Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis due to anticonvulsants share certain clinical and laboratory features with drug‐induced hypersensitivity syndrome,despite differences in cutaneous presentations

Background. Drug‐induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS)/drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is characterized by late disease onset, fever, rash, hepatic dysfunction, haematological abnormalities, lymphadenopathy and often, human herpesvirus (HHV) reactivation. The diagnosis of DIHS is based on the combined presence of these findings. Anticonvulsants are a major cause of DIHS and may also cause Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). We examined whether SJS/TEN due to anticonvulsants display similar clinical and laboratory features seen in DIHS. Methods. Patients diagnosed with SJS or TEN due to anticonvulsants (n = 8) were examined and their clinical features and laboratory findings were compared with patients with anticonvulsant‐related DIHS (n = 6). Results. Seven of the eight patients with SJS/TEN developed symptoms > 3 weeks after starting anticonvulsants. Hepatic dysfunction was present in six patients with SJS/TEN and five patients with DIHS. Leucocytosis and/or eosinophilia was noted in seven patients with SJS/TEN and four patients with DIHS. Only one patient in the SJS/TEN group had atypical lymphocytosis; this was present in four patients with DIHS. Reactivation of HHV‐6 was detected in one of the four patients tested in the SJS/TEN group, although it was seen in five of the six patients with DIHS. Conclusions. TSJS/TEN due to anticonvulsants may exhibit some clinical and laboratory features of DIHS. The nature of the cutaneous involvement should be emphasized in the diagnosis of DIHS.     

Antiretroviral‐induced toxic epidermal necrolysis in a patient positive for human immunodeficiency virus

Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are two variants on a spectrum of severe systemic hypersensitivity characterized by blistering maculopapular lesions and desquamation of the skin and mucus membranes. Although several causative agents, including infections, have been reported for SJS/TEN, medications remain the most common cause. We report the case of a 42‐year‐old man with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) who developed TEN 4 months after starting treatment with darunavir and abacavir. The patient presented with upper body lesions, oral mucosal ulcerations, and impending airway compromise. He was intubated and admitted to the burns unit. Score for Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (SCORTEN) was 5, with > 90% predicted mortality. However, after intravenous immunoglobulin and supportive treatment, the patient made a remarkable recovery. Abacavir and darunavir may be associated with SJS/TEN. TEN should be considered a risk for patients with HIV and should be monitored for cutaneous eruptions for several months after changes in treatment regimen.     

Long‐term complications of Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN): the spectrum of chronic problems in patients who survive an episode of SJS/TEN necessitates multidisciplinary follow‐up

Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are severe adverse reactions to drugs that cause a life‐threatening eruption of mucocutaneous blistering and epithelial sloughing. While the acute complications of SJS/TEN are well described, it is increasingly recognized that survivors may develop delayed sequelae, some of which can be associated with significant morbidity. Studies of long‐term SJS/TEN outcomes mostly focus on mucocutaneous and ocular complications. However, other internal organs, such as the respiratory tract and gastrointestinal tract, can be affected. Psychological sequelae are also frequent following the trauma of widespread epidermal necrolysis. An appreciation of the ‘chronic’ phase of SJS/TEN is needed by clinicians caring for individuals who have survived the acute illness. This review aims to provide an update on the breadth and range of sequelae that can affect patients in the months and years following an acute episode of SJS/TEN.     

Erythema multiforme,Stevens‐Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis – diagnosis and treatment

Prior to the first international consensus classification published in 1993, the clinical distinction between erythema multiforme (EM), Stevens‐Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) had been subject to uncertainty and controversy for more than a century. Based on this classification, the three conditions are defined by the morphology of the individual lesions and their pattern of distribution. Etiopathogenetically, the majority of EM cases is caused by infections (primarily herpes simplex virus and Mycoplasma pneumoniae), whereas SJS/TEN are predominantly triggered by drugs. The SCORTEN (score of toxic epidermal necrolysis) can and should be used to assess disease prognosis in patients with SJS/TEN. While supportive treatment is generally considered sufficient for EM, there is still uncertainty as to the type of systemic therapy required for SJS/TEN. Given the lack of high‐quality therapeutic trials and (in some cases) conflicting results, it is currently impossible to issue definitive recommendations for any given immunomodulatory therapy. While there is always a trade‐off between rapid onset of treatment‐induced immunosuppression and an uptick in infection risk, there has been increasing evidence that cyclosporine in particular may be able to halt disease progression (i.e. skin detachment) and lower mortality rates. Assistance in diagnosis and management of the aforementioned conditions may be obtained from the Center for the Documentation of Severe Skin Reactions (dZh) at the Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.     

Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in patients with lupus erythematosus: a descriptive study of 17 cases from a national registry and review of the literature

Background Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are severe cutaneous adverse reactions with high morbidity and mortality. Some expressions of lupus erythematosus (LE) may cause enormous difficulties in differentiating them from SJS and TEN by showing large areas of sheet‐like epidermal necrosis. Objective To evaluate clinically and histopathologically probable or definite cases of SJS/TEN with a history of systemic or other LE [(S)LE]. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of validated cases of SJS/TEN with a history of (S)LE, based on a large population‐based national registry. Results Among 1366 patients with SJS/TEN, 17 with a sufficiently documented history of (S)LE and representative histological material could be identified, suggesting a considerable over‐representation of LE in patients with SJS/TEN. Eight of these showed clinically and/or histopathologically some LE‐characteristic features interfering with the diagnosis of SJS/TEN. Differentiation could be elaborated on clinical and histopathological grounds: four patients were classified as SJS/TEN with a preceding (S)LE exacerbation and/or LE‐typical histopathological features, and four as ‘TEN‐like’ (S)LE. Conclusion Most patients with SJS/TEN and a history of (S)LE demonstrate clinical and histopathological properties allowing clear differentiation. However, occasionally acute cutaneous manifestations of (S)LE and SJS/TEN can be phenotypically similar, caused by extensive epidermal necrosis. Although no feature by itself is conclusive, a combination of recent (S)LE exacerbation, evident photodistribution, annular lesions and absent or only mild focal erosive mucosal involvement may favour LE over SJS/TEN clinically. Histopathologically, in particular, junctional vacuolar alteration, and the presence of solitary necrotic keratinocytes at lower epidermal levels, combined with moderate to dense periadnexal and perivascular lymphocytic infiltrates with a variable presence of melanophages, and mucin point to a LE‐related origin.     

Critical factors differentiating erythema multiforme majus from Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN)

Erythema multiforme majus (EMM) and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are severe cutaneous reactions characterised by targetoid erythematous lesions and mucocutaneous involvement. The initial skin manifestations are similar, making early diagnosis difficult. We retrospectively reviewed 36 cases of EMM and 18 cases of SJS/TEN and also evaluated 6 patients with unclassified EMM. 13 patients in the EMM group and 16 patients in the SJS/TEN group presented with a high fever (>38.5?C; p<0.001). Two or more mucous membranes were affected in 6 patients in the EMM group and 18 patients in the SJS/TEN group. Significantly more SJS/TEN than EMM patients had high levels of C-reactive protein and severe hepatic dysfunction. Thirteen EMM and 13 SJS/TEN cases were caused by medications/drugs. Skin biopsy samples showed stronger mononuclear cell infiltration in the EMM than in the SJS/TEN group (p<0.001). The mean dose of initial systemic corticosteroid used to treat EMM was lower than that used to treat SJS/TEN. No patients died in either group. Clinically, the unclassified cases mostly behaved like EMM. The results of our investigation suggest that EMM and SJS/TEN are distinct conditions and they help in differentiating these syndromes at an early stage.     

Rapid remission of Stevens–Johnson syndrome by combination therapy using etanercept and intravenous immunoglobulin and a review of the literature

Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) are spectrum of rare, acute, and life‐threatening delayed‐type drug hypersensitivity reactions that are associated with high mortality rates. However, no therapeutic standard has been proposed for SJS/TEN. Here, we report a case of a patient diagnosed with Stevens–Johnson syndrome whose disease progression was halted by a single dose of etanercept and was treated successfully. In addition, we reviewed the literature reporting patients with SJS/TEN treated with similar regimens.     

Severe pneumonia caused by combined infection with Pneumocystis jiroveci, parainfluenza virus type 3, cytomegalovirus, and Aspergillus fumigatus in a patient with Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are severe adverse cutaneous reactions to drugs. We report here the first case of severe pneumonia caused by an unusual combined infection with Pneumocystis carinii (jiroveci), parainfluenza virus type 3, cytomegalovirus and Aspergillus fumigatus in a 63-year-old female patient with allopurinol-induced SJS/TEN overlap syndrome. Following treatment with high-dose systemic corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin for SJS/TEN, her mucocutaneous lesions improved and she was due to be discharged. However, 15 days after cessation of corticosteroids, she developed pneumonia. Broncho-alveolar lavage revealed that the cause of infection was Pneumocystis carinii (jiroveci), parainfluenza virus type 3, cytomegalovirus and Aspergillus. These findings indicate that patients with SJS/TEN, particularly those treated with systemic corticosteroids, may be susceptible to infection with combinations of pathological agents resulting from damage to the bronchial epithelia.     

Efficacy and safety of cyclosporine in Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis

Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare but life threatening cutaneous reactions that are most commonly caused by exposure to medications. This review assesses the efficacy and safety of cyclosporine therapy for SJS, TEN, and SJS/TEN overlap. A literature review was conducted in PubMed using the MeSH terms TEN, SJS, and cyclosporine. Five case series and one meta‐analysis were analyzed. From review of the existing literature, cyclosporine appears to not only have a mortality benefit in the treatment of SJS/TEN, but also a relatively safe side effect profile.     

Association of HLA-B*1502 allele with carbamazepine-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens-Johnson syndrome in the multi-ethnic Malaysian population

Background Carbamazepine (CBZ), a frequently used anticonvulsant drug, is one of the most common causes of life‐threatening cutaneous adverse drug reactions such as toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) and Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS). Recent studies have revealed a strong association between HLA‐B*1502 and CBZ‐induced TEN/SJS in the Taiwan Han Chinese population. Objectives This study is aimed to investigate the association between human leucocyte antigens (HLA) and CBZ‐induced TEN/SJS in the multi‐ethnic Malaysian population. Methods A sample of 21 unrelated patients with CBZ‐induced TEN/SJS and 300 race‐matched, healthy controls were genotyped for HLA‐A, ‐B and ‐DR using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Allele frequencies were compared. Results HLA‐B*1502 was present in 75.0% (12/16) of Malay patients with CBZ‐induced TEN/SJS but in only 15.7% (47/300) of normal controls (odds ratio 16.15, 95% confidence interval 4.57–62.4; corrected P‐value = 7.87 × 10^?6), which suggests a strong association between HLA and CBZ‐induced TEN/SJS. Additionally, HLA‐B*1502 was found in all three Chinese and two Indian patients. Existing data show that frequencies of the HLA‐B*1502 allele are generally much higher in Asian populations than in White European populations, which explains the higher incidences of SJS and TEN in Asian countries. Conclusions HLA‐B*1502 is strongly associated with CBZ‐induced TEN/SJS in the Malay population in Malaysia, as has been seen in Han Chinese in Taiwan. This indicates that the genetic association apparent in the incidence of CBZ‐induced TEN/SJS is linked with the presence of HLA‐B*1502, irrespective of racial origin. Screening of patients for this genetic marker can help to prevent the occurrence of TEN/SJS.     

Drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms vs toxic epidermal necrolysis: the dilemma of classification

According to contemporary vernacular, when the cutaneous manifestations of drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic signs (DRESS) syndrome are those of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) or toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), the condition is defined as "DRESS syndrome with severe cutaneous reactions". In this article, we have presented arguments for and against including patients with skin lesions of the SJS/TEN syndromes who also have fever (practically all of the patients) and internal organ involvement (most of the patients) under the definition of DRESS syndrome. After weighing the arguments for and against this alteration of definition, we conclude that it makes more sense for patients with SJS/TEN to be classified as such and not be lumped together under the misleading label of DRESS syndrome.     

Toxic epidermal necrolysis induced by phenytoin and whole brain radiotherapy

Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) have been associated with some drugs, particularly anticonvulsants such as phenytoin. Some authors have pointed out an increased risk of TEN/SJS when phenytoin is associated with whole brain radiotherapy. We report a patient diagnosed with breast adenocarcinoma and brain metastases that was on treatment with phenytoin and, shortly after receiving whole brain radiotherapy, developed toxic epidermal necrolysis.     

Stevens‐Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in children: a review of the experience with paediatric patients in a University Hospital

Background Stevens‐Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are life‐threatening drug reactions considered to be part of the spectrum of a single pathological process. Objective To describe the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of SJS/TEN in children attended at our hospital. Materials and methods Retrospective study of children diagnosed with SJS/TEN between 1999 and 2009 in a University Hospital provided with regional‐level burn and paediatric intensive care units. Results We found 14 paediatric patients (eight SJS and six TEN). They presented an average of 60% of the body surface area affected and 31% of epidermal sloughing. The average of suspected drugs was 1.7 per patient, anticonvulsants (carbamazepine, phenytoin and lamotrigine) and antibiotics (penicillin and macrolides) being the most frequent ones. Silver sulfadiazine was the topical treatment most frequently used, 86% of patients received systemic steroids and 28.5% intravenous immunoglobulins. One patient died. Conclusions The SJS/TEN complex is a true dermatological critical condition that also affects children. Any drug can be the causative agent, more frequently anticonvulsants and antibiotics. Depending on the extension of the affected body surface, patients should be rapidly admitted to a critical care area with experience in the care of burn patients. Discontinuation of the suspected offending drugs is mandatory. Optimal supportive care and management of denuded skin areas are still the mainstay of treatment. The use of specific therapies remains controversial. Compared with adults, the disease in children seems to be milder with lower mortality.     

Efficacy of additional i.v. immunoglobulin to steroid therapy in Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis

Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare and life‐threatening cutaneous adverse drug reactions. While there is no established therapy for SJS/TEN, systemic corticosteroids, plasma exchange and i.v. immunoglobulin (IVIG) have been used as treatment. The efficacy of IVIG is still controversial because total doses of IVIG used vary greatly from one study to another. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of IVIG, administrated for 5 days consecutively, in an open‐label, multicenter, single‐arm study in patients with SJS or TEN. IVIG (400 mg/kg per day) administrated for 5 days consecutively was performed as an additional therapy to systemic steroids in adult patients with SJS or TEN. Efficacy on day 7 of IVIG was evaluated. Parameters to assess clinical outcome were enanthema including ophthalmic and oral lesions, cutaneous lesions and general condition. These parameters were scored and recorded before and after IVIG. We enrolled five patients with SJS and three patients with TEN who did not respond sufficiently to systemic steroids before IVIG administration. All of the patients survived and the efficacy on day 7 of the IVIG was 87.5% (7/8 patients). Prompt amelioration was observed in skin lesions and enanthema in the patients in whom IVIG therapy was effective. Serious side‐effects from the use of IVIG were not observed. IVIG (400 mg/kg per day) administrated for 5 days consecutively seems to be effective in patients with SJS or TEN. IVIG administrated together with steroids should be considered as a treatment modality for patients with refractory SJS/TEN. Further studies are needed to define the therapeutic efficacy of IVIG.     

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS): a clinical update and review of current thinking

Summary Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) describes a severe medication-induced adverse reaction, which has cutaneous, haematological and solid-organ features. It is one of the triad of life-threatening drug hypersensitivity dermatoses, along with acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) and Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN). In this article, we discuss several controversies that surround DRESS, including problems with nomenclature and the lack of consensus in diagnostic criteria.     

Possible involvement of CD14+ CD16+ monocyte lineage cells in the epidermal damage of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis

Background Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are characterized by keratinocyte apoptosis and necrosis, resulting in epidermal detachment. Although monocytes abundantly infiltrate the epidermis in SJS/TEN skin lesions, the properties and functions of these cells have not been fully examined. Objectives To determine the properties of monocytes infiltrating into the epidermis in SJS/TEN. Methods Immunostaining of skin sections was performed to examine the membrane markers of monocytes infiltrating into skin lesions. Results Immunostaining of cryosections from 11 SJS/TEN skin lesions revealed numerous CD14+ monocytes located along the dermoepidermal junction and throughout the epidermis. The cells coexpressed CD16, CD11c and HLA‐DR. CD14+ CD16+ cells were identified in very early lesions without epidermal damage, suggesting that their infiltration is a cause, rather than a result, of epidermal damage. Moreover, these cells expressed CD80, CD86 and CD137 ligand, indicative of their ability to facilitate the proliferation and cytotoxicity of CD8+ T cells. CD16+ cells infiltrating the epidermis and detected at the dermoepidermal junction were immunostained and counted in paraffin‐embedded skin sections obtained from 47 patients with drug rash manifested as TEN, SJS, maculopapular‐type rash or erythema multiform‐type rash. The number of CD16+ monocytes infiltrating the epidermis increased significantly, depending on the grade of epidermal damage. Conclusions These findings suggest that the appearance of CD14+ CD16+ cells of monocyte lineage plays an important role in the epidermal damage associated with SJS/TEN, most probably by enhancing the cytotoxicity of CD8+ T cells.     

Severe flucloxacillin‐induced acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), with toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN)‐like features: does overlap between AGEP and TEN exist? Clinical report and review of the literature

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) and Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare but severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions. Especially in TEN, large areas of the skin and mucosae may become detached. Although AGEP and SJS/TEN are distinct entities with a different clinical picture, pathogenesis, prognosis and treatment, they may share some features, raising the hypothesis of overlap between both entities. We present a severe case of AGEP, caused by flucloxacillin, clinically presenting with TEN‐like features and pronounced systemic symptoms with haemodynamic and respiratory instability. Furthermore, we present a review of the literature on cases of AGEP with features resembling SJS/TEN or a supposed overlap with SJS/TEN.     

Distinguishing between erythema multiforme major and Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis immunopathologically

The early clinical presentations of Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are similar to that of erythema multiforme major (EMM). Cytotoxic molecules, especially granulysin, are expressed in the skin lesions of SJS/TEN and cause extensive keratinocyte death. It is postulated that the function of regulatory T cells (Treg) in SJS/TEN is inadequate. This study examined whether an immunohistological examination of cytotoxic molecules and the immunophenotype of Treg is useful for discriminating SJS from EMM in the early period. Over the past 9 years, the lesional skin of 14 patients with SJS/TEN and 16 patients with EMM was biopsied. Double immunofluorescence labeling of CD8 and granulysin, perforin, or granzyme B was performed, and immunohistochemical analyses of granulysin, perforin, granzyme B, CD1a, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD68 and Foxp3 were conducted using a highly sensitive indirect immunoperoxidase technique. The number of cells positive for each antibody per five high‐power fields was counted. The proportions of granulysin⁺ cells/CD8⁺ cells (P = 0.012) and perforin⁺ cells/CD8⁺ cells (P = 0.037) in SJS/TEN were significantly higher than in EMM. The number of Foxp3⁺ cells/five high‐power fields in SJS/TEN was significantly lower than in EMM (P = 0.004). Similarly, the number of CD4⁺ cells/five high‐power fields in SJS/TEN was significantly lower than in EMM (P = 0.0017). These data suggest that these panels of antibodies for labeling cytotoxic molecules, CD4 and Treg are useful for discriminating early SJS/TEN and EMM with a skin biopsy.     

Epidermal necrolysis: 60 years of errors and advances

Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare conditions characterized by extensive epidermal detachment and mucositis. Both are associated with a high mortality rate and significant long‐term morbidity. Since the initial report introducing the term TEN in 1956, diagnosis of the condition has been fraught with difficulties that continue to exist today. The terms ‘erythema multiforme major’ (EMM) and SJS, and their relationship to TEN have also been confusing to clinicians. It is now recognized that EMM is a different entity from SJS and TEN in terms of demographics, causality and severity. SJS and TEN represent a continuum of disease, and differ only by the extent of epidermal detachment and therefore severity. The term ‘epidermal necrolysis’ (EN) is used in this article to describe the spectrum of disease that includes SJS and TEN. Important advances in understanding the pathomechanism and treatment of EN have been made over the years. These include the recognition of human leucocyte antigen (HLA) associations (e.g. HLA‐B*1502 with carbamazepine‐induced TEN) and understanding of the pathogenic roles of drug‐specific cytotoxic T cells and granulysin. It was previously believed that widespread keratinocyte death in EN is predominantly mediated by soluble Fas‐ligand and that intravenous immunoglobulin therapy is useful in blocking this mechanism with resultant survival benefits. Further studies have since proven these theories to be incorrect. This short review describes the key advances in the terminology, classification, causality and treatment of EN, and identifies future priorities and challenges in the understanding and management of this condition.     

The psychological impact of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis on patients’ lives

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare conditions (affecting 1-2 people per million per year) usually caused by a severe immune reaction to certain medications and, in some cases, the cause may be linked to particular infections. Those affected are likely to have a loss of skin and mucous membranes. People who get these conditions become very ill quickly and experience severe pain. SJS and TEN can have long-term physical effects such as skin, eye, breathing and stomach problems. Little is known about the psychological effects on patients’ lives. This research was inspired by a man diagnosed with TEN. Because he appeared anxious and fearful, the authors questioned how SJS/TEN affected patients’ lives. The authors systematically searched for research papers regarding SJS and TEN, to help understand the psychological impact of these conditions on patients’ lives, and they found six relevant studies. The findings highlight that some healthcare practitioners lacked information about the conditions, leading to fear and anxiety in patients. Some patients had symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety and depression. The findings conclude that SJS/TEN impacts psychologically on patients’ lives. The authors suggest that, if healthcare practitioners are educated about SJS/TEN, this should assist them to provide patients with the information and support which they need in order to be less anxious. In addition, on discharge, patients should have a follow up appointment with a relevant healthcare practitioner to reduce the possibility of PTSD occurring. Linked Article:   O’Reilly et al. Br J Dermatol 2020; 183 :452–461 .