Infections in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Patients

Implantable cardioverter de;fibrillators fICDsj have been documented as an effective modality in reducing arrhythmic mortality. A serious complication associated with implantation of the device is infection. Few studies have addressed this issue. Two hundred seven patients with refractory ventricular arrhythmias underwent 207 ICD implantations, and 56 subcutaneous generator changes at our institution. Eight patients developed wound infections, four following ICD implantation (4 out of 207 or 1.9%), and four following a generator change (4 out of 56 or 7.1%). Wound cultures most commonly revealed Staphylococcus aurous and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Infections treated with antibiotics alone, or with only generator removal, frequently recurred (four out of five attempts). There were no recurrences following total patch/lead and generator system removal. In jive patients, the same generator unit was successfully emplaned following ethylene oxide sterilization without infection recurrence. We conclude that treatment of device-associated infection generally requires total generator and patch/lead system removal, and that generator units can be successfully reimplanted yielding substantial cost savings.     

AutoCapture with Dual-Coil Leads of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

AutoCapture™ (AC) can confirm ventricular capture with true bipolar single coil leads of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD). The compatibility of AC with a new, true bipolar, dual-coil ICD lead needed to be evaluated. This multicenter study enrolled 46 patients (69 ± 10 years, 37 men) undergoing ICD implantation. All patients received a true bipolar, dual-coil lead. Evoked response (ER) sensitivity and AC threshold tests were performed using a pulse generator with the AC algorithm. Mean capture threshold was 0.85 ± 0.67 V, pacing impedance 612 ± 225 Ω, R wave amplitude 13.85 ± 6.17 mV, and defibrillation threshold 14.4 ± 5.1 J. AC was recommended in 45 patients (97.8%) with ER and polarization values of 14.86 ± 7.32 mV and 0.87 ± 0.69 mV, respectively. The AC algorithm was highly compatible with true bipolar, dual-coil ICD leads. An AC algorithm specifically designed for an ICD may improve the generator longevity. Further examination of AC compatibility with other leads is warranted.     

Modified Magnet Test for a Reversed Automatic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

We present the case of a 55-year-old man with atrial septal defect and cardiomyopathy who underwent implantation of an automatic cardioverter defibrillator (AICD) for ventricular tachycardia resulting in collapse. This case demonstrates multiple unusual complications related to AICD, including rotation of the pulse generator unit about its long axis requiring a "left-handed" magnet test to determine the appropriate counts.     

Automatic Implantable Cardioverter/ Defibrillator (AICD) and Antitachycardia Pacemaker (Tachylog): Combined use in Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias

Antitachycardia pacing in ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VT) is associated with potential acceleration of VT: frequency of VT and discomfort of the patient (pt) can limit treatment with the AICD. We therefore evaluated the combined use of antitachycardia pacing and AICD in 6 of 14 patients (age 50–70. mean 60 years) with AICD implantation because of VT, which could he terminated by temporary overdrive pacing. With the interactive mode of the Tachylog, termination of VT by the pacemaker as well as by the AICD was assessed after implantation. In the automatic mode, the Tachylog functioned as a bipolar VVI device with antitachycardia burst stimulation: 2–5 stimuli, interval 260–300 ms. 1–2 interventions. During follow-up of 12±5 months, the Tachylog terminated VT reliably 20 to 327 times per patient. In three patients, burst stimulation accelerated VT, which was terminated then by the AICD discharge. Conclusion: Drug resistant ventricular tachyarrhythmias can be terminated by the Tachylog pacemaker avoiding patients' discomfort. In case of acceleration. ventricular tachyarrhythmias can be controlled by the automatic implantable cardioverter/defibrillator. A universal pacemaker should combine antitachycardia pacing with back-up defibrillation mode.     

Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Proarrhythmia: Case Report and Review of the Literature

A 31-year-old man who received an automatic cardioverter defibrillator subsequently underwent exercise testing. During exercise, a sinus tachycardia resulted above his device detect rate prompting two shocks, the second of which produced an unstable polymorphous ventricular tachycardia. In this article, we review the literature on automatic cardioverter defibrillator-induced ventricular tachyarrhythmias as well as the management of exercise testing in patients with these devices.     

Infection of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Systems: A Preventable Complication?

In a consecutive series of 164 patients undergoing primary implantation of an impJantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), two patients died in the hospital (1.2%) and early system infection developed in one patient requiring expJantation of the device (0.61%). Late infection developed in one additional patient (0.61%) 7 months after transvenous ICD implantation, and was thought to be due to a recent intravascular catheterization. Symptomatic generator pocket hematomas developed in three patients, two of which were treated by simple evacuation and one with temporary generator explantation and subsequent reimplantation of the unit in a new pocket. No infection developed in these three patients during follow-up. Generator erosion without obvious system infection developed in a fourth patient. Guidelines for the prevention of infection in ICD systems are presented.     

Use of a Wireless Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in a Patient with a Preexisting Neurostimulator

We report the case of a 54-year-old man with a previously implanted neurostimulator who presented with palpitations and was found to have sustained ventricular tachycardia on electrophysiologic study. A Medtronic wireless implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD; Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) with home monitoring (HM) was successfully implanted. Interaction testing during implantation, follow-up, and HM showed that there was no device-device interaction.     

Combination of Antitachycardia Pacemaker and Automatic Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator for Ventricular Tachycardia

Antitachycardia pacing for ventricular tachycardia (VT) is associated with the possibility of fibrillating the heart; on the other hand, the frequency of VT and patient discomfort can limit treatment with the automatic implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (AICD). To contribute to the further development of a universal pacemaker, we evaluated the combined use of the antitachycardia pacemaker ("tachylog") and the AICD in five patients with recurrent VT. In the automatic mode, the "tachylog" worked as a bipolar VVI pacemaker. For antitachycardia pacing, a burst of rapid ventricular pacing was delivered at about 80% of the cycle length. During a follow-up period of 5 +/- 2 months (range, 3 to 8) two to 291 successful interventions of antitachycardia pacing were counted from diagnostic data which had been collected by the pulse generator during the course of treatment. When the antitachycardia pacemaker failed to terminate VT, the AICD was activated. In the individual case, between 0 and 41 discharges of the AICD were delivered. The high pulse energy of the AICD did not damage the antitachycardia pacemaker; no interference of the two devices was observed. Future antitachycardia systems should be more flexible with regard to detection and termination modes, combining antitachycardia pacing with back-up defibrillation.     

Multiple Inappropriate Shocks Precipitated by Interrogation of an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

A 57-year-old man suffered multiple inappropriate shocks from an implantable cardioverter defibrillator that could not be inactivated because the magnet switch feature was deactivated. Attempts to interrogate the defibrillator caused shocks to be delivered. Emergent explantation was performed and a loose sensing lead was discovered. Sensing and defibrillation leads functioned normally, and testing of the explanted generator demonstrated no abnormalities. A new generator was put in place and the patient has been without shocks for 6 months. This case illustrates the need for robust methods of attenuating electromagnetic interference and the importance of multiple methods of device inactivation.     

Termination of Electrocution‐Induced Ventricular Fibrillation by an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

We describe a case in which an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) saved a patient's life after he tried to commit suicide by electrocuting himself. Deaths caused by electrocution are usually accidental and rarely suicidal. The amount of current flow is the most important factor in deciding the degree of electrical injury, which may range from transient muscle tremors to death. The ICD is electrically insulated from surrounding electromagnetic interference and the passage of electric current typically does not damage or reprogram the device. In our patient, electromagnetic interference caused by the electric current initially triggered the noise reversion mode, leading to asynchronous pacing. Ventricular fibrillation was detected and terminated only after the electromagnetic interference stopped, as depicted by the intracardiac electrogram. This case is the first documented example of an ICD‐aborted fatal electrocution from ventricular fibrillation caused by an unnatural electrical source. (PACE 2010; 510–512)     

The Use and Interaction of Permanent Pacemakers and the Automatic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

The adverse interactions of permanent pacemakers and automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillators (AICD) were studied in nine patients in whom both devices were implanted. Both unipolar and bipolar pacemakers were evaluated. The permanent pacemakers were also used to do noninvasive electrophysiological studies and to induce ventricular fibrillation. Undersensing of ventricular fibrillation by the permanent pacemakers caused inappropriate pacemaker stimuli, which caused undersensing of ventricular fibrillation by the AICD in three of four patients with unipolar pacemakers. After an AICD discharge, pacemaker noncapture was seen in eight of 22 episodes for an average 4.9 seconds and inability to sense was seen in 11 of 20 episodes for an average 9.0 seconds. Counting of pacemaker stimuli and QRS by the AICD caused inappropriate discharges. Noninvasive electrophysiological testing by the pacemakers correlated with invasive testing. Furthermore, induction of ventricular fibrillation was successful in four of five patients attempted, though requiring long bursts at high outputs at the shortest cycle lengths obtainable by these pacemakers. Operation of the AICD and permanent pacemakers must be clearly understood to avoid adverse interactions of these devices.     

The Value of DDD Pacing in Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

Although the beneficial effects of DDD pacing are well known, currently available ICDs provide only fixed rate ventricular antibradycardia pacing. In a consecutive series of 139 patients with ICDs, we have analyzed the need for antibradycardia pacing and the indications for DDD pacing. We also report our initial experience with the Defender 9001 (ELA Medical, France) DDD-ICD. Out of 139 patients, 25 (18%) were in need of antibradycardia pacing. Ten patients already had a pacemaker at the time of ICD implantation and ten other patients had a conventional pacemaker indication at that time. Five patients became pacemaker dependent during a follow-up of 20 ± 8 months. The disorders necessitating pacemaker therapy were high degree AV conduction disturbances in 72%, sick sinus syndrome in 12%, and AF with a slow ventricular response in 16% of patients. Based upon current indications, DDD pacing was indicated in 20 (80%) of 25 patients. The Defender 9001 DDD-ICD (ELA Medical) was used in two patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and pacemaker syndrome with VVI pacing. Cardiac output during DDD pacing increased by 36% in one patient with an increase in VO₂ max during exercise of 29%. The other patient showed an increase in cardiac output of 50% with DDD pacing, and, while unable to exercise with VVI pacing, had a VO_2max of 24 mL/kg per minute during DDD pacing. Up to 18% of our ICD patients are in need of antibradycardia pacing. Of these pacemaker dependent patients, 80% have an indication for DDD pacing. Our first clinical experience with a DDD-ICD confirms the hemodynamic benefit of AV synchronous pacing in ICD patients with pacemaker syndrome.