英利昔单抗联合甲氨蝶呤治疗类风湿关节炎的随机双盲临床研究

目的评价英利昔单抗与甲氨蝶呤(MTX)联合使用与单独使用MTX,在治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)中的疗效与安全性。方法本研究为随机、双盲、平行对照的临床试验。49例接受过至少3个月稳定剂量MTX治疗的活动性RA患者随机分为试验组(24例)和对照组(25例)。两组受试者在第0、2、6、14周分别接受3mg/kg的英利昔单抗或安慰剂静脉滴注,同时每周按固定剂量继续服MTX。并于试验的第0、2、6、14、18周随访,评价疗效和不良反应。以美国风湿病学会(ACR)疗效评价指标ACR20为主要疗效指标,ACR50、ACR70、晨僵时间、关节肿胀数、关节肿胀指数、关节压痛数、关节压痛指数；次要疗效指标为疼痛目视模拟测量表(VAS)评分、疲乏VAS评分、疾病总体状况的医生评价VAS评分、疾病总体状况的病人评价VAS评分、健康评价问卷(HAQ)评分。结果治疗后第2周时,英利昔单抗联合MTX组ACR20有效率为62．5%,对照组仅为8．0%(P=0．002)；晨僵时间、关节压痛数、关节压痛指数、关节肿胀数、关节肿胀指数、疼痛VAS、疲乏VAS、医生总体评价VAS、病人总体评价VAS、HAQ和血沉等较对照组也均有显著的改善(P＜0．05或P＜0．01)。第18周时,英利昔单抗联合MTX组ACR20有效率为79．2%,对照组只有48．0%(P=0．024)。两组之间不良事件发生率差异无统计学意义。结论英利昔单抗联合MTX治疗RA的疗效明显优于单用MTX的疗效,能迅速改善与RA有关的各项症状、体征和实验室炎性活动指标,具有良好的安全性。     

Predictors of joint damage in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis treated with high-dose methotrexate with or without concomitant infliximab: results from the ASPIRE trial

OBJECTIVE: To identify disease characteristics leading to progression of joint damage in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with methotrexate (MTX) versus those treated with infliximab plus MTX. METHODS: Patients who had not previously been treated with MTX with active RA were randomly assigned to receive escalating doses of MTX up to 20 mg/week plus placebo or infliximab at weeks 0, 2, and 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter through week 46. Radiographic joint damage was assessed using the modified Sharp/van der Heijde score (SHS). The relationship between disease activity measures at baseline and week 14, as well as those averaged over time, were examined in relation to the change in SHS from baseline through week 54. RESULTS: C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and swollen joint count were associated with greater joint damage progression in the MTX-only group, while none of these parameters was associated with progression in the infliximab plus MTX group. Mean changes in SHS among patients in the highest CRP (> or = 3 mg/dl) and ESR (> or = 52 mm/hour) tertiles in the MTX-only group were 5.62 and 5.89, respectively, compared with 0.73 and 1.12 in the infliximab plus MTX group (P < 0.001). Patients with greater joint damage at baseline (SHS > or = 10.5) showed less progression with infliximab plus MTX compared with MTX alone (-0.39 versus 4.11; P < 0.001). Patients receiving MTX alone who had persistently active disease at week 14 showed greater radiographic progression of joint damage than those taking MTX plus infliximab. CONCLUSION: High CRP level, high ESR, or persistent disease activity was associated with greater radiographic progression in the group taking MTX alone, while little radiographic progression was seen in patients receiving both MTX and infliximab, regardless of the abnormal levels of these traditional predictors.     

Infliximab treatment maintains employability in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of infliximab therapy on the employment status of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Methotrexate (MTX)-naive patients with active early RA were randomly allocated to receive MTX plus placebo or MTX plus infliximab (3 mg/kg or 6 mg/kg) at weeks 0, 2, and 6 and then every 8 weeks through week 46. Data for patients younger than age 65 years were included in the analyses. A patient was categorized as employable if he or she was employed or felt well enough to work if a job were available. RESULTS: The change in actual employment was not significantly different between patients receiving MTX plus infliximab and those receiving MTX plus placebo (0.5% versus 1.3%; P > 0.5). However, the proportion of patients whose status changed from employable at baseline to unemployable at week 54 was smaller in the group receiving MTX plus infliximab compared with that in the group receiving MTX alone (8% versus 14%; P = 0.05). Patients who were treated with infliximab plus MTX had a significantly greater likelihood of improvement rather than deterioration in employability (odds ratio 2.4; P < 0.001); this likelihood was not significantly greater in patients receiving MTX alone. The proportion of employed patients who lost workdays during the trial was smaller in the MTX plus infliximab group than in the MTX-alone group (P = 0.010). CONCLUSION: The actual employment rates among patients in the 2 treatment groups were not different. However, patients with early RA who were treated with MTX plus infliximab had a higher probability of maintaining their employability compared with those who were treated with MTX alone.     

Golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacology of subcutaneous administration of golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite treatment with methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned in a double-blinded manner to receive injections of placebo plus MTX or 50 mg or 100 mg golimumab every 2 or 4 weeks plus MTX through week 48. Patients originally assigned to receive injections every 2 weeks had the interval increased to every 4 weeks starting at week 20. The primary end point was the proportion of patients meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (achieving an ACR20 response) at week 16. The study was powered to detect a difference in the primary end point when the combined golimumab groups and at least 1 of the individual dose groups were compared with placebo. RESULTS: The primary end point was attained. Sixty-one percent of patients in the combined golimumab plus MTX dose groups achieved an ACR20 response at week 16 compared with 37% of patients in the placebo plus MTX group (P=0.010). In addition, 79% of patients in the group receiving 100 mg golimumab every 2 weeks achieved an ACR20 response (P<0.001 versus placebo). Through week 20 (after which patients receiving placebo were switched to active infliximab therapy), serious adverse events were reported in 9% of patients in the combined golimumab groups and in 6% of patients in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: Golimumab plus MTX effectively reduces the signs and symptoms of RA and is generally well tolerated in patients with an inadequate response to MTX.     

Sustained improvement over two years in physical function, structural damage, and signs and symptoms among patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with infliximab and methotrexate

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of repeated administration of infliximab plus methotrexate (MTX) over a 2-year period in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who previously experienced an incomplete response to MTX. METHODS: Four hundred twenty-eight patients were randomly assigned to receive MTX plus placebo or infliximab at a dose of 3 or 10 mg/kg plus MTX for 54 weeks, with an additional year of followup. The protocol was later amended to allow for continued treatment during the second year. Of 259 patients who entered the second year of treatment, 216 continued to receive infliximab plus MTX for 102 weeks. Ninety-four of these 259 patients experienced a gap in therapy of >8 weeks before continuing therapy. Infusions were administered at weeks 0, 2, and 6, followed by treatment every 4 weeks or every 8 weeks (alternating with placebo infusions in the interim 4-week visits) at a dose of 3 or 10 mg/kg for a total of 102 weeks (including the gap in therapy). For safety and efficacy assessments, data on the patients who were randomized to receive treatment, irrespective of whether treatment was administered for 102 weeks, were evaluated using all actual observations available. The efficacy measures included the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) (physical function), Short Form 36 health survey (SF-36) (health-related quality of life), total radiographic scores (structural damage), and the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) (signs and symptoms). RESULTS: The infliximab plus MTX regimens resulted in significantly greater improvement in HAQ scores (P < or = 0.006) and SF-36 physical component summary scores (P < or = 0.011) compared with the MTX-only group. There also was stability in the SF-36 mental component summary score among patients who received the infliximab plus MTX regimens. Median changes from baseline to week 102 in the total radiographic score were 4.25 for patients who received the MTX-only regimen and 0.50 for patients who received the infliximab plus MTX regimen. The proportion of patients achieving an ACR20 response at week 102 varied from 40% to 48% for the infliximab plus MTX groups compared with 16% for the MTX-only group. CONCLUSION: Throughout 102 weeks of therapy, infliximab plus MTX provided significant, clinically relevant improvement in physical function and quality of life, accompanied by inhibition of progressive joint damage and sustained improvement in the signs and symptoms of RA among patients who previously had an incomplete response to MTX alone.     

Infliximab and methotrexate as induction therapy in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of infliximab plus methotrexate (MTX) as induction therapy in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-naive patients with active, early RA who were included as group 4 of the BeSt study were initially treated with infliximab (3 mg/kg) in combination with MTX (25 mg/week). The Disease Activity Score (DAS) was measured every 3 months. In patients with persistent low disease activity (DAS 2.4, the infliximab dosage was increased (maximum 10 mg/kg), and they were subsequently switched to another DMARD. Except for intraarticular administration, corticosteroids were not permitted. Functional ability and the modified Sharp/van der Heijde score were determined after 2 years of therapy. RESULTS: Of the 120 patients, 67 responders (56%) had persistent low disease activity and discontinued infliximab after a median of 9.9 months, with a median MTX dosage of 10 mg/week after 2 years. Ten other patients experienced a disease flare after discontinuation and resumed infliximab after a median of 3.7 months. Thirteen patients did not achieve persistent low disease activity and received infliximab at various dosages. Treatment was unsuccessful in 30 patients. In the 67 responders, the progression of joint damage was lower than in the 30 patients in whom treatment failed. CONCLUSION: Fifty-six percent of patients with active early RA, initially treated with infliximab plus MTX, could discontinue infliximab after achieving a DAS of 相似文献   

Radiographic, clinical, and functional outcomes of treatment with adalimumab (a human anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis receiving concomitant methotrexate therapy: a randomized, placebo-controlled, 52-week trial

OBJECTIVE: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) is an important proinflammatory cytokine that mediates inflammatory synovitis and articular matrix degradation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We investigated the ability of adalimumab, a human anti-TNF monoclonal antibody, to inhibit the progression of structural joint damage, reduce the signs and symptoms, and improve physical function in patients with active RA receiving concomitant treatment with methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: In this multicenter, 52-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 619 patients with active RA who had an inadequate response to MTX were randomized to receive adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously every other week (n = 207), adalimumab 20 mg subcutaneously every week (n = 212), or placebo (n = 200) plus concomitant MTX. The primary efficacy end points were radiographic progression at week 52 (total Sharp score by a modified method [TSS]), clinical response at week 24 (improvements of at least 20% in the American College of Rheumatology core criteria [ACR20]), and physical function at week 52 (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]). RESULTS: At week 52, there was statistically significantly less radiographic progression, as measured by the change in TSS, in the patients receiving adalimumab either 40 mg every other week (mean +/- SD change 0.1 +/- 4.8) or 20 mg weekly (0.8 +/- 4.9) as compared with that in the placebo group (2.7 +/- 6.8) (P < or = 0.001 for each comparison). In addition, there were statistically significant changes in the components of the TSS. At week 24, ACR20 responses were achieved by 63% and 61% of patients in the adalimumab 40 mg every other week and 20 mg weekly groups, respectively, versus 30% of patients in the placebo group (P < or = 0.001 for each comparison). At week 52, ACR20 responses were achieved by 59% and 55% of patients taking adalimumab 40 mg every other week and 20 mg weekly, respectively, versus 24% of patients taking placebo (P < or = 0.001 for each comparison). At week 52, physical function as measured by the HAQ demonstrated statistically significant improvement with adalimumab 40 mg every other week and 20 mg weekly compared with placebo (mean change in HAQ score -0.59 and -0.61, respectively, versus -0.25; P < or = 0.001 for each comparison). A total of 467 patients (75.4%) completed 52 weeks of treatment. Adalimumab was generally well tolerated. Discontinuations occurred in 22.0% of adalimumab-treated patients and in 30.0% of placebo-treated patients. The rate of adverse events (both serious and nonserious) was comparable in the adalimumab and placebo groups, although the proportion of patients reporting serious infections was higher in patients receiving adalimumab (3.8%) than in those receiving placebo (0.5%) (P < or = 0.02), and was highest in the patients receiving 40 mg every other week. CONCLUSION: In this 52-week trial, adalimumab was more effective than placebo at inhibiting the progression of structural joint damage, reducing the signs and symptoms, and improving physical function in patients with active RA who had demonstrated an incomplete response to MTX.     

Ultrasonographic and radiographic results from a two-year controlled trial of immediate or one-year-delayed addition of infliximab to ongoing methotrexate therapy in patients with erosive early rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To compare the impact of immediate and delayed introduction of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy on inflammation and structural damage in methotrexate (MTX)-treated patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Twenty-four patients with erosive early RA (duration < 3 years) who were receiving MTX were randomized to receive infliximab 5 mg/kg or placebo infusions at weeks 0, 2, and 6, and then every 8 weeks through week 46. Beginning at week 54 and thereafter, all patients received infliximab 5 mg/kg. Metacarpophalangeal joints were scanned using high-frequency ultrasonography and power Doppler imaging. Radiographs were evaluated using the modified Sharp/van der Heijde scoring system. RESULTS: From baseline to week 54, total synovial thickness was significantly improved in the infliximab + MTX group compared with the placebo + MTX group (median reduction 95.8% versus 37.5%; P = 0.005), as was the total color Doppler area (CDA; vascularity assessment) (median reduction 100% and 47.1%, respectively; P = 0.025). From week 0 to week 110, no significant between-group difference was observed in the change from baseline for total synovial thickening or the total CDA. At week 54, greater progression in the Sharp/van der Heijde score was apparent in patients receiving placebo + MTX compared with those receiving infliximab + MTX. Although radiographic progression in the placebo + MTX group was greatly reduced in the second year (after initiation of infliximab therapy), marked differences were observed between the infliximab + MTX group (median change in the Sharp/van der Heijde score 4.0) and the placebo + MTX group (median change 14.5) from baseline to week 110 (P = 0.076). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the efficacy of 2 years of combination therapy with infliximab + MTX for inhibiting cumulative structural damage was superior to that of 1 year of treatment with MTX alone followed by the addition of infliximab.     

Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with anakinra, a recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, in combination with methotrexate: results of a twenty-four-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anakinra in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Patients with moderate-to-severe active RA who were receiving MTX for 6 consecutive months, with stable doses for > or = 3 months (those with disease duration of >6 months but <12 years) were randomized into 6 groups: placebo or 0.04, 0.1, 0.4, 1.0, or 2.0 mg/kg of anakinra administered in a single, daily, subcutaneous injection. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of subjects who met the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (attained an ACR20 response) at week 12. RESULTS: A total of 419 patients were randomized in the study. Patient demographics and disease status were similar in the 6 treatment groups. The ACR20 responses at week 12 in the 5 active treatment plus MTX groups demonstrated a statistically significant (P = 0.001) dose-response relationship compared with the ACR20 response in the placebo plus MTX group. The ACR20 response rate in the anakinra 1.0-mg/kg (46%; P = 0.001) and 2.0-mg/kg (38%; P = 0.007) dose groups was significantly greater than that in the placebo group (19%). The ACR20 responses at 24 weeks were consistent with those at 12 weeks. Similar improvements in anakinra-treated subjects were noted in individual ACR components, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, onset of ACR20 response, sustainability of ACR20 response, and magnitude of ACR response. Anakinra was safe and well tolerated. Injection site reaction was the most frequently noted adverse event, and this led to premature study withdrawal in 7% (1.0-mg/kg group) to 10% (2.0-mg/kg group) of patients receiving higher doses. CONCLUSION: In patients with persistently active RA, the combination of anakinra and MTX was safe and well tolerated and provided significantly greater clinical benefit than MTX alone.     

Alefacept in combination with methotrexate for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of alefacept in combination with methotrexate (MTX) for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Patients were eligible for this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial if they were ages 18-70 years and had active PsA (> or = 3 swollen joints and > or = 3 tender joints) despite treatment with MTX for > or = 3 months (a stable dosage for > or = 4 weeks prior to enrollment). Patients were stratified according to psoriasis body surface area (BSA) involvement (> or = 3% or < 3%). Alefacept (15 mg) or placebo was administered intramuscularly once weekly for 12 weeks in combination with MTX, followed by 12 weeks of observation during which only MTX treatment was continued. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients achieving a 20% improvement in disease activity according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria (an ACR20 response) at week 24. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-five patients were randomly assigned to receive alefacept plus MTX (n = 123) or placebo plus MTX (n = 62). At week 24, 54% of patients in the alefacept plus MTX group achieved an ACR20 response, compared with 23% of patients in the placebo plus MTX group (P < 0.001). Mean reductions in tender and swollen joint counts in patients receiving alefacept plus MTX were -8.0 and -6.3, respectively. In patients with psoriasis involving > or = 3% BSA (n = 87), a 50% reduction from the baseline Psoriasis Area Severity Index at week 14 was achieved by 53% of patients receiving alefacept plus MTX compared with 17% of those receiving placebo plus MTX (P < 0.001). Most adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. In the alefacept plus MTX group, the incidence of serious adverse events was low (1.6%), and no opportunistic infections or malignancies were reported. CONCLUSION: Alefacept in combination with MTX may be an effective and safe treatment for PsA.     

Combination of infliximab and methotrexate therapy for early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To compare the benefits of initiating treatment with methotrexate (MTX) and infliximab (anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha [anti-TNFalpha] monoclonal antibody) with those of MTX treatment alone in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) of < or =3 years' duration. METHODS: RA patients were eligible if they had active disease and no prior treatment with MTX or a TNFalpha inhibitor. One thousand forty-nine patients were randomly assigned in a 4:5:5 ratio to 3 treatment groups: MTX-placebo, MTX-3 mg/kg infliximab, and MTX-6 mg/kg infliximab. MTX dosages were rapidly escalated to 20 mg/week, and infliximab or placebo infusions were given at weeks 0, 2, and 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter through week 46. RESULTS: At week 54, the median percentage of American College of Rheumatology improvement (ACR-N) was higher for the MTX-3 mg/kg infliximab and MTX-6 mg/kg infliximab groups than for the MTX-placebo group (38.9% and 46.7% versus 26.4%, respectively; P < 0.001 for both comparisons). Patients in the MTX-3 mg/kg infliximab and MTX-6 mg/kg infliximab groups also showed less radiographic progression than those receiving MTX alone (mean +/- SD changes in van der Heijde modification of the total Sharp score at week 54: 0.4 +/- 5.8 and 0.5 +/- 5.6 versus 3.7 +/- 9.6, respectively; P < 0.001 for each comparison). In addition, physical function improved significantly more in the MTX-3 mg/kg infliximab and MTX-6 mg/kg infliximab groups than in the MTX-placebo group. Infliximab therapy was associated with a significantly higher incidence of serious infections, especially pneumonia. CONCLUSION: For patients with active RA in its early stages, combination therapy with MTX and infliximab provides greater clinical, radiographic, and functional benefits than treatment with MTX alone.     

IgG and IgM anticardiolipin antibodies following treatment with infliximab plus methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To assess the occurrence of anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving treatment with infliximab plus methotrexate (MTX) versus MTX alone. METHODS: The first 299 patients enrolled in the randomized, Active-Controlled Study of Patients Receiving Infliximab for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis of Early Onset (ASPIRE) trial who had baseline (week 0) samples available for aCL testing were included in this study. Sera were collected at weeks 0, 30, and 54 from 110 patients taking infliximab 3 mg/kg plus MTX, 98 patients taking infliximab 6 mg/kg plus MTX, and 91 patients taking placebo plus MTX. IgG and IgM aCL were measured using an anticardiolipin assay. RESULTS: IgG and IgM aCL positivity at baseline was similar in all treatment groups. Most patients were negative for IgG aCL at baseline and remained so at the last followup evaluation. One percent (2 of 208) of patients who received infliximab plus MTX and were negative for IgG aCL at baseline were positive for IgG aCL at weeks 30 and 54. A slightly higher proportion of patients who received infliximab plus MTX and were negative for IgM aCL at baseline were positive for IgM aCL at weeks 30 and 54 (4.8% [10 of 208]) as compared with patients who received placebo plus MTX (1.1% [1 of 91]), but the difference was not significant. CONCLUSION: There was a low incidence of the development of aCL in patients with early RA who received infliximab in combination with MTX, and the difference was not significant compared with patients who received placebo plus MTX.     

Dose escalation of parenteral methotrexate in active rheumatoid arthritis that has been unresponsive to conventional doses of methotrexate: a randomized, controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether dose escalation of intramuscular (IM) methotrexate (MTX) up to 45 mg/week improves disease control in patients who have active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite receiving conventional doses (15 mg/week) of IM MTX, and to obtain preliminary data on patient tolerability and adverse effects of higher doses of IM MTX. METHODS: Patients >18 years of age who had active RA, defined as a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) of >3.2, and who had received 15-20 mg/week of oral MTX for at least 2 months were switched (week 0) to 15 mg/week of IM MTX for 6 weeks. Patients whose DAS28 remained >3.2 at both week 4 and week 6 were randomized, in a double-blind manner, either to continue to receive 15 mg/week IM MTX with monthly placebo escalation or to receive escalating doses of IM MTX monthly up to 45 mg/week. The dose of MTX or placebo was escalated every 4 weeks if the DAS28 was >2.5. Safety assessments and determination of the DAS28 were performed every 2 weeks and monthly, respectively. Disease activity parameters from the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) core disease activity set and health status as recorded on the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 12 were determined at baseline (week 0) and final assessment (week 22). The primary outcome was the percentage of patients in each group achieving a target DAS28 of <3.2. Secondary outcomes comprised the percentage of patients whose DAS28 improved by >1.2, the percentage of patients achieving a 20% improvement in the ACR core disease activity measures (ACR20), and the percentage of patients achieving a good response, a moderate response, or no response in accordance with the EULAR response criteria. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were eligible for entry and were switched from oral MTX to 15 mg/week IM MTX. At baseline, the mean +/- SD DAS28 was 5.6 +/- 0.88; after 6 weeks of IM MTX, the DAS28 had improved by a mean of 0.42 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.15-0.69). At 6 weeks, 54 patients still had a DAS28 of >3.2 and were therefore eligible for randomization. By 22 weeks, 1 patient (3.7%) in each group achieved the primary outcome of a DAS28 <3.2 (95% CI for the difference between the groups -15% to +15%). Five patients (18.5%) in each group showed an improvement of >1.2 in the DAS28 (95% CI for the difference between the groups -18% to +18%). One patient (3.7%) in each group achieved an ACR20 response, but none achieved a good response as defined by the EULAR response criteria. One patient in each group had a serious adverse reaction; minor adverse reactions were more frequently reported in the dose escalation group. CONCLUSION: Switching from oral to parenteral MTX 15 mg/week results in a minor improvement in disease control. For patients with active RA receiving 15 mg/week IM MTX, increasing the dose up to 45 mg/week does not improve disease control. Higher doses of IM MTX were generally well tolerated and not associated with an increase in serious adverse reactions to the drug.     

Clinical efficacy,radiographic progression,and safety through 156 weeks of therapy with subcutaneous golimumab in combination with methotrexate in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite prior methotrexate therapy: final results of the randomized GO-FORTH trial

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of golimumab?+?methotrexate (MTX) in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: Japanese patients with active RA despite MTX were randomized to placebo?+?MTX (Group 1, n?=?88), golimumab 50?mg?+?MTX (Group 2, n?=?86), or golimumab 100?mg?+?MTX (Group 3, n?=?87). Patients with?<20% improvement in swollen/tender joint counts entered early escape at week 16. At week 24, all remaining placebo patients crossed over to golimumab 50?mg. Efficacy assessments included ACR20, DAS28-ESR, and HAQ-DI. Radiographic progression was assessed with the van der Heijde-modified Sharp (vdH-S) score.

Results: ACR20 response rates in Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3 were 67.9, 86.1, and 82.4%, respectively, at week 52 and were maintained through week 104 (87.1, 94.0, and 88.7%) and week 156 (97.1, 94.1, and 89.5%). Proportions of patients with good/moderate DAS28-ESR response or clinically meaningful improvement in HAQ-DI were also maintained through week 156. The majority of patients did not experience radiographic progression through week 156. Among 257 golimumab-treated patients, 251 (97.7%) had?≥1 AE; 54 (21.0%) had?≥1 serious AE through week 156. Infections were the most common type of AE.

Conclusions: Response to golimumab?+?MTX was maintained over 3 years in Japanese patients with active RA despite MTX. Safety results were consistent with the known safety profile of golimumab.     

Treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized magnetic resonance imaging study comparing the effects of methotrexate alone, methotrexate in combination with infliximab, and methotrexate in combination with intravenous pulse methylprednisolone

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of methotrexate (MTX), alone or in combination with intravenous (IV) methylprednisolone (MP) or infliximab, on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected synovitis, bone edema, and erosive changes in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Forty-four patients with early RA were randomized to receive MTX alone (MTX group), MTX plus IV MP (IV MP group), or MTX plus infliximab (infliximab group), infused on day 0 and weeks 2, 6, 14, 22, 30, 38, and 46. Gadolinium-enhanced MRI scans of the metacarpophalangeal joints, wrists, and metatarsophalangeal joints were performed at baseline, week 18, and week 52. RESULTS: Scores for MRI-detected synovitis and bone edema improved over time in the 3 groups, with significantly lower synovitis scores in the infliximab group compared with the MTX group and significantly lower bone edema scores in the infliximab group compared with the MTX and the IV MP groups. Scores for MRI-detected erosion significantly increased over time in all groups. There were no differences in erosion scores between the MTX group and the other groups. It is of note that patients treated with IV MP showed more significant progression in MRI-detected erosions compared with patients treated with infliximab. At week 22, response rates according to the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20), the ACR50, and the ACR70 were significantly higher in both the IV MP group and the infliximab group compared with the MTX group. At week 52, remission was achieved in 40% of patients in the MTX group and in 70% of patients in the IV MP and infliximab groups. Health Assessment Questionnaire scores improved significantly over time in all groups, with patients receiving IV MP experiencing significantly more improvement compared with patients treated with MTX alone. No severe side effects were observed, except 1 case of MTX-related pneumonitis. CONCLUSION: The combination of MTX and infliximab is superior to MTX alone for reducing MRI-detected signs of synovitis and bone edema in patients with early RA. Progression of MRI-detected erosion was greater in patients treated with MTX plus IV MP compared with that in patients who received MTX plus infliximab.     

The PREMIER study: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial of combination therapy with adalimumab plus methotrexate versus methotrexate alone or adalimumab alone in patients with early, aggressive rheumatoid arthritis who had not had previous methotrexate treatment

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of adalimumab plus methotrexate (MTX) versus MTX monotherapy or adalimumab monotherapy in patients with early, aggressive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had not previously received MTX treatment. METHODS: This was a 2-year, multicenter, double-blind, active comparator-controlled study of 799 RA patients with active disease of < 3 years' duration who had never been treated with MTX. Treatments included adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously every other week plus oral MTX, adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously every other week, or weekly oral MTX. Co-primary end points at year 1 were American College of Rheumatology 50% improvement (ACR50) and mean change from baseline in the modified total Sharp score. RESULTS: Combination therapy was superior to both MTX and adalimumab monotherapy in all outcomes measured. At year 1, more patients receiving combination therapy exhibited an ACR50 response (62%) than did patients who received MTX or adalimumab monotherapy (46% and 41%, respectively; both P < 0.001). Similar superiority of combination therapy was seen in ACR20, ACR70, and ACR90 response rates at 1 and 2 years. There was significantly less radiographic progression (P < or = 0.002) among patients in the combination treatment arm at both year 1 and year 2 (1.3 and 1.9 Sharp units, respectively) than in patients in the MTX arm (5.7 and 10.4 Sharp units) or the adalimumab arm (3.0 and 5.5 Sharp units). After 2 years of treatment, 49% of patients receiving combination therapy exhibited disease remission (28-joint Disease Activity Score <2.6), and 49% exhibited a major clinical response (ACR70 response for at least 6 continuous months), rates approximately twice those found among patients receiving either monotherapy. The adverse event profiles were comparable in all 3 groups. CONCLUSION: In this population of patients with early, aggressive RA, combination therapy with adalimumab plus MTX was significantly superior to either MTX alone or adalimumab alone in improving signs and symptoms of disease, inhibiting radiographic progression, and effecting clinical remission.     

Adalimumab,a fully human anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody,for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in patients taking concomitant methotrexate: the ARMADA trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab (D2E7), a fully human monoclonal tumor necrosis factor alpha antibody, in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite treatment with MTX. METHODS: In a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 271 patients with active RA were randomly assigned to receive injections of adalimumab (20 mg, 40 mg, or 80 mg subcutaneously) or placebo every other week while continuing to take their long-term stable dosage of MTX. The primary efficacy end point was the American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20) at 24 weeks. RESULTS: An ACR20 response at week 24 was achieved by a significantly greater proportion of patients in the 20-mg, 40-mg, and 80-mg adalimumab plus MTX groups (47.8%, 67.2%, and 65.8%, respectively) than in the placebo plus MTX group (14.5%) (P < 0.001). ACR50 response rates with the 20-mg, 40-mg, and 80-mg adalimumab dosages (31.9%, 55.2%, and 42.5%, respectively) were significantly greater than that with placebo (8.1%) (P = 0.003, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). The 40-mg and 80-mg doses of adalimumab were associated with an ACR70 response (26.9% and 19.2%, respectively) that was statistically significantly greater than that with placebo (4.8%) (P < 0.001 and P = 0.020). Responses were rapid, with the greatest proportion of adalimumab-treated patients achieving an ACR20 response at the first scheduled visit (week 1). Adalimumab was safe and well tolerated; comparable numbers of adalimumab-treated patients and placebo-treated patients reported adverse events. CONCLUSION: The addition of adalimumab at a dosage of 20 mg, 40 mg, or 80 mg administered subcutaneously every other week to long-term MTX therapy in patients with active RA provided significant, rapid, and sustained improvement in disease activity over 24 weeks compared with MTX plus placebo.     

Chimeric anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha monoclonal antibody treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving methotrexate therapy

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of single and multiple doses of a chimeric anti-TNF-alpha monoclonal antibody (infliximab) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had active disease despite therapy with methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with active RA despite receiving therapy with 10 mg/week of MTX were randomized to receive a single, blinded infusion of either placebo or 5, 10, or 20 mg/kg infliximab. Twenty-three patients who completed the blinded study entered an open, multiple dose extension study in which they received up to 3 additional infusions of 10 mg/kg infliximab at Weeks 12, 20, and 28. Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics were evaluated during the blinded and open trial. RESULTS: There were no serious infusion related reactions. In the blinded phase, 17 (81.0%) of 21 patients receiving infliximab achieved an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% response at some point during the 12 weeks of followup compared to one (14.3%) of 7 patients receiving placebo (p = 0.003). Clinical improvement was evident by the first week and was sustained through Week 12. For the 19 patients who received infliximab during the blinded part of the trial and continued into the open label trial, 53% maintained an ACR 20% response with multiple infusions of 10 mg/kg infliximab through Week 40. Three patients withdrew from the trial during the open continuation phase because of adverse events: cellulitis, infusion related dizziness and headache, and vasculitic rash. Infliximab in doses of 5 to 20 mg/kg had a mean terminal half-life ranging from 9 to 12 days and was detectable in sera from most patients 8 to 12 weeks after dosing. CONCLUSION: Infliximab is generally well tolerated during 40 weeks of therapy. A single infusion of 5 to 20 mg/kg infliximab significantly decreases the signs and symptoms of RA compared to placebo in patients with active disease receiving MTX. Multiple doses of infliximab produce sustained clinical benefit for up to 40 weeks.     

Comparison of ultrasonographic assessment of synovitis and joint vascularity with radiographic evaluation in a randomized, placebo-controlled study of infliximab therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To investigate sensitive ultrasonographic imaging methods for detection of synovial thickness and vascularity to discriminate between patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving infliximab + methotrexate (MTX) versus placebo + MTX over 18 weeks, and to compare the relationship between synovial thickening and vascularity at baseline and radiologic damage to joints of the hands and feet at 54 weeks. METHODS: Patients with early RA (duration <3 years) receiving stable dosages of MTX were randomly assigned to receive blinded infusions of 5 mg/kg infliximab (n = 12) or placebo (n = 12) at weeks 0, 2, 6, and then every 8 weeks until week 46. At baseline and week 18, clinical assessments were performed, and metacarpophalangeal joints were assessed by high-frequency ultrasonography and power Doppler ultrasonography measurements. Radiographs of the hands and feet taken at baseline and at 54 weeks were evaluated using the van der Heijde modification of the Sharp method (vdH-Sharp score). RESULTS: Using changes in the total vdH-Sharp score over 54 weeks and changes in synovial thickening and joint vascularity at 18 weeks, we were able to distinguish those patients receiving infusions of infliximab + MTX from those receiving placebo + MTX. Sonographic measurements of synovial thickening and vascularity at baseline in the placebo + MTX group demonstrated clear relationships with the magnitude of radiologic joint damage at week 54. Infliximab + MTX treatment abolished these relationships. CONCLUSION: The delay or reversal of inflammatory and joint-destructive mechanisms in patients with early RA was already apparent following 18 weeks of treatment with infliximab + MTX and was reflected in radiologic changes at 54 weeks.     

Secondary failure to treatment with recombinant human IL-1 receptor antagonist in Chinese patients with rheumatoid arthritis

The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of anakinra, a recombinant human interleukin 1 receptor antagonist, plus methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) refractory to MTX therapy. A total of 54 patients with active RA, who were taking MTX at a stable dosage, were randomized to receive daily subcutaneous injections of anakinra (80 mg) or placebo. Clinical outcomes were assessed every 4 weeks for 24 weeks by using the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology. After 24 weeks, more patients achieved clinical benefits as determined by the ACR20 improvement treated with anakinra plus MTX compared with MTX alone (64% vs. 17%, P = 0.004). In the anakinra group, an ACR50 response was observed in 38% and an ACR70 response in 17%. None of the patients treated with MTX alone achieved ACR50 or ACR 70 improvement. However, nine of 42 (21.4%) patients in the anakinra group, who showed therapeutic response initially, had secondary drug failure to anakinra therapy thereafter. A significant increase in mean DAS28 from baseline was found in the non-responders to anakinra compared with placebo (0.83 ± 1.38 vs. −1.28 ± 0.78, P < 0.001). Anakinra is effective in the treatment of patients with active RA by blocking IL-1. However, the efficacy of anakinra is soon lost in about one fifth of patients in spite of initial good response.