Epidural infusion of clonidine or clonidine plus ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia in children undergoing major abdominal surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the analgesic efficacy and safety of epidural infusion of clonidine in children undergoing major abdominal surgery. DESIGN: Randomized open-label study. SETTING: Postoperative anesthetic unit and pediatric ward of a metropolitan hospital. PATIENTS: Forty children aged 0 to 3 years undergoing major abdominal surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Children were randomly allocated to receive a 24-hour epidural infusion of clonidine 1 microg.mL(-1) at rate of 0.2 mL.kg -1.h -1 preceded by a bolus of 2 microg.kg -1 (CLON group) or a mixture of clonidine 1 microg.mL -1 and ropivacaine 0.1% at rate of 0.2 mL.kg -1.h -1. Both groups received intravenous (IV) ketoprofen 2 mg.kg -1 every 8 hours. Breakthrough pain was treated with IV tramadol 1 mg.kg(-1). MEASUREMENTS: Tramadol requirement, sedation and respiratory and hemodynamic changes were measured. MAIN RESULTS: Approximately 77% and 59.3% of the CLON and CLON+ROPIV groups, respectively, required no tramadol or only one dose over a 24-hour period. Except for those patients who exhibited frequent coughing during the night (4 and 5 patients in the CLON and CLON+ROPIV groups, respectively), no study patients required an analgesic and all had good sleep quality during the first night. Sedation and decreased systolic blood pressure were observed after the clonidine bolus was given. CONCLUSION: For children undergoing major abdominal surgery, the addition of epidural infusion of clonidine or clonidine plus ropivacaine to IV ketoprofen provided good analgesia quality for postoperative rest pain.     

Comparison of the effects of clonidine and ketamine added to ropivacaine on stress hormone levels and the duration of caudal analgesia

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic quality and duration of ropivacaine 0.2% with the addition of clonidine (1 microg.kg(-1)) with that of ropivacaine 0.2% and the addition of ketamine (0.5 mg.kg(-1)) to that of ropivacaine 0.2% and also compare the postoperative cortisol, insulin and glucose concentrations, sampled after induction and 1 h later following caudal administration in children. METHODS: According to the randomization, patients in the ropivacaine group (R; n = 25) received ropivacaine 0.2%, 0.75 ml.kg(-1); those in the clonidine group (RC; n = 25) received ropivacaine 0.2% 0.75 ml.kg(-1) plus clonidine 1 microg.kg(-1) and those in the ketamine/ropivacaine group (RK; n = 25) ropivacaine 0.2% 0.75 ml.kg(-1) plus ketamine 0.5 mg.kg(-1) (10 mg.ml(-1) concentration). Drugs were diluted in 0.9% saline (0.75 ml.kg(-1)) and prepared by a staff anesthesiologist not otherwise involved in the study. In all groups, the duration of analgesia, analgesic requirements, sedation and insulin, glucose, cortisol concentrations were recorded and statistically compared. RESULTS: There were no significant differences among the three study groups with respect to age, weight or duration of surgery. Caudal administration of clonidine 1 microg.kg(-1) or ketamine 0.5 mg.kg(-1) induced a longer duration of analgesia (P < 0.05) compared with ropivacaine alone. Insulin levels were increased and cortisol reduced in all groups. Glucose concentration was increased in all groups and statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Addition of ketamine and clonidine to ropivacaine 0.2% 0.75 ml.kg(-1), when administered caudally in children, prolongs the duration of postoperative analgesia. The need for subsequent postoperative analgesic is also reduced. Caudal analgesia attenuates or allows partial changes to postoperative cortisol, insulin or blood glucose responses to surgery.     

The dose-sparing effect of clonidine added to ropivacaine for labor epidural analgesia

To determine the effects of clonidine with ropivacaine during epidural labor analgesia, we studied 66 nulliparous women in early active labor. Women were randomized to receive ropivacaine 0.1% 8 mL plus 75 microg of clonidine (Group 1), ropivacaine 0.2% 8 mL plus 0.5 mL of NaCl 0.9% (Group 2), or ropivacaine 0.2% 8 mL plus 75 microg of clonidine (Group 3) 5 min after a bupivacaine 7.5 mg with epinephrine 15 microg test dose. Upon request, additional analgesia with ropivacaine 0.1% 8 mL followed by ropivacaine 0.2% 8 mL/h was administered. With clonidine, duration of analgesia was increased (132 +/- 48 min [Group 1] and 154 +/- 42 min [Group 3] versus 91 +/- 44 min [Group 2]; P < 0.05), and total ropivacaine dose over the first 4 h was significantly reduced (40.5 +/- 15 mg [Group 1] and 47.0 +/- 16 mg [Group 3] versus 72.5 +/- 18 mg [Group 2]; P < 0.01). The incidence of more profound motor block was more frequent in Group 2 (P < 0.05). Although there was a trend for more women receiving clonidine to require ephedrine for treatment of hypotension, this did not seem to have an impact on fetal outcome or incidence of cesarean deliveries for nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracings. This study demonstrates the dose-sparing effect of clonidine when added to ropivacaine. IMPLICATIONS: The effect of adding 75 microg of clonidine to ropivacaine for epidural labor analgesia was studied. Clonidine increased analgesia duration and produced dose sparing compared with ropivacaine alone. Despite a tendency for hypotension in women receiving clonidine, there was no apparent effect on delivery mode or neonatal outcome.     

Epidural administration of neostigmine and clonidine to induce labor analgesia: evaluation of efficacy and local anesthetic-sparing effect

BACKGROUND: Epidural clonidine produces analgesia without motor impairment, and is associated with a local anesthetic-sparing effect during labor. The authors have recently demonstrated that epidural neostigmine initiates selective labor analgesia devoid of adverse effects. Both drugs possess common analgesic mechanisms mediated through spinal acetylcholine release. This study evaluates their epidural combination in parturients. METHODS: At the beginning of labor, parturients were randomly allocated to one of five groups to receive one of the following after a test dose: 150 microg epidural clonidine, 750 microg neostigmine, or 75 microg clonidine combined with 250, 500, or 750 microg neostigmine. A pain score (visual analog scale, 0-100) was recorded before administration and at regular intervals until request for a supplemental injection. Subsequent analgesia was provided by continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine. RESULTS: Parturients did not differ regarding demographic data and initial pain score. Clonidine 150 microg , neostigmine 750 microg , and 75 microg clonidine plus 250 microg neostigmine produced ineffective and short-lasting effects. Clonidine 75 microg plus 500 microg neostigmine and 75 microg clonidine plus 750 microg neostigmine presented comparable durations of 90 +/- 32 and 108 +/- 38 min (mean +/- SD), respectively, and final analgesic efficacies, with 72.2% and 84%, respectively, of the parturients reporting a visual analog scale score of less than 30 out of 100 after 30 min. Ropivacaine use was significantly reduced in all clonidine groups (average, 9.5 mg/h) in comparison with neostigmine alone (17 +/- 3 mg/h). No adverse effects were observed for 75 mug clonidine combined with any dose of neostigmine while maternal sedation (20%) and hypotension (33%) occurred with 150 microg clonidine alone. CONCLUSIONS: Epidural clonidine, 75 microg , with 750 microg neostigmine is an effective combination to initiate selective labor analgesia without adverse effects. Clonidine use further reduces local anesthetic consumption throughout the course of labor.     

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus continuous epidural infusion with ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia in children

Epidural ropivacaine infusion has been used in children; however, patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) has not been evaluated in the pediatric population. In this study, we compared the clinical efficiency of PCEA and of continuous epidural infusion analgesia (CEA) in children. Forty-eight children undergoing orthopedic surgery were randomized to receive PCEA or CEA with ropivacaine 0.2%. All patients underwent a standard general anesthetic. Children also received ketoprofen and propacetamol. Pain scores and side effects were recorded for 48 h. If the visual analog score scale score was >4 of 10, analgesia was considered inadequate, and rescue treatment was administered. Both groups obtained effective pain relief. Children in the PCEA group received significantly less local anesthetic than those in the CEA group (0.20 +/- 0.08 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1) versus 0.40 +/- 0.08 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1); P < 0.001). Motor effects, supplemental analgesic requirements, and side effects did not differ. We concluded that PCEA with ropivacaine 0.2% can provide adequate postoperative analgesia for pediatric orthopedic procedures with smaller dose requirements than CEA. IMPLICATIONS: We studied patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and continuous epidural infusion analgesia (CEA) with 0.2% ropivacaine during the postoperative period in children. We found that either PCEA or CEA with plain ropivacaine 0.2% provided adequate pain relief in children during the first 48-h postoperative course. However, adequate analgesia was obtained with 50% less volume infused with PCEA compared with CEA.     

Epidural combination of ropivacaine with sufentanil for postoperative analgesia after total knee replacement: a pilot study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We assessed the analgesic efficacy of postoperative epidural infusions of ropivacaine 0.1 and 0.2% combined with sufentanil 1 microg mL(-1) in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. METHODS: Twenty-two ASA I-III patients undergoing elective total-knee replacement were included. Lumbar epidural blockade using ropivacaine 0.75% was combined with either propofol sedation or general anaesthesia for surgery. After surgery, the epidural infusion was commenced. Eleven patients in each group received either an epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.1% with 1 microg mL(-1) sufentanil (Group 1) or ropivacaine 0.2% with 1 microg mL(-1) sufentanil (Group 2) at a rate of 5-9 mL h(-1). All patients had access to intravenous pirinatrimide (piritramide) via a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. RESULTS: Motor block was negligible for the study duration in both groups. There was no significant difference with the 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, with the consumption of rescue analgesia or with patient satisfaction. Patients in Group 1 experienced significantly less nausea (P < 0.05) than those in Group 2. Both treatment regimens provided effective postoperative analgesia with only a minimal use of supplemental opioid PCA. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the use of ropivacaine 0.1% with 1 microg mL(-1) sufentanil for postoperative analgesia after total knee replacement as it provides efficient pain relief with no motor block of the lower limbs. In addition, compared with 0.2% ropivacaine with sufentanil, the mixture reduces local anaesthetic consumption without compromise in patient satisfaction or VAS scores. Patients even experience less nausea.     

Ropivacaine-clonidine combination for caudal blockade in children

BACKGROUND: Adding clonidine to weak ropivacaine solutions (<0.2%) could potentially enhance analgesia as well as further reduce the risk for unwanted motor blockade. The aim of the present study was to compare the postoperative pain-relieving quality of a ropivacaine 0.1%-clonidine mixture to that of plain ropivacaine 0.2% following caudal administration in children. METHODS: In a prospective, observer-blinded fashion, 40 ASA 1 paediatric patients undergoing subumbilical surgery were randomly allocated to receive a caudal injection of either plain ropivacaine 0.2% (1 ml/kg) (R0.2) or a mixture of ropivacaine 0.1% with clonidine 2 microg/kg (1 ml/kg) (R0.1C). Objective pain scale score and need for supplemental analgesia were used to evaluate analgesia during the first 24 h postoperatively. Residual postoperative sedation was also assessed. RESULTS: A significantly higher number of patients in the R0.1C group (18/20) could be managed without supplemental analgesia during the first 24 h postoperatively compared to the R0.2 group (11/20) (P=0.034). Both the degree and the duration of postoperative sedation was similar in both groups. No signs of postoperative motor blockade were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of clonidine (2 microg/kg) and ropivacaine 0.1% is associated with an improved quality of postoperative analgesia compared to plain 0.2% ropivacaine. The improved analgesic quality of the clonidine-ropivacaine mixture is achieved without causing any significant degree of postoperative sedation.     

A long-term continuous infusion via a sciatic catheter in a 3-year-old boy

We describe the case of a 3-year-old boy with a subtotal amputation of the right foot who received treatment for pain via a peripheral catheter positioned at the level of the sciatic nerve (lateral approach).We administered a continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine, 0.4 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1) plus clonidine 0.12 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1) for 21 days. Pain relief was complete and the patient did not require any further rescue analgesia throughout the period even during medications and surgical treatment in our intensive care unit. We discuss the safety and efficacy of the use of a peripheral continuous infusion in children compared with other techniques of analgesia.     

Pre-incisional epidural ropivacaine, sufentanil, clonidine, and (S)+-ketamine does not provide pre-emptive analgesia in patients undergoing major pancreatic surgery

BACKGROUND: The concept of pre-emptive analgesia remains controversial. This prospective, randomized, and double-blind study compared epidural administration of ropivacaine 2 mg ml(-1), sufentanil 0.5 microg ml(-1), clonidine 3 microg ml(-1), and S(+)-ketamine 0.25 mg ml(-1) (study solution) given before incision with the same combination started at the end of the operation. METHODS: After testing the stability of the solution using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and examining 12 patients for possible side-effects in comparison with the epidural infusion of ropivacaine 2 mg ml(-1) and sufentanil 0.5 microg ml(-1), 30 patients undergoing major pancreatic surgery were recruited into the study. Before induction of anaesthesia, an epidural catheter was inserted (TH6-8). Patients in Group 1 received a bolus of 8 ml followed by a continuous infusion (8 ml h(-1)) of the study solution before induction of anaesthesia. In Group 2, patients received the same volume of saline before operation, the study solution was started at the end of surgery. After operation, the infusion was maintained for at least 96 h using a patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) pump in both groups. Patients were evaluated up to the seventh postoperative day for pain and side-effects. RESULTS: Visual analogue scale (VAS) values at rest were as follows: G1 vs G2: 24 h, 19 (sd 23) vs 6 (13); 48 h, 4 (10) vs 11 (21); and 72 h, 12 (22) vs 13 (21). VAS values during coughing and mobilization were also comparable. Total volume of epidural infusion was 904 (114) ml in G1 vs 892 (154) ml in G2. The incidence of side-effects (nausea, vomiting, and motor block) was low and not different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-incisional epidural analgesic infusion did not provide pre-emptive analgesia compared with administration started at the end of surgery, but both groups had low pain scores.     

Improved analgesia with clonidine when added to local anesthetic during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for hip arthroplasty: a double-blind, randomized and placebo-controlled study

Background: The perioperative effects of intrathecal and epidural clonidine combined with local anesthetic were evaluated in 60 patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. Methods: This was a double‐blinded study and the patients were randomized into three groups, with 20 patients in each group. All patients received spinal anesthesia with 17.5 mg of plain bupivacaine with 15 µg of clonidine (Group BC‐RC) or without clonidine (Groups B‐R and B‐RC). Postoperatively, epidural infusion was administered in the following way: Group B‐R – ropivacaine 4 mg h^?1; Groups B‐RC and BC‐RC: ropivacaine 4 mg h^?1 and clonidine 40 µg h^?1. Sensory block was assessed with light touch, pinprick, transcutaneous electrical stimulation at T12 and L2 dermatomes, and perception of thermal stimuli. Results: The maximal upper level of sensory block measured by pin‐prick (T6–T7) did not differ between the groups while the partial sensory block for cold and warmth were increased two dermatomes above pin‐prick level in the group with intrathecal clonidine compared to the other two groups (P < 0.05). Duration of anesthesia, analgesia and motor block were longer in Group BC‐RC compared to Groups B‐R and B‐RC (P < 0.02). Postoperatively, both VAS score on movement and PCA‐morphine consumption were higher in Group B‐R than in Groups B‐RC and BC‐RC (P < 0.01). The arterial pressure and heart rate in Groups B‐RC and BC‐RC were significantly lower than in Group B‐R at 10–24 and 15–24 h, respectively, after spinal injection. Conclusion: Low‐dose intrathecal clonidine provided a better quality of anesthesia and longer‐lasting analgesia. Epidural clonidine‐ropivacaine infusion resulted in improved postoperative analgesia but was associated with a moderate decrease in blood pressure.     

How to prolong postoperative analgesia after caudal anaesthesia with ropivacaine in children: S-ketamine versus clonidine

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to determine whether caudal S-ketamine or clonidine prolonged analgesia together with ropivacaine. METHODS: Sixty-three boys, aged 1-5 years, who were undergoing minor surgery, were allocated in order to receive one of three solutions for caudal anaesthesia. Group R received 2 mg x kg(-1) 0.2% ropivacaine; group C, 2 mg x kg(-1) 0.2% ropivacaine + clonidine 2 microg x kg(-1); and group K, 2 mg x kg(-1) 0.2% ropivacaine + S-ketamine 0.5 mg x kg(-1). RESULTS: Postoperative analgesia assessed by CHEOPS lasted 701 min in group K (P < 0.05) compared with 492 min in group C and 291 min in group R. There were no significant differences between the groups for incidence of haemodynamic and respiratory alterations, motor block or sedation. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that S-ketamine 0.5 mg x kg(-1) when added to 0.2% caudal ropivacaine provides better postoperative analgesia than clonidine without any clinically significant side-effect.     

Adding clonidine to the induction bolus and postoperative infusion during continuous femoral nerve block delays recovery of motor function after total knee arthroplasty

We evaluated the effects of adding clonidine for continuous peripheral nerve infusions. Sixty patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty under combined single-injection sciatic block and continuous femoral infusion were randomly allocated to three groups: block induction with 0.75% ropivacaine followed by 0.2% ropivacaine (group control; n = 20); block induction with 0.75% ropivacaine and 1 microg/kg clonidine followed by 0.2% ropivacaine (group cloni-bolus; n = 20), and block induction with 0.75% ropivacaine and 1 microg/kg clonidine followed by 0.2% ropivacaine with 1 microg/mL clonidine (group cloni-infusion; n = 20). After surgery, continuous femoral infusion was provided with a patient-controlled infusion pump (basal infusion rate, 6 mL/h; incremental dose, 2 mL; lockout time, 15 min). The median (range) onset time of surgical block was 15 min (5-30 min) in group control, 10 min (5-35 min) in group cloni-bolus, and 10 min (5-30 min) in group cloni-infusion (P = 0.07). No differences were reported among groups in the degree of pain measured with the visual analog scale. The total consumption of local anesthetic solution after a 24-h infusion was 170 mL (144-220 mL) in group control, 169 mL (144-260 mL) in group cloni-bolus, and 164 mL (144-248 mL) in group cloni-infusion (P = 0.51); after the second day of infusion, total consumption was 168 mL (144-200 mL) in group control, 156 mL (144-288 mL) in group cloni-bolus, and 150 mL (144-210 mL) in group cloni-infusion (P = 0.48). Hemodynamic profiles and sedation were similar in the three groups. Motor function impairment after 48 h of infusion was observed in 27% of cloni-infusion patients but in only 6% of both the control and cloni-bolus groups (P = 0.05). We conclude that adding clonidine 1 microg/mL to local anesthetic for continuous femoral nerve block does not improve the quality of pain relief but has the potential for delaying recovery of motor function.     

The continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.1% with 0.5 μg·mL−1 sufentanil provides effective postoperative analgesia after total hip replacement: a pilot study

PURPOSE: To assess the analgesic efficacy and functional outcome of postoperative epidural infusion of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil in a randomized, controlled trial. METHODS: Thirty-two ASA I-III patients undergoing elective total hip replacement (THR) were included. Lumbar epidural block using 0.75% ropivacaine was combined with either propofol sedation or general anesthesia for surgery. On arrival in the recovery room, the epidural infusion was commenced at a rate in mL calculated as follows: (height in cm - 100) x 0.1. Eleven patients received an epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.1% with 0.5 microg x mL(-1) sufentanil (Group R+S0.5), ten patients ropivacaine 0.1% with 0.75 microg x mL(-1) sufentanil (Group R+S0.75), and 11 patients ropivacaine 0.1% with 1 microg x mL(-1) sufentanil (Group R+S1) over a postoperative study period of 44 hr. All patients had access to iv piritramide via a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. Postel-Merle-d'Aubigné scoring system (PMA score) was assessed preoperatively, three weeks after surgery, and three months after surgery by an orthopedic surgeon blinded to study group. RESULTS: Motor block was negligible in all three groups. After eight hours of epidural infusion, sensory block had regressed completely in all patients. There was no significant difference with regard to visual analogue scale (VAS) scores (at rest: P = 0.55, on movement: P = 0.63), consumption of rescue medication (P = 0.99), patient satisfaction (P = 0.22), and the incidence of adverse events. All treatment regimens provided effective postoperative analgesia with only a minimal use of supplemental opioid PCA. There was no difference between groups regarding orthopedic PMA score (pain: P = 0.24, mobility: P = 0.65, and ability to walk: P = 0.44). CONCLUSION: Ropivacaine 0.1% with 0.5 microg x mL(-1) sufentanil for postoperative analgesia after THR provides efficient pain relief and, compared with 0.75 and 1 microg x mL(-1) sufentanil, reduces sufentanil consumption without compromise in patient satisfaction, VAS scores, and functional outcome.     

The effect of hypernatremia on liver allografts in rats

We performed a prospective randomized double-blinded study to test preservative-free S(+)-ketamine alone or in combination with clonidine for intra- and postoperative caudal blockade in pediatric surgery over a 24-h period. Fifty-three children (1-72 mo) scheduled for inguinal hernia repair were caudally injected with either S(+)-ketamine 1 mg/kg alone (Group K) or with additional clonidine (Group C1 = 1 microg/kg; Group C2 = 2 microg/kg) during sevoflurane anesthesia via a laryngeal mask. Intraoperative monitoring included heart rate, blood pressure, and pulse oximetry; postoperative monitoring included a pain discomfort scale and a sedation score. No additional analgesic drugs were required during surgery. The mean duration of postoperative analgesia was 13.3 +/- 9.2 h in Group K, 22.7 +/- 3.5 h in Group C1, and 21.8 +/- 5.2 h in Group C2 (P < 0.0001, Group K versus other groups). Groups C1 and C2 received significantly fewer analgesics in the postoperative period than Group K (15% and 18% vs 63%; P < 0.01). The three groups had similar postoperative sedation scores. We conclude that the combination of S(+)-ketamine 1 mg/kg with clonidine 1 or 2 microg/kg for caudal blockade in children provides excellent analgesia without side effects over a 24-h period. IMPLICATIONS: Caudally administered preservative-free S(+)-ketamine combined with 1 or 2 microg/kg clonidine provides excellent perioperative analgesia in children and has minimal side effects.     

Caudal analgesia in children: S(+)-ketamine vs S(+)-ketamine plus clonidine

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate postoperative analgesia provided by caudal S(+)-ketamine and S(+)-ketamine plus clonidine without local anesthetic. METHODS: Forty-four children aged 1-5 years consecutively scheduled for inguinal hernia repair, hydrocele repair or orchidopexy were randomly assigned to receive a caudal injection of either S(+)-ketamine 1 mg x kg(-1) (group K) or S(+)-ketamine 0.5 mg x kg(-1) plus clonidine 1 microg x kg(-1) (group KC). Postoperative analgesia and sedation were evaluated by CHEOPS and Ramsay scale from emergence from general anesthesia for 24 h. RESULTS: No statistical difference was observed between study groups with respect to pain and sedation assessment. A slight trend toward a reduced requirement for rescue analgesia in group KC was observed, although not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Caudal S(+)-ketamine 1 mg x kg(-1) and S(+)-ketamine 0.5 mg x kg(-1) plus clonidine 1 microg x kg(-1) are safe and provide effective postoperative analgesia in children without adverse effects.     

Epidural Administration of Neostigmine and Clonidine to Induce Labor Analgesia: Evaluation of Efficacy and Local Anesthetic-sparing Effect

Background: Epidural clonidine produces analgesia without motor impairment, and is associated with a local anesthetic-sparing effect during labor. The authors have recently demonstrated that epidural neostigmine initiates selective labor analgesia devoid of adverse effects. Both drugs possess common analgesic mechanisms mediated through spinal acetylcholine release. This study evaluates their epidural combination in parturients.

Methods: At the beginning of labor, parturients were randomly allocated to one of five groups to receive one of the following after a test dose: 150 [mu]g epidural clonidine, 750 [mu]g neostigmine, or 75 [mu]g clonidine combined with 250, 500, or 750 [mu]g neostigmine. A pain score (visual analog scale, 0-100) was recorded before administration and at regular intervals until request for a supplemental injection. Subsequent analgesia was provided by continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine.

Results: Parturients did not differ regarding demographic data and initial pain score. Clonidine 150 [mu]g, neostigmine 750 [mu]g, and 75 [mu]g clonidine plus 250 [mu]g neostigmine produced ineffective and short-lasting effects. Clonidine 75 [mu]g plus 500 [mu]g neostigmine and 75 [mu]g clonidine plus 750 [mu]g neostigmine presented comparable durations of 90 +/- 32 and 108 +/- 38 min (mean +/- SD), respectively, and final analgesic efficacies, with 72.2% and 84%, respectively, of the parturients reporting a visual analog scale score of less than 30 out of 100 after 30 min. Ropivacaine use was significantly reduced in all clonidine groups (average, 9.5 mg/h) in comparison with neostigmine alone (17 +/- 3 mg/h). No adverse effects were observed for 75 [mu]g clonidine combined with any dose of neostigmine while maternal sedation (20%) and hypotension (33%) occurred with 150 [mu]g clonidine alone.     

Comparison of continuous background infusion plus demand dose and demand-only parturient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) using ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for labor and delivery

BACKGROUND: Using ropivacaine combined with sufentanil, we determined the analgesic efficacy of parturient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with or without (demand-only PCEA) continuous background infusion in reducing labor pain in 66 parturients. METHODS: After placement of the epidural catheter and administration of an initial bolus containing ropivacaine 16 mg and sufentanil 10 microg, parturients were prospectively randomized into two groups. The PCEA solution consisted of ropivacaine 0.16% plus sufentanil 0.5 microg/mL. Parturients with PCEA plus continuous background infusion received 4 mL/h plus an hourly maximum of three 4-mL boluses on demand (lock-out time 20 min); parturients with demand-only PCEA received an hourly maximum of four 4-mL boluses (lock-out time 15 min) of anesthetic solution. Pain scores (VAS 0-100 mm), drug doses administered, duration of labor, sensory and motor epidural block characteristics, maternal satisfaction, neonatal outcome and adverse events were determined. RESULTS: Both regimens provided excellent parturients' satisfaction and pain relief. However, periods of VAS scores>40 mm during all stages of labor were significantly more frequent in parturients receiving demand-only PCEA (22.4%) compared to parturients receiving PCEA plus continuous background infusion (7.5%, P=0.0011). Drug doses administered, duration of PCEA, labor and delivery, epidural block characteristics, neonatal outcome and adverse events did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Under the conditions of the study, PCEA plus continuous background infusion was more effective than demand-only PCEA in treating labor pain without increasing consumption of anesthetic solution.     

The effect of clonidine on the minimum local analgesic concentration of epidural ropivacaine during labor

On the basis of the determination of minimum local analgesic concentration (MLAC), ropivacaine has been demonstrated to be less potent than bupivacaine during the first stage of labor. In this study we assessed the effect of clonidine on the MLAC of ropivacaine. Seventy-seven parturients of mixed parity requesting epidural analgesia for labor (cervical dilation, 3-7 cm) were included in the study. They received an epidural bolus of either ropivacaine (n = 30), ropivacaine plus clonidine 30 microg (n = 28), or ropivacaine plus clonidine 60 microg (n = 19) in the second part of the study. The concentration of the ropivacaine solution was determined by the response of the previous parturient in that group by using an up-down sequential allocation. A visual analog pain score of < or =10 mm within 30 min after the epidural bolus (20 mL) was considered an effective response. An effective result directed a 0.01% wt/vol decrement for the next patient. An ineffective result directed a 0.01% wt/vol increment. The MLAC of ropivacaine was 0.097% wt/vol (95% confidence interval, 0.085%-0.108%). It was unaffected by a 30-microg dose of epidural clonidine (0.081% [0.045%-0.117%]) but was significantly decreased by a 60-microg clonidine dose (0.035% [0.024%-0.046%]) (P < 0.001). This study documents a decrease in the MLAC of ropivacaine by clonidine, significant for a 60- microg dose. IMPLICATIONS: Epidural ropivacaine potency in labor can be increased by the addition of epidural clonidine. This study demonstrates that 60 microg of epidural clonidine significantly decreases the minimum local analgesic concentration of ropivacaine during the first stage of labor but is associated with sedation.     

Fentanyl and clonidine as adjunctive analgesics with levobupivacaine in paravertebral analgesia for breast surgery

The addition of fentanyl or clonidine to levobupivacaine was evaluated in patients undergoing breast surgery under general anaesthesia with intra- and postoperative paravertebral analgesia. Patients were randomly allocated to four groups: Group L received 19 ml bolus levobupivacaine 0.25% plus 1 ml saline followed by an infusion of levobupivacaine 0.1%; Group LF received 19 ml bolus levobupivacaine 0.25% plus fentanyl 50 microg followed by an infusion of levobupivacaine 0.05% with fentanyl 4 microg x ml(-1); Group LC received 19 ml bolus levobupivacaine 0.25% plus clonidine 150 microg followed by an infusion of levobupivacaine 0.05% with clonidine 3 microg x ml(-1); Group C (control) received general anaesthesia without paravertebral analgesia. All groups received postoperative i.v. morphine patient controlled analgesia (PCA). Although mean (SD) postoperative PCA morphine consumption was decreased in LF [7.9 (4.1) mg] and LC [5.9 (3.5) mg]vs L [27.7 (8.6) mg] or C patients [21.7 (5.5) mg], p < 0.01, paravertebral fentanyl and clonidine were associated with significantly increased vomiting and hypotension, respectively.     

Pre- and intraoperative epidural ropivacaine have no early preemptive analgesic effect in major gynecological tumour surgery

PURPOSE: Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is an established technique for postoperative pain relief after major abdominal surgery. However it is still under discussion whether pre-incisional TEA can reduce postoperative pain perception or postoperative analgesic consumption. METHODS: The present prospective, randomized, double-blind study was performed to investigate the effects of intra- and postoperative TEA vs only postoperative TEA using ropivacaine 0.375% in 30 women scheduled for major abdominal tumour surgery. Prior to induction of general anesthesia patients received an epidural bolus of 10 mL saline in Group I (GI) and 10 mL ropivacaine 0.375% in Group II (GII) followed by an infusion of 6 mL x hr(-1) of the respective solution during surgery. Postoperatively all patients received an epidural infusion of 6 mL x hr(-1) ropivacaine 0.375% during 24 hr followed by patient controlled epidural analgesia for the next 72 hr. Operative data, dynamic pain scores, consumption of local anesthetics and standardized supplemental analgesics were analyzed. RESULTS: No difference was seen between groups with respect to the amount of required postoperative local anesthetics and supplemental analgesics, pain scores and side effects during the first 96 hr following surgery except a reduction of intraoperative sufentanil consumption (GI: 143.2 +/- 52.6 vs GII: 73.3 +/- 32.6 microg, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative TEA with ropivacaine 0.375% did not significantly reduce the amount of analgesics required after major abdominal gynecological tumour surgery.