Long-term follow-up of OCT-guided bevacizumab treatment of macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion

Background

To evaluate the long-term outcome of an OCT-guided reinjection scheme for bevacizumab treatment of macular edema (ME) due to retinal vein occlusion.

Methods

Patients with persistent ME (>250 μm) due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) or branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) received intravitreal bevacizumab 2.5 mg/0.1 ml. Visual acuity (ETDRS), ophthalmic examination and OCT were performed at baseline and at 6- to 8-week intervals. Reinjections were only performed if OCT showed persistent or recurrent ME.

Results

Sixty-one patients with a minimum follow-up of 25 weeks were included in this analysis. Mean follow-up was 60?±?29 wks. In CRVO patients, central retinal thickness (CRT) decreased from 748?±?265 µm to 372?±?224 µm (p?<?0.001) and visual acuity (VA) improved by 1.9?±?3.2 lines. In BRVO patients, mean CRT decreased from 601?±?206 µm to 386?±?178 µm (p?<?0.001) and VA improved by 1.8?±?2.6 lines. Thirty-three percent of CRVO and 15% of BRVO patients did not show a ME recurrence for ≥25 wks at last visit. Thirty-seven percent of CRVO and 50% of BRVO patients suffered recurrences of ME within the last 25 wks, whereas 30% of CRVO and 35% of BRVO patients did not achieve a complete resolution of ME at any follow-up visit after receiving a minimum of three injections. CRVO patients with dry interval of ≥25 weeks at last visit were significantly younger, had a thinner CRT at baseline and more often had a complete resolution of ME after the first injection. In CRVO and BRVO, final VA was correlated significantly with initial VA, patients’ age and final CRT. Change of VA was correlated with change of CRT in BRVO.

Conclusions

Patients with retinal vein occlusion benefit from treatment with bevacizumab. Favourable long-term results without necessity of further injections were achieved in 33% and 15% of CRVO and BRVO patients respectively. The remaining patients needed repeated injections to treat ME recurrences. However, one third of the CRVO/BRVO patients did not improve in VA, and further injections might be discontinued in these patients.     

Comparison between ranibizumab and aflibercept for macular edema associated with central retinal vein occlusion

Purpose

We compared the efficacy of bimonthly intravitreal injections of ranibizumab (IVR) with that of bimonthly intravitreal injections of aflibercept (IVA) in two prospective, consecutive groups of patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).

Patients and Methods

Eyes with ME after CRVO received either bimonthly IVR (ranibizumab group; n = 13) or IVA (aflibercept group; n = 13) injections and were followed monthly for 6 months. Three patients in the ranibizumab group and two in the aflibercept group were lost to follow-up and excluded from the study. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT) on optical coherence tomography, and aqueous vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) concentrations were evaluated before and after treatment.

Results

From baseline to month 6, significant improvements occurred in mean logMAR BCVA (ranibizumab group: 0.78–0.47; p < 0.05; aflibercept group: 0.74–0.54; p < 0.05) and mean CFT (ranibizumab group: 685–311 µm; p < 0.05; aflibercept group: 695–230 µm; p < 0.05). Fluctuations in CFT were seen at months 2, 4, and 6 in the ranibizumab group. Mean aqueous VEGF concentration decreased from baseline to month 2 in the ranibizumab group (509.9–348.2 pg/ml) and aflibercept group (412.1 pg/ml to undetectable limits in eight of 11 eyes and to 13.6, 15.6, and 24.1 pg/ml in the other three eyes, respectively).

Conclusions

There was no significant improvement of visual acuity in one group compared with another; VEGF may not be completely neutralized by bimonthly injections of ranibizumab.

     

Improved visual outcome with early treatment in macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusions: 6-month results of a Korean RVO study

Purpose

To determine the correlation between the duration of macular edema (ME) and visual outcomes among Korean patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

Methods

Multicenter, interventional case series. Treatment-naive patients (n = 249) with branch or central RVO (BRVO/CRVO) and ME for <6 months were included. We assessed the correlation between the duration of ME and treatment outcomes including the mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity (logMAR BCVA) improvement, the proportion of patients achieving at least a 3-line gain in BCVA, and the mean reduction in central retinal thickness (CRT) at 6 months.

Results

One hundred and fifty-six patients with BRVO and 93 patients with CRVO were divided into five groups based on the duration of ME (<2, 2–4 weeks, 1–2, 2–3, 3–6 months); the mean baseline BCVA and CRT among the groups did not differ significantly. In BRVO, the mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) BCVA improvements in the groups were 0.51, 0.32, 0.17, 0.19, and 0.13, respectively (P = 0.002). The respective percentages of at least 3-line gains were 64, 53, 39, 38, and 21 % (P < 0.001). The BCVA didn’t significantly improve in CRVO. The decrease in CRT was not correlated significantly with the duration of ME in either disease.

Conclusions

Treatment of BRVO as early as 2 weeks after onset of ME enhanced the visual outcome; there was no correlation in the patients with CRVO. This finding supports the current trend favoring early treatment to obtain better visual outcomes in patients with BRVO.     

The effects of intravitreal bevacizumab on patients with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion

Objective: To evaluate the effect of intravitreal bevacizumab on visual acuity (VA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) in patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).Design: Retrospective review.Participants: The study included 42 patients with ME secondary to BRVO who received intravitreal injections of bevacizumab in 2 referral-based retinal practices in Vancouver, B.C., between November 2005 and July 2006.Methods: We performed a retrospective review of consecutive patients with ME secondary to BRVO. All of the patients in this study had nonischemic BRVOs. Patients were all treated with at least 1 bevacizumab injection and were seen at 6- to 8-week intervals for VA testing. Most of the patients also underwent optical coherence tomography (OCT) 2 months and 6 months after treatment. VA and OCT measurements at each follow-up time point were compared with the baseline values.Results: A total of 42 eyes from 42 patients with ME secondary to BRVO were reviewed. The mean VA improved from 20/280 at baseline to 20/180 at first follow-up session (p < 0.04; average follow-up = 42 days) and remained at a similar level, 20/170, through the eighth follow-up session (p < 0.04; average follow-up = 356). The CRT was reduced from a mean of 451 μm (388-512 μm) at baseline to 358 μm (298-418 μm) at 2 months (p < 0.02) and to 400 μm (335-465 μm) at 6 months postinjection (p < 0.068).Conclusions: We found a significant improvement in VA and CRT in patients with ME secondary to BRVO after intravitreal bevacizumab injection(s). No complications or serious side effects were observed. Intravitreal bevacizumab appears to have an emerging role as either a primary or an adjuvant treatment modality in the setting of ME secondary to BRVO.     

Long-term evaluation of patients treated with dexamethasone intravitreal implant for macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion

Purpose

To evaluate the long-term visual prognosis and complications of patients who received intravitreal Ozurdex injections for the treatment of macular edema (ME) due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

Methods

A total of 17 patients who received Ozurdex injections in our institution as part of the GENEVA study were recalled for examination. Recorded parameters included final visual acuity (VA), final retinal thickness by optical coherence tomography, persistence of ME, and the occurrence of any complications.

Results

Mean follow-up time was 50.5 months. Patients with branch RVO (BRVO) had a more favorable prognosis than central RVO (CRVO), and their mean VA had improved significantly, whereas the mean VA for the patients with CRVO did not improve significantly. Retinal thickness had reduced significantly in the whole group and in each subgroup separately. Complications included 10 patients with cataract progression, 1 with elevated intraocular pressure, and 1 with neovascularization and vitreous hemorrhage.

Conclusions

This is the first reported long-term evaluation of patients treated with Ozurdex. Our results indicate that it has favorable long-term safety profile, and may have a beneficial effect on the visual prognosis in BRVO even in the absence of continuous treatment. Further research is required to establish the optimal retreatment schedule for Ozurdex.     

Ranibizumab for serous macular detachment in branch retinal vein occlusions

Background

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of intravitreal ranibizumab in the treatment of macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusions (BRVO) with and without serous macular neuroretinal detachment (SMD).

Methods

Forty-nine eyes of 49 patients with macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion (22 with SMD and 27 without SMD) were included in this prospective, parallel-group, comparative study. Intravitreal injection of ranibizumab was administered at baseline. Thereafter patients were followed monthly and further injections were performed in the presence of persistence or recurrence of macular thickening. Flattening of the macula was considered success. At the last visit, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) quantitative parameters (central subfield thickness, cube volume, average cube thickness) were compared between groups.

Results

In patients with SMD, BCVA and all the SD-OCT quantitative parameters improved significantly after a mean number of 5.0 ranibizumab intravitreal injections through a median follow-up of 12.5 months (range, 7–34). In patients without SMD, all the variables analyzed improved significantly except for the cube volume, after a mean number of 4.3 ranibizumab intravitreal injections through a median follow-up of 10.4 months (range, 6.5–40.2). The numbers of injections were similar in both groups. The final BCVA was better in patients without SMD at baseline but without significant differences in the SD-OCT parameters between groups.

Conclusions

The presence of SMD may be a baseline predictive factor for ranibizumab treatment outcomes in BRVO patients, with no influence in the number of treatments needed between patients with or without SMD at baseline. Further studies are needed in order to confirm the role of SMD as an independent predicitive factor in cases of BRVO.     

Comparison of the effects of intravitreal bevacizumab and triamcinolone acetonide in the treatment of macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion

Aim:

To compare the effects of intravitrealbevacizumab (IVB) and intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVT) in the treatment of macular edema (ME) secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).

Materials and Methods:

There were 20 patients treated with IVB (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) and 16 treated with IVT (4 mg/0.1 mL). The two groups were compared with regard to best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT) on optical coherence tomography (OCT), slit-lamp biomicroscopy and fundus fluorescein angiography results, intraocular pressure (IOP), numbers of injections, and adverse events.

Results:

The mean follow-up times in the IVB and IVT groups were 17.45±8.1 months (range: 8–33 months) and 19.94±10.59 months (range: 6–40 months), respectively (P = 0.431). Visual acuity increased and CMT decreased significantly within both groups, but no differences were observed between the groups (P = 0.718). The percentages of patients with increased IOP and iatrogenic cataracts were significantly higher in the IVT group than in the IVB group.

Conclusions:

Treatment with IVB and IVT both resulted in significant improvement in visual acuity and a decrease in CMT in patients with ME secondary to non-ischemic CRVO, with no difference between the two treatments. The incidence of adverse events, however, was significantly greater in the IVT group than in the IVB group. IVB may be preferred over IVT for the treatment of ME in patients with non-ischemic CRVO.     

Twelve-month experience with Ozurdex for the treatment of macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex) alone or in combination with bevacizumab.

Methods

Sixty-four eyes were prospectively investigated. Group 1 (22 central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and 16 branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO)) was treated with Ozurdex alone, and group 2 (14 CRVO and 12 BRVO) was treated with three consecutive bevacizumab injections followed by Ozurdex. Recurrences were treated with Ozurdex only. Patients were seen preoperatively and thereafter in monthly intervals. The primary end point was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 12 months.

Results

In group 1, BCVA improved by 6.6 (±1.7) letters in CRVO and 7.8 (±2.9) in BRVO patients, and in group 2 by 9.8 (±1.0) vs 9.4 (±2.1) letters. A significant difference was only seen between CRVO patients in group 1 and 2 at 12 months (P<0.05). Recurrence after the first Ozurdex injection occurred after 3.8 (CRVO) and 3.5 months (BRVO) in group 1, vs 3.2 and 3.7 months in group 2. Elevated intraocular pressure (>5 mm Hg) was measured in approximately 40% cataract progression requiring surgery in about 50% of eyes after three Ozurdex injections.

Conclusion

Combined treatment showed slightly better functional outcome for CRVO patients. Increased intraocular pressure and cataract progression was frequent and should be considered when an individual treatment is planned.     

Two-year results of combined intravitreal ranibizumab and photodynamic therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy

Background

To clarify the efficacy of combined therapy with intravitreal ranibizumab injections and photodynamic therapy (PDT) in patients with symptomatic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 57 treatment-naïve eyes of 57 patients. Thirty-two patients were treated with standard fluence PDT (PDT group), and 25 patients were treated with three consecutive monthly intravitreal injections of ranibizumab and standard fluence PDT (ranibizumab plus PDT group). All patients were followed for at least 24 months.

Results

In the ranibizumab plus PDT group, the mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) levels of decimal (logMAR equivalent) significantly improved from 0.30 (0.52) at baseline to 0.55 (0.26) at 24 months (P?<?0.001). In the PDT group, the BCVA levels stabilized from 0.26 (0.58) at baseline to 0.25 (0.60) at 24 months. The mean changes in the BCVA in the ranibizumab plus PDT group and the PDT group were improvement of 2.63 lines and decline of 0.16 lines respectively (P?=?0.010). The mean number of PDTs at 24 months in the ranibizumab plus PDT group and the PDT group were 1.4 and 2.6 respectively. Increased subretinal hemorrhages were seen in eight (18.0 %) eyes, all of which were belonging to the PDT group.

Conclusions

Combined intravitreal ranibizumab and PDT was significantly more effective in maintaining and improving VA for PCV patients compared with PDT monotherapy over 24 months.     

Ranibizumab as an adjunct to laser for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion

Purpose:

To compare the safety, efficacy, and dosing regimen of intravitreal ranibizumab as an adjunct to laser therapy for the treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

Materials and Methods:

Thirty eyes of 30 patients of BRVO of at least 6 weeks duration were randomized into three groups: Group 1 received grid laser treatment alone, Group 2 received a single dose of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (0.5 mg / 0.05 ml) followed by grid laser treatment on 7^th day following injection, while Group 3 received three loading doses of intravitreal ranibizumab at monthly interval (i.e. 0, 1, & 2 months) + standard laser treatment 7 days after the 1^st injection. Outcome measure noted at 6 months follow-up were the improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT).

Results:

At 6 months follow-up, there was an average gain of 12 letters (P=0.05), 17.5 letters (P=0.05) and 19 letters (P=0.05) in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, with the decrease in CMT being 208.7 μm (P=0.05), 312.9 μm (P= 0.05) and 326.8 μm (P=0.05), respectively, in these groups. Gain in BCVA of more than 3 lines was noted in 1/10 patients in Group 1(10%) as compared to 3/10 (30%) and 4/10 (40%) patients in groups 2 and 3, respectively.

Conclusion:

The gain in BCVA and reduction in CMT were better with combination therapy (single- and triple- dose regimen) compared to grid laser alone. Single dose of intravitreal ranibizumab with grid laser seems to be an effective therapy.     

Anti-VEGF-refractory Exudative Age-related Macular Degeneration: Differential Response According to Features on Optical Coherence Tomography

Purpose

To describe optical coherence tomography (OCT) characteristics of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) patients refractory to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections (ranibizumab, bevacizumab) and their responses to alternative anti-VEGF agents or photodynamic therapy (PDT).

Methods

A retrospective review of 267 neovascular AMD patients treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections.

Results

Twenty patients (7.5%) were refractory to anti-VEGF injections (stationary or increased retinal exudation despite three or more monthly injections). They were grouped into either the extensive intraretinal fluid group (IRF group, 9 patients) or the subretinal fluid only group (SRF group, 11 patients) according to OCT findings. In the IRF group, response rates to subsequent treatment were 0% (0 / 7) for bevacizumab, 50% (3 / 6) for ranibizumab and 50% (3 / 6) for PDT ± anti-VEGF. Three out of four bevacizumab-refractory patients showed response to ranibizumab as a secondary treatment. In the SRF group, response rates were lower with 0% (0 / 7) for bevacizumab, 22.2% (2 / 9) for ranibizumab and 28.6% (2 / 7) for PDT ± anti-VEGF. One out of four bevacizumab-refractory patients responded to ranibizumab. The visual outcome was worse in the IRF group (median 20 / 1,000) than in the SRF group (median 20 / 100).

Conclusions

In anti-VEGF-refractory neovascular AMD, patients with extensive IRF refractory to bevacizumab can be responsive to ranibizumab while patients with SRF may be refractory to both, suggesting a different pathophysiology and intraocular pharmacokinetics.     

OCT-Befund als Reinjektionskriterium für die 2,5-mg-Bevacizumab-Therapie bei venösen retinalen Verschlüssen

Background

Macular edema (ME) due to retinal vein occlusion can be successfully treated with intravitreal bevacizumab therapy. There is no common recommendation concerning time intervals and criteria for reinjection.

Method

Sixty-three patients (follow-up 30±18 weeks) received intravitreal injections of 2.5 mg bevacizumab. Reinjection was performed only if optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed persistent or recurrent ME. Check-ups were performed every 6–8 weeks.

Results

There was complete resolution of macular edema in 31 patients after the first injection (improvement in visual acuity 3.7±3.7 lines); 65.2% of these patients developed recurrence of ME within 13.3±4.4 weeks, which completely resolved again after a second injection. Visual acuity gained the same level as after the first injection. Another relapse of ME in this group occurred in 69% of patients after another 13.4±5.4 weeks. Patients with persistent ME after the first injection (n=32) received a second injection, initially leading to resolution of ME in 33.3%, but all of these patients had a relapse within 13.9±4.1 weeks.

Conclusion

OCT-guided reinjection leads to anatomic and functional stabilization or improvement even if transient recurrence of ME occurs.     

Early peripheral laser photocoagulation of nonperfused retina improves vision in patients with central retinal vein occlusion (Results of a proof of concept study)

Background

To evaluate the effect of combination of ranibizumab and laser photocoagulation to peripheral retinal areas of nonperfusion in patients with non-ischemic central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) without neovascularizations.

Methods

This prospective, proof of concept study randomized 22 CRVO patients into two arms. The RL group (ranibizumab + laser; n?=?10) received ranibizumab with additive laser photocoagulation; the control R group (n?=?12) was treated with ranibizumab only. All patients received three initial monthly ranibizumab injections followed by PRN regimen. Changes in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and in central retinal thickness (CRT) were documented over 6 months.

Results

Median of BCVA improved in the RL group from 65 ETDRS letters (interquartile range IQR?=?10 letters) at baseline to 70 (IQR?=?23.2) letters at month 6. In the control group BCVA remained stable [baseline: 61 (IQR?=?19.5) and month 6: 61 (IQR?=?22) letters]. CRT decreased between baseline and final visit in the RL group from 547 (IQR?=?513) μm to 246.5 (IQR?=?346.3) μm, and in the control group from 637.5 (IQR?=?344) μm to 423 (IQR?=?737) μm. More pronounced improvements in BCVA were seen in the RL group (medians?=?14 vs. 6.5 letters) although the observed group differences were not statistically significant due to small samples.

Conclusions

The selective laser photocoagulation of peripheral areas of nonperfusion seems to lead to additional visual improvement in patients with CRVO. A larger replication trial is necessary to confirm the results of this proof of concept study.     

Patterns of ranibizumab and aflibercept treatment of central retinal vein occlusion in routine clinical practice in the USA

Background

The intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatments ranibizumab and aflibercept have proven efficacy in clinical trials, but their real world usage in central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) has not been assessed. We therefore evaluated the treatment patterns of both drugs in a US claims database.

Methods

The IMS Integrated Data Warehouse was used to identify the patients with CRVO in the USA with claims for ranibizumab or aflibercept between 24 September 2012 and 31 March 2014 with at least 12 months follow-up. Patients were required to have had no anti-VEGF treatment code for 6 months before index (‘treatment-naive''). Mean numbers of injections and non-injection visits to a treating physician were compared with patients receiving these treatments.

Results

Patient characteristics were similar for patients receiving ranibizumab (n=206) or aflibercept (n=79) at index. The mean (±SD) numbers of injections received by patients treated with ranibizumab or aflibercept were 4.4±2.8 and 4.7±2.9 (P=0.38), respectively; the total number of patient visits to their treating physician was 7.3±3.7 and 7.0±2.9 (P=0.52), respectively. For patients receiving one or more injections (n=238), the mean interval between injections was 55.1 days (ranibizumab) and 54.2 days (aflibercept; P=0.44).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that, in routine clinical practice, patients receive a comparable number of injections in the first year of treatment with ranibizumab or aflibercept. This may have implications for commissioning and service development of CRVO care pathways.     

Electroretinograms and level of aqueous vascular endothelial growth factor in eyes with hemicentral retinal vein occlusion or branch retinal vein occlusion

Purpose

Hemicentral retinal vein occlusion (hCRVO) is a disease related to CRVO but not to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). We reported a significant correlation between aqueous vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels and the implicit time of 30-Hz flicker electroretinogram (ERG) in CRVO eyes. The purpose of this study was to compare aqueous VEGF levels and ERG components between hCRVO and BRVO eyes.

Methods

The medical records of patients with macular edema secondary to hCRVO (12 eyes) or BRVO (16 eyes) and received an intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (IVB) at the Nagoya University Hospital from July 2009 to May 2013 were reviewed. Full-field ERGs were recorded before the IVB. Aqueous humor was collected just before the IVB to measure VEGF concentration. Differences in aqueous VEGF level and ERG components between hCRVO and BRVO eyes were determined.

Results

Mean aqueous VEGF concentration in hCRVO eyes was significantly higher than that in BRVO eyes (504 vs. 148 pg/ml, P < 0.05). The implicit time of 30-Hz flicker ERG was significantly longer in hCRVO than in BRVO eyes (33.5 vs. 29.8 ms, P < 0.01).

Conclusion

The significant difference in VEGF levels in aqueous and implicit times of 30-Hz flicker ERG suggest that retinal ischemia is more manifest in hCRVO than in BRVO eyes.     

Predictive factors for changes in macular edema in intravitreal bevacizumab therapy of retinal vein occlusion

Background  

To evaluate prognostic factors of response to intravitreal bevacizumab therapy of macular edema (ME) due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) or branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).     

Fast Resolution of Recurrent Pronounced Macular Edema following Intravitreal Injection of Dexamethasone 0.7 mg

Purpose

To report the fast resolution of recurrent pronounced macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) within 72 h following intravitreal injection of dexamethasone 0.7 mg (Ozurdex®).

Methods

An interventional case report with optical coherence tomography scans and fluorescein angiographic pictures.

Results

A 69-year-old Caucasian man underwent intravitreal injection of dexamethasone 0.7 mg due to incomplete CRVO. He had previously undergone 6 intravitreal injections of bevacizumab 1.25 mg (Avastin®) and a C-grid laser photocoagulation over an interval of 16 months. After repeated recurrences of macular edema, the injection of dexamethasone reduced the macular edema from 570 μm preoperatively to 246 μm postoperatively within 72 h following the injection. Best-corrected visual acuity improved from 0.1 to 0.6 within the same interval.

Conclusion

Dexamethasone can lead to a very fast reduction of macular edema in patients with vision loss due to CRVO and may facilitate an immediate visual rehabilitation. Retinal anatomy and visual acuity may be restored even in long-standing, recurrent cases.Key Words: Central retinal vein occlusion, Dexamethasone 0.7 mg, Ozurdex®, Recurrent macular edema     

OCT patterns of macular edema and response to bevacizumab therapy in retinal vein occlusion

Background  

Baseline OCT morphology of macular edema (ME) due to branch (BRVO) or central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) was evaluated with respect to response to bevacizumab treatment.     

Clinical outcomes after switching treatment from intravitreal ranibizumab to aflibercept in neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Purpose

To describe the treatment response to aflibercept in patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration that showed insufficient or diminishing treatment effects under ranibizumab.

Methods

From December 2012 till June 2013 all patients receiving intravitreal injections of aflibercept after previous treatment with ranibizumab were collected in a database and retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data such as visual acuity or central subfield retinal thickness on optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans were analyzed for the time frame before, during, and shortly after the aflibercept injections. Of particular interest was the comparison of clinical features under ongoing ranibizumab treatment to the time during aflibercept treatment.

Results

Seventy-one eyes of 65 patients were included in the study. All eyes had previous ranibizumab injections in their medical history, the average number of which was nine (range 3-43). For the total group the mean visual acuity (VA) before the first ranibizumab injection was 0.54 logMAR, and after the last ranibizumab injection was 0.57 logMAR. Mean VA changed from 0.47 logMAR before the first aflibercept injection to 0.25 logMAR after the last aflibercept injection. Central subfield retinal thickness (CSRT) on OCT changed from a mean of 417.28 μm to 349.52 μm under ranibizumab treatment and from 338.76 μm to 272.00 μm under aflibercept treatment. Interestingly, 33 % of cases that did not show a functional improvement under ranibizumab therapy gained visual acuity after aflibercept treatment.

Conclusion

Aflibercept appears to be an effective choice for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration who were resistant to previous therapy of ranibizumab. The longevity of this effect still remains questionable.     

Intravitreal ranibizumab for the treatment of fibrovascular pigment epithelial detachment in age-related macular degeneration

Objective

To determine the response of predominantly fibrovascular pigment epithelial detachments (PED)–type lesions (secondary to age-related macular degeneration [AMD]) to intravitreal ranibizumab.

Design

This was an open-label prospective study.

Participants

Thirty-two patients with predominantly fibrovascular PED-type lesions secondary to AMD were included in this study. Three patients were excluded from the final analysis.

Methods

Patients received monthly intravitreal ranibizumab injections for 6 months (induction). At 6 months, patients not experiencing a visual improvement from baseline Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity or not showing a reduction in PED height (based on optical coherence tomography [OCT]) were deemed ranibizumab nonresponders and received no further injections but underwent re-evaluation at 12 months. Patients deemed responders continued with OCT-guided active treatment on an as-needed basis for an additional 6 months.

Results

Twenty-four patients (82.8%) were ranibizumab responders and 5 were (17.2%) nonresponders. For ranibizumab responders, mean ETDRS visual acuity improved by 7.2 ± 9.8 letters at 6 months (p = 0.002) and 6.3 ± 8.6 letters at 12 months (p = 0.002). Ranibizumab nonresponders experienced a decline in mean visual acuity of 8.2 ± 4.6 letters at 6 months (p = 0.02) and 18.2 ± 10.11 letters at 12 months (p = 0.02). At baseline, responders had a mean PED height of 345.8 ± 96.0 μm, which decreased to 111.6 ± 133.2 μm at 6 months (p < 0.001) and had a slight increase at 12 months to 144.8 ± 146.3 μm (p < 0.001). Two responders (8.3%) and 2 nonresponders (40%) developed retinal pigment epithelium tears while on treatment.

Conclusions

Intravitreal ranibizumab appears to be a well-tolerated treatment option for patients with fibrovascular PED. Further large-scale, prospective studies may assist in delineating the best treatment protocol.