Living related kidney donors over 60 years old

The lack of available cadaveric organs for transplantation has resulted in an increased number of kidney transplants from living donors. During a period of 6 years, 149 kidney transplantations were performed from living related donors in our institute, 33.5% of whom were older than 60 years of age. In this study we examined the survival of patients and grafts as well as the graft function in 50 patients with transplants from donors over 60 years (mean age 65 years) as compared with those of 99 patients with transplants from donors younger than 60 years (mean age 47 years). There were no significant differences in the course of donor nephrectomy, postoperative complications, or remnant kidney function. However, delayed graft function occurred more frequently in recipients of transplants from older donors. Improvement in graft function was also slower in recipients of kidneys from older donors, with significant differences in serum creatinine levels observed during the first 12 months after transplantation. More frequent acute complications and more progressive chronic graft failure, irrespective of the causes, occurred during the 1st post-transplant year in recipients with grafts from older donors. Five-year patient survival (77% vs 92%) and kidney graft survival differed significantly for the same period with worse results for patients receiving grafts from older donors. It may be concluded that kidney grafts from donors older than 60 years — and especially those older than 70 years — may be used for living related kidney transplantation, but with precautions.     

The use of older donor livers for hepatic transplantation

The function and outcome of liver grafts from "older" donors (more than 50 years old) were compared with grafts from younger donors (less than 50 years old). Of 184 consecutive liver transplants, 23 grafts were from older donors (50.2-65.3 years, mean 54.3 years). The liver preservation period was short, averaging less than 4 hr with the maximum under 8 hr for the older grafts. The majority of livers were preserved with Collins' solution. All transplants were performed using consistent methods that had proved to be successful over time. The medical status of the patients who received the older and younger grafts was similar but a higher percentage of older grafts were transplanted into ABO blood group--incompatible recipients. Graft function--as determined by peak aminotransferase levels, duration of prolonged prothrombin time, retransplantation rate within 30 days and incidence of primary nonfunction--was not significantly different in older versus younger grafts. Actual 30-day graft survival was 86.9% in the older grafts and 85.1% in the younger grafts. Actuarial 1-year graft and patient survival rates were 65.0% and 71.4%, respectively, in recipients of older grafts and 68.8% and 75.6%, respectively, in recipients of younger grafts. It is concluded that donor livers older than 50 years can be transplanted with the same success as younger livers provided that other generally accepted donor criteria are satisfied and the preservation period is short. The upper age limit for liver donation is not yet known.     

Enhanced Significance of Donor–Recipient Age Gradient as a Prognostic Factor of Graft Outcome in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation

Background

Successful kidney transplantation (KT) increases survival and improves quality of life for patients with end-stage renal disease. Donor age is an important factor influencing graft outcomes. We evaluated the relationship between the donor–recipient age gradient (DRAG) and graft outcomes after living-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). Additionally, we analyzed graft survival in patients receiving kidneys from age-mismatched donors.

Methods

From February 1995 to March 2011, a series of 968 consecutive adult LDKT recipients were enrolled in our study. Graft survival and laboratory data for each patient were retrospectively collected. DRAG values were divided into four groups: ≤?21, ?20 to ?1, 0?20, and ≥21 years.

Results

Higher DRAG had negative effects on graft rejection episodes and serum creatinine levels beyond the first month post-transplantation. A DRAG of more than 20 years was significantly correlated with worse 10-year graft survival. Kidneys from donors older than 55 years of age showed significantly compromised graft outcomes when transplanted into recipients younger than 30 years of age, but not in older recipients. Graft survival in transplants using old-to-old allocation was not different from that of young-to-young allocation. In cases of older donors, a lower DRAG between older donors and older recipients showed more favorable graft outcomes than a higher DRAG between older donors and younger recipients.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that DRAG may serve as a prognostic factor for predicting graft outcomes after LDKT. Additionally, we showed that transplantation of older donor kidneys via living donation is justified in appropriately chosen age-matched recipients.     

Renal transplantation from elderly living donors

A worldwide shortage of cadaveric donors has led to the increased utilization of elderly living donors, with controversial results. In an attempt to assess the effect of donor age on graft survival and subsequent renal function, we analyzed our clinical results in 276 consecutive recipients of living related renal transplants spanning both the cyclosporine and the azathioprine eras, of whom a total of 44 recipients received kidneys from donors over 55 years old. All recipients were otherwise similar in age, race, haplotype mismatch, number of retransplants, and number of pretransplant transfusions, apart from an increased number of diabetics among the CsA-treated recipients of elderly kidneys (38% vs. 14%). The cumulative patient and graft survival rates at 1 and 5 years were independent of donor age whether CsA or AZA was utilized. Nor was the incidence of rejection or infection significantly different in the older donor group when compared with the younger cohort. Short-term and intermediate-term renal function, as assessed by serum creatinine, was however poorer but stable in the older donor group when compared with the younger one. The mean serum creatinine levels at 1 year in the CsA- and AZA-treated recipients of kidneys from older donors were 2.4 and 2.0 mg/dl, respectively, compared with 1.6 and 1.4 mg/dl, respectively, when the donor age was less than 55 years (P less than 0.001). Since renal function at the end of the first posttransplant year is considered a determinant of long-term graft survival, this is a cause for concern, but in view of the universal shortage of organs and the negligible morbidity to donors, renal transplantation from elderly living donors remains an acceptable practice.     

Should kidneys from older cadaveric donors be age-matched to the recipient?

Persistent shortage of kidneys for transplantation has forced most transplant centers to include procurement and use of kidneys from older donors. It is not clear whether the optimal use of these kidneys involve age-matching to the recipient. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of older cadaveric kidneys (>60 years), transplanted to young recipients (<50 years) and older recipients (>60 years). From 1989 through 2002, 252 first kidney grafts were procured from donors above the age of 60; 149 of the recipients to these grafts were above 60 years and 45 recipients were below 50. Minimum follow-up time was 12 months. Variables for waiting time to transplantation, DR mismatches, PRA, dialysis prior to transplantation, episodes of acute rejection, number of steroid-resistant rejections, creatinine levels, cold ischemia time, and causes of graft loss did not differ between the two groups. There was no significant difference in graft survival for young and older recipients receiving kidney from donors above 60 years of age. Graft survival at 1 year for young recipients was 90% and for older recipients 93% (NS). Five-year graft survival was 72% and 79%, respectively (NS). However, there was a significant positive effect on long-term graft survival if the donor kidney was less than 50 years. From our data, there is no evidence that age-matching of older donors has any beneficial effect on graft survival in kidney transplantation.     

Outcomes of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: a single institution's experience with 335 consecutive cases

OBJECTIVE: To determine outcomes for both donors and recipients of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (AALDLT) and independent factors impacting those outcomes. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Deceased donors for organ transplantation remain extremely rare, making living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) practically the sole therapeutic modality for patients with end-stage liver disease in Japan. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of initial LDLT for 335 consecutive adult (>or=18 years) patients performed between November 1994 and December 2003. RESULTS:: Of the 335 recipients, 275 received right-liver grafts and the remaining 60 recipients received non-right-liver grafts. Three of the 335 liver grafts were domino-splitting livers. Sixty of the 332 donors other than the domino-donors showed major postoperative complications. Multivariate analysis indicated that accumulation of case experience significantly and advantageously affected the surgical outcomes of these living liver donors, and right-liver donation and prolonged donor operation time were shown to be independent risk factors of major complications in the donors. Post-transplant patient and graft survival estimates were 73.1% and 72.5% at 1 year, 67.7% and 66.3% at 4 years, and 64.7% and 61.9% at 7 years, respectively. Obvious pretransplant encephalopathy, a higher (>or=31) modified Model for End-stage Liver Disease score (including points for persistent ascites and low serum sodium) and higher donor age (>or=50 years) were indicated as independent factors predictive of graft failure (graft loss or death) in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Graft type and degree of experience exerted a significant impact on the surgical outcomes of AALDLT donors but did not significantly affect the survival outcomes of AALDLT recipients. Better pretransplant conditions and younger age (<50 years) among the living donors appeared to be advantageous in terms of gaining better survival outcomes of patients undergoing AALDLT.     

Dual kidneys from marginal adult donors as a source for cadaveric renal transplantation in the United States

The current organ shortage has led to the utilization of double kidney transplants from marginal adult donors, but outcomes data are limited. The United Network for Organ Sharing registry database was used to compare the outcomes of 403 dual adult kidney transplantations (DKT) and 11,033 single kidney transplantations (SKT) from 1997 to 2000. Graft and patient survival and the effect of multiple risk factors were evaluated. It was found that DKT patients were older, less sensitized, and received grafts from older, more mismatched donors with longer cold ischemia times. There was also a greater percentage of donors with a history of diabetes or hypertension and African-American recipients and donors in the DKT group. Graft survival was inferior in the DKT group, with a 7% lower graft survival rate at 1 yr. There was a higher incidence of primary nonfunction in the DKT group, although the incidence of delayed graft function, early rejection treatment, and graft thrombosis did not differ. Multivariate analysis was used to identify African-American recipient ethnicity and retransplant as risk factors for graft loss. Graft survival was comparable in DKT and SKT with donors over 55 yr of age. DKT resulted in inferior graft outcomes compared with SKT. When compared with SKT with donors over 55 yr of age, DKT resulted in similar graft outcomes. These otherwise discarded kidneys should be cautiously considered as a source of marginal donors.     

Effect of donor age on the outcome of living-related kidney transplantation

The study compared the results of kidney transplantation from living-related donors older and younger than 60 years. The 273 kidney graft recipients were divided into group 1 (115 recipients of older grafts) and group 2 (158 recipients of younger grafts). The frequency of acute rejection (AR) episodes was similar in both groups but slow graft function occurred more frequently in group 1. The frequency of chronic renal allograft dysfunction in the first post-transplant year was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2. Patient and graft survival was significantly worse in group 1. Risk factors for graft loss were the difference between donor and recipient age and AR. Donor age and graft function were risk factors for patient death. Although kidneys from older donors provide a statistically poorer transplant outcome, they are clinically acceptable, especially when waiting time is prolonged and access to dialysis limited.     

A comparison of pedriatric and adult kidney donors for adult recipients

The high demand for organs for transplantation has made it necessary to consider using even the oldest and youngest of potential donors in order to increase the organ supply. In this retrospective study, the outcome of kidney transplantation using cadaveric pediatric donors was compared with that of an adult control series. Graft procurement took place in two regions of Italy (Emilia-Romagna and Piemonte) over an 11-year period. A group of pediatric donors ( < 15 years old, n = 30) was compared with an adult donor group (n = 67). All recipients were adults who received cyclosporin as immunosuppression. Actuarial patient and graft survival rates did not differ significantly between the two groups (patient survival 96 % and 96 % for pediatric donors versus 98 % and 92 % for adult donors at 1 and 5 years post-transplantation; graft survival 76 % and 68 % for pediatric donors versus 88 % and 74 % for adult donors 1 and 5 y post-transplantation). Complications were also evaluated, but no difference was found (the only exception being the creatinine level in the 5th year). Renal transplantation with cadaveric donors starting at 4 years of age gave results comparable to kidneys coming from adults. These data show that cadaveric pediatric donor kidneys may be used in adult recipients with good results. The ethical implications of the subject are extensively reviewed. Received: 5 November 1997 Received after revision: 15 October 1998 Accepted: 18 December 1998     

Renal transplantation in the elderly

Recent data show that, despite a long period during which fewelderly patients in end-stage renal failure received grafts, thereare neither medical nor ethical grounds for avoiding kidneytransplantation, at least in those aged under 70 or even 75 years ofage. Units in which transplantation in older recipients is routine showa good survival of recipients, and comparable survival of grafts tothose placed in younger recipients. This equality of graft survival withage arises because, although death with a functioning graft is morecommon in the elderly (principally from cardiovascular disease andinfections, with malignant diseases becoming more important with time),graft losses from rejection are lower, and so overall outcomes aresimilar. Long-term patient survival is better, quality of life isimproved and treatment is cheaper than in comparable elderly patientsmaintained on hemodialysis or chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Interms of allocation to older recipients, this success presents majorpractical and ethical difficulties given the shortage of cadaver organs.Data do not support the idea of `age-matching' older or marginalkidneys to older recipients: like their younger counterparts, olderrecipients do better with organs from younger donors. Living donors canbe used successfully even in those over 70, and elderly living donorshave a place in the treatment of the elderly. The optimumimmunosuppressive regimes for elderly recipients have not beendetermined, given their poorer immune responsiveness and lower rejectionrates compared with younger individuals. This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Effect of donor–recipient age difference on long-term graft survival in living kidney transplantation

Purpose

We aimed to examine the influence of donor age on living-donor kidney transplantation (KTx), particularly with regard to long-term graft survival in young recipients with aged kidney grafts.

Methods

Between 1988 and 2012, 287 living-donor KTxs were performed in our center. The recipients were divided into 3 groups according to age in years: under 30 (young), 30–49 (middle-aged), and over 50 (old). The data regarding the influence of kidneys from donors aged over 50 years were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Graft survival at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years was 94.7, 94.7, 90.2, and 75.2 %, respectively, in young recipients who received grafts from donors aged under 50 years, and 96.4, 91.9, 65.4, and 41.4 %, respectively, in young recipients who received grafts from donors aged over 50 years (P = 0.023). In contrast, there were no significant differences regarding graft survival and donor age in the middle-aged and old recipient groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that young recipient and rejection episode were significant predictors of graft loss in transplantation from older donors. Histological examination revealed significant age-related changes in the grafts before transplant and a significant higher rate of glomerular hypertrophy at the 1-month protocol biopsy in young recipients with aged kidney grafts.

Conclusions

Kidney grafts from older living donors affected long-term graft survival in young recipients. In addition to the damage from rejection, aged kidney grafts, which have less nephron mass, may have a limited capacity to appropriately respond to increases in physiological or metabolic demands of young recipients, leading to a greater reduction in renal function.     

Impact of live donor age (>or=50) on liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: The question of whether donor age negatively impacts recipient outcome in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is rarely discussed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of older donor age (50 years or older) on recipient outcomes in adult-to-adult LDLT. METHODS: LDLT data were retrospectively evaluated from our 299 LDLT cases in 297 recipients, which were divided into 2 groups: a younger group (group Y, donor age<50, n=237) and an older group (Group O, donor age>or=50, n=62). Clinical parameters of both recipients and donors were comparable between groups. RESULTS: There was no difference between the groups in patient survival or postoperative complications of either donors or recipients. In recipients, graft regeneration was significantly impaired in Group O. Graft function, including protein synthesis and cholestasis, was comparable between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Although the regeneration capacity of aged grafts was impaired, the function of grafts from older donors was comparable to that of those from younger donors. There was no difference in the clinical outcomes between the groups.     

Outcome of renal transplantation in children less than two years of age.

Twenty-two renal transplants were performed in 21 children less than two years of age at Children's Hospital. Fourteen were from living related donors and eight were from cadaveric donors. The five year patient and graft survivals of these recipients were compared to all other pediatric recipients between two and 18 years of age who received renal transplants over the same time period. Five year graft survival for recipients less than two years of age was 86% following living-related donor transplantation and 38% following cadaver donor transplantation. Older pediatric recipients aged between two and 18 years had a five year graft survival of 73% following living-related donor renal transplantation, which was similar to that for recipients less than two years of age. Although older cadaveric recipients had a comparable five year graft survival to younger recipients, at 42%, the patterns of graft loss were different. Graft failures in young recipients occurred within the first seven months post-transplant, whereas the older recipient's grafts failed more gradually. Actuarial five-year patient survival in recipients less than two years of age was 86% following living-related donor renal transplantation and 70% following cadaver-donor renal transplantation. Recipients less than two years of age had a poorer patient survival than older recipients following both living-related donor renal transplantation (P = 0.06) and cadaver-donor renal transplantation (P less than 0.05). These findings suggest that the graft survival of living-related donor renal transplantation in recipients less than two years of age is better than that of cadaver-donor renal transplantation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Outcome of renal transplantation from older living donors compared to younger living donor in developing country

Objectives: To evaluate whether the outcomes of renal grafts from living related donors older than 60 years are acceptable, in terms of renal function and patient/graft survival. Material and methods: One hundred and forty-seven patients who received kidneys from donor age ≥60 years constituted the study group (group 1). The control group (group 2) consisted of 1310 patients who received renal transplants from donor age <60 years. Outcome measures included graft, patient survival, acute rejection rate and serum creatinine (SCr) in patients/donors. Graft and patient survivals were compared using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: The mean age of donors was 62.7?±?3.39 years in group 1 and 43.45?±?9.65 years in group 2. Patient survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 95.7%, 89.4% and 82.6% in group 1 and 93.8%, 89.1% and 83.1% in group 2 (p?=?0.785), respectively. Death-censored graft survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 98.5%, 94.8% and 94.8% in group 1 and 96.1%, 92.9% and 89% in group 2 (p?=?0.166), respectively. Biopsy-proven acute rejections were 21% and 16.8% (p?=?0.206) and chronic rejections 5% and 3.4% in group 1 and 2, respectively (p?=?0.542). Recipient SCr (mg/dL) was 1.8?±?0.31 in group 1 and 1.58?±?0.37 in group 2. The donor SCr levels at the last follow-up were 1?mg/dL and 0.9?mg/dL in group 1 and 2, respectively. Conclusions: Donor age did not affect patient and graft survival in the 5-year follow-up in our study. Age alone seems not to be an exclusion criterion to living kidney donation.     

Use of elderly donors (> 60 years) for liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: As the demand for liver transplantation has become greater than the availability of donor livers, the criteria for donor selection or rejection are more important than ever before. In view of an increasing number of patients on the waiting list, some centres are expanding their donor pool by relaxing the criteria, such as by using organs from elderly (> 60 years) brainstem-dead donors. In this study, we reviewed our experience of using elderly brain-dead donor livers, investigating the potential prognostic factors of the donor, and analysing the influence of donor age on early graft function and graft survival. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 106 cadaveric donor liver transplantations in 98 patients. Seven patients (6.6%, 7 vs 106) received livers from donors older than 60 years. Pre-transplantation characteristics of donors and the outcome of recipients were evaluated. Donor prognostic factors were analysed using Cox univariate analysis and confirmed by a multivariate forward stepwise Cox model. Early graft function was compared between recipients of grafts from donors older and younger than 60 years. RESULTS: There were no primary non-functions or re-transplants in the group receiving elderly grafts. Early graft function was similar in patients with grafts from elderly and younger donors. Univariate analysis demonstrated that prognostic factors had no relationship with long-term recipient survival. The 3-month and 1-year cumulative graft survival rates were 100% and 82% in the elderly graft group and 84% and 83% in the younger graft group, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test indicated that there was no difference in graft and patient survival rates between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Old age is not a contraindication for liver donation. Liver grafts from donors older than 60 years can be used safely.     

Successful results after 5 years of tacrolimus therapy in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation in Japan

In Japan, living donor kidney transplantation accounts for about 80% of all kidney transplants. This is in contrast to the United States and Europe, where transplantation of organs from cadaveric or brain-dead donors is more common. This study analyzed the results of 5 years of experience with tacrolimus in Japan, focusing on the efficacy of the drug in improving patient and graft survival in patients who underwent transplantation with ABO-incompatible kidney grafts. Of the 1542 evaluable patients, 1281 patients received grafts from living donors. Of these, 177 patients received kidneys from ABO-incompatible donors and 981 patients received kidneys from ABO-compatible donors. Graft survival rates in ABO-incompatible recipients ranged from 90.7% at 1 year to 80.5% at 5 years. Subsequent graft survival rates in ABO-compatible recipients were 98.1% and 92.9%, respectively (P < .001 between groups). Patient survival rates at 5 years were 93.2% in ABO-incompatible recipients and 98.1% in ABO-compatible recipients. The rejection rate for kidneys from ABO-compatible donors was 27.8%, while for ABO-incompatible donors the rejection rate was 45.2%. The excellent outcome from this study demonstrates that even suboptimal ABO-incompatible donors can be used successfully as a source of kidneys when using tacrolimus as the immunosuppressive regimen. This may go some way to addressing the shortage of kidney donors in Japan.     

Liver Transplantation from Donors Aged 80 Years and Over: Pushing the Limit

Older donors are a growing part of the total donor pool but no definite consensus exists on the limit of age for their acceptance. From November 1998 to January 2003, in a retrospective case-control multicenter study, we compared the outcome of 30 orthotopic liver transplantations (OLTs) with octogenarian donors and of 60 chronologically correlated OLTs performed with donors <40 years. The percentage of refusal was greater among older than younger donors (48.2 vs. 14.3%; p < 0.001). Cold ischemia was significantly shorter in the older than younger groups. Recipients with hepatocarcinoma and older age received octogenarian grafts more frequently. No differences were seen in post-operative complications and 6-month graft and patient survival. However, long-term survival was lower in patients transplanted with octogenarian donors (p = 0.04). Interestingly, the mortality related to hepatitis C recurrence was greater in patients with octogenarian donors. Accordingly, the long-term survival of HCV-positive patients who received older grafts was lower than those receiving younger grafts (p = 0.05). Octogenarian livers can be used safely but a careful donor evaluation and a short cold ischemia are required to prevent additional risk factors. However, hepatitis C recurrence is associated with a greater mortality in patients who received octogenarian grafts raising concerns whether to allocate these livers to HCV-positive recipients.     

Renal transplantation in children with emphasis on young patients

We report the results of 41 consecutive renal transplantations performed on 39 children (median age 2.7 years). Twenty-six recipients were less than 5 years old. Twenty-one recipients (13 under the age of 5 years) received cadaver (CAD) grafts. All grafts except 2 were from adult donors and were placed extraperitoneally. Patients were on triple immunosuppression (cyclosporine plus azathioprine plus methylprednisolone). Mean followup time was 2.3 years. No vascular and only one ureteral complication was seen. Acute tubular necrosis occurred in 3 patients (7.3%). No grafts were lost due to acute rejection. Three-year patient survival and 1-year graft survival were 100%. The overall 3-year actuarial graft survival was 86%. Three-year survival of grafts from living-related donors (LRD) was 92% and that of CAD grafts 75%. In recipients younger than 5 years, 3-year LRD graft survival was 89% and CAD graft survival 73%. No significant differences in graft survival between recipients of different age groups or between LRD and CAD grafts were found. We conclude that results of renal transplantation in children under 5 years of age are comparable to those of older children, even using CAD grafts, when adult donors and triple immunosuppression are used.     

The Role of Various Risk Factors in Living Related Donor Renal Transplant Success

Assessment of living related donor (LRD) survival statistics offers the opportunity to gauge the effects of recipient characteristics without the perturbations of viability, function, and antigen sharing that are inherent in cadaveric organ grafting. From January 1, 1969 to January 1, 1979, 167 LRD grafts were performed. Crude patient survival at one year is 92% and 84% at five years. Graft function at one year is 79%, and at five years it is 64%. One year patient survival has steadily improved: 1969-73: 83%, 1973-75: 91%, 1975-79: 98%. Graft survival improved during the first two periods and has since remained unchanged. HLA identical grafts showed the expected advantage compared with single haplotype grafts (93 vs 74%). Recipient age was without effect until 50 years, all younger subgroups having one-year patient survival of 92-95%, while those older than 50 had a one-year survival of 60%. Juvenile diabetes was associated with a one-year patient survival of 85% and graft survival of 74%. Glomerulonephritis did not affect early graft survival statistics, but there was a greater frequency of graft loss after 2.5 years, with function at five years of 51 versus 68% for recipients with all other diagnoses. Cadaveric graft statistics vary with recipient race when adjusted to exclude older patients and diabetics, white recipient one-year graft survival 74%, black 38%. No meaningful difference exists among LRD recipients as to graft function, but there is a trend toward improved black patient survival. This suggests that there is not an inherent difference in immune response to genetically similar grafts, but that the disparate results with racially mixed donor-recipient combinations rests with other factors.     

Changing patterns in organ donation in Eurotransplant, 1990–1994

Abstract Organ transplantation has become the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage organ failure and has led to progressive increases in the size of waiting lists over the past decade. Unfortunately, from 1990 to 1994, the number of organ donors remained stable while the number of organs transplanted from these donors increased by only 10 %. In view of the severity of the current organ shortage, elderly individuals are increasingly being accepted as organ donors. The graft survival rate with kidneys from donors older than 55 years is 5 % lower than that with kidneys from younger donors at 1 year and 9 % lower at 3 years post-transplantation. Graft survival is also significantly lower with organs from donors who die from cerebrovascular accidents than it is with organs from donors whose cause of death is cerebral trauma. The number of patients waiting for a nonrenal donor organ has increased rapidly in the past 5 years, and an increasing number of donor kidneys are now being provided by multior-gan donors. The favorable graft survival rate with multiorgan donor kidneys, which is significantly better than that obtained with single organ donor kidneys, confirms their suitability for renal transplantation.