Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Using an Uncemented Metaphyseal Sleeve,Rotating Hinge Prosthesis: A Case Series of 99 Patients

BackgroundHinge knee replacement is a salvage procedure with historically high failure and complication rates. We aim to analyze the use of an uncemented metaphyseal sleeve revision knee replacement in our unit—a third-generation rotating hinge knee prosthesis. This is the largest reported series of this implant with longest follow up.MethodsWe retrospectively identified 99 revision cases performed (2002-2018). In total, 67 of 99 (68%) cases were performed for aseptic etiology, whereas 32 of 99 (32%) cases were performed for infection. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Oxford Knee Score, survivorship analysis, and incidence of revision/reoperations. Mean follow-up was 7 years (range 1.5-18).ResultsAt follow-up, the mean Oxford Knee Score had improved from 10 points to 25 points. At mean 7 years of follow up, 18 of 99 cases had undergone revision giving a survivorship of 81% (90% aseptic). In total, 10 of 18 cases were performed for infection (10%) and 9 of 18 cases were performed for aseptic reasons (9%), of which 5 were for patella resurfacing (2 revision), 2 for failure of bony ingrowth, and 1 for fracture. Twenty-six patients (26%) had complications postoperatively, with patella disorders and reduced range of movement the most common. Patients who did not undergo patella resurfacing were significantly more likely to need revision of any cause (P = .01).ConclusionThis is the largest study of this prosthesis with longest follow-up. It demonstrates good survivorship and improvement in knee pain. Those with infection are at greatest risk of revision. Significant numbers have patella dysfunction/anterior knee symptoms therefore patella resurfacing should be considered when using this implant.Level of EvidenceIV.     

The Fate and Relevance of the Patella in Two-Stage Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BackgroundIt remains unclear whether reimplantation of a patellar component during a two-stage revision for periprosthetic total knee arthroplasty infection (PJI) affects patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) or implant survivorship. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether patellar resurfacing during reimplantation confers a functional benefit or increases implant survivorship after two-stage treatment for PJI.MethodsTwo-stage revisions for knee PJI performed by three surgeons at a single tertiary care center were reviewed retrospectively. All original patellar components and cement were removed during resection and the patella was resurfaced whenever feasible during reimplantation. PROMs, implant survivorship, and radiographic measurements (patellar tilt and displacement) were compared between knees reimplanted with a patellar component versus those without a patellar component.ResultsA total of 103 patients met the inclusion criteria. Forty-three patients (41.7%) underwent reimplantation with, and 60 patients (58.3%) without a patellar component. At a mean follow-up of 33.5 months, there were no significant differences in patient demographics or PROMs between groups (P ≥ .156). No significant differences were found in the estimated Kaplan-Meier all-cause, aseptic, or septic survivorship between groups (P ≥ .342) at a maximum of 75 months follow-up. There was no significant difference in the change (pre-resection to post-reimplant) of patellar tilt (P = .504) or displacement (P = .097) between the groups.ConclusionPatellar resurfacing during knee reimplantation does not appear to meaningfully impact postoperative PROMs or survivorship. Given the risk of potential extensor mechanism complications with patellar resurfacing, surgeons may choose to leave the patella without an implant during total knee reimplantation and expect similar clinical outcomes.Level of EvidenceLevel III.     

Press-fit metal-backed rotating patella: seven- to 14-year followup

A consecutive series of 80 patients with 110 press-fit metal-backed rotating platform patella resurfacing surgeries were reviewed at an average of 107 months followup (range, 84-167 months). Twenty-eight patients died before followup. Fifty-two patients (70 patellae) were available for clinical and radiographic followups. One patella was revised for failure of the patella component. Four patellae were revised along with revision of the knee replacement. One patella realignment procedure was done for recurrent subluxation of the patella. There were no patellar dislocations in this series, no patella fractures, and no disruption of the quadriceps tendon or infrapatellar ligament. Six patellae had subluxation seen on postoperative radiographs. The incidence of patellar tilt greater than 5 degrees was 13%. No patellae were considered radiographically loose. The incidence of radiolucencies was 37%. Subsidence of the component superiorly was identified in 39% of the patellae, and inferiorly in 36% of the patellae. Of the 49 patients (67 knees) returning for followup, 70% of the knees were rated as excellent, 10% were rated good, 15% were rated fair, and 5% were rated poor. Press-fit metal-backed patella provided good component durability with only one revision because of component failure. Radiographic analyses showed a high incidence of subsidence associated with good clinical results.     

Outcomes of Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty for Secondary Osteonecrosis of the Knee

BackgroundSecondary osteonecrosis of the knee (SOK) generally occurs in relatively young patients; at advanced stages of SOK, the only viable surgical option is total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We conducted a retrospective study to investigate implant survivorship, clinical and radiographic outcomes, and complications of contemporary cemented bicompartmental TKA with/without patellar resurfacing for SOK.MethodsThirty-eight cemented TKAs in 27 patients with atraumatic SOK, mean age 43 years (17 to 65), were retrospectively reviewed. Seventy-four percent had a history of corticosteroid use, and 18% had a history of alcohol abuse. Patellar osteonecrosis was coincidentally found in six knees (16%), and all were asymptomatic without joint collapse. The mean followup was 7 years (2 to 12). Knee Society Score (KSS) and radiographic outcomes were evaluated at 6 weeks, 1 year, then every 2 to 3 years.ResultsNinety-two percent had implant survivorship free from revision with significant improvement in KSS. Causes of revision included aseptic tibial loosening (one), deep infection (one), and instability with patellofemoral issues (one). Four of six cases also with patellar osteonecrosis received resurfacing, including one with periprosthetic patellar fracture after minor trauma, with satisfactory clinical results after conservative treatment. None of the unrevised knees had progressive radiolucent lines or evidence of loosening. An unresurfaced patella, use of a stem extension or a varus-valgus constrained prosthesis constituted 18%, 8% and 3%, respectively.ConclusionCemented TKAs with selective stem extension in patients with SOK had satisfactory implant survivorship and reliable outcomes. Secondary osteonecrosis of the patella should be carefully evaluated prior to operation.     

Patella resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: results of a randomized controlled clinical trial at a minimum of 10 years' followup

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty remains controversial. This study evaluates the results of resurfacing and nonresurfacing the patella in a randomized controlled, clinical trial at a minimum of 10 years followup. One hundred knees (90 patients) with osteoarthritis were enrolled in a prospective randomized clinical trial using a posterior-cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Patients were randomized to receive resurfacing or retention of the patella. Evaluations were done preoperatively and yearly, up to a minimum of 10 years (range, 10.1-11.5 years) postoperatively. Disease-specific (Knee Society clinical rating score) and functional (stair climbing, flexion/extension torques, patellar examination) outcomes were measured. Patient satisfaction, anterior knee pain, and patellofemoral questionnaires were completed. Intraoperative grading of the articular cartilage was done. No patients were lost to followup; 45 patients remained alive. Nine revisions (in nine of 90 knees; 10%) were done in seven patients in the nonresurfaced group (15% of knees) and in two patients in the resurfaced group (5% of knees). No significant difference was found between the groups regarding revision rates, Knee Society clinical rating scores, and functional, patient satisfaction, anterior knee pain, patellofemoral, and radiographic outcomes. Intraoperative cartilage quality was not a predictor of outcome. This study currently is the longest followup of a randomized controlled, clinical trial that examines patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. The results showed no significant difference between the groups for all outcome measures at a minimum of 10 years of followup.     

Patellar resurfacing reduces pain after TKA for juvenile rheumatoid arthritis

Influence of patellar resurfacing after knee replacement and the frequency of patella infera and its relation to the postoperative appearance of the knee pain were assessed in patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Seventy-seven total knee arthroplasties using the AGC prosthesis with nonconstrained components were done on 52 patients with a mean followup of 7.3 years (range, 3-13 years). Anterior knee pain was present in 14 of 30 patients (47%) with an unreplaced patella and in two of 18 patients (11%) with patella resurfacing. The patella was replaced in 18 patients (35%) and in 23 of 77 knees (30%). Neither revision surgery of implanted patellar components nor any later resurfacing of an unreplaced patella were done during the followup. Preoperatively using the Insall-Salvati ratio, the majority of knees (54 of 77) had a low-riding patella. Patella infera occurred commonly in patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. No connection between patella infera and anterior knee pain was found.     

Implant survivorship and complication rates after total knee arthroplasty with a third-generation cemented system: 5 to 8 years followup

We evaluated implant survivorship, reoperation rates, and complication rates of a group of patients who had total knee arthroplasty with a third-generation cemented prosthetic device using cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized designs at 5 to 8 years followup. Three hundred thirty-four consecutive primary total knee arthroplasties (186 cruciate retaining and 148 posterior stabilized) were done in 287 patients at our institution during a 2-year period. Kaplan Meier survivorship using revision for any reason and revision for aseptic loosening as endpoints were 95.9% and 99.5% respectively at 8 years. Nine patients (four with cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties, five with posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasties; 3.1%) had reoperations for any reason. No patients had reoperation for problems related to the patellofemoral joint. Thirty-two patients (11.1%) had intraoperative or postoperative complications. There were no differences in any of the outcomes analyzed between patients who had cruciate-retaining or posterior-stabilized total knee replacements. Our results show that with appropriate patient selection and meticulous attention to surgical technique, excellent clinical and radiographic results can be achieved with a third-generation total knee arthroplasty system at intermediate followup.Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level III-2 (retrospective cohort study).     

Secondary resurfacing of the patella for persistent anterior knee pain after primary knee arthroplasty

Out of a total of 623 patients who, over a ten-year period, underwent primary total knee replacement (TKR) without patellar resurfacing, 20 underwent secondary resurfacing for chronic anterior knee pain. They were evaluated pre- and postoperatively using the clinical and radiological American Knee Society score. The mean follow-up was 36.1 months (12 to 104). The mean knee score improved from 46.7 to 62.2 points and the mean functional score from 44.7 to 52.2 points. Only 44.4% of the patients, however, reported some improvement; the remainder reported no change or deterioration. The radiographic alignment of the TKR did not influence the outcome of secondary resurfacing of the patella. Complications were noted in six of the 20 patients including fracture and instability of the patella and loss of movement. Anterior knee pain after TKR remains difficult to manage. Secondary resurfacing of the patella is not advocated in all patients since it may increase patient dissatisfaction and hasten revision.     

Outcomes of patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a 9-year experience based on a case series of scorpio PS knees

Patellar resurfacing during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an actively debated issue. This prospective study addresses fundamental questions regarding whether to resurface the patella. To do this, we compared clinical results of Scorpio PS knees with and without patellar resurfacing to determine whether there was any statistically significant difference in survivorship, function, pain, and radiographic analyses. Our study failed to demonstrate any statistical difference between the 2 groups (resurfaced versus nonresurfaced) according to knee pain, walking abilities, stair climbing, range of motion, and radiologic findings, as well as cross-correlations between patellar pain and age, gender, obesity, or etiology. Our radiologic findings did not reveal any failures of bony structures facing the metallic flange. Some knee designs can thus be seen as "patella friendly." Given the significant cost of patella resurfacing and the resulting well-known complications, we continue to avoid systematic resurfacing of the patella during Scorpio TKA.     

Selective patellar nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. 10 year results.

Patella nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty was reviewed retrospectively in 49 knees (42 patients). Thirteen patients (17 knees) died leaving 29 patients (32 knees) in the final study group. The minimum length of followup was 10 years and averaged 11.7 years (range, 10-13.4 years). The diagnosis was primary osteoarthritis in 26 knees, posttraumatic arthritis in four, osteonecrosis in one, and Paget's disease in one. Patients were evaluated using the Knee Society score, a patella score, and radiographs. The mean Knee Society score improved from 52.8 to 87.5 points postoperatively and functional score improved from 57.5 to 84.5 points postoperatively. Anterior knee pain was reported in six knees (20%). Only one patient required secondary resurfacing of the patella because of postoperative anterior knee pain. No significant correlation was found between anterior knee pain and patellofemoral joint space, patellar sclerosis, Insall-Salvati ratio, patellar tilt, gender, obesity, or age. Based on the need for secondary patellar resurfacing because of anterior knee pain, the 10-year survival was 97.5%. At minimum 10-year followup, retaining the patella in total knee arthroplasty in selected patients with osteoarthritis of the osteoarthritic knee can yield acceptable results.     

Revision of hip resurfacing arthroplasty

Metal-on-metal (MOM) hip resurfacing has become an increasingly popular treatment for young, active patients with degenerative disease of the hip, as bearing surfaces with better wear properties are now available. One proposed advantage of resurfacing is its ability to be successfully revised to total hip arthroplasty (THA). In addition, radiographic parameters that may predict failure in hip resurfacing have yet to be clearly defined. Seven MOM resurfacing arthroplasties were converted to conventional THAs because of aseptic failure. Using Harris Hip Scores (HHS) and Short Form 12 (SF-12) questionnaire scores, we compared the clinical outcomes of these patients with those of patients who underwent uncomplicated MOM hip resurfacing. In addition, all revisions were radiographically evaluated. Mean follow-up periods were 51 months (revision group) and 43 months (control group). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups' HHS or SF-12 scores. There was no dislocation or aseptic loosening after conversion of any resurfacing arthroplasty. Valgus neck-shaft angle (P < .03) was associated with aseptic failure of MOM hip resurfacing. Conversion of aseptic failure of hip resurfacing to conventional THA leads to clinical outcomes similar to those of patients who undergo uncomplicated hip resurfacing. The orientation of the femur and the components placed play a large role in implant survival in hip resurfacing. More work needs to be done to further elucidate these radiographic parameters.     

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial

BACKGROUND: The management of the patella in total knee arthroplasty is still problematic. We aimed to identify differences in the clinical outcome of total knee arthroplasty according to whether or not patellar resurfacing had been performed in a prospective, randomized study of 220 osteoarthritic knees. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty total knee arthroplasties in 201 patients were randomly assigned to be performed with either resurfacing or retention of the patella, and the results were followed for a mean of forty-eight months (range, thirty-six to seventy-nine months) in a double-blind (both patient and clinical evaluator blinded), prospective study. Evaluation was performed annually by an independent observer and consisted of assessment with the Knee Society clinical rating system, specific evaluation of anterior knee pain, a stair-climbing test, and radiographic examination. RESULTS: Fifteen (12%) of the 128 knees without patellar resurfacing and nine (10%) of the ninety-two knees with patellar resurfacing underwent a revision or another type of reoperation related to the patellofemoral articulation. This difference was not significant (chi square with one degree of freedom = 0.206, p = 0.650). At the time of the latest follow-up, there was a significantly higher incidence of anterior pain (chi square with one degree of freedom = 5.757, p = 0.016) in the knees that had not had patellar resurfacing. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent patellar resurfacing had superior clinical results in terms of anterior knee pain and stair descent. However, anterior knee pain still occurred in patients with patellar resurfacing, and nine (10%) of the ninety-two patients in that group underwent a revision or another type of reoperation involving the patellofemoral joint. Weight but not body mass index was associated with the development of anterior knee pain in the patients without patellar resurfacing, a finding that suggests that patellofemoral dysfunction may be a function of joint loading rather than obesity.     

Evidence in orthopaedics: patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty

Abstract Four good quality randomized clinical trials comparing patellar resurfacing versus noresurfacing in knee arthroplasty are analyzed. The outcomes evaluated were anterior knee pain, scores on the Knee Societys rating system and reoperation.No relevant differences were found in knee scores, but anterior knee pain was less frequent in patients with patellar resurfacing. Few patients had severe anterior knee pain. Still, patients with anterior knee pain were less satisfied with the clinical result. Studies with longer follow-up showed that anterior knee pain increased with time in both groups. A clinically relevant increase in reoperation rate in the nonresurfaced group could not be excluded with the numbers available.Anterior knee pain seems to be influenced by the decision of resurfacing the patella during knee arthoplasty. Although it is not associated with important changes in knee scores, patients perceive it as a cause of insatisfaction. Influence of patellar resurfacing on implant supervivence is not clear.     

Revision resurfacing knee arthroplasty for aseptic loosening

This re-investigation presents our experience with revision resurfacing knee arthroplasty caused by aseptic failure. The evaluation of the results should elucidate the benefit of revision, its complications as well as the impact of the implant type used. The study involved 36 patients whose primary resurfacing knee prostheses failed by aseptic loosening. The rather elderly patients (average 68.3 years) underwent revision 6 years later on average. In 30 cases (83.3%), arthroplasty could be repeated with resurfacing implants, whereas the use of hinge prostheses was unavoidable in 6 knees (16.7%). After an average of 7 years later, 30 knees were re-investigated according to the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scoring system. Results were compared with the HSS values prior to revision. Complications and revised implant survivorship were reported chronologically. The revision knees had a 80% incidence of improved HSS score. In 73.3% the outcome was graded as good or even excellent. In contrast, scoring values before revision were dissatisfying without exception. The early complication rate after operation was 25%. Persisting pain, instability and limited mobility led to repeated revision in two cases and arthrodesis of one of the knees. The outcome of revision after 7 years revealed a remarkable early complication rate. Nevertheless, good or excellent results could be scored after implantation of PFC, PFC-modular, TC and TCIII prostheses. Received: 29 October 1996     

One-peg versus three-peg patella component fixation in total knee arthroplasty.

In many designs of total knee arthroplasty, the patella with one central peg has been replaced by a patella with three small pegs for cement fixation. There have been recent reports of failure of this design. This is a prospective, consecutive study of two types of patella component fixation in 228 posterior-stabilized knee arthroplasties done by one surgeon. A central peg all-polyethylene component was used for 84 consecutive knees in 63 patients (Group A) and a three-peg patella was used for the next 144 consecutive knees in 99 patients (Group B). The mean followup was 6.7 years (range, 2-10 years) for Group A and 3.5 years (range, 2-6 years) for Group B. Except for the patellar component fixation, all knees had the same posterior-stabilized prosthesis using a specific protocol for patellar resurfacing. No patient required reoperation for a patellofemoral complication. The prevalence of patella fracture was higher in Group A, 4.7% (four knees), compared with 2.1% (three knees) in Group B, but this difference was not statistically significant. The presence of anterior knee pain referable to the patella was 7.1% (five patients, six knees) in Group A (one patient with two knees had severe anterior knee pain) and 9% (13 knees in 13 patients) in Group B. There was no patella clunk syndrome, subluxation, or fracture of a fixation peg in either group. With this specific protocol for patella resurfacing, there was a higher rate of complications with the one central peg patella (4.7%) than with the three-peg patella (2.1%), but this did not reach statistical significance. The results do not support an increased risk of component failure with this three-peg patella design, but do not, at this length of followup, show any significant advantage of three-peg fixation.