Survey of 548 oncogenic fusion transcripts in thyroid tumors supports the importance of the already established thyroid fusions genes

Neoplasms frequently present structural chromosomal aberrations that can alter the level of expression of a protein or to the expression of an aberrant chimeric protein. In the thyroid, the PAX8‐PPARG fusion is present in the neoplastic lesions that have a follicular architecture—follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) and follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (FVPTC), and less frequently in follicular thyroid adenoma (FTA), while the presence of RET/PTC fusions are largely restricted to papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). The ability to detect fusion genes is relevant for a correct diagnosis and for therapy. We have developed a new fusion gene microarray‐based approach for simultaneous analysis of all known and predicted fusion gene variants. We did a comprehensive screen for 548 known and putative fusion genes in 27 samples of thyroid tumors and three positive controls—one thyroid cancer cell line (TPC‐1) and two PTCs with known CCDC6‐RET (alias RET/PTC1) fusion gene, using this microarray. Within the thyroid tumors tested, only well known, previously reported fusion genes in thyroid oncology were identified. Our results reinforce the pathogenic role played by RET/PTC1, RET/PTC3, and PAX8‐PPARG fusion genes in thyroid tumorigenesis. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma: genome-wide appraisal of a controversial entity

The majority of thyroid tumors are classified as papillary (papillary thyroid carcinomas; PTCs) or follicular neoplasms (follicular thyroid adenomas and carcinomas; FTA/FTC) based on nuclear features and the cellular growth pattern. However, classification of the follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (FVPTC) remains an issue of debate. These tumors contain a predominantly follicular growth pattern but display nuclear features and overall clinical behavior consistent with PTC. In this study, we used comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) to compare the global chromosomal aberrations in FVPTC to the PTC of classical variant (classical PTC) and FTA/FTC. In addition, we assessed the presence of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARG) alteration, a genetic event specific to FTA/FTC, using Southern blot and immunohistochemistry analyses. In sharp contrast to the findings in classical PTC (4% of cases), CGH analysis demonstrated that both FVPTC (59% of cases) and FTA/FTC (36% of cases) were commonly characterized by aneuploidy (P = 0.0002). Moreover, the pattern of chromosomal aberrations (gains at chromosome arms 2q, 4q, 5q, 6q, 8q, and 13q and deletions at 1p, 9q, 16q, 17q, 19q, and 22q) in the follicular variant of PTC closely resembled that of FTA/FTC. Aberrations in PPARG were uniquely detected in FVPTC and FTA/FTC. Our findings suggest a stronger relationship between the FVPTC and FTA/FTC than previously appreciated and support further consideration of the current classification of thyroid neoplasms.     

Low frequency of PAX8‐PPARγ rearrangement in follicular thyroid carcinomas in Japanese patients

Paired‐box gene 8 (PAX8)‐peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor‐γ (PPARγ) gene fusion has been identified at significant frequency in follicular thyroid carcinomas (FTCs) with cytogenetically detectable translocation t(2;3)(q13;p25). This represents a possible specific molecular marker for follicular carcinoma. In this study, we examined PAX8‐PPARγ rearrangement in 24 FTC samples from Japanese patients by reverse transcribed‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) using two upstream PAX8 primers located in exons 7 and 8 and a downstream primer in exon 1 of PPARγ. The fusion gene was detected in only one of 24 FTCs (4%). The FTC with PAX8‐PPARγ rearrangement from a 56‐year‐old man showed a product consistent with fusion between exon 8 of PAX8 and exon 1 of PPARγ. It was confirmed by direct sequencing. This FTC was histologically encapsulated, composed of trabeculae and small follicles and had complete penetration of the capsule by tumor tissues (minimally invasive type). The frequency of the fusion gene in this study was much lower than the 29–63% noted in reports from other countries suggesting that FTCs in Japanese patients may have a special genetic background, and that the high iodine intake from a typical Japanese diet might influence the frequency of the fusion gene in FTCs.     

Caveolin-1 Expression in Thyroid Neoplasia Spectrum: Comparison of Two Commercial Antibodies

We evaluated caveolin-1 expression in the human thyroid neoplasia spectrum with the aim of examining differences in expression as detected by two anti-caveolin-1 antibodies, and secondly, to investigate the association of caveolin-1 expression levels with aggressive papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Immunohistochemical staining using sc894 or AV09019 antibodies revealed that caveolin-1 was generally overexpressed in the PTC group as a whole (classical and follicular variant) when compared to peritumoral tissue (PT), while it was not detected in about half of follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) and majority of follicular adenomas (FTA). Caveolin-1 expression decreased in the following order: clPTC, fvPTC, FTC, PT and FTA. The diagnostic accuracy of AV09019 was better than that of sc894 for discriminating: FTA from FTC, FTA or FTC from the follicular variant of PTC, total PTC from nonmalignant tissue, and malignant tumors from nonmalignant tissue. Spearman''s analysis revealed positive correlations of caveolin-1 expression and extrathyroidal invasion (p < 0.05) in PTC for both antibodies. Additionally, AV09019 antibody correlated caveolin-1 upregulation with pathological T status.To conclude, as an immunohistochemical marker AV09019 antibody performed better than sc894 in distinguishing certain histotypes of thyroid tumors. In addition, increased expression of caveolin-1 may be considered as an indicator of papillary carcinoma progression.     

Encapsulated Malignant Follicular Cell-Derived Thyroid Tumors

Encapsulated malignant follicular cell-derived thyroid tumors are subject to considerable controversies. This group includes encapsulated follicular variant of papillary carcinoma (FVPTC) and encapsulated (so-called minimally invasive) follicular carcinoma (EFC). FVPTC usually presents as an encapsulated tumor and less commonly as a partially/nonencapsulated infiltrative neoplasm. The encapsulated form rarely metastasizes to lymph node, whereas infiltrative tumors often harbor nodal metastases. Encapsulated FVPTC have a molecular profile very close to follicular adenomas/carcinomas (high rate of RAS and absence of BRAF mutations). Infiltrative follicular variant has an opposite molecular profile closer to classical papillary thyroid carcinoma than to follicular adenoma/carcinoma (BRAF?>?RAS mutations). Noninvasive encapsulated FVPTC are extremely indolent even if treated with lobectomy without radioactive iodine therapy. Although most EFC are thought to have an excellent outcome, there are cases of EFC that recur and metastasize. EFC with angioinvasion, especially if extensive, have a significant rate of distant recurrence. Encapsulated FVPTC have a molecular profile and a clinical behavior very similar to the follicular adenoma/carcinoma class of tumor. If noninvasive, encapsulated FVPTC should be treated in a very conservative fashion. EFC with angioinvasion, especially if extensive, should not be termed minimally invasive in order to prevent undertreatment of the patient.     

Role of GPER1, EGFR and CXCR1 in differentiating between malignant follicular thyroid carcinoma and benign follicular thyroid adenoma

It is extremely difficult to discriminate between follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) and follicular thyroid adenoma (FTA) before surgery, because the morphologies of carcinoma cells and adenoma cells obtained by fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) are similar. Molecular markers may be helpful on this issue. The purpose of this study was to assess the role of GPER1, EGFR and CXCR1 in differential diagnosis between FTC and FTA. GPER1, EGFR and CXCR1 mRNA expression levels were examined in 15 FTCs and 10 FTAs using real-time RT-PCR. FTC showed to have significantly increased mRNA levels of the three molecules compared to FTA (P < 0.001 for all the three molecules). GPER1, EGFR and CXCR1 protein expression in 106 FTCs and 128 FTAs were analyzed using immunohistochemistry. The rates of GPER1, EGFR and CXCR1 high expression were 73.6%, 72.6% and 70.8% in FTC and 30.5%, 28.1% and 27.3% in FTA, respectively. Statistical analysis showed that GPER1, EGFR and CXCR1 protein expression were correlated with one another in FTC and concomitant high expression of the three molecules had stronger correlation with the occurrence of FTC than did each alone. The positive predictive values (PPV) for concomitant high expression of the three molecules for discriminating between FTC and FTA were 91.0% for GPER1/EGFR, 93.8% for GPER1/CXCR1, 92.3% for EGFR/CXCR1 and 98.2% for GPER1/EGFR/CXCR1, respectively. These results indicated that the evaluation of GPER1, EGFR and CXCR1 concomitant high expression may be helpful in differential diagnosis between FTC and FTA.     

Encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma with bone metastases.

Although true follicular thyroid carcinoma is known to metastasize via the bloodstream and give rise to bone and lung metastases, such a pattern of spread is rare in papillary thyroid carcinoma. The follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (FVPTC) is believed to behave in a clinical manner similar to usual or classical papillary cancer and to follow a similar indolent course. There have been a few reports of "aggressive" FVPTC wherein follicular patterned tumors with nuclear features of papillary carcinoma have metastasized hematogenously; these neoplasms have been diffusely invasive or multicentric in the thyroid. We report five cases of FVPTC, which were encapsulated and simulated grossly and microscopically follicular adenomas. In two of these, the primary was discovered after clinical presentation of bone metastases. In three others, bony metastases (without other nonosseous metastases) arose 7 to 17 years after thyroid lobectomy for lesions initially diagnosed as follicular adenoma In retrospect, these three encapsulated lesions had vascular invasion. We wish to bring attention to these innocuous-appearing lesions, which, although sharing nuclear features of papillary cancer, behave clinically in an unexpectedly malignant fashion.     

GADD153在甲状腺滤泡样肿瘤中的表达及与CK19、Galectin-3和HBME-1的对比研究

目的 探讨GADD153在甲状腺滤泡样肿瘤中的表达及其鉴别诊断价值,并与CK19、Galectin-3(简称Gal-3)和HBME-1进行对比.方法 应用免疫组织化学EnVision法检测了34例甲状腺滤泡性腺瘤、46例甲状腺滤泡性癌及29例甲状腺滤泡型乳头状癌中GADD153、CK19、Gal-3和HBME-1的表达情况.结果 (1)GADD153的表达位于细胞核,在甲状腺滤泡性癌中的表达大多为中度阳性或强阳性,在滤泡性腺瘤和滤泡型乳头状癌中的表达多为阴性或弱阳性,阳性表达率分别为82.6％( 38/46)、32.4％( 11/34)、10.3％ (3/29),滤泡性癌明显高于滤泡性腺瘤和滤泡型乳头状癌,差异均有统计学意义(x2值分别为20.80和37.48;均P＜0.01).(2)CK19、Gal-3和HBME-1 三种标志物均表达于细胞质,其阳性表达率在滤泡性癌为54.3％( 25/46)、67.4％ (31/46)、58.7％( 27/46),在滤泡性腺瘤为50.0％( 17/34)、29.4％( 10/34)、32.4％( 11/34),在滤泡型乳头状癌为100％( 29/29)、93.1％ (27/29)、89.7％ (26/29),滤泡型乳头状癌与滤泡性腺瘤、滤泡性癌间比较,差异亦均有统计学意义(x2值分别为21.20和8.22;均P＜0.01).(3)根据CK19、Gal-3、HBME-1和GADD153四种标志物表达的强弱分为低表达组(记为0和1+)和高表达组(记为2+和3+),分别计算其在各组的敏感性和特异性.滤泡性腺瘤组敏感性分别为26.5％、8.8％、2.9％和11.8％,特异性为50.7％、52.0％、54.7％和58.7％;滤泡性癌组敏感性分别为19.6％、26.1％、23.9％和65.2％,特异性为41.3％、57.1％、62.0％和92.1％;滤泡型乳头状癌组敏感性分别为96.6％、82.8％、79.3％和3.4％,特异性为77.5％、81.3％、85.0％和57.5％.结论 GADD153对甲状腺滤泡性癌诊断的敏感性和特异性均较好,而CK19、Gal-3和HBME-1则能更好地提示甲状腺滤泡型乳头状癌.四者联合应用能更好地鉴别甲状腺滤泡性肿瘤.     

Balanced translocation (3;7)(p25;q34): another mechanism of tumorigenesis in follicular thyroid carcinoma?

Alterations of 3p are the most frequently observed changes in follicular thyroid carcinomas. Loss of 3p25-pter has been speculated to be a critical event in the malignant transformation of a subset of thyroid follicular neoplasms. The present report describes a minimally invasive follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) with a balanced t(3;7)(p25;q34) and dic(15;22)(p11;p11) as the only abnormalities. The alterations were present in all metaphases analyzed and were demonstrated by G-banding, spectral karyotyping (SKY), and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). This study represents the second case of FTC where 3p25 is involved in a balanced translocation. The findings support the existence of a gene locus in this region which is involved in the tumorigenesis of thyroid carcinoma.     

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Noninvasive Follicular Thyroid Neoplasm with Papillary-Like Nuclear Features: Historical Context,Diagnosis, and Future Challenges

The encapsulated/well-demarcated non-invasive form of follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (FVPTC) that occurs annually in 45,000 patients worldwide was thought for 30 years to be a carcinoma. Many studies have now shown almost no recurrence in these non-invasive tumors, even in patients treated by surgery without radioactive iodine therapy. The categorization of the tumor as cancer has led to aggressive forms of treatment, with their side effects, financial costs, and the psychological and social impact of a cancer diagnosis. Recently, the encapsulated/well-demarcated non-invasive, FVPTC was renamed as noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) by an international group of experts. The new terminology lacks the carcinoma label enabling clinicians to avoid aggressive therapy. By taking the reader through the history of FVPTC, this article explains how diagnostic criteria for thyroid carcinoma of follicular cells have evolved over the last 60 years. It discusses the steps that led to the labeling of FVPTC as cancer and highlights the various studies that helped reclassify and rename this tumor. It also sheds light on the impact of this reclassification on cytologic diagnosis and focuses on the studies needed to refine and expand the histologic criteria of NIFTP. By understanding the history of this change in nomenclature, future classification of tumors will be greatly improved.     

HBME‐1 and CD15 immunocytochemistry in the follicular variant of thyroid papillary carcinoma

Papillary carcinoma is the most common thyroid malignancy. As the cytological diagnosis of papillary carcinoma is not difficult in patients with the usual type of lesion, fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) cytology is an effective method for preoperative evaluation. However, this modality is often ineffective in identifying the follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (FVPTC) due to its similarity to other follicular lesions and the incompleteness of typical nuclear features. Therefore, we investigated the expression of immunocytochemical markers of papillary carcinoma in cytological specimens of FVPTC and evaluated their utilities. The immunoreactivity of HBME‐1 and CD15 was investigated using 50 imprint smear cytological specimens obtained from thyroid lesions, including 13 FVPTC. The sensitivity and specificity of HBME‐1 for FVPTC were 92% and 89%, respectively, while those of CD15 were 23% and 100%, respectively. In conclusion, HBME‐1 is a sensitive marker of papillary carcinoma, including both usual type and FVPTC, in cytological specimens. Therefore, using HBME‐1 immunocytochemistry in FNA cytology will lead to reduction of the incidence of false‐negative diagnoses of FVPTC. Although CD15 is apparently inferior in terms of sensitivity for FVPTC, its excellent specificity will support the definitive diagnosis of thyroid malignancies, including FVPTC, after screening with HBME‐1.     

Immunohistochemical separation of follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma from follicular adenoma

The accurate diagnosis of differentiated thyroid tumors is very important for clinical management of patients. The histopathological distinction between some types of differentiated thyroid tumors can be very difficult even for experienced pathologists. We used immunohistochemical markers from published data obtained from DNA expression profiling, tissue microarray analysis, and immunohistochemistry to analyze a series of 157 thyroid tumors and 5 normal thyroids. These analyses showed that several antibodies were useful in distinguishing follicular adenomas from follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinomas including HBME-1, CITED 1, galectin-3, cytokeratin 19, and S100A4 (p<0.0001). A combination of markers consisting of a panel of HBME-1, galectin-3, and CK19 or a panel of HBME-1, CITED1, and galectin-3 was usually most effective in distinguishing follicular adenoma from follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Because individual tumors may not express some of these markers, the use of a panel of antibodies is recommended. These results indicate that some individual antibodies or a panel of antibodies combined with histopathological analysis can be useful in separating follicular adenoma (FA) from follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (FVPTC).     

Synchronous papillary thyroid carcinoma and follicular thyroid carcinoma: case report and review of literature

Collision tumor is a term denoting two histologically distinct tumor types occuring at the same anatomic site, which is a rare clinical entity. In the thyroid gland, collision tumors are rare. Here we report a case of the synchronous occurrence of follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) and papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). The current case report describes a 40-year-old woman with synchronous FTC and PTC. Pathologists and surgeons should be aware of collision tumors to avoid possible misdiagnosis.     

Molecular genetic study comparing follicular variant versus classic papillary thyroid carcinomas: association of N-ras mutation in codon 61 with follicular variant

Although the follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (FVPTC) has been classified as a papillary cancer based on nuclear features, its follicular growth pattern and potential for hematogenous spread are more characteristic of follicular carcinoma. To gain insight into the biologic nature of FVPTC, we compared genetic alterations characteristic of papillary and follicular thyroid carcinomas in 24 FVPTCs and 26 classic PTC (CPTCs). In FVPTCs, we observed ras mutation in 6 of 24 cases (25%), BRAF mutation in 1 of 13 cases (7.6%), and ret rearrangement in 5 of 12 cases (41.7%). In CPTCs, we found ras mutation in no case, BRAF mutation in 3 of 10 cases (30%), and ret rearrangement in 5 of 11 cases (45%). One FVPTC exhibited simultaneous ras mutation and ret/PTC1 rearrangement, and one CPTC harbored simultaneous BRAF mutation and ret/PTC3 rearrangement. Based on these findings, we concluded that ras mutation correlates with follicular differentiation of thyroid tumors whereas ret activation is associated with papillary nuclei but not with papillary architecture. ret activation is not exclusive of ras or BRAF mutation, whereas ras and BRAF mutations are mutually exclusive. The implications of these results for follicular and papillary carcinogenesis are discussed.