A phase II trial of combination of CPT-11 and cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. CPT-11 Lung Cancer Study Group.

A phase I trial of the combination of irinotecan (CPT-11) with cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) showed a very promising response rate of 54% in previously untreated NSCLC patients. This study was conducted to confirm the activity and toxicities of CPT-11 and cisplatin combination for previously untreated NSCLC in a multi-institutional phase II study. Seventy patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC received CPT-11 60 mg m(-2) intravenously (i.v.) on days 1, 8 and 15, and cisplatin 80 mg m(-2) (i.v.) on day 1 every 4 weeks. Assessments were made of response, survival and toxicities. Sixty-nine were eligible, and evaluable for toxicities and survival, and 64 patients evaluable for response. Thirty-three patients (52%; 95% confidence interval 39-64%) achieved an objective response, with one complete response (2%) and 32 partial responses (50%). The median duration of response was 19 weeks and the overall median survival time was 44 weeks. The 1-year survival rate was 33%. The major toxic effects were leucopenia and diarrhoea. Grade 3 or 4 leucopenia, neutropenia, and diarrhoea occurred in 32 patients (46%), 53 patients (80%), and 13 patients (19%) respectively. A combination of CPT-11 and cisplatin is very effective against non-small-cell lung cancer with acceptable toxicities.     

Randomized, multicenter, open-label phase II study of gemcitabine plus single-dose versus split-dose carboplatin in the treatment of patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine/carboplatin is a convenient and effective treatment for advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but modification of the schedule to diminish thrombocytopenia is worthwhile. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-eight chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were randomized from 15 centers in Germany to receive gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 plus carboplatin area under the curve 5 on day 1 (arm A) or carboplatin area under the curve 2.5 on days 1 and 8 (arm B), every 21 days for 4 cycles. RESULTS: The 2 arms (A vs. B) were well balanced with regard to patient baseline characteristics: stage IV 72.5% versus 69%, median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 1 versus 1. The incidence of grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was as follows (percentage of patients in arm A vs. B): leukopenia 37.5% versus 27% (P = 0.075), granulocytopenia 36% versus 36%, and thrombocytopenia 51% versus 35% (P = 0.017). Nonhematologic toxicity was modest and comparable with both schedules. The overall response rate was 46% versus 36% (P = 0.12), and 24% versus 42% had stable disease. Median progression-free survival (5.8 months vs. 6.1 months) and overall survival (11.7 months vs. 10.7 months) were not significantly different between arms A and B. CONCLUSION: Splitting the dose of carboplatin between days 1 and 8 on the same days as gemcitabine results in a significantly decreased incidence of severe thrombocytopenia, without compromising the activity of the combination.     

Randomised phase III trial of irinotecan combined with cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

To determine a standard combination chemotherapy for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we conducted a phase III trial of irinotecan (CPT-11) to test the hypotheses that CPT-11+cisplatin is superior to cisplatin+vindesine and that CPT-11 monotherapy is not inferior to cisplatin+vindesine. A total of 398 patients with previously untreated NSCLC were randomised to receive cisplatin+CPT-11 (CPT-P), cisplatin+vindesine (VDS-P) or CPT-11 alone (CPT). In the CPT-P arm, CPT-11 60 mg m(-2) was administered on days 1, 8 and 15, and cisplatin 80 mg m(-2) was administered on day 1. In the VDS-P arm, cisplatin 80 mg m(-2) was administered on day 1, and vindesine 3 mg m(-2) was administered on days 1, 8 and 15. In the CPT arm, CPT-11 100 mg m(-2) was administered on days 1, 8 and 15. The median survival time was 50.0 weeks for patients on CPT-P, 45.6 weeks for those on VDS-P and 46.0 weeks for those on CPT (P=0.115, CPT-P vs VDS-P; P=0.089, CPT vs VDS-P), and the hazard ratio was 0.85 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.65-1.11) for CPT-P vs VDS-P and 0.83 (0.64-1.09) for CPT vs VDS-P. The response rate was 43.7% for patients on CPT-P, 31.7% for those on VDS-P and 20.5% for those on CPT. Major adverse reactions were grade 4 neutropenia observed in 37, 54 and 8% of the patients on CPT-P, VDS-P and CPT, respectively; and grades 3 and 4 diarrhoea observed in 12, 3 and 15% of the patients, respectively. CPT-P therapy produces comparable survival to VDS-P in patients with advanced NSCLC. CPT-11 monotherapy is not inferior to VDS-P in terms of survival. The CPT-11-containing regimen is one of the most efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of advanced NSCLC.     

A dose-escalation study of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with a cisplatin-based front line chemotherapy

PURPOSE: CPT-11 and gemcitabine are both active agents against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted a phase I study to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of their combination in patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with histologically confirmed NSCLC, who had failed cisplatin-based front-line chemotherapy, were enrolled. The patients' median age was 56 years, 24 were male and 22 had a performance status (WHO) 0-1. Gemcitabine was administered on days 1 and 8, as a 30-minute i.v. infusion, at escalated doses ranging from 900 to 1200 mg/m2. CPT-11 was given over a 60-minute i.v. infusion on day 8 at escalated doses ranging from 200 to 350 mg/m2, following gemcitabine administration. The treatment was repeated every three weeks. RESULTS: The MTD was exceeded at dose-level 7 with CPT-11 350 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1200 mg/m2, where all three enrolled patients presented DLTs (one patient grade 4 thrombocytopenia, one grade 3 diarrhea and one grade 3 asthenia). The recommended doses for future phase II studies are CPT-11 300 mg/m2 on day 8 and gemcitabine 1200 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8. A total of 107 treatment cycles were administered. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 13 (13%) cycles, febrile neutropenia in 3 (3%) and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 2 (2%). Grade 2/3 diarrhea was seen in 6 (6%) cycles, grade 2/3 nausea and vomiting in 13 (13%) and grade 2/3 asthenia in 8 (8%). Other toxicities were mild. Among 23 patients evaluable for response, PR was achieved in one (4.5%), SD in 12 (52.5%) and PD in 10 (43%). CONCLUSION: The results of this phase I study clearly demonstrate that gemcitabine and CPT-11 can be efficiently combined in a low-toxicity regimen with doses equal or near monotherapy levels. Further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of this combination in both chemotherapy-naive and pre-treated patients with advanced NSCLC.     

A phase II study of irinotecan combined with cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer. CPT-11 Lung Cancer Study Group

Based upon the results of phase I study of irinotecan (CPT-11) combined with cisplatin (CDDP) on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a combination phase II study on NSCLC was carried out from Feb., 1992 to Sep., 1992. CPT-11 (60 mg/m2) and CDDP (80 mg/m2) were administered by i.v. drip infusion, with administration schedules of Days 1, 8, 15 and only Day 1, respectively. This therapy course was repeated every 4 weeks. Subjects were NSCLC patients of stage III B or IV disease. Those without prior chemotherapy (Group A) and those with prior therapy (Group B) were enrolled separately. Seventy patients were entered into Group A and 32 patients into Group B. One of the patients of Group A was ineligible. The characteristics of the eligible cases of Group A were: male/female, 51/18; median age, 61 years old; PS 0/1/2, 18/39/12; stage IIIB/IV, 26/43; and adeno/squamous/large, 51/15/3. Those of group B were: male/female, 20/12; median age, 62 years old; PS 0/1/2, 5/18/9; stage I/IIIB/IV, 1/7/24, adeno/squamous/large/ad-sq, 28/2/1/1. Thirty-three patients (47.8%) responded in Group A and B patients (25.0%) responded in Group B. Major adverse reactions (grade 3 or higher) of Group A/Group B were neutropenia (80.3%/73.3%), anemia (35.3%/34.4%), diarrhea (18.8%/28.1%) and nausea/vomiting (34.8%/34.4%). Median survival times for Group A and Group B were 308 and 295 days, respectively. CPT-11 in combination with CDDP is effective against NSCLC, suggesting that further studies are needed to determine the usefulness of this therapy.     

Phase II study of irinotecan and ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES: This phase II study was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of irinotecan (CPT-11) and ifosfamide as first-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Eligibility criteria included histologically or cytologically confirmed NSCLC (stage IIIb or IV), no prior treatment, and measurable or evaluable disease. CPT-11 (80 mg/m(2)) was administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15, while ifosfamide (1.5 g/m(2)) was given on days 1 through 3 every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Forty-four patients (31 men) with a median age of 65 years (range 43-75) and a median ECOG performance status of 1 (range 0-2) were enrolled. The response rate was 29.5% [95% CI: 16.7-45.2%], with 13 partial responses. The median survival was 12.5 months, the median time to progression was 5.3 months, and the 1 and 2-year survival rates were 52.3 and 11.3%, respectively. Toxicity was generally mild; WHO grade 3-4 neutropenia was recorded in 38.6% of the patients, grade 3 diarrhea in 6.8%, and grade 3-4 nausea/vomiting in 0%. CONCLUSIONS: CPT-11 combined with ifosfamide demonstrated anti-tumor activity in advanced NSCLC, with response and survival rates similar to those of cisplatin-based chemotherapy but with a more favorable toxicity profile.     

高频热疗联合吉西他滨治疗老年中晚期非小细胞肺癌临床观察

目的观察高频热疗联合吉西他滨单药化疗治疗老年中晚期非小细胞肺癌的近期疗效、生存率、毒副作用及临床受益情况。方法将2003年2月至2006年12月间共80例老年中晚期非小细胞肺癌患者随机分入观察组和对照组。观察组（40例）采用高频热疗联合吉西他滨单药化疗,共4个周期,治疗结束后1个月评价疗效及毒副作用;对照组（40例）采用吉西他滨联合顺铂化疗,共4个周期,治疗结束后1个月评价疗效及毒副作用。然后对两组患者进行随访,统计生存率并进行比较。结果观察组与对照组比较,近期疗效差异无显著性,临床受益率明显提高,毒副作用减少,1,2年生存率差异无显著性。结论高频热疗联合吉西他滨单药化疗治疗老年中晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效确切,临床受益率明显提高,毒副作用可耐受。     

First-line gemcitabine versus epirubicin in postmenopausal women aged 60 or older with metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter, randomized, phase III study.

BACKGROUND: This randomized, phase III study compared the efficacy and safety of first-line gemcitabine versus epirubicin in the treatment of postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged > or = 60 years (median 68 years) with clinically measurable MBC received either gemcitabine 1200 mg/m(2) or epirubicin 35 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. RESULTS: Of 410 patients entered, 397 (198 gemcitabine and 199 epirubicin) were randomized and qualified for the time to progressive disease (TTP) and survival analyses. Total cycles administered in 185 gemcitabine and 192 epirubicin patients, respectively, were 699 (mean 3.5, range 0-12) and 917 (mean 4.6, range 0-10). Epirubicin demonstrated statistically significant superiority in TTP (6.1 and 3.4 months, P=0.0001), overall survival (19.1 and 11.8 months, P=0.0004), and independently assessed response rate (40.3% and 16.4% in 186 and 183 evaluable patients, P <0.001). For gemcitabine (n=190) and epirubicin (n=192), respectively, common WHO grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (25.3% and 17.9%) and leukopenia (14.3% and 19.3%). Of the 28 on-study deaths (17 gemcitabine, 11 epirubicin), three were considered possibly or probably related to treatment (gemcitabine). CONCLUSIONS: Postmenopausal women > or =60 years of age with MBC tolerate chemotherapy well. In this study, epirubicin was superior to gemcitabine in the treatment of MBC in women age > or =60, confirming that anthracyclines remain important drugs for first-line treatment of MBC.     

Second-line treatment with irinotecan plus cisplatin vs cisplatin of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer pretreated with taxanes and gemcitabine: a multicenter randomised phase II study

The aim of this study was to compare the irinotecan/cisplatin regimen with cisplatin as second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) pretreated with a taxane/gemcitabine regimen. Patients (n = 147) with stage IV NSCLC pretreated with a taxane/gemcitabine regimen were randomly assigned to receive either irinotecan (110 mg m(-2), day 1 and 100 mg m(-2), day 8) and cisplatin (80 mg m(-2), day 8) (IC; n = 74) or CDDP (80 mg m(-2), day 1) (C; n = 73) every 3 weeks. Patients treated with IC and C had a median survival of 7.8 and 8.8 months, respectively (P = 0.933). The 1-year survival rate was 34.3% for IC-treated patients and 31.7% for C-treated patients. Cox's regression analysis revealed that response to treatment (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.787; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1578-4.922) and performance status (HR = 1.865; 95% CI: 1.199-2.872) was independent prognostic factors for survival. Overall response rate was 22.5% (95% CI: 12.8-32.2%) for IC-treated patients and 7.0% (95% CI: 1.15-13.6%) for C-treated patients (P = 0.012); tumour growth control (partial remission (PR) + stable disease (SD)) was observed in 26 (38%) IC and 25 (36%) C patients (P = 0.878). There was no difference in terms of quality of life between the two chemotherapy arms. The incidence of febrile neutropenia, grade 3 and 4 neutropenia and grade 3 and 4 diarrhoea was significantly higher in the IC- than the C-treated patients. Other toxicities were mild. There were no treatment-related deaths in either arm. The IC regimen did not confer a survival benefit compared with C as second-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC pretreated with a taxane/gemcitabine regimen, despite its better efficacy in terms of response rate.     

Docetaxel versus docetaxel plus gemcitabine as front-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized, multicenter phase III trial

To compare the overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced non-small cell lung (NSCLC) treated with either docetaxel plus gemcitabine or single-agent docetaxel. Chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive either DG [n=157; gemcitabine 1100mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8], docetaxel 75mg/m(2) on day 8 or D [n=155; docetaxel 100mg/m(2) on day 1] every 3 weeks. A total of 312 patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. A predefined interim intention-to-treat analysis showed significantly longer median OS (p=0.037) in favor of the DG regimen (9.4 months versus 8.3 months for DG and D regimens, respectively), resulting in the premature termination of the study. The DG regimen was also associated with a significantly higher response rate compared to D (26.8% versus 11.6%, p<0.001). TTP were 3.5 and 2.3 months for the DG and D regimen, respectively (p=0.054). Although there were two treatment-related deaths in the DG arm, the toxicity profiles of the two regimens were comparable. The DG regimen was associated with a significantly better quality of life. The efficacy of the docetaxel plus gemcitabine combination is superior to single-agent docetaxel in chemonaive patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Weekly irinotecan and cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter phase II study.

The combination of weekly irinotecan (CPT-11) and monthly cisplatin has shown promising activity in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in previous Phase I and II studies. However, same-day administration of these agents may better exploit their therapeutic synergy and minimize toxicities. This multicenter Phase II study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination of weekly CPT-11 and weekly cisplatin in patients with advanced NSCLC. Patients with chemotherapy-naive stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were treated with repeated cycles of therapy comprising weekly treatment with both cisplatin and CPT-11 for 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest. The starting doses of CPT-11 and cisplatin were 65 and 30 mg/m2, respectively. Treatment was continued until the occurrence of disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or a maximum of six cycles. Fifty patients were enrolled. The median age was 59 years (range, 44-79 years). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0 in 22 patients, 1 in 19 patients, and 2 in 9 patients. Seven and 43 patients had stages IIIB and IV disease, respectively. Five patients had brain metastasis. Patients received a median of three 6-week cycles (range, 1-6). The objective response rate was 36% (18 of 50; 95% confidence interval, 24-54%) and included 18 partial responses. Median time to tumor progression was 6.9 months (range, 0.6-15.2). The median survival was 11.6 months (range, 0.16-21.9 months), and the 1-year survival rate was 46%. Grade 3/4 nonhematological toxicities included vomiting (12%) and diarrhea (26%). Grade 3/4 hematological toxicities included anemia (14%), neutropenia (26%), and thrombocytopenia (14%). Relative dose intensities for CPT-11 and cisplatin were 89 and 62%, respectively. Weekly combined administration of CPT-11 and cisplatin achieved a promising overall response rate, median time to tumor progression, and median survival in patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. The regimen was well tolerated, and the planned dose intensity was well maintained. Further evaluation of this combination in NSCLC is warranted.     

Mismatch repair system (MMR) status correlates with response and survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients

Pre-clinical data suggested a relationship between inactivation of hMLH1 and hMSH2 and resistance to drugs like cisplatin and carboplatin, but not oxaliplatin. We then hypothesised that NSCLC showing loss of expression of the mismatch repair system (MMR), could be refractory to cisplatin-based, but not to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Immunohistochemical expression of hMLH1 and hMSH2 was analysed on tumour samples from 93 advanced NSCLC, receiving chemotherapy with either cisplatin or oxaliplatin in combination with gemcitabine. Patients showing loss of hMLH1 or hMSH2 expression in > or = 50% of tumour cells were deemed MMR-negative (Group A), whereas cases with a normal hMLH1 or hMSH2 expression in > 50% of the tumour cells were defined MMR-positive (Group B). No differences in the response and progression rate were found in the whole patients population and in the gemcitabine/cisplatin group for both hMLH1 and hMSH2. In the gemcitabine/oxaliplatin group response rate was 38% and 0% (p=0.04) for patients with or without loss of hMSH2 expression. Median survival according to MMR status in Groups A and B, respectively was: 17 months versus 9 months for hMLH1 (p=0.031) and 10 months versus 9 months for hMSH2 (p=0.8330). Both the difference in response rate and in median survival observed according to MMR status seem to confirm what has been suggested by preclinical studies.     

Results of a phase II trial of gemcitabine in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and a performance status of 2

This trial was designed to determine the 1-year survival rate, efficacy, progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity with gemcitabine in patients with stage IIIB (with pleural effusion) or stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 2. Gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 was administered intravenously on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle. Treatment consisted of 6 cycles; patients who responded with complete response or partial response received < or = 2 additional cycles. Forty-two patients were enrolled at 31 community-based centers between March and November 2002. Most patients had stage IV disease (74%). The median age was 73 years (range, 58-84 years), and 19% had received prior palliative radiation therapy. Patients received a median of 3 cycles (range, 1-8 cycles). The median survival was 4.8 months (range, < 1 to 19.2 months), and the estimated 1-year survival was 20%. Median PFS was 2.5 months (range, < 1 to 19.2 months), and PFS at 1 year was 11.1%. Thirty-one patients died of disease progression, and 1 each died of myocardial infarction, brain herniation, pneumonia, and respiratory failure. Seven patients were not evaluable for response; 4 refused or received no treatment, treatment in 2 failed (myocardial infarction and pneumonia), and 1 was lost to follow-up. Among 35 evaluable patients, there were 5 partial responses (14%), 10 with stable disease (29%), and 20 with disease progression (57%). Drug-related grade > or = 3 toxicities included neutropenia (18%), anemia (8%), and dyspnea (2.6%). These results suggest that patients with NSCLC with an ECOG PS of 2 may benefit from single-agent chemotherapy gemcitabine. General toxicity, including myelotoxicity, was relatively low. Further studies comparing single-agent chemotherapy with combination chemotherapy for patients with a PS of 2 are warranted.     

培美曲塞二钠单药治疗老年非小细胞肺癌21例

[目的]观察培美曲塞二钠单药治疗老年非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效和不良反应。[方法]经病理学或细胞学确诊的老年（65～80岁）晚期ⅢA～Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌43例,21例患者接受培美曲塞二钠500mg/m2治疗,静脉滴注,d1;22例患者接受吉西他滨1000mg/m2治疗,d1、8、15。21d为1个周期,接受2个周期以上化疗,每2个周期评估疗效、不良反应。[结果]培美曲塞二钠组和吉西他滨组临床获益率分别是57.14%和59.09%（P=0.897）,中位生存期分别是9.5个月和8.9个月（P=0.813）,1年生存率分别是28.6%和27.3%（P=0.9244）。两组主要的不良反应是骨髓抑制和胃肠道反应,其中培美曲塞二钠组中性粒细胞降低发生率明显低于吉西他滨组（Ⅰ～Ⅱ度：19.05%vs59.09%,P=0.0073,Ⅲ～Ⅳ度：9.52%vs27.27%,P=0.0261）;培美曲塞二钠组胃肠道反应发生率也明显低于吉西他滨组（Ⅰ～Ⅱ度：14.29%vs59.09%,P=0.0017;Ⅲ～Ⅳ度：4.76%vs40.91%,P=0.0050）。[结论]培美曲塞二钠和吉西他滨单药治疗老年非小细胞肺癌疗效均较好,但培美曲塞二钠不良反应低于吉西他滨。     

Phase II study of irinotecan and carboplatin for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

A phase II study was conducted to assess the activity and toxicity of irinotecan (CPT-11) and carboplatin (CBDCA) combination chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Eligibility included chemo-naive advanced NSCLC patients with measurable disease and a good performance status. CPT-11 of 50 mg/m(2) was administered as a 90-min intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, and 15. CBDCA dosed to an area under the concentration-time curve of 5 mgmin/ml, using Calvert's formula, was administered by 90-min infusion after the CPT-11 infusion on day 1. Treatment was repeated 28 days interval for at least two cycles. Haematopoietic growth factors were not routinely used. From December 1997 to January 1999, 36 patients were entered into the study. The overall response rate was 25.0% (95% confidence interval: 12.1-42.2%). The median survival time and the 1-year survival rate were 10.2 months and 42.2%, respectively. Major toxicity by Japan Clinical Oncology Group criteria was as follows: grade 3-4 neutropenia 76.5%; grade 3 anemia 26.5%; grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia 47.1%; grade 3 nausea/vomiting 36.1%; grade 3-4 diarrhoea 5.9%; grade 3 alopecia 5.9%; grade 3-4 skin rush 2.9%. Four patients developed febrile neutropenia and only one had serious diarrhea induced by CPT-11. Actual relative delivery dose of CPT-11 to the projected one on days 8 and 15 were 0.86 and 0.43, respectively. It seemed that CPT-11 and CBDCA was more toxic regimen than CPT-11 and CDDP in advanced NSCLC. The relatively disappointing response rate could be related with low dose intensity of CPT-11.     

Phase II study of irinotecan plus cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the antitumor efficacy and safety of a combination of irinotecan (CPT-11) and cisplatin in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A secondary objective was to characterize the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of CPT-11 and its active metabolite, SN-38. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were treated with repeated 4-week courses comprising CPT-11 (60 mg/m(2)) administered on days 1, 8, and 15, and a single dose of cisplatin (80 mg/m(2)) after CPT-11 administration on day 1. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were enrolled, including 33 men and 19 women. The median age was 61 years (range, 29 to 79 years). Southwest Oncology Group performance status was 0 in 12 patients, 1 in 32 patients, and 2 in eight patients. Eleven and 41 patients had stage IIIB and IV disease, respectively. Objective responses occurred in 28.8% of patients (15 of 52; 95% confidence interval, 16.5% to 41.2%). The median survival duration was 9.9 months (range, 1.6 to 30.8 months). The 1-year survival rate was 37%. Grade 3/4 adverse events consisted primarily of nausea (32. 7% ) or vomiting (13.5%), late-onset diarrhea (17.3%), and neutropenia (46.1%). The study design led to preferential modification of CPT-11 doses, resulting in CPT-11 dose attenuations to < or = 40 mg/m(2) in the majority of patients (31 of 52; 60%), whereas dose reductions of cisplatin were uncommon. CPT-11 pharmacokinetic parameters were comparable to those reported previously in single-agent studies. CONCLUSION: CPT-11/cisplatin is an active combination regimen with manageable toxicity in the therapy of stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. Future studies should be designed with schedules and dose modification provisions that avoid unnecessary CPT-11 dose reductions to exploit more directly the therapeutic synergy of these agents.     

化疗药物敏感试验指导原发性肝细胞癌术后化疗的临床研究

目的:探讨体外化疗敏感试验ATP-TCA系统对化疗药物疗效的评估作用,利用该系统指导肝细胞癌(hepatocelluarcarcinoma,HCC)患者的临床个体化疗。方法:获取50个HCC手术标本,采用ATP-TCA系统评估5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)、丝裂霉素(MMC)、顺铂(DDP)、草酸铂(OXA)、表阿霉素(EPI)、健择(GEM)、伊利替康(CPT-11)、依托泊苷(Vp-16)和多西他赛(PTX)化疗药物的疗效。23例HCC患者接受术后ATP-TCA指导临床化疗,同时以20例HCC患者作为对照,观察临床疗效。结果:ATP-TCA系统可评估率为90·8%。对各种化疗药物部分-强敏感率分别为PTX46%、CPT-1144%、GEM36%、MMC14%、EPI12%、DDP8%、Vp-166%、OXA6%和5-FU4%;观察终点ATP-TCA组疗效指标(CR、PR、SD和PD)获得较好结果,P=0·008;观察期实验组和对照组患者死亡率差异无统计学意义,P=0·763;实验组较对照组在病情缓解率(ORR)以及手术后生存期及无疾病进展生存方面表现出明显的优势,P值分别为0·0430、0·0057和0·0045。结论:ATP-TCA系统可以成功地应用于HCC患者。PTX、CPT-11和GEM对HCC具有较高疗效;根据体外药物敏感方案进行个体化疗,部分患者在病情缓解时间(TTP)以及手术后生存期方面获益。肿瘤防治杂志,2005,12(19):1457-1461     

Combination chemotherapy with irinotecan hydrochloride plus carboplatin for patients with advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer--a pilot study

A pilot study was performed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) plus carboplatin (CBDCA) for treatment of advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer. Fifteen patients with colorectal cancer (nonresectable, 1; noncurative resection, 5; recurrent disease, 9) were treated with CPT-11 (40-50 mg/m2) plus CBDCA (70-100 mg/m2) once a week for 2-3 weeks followed by a one-week rest. This treatment was repeated until disease progression or severe toxic effects were found. The total dose of CPT-11 ranged from 135 to 1,214 (median, 467) mg/m2 and that of CBDCA ranged from 267 to 2,022 (median, 933) mg/m2. Adverse effects included nausea (grade 2) in 2 (13.3%) diarrhea (grade 2) in 2 (13.3%), leukopenia (grade 3) in 2 (13.3%), thrombocytopenia (grade 1) in one (6.7%), and hair falling (grade 3) in one (6.7%). The response rate of 14 evaluable patients was 14.3% (CR, 1; PR,1; NC,7; PD,5). The median survival time of all patients was 405 days from the start of chemotherapy. The survival time of patients with CR, PR, and NC (n = 9) tended to be longer than that of those with PD (n = 5) (p = 0.06). The median time to disease progression was 105 days. These results suggest that this combination chemotherapy is feasible and effective in the treatment of advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer.     

Phase II trial of irinotecan,paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with previously untreated Stage IIIB/IV nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND: This Phase II multicenter, open-label, single-arm study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a three-drug combination of irinotecan (CPT-11), paclitaxel, and carboplatin in advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients received repeated 21-day cycles at starting doses of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) administered over 3 hours, followed by carboplatin AUC of 5 over 30 minutes and CPT-11 at a starting dose level of 100 mg/m(2) over 90 minutes, all given on the first day of each cycle. Patients were evaluated for objective tumor response, time to tumor progression (TTP), survival, and safety. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled. Baseline patient characteristics included: median age 58 years (range, 32-79); 23 males and 17 females; performance status of 0 (21 patients), 1 (18 patients), or 2 (1 patient); and Stage IIIB (10 patients) and Stage IV (30 patients) disease. A median of six cycles (range, one to eight) were administered. Grade 3-4 toxicities observed in >/= 10% of the patients included neutropenia (78%), asthenia (20%), diarrhea (20%), nausea (18%), vomiting (13%), anemia (10%), and dyspnea (10%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in eight patients (20%), with one death due to neutropenic sepsis. Twelve of 38 evaluable patients had confirmed tumor responses (32%), while 21 (55%) had stable disease (including 12 patients [32%] with minor responses). Only 13% had disease progression at their initial tumor assessment. The median TTP and survival were 5.3 months (range, 0.03-6.2 months) and 12.5 months (range 0.3-28.6+ months), respectively. The one and two year survival probabilities were 0.50 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.73) and 0.21 (95% CI, 0.0-0.67), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of CPT-11, paclitaxel, and carboplatin can be safely administered and is active in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Based on the favorable survival outcome, this regimen is undergoing evaluation in prospective randomized trials.     

Prognostic value of tumor size in non-small cell lung cancer larger than five centimeters in diameter

OBJECTIVES: The tumor size is an important prognostic factor in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, a criterion for tumor size has remained unchanged for the last 25 years in TNM classification. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between tumor size and survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. METHOD: Of 550 consecutive patients who underwent operation for NSCLC between 1994 and 1998, we reviewed the medical record of 509 patients. There were 470 men and 39 women. Survivals were compared according to groups of tumor size (Group I: < or = 3 cm, Group II: 3.1-4 cm, Group III: 4.1-5 cm, Group IV: >5 cm, Group A (II + III): 3.1-5 cm, and Group B (IV): >5 cm). The Cox proportional hazard model was used with same variables. RESULTS: The univariate analysis showed that poor pulmonary function test (P < 0.05), pneumonectomy (P < 0.05), limited resection (P < 0.001), tumor size larger than 5 cm (P = 0.006), T factor (P < 0.05), N status (P < 0.001), and advanced staged of disease (P < 0.001) were all significant prognostic factors. Further comparison of survival between tumor size groups demonstrated a significantly poor prognosis for larger tumors. There was a statistically significant difference between Group A (3.1-5 cm) and Group B (> 5 cm), with 5 years survivals of 45.9% and 31.4%, respectively (P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: We emphasize that tumor size is an important prognostic factor in NSCLC. The 5 years survival with tumors larger than 5 cm (31.4%), is significantly less than the tumors 3.1-5 cm (45.9%) (P = 0.005). These initial results should strongly encourage additional studies in different countries on the interaction between tumor size and lung cancer characteristics to better clarity. In future revisions of the TNM classification, 5 cm may be a new threshold.