Ticagrelor: a P2Y12 antagonist for use in acute coronary syndromes

Agents that inhibit platelet function are used routinely in the treatment and prevention of acute coronary syndromes. The main antiplatelet treatments used combine aspirin with one of the thienopyridine P2Y(12) antagonists, either clopidogrel or prasugrel. By blocking the synthesis of thromboxane A(2) in platelets and by blocking the effects of ADP, respectively, these agents reduce platelet activity, platelet aggregation and thrombus formation. Ticagrelor (marketed by AstraZeneca as Brilinta? in the USA, and as Brilique(?) or Possia(?) in Europe) is a cyclopentyl-triazolo-pyrimidine, a new chemical class of P2Y(12) antagonist that is now approved for use in the wide spectrum of acute coronary syndromes. In this article we provide an overview of ticagrelor. We discuss the differences in mode of action compared with other P2Y(12) antagonists, examine its pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic and safety profile, and summarize the various clinical trials that have provided information on its efficacy in combination with aspirin. Ticagrelor appears to overcome some of the difficulties that have been encountered with other antiplatelet treatments, clopidogrel in particular.     

Ticagrelor: a P2Y12 antagonist for use in acute coronary syndromes

Agents that inhibit platelet function are used routinely in the treatment and prevention of acute coronary syndromes. The main antiplatelet treatments used combine aspirin with one of the thienopyridine P2Y₁₂ antagonists, either clopidogrel or prasugrel. By blocking the synthesis of thromboxane A₂ in platelets and by blocking the effects of ADP, respectively, these agents reduce platelet activity, platelet aggregation and thrombus formation. Ticagrelor (marketed by AstraZeneca as Brilinta? in the USA, and as Brilique^® or Possia^® in Europe) is a cyclopentyl-triazolo-pyrimidine, a new chemical class of P2Y₁₂ antagonist that is now approved for use in the wide spectrum of acute coronary syndromes. In this article we provide an overview of ticagrelor. We discuss the differences in mode of action compared with other P2Y₁₂ antagonists, examine its pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic and safety profile, and summarize the various clinical trials that have provided information on its efficacy in combination with aspirin. Ticagrelor appears to overcome some of the difficulties that have been encountered with other antiplatelet treatments, clopidogrel in particular.     

抗血小板药物替格瑞洛药代药效动力学及遗传药理学研究进展

替格瑞洛是2010年批准上市的抗血小板新药,属于新型环戊基三唑嘧啶类（CPTP）口服P2Y12受体拮抗剂。替格瑞洛口服后迅速吸收,中位达峰时间约1．5h。与已有P2Y12受体拮抗剂氯吡格雷和普拉格雷相比,替格瑞洛具有显著优势：无需代谢激活故起效迅速;与P2Y12受体呈可逆性结合,故停药后血小板功能恢复较快。此外,替格瑞洛可以通过抑制非血小板细胞表面的P2Y12受体从而产生其他药理学作用。替格瑞洛的药动学特征不受年龄、性别、饮食以及对氯吡格雷反应性的影响。替格瑞洛主要经CYP3A4代谢,可迅速产生血药浓度依赖的血小板抑制作用,且对氯吡格雷抵抗的患者同样有效。更重要的是,替格瑞洛的抗血小板作用不受具有多态性的药物转运体（ABCBl）和代谢酶（CYP2C19）基因型的影响。本文主要概述替格瑞洛药动学、药效学以及遗传药理学方面的研究进展。     

Ticagrelor: a review of its use in the management of acute coronary syndromes

Ticagrelor (Brilique?; Brilinta?), a cyclopentyl-triazolo-pyrimidine antiplatelet agent, is the first oral antagonist of the P2Y(12) receptor to offer reversible receptor binding. It is indicated in the EU for the prevention of atherothrombotic events in adults with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) [unstable angina pectoris, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI] or non-STEMI), including those managed medically or with percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Ticagrelor provides selective and reversible inhibition of adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation, with a faster onset and offset of action than that of clopidogrel, and is effective in the treatment of patients with ACS, with or without ST-segment elevation. In the large, randomized, double-blind, multicentre PLATO trial conducted in this patient population, ticagrelor was more effective than clopidogrel in terms of preventing ischaemic events over 12 months, providing a significantly lower risk of the primary composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, stroke or death from vascular causes, and was associated with an overall mortality benefit. The risk of major bleeding with ticagrelor, including bleeds related to CABG, did not differ from that seen with clopidogrel in this study, although ticagrelor was associated with more non-CABG-related major bleeds and fatal intracranial bleeding, albeit the latter bleeding events were rare. Further long-term and comparative efficacy and tolerability data are required to definitively position ticagrelor with respect to other antiplatelet agents, including prasugrel. However, the clinical data currently available indicate that ticagrelor is a promising option for the treatment of patients with ACS and may be of particular use in those at high risk of ischaemic events or unresponsive to clopidogrel.     

Ticagrelor for the treatment of arterial thrombosis

Importance of the field: High platelet reactivity has been linked to recurrent ischemic events in patients treated with conventional dual antiplatelet therapy, in patients with arterial diseases and particularly in patients treated with coronary artery stenting. The limitations of clopidogrel have served as a major rationale for the development of new P2Y₁₂ blockers that have superior pharmacodynamic profiles uninfluenced by concomitant therapies or specific genotypes. Ticagrelor is the first direct-acting reversibly binding oral P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonist. Extensive Phase II investigations have addressed the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety-related properties of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel. The recently completed PLATO trial demonstrated promise for ticagrelor as a major treatment strategy for a wide spectrum of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Ticagrelor is now being reviewed by the FDA as a P2Y₁₂ receptor blocker to treat patients with coronary artery disease and, once accepted, will be in widespread use as an antiplatelet agent. Thus, it is both appropriate and timely to review available data and provide a comprehensive review of ticagrelor.

Areas covered in this review: We discuss the rationale for the development of ticagrelor, a reversible and potent P2Y₁₂ receptor blocker. The data regarding ticagrelor based on preclinical and clinical studies are examined. We researched articles about ‘AZD6140’ and ‘ticagrelor’ in PubMed from 2006 to 2010 and also reviewed data presented at recent cardiology meetings.

What the reader will gain: This is an updated and comprehensive review of ticagrelor. The advantages and disadvantages of ticagrelor and available P2Y₁₂ receptor blockers such as clopidogrel and prasugrel are discussed, thus providing a clear picture to readers.

Take home message: Ticagrelor has an important role as an antiplatelet agent in the settings of acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention and once accepted will be in widespread use.     

Platelet hyperreactivity and stent thrombosis in patients undergoing coronary stenting

Stent thrombosis (ST) is a rare but very serious event complicating percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures. Both procedure- and patient-related factors, including inadequate platelet inhibition are well known predictors of ST. According to the present guidelines, a dual antiplatelet treatment regimen consisting of aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor such as clopidogrel, prasugrel or ticagrelor is routinely administered to ACS patients and to patients undergoing PCI in order to prevent thrombotic vessel occlusions. In recent years, evidence has grown that patients showing high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) under clopidogrel intake exhibit a higher risk for the occurrence of ischemic events including ST. For assessing HPR, different platelet function assays are currently available and have already found their way into routine clinical practice in several centers. Along with this development, more potent P2Y12 receptor inhibitors like prasugrel and ticagrelor are substitutes for clopidogrel in specific circumstances such as in ACS patients or in patients who do not adequately respond to standard clopidogrel treatment. Utilizing platelet function monitoring, patients showing HPR can be identified and an optimized antiplatelet treatment regime can be tailored for these patients. This review paper aims to summarize the important facts in relation to ST and antiplatelet therapy with a particular focus on P2Y12 receptor inhibition and its ex vivo assessment in patients undergoing coronary stent placement.     

新型抗血小板药替卡格雷

替卡格雷为第一个可逆结合的、直接起效的、口服给药的血小板二磷酸腺苷P2Y12受体拮抗剂,比氯吡格雷起效更快,对血小板凝集的抑制作用更强。2011年7月20日,美国FDA批准替卡格雷用于降低急性冠脉综合征(acute coronary syndrome,ACS)患者的血栓性心血管事件的发生率。与氯吡格雷相比,替卡格雷起效更快,对血小板聚集的抑制作用更强,能显著降低心血管死亡、心肌梗死或卒中的发生率。在有效治疗的同时,替卡格雷并未显著增加主要出血事件的发生率。联合用药时,阿司匹林的维持剂量应为75～100 mg.d-1。本文对替卡格雷药理学特性、临床价值及不良反应进行综述。     

Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of platelet adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonists and their clinical implications

Over the last two decades or more, anti-platelet therapy has become established as a cornerstone in the treatment of patients with ischaemic cardiovascular disease, since such drugs effectively reduce arterial thrombotic events. The original agent used in this context was aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) but, with the advent of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonists, the use of dual anti-platelet therapy has resulted in further improvement in cardiovascular outcomes when compared with aspirin alone. The first group of platelet ADP receptor antagonists to be developed was the thienopyridine class, which comprise inactive pro-drugs that require in vivo metabolism to their active metabolites before exerting their inhibitory effect on the P2Y(12) receptor. Clopidogrel has been the principal ADP receptor antagonist in use over the past decade, but is limited by variability in its in vivo inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA). The pharmacokinetics of clopidogrel are unpredictable due to their vulnerability to multiple independent factors including genetic polymorphisms. Expression of the 3435T/T genetic variant encoding the MDR1 gene for the P-glycoprotein efflux transporter results in a significantly reduced maximum drug concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve as intestinal absorption of clopidogrel is reduced; and the expression of the mutant *2 allele of CYP2C19 results in similar pharmacokinetic effects as the two cytochrome P450 (CYP)-mediated steps required for the production of the active metabolite of clopidogrel are impaired. These variable pharmacokinetics lead to erratic pharmacodynamics and cannot reliably be overcome with increased dosing. Both prasugrel, a third-generation thienopyridine, and ticagrelor, a cyto-pentyl-triazolo-pyrimidine, have more predictable pharmacokinetics and enhanced pharmacodynamics than clopidogrel. Neither appears to be affected by the same genetic polymorphisms as clopidogrel; prasugrel requires only a single CYP-mediated step to produce its active metabolite and ticagrelor is not a pro-drug. Enhanced IPA by both prasugrel and ticagrelor is achieved at the expense of increased major bleeding, although this is partially mitigated in the case of ticagrelor due to its reversible IPA. However, the reversible binding of ticagrelor to the P2Y(12) receptor requires a twice-daily dosing regimen. Due to limited data from clinical studies, the use of prasugrel is currently restricted to individuals undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention who are ≤75 years old and have a body weight ≥60 kg. The clinical data for ticagrelor are more comprehensive and this drug therefore has a place in the management of patients with acute coronary syndrome at moderate-to-high risk of ischaemic events, irrespective of treatment strategy. Here we review in detail the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor, and explore the implications of the differences in these parameters for their clinical use.     

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ticagrelor in the treatment of cardiac ischemia

Introduction: After acute coronary syndromes (ACS), the so-called dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), which usually consists of low-dose of aspirin in combination with a thienopyridine (clopidogrel, prasugrel) or with a cyclopentyltriazolopyrimidine (ticagrelor), reduces the risk of ischemic events. Ticagrelor, un particular, is an effective drug as it isn’ a prodrug, doesn’t require metabolic activation and demonstrates a rapid onset and faster offset of action.

Areas covered: This article evaluates the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety and tolerability of ticagrelor during DAPT after ACS and its potential use beyond the canonical twelve months after PCI. The review discusses studies comparing: ticagrelor and clopidogrel (DISPERSE, DISPERSE-2, PLATO, RESPOND Trial, ONSET/OFFSET Trials), ticagrelor and placebo (PEGASUS TIMI 54 Trial).

Expert opinion: For ACS patients, the PLATO trial showed that ticagrelor was superior to clopidogrel in the reduction of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke. PEGASUS TIMI 54 showed that patients in whom ischemic events and cardiovascular death outweigh the risk of life-threatening bleeding, may benefit from prolonged ticagrelor-based dual antiplatelet therapy, over 12 months. This strategy has been recently approved by the ACC/AHA guidelines. Further studies are needed to evaluate and eventually validate the role of the prolonged DAPT in patients treated with new generation stents.     

Thienopyridines and Other ADP-Receptor Antagonists

Platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibition plays a pivotal role in preventing thrombotic vascular events in patients with ACS and in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Among the P2Y12 receptor inhibitors, the group of thienopyridines include ticlopidine, clopidogrel and prasugrel, all of which are orally administered prodrugs leading to irreversible P2Y12 receptor inhibition. Non-thienopyridine derivatives including ticagrelor, cangrelor and elinogrel do not require metabolic activation and lead to a reversible P2Y12 receptor inhibition in contrast to thienopyridines. The extend of platelet inhibition is subject to the administered antiplatelet agent and influenced by individual genetic and clinical factors. Insufficient platelet inhibition, termed high platelet reactivity (HPR) is associated with an increased risk for ischemic events after PCI whereas exceeding platelet inhibition results in an increased bleeding risk. Pharmacologic properties and clinical outcome data differ substantially between the existing P2Y12 receptor inhibitors. Whether individualized antiplatelet treatment incorporating different P2Y12 receptor inhibitors improves patients' clinical outcomes warrants further investigation.     

Ticagrelor Compared with Clopidogrel Increased Adenosine and Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate Plasma Concentration in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients

Ticagrelor produces a more potent antiplatelet effect than clopidogrel and inhibits cellular uptake of adenosine, which is associated with several cardiovascular consequences. We aimed to explore the correlation between adenosine and cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) plasma concentration and antiplatelet effect by clopidogrel or ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). We conducted a prospective, observational and single‐centre cohort study enrolling 68 patients with non‐ST‐segment elevation ACS from January 2016 to May 2016. We monitored the inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) and assessed adenosine, adenosine deaminase (ADA) and cAMP plasma concentrations by immunoassay on admission and 48 hr after coronary angiography. The demographic and clinical data were collected by reviewing their medical records. The two groups exhibited similar baseline characteristics including adenosine, ADA and cAMP. The mean IPA in patients receiving ticagrelor was significantly higher than that in patients receiving clopidogrel (93.5% versus 67.2%; p = 0.000). Also, we observed that patients treated with ticagrelor had a significantly higher increase in levels of adenosine and cAMP compared with those treated with clopidogrel (1.04 (0.86; 1.41) versus 0.04 (?0.25; 0.26); p = 0.029 and 0.78 (?1.67; 1.81) versus 0.60 (?1.91; 4.60); p = 0.037, respectively). And there was a weak correlation between IPA and adenosine as well as cAMP plasma concentration (r = 0.390, p = 0.001 and r = 0.335, p = 0.005, respectively). Ticagrelor increased adenosine and cAMP plasma concentration compared with clopidogrel in patients with ACS.     

Prediction of Ticagrelor and its Active Metabolite in Liver Cirrhosis Populations Using a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model Involving Pharmacodynamics

Ticagrelor, a P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonist, has been highly recommended for use in acute coronary syndrome. The major active metabolite (AM) is similar to the parent drug, which exhibits antiplatelet activity. The inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) is used as an assay to demonstrate the anticoagulant efficacy of ticagrelor. In this study, we developed a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to predict the pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor and its AM and combined this model with a pharmacodynamics model to reflect potential pharmacodynamic alterations in liver cirrhosis populations. The simulated results obtained using the PBPK model were validated by fold error values, which were all smaller than 2. Comparisons of exposure in different classifications of liver cirrhosis indicated that exposure to ticagrelor increased significantly with an increase in the degree of cirrhosis severity, whereas exposure to AM was decreased. The total concentration of ticagrelor and AM was related to the IPA included in the Sigmoid E_max model. The PBPK model of ticagrelor and AM could predict the pharmacokinetics of all populations, and a combination of PD models was used to extrapolate for predicting unknown scenarios. Liver cirrhosis may result in prolonged IPA, depending on the severity degree of this disease. The combined PBPK model including IPA can reveal changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in populations affected by liver cirrhosis and indicate the risk potential.     

Emerging antiplatelet therapy for coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndrome

Antiplatelet therapy is used widely with proven benefit for the prevention of further ischemic cardiac complications in patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD) and a history of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The limitations of conventional antiplatelet therapy with aspirin, clopidogrel, or prasugrel, as well as the fact that rates of recurrent ischemic events still remain high with use of these agents, underscore the need to investigate alternate agents that may further reduce event rates while limiting bleeding risk. The selection of antiplatelet therapy is further influenced by the following: ticagrelor was approved in July 2011 by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and clopidogrel is slated to become available as a generic productin 2012. We provide an overview of emerging agents for the treatment of CAD and ACS, including the reversible P2Y(12) antagonists ticagrelor, cangrelor, and elinogrel, and a new class of oral protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) inhibitors, vorapaxar and atopaxar.The recently approved P2Y(12) antagonists prasugrel and ticagrelor demonstrate enhanced ability to prevent adverse cardiac outcomes. However, this comes at a cost of a potential increased risk of bleeding. New adverse effects have also emerged, including dyspnea for all of the reversible P2Y(12) antagonists (ticagrelor, cangrelor, and elinogrel) and ventricular pauses for ticagrelor. In addition, the newer P2Y(12) antagonists have a faster onset and offset. Two of these agents, cangrelor and elinogrel, are available as intravenous formulations, which may provide additional benefits in patients who undergo coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Trials with the PAR-1 inhibitors have also shown trends toward reductions in cardiac events, but not without the possibility of increased bleeding. More than ever, as the arsenal of antiplatelet therapy expands, health care providers need to understand the pharmacologic and pharmacodynamic differences between conventional and emerging antiplatelet therapies for patients with ACS and CAD. Health care providers must also carefully assess patient-specific factors such as risk of thrombosis, concomitant disease states, age, drug adherence, and aspirin dose, and plan for those patients who will be undergoing CABG when selecting antiplatelet therapy in order to optimally balance bleeding and thrombosis risk.     

ADP Receptor Antagonism

ADP is one of the most important mediators of both physiologic hemostasis and thrombosis. Development and utilization of agents that block ADP receptors on the platelet membrane, namely thienopyridines, has represented a major advancement for treatment of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions and those with acute coronary syndromes. Currently, clopidogrel, a second-generation thienopyridine that inhibits the ADP P2Y(12) receptor, represents the treatment of choice, in addition to aspirin, for the prevention of stent thrombosis. Further, long-term adjunctive use of this ADP P2Y(12) receptor antagonist is also associated with improved clinical outcomes in high-risk patients, and represents the standard of care for these patients. Despite the unambiguous clinical benefit associated with clopidogrel, accumulating experience with this drug has also led to identification of some of its drawbacks, which are related to inadequate platelet inhibition with standard dosage regimens as well as to its irreversible antiplatelet effects. This has led to the questioning of currently recommended clopidogrel dosage regimens as well as to the development of novel and more potent ADP P2Y(12) receptor antagonists, some of which are also reversible agents. Numerous studies are currently ongoing with the objective of demonstrating how more potent platelet inhibition using higher loading and maintenance dose regimens of clopidogrel or novel ADP P2Y(12) receptor antagonists - such as prasugrel, ticagrelor (AZD 6140) and cangrelor - will affect clinical outcomes. This article reviews the current knowledge of platelet ADP P2Y(12) receptor antagonism and the projected developments in this field.     

Beyond efficacy: pharmacokinetic differences between clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor

INTRODUCTION: Clinical nonresponse to clopidogrel has been associated with variability in response. This has led to the development of other P2Y12 receptor inhibitors, such as prasugrel and ticagrelor, with different pharmacokinetic characteristics that influence their pharmacodynamics. AREAS COVERED: Clopidogrel response variability is attributable to its complex pharmacokinetics and is vulnerable to genetic polymorphisms in genes involved in absorption, metabolism and drug-drug interactions (i.e., proton pump inhibitors). Prasugrel which has a simpler metabolism, leading to greater bioavailability, seems to be less affected by genetic or drug-drug interactions and achieves a greater antiplatelet effect. Ticagrelor is the most novel compound approved with a simpler metabolism. Both prasugrel and ticagrelor reached their antiplatelet effect faster and to a much greater extent than clopidogrel. All these differences observed in kinetics explain, to some degree, the efficacy and safety profile observed in clinical trials for these molecules associated with other antiplatelet agents (aspirin, gpIIb/IIIa inhibitors) and anticoagulants. EXPERT OPINION: Clopidogrel is still the best standard of care. However, the pharmacokinetic advantages of both prasugrel and ticagrelor allow clinicians to center patient management by selecting the best drug for the appropriate subject.     

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of ticagrelor in volunteers with mild hepatic impairment

Ticagrelor, a P2Y?? receptor antagonist that inhibits ADP-induced platelet aggregation (IPA), has demonstrated improved outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes compared with clopidogrel. Because ticagrelor undergoes extensive hepatic elimination, this study evaluated the effect of mild hepatic impairment on its pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety. A single oral 90-mg ticagrelor dose was administered to volunteers with and without hepatic impairment (10 with Child-Pugh class A; 10 with normal liver function). Absorption of ticagrelor and formation of its active metabolite, AR-C124910XX, were rapid in both groups. Ticagrelor exposure was higher in hepatically impaired volunteers (maximum concentration [C(max)] 12%; area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity [AUC] 23%) compared with controls. AR-C124910XX exposure was also higher in hepatic impairment (C(max) 17%; AUC 66%). Ticagrelor is highly protein bound (>99.8%); the unbound fraction in plasma was comparable in volunteers with hepatic impairment and controls. Overall, IPA parameters were not significantly different between groups, and similar IPA-concentration profiles were observed. Ticagrelor was well tolerated in both groups, and no adverse events were reported. In conclusion, mild hepatic impairment resulted in modestly higher exposure to ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX, without subsequent effects on pharmacodynamics or tolerability. Based on these data, no ticagrelor dosage adjustment is needed in patients with mild hepatic impairment.     

Efficacy and safety of ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a dangerous and urgent clinical pattern of coronary artery disease. Aspirin and adenosine diphosphate P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonists are the standard dual anti‐platelet therapy for patients with ACS. Ticagrelor is a new oral antagonist of the adenosine diphosphate P2Y₁₂ receptor. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel or prasugrel in patients with ACS, obtaining conflicting results. Thus, we conducted a meta‐analysis of these RCTs to determine the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor in patients with ACS. Results of the meta‐analysis indicate that ticagrelor decreased the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all‐cause death, but increased the risk of bleeding events. In Asiatic patients, analysis indicates that ticagrelor did not decrease the risk of MACE and all‐cause death, while increasing the risk of bleeding events. Together, this meta‐analysis suggests that ticagrelor was more effective, but less safe than clopidogrel and prasugrel in patients with ACS. Subgroup analysis indicates that ticagrelor was not more effective, although less safe than clopidogrel in Asiatic patients, thus more evidence is needed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor in Asiatic patients.     

Prasugrel hydrochloride for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes

Introduction: P2Y12 receptor antagonists, by inhibiting platelet activation and subsequent aggregation, are critical to prevent ischemic event recurrence after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Prasugrel is a third-generation thienopyridine whose metabolites target the P2Y12 receptor. Compared with clopidogrel, prasugrel has a more potent, faster in onset, and more consistent P2Y12 receptor inhibition.

Areas covered: This review describes prasugrel chemistry, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and clinical studies. In a Phase III randomized clopidogrel-controlled trial, prasugrel improved cardiovascular outcome (risk reduction of cardiovascular death, non-fatal heart attack and non-fatal stroke) at the cost of increased major and fatal bleeding complications. Prasugrel, in combination with aspirin, has been approved by European and American regulatory agencies for the prevention of atherothrombotic events in patients with ACS who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Expert opinion: Prasugrel is effective for managing ACS patients with planned PCI and it offers an alternative with potential benefits over clopidogrel. Prasugrel is currently challenged by ticagrelor, a P2Y12 receptor antagonist with different pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties. The superiority of one drug to the other cannot be reliably estimated from the current trials. Ongoing randomized and observational studies may help to provide valuable information on the safety and efficacy of these two drugs and their respective places with ACS patients.     

Ticagrelor in ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Ticagrelor is a new oral antagonist of the platelet P2Y12 receptor that offers several potential advantages compared to clopidogrel including faster and more effective inhibition of platelet aggregation. Ticagrelor has been compared to clopidogrel in the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial in a broad population of patients with acute coronary syndrome showing a reduction of the 12-month risk of death from vascular causes, myocardial infarction and stroke without increasing the overall risk of major bleeding. In a subanalysis of the PLATO trial focusing on patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, ticagrelor results were consistent with those of the overall trial. Additionally, possible pleiotropic effects of ticagrelor, including an appealing interaction with adenosine, might constitute a specific advantage in this particular subset of patients.     

根据血小板活性检测指导个体化用药的成本-效用分析

目的：评估急性冠状动脉综合征（acute coronary syndrome,ACS）患者接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗（percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI）术后使用血小板活性检测系统——VerifyNow P2Y12指导氯吡格雷或替格瑞洛应用的成本-效用。方法：患者年龄≥ 55岁,部分接受氯吡格雷或替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林治疗1年,部分在双联抗血小板治疗（dual antiplatelet therapy,DAPT）前接受VerifyNow P2Y12检测,并根据活性检测结果再选择氯吡格雷或替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林治疗1年。由此建立决策树及Markov模型并进行成本-效用分析,评价开展血小板活性检测的成本-效用。结果：与直接使用氯吡格雷相比,指导下的DAPT每年可以在每1 000名患者中减少5次心梗和4次死亡。指导下的个体化治疗,每名患者的总成本预测值比所有患者都使用替格瑞洛时低32%。单因素敏感性分析与概率敏感性分析的结果与基础分析的结果一致。结论：制订DAPT方案前,使用VerifyNow P2Y12评估血小板活性以实施个体化用药是一种具备成本-效用的策略,与直接使用替格瑞洛相比可减轻经济负担。