Once versus divided daily dosing with delayed-release mesalazine: a study of tissue drug concentrations and standard pharmacokinetic parameters

BACKGROUND: Delayed-release mesalazine is traditionally taken as three divided doses. However, it is well-recognized that dosing frequency has a significant impact on compliance and that once daily dosing is preferable. METHODS: We measured serum, urinary, faecal and rectal tissue concentrations of 5-aminosalicylic acid and N-acetyl 5-aminosalicylic acid in 24 healthy volunteers following dosing with delayed-release mesalazine, 1.2 g or 2.4 g daily, given as either a single daily dose at 08:00 hours or in three divided doses at 08:00, 13:00 and 18:00 hours. RESULTS: Urinary and faecal excretion and rectal tissue concentrations of 5-aminosalicylic acid and N-acetyl 5-aminosalicylic acid were similar following single or divided daily dosing, at both doses studied. Peak serum concentrations were found at 06:00-09:00 following divided dosing and at 17:00-20:00 following once daily dosing. However, peak and trough serum levels and serum area under curve values (AUC) were similar with both regimens and at both doses. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary, faecal and rectal tissue concentrations are similar following single or divided daily dosing. Minor differences in serum levels were apparent but maximum, minimum and AUC values were similar. Clinical trials should examine the efficacy and toxicity of once daily dosing in patients with ulcerative colitis.     

Oral delayed-release mesalazine: a review of its use in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease

Oral delayed-release mesalazine is an enteric-coated formulation which releases mesalazine in the terminal ileum and colon. Up to 74% of patients with mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis experience endoscopic or symptomatic improvement (including remission) or both when treated with oral delayed-release mesalazine 2.4 to 4.8 g/day. There is a trend towards a better response in patients receiving higher daily dosages of oral delayed-release mesalazine, especially in patients with active distal disease. In patients with left-sided ulcerative colitis, oral balsalazide 6.75 g/day appears to be more effective than oral delayed-release mesalazine 2.4 g/day, but a higher dosage of oral delayed-release mesalazine 4.8 g/day may provide additional benefit in these patients. Oral delayed-release mesalazine 0.8 to 4.4 g/day appears to be as effective as sulfasalazine 2 to 4 g/day, prolonged-release mesalazine 1.5 g/day or balsalazide 3 g/day in maintaining remission in patients with ulcerative colitis. The optimal dosage of oral delayed-release mesalazine for the maintenance of remission is unclear. However, oral delayed-release mesalazine 1.6 g/day with rectal mesalazine 4g, administered twice weekly, was more effective than oral drug alone in maintaining remission in patients at high risk of relapse. In patients with left-sided or distal disease oral olsalazine 1 g/day appeared to be superior to oral delayed-release mesalazine 1.2 g/day for maintenance of symptomatic remission. Limited data in patients with Crohn's disease have shown oral delayed-release mesalazine 0.4 to 4.8 g/day to be an effective therapy for active disease (remission in up to 45% of patients) and for quiescent disease (relapse in 34% of recipients over a duration of up to 12 months). Preliminary data indicate that oral delayed-release mesalazine 2.4 g/day is effective in preventing postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease. Oral delayed-release mesalazine is effective and well tolerated in sulfasalazine-intolerant patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease. CONCLUSIONS: Oral delayed-release mesalazine is effective in patients with mild to moderately active or quiescent ulcerative colitis. Available data suggest that patients with left-sided or distal ulcerative colitis are likely to require higher daily dosages of oral delayed-release mesalazine or supplementation with rectal mesalazine. Oral delayed-release mesalazine also appears to be effective in active and quiescent Crohn's disease. The drug is well tolerated and it appears to be effective in sulfasalazine-intolerant patients.     

MMX mesalazine for the induction of remission of mild-to-moderately active ulcerative colitis: efficacy and tolerability in specific patient subpopulations

Background  Two phase III studies have evaluated mesalazine (mesalamine) with MMX (Multi Matrix System) technology in patients with active mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis.
Aim  To determine the efficacy of MMX mesalazine for the induction of clinical and endoscopic remission in specific subgroups of patients with active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis.
Methods  Data from two double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were analysed (517 out-patients). Patients were randomized to receive MMX mesalazine [2.4 g/day (once daily or 1.2 g twice daily) or 4.8 g/day (once daily)] or placebo for 8 weeks.
Results  The percentages of patients treated with MMX mesalazine, 2.4 or 4.8 g/day, in clinical and endoscopic remission at week 8 were similar and significantly ( P  < 0.05) greater than placebo in subgroups stratified by disease extent, disease severity and gender and among patients not previously receiving low-dose 5-aminosalicylic acid. Among patients transferring directly from prior low-dose oral 5-aminosalicylic acid, MMX mesalazine 4.8 g/day was significantly ( P  = 0.018) more effective than placebo in inducing clinical and endoscopic remission. Efficacy over placebo did not reach significance in patients transferring directly to MMX mesalazine 2.4 g/day.
Conclusion  MMX mesalazine is effective in active UC regardless of disease extent, disease severity, gender and previous, low-dose, 5-ASA therapy.     

Systemic availability of 5-aminosalicylic acid: comparison of delayed release and an azo-bond preparation

Aim: To determine the systemic uptake of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) and acetyl-5-ASA (Ac-5-ASA) at steady state during treatment with either an azo-bond preparation, olsalazine, or a delayed-release mesalazine.
Methods: In an open cross-over trial with randomized sequence, 15 patients with ulcerative colitis in remission were given 7-day courses of olsalazine (Dipentum 1.0 g daily) and of mesalazine (Asacol 1.6 g daily). Plasma and urine were collected on days 6 and 7 of each course and concentrations of 5-ASA and Ac-5-ASA were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).
Results: Mean steady-state plasma concentrations of 5-ASA and Ac-5-ASA were significantly higher after treatment with mesalazine than with olsalazine ( P < 0.0001). Total urinary excretion of 5-ASA and Ac-5-ASA as a percentage of the given dose was significantly higher on mesalazine than on olsalazine ( P <0.01).
Only two patients experienced, during the first 3 days of treatment with olsalazine, transient watery diarrhoea which resolved spontaneously. No unexpected or major changes in haematology or biochemistry were detected during the study.
Conclusion: As 5-ASA acts locally, the lower systemic load provided by olsalazine may increase efficacy and reduce the potential risk of nephrotoxicity during long-term maintenance treatment of ulcerative colitis.     

Once daily MMX mesalazine for the treatment of mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis: a phase II, dose-ranging study

Background SPD476 (MMX? mesalazine), is a novel, once daily, high‐strength mesalazine formulation (1.2 g/tablet) that utilizes Multi Matrix System? (MMX) technology to delay and extend delivery of the active drug throughout the colon. Aim To assess the safety and efficacy of MMX mesalazine in patients with mild‐to‐moderately active ulcerative colitis, in a pilot, phase II, randomized, multicentre, double‐blind, parallel‐group, dose‐ranging study (SPD476‐202). Methods Thirty‐eight patients with mild‐to‐moderately active ulcerative colitis were randomized to MMX mesalazine 1.2, 2.4 or 4.8 g/day given once daily for 8 weeks. Remission ulcerative colitis‐disease activity index (UC‐DAI) ≤1, a score of 0 for rectal bleeding and stool frequency, and ≥1‐point reduction in sigmoidoscopy score from baseline was the primary end point. Results Week 8 remission rates were 0%, 31% and 18% of patients receiving MMX mesalazine 1.2, 2.4 and 4.8 g/day respectively. No statistically significant difference in remission was observed between treatment groups. MMX mesalazine 2.4 and 4.8 g/day groups demonstrated greater improvement in overall UC‐DAI and component scores from baseline, compared with the 1.2 g/day group. Conclusion MMX mesalazine given as 2.4 or 4.8 g/day once daily is well tolerated and effective for the treatment of mild‐to‐moderately active ulcerative colitis.     

Balsalazide: a review of its therapeutic use in mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis

The aminosalicylate balsalazide is a prodrug which is metabolised by bacterial azo reductases in the colon to release its therapeutically active moiety mesalazine [mesalamine (US) or 5-aminosalicylic acid] and an inert carrier molecule. The systemic absorption of balsalazide and its metabolites is not required for the therapeutic efficacy of the drug, and has been demonstrated to be limited. Data from well designed trials with a duration of 8 to 12 weeks show that oral balsalazide 6.75 g/day is as effective as (two trials) or more effective than (one trial) oral delayed-release (pH-dependent) mesalazine 2.4 g/day and appears to be as effective as oral sulfasalazine 3 g/day in the treatment of active mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. In addition, balsalazide appears to have a faster onset of action than mesalazine. Furthermore, balsalazide was as effective as delayed-release mesalazine (dosages used were 1.2 and 1.5 g/day, where 1.6 g/day is recommended) and oral sulfasalazine 2 g/day (recommended dosage) in the prevention of relapse in ulcerative colitis in remission after 6 to 12 months of treatment; the balsalazide dosage was 3 g/day versus mesalazine and 2 g/day versus sulfasalazine. Although not well established, additional benefits may be achieved with balsalazide dosages up to 6 g/day. Data from well designed, 2- to 12-month trials show that balsalazide is well tolerated by patients with ulcerative colitis in both acute and maintenance indications, and is better tolerated than standard formulations of sulfasalazine at therapeutically relevant dosages. CONCLUSION: Balsalazide is a well tolerated and effective first-line therapeutic option for patients with ulcerative colitis, both for the treatment of active mild-to-moderate disease and as maintenance therapy to prevent disease relapse.     

Intestinal metabolism and transport of 5-aminosalicylate.

The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics of intestinal absorption and metabolism of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5ASA). Regional perfusions of 5ASA in the anesthetized rat resulted in the appearance of N-acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid in the intestinal lumen. Lumenal metabolite appearance was proportional to 5ASA permeability, which was 5-fold higher in the jejunum than in the ileum. Intestinal elimination significantly decreases 5ASA absorption at low lumenal drug concentrations and this process is saturated at high drug concentrations. Metabolite levels in intestinal tissue were higher than plasma levels at low perfusion drug concentrations, whereas the reverse was observed at high concentrations. Transport and metabolism of 5ASA was studied in Caco-2 monolayers. At low drug concentrations, 5ASA was preferentially transported in the basolateral (BL) to apical (AP) direction. With 5ASA incubation in either the AP or BL chamber, the N-acetyl metabolite appeared only in the AP compartment. Transport of N-acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid was also exclusively observed in the BL to AP direction. Clinical data indicate that anti-inflammatory response to oral 5ASA correlates with the amount of 5ASA delivered to the intestinal tissue. This study shows that at lumenal levels below 200 microg/ml (concentrations that are typically achieved by controlled release dosage forms), intestinal secretion of 5ASA accounts for more than 50% of the total elimination and can significantly affect tissue levels and, therefore, may be an important factor in determining the response to 5ASA therapy.     

Mesalazine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in chronic inflammatory bowel disease

Mesalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid; mesalamine), the active moiety of sulphasalazine (salazosulfapyridine), is available in specially formulated oral and rectal forms for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis of mild to moderate severity and for maintenance therapy during disease remission. Tablets or capsules coated with acrylic-based resin and tablets containing microgranules coated with ethylcellulose deliver mesalazine to the distal small intestine and colon, thus avoiding the need for the carrier, sulphapyridine, which is responsible for many of the adverse effects associated with sulphasalazine. Since mesalazine is released in the small intestine from some coated preparations in contrast to sulphasalazine, these oral formulations have therapeutic potential in Crohn's disease. A limited number of therapeutic trials suggest that orally administered mesalazine 1.5 to 2.4g daily is of similar efficacy to sulphasalazine 2 to 3g daily in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis. The efficacy of mesalazine enemas has been more widely investigated, a dose of 1 to 4g once daily being consistently more effective than placebo and apparently similar to enemas of prednisone 25mg or oral sulphasalazine 3g. Initial results suggest that mesalazine 4g enemas may be more effective than those containing hydrocortisone 100mg. Mesalazine and sulphasalazine in approximately equivalent oral dosages are similarly effective in maintaining remission in ulcerative colitis. Orally administered coated mesalazine is generally well tolerated by about 85% of patients allergic to or intolerant of sulphasalazine, the remainder experiencing similar reactions to both drugs. Adverse effects of mesalazine enemas are confined to local irritation and effects resulting from enema-tip insertion. Thus, orally administered coated mesalazine is a suitable alternative to sulphasalazine in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate active distal ulcerative colitis and for maintaining remission particularly in patients allergic to or intolerant of sulphasalazine. In patients who find enema therapy acceptable, mesalazine enemas are effective and well tolerated.     

Studies of compliance with delayed-release mesalazine therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND: Non-compliance with maintenance mesalazine therapy may be a risk factor for relapse in inflammatory bowel disease, but the prevalence and determinants of non-compliance are unknown. AIM: To study the prevalence and determinants of non-compliance in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS: Out-patients receiving delayed-release mesalazine were studied. Compliance was determined by direct enquiry and by analysis of urine samples for 5-aminosalicylic acid/N-acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid. Potential determinants of compliance were assessed. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were studied. Forty-two patients (43%) reported taking <80% of their prescribed dose. Logistic regression revealed the independent predictors of non-compliance to be three-times daily dosing [odds ratio (OR), 3.1; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.8-8.4] and full-time employment (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.1-6.9). Urine from 12 patients (12%) contained no detectable 5-aminosalicylic acid/N-acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid, and 18 patients (18%) had levels below those expected. Depression was the only independent predictor of complete non-compliance (OR, 10.5; 95% CI, 1.8-79.0), and three-times daily dosing was the only independent predictor of partial non-compliance (OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.8-8.9). Self-reporting correctly identified 66% of patients judged to be non-compliant on urinary drug measurement. CONCLUSIONS: Non-compliance with maintenance mesalazine therapy is common in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Three-times daily dosing and full-time employment are predictors of partial non-compliance, whilst depression is associated with complete non-compliance. Self-reporting detects most non-compliant patients.     

Delayed-release Multi Matrix System (MMX) mesalazine: in ulcerative colitis

* Mesalazine appears to act locally on the mucosa of the colon and reduces the inflammation associated with ulcerative colitis. * Following oral administration, the majority (*78%) of a dose of delayed-release Multi Matrix System (MMX) mesalazine passes unabsorbed through the upper gastrointestinal tract to reach and traverse the entire length of the colon. * In a well designed phase III trial in patients with active, mild to moderate ulcerative colitis (n = 262), significantly (p < 0.01) more MMX mesalazine 2.4 (34%) or 4.8 g/day (29%) recipients than placebo recipients (13%) achieved clinical and endoscopic remission after 8 weeks of treatment.* In a second phase III trial (n = 341), clinical and endoscopic remission rates with MMX mesalazine 2.4 (40.5%) and 4.8 g/day (41.2%) were significantly (p < 0.01) greater than with placebo (22.1%) after 8 weeks, while the remission rate with non-MMX delayed-release mesalazine (Asacol) [32.6%] did not differ from placebo.* Overall, MMX mesalazine was generally well tolerated in controlled clinical trials, with a similar incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events in placebo (66%) and MMX mesalazine (56%) recipients in a pooled analysis; most adverse events were of mild or moderate severity. Two of 434 MMX mesalazine recipients experienced serious adverse events that were considered treatment related (pancreatitis caused by mesalazine sensitivity).     

MMX Multi Matrix System mesalazine for the induction of remission in patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis: a combined analysis of two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials

BACKGROUND: MMX mesalazine [LIALDA (US), MEZAVANT XL (UK and Ireland) MEZAVANT (elsewhere)] utilizes MMX Multi Matrix System (MMX) technology which delivers mesalazine throughout the colon. Two phase III studies have already evaluated MMX mesalazine in patients with active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. Aim To provide more precise estimates of the efficacy of MMX mesalazine over placebo by combining the patient populations from the two phase III studies. Methods Combined data from two 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were analyzed. Patients randomized to MMX mesalazine 2.4 g/day (once daily or 1.2 g twice daily), 4.8 g/day (once daily) or placebo were reviewed. The primary end point was clinical and endoscopic remission (modified Ulcerative Colitis-Disease Activity Index of /=1-point reduction in sigmoidoscopy score from week 0). Results Data from 517 patients were analysed. 8-week remission rates were 37.2% and 35.1% in the MMX mesalazine 2.4 g/day and 4.8 g/day groups, vs. 17.5% on placebo (P < 0.001, both comparisons). 8-week complete mucosal healing rates were 32% in both MMX mesalazine groups compared with 16% on placebo. Adverse event frequency was similar in all groups. Conclusion MMX mesalazine is effective and generally well tolerated for inducing clinical and endoscopic remission of active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis.     

Clinical pharmacokinetics of slow release mesalazine

Slow release oral mesalazine (Pentasa) contains microgranules covered by a semipermeable ethylcellulose membrane. The microgranules continuously release their content from duodenum to ileum in a pH- and time-dependent way. About 75% of the microgranules pass into the colon, where further release is slower. This release pattern does not appear to be affected by food, diarrhoea or the simultaneous use of H2 antagonists. Rectal forms of mesalazine deliver active drug directly to the rectum and left colon. Plasma concentrations of mesalazine and its metabolite acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid after oral or local administration are the result of systemic absorption and hepatic metabolism by N-acetyltransferase. Most studies report maximal plasma concentrations of less than 1 mg/L after oral administration of slow release mesalazine, much lower than those observed after uncoated mesalazine but generally higher than after azo-bound drugs such as sulfasalazine. Urinary recovery is an indicator of absorption and metabolism, and is lower after rectal administration (10 to 30%) than after oral administration (30 to 40%). Faecal recovery after oral administration of slow or delayed release mesalazine is lower than with azo-bound drugs. Mesalazine acts locally after absorption by colonic and ileal mucosa. Mean steady-state concentrations of 25.7+/-2.2 microg/kg wet weight are found in ileocolonic biopsy specimens from patients with irritable bowel syndrome treated for 1 week with slow release mesalazine 1.5 g/day. Intramucosal concentrations after slow release mesalazine differ little between healthy individuals and patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Although significant differences are found between the various aminosalicylates in release patterns and the resulting pharmacokinetic parameters, no differences in therapeutic effects have been found in comparative studies. High doses of oral mesalazine (2 to 4 g/day) are more effective than lower doses in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate active ulcerative colitis. High doses (4 g/day) are also effective in the treatment of Crohn's disease, predominantly in patients with ileitis. In contrast, no dose ranging effects were demonstrated with local treatment forms: mesalazine 1g enema seems sufficient for patients with distal colitis. Higher serum concentrations and urinary recoveries after the administration of slow or delayed release mesalazine compared with azo-bound drugs suggest a higher risk for renal adverse effects, although the reported occurrence is extremely low. Although preliminary data support an association between mucosal concentrations of mesalazine and its clinical activity, further studies are needed to correlate the effects of this drug with its pharmacokinetic parameters.     

Comparison of two different daily dosages (2.4 vs. 1.2 g) of oral mesalazine in maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis patients: 1-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND: Mesalazine as maintenance therapy in ulcerative colitis is used worldwide and has been proven to be effective. However, the optimal dosage remains to be defined. AIM: To establish whether daily treatment with 2.4 g of oral mesalazine is more effective than 1.2 g in preventing disease relapse. METHODS: A total of 156 patients with ulcerative colitis in remission were randomly treated for 1 year with 2.4 (n = 80) or 1.2 (n = 76) g/day of mesalazine. Activity of disease was assessed by periodical clinical, endoscopic and histological examinations. RESULTS: After 12 months, 24 of 80 patients (30%) on 2.4 g and 20 of 76 patients (26%) on 1.2 g were still in remission (P = N.S.). Patients in 2.4 g group remained in remission for a longer time than those in 1.2 g group (P < 0.001). Among clinical variables considered in the study, course of disease prior to enrollment (< or = 3 or > 3 relapses/year) was found to influence response to therapy. CONCLUSIONS: A daily dosage of 2.4 g of oral mesalazine seems to better at preventing and delaying relapses of ulcerative colitis than 1.2 g. The course of disease seems to be crucial in choosing the optimal dosage of mesalazine in a maintenance regimen.     

1例对美沙拉秦过敏的溃疡性结肠炎患者的用药分析

目的探讨美沙拉秦缓释颗粒过敏患者的治疗方案及脱敏治疗,为优化溃疡性结肠炎的治疗提供参考。方法分析讨论1例美沙拉秦过敏的溃疡性结肠炎患者的药物治疗情况,采取激素逐渐减量,美沙拉秦逐渐加量至维持剂量的脱敏治疗方法,密切观察患者病情变化,积极随访。结果患者临床症状明显改善,通过1年随访,患者未出现变态反应,病情未复发。结论对于5-氨基水杨酸过敏的溃疡性结肠炎患者,可以通过脱敏治疗,最终口服5-氨基水杨酸制剂长期维持治疗。     

Comparative bioavailability of 5-aminosalicylic acid from a controlled release preparation and an azo-bond preparation

Background: Knowledge of the bioavailability of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA, mesalazine) from the different 5-ASA-containing drugs is important for rational therapy of inflammatory bowel diseases. Methods: The local and systemic bioavailability of 5-ASA from a controlled release 5-ASA preparation (Pentasa—2, 4 or 6 g/day) was investigated and compared with the azo-bond 5-ASA preparation olsalazine (Dipenturn— 2 g/day) in 13 healthy volunteers during steady state conditions. Results: The therapeutically relevant parameter of 5-ASA at the rectal level, expressed as the mean concentration in faecal water, showed a significant trend towards higher concentrations with increasing Pentasa dose: 9.2 mmol/L, 19.0 mmol/L and 24.4 mmol/L, respectively. The concentration of olsalazine 2 g/day was 16.0 mmol/L. The concentration of the metabolite N-acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid (Ac-5-ASA) did not rise with increasing Pentasa dose, indicating saturable presystemic acetylating capacity of 5-ASA. Total urinary excretion of 5-ASA and Ac-5-ASA, as a percentage of the daily ingested 5-ASA dose, remained constant on the three Pentasa doses, but there was a significant increase in the 5-ASA fraction. Mean steady state plasma concentrations of 5-ASA and Ac-5-ASA were significantly higher on Pentasa 4 g/day and 6 g/day than on 2 g/day. Values on Pentasa 2 g/day were comparable with those on olsalazine 2 g/day. Conclusions: The study confirmed that 5-ASA is released from Pentasa in a predictable manner, the amount released increasing with dose. Olsalazine is an excellent generator of 5-ASA in the colon.     

Review article: increasing the dose of oral mesalazine therapy for active ulcerative colitis does not improve remission rates

BACKGROUND: Oral mesalazine (mesalamine, 5-aminosalicylic acid) formulations are effective in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis. All formulations contain the same active drug but differ with regard to mechanisms to deliver the drug to the colon. Patients who fail to respond to initial therapy are often administered higher doses of the same formulation. AIM: To review published trials of oral mesalazine formulations in treating active ulcerative colitis and to examine the effect of dose escalation on remission rates. RESULTS: Increasing the doses of oral mesalazine formulations does not result in higher remission rates, although increasing the doses of some formulations has been effective in increasing symptomatic improvement and/or response to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Because oral mesalazine formulations do not demonstrate a significant dose response with regard to induction of remission of active ulcerative colitis, simple dose escalation may not be the most effective course for patients who fail to respond to initial mesalazine treatment.     

Rectal and colonic mesalazine concentration in ulcerative colitis: oral vs. oral plus topical treatment

AIM: To measure mucosal concentrations of mesalazine in ulcerative colitis patients treated with oral mesalazine alone, compared to patients treated with both topical and oral mesalazine. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis were randomized to receive 2.4 g/day of oral mesalazine (11 patients) or 2.4 g/day oral plus 4 g/day of topical mesalazine (11 patients). After 2 weeks of treatment, endoscopic biopsies specimens were taken from the rectum and in descending colon just distal of the splenic flexure and stored to -80 degrees C for later assay (HPLC). Wilcoxon's rank sum test for unpaired data was used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: Mucosal levels of mesalazine in the rectum were significantly higher in patients who received oral plus topical treatment than in those who had oral treatment alone (52.1 ng/mg, range: 13.6-122.1 vs. 0.2 ng/mg, range: 0.2-9.7, respectively; P < 0.0001). Similarly, in the descending colon, the mucosal concentrations of mesalazine were significantly higher in patients who had oral plus topical treatment than in those receiving oral treatment alone (46.6 ng/mg, range: 6-112.6 vs. 15.9 ng/mg, range: 2.3-42.4, respectively; P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Topical treatment of mesalazine significantly increases mucosal concentrations of mesalazine up to the splenic flexure, supporting the rationale to treat left-sided ulcerative colitis with topical formulations of mesalazine.     

Systematic review: the pharmacokinetic profiles of oral mesalazine formulations and mesalazine pro-drugs used in the management of ulcerative colitis

AIM: : To quantify through systematic review the pharmacokinetic profiles of the oral delayed release and sustained release mesalazine (5-aminosalicylate, 5ASA) formulations (Asacol, Salofalk, Mesasal, Claversal, Pentasa) and pro-drugs (sulfasalazine, olsalazine, balsalazide) used in the management of ulcerative colitis. METHODS: : Selected articles had: (1) adult healthy volunteers or patients with ulcerative colitis and (2) quantification of pharmacokinetic data to include, at a minimum, urinary excretion of total 5ASA [5ASA plus N-Acetyl-5ASA (N-Ac-5ASA)]. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: : Pharmacokinetic data (Tmax, Cmax, AUC, urinary excretion, faecal excretion) of 5ASA, its major metabolite N-Acetyl-5ASA, total 5ASA, and the parent pro-drug compounds was extracted. MAIN RESULTS: : The summary results for urinary excretion of total 5ASA over 24-96 h in all subjects (either mean or median) were: sulfasalazine mean 11-33% or median 22%; olsalazine mean 14-31% or median 16-27%; balsalazide mean 12-35% or median 20%; Asacol mean 10-35% or median 18-40%; Pentasa mean 15-53% or median 23-34%; Salofalk, Mesasal and Claversal mean 27-56% or median 31-44%. The summary results for faecal excretion of total 5ASA over 24-96 h in all subjects (either mean or median) were: sulfasalazine mean 23-75% or median 38%; olsalazine mean 47-50% or median 17-36%; balsalazide mean 46% or median 22%; Asacol mean 40-64% or median 20-56%; Pentasa mean 12-51% or median 39-59%; Salofalk, Mesasal and Claversal mean 37-44% or median 23-35%. CONCLUSIONS: : The systemic exposure to 5ASA, as measured by urinary excretion of total 5ASA, and the faecal excretion of total 5ASA is comparable for all oral mesalazine formulations and pro-drugs. Thus, selection of a mesalazine therapy for the treatment of ulcerative colitis should be based on other factors such as efficacy, dose-response, toxicity of the parent compound and its metabolites, compliance issues related to dose forms and dosing schedules, and costs.     

Randomised clinical trial: early assessment after 2 weeks of high-dose mesalazine for moderately active ulcerative colitis - new light on a familiar question

Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011; 33: 1028–1035

Summary

Background Rapid resolution of rectal bleeding and stool frequency are important goals for ulcerative colitis therapy and may help guide therapeutic decisions. Aim To explore patient diary data from ASCEND I and II for their relevance to clinical decision making. Methods Data from two randomised, double‐blind, Phase III studies were combined. Patients received mesalazine (mesalamine) 4.8 g/day (Asacol 800 mg MR) or 2.4 g/day (Asacol 400 mg MR). Time to improvement or resolution of rectal bleeding and stool frequency was assessed and the proportion of patients experiencing symptom improvement or resolution at day 14 evaluated using survival analysis. Symptoms after 14 days were compared to week 6. A combination of prespecified and post hoc analyses were used. Results Median times to resolution and improvement of both rectal bleeding and stool frequency were shorter with 4.8 g/day than 2.4 g/day (resolution, 19 vs. 29 days, P = 0.020; improvement, 7 vs. 9 days, P = 0.024). In total, 73% of patients experienced improvement in both rectal bleeding and stool frequency by day 14 with 4.8 g/day, compared to 61% with 2.4 g/day. More patients achieved symptom resolution by day 14 with 4.8 g/day than 2.4 g/day (43% vs. 30%; P = 0.035). Symptom relief after 14 days was associated with a high rate of symptom relief after 6 weeks. Conclusions High‐dose mesalazine 4.8 g/day provides rapid relief of the cardinal symptoms of moderately active ulcerative colitis. Symptom relief within 14 days was associated with symptom relief at 6 weeks in the majority of patients. Day 14 is a practical timepoint at which response to treatment may be assessed and decisions regarding therapy escalation made (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00577473, NCT00073021).