Comparison of Mometasone Furoate Dry Powder Inhaler and Fluticasone Propionate Dry Powder Inhaler in Patients with Moderate to Severe Persistent Asthma Requiring High-Dose Inhaled Corticosteroid Therapy: Findings from a Noninferiority Trial

Background. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are one of the suggested first-line therapies for patients with persistent asthma of moderate severity. Methods: The efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate (MF) 400 μg twice daily (BID) and fluticasone propionate (FP) 500 μ g BID administered for 12 weeks via dry powder inhaler (DPI) were compared in a noninferiority trial, in adults with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma. The primary variable was the change from baseline in am peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR). pm PEFR, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁), asthma symptoms, rescue medication use, response to therapy, exacerbation rates, and adverse events were also assessed. Results. The lower bound of 95% CIs for treatment differences in the primary variable ranged from 2.6% to 5.6% throughout the 12-week study and were within the prespecified noninferiority range. No significant between-group differences were observed in lung function, rescue medication use, response to therapy, exacerbation rates, or adverse events. At most of the weeks assessed, there were no between-group differences in asthma symptoms. Most adverse events were mild-to-moderate. Conclusion. MF-DPI 400 μ g BID was therapeutically equivalent to FP-DPI 500 μ g BID in patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma.     

A One-Week Dose-Ranging Study of Inhaled Salmeterol in Children with Asthma

This was a 1-week study evaluating the safety and efficacy of two dosage regimens of salmeterol in children with asthma. A total of 243 children, aged 4-11 years, with mild-to-moderate asthma were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study evaluating salmeterol xinafoate 21 μg and 42 μg administered via metered-dose inhaler (MDI) twice daily for 1 week. Patients were allowed to use albuterol MDI as needed for relief of acute symptoms. Inhaled corticosteroids and/or cromolyn at fixed dosages could be continued during the study, but theophylline and oral β-agonists were not allowed. Twelve-hour serial spirometry (for patients aged 6-11 years) and serial peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) (all patients) were performed on days 1 and 8 of treatment; morning and evening PEFR were recorded each day prior to inhalation of the study drug. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events, clinical laboratory values, vita signs, electrocardiogram (ECC), and 24-hr ECG (Holter) monitoring. Both the 21 -μg and 42-μg doses of salmeterol produced significantly greater bronchodilation, as measured by 12-hr serial forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV₁) (p ≤ 0.02) and PEFR (p ≤ 0.001), than did placebo on days 1 and 8. A small dose-response was observed, with the 42-μg dosage producing consistently higher serial FEV₁and PEFR than did the 21 -μg dosage, although the differences were not statistically significant. Morning and evening PEFR increased significantly (p ≤ 0.008) with both dosages of salmeterol compared with placebo. Twelve patients (5%) experienced potentially drug-related adverse events, with headache (4% in each salmeterol group) being the most common. There were no clinically significant changes in heart rate as measured by Holter monitoring, ECCs, vital signs, or clinical laboratory values following treatment with either dose of salmeterol. Salmeterol 21 μg or 42 μg twice daily was effective in producing bronchodilation in children aged 4-11 years, and both dosages had good safety profiles. Patients treated with salmeterol 42 μg twice daily showed a trend toward greater improvement in asthma control compared with those who received salmeterol 21 μg.     

Addition of Transdermal or Inhaled Long-Acting β 2-Agonists in Adult Asthmatic Patients Treated with Inhaled Corticosteroids: Switchover Study from Tulobuterol Patch to Salmeterol Dry Powder Inhaler

Sixty-four patients with persistent asthma receiving 200 to 800 μ g of fluticasone propionate daily were enrolled in this switchover study. The patients applied a tulobuterol patch 2 mg every 24 hours for 4 weeks followed by inhalation of salmeterol 100 μ g bid for 4 weeks. The mean values for morning and evening peak expiratory flow improved significantly compared with baseline during the 4 weeks of tulobuterol patch treatment. Further improvement was seen on switching to salmeterol treatment, which was significant even in the first week, and continued until the final week of the study. Use of salmeterol alone resulted in a significant increase in the percentage of forced expiratory volume in 1 second %FEV1 from baseline, with 51% of patients feeling that the treatment was effective (vs. 37% on tulobuterol). These data suggest that salmeterol can achieve better control in asthmatic patients after switching from using tulobuterol patches.     

Comparison of Salmeterol with Beclomethasone in Adult Patients with Mild Persistent Asthma Who Are Already on Low-Dose Inhaled Steroids

Current guidelines on asthma management recommend the early use of inhaled corticosteroids. Recent studies of patients with moderate to severe asthma show that the addition of salmeterol is superior to a further increase of the steroids. In this study with adult, mild persistent asthma patients, we compared the effects of adding salmeterol 50 μg b.i.d. versus beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 200 μg b.i.d. (both via Diskhaler dry powder inhaler) to the low-dose inhaled steroids. A double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study was conducted with a run-in period of 2 weeks and a treatment period of 12 weeks. Patients (n = 233) were randomized with a peak expiratory flow (PEF) reversibility of 22 10% (mean ± SD) in the run-in period. The morning PEF was 84 ± 17% predicted and the age was 42 ± 14 years (45% males). The average prestudy inhaled steroid dose was 361 μg daily. Within a week of salmeterol treatment the daily PEF recordings reached maximal levels. At the end of the treatment period the evening PEF remained significantly better in the salmeterol group than in the BDP group (p = 0.036). The PEFs, measured at the general practitioners (GPs) office, were at least 95% of the predicted values and the post-salbutamol values at the end of both treatments. However, the salmeterol group had already obtained this level after 2 weeks and differed significantly from the beclomethasone group (p = 0.003 for percent predicted and p = 0.0007 for post-salbutamol PEF values). The symptom scores and the use of rescue medication showed a similar profile. Quality of life improved with both treatments, but without significant statistical differences between the groups. The frequency of adverse events, typical for beta 2-agonists, was low and showed no differences between the groups. These results showed that the addition of salmeterol is at least as effective as adding beclomethasone in normalizing peak flows and improving asthma control in mild persistent asthma patients. Furthermore, salmeterol has a much faster onset of action.     

A dose-ranging study of tiotropium delivered via Respimat? Soft MistTM Inhaler or HandiHaler? in COPD patients

This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind within device, parallel-group, dose-ranging study. COPD patients (n = 202; 86% male; mean age: 61 years) were randomized to receive tiotropium 1.25 μg, 2.5 μg, 5 μg, 10 μg, or 20 μg Respimat^® SMI (a novel, propellant-free device); tiotropium 18 μg HandiHaler^®; placebo Respimat^®; or placebo HandiHaler^® for 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was trough FEV₁ on Day 21. Other assessments included FVC, PEFR, rescue medication use, safety, and pharmacokinetics. In general, all active treatments improved the primary and secondary endpoints on Day 21 (steady state) compared with placebo. Tiotropium 5 μg Respimat^®, 20 μg Respimat^®, and tiotropium 18 μg HandiHaler^® were statistically significantly higher than placebo for the primary endpoint (mean change in trough FEV₁ was 150 mL (both Respimat^® doses) versus 20 mL (placebo Respimat^®); p < 0.05; and 230 mL (HandiHaler^®) versus −90 mL (placebo HandiHaler^®); p ≤ 0.001). The urinary excretion (up to 2 hours post-dose) of tiotropium 5–10 μg Respimat^® was comparable with tiotropium 18 μg HandiHaler^®; the overall incidence of adverse events was comparable across treatment groups. Tiotropium 5 and 10 μg Respimat^® improve lung function in COPD patients and appear to be comparable with tiotropium 18 μg HandiHaler^®.     

Formoterol Delivered via the Dry Powder Aerolizer® Inhaler Versus Albuterol MDI and Placebo in Mild-to-Moderate Asthma: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Trial

The objectives of this study were to compare the efficacy and tolerability of twice-daily formoterol dry powder 12 µg and 24 µg (Foradil) delivered via Aerolizer inhaler with four times daily albuterol (salbutamol) 180 µg delivered via metered dose inhaler (MDI) and placebo. A total of 554 adolescents and adults (ages 12-75 years) with mild-to-moderate asthma were randomized to this 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Twelve-hour spirometry measurements were taken at weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12. A total of 484 patients completed the study (122, 116, 127, and 119 given formoterol 12 µg, formoterol 24 µg, albuterol, and placebo, respectively). For the primary efficacy variable, the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁), both formoterol 12 µg and 24 µg were statistically superior to placebo at all time points on all test days (p ≤ 0.017) and to albuterol at most time points on all test days (p ≤ 0.001). The onset of improvement in FEV₁ was rapid, with 15% increase within 5 min in 57%, 71%, and 65% of formoterol 12 µg, formoterol 24 µg, and albuterol patients, respectively. Formoterol was also superior to placebo and albuterol in terms of secondary efficacy variables: FEV₁ area under the curve, percentage of predicted FEV₁, forced vital capacity and forced expiratory flow, asthma symptom scores, and peak expiratory flows. In conclusion, both formoterol doses were superior to placebo in all lung function measurements. Overall, compared with albuterol, both formoterol doses produced superior bronchodilation. Formoterol and albuterol were safe and well-tolerated.     

Fenoterol Delivery by Respimat® Soft Mist Inhaler Versus CFC Metered Dose Inhaler: Cumulative Dose-Response Study in Asthma Patients

Objectives. Respimat® (RMT) soft mist inhaler (SMI) is a novel, propellant-free alternative to chlorofluorocarbon metered-dose inhalers (CFC-MDIs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and establish the equipotent dose of fenoterol delivered by RMT SMI vs. a conventional MDI. Design. Double-blind, randomized, crossover, comparative study between fenoterol inhaled via RMT (either 50 µg/actuation, RMT50; or 100 µg/actuation, RMT100) and MDI (100 µg/actuation; MDI100). Patients and interventions. A total of 41 asthma patients received cumulative doses of fenoterol 600 µg (RMT50) or 1200 µg (RMT100 and MDI100) on 3 test days. Measurements and results. The bronchodilator response (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV₁]) was considered therapeutically equivalent (i.e., noninferior) if the 95% confidence intervals for the difference in their mean changes from baseline were within limits of ± 0.15 L. Systemic exposure was evaluated from plasma fenoterol levels. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. RMT50 and RMT100 produced noninferior bronchodilatation to MDI100 from 30 minutes after the first dose. RMT50 showed equivalent safety and tolerability to MDI100, whereas RMT100 produced a higher incidence of AEs, a significantly greater plasma potassium reduction and a significant increase in pulse rate. Fenoterol plasma levels were twice as high with RMT100 as with RMT50 or MDI100. Conclusions. The nominal dose of fenoterol administered via RMT SMI can be at least halved to achieve equivalent efficacy, safety, and tolerability to a MDI.     

Comparison of DiskusTM Inhaler, a New Multidose Powder Inhaler, with DiskhalerTM Inhaler for the Delivery of Salmeterol to Asthmatic Patients

Administration of the long-acting β₂-adrenoceptor agonist salmeterol from a new, easy-to-operate, multidose powder inhaler (Diskus^TM) containing 60 sealed doses in a foil strip has been compared with administration from a Diskhaler^TM inhaler in a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study. Asthmatic patients taking anti-inflammatory treatment, with baseline FEV₁≥, 60% and ≥ 90% predicted were treated for 4 weeks with salmeterol 50μg twice daily from either the Diskus or Diskhaler inhaler. The two treatments were equivalent (90% CLs for the difference in mean morning PEFR: -2.2, 8.7 L/min). The Diskus inhaler was rated easier to use and was preferred by more patients than the Diskhaler inhaler (73% vs. 15%).

Diskhaler, Rotadisk, Diskus, and Accuhaler are trademarks of the Glaxo Wellcome Group of companies.     

High-Dose Inhaled Budesonide May Substitute for Oral Therapy After an Acute Asthma Attack

Patients attending the emergency room with acute asthma, participating in a study comparing salbutamol (albuterol in the United States) via a dry powder inhaler (Turbuhaler®) with pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI), were included in this 1-week follow-up study with the aim of assessing whether inhaled budesonide via Turbuhaler may be an alternative to prednisolone tablets after an acute asthma attack. Eighty-one patients with a mean age of 38 years and forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV₁) of 64% predicted normal value after treatment with salbutamol were randomized in this double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study. The doses given were budesonide 1600 μg b.i.d. or prednisolone in daily doses from 40 mg (day 1) decreased to 5 mg (day 7). FEV₁ was recorded before and after the 7-day treatments and peak expiratory flow (PEF) morning and evening, clinical symptoms (visual analogue scale 0-100), and doses of rescue medication (terbutalineTurbuhaler 0.25 mg/dose) were recorded daily. The mean increase in FEV, from baseline to day 7 was 1 7.3% in the budesonide Turbuhaler group and 1 7.6% in the prednisolone group. Mean values of morning PEF increased from day 1 to day 7 by 67 L/min in the budesonide Turbuhaler group and by 57 L/min in the prednisolone group (not significant). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in clinical symptoms and in the number of doses of rescue medication. Because of disease deterioration, five patients in the Turbuhaler group and three in the prednisolone group needed additional symptomatic as well as corticosteroid treatment. Inhaled budesonide in high doses may be a substitute for oral therapy as follow-up treatment after an acute asthma attack.     

Bronchodilator Responses to Salbutamol Using Diskhaler Versus Metered-Dose Inhaler

In adults inhaling salbutamol via metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) 200 μ.g doses are recommended, but with diskhalers the manufacturer advocates 400 rather than 200 µg doses. To assess this advice, a partially double-blind, placebo-controlled salbutamol dose response, crossover study (also incorporating MDI doses) was conducted in 12 mild/moderate asthmatics. After active treatment, mean peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) increments yielded no clinically or statistically significant differences; compared to placebo, respective median differences in PEFR increments (95% CIs) were 10 (-10, 50), 20 (0, 50), and 15 (0, 30) following 400 and 200 µg via diskhalers and 200 u.g via MDIs. Diskhalers are a suitable alternative for patients with poor MDI technique, but the use of 400 rather than 200 µg salbutamol doses is not supported by evidence.     

The C523A β2 Adrenergic Receptor Polymorphism Associates with Markers of Asthma Severity in African Americans

Our goal was to explore associations between β₂ adrenergic receptor polymorphisms and markers of asthma severity in African American and Caucasian patients with asthma. Polymorphisms at loci -1023, -654, -47, 46, 79, 491, and 523 were genotyped and haplotypes were imputed in 143 African Americans and 336 Caucasians. C523A genotype associated with percentage of African Americans (but not of Caucasians) having an asthma exacerbation: AA, AC, and CC genotypes were 17, 29, and 40%, respectively (p = 0.018). Symptom scores, pulmonary function, and rescue inhaler use paralleled exacerbation prevalence. We conclude the 523 A allele modifies asthma severity in African Americans.     

Furosemide Given by Inhalation Ameliorates Acute Exacerbation of Asthma

Previous studies have suggested that inhaled furosemide may have a protective effect against a wide variety of bronchoconstrictor agents, but a therapeutic effect has not been established in acute exacerbation of asthma. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether inhaled furosemide would exhibit any therapeutic benefit in acute asthma. We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study in 40 patients with acute mild or moderate exacerbation of asthma. All patients received intravenous (IV) aminophylline 250 mg for 90 min and IV hydrocortisone 100 mg at entry. After randomization, 3 patients were excluded from the final analysis. At 30 min after starting IV aminophylline, 20 patients were given inhaled furosemide 20 mg and 17 patients received normal saline as placebo-control. Both inhalations were given by a jet nebulizer. The baseline forced expiratory volume at 1 sec (FEV₁), peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), and serum concentration of theophylline did not differ between the two groups. An increase in FEV₁ in the furosemide group by 28.2 ± 5.9% (mean ± SE) was noted at 60 min, and this was significantly higher than in the control group. PEFR at 60 min was also significantly higher in the furosemide group than in control group. We conclude that inhaled furosemide has a bronchodilator effect on mild to moderate exacerbation of asthma when it is used with IV theophylline. Inhaled furosemide may benefit certain acute asthma patients, especially those suffering complications from the adverse effects of β₂-agonists.     

Comparison Between Fenoterol and Fenoterol Plus Oxitropium Bromide Delivered by Metered-Dose Inhaler with InspirEase to Relieve Acute Asthma Attack

Although the inhalation of β₂-agonists has frequently been used to relieve acute asthma attacks, the efficacy of anticholinergic agents for acute asthma attacks still remains unclear. This study was designed to compare the inhalation of fenoterol and the inhalation of fenoterol plus oxitropium bromide delivered by a metered-dose inhaler with holding chamber (InspirEase) to relieve acute asthma attacks. To accomplish this, 69 patients who had presented with an acute asthma attack were randomized to receive either fenoterol (1 puff [200 μg/puff] every 1 min for 5 min; total 1000 μg) or fenoterol plus oxitropium bromide (2 puffs [100 μg/puff] every 1 min for 5 min; total 1000 μg). The peak expiratory flow (PEF) and forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV) values were measured before treatment, and 1,15, 30, and 60 min after the inhalation therapy. The ratios of improvement, PEF (or FEV) after treatment divided by PEF (or FEV) before treatment, were also calculated. Thirty-three patients were evaluated in the combination group and 31 patients were evaluated in the fenoterol group. The PEF value at 60 min after inhalation therapy of the fenoterol plus oxitropium bromide group (261 ± 18 L/min, mean ± standard error) was significantly higher compared to that of the fenoterol group (210 ± 17 L/min). In addition, the ratios of improvement of PEF at 1, 15, 30, and 60 min after inhalation therapy were significantly higher in the fenoterol plus oxitropium bromide group compared with the fenoterol group.     

Long-Term Safety of a Non-Chlorofluorocarbon- Containing Triamcinolone Acetonide Inhalation Aerosol in Patients with Asthma

In response to environmental concerns regarding chlorofluorocarbon (CFC), two new triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) inhalation aerosol (Azmacort Inhalation Aerosol) formulations have been developed using a more environmentally favorable propellant, HFA-134a (1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane). This multicenter, open-label study evaluated the safety of switching asthma patients from TAA-CFC to one of two TAA-HFA formulations. After a 2- or 4-week baseline period during which patients received only CFC-containing TAA Inhaler, 552 patients were randomized to receive TAA-HFA 75 or 225 μg for 6 or 12 months. A total of 493 patients completed treatment. Seven patients discontinued because of adverse events and two because of ineffective asthma control. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two treatment groups, and most events were mild to moderate in severity and were not considered related to study medication. No clinically relevant suppression of the hypophyseal-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis was observed. Pulmonary function tests were not adversely affected by use of either study medication, and improvements were noted in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV₁) and forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of forced vital capacity (FEF_25%-75%) throughout the course of treatment. This study confirms that TAA-HFA provides effective, long-term asthma control and can safely be substituted for the currently marketed CFC-containing TAA product.     

Efficacy and safety of omalizumab in an Asian population with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma

Background and objective:   The efficacy and safety of the anti-IgE antibody, omalizumab, has been widely studied in patients with asthma. However to date, no large studies have been performed in Asian populations. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of omalizumab with placebo, as add-on therapy in Asian patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma.
Methods:   Japanese patients (20–75 years of age) with uncontrolled asthma, despite receiving high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and other standard therapies, were randomized to receive add-on treatment with omalizumab or placebo in a 16-week, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre study.
Results:   Altogether, 315 treated patients were included in the efficacy and safety analyses. The change from baseline in morning PEF was 15.45 L/min (least squares mean) with omalizumab versus 2.25 L/min with placebo, a statistically significant difference of 13.19 L/min ( P  = 0.0004). Clinically significant asthma exacerbations occurred in six patients (4.0%) treated with omalizumab and in 18 patients (11.0%) treated with placebo. The odds ratio for the risk of experiencing an asthma exacerbation was 0.32 in favour of omalizumab ( P  = 0.0192). Changes in asthma symptom scores, daily life activity scores, sleep scores and rescue medication use were in favour of omalizumab, but group differences did not reach statistical significance. Adverse event rates were similar between omalizumab and placebo, except for injection site reactions, which were more frequently observed in the omalizumab group.
Conclusions:   Add-on treatment with omalizumab improved asthma control without significant adverse events in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma.     

Beclomethasone/formoterol versus budesonide/formoterol combination therapy in asthma.

The present study was designed to compare the fixed combination of beclomethasone and formoterol in a hydrofluoroalkane Modulite (Chiesi Farmaceutici, Parma, Italy) pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI), with a combination of budesonide and formoterol administered via a Turbuhaler (AstraZeneca, Lund, Sweden) dry powder inhaler (DPI). This was a phase III, multinational, multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, two-arm parallel groups, controlled study design. After a 2-week run-in period, 219 patients with moderate-to-severe asthma were randomised to a 12-week treatment with beclomethasone 200 microg plus formoterol 12 microg b.i.d. delivered via a pMDI or budesonide 400 microg plus formoterol 12 microg b.i.d. delivered via a DPI. The analysis of noninferiority on primary outcome, morning peak expiratory flow in the last 2 weeks of treatment, showed no difference between groups. A statistically significant improvement from baseline in lung function, symptoms and rescue medication use was observed in both groups at all time-points. No differences were observed between treatments in either rate of asthma exacerbations or frequency of adverse events. The new fixed combination of beclomethasone and formoterol in hydrofluoroalkane Modulite pressurised metered-dose inhaler is equivalent to the marketed combination of budesonide and formoterol in terms of efficacy and tolerability profile.     

Short-Term Regular β2-Adrenergic Agonists Treatment Is Safe in Mild Asthmatics Taking Low Doses of Inhaled Steroids

Regular treatment with β₂ adrenergic agonists is controversial in bronchial asthma. To investigate whether β₂-adrenergic agonists can be used safely if associated with low doses of inhaled steroids, for a short period, without a deterioration of asthma control, we have examined 24 mild asthmatics. In a parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 1 week of run-in and run-out period framed 3 weeks of treatment. All patients received inhaled beclometha-sone dipropionate (BDP 250 μg t.i.d.); after 1 week, 12 patients inhaled 400 μg of broxaterol and 12 patients received placebo t.i.d. FVC, FEV₁, PD₂₀-FEV₁ methacholine, morning and evening PEF, and PEF amplitude % mean were measured before, during, and after treatment. No significant changes were noted in patients receiving inhaled broxaterol. There were no differences in symptoms and the use of rescue medication (salbutamol spray). We conclude that short-term regular treatment with (β₂-adrenergic agonists is not associated with a deterioration in asthma control in mild asthmatics inhaling low doses of steroids.     

Similar efficacy of ciclesonide once daily versus fluticasone propionate twice daily in patients with persistent asthma.

This 12-week, double-blind, parallel-group study compared the efficacy and safety of once daily ciclesonide and twice daily fluticasone propionate in patients aged 12-75 years with persistent asthma. Patients were randomized to once-daily ciclesonide 80 micro g (n = 278) or 160 micro g (n = 271), or twice daily fluticasone propionate 88 micro g (n = 259) (all ex-actuator). Significant improvements from baseline were seen in all three treatment groups for forced expiratory volume in 1 second, asthma symptom scores and rescue medication use (all p < 0.0001). Asthma exacerbation rates were low (each ciclesonide group, n = 2; fluticasone group, n = 1). Adverse event reporting indicated good tolerability. Once daily ciclesonide 80 micro g or 160 micro g showed comparable efficacy and tolerability to twice daily fluticasone propionate 88 micro g in persistent asthma.     

Nebulized Fluticasone Propionate vs. Budesonide as Adjunctive Treatment in Children with Asthma Exacerbation

Objectives: To compare the effects of nebulized fluticasone propionate (FP) and nebulized budesonide (BUD) in addition to inhaled salbutamol in children with mild asthma exacerbation. Methods: The study was a multicenter, randomized, single-blind, parallel group design. One hundred and sixty-eight children, aged 4-15 years, were randomly allocated to receive either nebulized FP (250 mcg) or nebulized BUD (500 mcg) twice daily for 10 days. On presentation, at the end of treatment, and after a 7-day follow-up, clinical assessment and pulmonary function measurements were performed. Daytime and nighttime asthma symptom scores, the use of rescue salbutamol, and morning/evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) values were recorded at home during the treatment period. Morning cortisol concentration (51 children) and overnight urinary cortisol excretion (30 children) were also measured in six centers at the start and at the end of the treatment. Results: Improvement of morning PEF was significantly higher in patients treated with FP (p = 0.032). The percentage of symptom-free nights was significantly higher in the BUD group (p = 0.006), but no difference was found in symptom-free days. No intergroup difference was detected in the percentage of days/nights free from rescue medication and in pulmonary function tests performed in outpatient settings. There was no evidence of hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression. Conclusions: A short course of nebulized FP has the same effects as a double dose of nebulized BUD, when either drug is added to bronchodilator therapy in children with mild asthma exacerbation.     

What Predicts Change in Pulmonary Function and Quality of Life in Asthma or COPD?

Information about predictors of decline in pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV₁]) or health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with asthma or (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]) might help to determine those who need additional care. A 2-year prospective cohort study was conducted among 380 asthma and 120 COPD patients. In both asthma and COPD patients, a 2-year change in FEV₁ was only weakly associated with a 2-year change in HRQoL (r = .0.19 and 0.24, respectively). In both groups, older age, living in an urban environment, and a lower peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) at baseline were associated with a decline in FEV₁. Additional predictors of FEV₁ decline were greater body weight, less chronic cough or sputum production, and less respiratory symptoms in asthma patients and current smoking in COPD patients. A decline in HRQoL was associated with older age, non-compliance with medication, more dyspnea, and a lower PEFR in asthma patients and with male gender, lower education, lower body weight, more dyspnea, and more respiratory symptoms in COPD patients. Our results show that FEV₁ and HRQoL appear to represent different disease aspects influenced by different predictors.