Evaluation of the VITEK 2 cards for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of non‐glucose‐fermenting Gram‐negative bacilli

We evaluated VITEK 2 cards (NGNC and AST‐GN10) for the accuracy of identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of non‐glucose‐fermenting Gram‐negative bacilli (NGF‐GNB). In a total of 201 strains, 190 strains (94.5%) were correctly identified, seven strains (3.5%) showed low discrimination, four strains (2.0%) had discrepancies, and no strain remained unidentified. Reference AST of amikacin, aztreonam, cefepime, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, levofloxacin, piperacillin‐tazobactam, and trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole was performed by the agar dilution method. Approximately 82.5% of ID and 72.9% of AST were completed within 7 and 14 h, respectively. For NGF‐GNB, other than Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter spp., Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and the Burkholderia cepacia group, essential agreements (EAs) were 93.6–100.0%. Severe disagreements (resistant by the reference method to susceptible by AST‐GN10) were observed for amikacin (0.9%), cefepime (1.8%), cefotaxime (1.8%), imipenem (0.9%), and piperacillin‐tazobactam (0.9%). One major disagreement (susceptible to resistant) was observed for ceftazidime (0.1%). For P. aeruginosa, EAs were 85.7–100%, with severe disagreements observed for cefepime (4.8%) and piperacillin‐tazobactam (4.8%). For Acinetobacter spp., EAs were 86.4–100% without disagreements. The VITEK 2 cards appear to be promising for rapid ID and reliable AST for most species of NGF‐GNB.     

Comparative in vitro activity of cefepime (BMY 28142) against multiresistant nosocomial isolates ofPseudomonas aeruginosa

The in vitro activity of a new parenteral cephalosporin cefepime (BMY 28142) was compared with that of ceftazidime, cefotaxime, piperacillin, imipenem, gentamicin, amikacin and ciprofloxacin against 173 recent multiresistantPseudomonas aeruginosa isolates of nosocomial origin using an agar dilution technique with an inoculum of 10⁴ CFU per spot. The activity of cefepime was comparable to that of ceftazidime, superior to that of cefotaxime, piperacillin, gentamicin and amikacin, but inferior to that of imipenem and ciprofloxacin. Cross-resistance ofPseudomonas aeruginosa to ceftazidime and cefepime occurred in nearly 50% of the cefepime resistant strains and 61.5% of the ceftazidime resistant strains respectively.     

Comparison of in vitro activities of levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam against aerobic bacterial pathogens from patients with nosocomial infections.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is a rapid worldwide emergence of multidrug-resistant pathogens, especially in nosocomial isolates. This study compared the in vitro activities of levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam against 208 aerobic bacterial pathogens that caused 197 nosocomial infections in 184 patients. METHODS: Antimicrobial susceptibility was evaluated by E test in accordance with the guidelines of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. RESULTS: Most (140/208, 67%) of the isolates were facultative Gram-negative bacilli. Levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were the most effective (22/22, 100%) against oxacillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. None of the antibiotics tested were found to be effective (0/25) against oxacillin-resistant S. aureus. Of the 11 isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii that were not pandrug-resistant (PDR), only 9 isolates (9/11, 81%) were sensitive to imipenem and 5 isolates (5/11, 45%) were sensitive to levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and ceftazidime. Another 22 isolates of A. baumannii that were PDR were completely resistant to all 6 antibiotics. The majority of isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were sensitive to these 6 antimicrobial agents with 10/11 (91%) sensitive to levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin, 9/11 (83%) sensitive to ceftazidime, cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam, and 8/11 (75%) sensitive to imipenem. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the bacterial isolates causing nosocomial infections were found to be sensitive to the 6 antibiotics tested. Bacterial isolates of nosocomial infections that were completely resistant to these 6 antibiotics were PDR A. baumannii, PDR P. aeruginosa, and oxacillin-resistant S. aureus. More potent antimicrobial agents are needed to treat infections caused by PDR A. baumannii and PDR P. aeruginosa.     

Evaluation of VITEK 2 rapid identification and susceptibility testing system against gram-negative clinical isolates

A total of 281 strains of miscellaneous members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and other gram-negative bacteria were evaluated by use of identification tests with the VITEK 2 system (bioMérieux) and an API identification system (bioMérieux). A total of 237 (95%) strains were correctly identified to the species level. Only six (2.1%) strains were misidentified, and eight (2.8%) strains were not identified. Among 14 strains with discrepant identifications, 8 (57.1%) strains were nonfermenters. The susceptibilities of 228 strains to 11 antibiotics including amikacin, netilmicin, tobramycin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, meropenem, ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin, and piperacillin in combination with tazobactam were tested with the VITEK 2 AST-No. 12 card and by the broth microdilution (MB) method, according to NCCLS guidelines, as a reference. For the 2,508 organism-antibiotic combinations, the rates at which duplicate MICs correlated within +/-1 dilution ranged from 84.2 to 95.6%. Only 13 (0.5%) and 10 (0.4%) of the susceptibility tests gave major errors (resistant with the VITEK 2 system but sensitive by the MB method) and very major errors (sensitive with the VITEK 2 system but resistant by the MB method), respectively. Both VITEK 2 ID-GNB (an identification system) and VITEK 2 AST-No. 12 (a susceptibility testing system) card systems gave rapid, reliable, and highly reproducible results.     

High frequency of antibiotic resistance among Gram-negative isolates in intensive care units at 10 Swedish hospitals

Objective: To investigate the resistance rates among Gram-negative isolates in Swedish intensive care units (ICUs).
Method: During 1994–95, members of the Swedish Study Group collected, on clinical indication, 502 consecutive initial isolates of Gram-negative bacteria from patients admitted to ICUs at 10 Swedish hospitals and performed minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) determinations with the Etest. Breakpoints were defined according to the criteria of the Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics (SRGA).
Results: The distribution of bacterial species was: Escherichia coli > Klebsiella spp. > Enterobacter spp. > Pseudomonas aeruginosa > Haemophilus spp. > Proteus spp. > Stenotrophomonas maltophilia > Citrobacter spp. > Acinetobacter > Pseudomonas. spp. > Morganella morganii > Serratia spp. Together these constituted 97% of all isolates. The frequencies of resistance for all the initial Gram-negative isolates were: ceftazidime 6.8%, cefotaxime 14.9%, ceftriaxone 18.5%, cefuroxime 44.1%, ciprofloxacin 4.2%, co-trimoxazole 17.8%, gentamicin 5.8%, imipenem 8.6%, piperacillin 20.2%, piperacillin/tazobactam 12.9% and tobramycin 5.8%.
Conclusions: Among Gram-negative isolates in Swedish ICUs, a very high frequency of resistance was seen to cefuroxime, and rather high frequencies of resistance to cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, piperacillin and piperacillin/tazobactam. These drugs cannot be recommended for further use as empirical monotherapy for severe ICU-acquired Gram-negative infections in ICUs in Sweden.     

Accuracy of three automated systems (MicroScan WalkAway, VITEK, and VITEK 2) for susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa against five broad-spectrum beta-lactam agents

One hundred recent clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were used to assess the quantitative (MIC) and qualitative (susceptibility category) accuracies of the MicroScan WalkAway, VITEK, and VITEK 2 automated susceptibility test systems when five-broad spectrum beta-lactams, aztreonam, cefepime, ceftazidime, imipenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam, were tested. Isolates were selected so that the MICs for the isolates overrepresented the MICs near the breakpoints to assess precisely the agreement between the results obtained with the automated systems and the results obtained by the reference tests. The categorical and MIC results from the automated systems were compared to the consensus result of three reference methods: broth microdilution, agar dilution, and disk diffusion. The consensus categorical testing (susceptibility and resistance) rates were 47 and 27%, respectively, for aztreonam; 59 and 14%, respectively, for cefepime; 44 and 43%, respectively, for ceftazidime; 71 and 19%, respectively, for imipenem; and 50 and 50%, respectively, for piperacillin-tazobactam. All systems tested exhibited a high, unacceptable level of very major (false-susceptible) errors for piperacillin-tazobactam (19 to 27%). Major (false-resistant) error rates were generally acceptable (0 to 3%), but minor error rates were elevated (8 to 32%) for cefepime (VITEK 2 and VITEK) and for aztreonam (all three systems), leading to consistent trends toward false resistance. Manufacturer reevaluation of these automated systems for the testing of selected beta-lactams with current clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa that exhibit contemporary resistance mechanisms would be prudent to minimize the potential for serious reporting errors.     

Development of resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa obtained from patients with cystic fibrosis at different times

Objective  Determination of the extent of changes in quantitative resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from patients with cystic fibrosis over a period of approximately 2 years.
Methods  Three hundred and ninety nine isolates of P. aeruginosa collected from 34 pediatric patients in the period between April 1994 and April 1996 were investigated. During the 2 years the children were treated with a combination of a betalactam and an aminoglycoside, approximately every 3 months. In between they received ciprofloxacin orally, when required. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 38 clones of P. aeruginosa defined by different patterns in macrorestriction analysis (pulse field gel electrophoresis, PFGE) were established for 12 antibiotics: gentamicin, amikacin, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, trovafloxacin, imipenem, meropenem, ceftazidime, cefepime, and piperacillin by means of broth microdilution tests according to DIN 58940.
Results  Twenty-four of the 38 clones developed increased MIC values during the time of observation especially for aminoglycosides and quinolones. Comparatively less affected were ceftazidime, imipenem and meropenem. An association between the number of the intravenous treatment courses and the increase of the MIC values could not be verified.
Conclusions  A trend towards an increase of the MICs against antipseudomonal agents was observed over a limited period of time. It is necessary to prevent this development possibly by employing suitable combinations of antibiotics and the introduction of new substances.     

Comparative antibacterial activity of a new monobactam, carumonam (RO 17-2301, AMA 1080) on hospital bacteria resistant to beta lactams

In vitro activity of a new monobactam, carumonam (RO 17-2301, AMA 1080) was tested against 370 hospital bacterial isolates. Results were compared to aztreonam, cefotaxime, cefmenoxime, latamoxef, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, pefloxacin against Enterobacteriaceae, to aztreonam, piperacillin, cefoperazone, cefsulodin, ceftazidime, imipenem and pefloxacin against P. aeruginosa. All Enterobacteriaceae strains produced cephalosporinases and all P. aeruginosa strains were ticarcillin resistant. MIC 90% of carumonam against Enterobacteriaceae strains was lower than 0.25 mg/l for P. mirabilis, P. vulgaris, P. stuartii, Salmonella sp., ranged from 0.25 to 0.5 mg/l for Klebsiella sp. and S. marcescens, from 1 to 2 mg/l for E. coli and P. morganii, and from 4 to 8 mg/l for C. freundii and E. cloacae. The rate of strains inhibited with 4 mg/l of carumonam was 95.3%. So carumonam was at the second place from eight tested products, after latamoxef (97.5% of susceptible strains). Carumonam was active against second generation cephalosporins resistant strains when these strains were susceptible or intermediate to cefotaxime. Strains resistant to this compound escaped to its action. Its activity against A. calcoaceticus was weak (22.6% of strains inhibited by 4 mg/l), but was superior to that of cefsulodin against ticarcillin resistant P. aeruginosa strains (54.5 versus 16.1% of susceptible strains). However carumonam was less active against this last species than ceftazidime or imipenem (92.6 and 91% of susceptible strains respectively).     

Effect of β-lactam antibiotics on the in vitro development of resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Objective   To investigate whether stepwise selection of resistance mutations may mirror the continued bacterial exposure to antibiotics that occurs in the clinical setting.
Methods   We examined the in vitro development of resistance to a number of commonly used antibiotics (cefepime, cefpirome, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, piperacillin and imipenem) in Pseudomonas aeruginosa , a significant nosocomial pathogen. Stepwise resistance was assessed by serial passage of colonies located nearest to the inhibition zone on antibiotic-containing gradient plates.
Results   The lowest frequencies of spontaneous resistance mutations were found with cefepime and imipenem; these drugs also resulted in the slowest appearance of resistance of spontaneous resistance mutations. In five wild-type P. aeruginosa strains, cefepime-selected isolates required a mean of 30 passages to reach resistance; resistance occurred more rapidly in strains selected with other cephalosporins. P. aeruginosa strains that produced β -lactamase or non-enzymatic resistance generally developed resistance more rapidly than wild-type strains. For most strains, resistance to all antibiotics except imipenem correlated with increased levels of β -lactamase activity. Cross-resistance of cephalosporin-selected resistant mutants to other cephalosporins was common. Cephalosporin-resistant strains retained susceptibility to imipenem and ciprofloxacin.
Conclusions   From our in vitro study, we can conclude that the rate of development of resistance of P. aeruginosa is lower with cefepime compared with other cephalosporines.     

某综合医院铜绿假单胞菌2005-2009年耐药性的变迁

目的了解某综合医院2005-2009年铜绿假单胞菌临床分离株的耐药性变迁,为合理应用抗菌药物提供依据。方法应用回顾性调查方法,对广东省汕头市某综合医院2005-2009年住院病人送检标本中分离的铜绿假单胞菌的药敏试验结果进行统计分析。结果 5年间共检出铜绿假单胞菌1809株,总的分离率为16.34%;标本分布以痰液来源为主,占84.9%;几年间铜绿假单胞菌对氨苄西林、复方新诺明、呋喃妥因、头孢唑啉的耐药率变化不大,对阿米卡星、庆大霉素、妥布霉素、亚胺培南、头孢他啶、头孢吡肟、环丙沙星、左旋氧氟沙星等抗菌药物的耐药率均在2007年达到高峰,在2008、2009年两年间呈连续下降趋势。从2009年的情况来看,耐药率最低的是妥布霉素,为28.97%（168/580）,其次为阿米卡星和左旋氧氟沙星,分别为32.07%（186/580）和33.97%（197/580）。结论铜绿假单胞菌对大多数抗菌药物的耐药率有所下降,但总体耐药情况还是比较严重。     

Evaluation of the VITEK 2 system for rapid direct identification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli from positive blood cultures

This study explores the possibility of combining the BacT/Alert Microbial Detection System with the VITEK 2 system to achieve rapid bacterial identification and susceptibility testing. Direct inoculation of bacterial suspension to the VITEK 2 ID-GNB card and AST-NO09 card was made by differential centrifugation of blood cultures of organisms with gram-negative enteric bacillus-like morphology. A total of 118 strains were investigated; of these, 97 (82.2%) strains were correctly identified to the species level and 21 (17.8%) strains were not identified; by comparing the results with those of the reference method of API identification systems using a pure culture, it was found that no strain had been misidentified. Among the 21 strains with no identification, 13 (61.9%) strains were nonfermenters. The direct-identification reporting time of VITEK 2 was 3.3 h. Direct testing of susceptibility to 11 antibiotics, i.e., amikacin, cefepime, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, imipenem, meropenem, netilmicin, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and tobramycin, was also performed by using the broth microdilution (MB) method according to the NCCLS guidelines as a reference. After comparing the MICs of the VITEK 2 system with those obtained by the MB method within +/-twofold dilution, it was determined that the 1,067 organism-antibiotic combinations had an overall correct rate of 97.6% (1,041 combinations). The rates of susceptibility to the 11 antibiotics ranged from 88.7 to 100%, respectively. Only two (0.2%) and four (0.4%) combinations of the susceptibility tests gave very major errors (i.e., reported as sensitive by the VITEK 2 system but shown to be resistant by the MB method) and major errors (i.e., reported as resistant by the VITEK 2 system but shown to be sensitive by the MB method), respectively. The reporting time for the direct testing of susceptibility against the 11 antibiotics for 97 blood culture isolates by the VITEK 2 system ranged from 3.3 to 17.5 h. Compared with conventional methods that require 1 or 2 days, this method can make same-day reporting possible and thus permit better patient management.     

Detection of carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii in a hospital

Acinetobacter baumannii strains resistant to both imipenem (IPM) and ceftazidime (CAZ) were isolated from 1994 through 1996 at Gunma University Hospital. Nine isolates from different inpatients were examined for carbapenem-hydrolyzing activity and for the carbapemase gene bla(IMP) by the PCR method. All nine isolates were carbapenemase-producing strains that hydrolyzed IPM and that harbored bla(IMP). The bla(IMP) gene was transmissible by conjugation to an IPM-susceptible recipient strain of A. baumannii and conferred resistance to IPM, CAZ, cefotaxime (CTX), ampicillin (AMP), and piperacillin (PIP). Either intermediate or high-level resistance to amikacin (AMK) was transferred from two and five strains, respectively, concomitantly with bla(IMP), and gentamicin (GEN) resistance was also transferred in one instance of high-level AMK resistance. Comparative examination of clinical isolates for resistance patterns to nine drugs, IPM, CAZ, CTX, aztreonam, AMP, PIP, AMK, GEN, and norfloxacin, in addition to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns with NotI-digested genomic DNA, confirmed nosocomial transmission of infections involving carbapenemase-producing A. baumannii strains.     

Molecular surveillance of European quinolone-resistant clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. using automated ribotyping

Nosocomial isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. exhibit high rates of resistance to antibiotics and are often multidrug resistant. In a previous study (D. Milatovic, A. Fluit, S. Brisse, J. Verhoef, and F. J. Schmitz, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:1102-1107, 2000), isolates of these species that were resistant to sitafloxacin, a new advanced-generation fluoroquinolone with a high potency and a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity, were found in high proportion in 23 European hospitals. Here, we investigate the clonal diversity of the 155 P. aeruginosa and 145 Acinetobacter spp. sitafloxacin-resistant isolates from that study by automated ribotyping. Numerous ribogroups (sets of isolates with indistinguishable ribotypes) were found among isolates of P. aeruginosa (n = 34) and Acinetobacter spp. (n = 16), but the majority of the isolates belonged to a limited number of major ribogroups. Sitafloxacin-resistant isolates (MICs > 2 mg/liter, used as a provisional breakpoint) showed increased concomitant resistance to piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, amikacin, gentamicin, and imipenem. The major ribogroups were repeatedly found in isolates from several European hospitals; these isolates showed higher levels of resistance to gentamicin and imipenem, and some of them appeared to correspond to previously described multidrug-resistant international clones of P. aeruginosa (serotype O:12) and Acinetobacter baumannii (clones I and II). Automated ribotyping, when used in combination with more discriminatory typing methods, may be a convenient library typing system for monitoring future epidemiological dynamics of geographically widespread multidrug-resistant bacterial clones.     

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Acinetobacter spp. by NCCLS broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods

Although both broth microdilution (BMD) and disk diffusion (DD) are listed by NCCLS as acceptable methods for testing Acinetobacter spp. for antimicrobial susceptibility, few studies have compared the results generated by the two methods. We tested 196 isolates of Acinetobacter spp. from nine U.S. hospitals and from the Centers for Disease Control culture collection by using BMD and DD and clinically appropriate antimicrobial agents. Categorical results for amikacin, ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, gentamicin, imipenem, levofloxacin, meropenem, tobramycin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole were comparable for the two methods: there was only one very major (VM) error, with tobramycin, and only one major (M) error, with meropenem, when DD results were compared with BMD results. However, VM errors were frequent with the beta-lactams and beta-lactam-beta-lactam inhibitor combinations, while M errors were often observed with tetracyclines. For BMD, tests frequently exhibited subtle growth patterns that were difficult to interpret, especially for beta-lactams. If subtle growth (i.e., granular, small button, or "starry" growth) was considered positive, error rates between BMD and DD were unacceptably high for ampicillin-sulbactam (VM error, 9.8%; minor [m] error, 16.1%), piperacillin (VM error, 5.7%; m error, 13.5%), piperacillin-tazobactam (VM error, 9.3%; m error, 12.9%), ceftazidime (VM error, 6.2%; m error, 11.4%), cefepime (VM error, 6.2%; m error, 13.0%), cefotaxime (m error, 21.2%), ceftriaxone (m error, 23.3%), tetracycline (M error, 11.4%; m error, 32.1%), and doxycycline (M error, 2.6%). When subtle growth patterns were ignored, the agreement still did not achieve acceptable levels. To determine if the problems with BMD testing occurred in other laboratories, we sent frozen BMD panels containing beta-lactam drugs and nine isolates to six labs with experience in performing BMD and DD. Among these laboratories, cefepime MICs ranged from < or =8 to > or =32 microg/ml for four of the nine strains, confirming the problem in interpreting BMD results. Discrepancies between the categorical interpretations of BMD and DD tests were noted primarily with cefepime and piperacillin, for which the BMD results were typically more resistant. Clinical laboratories should be aware of these discrepancies. At present, there are no data to indicate which method provides more clinically relevant information.     

Antibacterial activity of the new carbapenem meropenem (SM-7338) against clinical isolates

The in vitro antibacterial activity of the new carbapenem antibiotic meropenem (SM-7338) against 567 clinical isolates was evaluated. SM-7338 exhibited activity against a broad spectrum of organisms, including aerobes and anaerobes, and was superior to the other beta-lactam drugs tested (piperacillin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefoxitin). SM-7338 was more active than imipenem, gentamicin and amikacin againstEnterobacter cloacae andPseudomonas aeruginosa. SM-7338 was less potent than imipenem against staphylococci and enterococci, but the activity of the two antibiotics against anaerobes was similar. SM-7338 and imipenem showed a high bactericidal activity at a concentration of 2–4 x MIC.     

Correlation between sensitivity to fosfomycin and the presence of penicillinase PSE-1 in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

A prospective survey was carried out during three three-weeks periods in May, October 1997 and October 1998 in 13 teaching hospitals. All non-repetitive isolates of P. aeruginosa collected were subject to serotypage and determination of the inhibiting minimal concentrations for ticarcillin, piperacillin, piperacillin + tazobactam, ceftazidime, imipenem, amikacin, ciprofloxacin and fosfomycin. Identification of the betalactamases and quantification of the cephalosporinase were done for the strains intermediate or resistant to ticarcillin. The most frequent serotypes were O: 6 (17%), O: 11 (13%), O: 1 (10%) and O: 12 (9%). Serotype O: 12 was the least susceptible to antibiotics except for fosfomycin. Whatever the serotype, 76% of P. aeruginosa strains with bla PSE-1 are susceptible to fosfomycin, when only 29.8% of non bla PSE-1 producing strains were susceptible to this antibiotic. Integron encoding bla PSE-1 could be implicated in susceptibility to fosfomycin of P. aeruginosa strains. The associations fosfomycin + imipenem or fosfomycin + ceftazidime could be proposed in case of infections due to P. aeruginosa O: 12.     

Susceptibility of gentamicin sensitive and resistant gram negative bacilli to ceftazidime

The in-vitro activity of ceftazidime was compared with other third-generation cephalosporins and gentamicin against 409 isolates. Ceftazidime was the most active agent against Enterobacter sp., Proteus mirabilis, Serratia sp., Proteus sp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. It was less active against Escherichia coli and Klebsiella than moxalactam and cefotaxime but more active than cefoperazone. Against gentamicin resistant E. coli, Klebsiella, Enterobacter and P. aeruginosa, ceftazidime was more active than moxalactam, cefotaxime or cefoperazone but was as active as moxalactam against gentamicin-resistant Proteus sp. and more active than cefotaxime and cefoperazone.     

ICU患者痰细菌分布特征及药敏分析

目的统计分析2009年1～11月佛山市中医院ICU痰标本细菌培养病原菌分布特征及药敏情况,为临床经验用药提供科学的参考。方法留取经镜检合格的痰标本,经分离培养出病原菌后,以法国梅里埃VITEK2全自动细菌鉴定分析仪鉴定,以K-B法检测药物敏感性,用MICROSOFT OFFICE Excel2003进行数据处理。结果共分离出288株菌,病原菌分布以铜绿假单胞菌最多占20%,其次是金黄色葡萄球菌、鲍曼不动杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠埃希菌,分别是14%、13%、10%、7%。药敏结果显示,铜绿假单胞菌和鲍曼不动杆菌对头孢吡肟、头孢他啶、亚胺培南、阿米卡星等的敏感率均达75%以上;阿米卡星、亚胺培南和头孢西丁对肺炎克雷伯菌与大肠埃希菌的抗菌活性也较好;金黄色葡萄球菌对万古霉素、替考拉宁、呋喃妥因等的敏感率较高,均为75%以上,而对青霉素仅有2%的敏感率。结论痰培养病原菌以铜绿假单胞菌和金黄色葡萄球菌为主;对于革兰阴性杆菌,可选用第三代头孢菌素、氨基糖苷类抗生素,对革兰阳性球菌,可用万古霉素、替考拉宁、呋喃妥因。     

In vitro activity of tigecycline and comparators against gram-negative bacteria isolated from a tertiary hospital in Alexandria, Egypt

The emergence of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, in particular Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Klebsiella pneumoniae, has necessitated the search for alternative therapy by either introducing new agents or renewing interest in old agents. This study compares the in vitro activity of tigecycline (TIG), recently introduced to Egyptian market, to other potentially active antimicrobials as Colistin (COL), imipenem (IPM), levofloxacin (LEV), and piperacillin/tazobactam (PIP/TAZ) against 67 Gram-negative clinical isolates obtained from El- Meery Hospital in Alexandria, Egypt. El-Meery Hospital is a 1,500-bed tertiary teaching hospital where TIG has not been previously used. Based on MIC(90)s, TIG was found to be a comparator to IPM and COL (MIC(90)= 8?μg/ml). LEV and PIP/TAZ were less active than TIG exhibiting high MIC(90)s. TIG inhibited 100% of Escherichia coli and K. pneumoniae and 60% of Ps. aeruginosa and A. baumannii isolates. In time-kill studies against IPM-resistant isolates, TIG showed bactericidal activity after 6 hours of contact against the Enterobacteriaceae isolates and after 3 hours for the tested Ps. aeruginosa isolates at 4× and 8× MIC. Against A. baumannii, TIG exerted a bacteriostatic effect. TIG demonstrated variable ability to suppress biofilm formation affecting mainly E. coli and A. baumannii isolates. These results point TIG to be a promising agent in treatment of infections caused by strains for which adequate therapy has been limited. As far as we know, this is the first report evaluating the in vitro activity of TIG against Egyptian clinical isolates.     

醋酸钙-鲍曼不动杆菌复合体的精确鉴定与药敏分析

目的精确鉴定醋酸钙-鲍曼不动杆菌复合体菌株;检测菌株对氨基糖苷类抗生素和碳青霉烯类抗生素的敏感性。方法运用自动化分析仪VITEK 2试卡法对临床分离不动杆菌进行菌种鉴定,对鉴定为醋酸钙-鲍曼不动杆菌复合体的菌株进一步经16S rRNA序列分析确证其准确种属。分别用自动化分析仪VITEK 2和微稀释法测定精确鉴定后的醋酸钙-鲍曼不动杆菌复合体菌株对阿米卡星、庆大霉素、妥布霉素、亚胺培南和厄他培南五种抗生素的敏感性,分析药敏实验结果。结果共进行了232株不动杆菌的VITEK 2鉴定,其中195株鉴定为醋酸钙-鲍曼不动杆菌复合体。对195株醋酸钙-鲍曼不动杆菌复合体菌株进一步用16S rRNA序列分析确证其准确种属,结果显示173株为鲍曼不动杆菌,22株为醋酸钙不动杆菌。对173株鲍曼不动杆菌及22株醋酸钙不动杆菌分别用VITEK 2和微稀释法进行阿米卡星、庆大霉素、妥布霉素、亚胺培南和厄他培南五种抗生素的药敏检测。微稀释法药敏结果显示,受试鲍曼不动杆菌对三种氨基糖苷类抗生素均呈现高水平耐药,而对两种碳青霉烯类抗生素敏感度较高;受试醋酸钙不动杆菌对五种抗生素均呈现较高敏感度。与微稀释法药敏检测结果相比,VITEK 2试卡法药敏结果中受试鲍曼不动杆菌和醋酸钙不动杆菌对各抗生素的药敏检测结果均出现了不同程度的误差,鲍曼不动杆菌药敏检测结果中阿米卡星符合率最低,严重错误率高达34.10%;醋酸钙不动杆菌药敏检测结果中厄他培南符合率最低,重大错误率高达40.91%。结论 VITEK 2在不动杆菌种属鉴定中存在局限性,辅以16S rRNA序列分析,方可精确鉴定醋酸钙-鲍曼不动杆菌复合体。鲍曼不动杆菌对氨基糖苷类抗生素耐药现状严重。用VITEK 2进行鲍曼不动杆菌和醋酸钙不动杆菌对氨基糖苷类和碳青霉烯类的药敏测定时存在不同程度的误差,建议辅以微稀释法。