about the effectiveness and feasibility of CRS + HIPEC for treating peritoneal disease from colorectal malignancies.     

肿瘤细胞减灭术加腹腔热灌注化疗治疗结直肠癌腹膜转移癌的临床研究

目的：探讨肿瘤细胞减灭术（CRS）加腹腔热灌注化疗（HIPEC）治疗结直肠癌腹膜转移癌（ CRC PC）的疗效及安全性。方法选取结直肠癌腹膜转移癌（ CRC PC）患者67例,随机分为治疗组（ CRS＋HIPEC）38例,对照组（CRS＋静脉辅助化疗）29例,比较两组的生存期、生存率、术后并发症及化疗毒副作用。结果治疗组中位生存期23.0个月,显著长于对照组的11.0个月（ P＜0.01）,治疗组1、2、3年生存率分别为70.9％、45.7％、8.2％,分别优于对照组的68.8％、21.2％、0％。术后并发症发生率两组相似（ P＞0.05）。化疗毒副作用：对照组恶心呕吐、白细胞减少、血小板减少发生率较治疗组高（P＜0.01）,而治疗组腹胀、腹泻发生率较对照组高（ P＜0.01或P＜0.05）;两组其他毒副作用相似（ P＞0.05）。结论 CRS＋HIPEC治疗CRC PC能明显延长患者生存期,并发症和化疗毒副作用并没有明显增加。     

Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal metastases

AIM: To systematically review the available evidence regarding cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) for colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM).METHODS: An electronic literature search was carried out to identify publications reporting oncological outcome data (overall survival and/or disease free survival and/or recurrence rates) following CRS and IPC for treatment of CPM. Studies reporting outcomes following CRS and IPC for cancer subtypes other than colorectal were only included if data were reported independently for colorectal cancer-associated cases; in addition studies reporting outcomes for peritoneal carcinomatosis of appendiceal origin were excluded.RESULTS: Twenty seven studies, published between 1999 and 2013 with a combined population of 2838 patients met the predefined inclusion criteria. Included studies comprised 21 case series, 5 case-control studies and 1 randomised controlled trial. Four studies provided comparative oncological outcome data for patients undergoing CRS in combination with IPC vs systemic chemotherapy alone. The primary indication for treatment was CPM in 96% of cases (2714/2838) and recurrent CPM (rCPM) in the remaining 4% (124/2838). In the majority of included studies (20/27) CRS was combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). In 3 studies HIPEC was used in combination with early post-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC), and 2 studies used EPIC only, following CRS. Two studies evaluated comparative outcomes with CRS + HIPEC vs CRS + EPIC for treatment of CPM. The delivery of IPC was performed using an “open” or “closed” abdomen approach in the included studies.CONCLUSION: The available evidence presented in this review indicates that enhanced survival times can be achieved for CPM after combined treatment with CRS and IPC.     

Advances in the management of peritoneal mesothelioma

Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (PM) is an infrequent disease which has historically been associated with a poor prognosis. Given its long latency period and non-specific symptomatology, a diagnosis of PM can be suggested by occupational exposure history, but ultimately relies heavily on imaging and diagnostic biopsy. Early treatment options including palliative operative debulking, intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and systemic chemotherapy have marginally improved the natural course of the disease with median survival being approximately one year. The advent of cytoreduction (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has dramatically improved survival outcomes with wide median survival estimates between 2.5 to 9 years; these studies however remain largely heterogeneous, with differing study populations, tumor biology, and specific treatment regimens. More recent investigations have explored extent of cytoreduction, repeated operative intervention, and choice of chemotherapy but have been unable to offer definitive conclusions. CRS and HIPEC remain morbid procedures with complication rates ranging between 30% to 46% in larger series. Accordingly, an increasing interest in identifying molecular targets and developing targeted therapies is emerging. Among such novel targets is sphingosine kinase 1 (SphK1) which regulates the production of sphingosine-1-phosphate, a biologically active lipid implicated in various cancers including malignant mesothelioma. The known action of specific SphK inhibitors may warrant further exploration in peritoneal disease.     

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in gastric cancer

Gastric cancer associated peritoneal carcinomatosis(GCPC) has a poor prognosis with a median survival of less than one year. Systemic chemotherapy including targeted agents has not been found to significantly increase the survival in GCPC. Since recurrent gastric cancer remains confined to the abdominal cavity in many patients, regional therapies like aggressive cytoreductive surgery( CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy(HIPEC) have been investigated for GCPC. HIPEC has been used for three indications in GC- as an adjuvant therapy after a curative surgery, HIPEC has been shown to improve survival and reduce peritoneal recurrences in many randomised trials in Asian countries; as a definitive treatment in established PC, HIPEC along with CRS is the only therapeutic modality that has resulted in longterm survival in select groups of patients; as a palliative treatment in advanced PC with intractable ascites, HIPEC has been shown to control ascites and reduce the need for frequent paracentesis. While the results of randomised trials of adjuvant HIPEC from western centres are awaited, the role of HIPEC in the treatment of GCPC is still evolving and needs larger studies before it is accepted as a standard of care.     

“En bloc” caudate lobe and inferior vena cava resection following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal and liver metastasis of colorectal cancer

There are diverse protocols to manage patients with recurrent disease after primary cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal carcinomatosis. We describe a case of metachronous liver metastasis after CRS and HIPEC for colorectal cancer, successfully treated with a selective metastectomy and partial graft of the inferior vena cava. A 35-year-old female presented with a large tumour in the cecum and consequent colonic stenosis. After an emergency right colectomy, the patient received adjuvant chemotherapy. One year later she was diagnosed with peritoneal carcinomatosis, and it was decided to carry out a CRS/HIPEC. After 2 years of total remission, an isolated metachronous liver metastasis was detected by magnetic resonance imaging surveillance. The patient underwent a third procedure including a caudate lobe and partial inferior vena cava resection with a prosthetic graft interposition, achieving an R0 situation. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 17 after the liver resection. At 18-mo follow-up after the liver resection the patient remained free of recurrence. In selected patients, the option of re-operation due to recurrent disease should be discussed. Even liver resection of a metachronous metastasis and an extended vascular resection are acceptable after CRS/HIPEC and can be considered as a potential treatment option to remove all macroscopic lesions.     

肿瘤细胞减灭术联合腹腔热灌注化疗（CRS/HIPEC）治疗结直肠癌腹膜转移的现状和进展

腹膜是结直肠癌转移的好发部位。结直肠癌发生腹膜转移长期以来被认为预后很差,主要采用姑息性手段治疗。尽管化疗及靶向治疗在结直肠癌治疗上有很大进展,但对于腹膜转移的结直肠癌疗效并不理想。最近越来越多的证据表明,肿瘤细胞减灭术(CRS)联合腹腔内热灌注化疗(HIPEC)的治疗方法能给这部分患者带来较大的生存获益。本文综述了结直肠癌腹膜转移的诊治现状和相关进展。目前认为CRS联合HIPEC对选择的结直肠癌腹膜转移患者是一种安全有效的治疗模式,但HIPEC能否预防进展期结直肠癌发生腹膜转移,还有待进一步的临床试验研究。     

Management of peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer: review of the literature

Background

Today, we do not have a universally accepted evidence on how to treat peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from colorectal cancer (CRC) in international guidelines.

Methods

The present study is a review of the literature investigating current strategies to treat CRC PC.

Results

Despite the progresses of systemic chemotherapy, the presence of PC among patients with metastatic CRC reduces the overall survival to 30 %, and only 4 % of patients with PC from CRC treated are alive for 5 years. Many trials evaluate the combined treatment of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for CRC PC, suggesting a survival benefit in highly selected patients. Only one trial is randomized and presents some biases. The two main prognostic factors are Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) and completeness of cytoreduction score (CC score). There is no universal agreement on how to approach the synchronous presence of PC and liver metastasis with a curative intent during the same procedure. A growing interest among the scientific community has arisen about systematic second-look surgery and HIPEC treatment in high-risk patients.

Conclusion

Current evidences suggest that CRS and HIPEC might be beneficial in highly selected patients affected with PC from CRC. Anyway, today, there is a shortage of well-designed phase 3 trials.     

Chinese expert consensus on cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal malignancies

Locoregional spread of abdominopelvic malignant tumors frequently results in peritoneal carcinomatosis(PC). The prognosis of PC patients treated by conventional systemic chemotherapy is poor, with a median survival of 6 mo. However, over the past three decades, an integrated treatment strategy of cytoreductive surgery(CRS) + hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy(HIPEC) has been developed by the pioneering oncologists, with proved efficacy and safety in selected patients. Supported by several lines of clinical evidence from phases Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ clinical trials, CRS + HIPEC has been regarded as the standard treatment for selected patients with PC in many established cancer centers worldwide. In China, an expert consensus on CRS + HIPEC has been reached by the leading surgical and medical oncologists, under the framework of the China Anti-Cancer Association. This expert consensus has summarized the progress in PC clinical studies and systematically evaluated the CRS + HIPEC procedures in China as well as across the world, so as to lay the foundation for formulating PC treatment guidelines specific to the national conditions of China.     

腹膜转移的结肠癌患者MDT诊治二例

本文描述了2例异时性腹膜转移的结肠癌病例的多学科诊治过程。1例多发转移,1例单发转移。这两例患者经MDT讨论后都首先采用了肿瘤减灭术联合腹腔热灌注化疗的治疗模式（cytoreductive surgery,CRS/hyperthermic intraperitoneal peroperative chemotherapy,HIPEC）,单发转移的患者目前获得了12个月的无病生存期（disease-free survival,DFS）,而多发转移的患者也获得了12个多月的总生存期（overall survival,OS）。目前发现与结直肠癌腹膜转移患者OS相关的因素包括肿瘤减灭术（CRS）完全程度和肿瘤累及的范围（腹膜转移癌指数）等。因此,对于结直肠癌的腹膜转移患者,评估病变范围极其重要,对于较局限的腹膜转移,多学科的综合诊治和积极的治疗手段能改善这部分患者的生存时间和生存质量。     

Second-look surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with colorectal cancer at high risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis: Does it really save lives?

The treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of colorectal origin with cytoreductive surgery(CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has a 5-year recurrence-free or cure rate of at least 16%, so it is no longer labeled as a fatal disease, and offers prolonged survival for patients with a low peritoneal carcinomatosis index. Metachronous PC of colorectal origin is so predictable that there is a model which has been used to successfully determine the individual risk of each patient. Patients at risk are clearly identified; those with the highest risk have small peritoneal nodules present in the first surgery (70% probability of developing PC), ovarian metastases(60%), perforated tumor onset or intraoperative tumor rupture(50%). Current clinical, biological and imaging techniques still lack sufficient sensitivity to diagnose PC in its initial stages, when CRS plus HIPEC has a greater impact and a higher cure rate. Second-look surgery with HIPEC or prophylactic HIPEC at the time of the first intervention have been proposed as means of preventing and/or anticipating clinical or radiological relapse in at-risk patients. Both techniques have shown a significant decrease in peritoneal relapses and should be considered essential weapons in the management of colorectal cancer.     

“En bloc ” caudate lobe and inferior vena cava resection following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal and liver metastasis of colorectal cancer

There are diverse protocols to manage patients with recurrent disease after primary cytoreductive surgery(CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy(HIPEC) for peritoneal carcinomatosis. We describe a case of metachronous liver metastasis after CRS and HIPEC for colorectal cancer, successfully treated with a selective metastectomy and partial graft of the inferior vena cava. A 35-year-old female presented with a large tumour in the cecum and consequent colonic stenosis. After an emergency right colectomy, the patient received adjuvant chemotherapy. One year later she was diagnosed with peritoneal carcinomatosis, and it was decided to carry out a CRS/HIPEC. After 2 years of total remission, an isolated metachronous liver metastasis was detected by magnetic resonance imaging surveillance. The patient underwent a third procedure including a caudate lobe and partial inferior vena cava resection with a prosthetic graft interposition, achieving an R0 situation. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 17 after the liver resection. At 18-mo follow-up after the liver resection the patient remained free of recurrence. In selected patients, the option of re-operation due to recurrent disease should be discussed. Even liver resection of a metachronous metastasis and an extended vascular resection are acceptable after CRS/HIPEC and can be considered as a potential treatment option to remove all macroscopic lesions.     

Surgery for colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis

Peritoneal carcinomatosis occurs in patients with advanced gastrointestinal and gynecological malignancies and also in patients who experience recurrence after treatment failure of the primary tumor. Malignant disease in the peritoneal cavity is a morbid and significant predictor of a diminished survival in a cancer patient. Systemic chemotherapy alone will not be adequate to palliate or treat patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Cytoreductive surgery is a new surgical technique that is performed using peritonectomy procedures to allow total eradication of peritoneal tumors. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimens such as intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) are effective adjuvant treatment to treat the minimal residual disease after cytoreductive surgery to reduce the risk of locoregional recurrence. A substantial body of evidence available in the current literature has documented the survival benefits of combining cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy to treat a previously fatal phase of malignancy. This review provides a summary of the developments in the understanding and treatment of peritoneal surface malignancy from colorectal cancer.     

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric and colorectal cancer in Mainland China

AIM:To investigate the current status of peritoneal carcinomatosis(PC) management,as well as the usage of cytoreductive surgery(CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy(HIPEC) in mainland China.METHODS:A potentially curative therapeutic strategy for selecting patients with PC,known as Techniques,consists of CRS in combination with HIPEC.A systemic search of published works and clinical trials was performed.Additional papers were retrieved by crosschecking references and obtaining information from ...     

Gastro-intestinal toxicity of chemotherapeutics in colorectal cancer:The role of inflammation

Chemotherapy-induced diarrhea(CID)is a common and often severe side effect experienced by colorectal cancer(CRC)patients during their treatment.As chemotherapy regimens evolve to include more efficacious agents,CID is increasingly becoming a major cause of dose limiting toxicity and merits further investigation.Inflammation is a key factor behind gastrointestinal(GI)toxicity of chemotherapy.Different chemotherapeutic agents activate a diverse range of pro-inflammatory pathways culminating in distinct histopathological changes in the small intestine and colonic mucosa.Here we review the current understanding of the mechanisms behind GI toxicity and the mucositis associated with systemic treatment of CRC.Insights into the inflammatory response activated during this process gained from various models of GI toxicity are discussed.The inflammatory processes contributing to the GI toxicity of chemotherapeutic agents are increasingly being recognised as having an important role in the development of anti-tumor immunity,thus conferring added benefit against tumor recurrence and improving patient survival.We review the basic mechanisms involved in the promotion of immunogenic cell death and its relevance in the treatment of colorectal cancer.Finally,the impact of CID on patient outcomes and therapeutic strategies to prevent or minimise the effect of GI toxicity and mucositis are discussed.     

Incidence of leukopenia after intraperitoneal vs combined intravenous/intraperitoneal chemotherapy in pseudomyxoma peritonei

AIM: To investigate the clinical impact of post-hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy(HIPEC) leukopenia, intraperitoneal and combined intravenous/intraperitoneal drug administrations were compared.METHODS: Two patient cohorts were retrospectively analyzed regarding the incidence of postoperative leukopenia. The first cohort(n = 32) received Mitomycin C(MMC)-based HIPEC intraperitoneally(35 mg/m2 for 90 min) and the second cohort(n = 10) received a bidirectional therapy consisting of oxaliplatin(OX)(300 mg/m2 for 30 min) intraperitoneally and 5-fluorouracil(5-FU) 400 mg/m2 plus folinic acid 20 mg/m2 intravenously. The following data were collected retrospectively: Age, sex, length of operation, length of hospital stay, amount of resection including extent of peritonectomy, peritoneal cancer index, CC(completeness of cytoreduction)-status and leukocyte-count before cytoreductive surgery(CRS) and HIPEC, on days 3, 7 and 14 after CRS and HIPEC. HIPEC leukopenia was defined as 4000 cells/m3. RESULTS: Leukopenia occurred statistically more often in the MMC than in the OX/5-FU-group(10/32 vs 0/10; P = 0.042). Leukopenia set-on was on day 7 after CRS and MMC-HIPEC and lasted for two to three days. Three patients(33%) required medical treatment. Patients affected by leukopenia were predominantly female(7/10 patients) and older than 50 years(8/10 patients). Thelength of hospital stay tended to be higher in the MMCgroup without reaching statistical significance(22.5± 11 vs 16.5 ± 3.5 d). Length of operation(08:54 ± 01:44 vs 09:48 ± 02:28 h) were comparable between patients with and without postoperative leukopenia. Prior history of systemic chemotherapy did not trigger postHIPEC leukopenia. Occurrence of leucopenia did not trigger surgical site infections, intraabdominal abscess formations, hospital-acquired pneumonia or anastomotic insufficiencies. CONCLUSION: Surgeons must be aware that there is a higher incidence of postoperative leukopenia in MMCbased HIPEC protocols primarily affecting females and older patients.     

Current status and future strategies of cytoreductive surgery plus intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis

This article is to offer a concise review on the use of cytoreductive surgery （CRS） plus intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy （IPHC） for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis （PC）. Traditionally, PC was treated with systemic chemotherapy alone with very poor response and a median survival of less than 6 too. With the establishment of several phase Ⅱ studies, a new trend has been developed toward the use of CRS plus IPHC as a standard method for treating selected patients with PC, in whom sufficient cytoreduction could be achieved. In spite of the need for more high quality phase Ⅲ studies, there is now a consensus among many surgical oncology experts throughout the world about the use of this new treatment strategy as standard care for colorectal cancer patients with PC. This review summarizes the current status and possible progress in future.     

腹膜转移癌诊疗决策中评分系统的研究进展

腹膜转移是肿瘤的晚期阶段，预后较差。肿瘤细胞减灭术联合腹腔热灌注化疗（CRS+HIPEC）可以显著改善患者预后。患者的预后往往和腹膜疾病的严重程度和CRS肿瘤细胞减灭的程度相关。在术前和术中有各种评分系统合理评估患者腹膜肿瘤负荷，本文对腹膜转移癌诊疗决策中评分系统展开综述。     

Die medikament?se Therapie des kolorektalen Karzinoms

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in the western world. Almost every second patient dies of the disease. The introduction of new and effective chemotherapeutic substances and biologics in the past decade has significantly improved the systemic treatment of patients with CRC. In stage III colon cancer combination chemotherapy with oxaliplatin is the standard of care. In stage IV cancer the choice of therapy is dependent on the clinical status of the patient. For some patients primary resection of metastases or resection after combination therapy and downsizing of lesions offers a chance for cure. In the palliative setting intensive combination treatment is indicated if the patient suffers from tumor related symptoms or a rapid progress of the disease. The aim of palliative therapy is the prolongation of survival and the improvement of quality of life. Combination with monoclonal antibodies leads to further improvement of survival. Furthermore, the introduction of the mutational status of the KRAS oncogene as the first predictive marker into clinical care is an important step towards the individualization of treatment in CRC.