Nicotine-induced conditioned taste aversion in the rat: effects of ethanol

It has been shown that small doses of ethanol antagonise the discriminative stimulus properties of nicotine in the rat. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether ethanol could antagonise the aversive stimulus effects of nicotine. Wistar rats were trained to associate nicotine injections with a novel tasting fluid (0.1% saccharin) in the conditioned taste aversion procedure. Nicotine (0.3 mg/kg, s.c.) was injected 5 min after the end of a 20-min exposure to the saccharin solution. Ethanol (0.25-0.5 g/kg, i.p.) was administered 5 or 50 min before nicotine. In general, ethanol did not inhibit nicotine-induced conditioned taste aversion. Contrary to the findings in drug discrimination studies, a slight but significant enhancement of nicotine-induced taste aversion conditioning was observed after ethanol pre-treatment. Blood ethanol levels were measured in a separate group of rats. Maximal blood ethanol levels after i.p. administration of 0.25 or 0.5 g/kg ethanol exceeded 20 and 80 mg%, respectively. Concluding, the present results may indicate that ethanol does not attenuate nicotine-induced conditioned taste aversion in the rat.     

Acute behavioral tolerance to nicotine in the conditioned taste aversion paradigm

Acute behavioral tolerance to nicotine is a well‐established phenomenon in animals, although previous drug discrimination studies have suggested that subpopulations of rats may exist that fail to exhibit acute tolerance to nicotine. The present study sought to determine whether these findings might extend to the conditioned taste aversion (CTA) paradigm. In experiment 1, rats were administered 0.8 mg/kg s.c. nicotine or vehicle before a pairing session with saccharin, and then administered either 0.4 mg/kg nicotine or vehicle immediately afterward. Rats treated with vehicle pre‐session and then nicotine post‐session developed a significant CTA to nicotine, whereas rats treated with 0.8 mg/kg nicotine s.c. pre‐session failed to develop a CTA to nicotine. In experiment 2, rats were identified as exhibiting or failing to exhibit acute tolerance to nicotine in a drug discrimination paradigm. Rats that produced acute nicotine tolerance failed to develop a CTA after 24 h, but did so after 48 h, while rats that did not produce nicotine tolerance exhibited CTA after 24 h, but not after 48 h. These findings indicate that acute behavioral tolerance to nicotine extends to its aversion effects. Drug Dev Res 68:522–528, 2007. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Discriminative stimulus properties of indorenate in a conditioned taste aversion paradigm

Indorenate (5-methoxytryptamine beta-methylcarboxylate, INDO) is a serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) agonist that has affinity for 5-HT(1A/1B/2C) receptors. It possesses anxiolytic and antihypertensive actions mediated by 5-HT(1A) receptors and anorectic activity mediated by 5-HT(2C/1B) receptors. This study examined whether INDO may exert discriminative control using a conditioned taste aversion (CTA) paradigm, and whether differential participation of 5-HT receptor subtypes may be involved in its cue. Male Wistar rats trained to drink their daily water in a 30-min period were trained to discriminate INDO from saline. One group received the intraperitoneal administration of INDO (10.0 mg/kg) before saccharin-LiCl pairings; on alternate days, rats received saline before the saccharin-saline pairings (Group D(+)S(-)). The other group had the contingencies reversed (i.e., the administration of INDO preceded saccharin-saline pairings: Group D(-)S(+)). In two-bottle generalization tests (one bottle containing saccharin, the other plain water), the preference for saccharin was evaluated after different doses of INDO, [3H]-8-hydroxy-2-(di-N-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) (5-HT(1A)), buspirone (5-HT(1A)), RU24969 (5-HT(1A/1B)), TFMPP (5-HT(1B/2C)), MK212 (5-HT(2C)), alpha-Me-5-HT (5-HT(2C/2A)), 2-Me-5-HT (5-HT(3)) and cisapride (5-HT(4)). The results showed that INDO, RU24969, TFMPP, alpha-Me-5-HT and MK 212 produced a dose-dependent generalization; 8-OH-DPAT and buspirone produced only partial generalization, while 2-Me-5-HT and cisapride did not produce generalization. The results indicate that INDO administration may exert discriminative control over saccharin preference mediated mainly by 5-HT(1B/2C) receptors, but with an important contribution of 5-HT(1A) receptors.     

Isolation housing decreases the effectiveness of morphine in the conditioned taste aversion paradigm

Male Long Evans rats were obtained at 21 days of age and were housed in either an aggregated (four per double cage) or isolated (one per single cage) condition for 6 weeks. They were then placed on a fluid deprivation schedule that allowed them access to fluids for 20 min daily. This schedule was maintained for the remainder of the experiment. Following habituation, sensitivity to morphine-induced conditioned taste aversion (CTA) was compared in the differentially housed rats. On the 1st day and every 5 days thereafter the rats were presented with a 0.1% solution of sodium saccharin for the 20-min drinking period, followed immediately by an injection of morphine (0, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0, or 20.0 mg/kg). On intervening days they received water as the fluid. No drugs were given on these days. There was no difference in baseline saccharin consumption as a function of housing condition. In comparison with the isolated rats, the grouped animals were more sensitive to the CTA-inducing properties of low doses of morphine. These data strengthen the already existing evidence for the influence of the early housing environment on drug sensitivity and provide additional support for the conclusion that variability in response to a number of drugs of abuse can be reduced by environmental means. Possible mechanisms for the differences between isolation and aggregation housed rats are discussed.     

Conditioned taste aversion and conditioned drinking: Two independent and opposing effects of 5-hydroxytryptophan?

Four experiments were carried out to examine the effects of 5-HTP in a conditioned taste aversion (CTA) paradigm. Using two-choice tests to measure the CTA, administration of 5-HTP following consumption of a novel flavour caused aversions to saline and saccharin solutions. In single-choice tests 5-HTP reduced consumption of saccharin, sugar cubes and beef-flavoured stock cubes, but only reduced saline consumption if animals had been pretreated with the 5-HTP decarboxylase inhibitor benserazide or the 5-HT receptor antagonist xylamidine, both of which act peripherally. Benserazide did not attenuate the CTA in any experiment. The results are interpreted in terms of two competing behavioural effects of 5-HTP: a centrally-mediated CTA and a peripherally-mediated conditioned drinking response.     

5-Hydroxytryptophan-induced conditioned taste aversion to ethanol in the rat

This experiment was conducted to determine the efficacy of 5-HTP in producing conditioned taste aversions (CTAs) to ethanol in rats restricted to a one-hour daily access to fluid. Administration of 100 mg/kg of DL-5-HTP immediately following novel exposure to ethanol resulted in an aversion of such magnitude that some rats refused to consume the ethanol solution. Since ethanol was the only fluid available to these rats, they eventually died, presumably of dehydration. By comparison, LiCl administration also produced a CTA to ethanol, but no such persistent rejection was observed. Both 5-HTP and LiCl also produced CTAs when saccharin and tartaric acid solutions were used as novel fluids, but these aversions were short-lived and all rats resumed drinking. The causative factor(s) in the persistent ethanol rejection until death observed in rats treated with 5-HTP remain undetermined but the results have indicated that simple CS-UCS associative learning mechanisms are probably not a primary causative factor.     

Effects of atropine on conditioned taste aversion

Atropine sulfate, which has a deleterious effect on various learning tasks, was found to have a similar effect on the acquisition of conditioned taste aversion. Thus, intraperitoneal injection of atropine sulfate shortly before tasting was found to interfere with conditioning of the aversion, but injection of atropine after tasting did not. The interference effect was also obtained with intraventricular administration of atropine sulfate, but not with intraperitoneal injection of the peripherally-acting atropine methylnitrate. These results show that central rather than peripheral mechanisms are involved in this effect, and suggest that conditioned taste aversion, like other kinds of learning, involves cholinergic mediation.     

Time-dependent retrograde amnesic effects of muscimol on conditioned taste aversion extinction

We explored how stimulation of GABA_A receptors at different times during conditioned taste aversion (CTA) acquisition or extinction influenced extinction. In Experiment 1, rats acquired a CTA to 0.3% saccharin-flavored water (SAC) when it followed an injection of lithium chloride (LiCl; 81.0 mg/kg, i.p.). Following conditioning, rats received extinction training in which the GABA_A agonist muscimol (1.0 mg/kg, i.p.), or control (saline) injections, were administered either before or after each extinction trial. Muscimol hindered extinction when administered after extinction trials. Muscimol's inhibitory effects may have impeded extinction learning by disrupting synaptic mechanisms required to consolidate information experienced during extinction training. In Experiment 2, we studied the effects of muscimol on CTA acquisition and subsequent extinction. Rats received muscimol (1.0 mg/kg, i.p.) either before or after CTA conditioning trials. Following CTA acquisition, all rats were given CTA extinction training without muscimol administration. All groups developed CTA, but the group that received muscimol before CTA conditioning trials extinguished rapidly in comparison to other treatment groups. Differences between muscimol's effects on CTA conditioning and CTA extinction indicate that fear conditioning and extinction involve, to some degree, different neuronal mechanisms.     

Enduring effects of morphine pellets revealed by conditioned taste aversion

Morphine pellets (75 mg) were implanted subcutaneously in albino rats. Three days later, following 24 h without water, these rats (Group MSN) were given access to a saccharin solution for 30 min, then injected with naloxone hydrochloride. The classical abstinence signs, including wet dog shakes and weight loss, were noted in these subjects, but not in controls given placebo pellets and/or saline injections. In addition, when given an opportunity to drink either saccharine solution or water 24 h later, Group MSN rats drank significantly less saccharin than any of the control groups. Similar drinking patterns were found even when naloxone injection was delayed as long as 3 weeks after pellet implantation, when none of the classical abstinence signs were seen and serum levels of morphine and its metabolites were 100 times lower according to radioimmunoassay. This simple and objective technique is thus more sensitive as a measure of prior morphine exposure than any of the commonly used indices. The continued utility of a dependent-nondependent dichotomy is also examined in light of these and other findings.     

Antiaversive properties of opioids in the conditioned taste aversion test in the rat

The antiaversive effect of mu-, kappa- and delta-opioid receptor agonists against conditioned taste aversion (CTA) induced by apomorphine, lithium chloride and copper sulphate in the rat was studied, in order to evaluate whether prevention of CTA is a suitable model for the study of antiemetics. Anti-aversion was not a general characteristic of all opioid substances tested. Only one dose of the mu-agonist morphine and only one dose of the kappa-agonist ethylketocyclazocine had a consistent antiaversive effect against CTA induced by apomorphine; one dose of the delta-agonist [D-Ala2, Met5]enkephalinamide antagonized the aversion induced by lithium chloride. As the results do not correspond to our previous findings on the antiemetic effects of these opioids in the dog (all mu- and kappa-agonists tested having an antiemetic effect), we conclude that the CTA test cannot be used as a screening test for potentially antiemetic drugs.     

Caffeine promotes an ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion: a dose-dependent interaction

The present study examined whether caffeine administered within a dose range previously shown to promote ethanol drinking would also alter an ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion (CTA). The results revealed a dose-dependent interaction between caffeine and ethanol where caffeine (2.5 and 10 mg/kg) promoted an ethanol-induced CTA at a low ethanol dose (1.0 g/kg) but had no effect in blocking CTA at the higher ethanol dose (1.5 g/kg). These results were found to be unrelated to an alteration in ethanol metabolism, as caffeine had no effect in altering blood ethanol levels at the doses tested. In agreement with the reward comparison hypothesis, the present results suggest that rather than attenuate ethanol's "aversive" effects, caffeine may have promoted an ethanol-induced CTA by increasing the reinforcing efficacy of ethanol.     

The role of mesolimbic and nigrostriatal dopamine in latent inhibition as measured with the conditioned taste aversion paradigm

Repeatedly presenting a non-reinforced stimulus normally retards conditioning to this stimulus when it is coupled to a reinforcer. This phenomenon is called latent inhibition. Since latent inhibition is disturbed after systemic administration of amphetamine, the present study investigated the role of the mesolimbic and nigrostriatal dopamine terminal fields in latent inhibition using a conditioned taste aversion (CTA) paradigm. In this paradigm, a 5% sucrose solution was used as the test stimulus and lithium chloride (LiCl) as the CTA inducing drug. The degree of CTA was assessed by measuring the sucrose preference in a two-bottle sucrose/water choice paradigm 24 h after the LiCl injection. Since conditioned taste aversion has so far not been used to evaluate the role of dopamine in latent inhibition, we first studied the effects of systemic application of amphetamine. The results show that intraperitoneal injections of 0.25 or 0.5 mg/kg d-amphetamine sulphate (given at preexposure and conditioning) significantly disrupted latent inhibition, by selectively reducing sucrose preference in the preexposed group. This could not be attributed to a reduced sucrose intake during preexposure or to a conditioned taste aversion effect of amphetamine itself. In experiment 2 local bilateral administration of 10 μg/0.5 μl amphetamine into the nucleus accumbens or the dorsal striatum was given in the pre-exposed and the conditioning phase, after which the rats were allowed to drink for a fixed period of time. The results show a significant reduction in latent inhibition after intrastriatal, but not after intra-accumbens injections of amphetamine. Intra-accumbens injections of amphetamine, however, significantly reduced fluid intake during preexposure and conditioning. In experiment 3, we therefore repeated this experiment, but allowed the animals to drink only a restricted amount of liquid during preexposure and conditioning. Again the results show a disruption of latent inhibition after intrastriatal, but not intra-accumbens injections of amphetamine. These experiments emphasize the importance of the nigrostriatal dopamine system in the disruption of latent inhibition, at least when using the conditioned taste aversion paradigm. A possible mechanism by which the dorsal striatum might influence latent inhibition is discussed. Received: 22 November 1995 /Final version: 20 August 1996     

Hormonal influences on the extinction of conditioned taste aversion

Conditioned taste aversion for a 5% glucose solution (sugar water) was induced in rats by an i.p. injection of LiCl 30 min after the first presentation of sugar water. Extinction of conditioned taste aversion was measured either in the forced-drinking test or in the preference-drinking test. In the forced-drinking test sugar water was the only fluid presented to the animals during extinction sessions. In the preference-drinking test the animals had the choice of tap water or sugar water. The rate of extinction was much slower in the preference test.The ACTH-analogues, ACTH_4–10 and ACTH_{4–10 7D Phe}, and -MSH delayed extinction in the preference test but not extinction in the forced-drinking test. ACTH_11–24 was without any effect. MSH-release inhibiting factor (MIF) facilitated extinction in the forced-drinking test but did not alter extinction in the preference test. The peptides did not affect intake of tap water or preference of sugar water over tap water by control rats.     

Effects of pimozide on the acquisition,maintenance, and extinction of an amphetamine-induced taste aversion

Under second-order schedules of morphine injection, high rates of responding by squirrel and rhesus monkeys were maintained when morphine was injected intravenously only at the end of each session. Every 30th key-pressing response during a 60-min interval produced a 2-s light; the first 30-response component completed after 60 min produced both the light and intravenous injection of morphine. A mean rate of approximately one response per second was maintained by doses of morphine ranging from 0.75–1.5 mg/kg. A pause in responding after each light presentation was followed by rapid responding until the light was produced again; pauses became shorter as the 60-min interval progressed. When brief light presentations were omitted, but morphine was still injected, response rates decreased and patterns of responding were altered. When saline injections were substituted for morphine injections, but the brief light was still presented, responding decreased markedly within three to five sessions and patterns of responding were altered.This research was conducted at Harvard Medical School, Boston and the New England Regional Primate Research Center, Southborough, Massachusetts, while Dr. A. H. Tang was on leave from the Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49001, U.S.A.     

Role of hypothermia in ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion

Two experiments examined the effect of ambient temperature during ethanol exposure on development of conditioned taste aversion to saccharin. In both studies, male albino rats receiving saccharin-ethanol (1.5 g/kg, IP) pairings followed by 6-h exposure to a 32° C environment developed a weaker saccharin aversion than did rats experiencing ethanol at room temperature. Exposure to the warm environment reduced ethanol-induced hypothermia, but enhanced ethanol's motor-impairing effect. The influence of ambient temperature on ethanol-induced taste aversion may be due to changes in body temperature, neural sensitivity, or elimination rate. Although alternative accounts cannot be entirely dismissed, this outcome suggests that ethanol-induced hypothermia plays a role in determining strength of conditioned taste aversion and thus may be involved in the regulation of oral ethanol intake in rats. Offprint requests to: C.L. Cunningham     

Bupropion, d-amphetamine, and amitriptyline-induced conditioned taste aversion in rats: dose effects

Nine groups of rats (n = 6 per group) were adapted to a daily one-half hour period of water availability. When intake had stabilized, they were allowed access to a 0.1% (w/v) solution of saccharin, and immediately afterward were given IP injections of isotonic saline; bupropion HCl (10.0, 20.0, or 40.0 mg/kg); d-amphetamine-sulfate (0.5, 1.0, 2.0 mg/kg); or amitriptyline HCl (5.0, 10.0, or 20.0 mg/kg) in a volume of 1 ml. The lowest dose of each compound as chosen to be equipotent in screening tests used to identify potential antidepressants. Following 2 days of access to water alone, all groups were given a choice between water and saccharin for 3 consecutive days. All compounds induced taste aversions in a dose-related manner, but amitriptyline induced greater and longer-lasting aversions than either bupropion or d-amphetamine which were equipotent over the dose range studied. As such, this is the first demonstration that bupropion and amitriptyline, two clinically effective antidepressants, can induce taste aversions and replicates as well the common finding that d-amphetamine has substantial taste aversion-inducing properties. The ability of these compounds to induce taste aversions could be mediated through their effects on central catecholaminergic processes although amitriptyline has significant peripheral anticholinergic effects.     

Differential effects on conditioned taste aversion learning with peripherally and centrally administered acetaldehyde

Acetaldehyde, the primary metabolite of ethanol, produces a variety of aversive symptoms when present in the body in high concentrations. Laboratory rats were able to learn to associate a novel tasting saccharin solution with the toxic effects of an intraperitoneal injection of acetaldehyde. However, when the acetaldehyde was administered intracerebroventricularly, there was no manifestation of a conditioned avoidance of the saccharin taste. It is suggested that the aversive effects of acetaldehyde are mediated by peripheral toxicosis rather than by the pharmacological actions of acetaldehyde in the brain.     

Buspirone antagonizes the expression of conditioned taste aversion in rats

When the parameters of taste aversion conditioning and testing have been appropriately adjusted, benzodiazepines and barbiturates will markedly antagonize the expression of moderate taste aversions in rats. We call this the taste aversion conflict model of anxiety. In the present study, we investigate whether buspirone HCl (buspirone; p.o. and i.p.) is active in the taste aversion conflict model and whether buspirone will also increase unsuppressed saccharin (SACC) intake. We also investigated the effects of imipramine, desipramine, phenelzine sulfate, chlorpromazine, scopolamine and d-amphetamine sulfate in the taste aversion conflict model. To assess the possible effects of buspirone on the GABA-benzodiazepine supramolecular receptor complex, we compared buspirone with certain benzodiazepines, meprobamate and sodium phenobarbital on the antagonism of pentylenetetrazol-induced lethality in mice. Unlike benzodiazepines, meprobamate and phenobarbital, buspirone did not antagonize pentylenetetrazol-induced lethality. However, like those other anxiolytics, buspirone markedly antagonized the expression of conditioned taste aversion. All nonanxiolytic drugs tested had either no effect or very slight effects on the expression of conditioned taste aversion. These results suggest that the taste aversion conflict model is sensitive to novel anxiolytics and that it is selective for drugs clinically effective in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorders in man.