Effect of digoxin on sinus nodal reentry in the dog

The effect of digoxin on sinus nodal reentry was examined in 20 open chest mongrel dogs during infusion of digoxin at a rate of 2.5 μg/kg per min. The extrinsic cardiac nerve supply was removed acutely in 10 dogs and was left intact in the remaining 10 dogs. Sinus nodal reentry was relatively unaffected by digoxin in 18 of 20 dogs. In these 18 dogs, digitalis toxicity developed before reentry was abolished and was manifested as increased atrial and ventricular automaticity in 14 and as advanced atrioventricular (A-V) block in four. In the remaining two dogs, sinus nodal reentry was relatively sensitive to digoxin and was abolished before toxicity became manifest as advanced A-V block. The knowledge of the relative insensitivity of sinus nodal reentry to digoxin, at least in this experimental model, contrasts with the previously reported sensitivity of sinus nodal reentry to quinidine, and may be important in the management of sinus nodal reentry in man.     

Reentrant ventricular arrhythmias in the late myocardial infarction period. 12. Spontaneous versus induced reentry and intramural versus epicardial circuits

One to 5 days after one-stage ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery in dogs, reentrant excitation can be induced by programmed premature stimulation in the surviving electrophysiologically abnormal, thin epicardial layer overlying the infarct. In experiments in four dogs, reentrant excitation occurred "spontaneously" during a regular sinus or atrial rhythm. A tachycardia-dependent Wenckebach conduction sequence in a potentially reentrant pathway was the initiating mechanism for spontaneous reentrant tachycardias and was the basis for both manifest and concealed reentrant extrasystolic rhythms. In all dogs showing spontaneous reentry, reentrant excitation could also be induced by premature stimulation at cycle lengths much shorter than those associated with spontaneous reentry, and induced reentrant circuits were always different from those during spontaneous reentry. In two dogs, the reentrant circuit was located intramurally in close proximity to a patchy septal infarction. The study illustrates that irrespective of the anatomic localization of reentrant circuits (epicardial or intramural), their dimension (large or small) or their mechanism of initiation (programmed premature stimulation or "spontaneous"), reentrant excitation always occurred in a figure 8 configuration (or a modification thereof). The figure 8 model, rather than the ring model or the leading circle model, may be the common model of reentry in the mammalian heart.     

Pacing techniques in the management of supraventricular tachycardias. Part 2. An implanted atrial synchronous pacemaker with a short atrioventricular delay for the prevention of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias.

An implanted atrial synchronous pacemaker with an atrioventricular delay of 30 msec is described. This pacemaker was implanted into a patient with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia due to an intra AV nodal reciprocal mechanism. The pacemaker was able to trigger from atrial potentials following atrial premature beats down to a coupling time of 300 msec. Following each triggering atrial potential, a ventricular stimulus was applied 30 msec later thereby producing a ventricular premature beat in response to each sinus beat or each atrial premature beat. Retrograde conduction from this atrial premature beat blocked the re-entry mechanism within the AV node and prevented the initiation of tachycardia. A detailed discussion on all parameters of function of this pacemaker is presented.     

Characteristics, Circuit, Mechanism, and Ablation of Reentry in the Rabbit Atrioventricular Node

INTRODUCTION: The circuitry underlying AV nodal reentry remains debated. We developed a model of AV nodal reentry and assessed the role of nodal inputs, compact node, and its posterior nodal extension (PNE) in this phenomenon. METHODS AND RESULTS: A fine scanning of short coupling interval range with an atrial premature beat consistently initiated slow-fast AV nodal reentrant beats that occurred 37+/-31 msec (mean+/-SD) after His-bundle activation in 11 of 16 consecutive rabbit heart preparations. The repeated testing (>40 times) of a chosen coupling interval within reentry window (6+/-9 msec, n = 11) yielded reentrant intervals that varied by 2+/-1 msec (mean SD for 40 beats+/-SD, n = 11). The breakthrough point of reentrant activation, as assessed from four perinodal sites, varied in different preparations from diffuse (4) to anterior (1), medial (3), or posterior (3); mean reentrant interval did not differ between perinodal sites. Antegrade perinodal activation pattern did not differ at reentrant versus nonreentrant coupling intervals and thus was not a primary determinant of reentry. A PNE ablation (n = 4) interrupted the slow pathway conduction and prevented reentry without affecting antegrade perinodal activation or fast pathway conduction. CONCLUSION: A reproducible model of AV nodal reentrant beats was developed and used to study underlying circuitry. The AV nodal reentry involves unaltered antegrade perinodal activation, slow PNE conduction and retrograde broad invasion of perinodal tissues starting at a preparation-dependent breakthrough point. A PNE ablation abolishes the reentry.     

Reentrant ventricular arrhythmias in the late myocardial infarction period. II. Burst pacing versus multiple premature stimulation in the induction of reentry

Isochronal maps of ventricular activation were analyzed in dogs 1 to 5 days after infarction utilizing a 64 channel multiplexer. Only dogs in which circus movement reentry could not be induced by a single premature stimulus were analyzed. Reentrant rhythms could be successfully induced equally by multiple (double or triple) premature stimuli and by burst pacing. Successive premature stimuli as well as successive beats during burst pacing resulted in progressively longer arcs of functional conduction block or slower circulating wave fronts, or both, that succeeded in reexciting myocardial zones on the proximal side of the arc of block to initiate reentry. However, for manifest reentry to be induced by burst pacing, the paced run had to be terminated after the beat that resulted in a critical degree of conduction delay. Otherwise, reentrant activation could be confined (concealed) by the subsequent paced wave front, which could also arrive earlier to the reentrant circuit zone of slow conduction resulting in block and interruption of reentry. Termination of a paced run after this beat would not result in reentry. If the paced run was extended past this beat, a new sequence of ventricular activation patterns characterized by progressively longer arcs of block or slower conduction, or both, developed again. The number of beats in a paced run that could initiate reentry varied with the cycle length of pacing, as well as in different experiments, and was difficult to standardize. It is therefore concluded that random burst pacing as a technique for induction of reentrant rhythms should probably be abandoned in favor of multiple premature stimulation.     

Sinus nodal echoes. Clinical case report and canine studies

Sinus nodal echoes are illustrated in (1) a case report, and (2) a study of the effects of atrial premature beats after atrial drive in dogs. When atrial premature beats confront the sinus node while it is still refractory, 3 types of response may be seen: (1) Complete interpolation—the subsequent sinus beat (or escape) comes precisely at the expected time; (2) incomplete interpolation—the subsequent sinus beat is delayed; and (3) sinus echoes—the sinus beat appears earlier than expected. In all 3 instances the node is entered, but the pacemaker fails to be reset. Although the echo has the form of a sinus beat, it is followed by a pause, presumably as a result of repenetration of the sinus node through pathways unused during exit. The curves characterizing the expansion by vagal stimulation of the nodal refractory period and total echo circuit time are defined, together with the latency of cholinergic effect on nodal refractoriness, sinus automaticity and exit conduction of the echo. The secondary concealment zone of a completely interpolated atrial premature beat is established. Atrial preexcitation (before the echo) sometimes evokes a second echo. The limiting factor on sustained sinoatrial reciprocation thus appears to be total echo circuit time rather than refractoriness of atrium or echo entrance pathways. The repetitive echoes seen in this study may be the basis for some clinical cases of sinus or atrial tachycardia.     

Initiation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in patients with discontinuous anterograde atrioventricular nodal conduction curves with and without documented supraventricular tachycardia: Observations on the role of a discontinuous retrograde conduction curve

To evaluate factors playing a role in initiation of atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia utilizing anterogradely a slow and retrogradely a fast conducting AV nodal pathway, 38 patients having no accessory pathways and showing discontinuous anterograde AV nodal conduction curves during atrial stimulation were studied. Twenty-two patients (group A) underwent an electrophysiologic investigation because of recurrent paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) that had been electrocardiographically documented before the study. Sixteen patients (group B) underwent the study because of a history of palpitations (15 patients) or recurrent ventricular tachycardia (one patient); in none of them had SVT ever been electrocardiographically documented before the investigation. Twenty-one of the 22 patients of group A demonstrated continuous retrograde conduction curves during ventricular stimulation. In 20 tachycardia was initiated by either a single atrial premature beat (18 patients) or by two atrial premature beats. Fifteen of the 16 patients of group B had discontinuous retrograde conduction curves during ventricular stimulation, with a long refractory period of their retrograde fast pathway. Tachycardia was initiated by multiple atrial premature beats in one patient. Thirteen out of the remaining 15 patients received atropine. Thereafter tachycardia could be initiated in three patients by a single atrial premature beat, by two atrial premature beats in one patient, and by incremental atrial pacing in another patient. In the remaining eight patients tachycardia could not be initiated. Our observations indicate that the pattern of ventriculoatrial conduction found during ventricular stimulation is a marker for ease of initiation of AV nodal tachycardia in patients with discontinuous anterograde AV nodal conduction curves.     

Sinus node pacemaker shift: a phenomenon induced by premature atrial stimulation in man?

The aim of this study was to investigate whether premature atrial stimulation is able to induce a shifting of the sinus node pacemaker. For this purpose we compared, in 18 patients, the curve of sinus node function obtained with Strauss' method with that resulting from the scanning, with premature atrial stimulation, of the first returning cycle following a single premature induced atrial beat. We found that the length of the compensatory phase (zone I) evaluated on the curve resulting from the scanning of the first returning cycle following the single premature induced atrial beat was shorter (15%) than that observed with the original Strauss method. In addition, an inverse relationship between the shortening of the compensatory zone and the estimated sinoatrial conduction time was observed. This result could be accounted for by one of the following explanations: 1) a change in the sinoatrial conduction or in the sinus pacemaker automaticity; 2) sinus node reentry; 3) sinus node pacemaker shift. Even if there is no direct evidence either to prove or to exclude one or more of these explanations, sinus node pacemaker shift seems to be the most convincing explanation.     

Mechanisms of cardiac arrhythmias after the Mustard operation for transposition of the great arteries

To determine the mechanisms of the cardiac arrhythmias frequently seen after the Mustard operation for transposition of the great arteries, intracardiac electrophysiologic studies were performed in 52 children 1 to 8 years after the Mustard operation. Sinus nodal automaticity as judged from the response to rapid atrial pacing was abnormal in 28 of the 52 children. Sinoatrial conduction (conduction of the sinus impulse to the atrium) was found to be abnormal in three of nine patients studied with the atrial extrastimulus method. Conduction of the sinus impulse from the high right atrium to the atrioventricular (A-V) node was abnormally delayed in only 2 of 41 subjects. The low lateral wall of the right atrium was depolarlzed late in 3 of 11 subjects (including the preceding 2). Two subjects showed delayed A-V nodal conduction and one delayed His-Purkinje conduction. The mechanism of supraventricular tachycardia induced in the laboratory was determined to be sinoatrial nodal reentry in four subjects and atrial muscle reentry in four. Two of the four with atrial muscle reentry had prolonged high right atrium to low lateral right atrium intervals during sinus rhythm.

Thus, damage to the sinus node remains the most common cause of arrhythmias after the Mustard operation. In addition, delayed atrial conduction may predispose to atrial muscle reentrant tachycardia.     

Concealed conduction and dual pathway physiology of the atrioventricular node

INTRODUCTION: Both concealed conduction and dual pathway physiology are important electrophysiologic characteristics of the AV node. The interaction of AV nodal concealment and duality, however, is not clearly understood. METHODS AND RESULTS: The properties of AV conduction curves in the presence and absence of a conditioning blocked impulse were prospectively studied during premature atrial stimulation in 20 patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia before and after slow pathway ablation and in 14 control patients. AV nodal duality in the control conduction curve in the absence of a conditioning impulse was observed in 19 (95%) of 20 patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. However, AV nodal duality in the modulated conduction curve in the presence of a blocked impulse was only identified in 2 (10%) of 20 patients (2/20 vs 19/20, P < 0.0001). The modulated curve was characterized by a significantly longer AV nodal effective and functional refractory periods compared to the control curve (P < 0.0001) in both patients with and without AV nodal reentry and in AV nodal reentry patients after successful slow pathway ablation. The maximum AH interval (AH(max)) of the modulated curve was significantly shorter than the control curve in both patients with (217 +/- 74 ms vs 347 +/- 55 ms, P < 0.0001) and without AV nodal reentry (178 +/- 50 ms vs 214 +/- 54 ms, P = 0.02). AH(max) of the control curve was significantly longer in AV nodal reentry patients than in controls (P < 0.0001). AH(max) of the modulated curve, however, was not significantly different between the two groups. After slow pathway ablation, AH(max) of the control curve was significantly reduced (347 +/- 55 ms vs 191 +/- 40 ms, P < 0.0001). Significant reduction in AH(max) of the modulated curve was not observed. CONCLUSION: An interaction of AV nodal concealed conduction and dual pathway physiology was demonstrated by our data. Slow pathway conduction of the AV node was prevented by the concealed beat in both patients with and without AV nodal reentry.     

Manifest Fast and Slow Pathway Conduction Patterns and Reentry in a Patient with Dual AV Nodal Physiology

Manifest Fast and Slow AV Nodal Conduction Patterns and Reentry. A 52-year-old woman with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias (PST) showed short and long PR intervals during sinus rhythm. Repetitive episodes of PST due to simultaneous anterograde conduction through fast and slow conduction pathways (one P-two QRS) were recorded. A self-limited episode of non-paroxysmal AV nodal reentry with anterograde slow and retrograde fast pathway conduction was initiated by a single atrial premature beat. Each pathway depicted distinct refractory periods, conduction velocities, unidirectional block, and Wenckebach-type block suggesting the possibility of a well-defined anatomical substratum.     

Initiation of two distinct forms of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia during programmed ventricular stimulation in man

Of 42 patients with supraventricular tachycardia related to dual atrioventricular (A-V) nodal pathway conduction, 8 had sustained tachycardia induced during programmed ventricular stimulation. The characteristics of the tachycardia in three patients suggested that the A-V nodal reentrant tachycardia used a slow pathway for anterograde conduction and a fast pathway for retrograde conduction (slow-fast form). In these patients, the retrograde effective refractory period was longer in the slow than in the fast pathway. Ventriculoatrial (V-A) conduction curves (V₁-V₂, A₁-A₂) were smooth. Ventricular premature beats, being conducted retrograde over the fast pathway, could activate the slow pathway in an anterograde direction, initiating the slow-fast form of A-V nodal reentrant tachycardia. In the remaining five patients, the tachycardia used a fast pathway for anterograde conduction and a slow pathway for retrograde conduction (fast-slow form). In these patients, the retrograde effective refractory period was longer in the fast than in the slow pathway. V-A conduction curves (V₁-V₂, A₁-A₂) could be either smooth or discontinuous if there was a sudden increase in V-A conduction time. Ventricular premature beats, conducted retrograde over the slow pathway, could activate the fast pathway in an anterograde direction, establishing a tachycardia circuit in reverse of the slow-fast form. In both groups of patients, the ventricular pacing cycle length appeared to be a crucial factor in the ability to expose functional discordance between the two A-V nodal pathways during retrograde conduction.The fast-slow form of A-V nodal reentrant tachycardia, similar to the slow-fast form, could also be induced during atrial premature stimulation in two patients. In this situation, the slow pathway having an anterograde effective refractory period longer, than that of the fast pathway was a requisite condition; anterograde A-V nodal conduction curves (A₁-A₂, H₁-H₂) were smooth. Atrial premature beats, conducted anterograde over the fast pathway, could activate the slow pathway in a retrograde direction resulting In an atrial echo or sustained fast-slow form of A-V nodal reentrant tachycardia.     

Longitudinal dissociation of Bachmann''s bundle as a mechanism of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia

A recent study has identified functional dissociation of atrial conduction in the genesis of sinus nodal reentry. The present study attempted to identify the spread of activation within Bachmann's bundle using the extrastimulus method in 17 dogs to provide further evidence for functional dissociation within or near Bachmann's bundle as a mechanism of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Premature stimuli were introduced in the high left atrium. In nine dogs of Group 1, recordings were obtained from the left atrial portion of Bachmann's bundle, high right atrium and both appendages. In six of the nine dogs achievement of critical delay in the interatrial conduction time (30 to 90 msec) resulted in echo beats with a similar activation sequence to that of high left atrial paced beats. In three of these six dogs the interatrial conduction time was abruptly increased from 25 to 50, 50 to 90 and 15 to 50 msec, respectively (with 10 msec decrements of coupling interval) at the critical coupling intervals, accounting for the discontinuous response curves. In another eight dogs (Group 2) Bachmann's bundle conduction was further studied with two additional recording electrodes impaled along Bachmann's bundle between the high right and high left atrial electrodes. Longitudinal dissociation of Bachmann's bundle was suggested by fragmentation of electrograms with initiation of a secondary wave. Induction and site of reentry appeared to be closely related to the appearance of fragmentation of the electrograms in the area of Bachmann's bundle.

It is concluded that (1) Bachmann's bundle could undergo functional dissociation as evidenced by fragmentation of electrograms and discontinuous curves, (2) Bachmann's bundle reentry should be considered one mechanism of supraventricular tachycardia, and (3) reentry within the sinus and atrioventricular nodes, intraatrial or Bachmann's bundle is indistinguishable without precise mapping of atrial activation.     

The mechanism of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia--PSVT due to peri-AV nodal reentry

To evaluate the role of perinodal tissue in the genesis of atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentry, echo beats were induced by programmed stimulation in nine superfused rabbit AV nodal preparations which included the crista terminalis (CT) input, interatrial septal (IAS) input and perinodal atrial tissues in addition to the AV node. Two patterns of AV reentry were observed: In six preparations, premature response was blocked within the AV node, but anterograde conduction continued along the perinodal fibers and entered the AV node by way of another input region. Reentry occurred via retrograde nodal conduction to the initial input and subsequently conducted within the perinodal region. In three preparations, premature beat elicited by CT stimulation was blocked in the perinodal tissues near the CT, conducted slowly in an anterograde fashion through the AV node. To complete the reentry circuit, it exited at the IAS region and conducted in retrograde fashion via the perinodal tissues to reenter the node at the CT. Moreover, in four other preparations, surgical interruption of the perinodal tissue prevented reinitiation of reentrant phenomena. Thus, the critical role of the perinodal tissues as a necessary link in AV nodal reentry was demonstrated in this preparation.     

Reentrant and nonreentrant mechanisms contribute to arrhythmogenesis during early myocardial ischemia: results using three-dimensional mapping

The present study assessed the mechanisms responsible for the initiation and maintenance of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) and ventricular tachycardia (VT) during early ischemia using a unique computerized mapping system capable of recording simultaneously from 232 individual intramural sites. In the chloralose-anesthetized cat, during normal sinus rhythm prior to ischemia, ventricular activation was rapid with a total activation time of 25 +/- 2 msec. Five minutes after occlusion of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery, activation was delayed during sinus rhythm (64 +/- 6 msec) (p less than 0.001 vs. control) and was characterized by slow conduction in the same plane and block in both the same plane and in the endocardial-to-epicardial direction. In 76% of cases (16 of 21), initiation of single PVCs and the first beat of VT occurred through intramural reentry. In all but one case, initiation occurred in the subendocardium, adjacent to the site of delayed subendocardial and midmyocardial activation of the preceding sinus beat. The activation time of the sinus beat preceding the PVC or VT was significantly prolonged (149 +/- 7 msec, p less than 0.001 vs. sinus beats during ischemia not followed by a PVC or VT) with most of the delayed activity occurring in the subendocardium and midmyocardium, a finding that would not have been apparent by epicardial mapping alone. The length of the reentrant pathway ranged from 1.8-3.0 cm. Marked delay was a necessary, but not a sufficient, condition for reentry to occur since, in some cases, delays as large as 220 msec was found without initiation of reentry or the occurrence of nonreentrant PVCs or VT. Maintenance of VT by intramural reentry arose in either the subendocardium or the subepicardium and was primarily dependent on the continued presence of marked transmural delay (159 +/- 8 msec). In contrast, in 24% of cases (5 of 21), initiation of the first beat of VT arose in either the subendocardium or subepicardium by a mechanism other than reentry as evidenced by the lack of intervening electrical activity between the end of the preceding sinus beat and the initiation of the ectopic beat. The preceding sinus beat was characterized by delay (129 +/- 12 msec) comparable to that of sinus beats preceding reentrant ectopic beats (p = NS), but the marked delay was distant from the site of nonreentrant initiation. Ventricular tachycardia could be initiated by one mechanism (reentrant or nonreentrant) and maintained or terminated by another mechanism.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Usefulness of the pre-excitation index to determine the mechanism of supraventricular paroxysmal tachycardia and the location of the anomalous pathway

To evaluate the preexcitation index in determinate the mechanism of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia and localize accessory pathway, fifty nine patients with clinical and electrocardiographic supraventricular tachycardia were analyzed. There were thirty eight patients (64.4%) with orthodromic AV reentry using an accessory pathway for retrograde conduction and 21 patients (35.6%) with typical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. Preexcitation of the atrium during tachycardia by premature ventricular complex at a time when anterograde His bundle activation was present in 30 o 38 (79%) patients with AV reentry while only 8 of 21 (38%) patients with AV nodal reentry demonstrated preexcitation during tachycardia. There was no significant difference between left and right accessory pathways and in mean tachycardia cycle length between the two groups. However, atrioventricular reentry demonstrated atrial preexcitation during tachycardia more frequently than AV nodal reentry. In conclusion, our findings show that the preexcitation index is a useful method for determinate the mechanism of supraventricular tachycardia and to localize accessory pathways.     

Alternative mechanisms of apparent supernormal atrioventricular conduction

Alternative mechanisms were found to explain several different electrocardiographic examples of apparent supernormal atrioventricular (A-V) conduction in man using programmed premature atrial and ventricular stimulation and His bundle recordings. Sudden shortening of the P-R interval during A-V nodal Wenckebach phenomenon was due to manifest or concealed reentry within the A-V node. Gap phenomena in which late atrial premature depolarizations blocked while earlier atrial premature depolarizations conducted were shown to result from delay of earlier atrial premature depolarizations in the A-V node (type I gap) or in the His-Purkinje system (type II gap). Mechanisms analogous to the latter were found in cases of apparent supernormality of intraventricular conduction: Late atrial premature depolarizations resulted in aberration whereas earlier atrial premature depolarizations conducted normally because of delay within the A-V node or His-Purkinje system. Unexpected normalization of a bundle branch block pattern also resulted from Wenckebach phenomenon in the bundle branches. Atypical Wenckebach phenomenon with the first beat of the period demonstrated that aberration was due to phase 4 depolarization. Preexcitation of the ventricle before the delivery of a previously blocked atrial premature depolarization allowed conduction through the area of block (A-V node) because of earlier depolarization of the latter with earlier recovery. In the His-Purkinje system, 2:1 A-V block was converted to 1:1 conduction when a premature ventricular depolarization shortened the refractoriness of the His-Purkinje system.     

Patients with two types of atrioventricular junctional (AV nodal) reentrant tachycardia. Evidence that a common pathway of nodal tissue is not present above the reentrant circuit

BACKGROUND. The site of the reentrant circuit in atrioventricular (AV) junctional reentrant tachycardia has not been defined; in particular, the existence of a common pathway of AV nodal tissue above the reentrant circuit is controversial. METHODS AND RESULTS. Two types of AV junctional reentrant tachycardia were induced in each of three patients at electrophysiological study. In one type of tachycardia (anterior), the onset of atrial activity occurred from 0 to 12 msec before the onset of ventricular activation, and earliest atrial activity was recorded near the His bundle. In the second type of tachycardia (posterior), the ventriculoatrial intervals were longer (76-168 msec), and earliest atrial activity was recorded near the mouth of the coronary sinus. In individual patients, the two types of tachycardia had different cycle lengths. Posterior AV junctional reentrant tachycardia was not a fast-slow form of AV junctional reentry in at least two of the three patients. Surgical cure was attempted in two patients. In one patient, anterior AV junctional reentrant tachycardia was abolished by dissection of the anterior perinodal atrium, but posterior AV junctional reentrant tachycardia could still be induced. At reoperation 4 months later, dissection of the posterior perinodal atrium abolished posterior AV junctional reentrant tachycardia while preserving AV conduction. CONCLUSION. Differences in ventriculoatrial intervals and cycle lengths and the results of selective surgery suggest that the two types of AV junctional reentrant tachycardia used different reentrant circuits. These observations imply that a common pathway of AV nodal tissue is not present above the reentrant circuit and suggest that perinodal atrium is part of these circuits.     

A second zone of compensation during atrial premature stimulation: Evidence for decremental conduction in the sinoatrial junction

125 consecutive patients with premature atrial stimulation were studied. Three demonstrated sinus node return cycles that were fully compensatory following premature atrial stimuli delivered early in diastole. This second zone of compensation was unaccompanied by significant alterations in the post-return cycle lengths or in P-wave morphology of the return cycle. To account for the occurrence of a complete compensatory pause following very early premature atrial depolarizations, we consider the possibility that retrograde conduction of the early atrial premature depolarization (APD) in the sinoatrial junction was delayed for a sufficient length of time to allow the sinus node to depolarize spontaneously on schedule. Collision between the APD and sinus beat would then occur despite the marked prematurity of the APD. Thus, the early APD had encountered the relative refractory period of the sinoatrial junction, suggesting that decrementai conduction takes place within the sinoatrial region in man. These findings imply that there is the potential for reentry in the region of the human sinoatrial junction.     

High-frequency stimulation in the prevention of atrioventricular tachycardias: relation to stimulation site and location of the accessory conduction pathway

To assess the validity of train stimulation for the prevention of accessory pathway mediated atrioventricular tachycardia, thirteen patients were studied. Tachycardia was induced from high right atrium and coronary sinus by means of single extrastimuli; preventive stimulation at high right atrium and coronary sinus consisted of the delivery of a train of ten or eleven stimuli 10 ms apart, following the tachycardia initiating stimulus. Preventive train stimulation at the site of tachycardia induction was successful in all patients when the train exceeded the atrial effective refractory period of the initiating stimulus to achieve single atrial capture within the "preventive zone". In patients with a left-sided accessory pathway in whom tachycardia was induced from the coronary sinus, preventive stimulation at high right atrium failed because of interatrial conduction delay. It is concluded that train stimulation is an effective mode of prevention of atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia, yet preventive stimulation should be performed as close as possible to the reentry circuit to reduce interatrial conduction delay.