Altered hemodynamics during exercise in older essential hypertensive subjects

This study was designed to compare the resting and exercise hemodynamics of older adults with moderate hypertension with those of age-matched normotensive controls. Thirty-one hypertensive (20 men, 11 women; mean age, 63.9 +/- 2.8 years) and 28 normotensive subjects (15 men, 13 women; mean age, 62.6 +/- 2.4 years) were studied. There were no differences between the groups in terms of body weight, body composition, and maximal O2 consumption (VO2). At rest, there were no differences in VO2, cardiac output, stroke volume, or heart rate between the two groups, although systolic (158 +/- 13 vs 121 +/- 12 mm Hg) and diastolic blood pressures (94 +/- 7 vs 79 +/- 8 mm Hg) were higher in the hypertensive subjects. The hypertensive subjects' elevated blood pressure at rest was the result of a higher total peripheral resistance. During exercise, the hypertensive subjects had a lower cardiac output and stroke volume, no difference in heart rate and VO2, higher systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressures, and a higher total peripheral resistance compared with their normotensive peers. The results indicate that older hypertensive persons have an altered cardiovascular response to exercise as compared with age-matched normotensive subjects. The responses also indicate that older essential hypertensive persons do not undergo excessive myocardial demands during exercise of the intensity usually prescribed in rehabilitation programs.     

Exercise performance in patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension. Effects of nifedipine-induced acute blood pressure reduction.

In untreated patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension, exercise induces an abnormal increase in blood pressure; the influences of this increase on exercise were evaluated by a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPX) performed in control conditions (step 1) and during acute blood pressure reduction (step 2). Patients were classified as (1) normotensive (resting diastolic blood pressure [BPd] less than 90 mm Hg; n = 14), (2) mildly hypertensive (BPd of 90 to 104 mm Hg; n = 9), and (3) moderately to severely hypertensive (BPd greater than or equal to 105 mm Hg; n = 16). For the three groups, peak mean blood pressure during exercise was 125 +/- 5 mm Hg (mean +/- SEM), 144 +/- 3 mm Hg (p less than 0.01 vs normotensive), and 161 +/- 4 mm Hg (p less than 0.01 vs normotensive and p less than 0.01 vs mild hypertension), respectively. Oxygen consumption (VO2) at peak exercise and at ventilatory anaerobic threshold was 26.1 +/- 1.1 and 17.2 +/- 0.5 ml/min/kg, 25.4 +/- 1.1 and 16.9 +/- 0.8 ml/min/kg, and 26.4 +/- 1.3 and 17.5 +/- 1.2 ml/min/kg in normotensive subjects, those with mild hypertension, and those with moderate to severe hypertension, respectively. Fourteen normotensive subjects, six with mild hypertension, and nine with moderate to severe hypertension participated to step 2 (nifedipine vs placebo, double-blind crossover). Nifedipine reduced blood pressure at rest and at peak exercise in those with hypertension. Peak exercise VO2 was unaffected by nifedipine in both normotensive subjects and those with hypertension. With nifedipine, ventilatory anaerobic threshold occurred earlier and at a lower VO2 in mild and in moderate to severe hypertension (delta VO2 = -1.9 and -2.4 ml/min/kg, respectively). These findings might be due to nifedipine-induced redistribution of blood flow during exercise and might be the reason for the complaint of weakness after blood pressure reduction in hypertensive subjects.     

Exercise hypertension: its measurement and evaluation

Blood pressure, the central parameter in the diagnosis of arterial hypertension, is subject to a high degree of variability. The dilemma for the evaluating physician is that he has no true value for the resting blood pressure that is both comparable and reproducible. Reproducibility, however, is an essential requirement for all diagnostic procedures in medicine. A standardized ergometric procedure (at workloads of 50 to 100 watts [W]; incremented 10 watts/min; cuff blood pressure measurements) is suitable to obtain comparable, reproducible monitoring of the blood pressure response in both pressure response in both normotensive subjects and hypertensive patients. The blood pressure behavior during and after ergometric exercise was investigated in 552 males in order to clarify if this standardized procedure is suitable for differentiating between normotensive subjects and hypertensive patients. The following normal upper limits for blood pressure values in men and women between the ages of 20 and 50 years of 200/100 mmHg (mean + 1 SD) at a workload of 100 W as well as 140/90 mmHg in the fifth minute of the recovery phase were obtained. Patients suffering from mild hypertension showed significantly (p less than 0.001) higher blood pressures (213 +/- 22/116 +/- 11 mmHg) at 100 W and after exercise than age-matched normotensives (188 +/- 14/92 +/- 9 mmHg) but significantly (p less than 0.001) lower values than hypertensives with stable hypertension (225 +/- 22/126 +/- 11 mmHg). Moreover, the systolic pressure response to ergometric work was significantly (p less than 0.05 to p less than 0.01) influenced by age. Using the normal upper limits for blood pressure during and after ergometry, the ergometric procedure revealed that 50% of the patients with borderline hypertension at rest could be classified as hypertensives. Their blood pressure response at 100 W (216 +/- 21/113 +/- 8 mmHg) did not significantly differ from the patients with mild hypertension. In contrast, in the 50% who reacted negatively to ergometric testing, the systolic blood pressure response at 100 W (204 +/- 18 mmHg) was significantly (p less than 0.01) lower than that of those who demonstrated a positive reaction, revealing exactly the same diastolic blood pressure value of 92 mmHg as the normotensives. Follow-up examinations several years (average 3.8 years) subsequently showed that 97% of the ergometric-positive borderline hypertensives developed established hypertension. Thus an early diagnosis of arterial hypertension was achieved years before its established manifestation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Haemodynamic contributions to post-exercise hypotension in young adults with hypertension and rapid resting heart rates.

The haemodynamic effects of 45 min of treadmill exercise (at 70% of resting heart rate reserve) were determined in 5 young adults with hypertension and rapid resting heart rates (greater than 90 beats/min in clinic) and were compared with those of 5 age-matched normotensive subjects. Blood pressure was lower after exercise in the hypertensive, but not the normotensive subjects. Mean cardiac output before exercise was similar in the two groups, and fell from 6.8 +/- 0.6 before to 5.4 +/- 0.6 l/min 60 min after exercise in the hypertensive group (P less than 0.01). Total peripheral resistance tended to be higher at this time. Neither variable was affected by prior exercise in the normotensive group. The depressor effects of prior exercise on mean arterial pressure (-8.6 +/- 1.0 vs. -1.4 +/- 2.5 mmHg; P less than 0.04) and cardiac output (-1.4 +/- 0.3 vs. -0.1 +/- 0.1 l/min; P less than 0.005) and the increase in total peripheral resistance (+3.0 +/- 1.2 vs. 0.0 +/- 1.0 Units; P less than 0.05) were greater in the hypertensive group. Thus, the post-exercise hypotension in this selected group of young hypertensive subjects with rapid resting heart rates was mediated by a decrease in cardiac output and stroke volume disproportionate to the fall in blood pressure, suggesting sustained compromise of their cardiac performance after acute exercise.     

Blood pressure response to treadmill testing among medical graduates: the right time to intervene

BACKGROUND: Longitudinal studies have revealed significant correlation between exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise and higher incidence of developing resting hypertension in future. Normotensive persons at high risk of developing systemic hypertension have greater cardiovascular reactivity to exercise. METHODS AND RESULTS: Our study compared the blood pressure response to treadmill exercise in normotensive offspring of the hypertensive parents (age 22 +/- 1.7 years, n = 50; study group) with those of the normotensive parents (age 22 +/- 1.4 years, n = 50; control group). The morphometric characteristics, resting, exercise (treadmill exercise with Bruce protocol) and recovery blood pressure values of all the subjects were recorded. The analysis showed that the difference in mean peak systolic blood pressure during exercise was the only statistically significant parameter in the study and control groups (188.52 +/- 25.16 mmHg and 178.56 +/- 14.96 mmHg, respectively, p < 0.05). The number of hyperreactors (defined as peak systolic blood pressure > 200 mmHg during exercise) was significantly more in study group compared to control group (10 and 3 respectively). The mean resting systolic blood pressure of hyperreactors (126.46 + 8.49 mmHg) falls in the pre-hypertension category as designated by JNC VII. Also, their resting diastolic blood pressure, recovery blood pressure and body mass index were significantly higher as compared to normoreactors. Conclusions: Our study showed that this response pattern could represent impairment in cardiovascular adjustment to exercise indicating a greater risk for development of resting hypertension in the future. Therefore there is a need for early lifestyle modifications to postpone/prevent development of hypertension.     

Short-term effect of dynamic exercise on arterial blood pressure

BACKGROUND. To quantify the duration of postexercise hypotension at different exercise intensities, we studied six unmedicated, mildly hypertensive men matched with six normotensive controls. METHODS AND RESULTS. Each subject wore a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitor at the same time of day for 13 consecutive hours on 3 different days. On each of the 3 days, subjects either cycled for 30 minutes at 40% or 70% maximum VO2 or performed activities of daily living. There was no intensity effect on the postexercise reduction in blood pressure, so blood pressure data were combined for the different exercise intensities. Postexercise diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure were lower by 8 +/- 1 (p less than 0.001) and 7 +/- 1 mm Hg (p less than 0.05), respectively, than the preexercise values for 12.7 hours in the hypertensive group. These variables were not different before and after exercise in the normotensive group. Systolic blood pressure was reduced by 5 +/- 1 mm Hg (p less than 0.05) for 8.7 hours after exercise in the hypertensive group. In contrast, systolic blood pressure was 5 +/- 1 mm Hg (p less than 0.001) higher for 12.7 hours after exercise in the normotensive group. When the blood pressure response on the exercise days was compared with that on the nonexercise day, systolic blood pressure (135 +/- 1 versus 145 +/- 1 mm Hg) and mean arterial pressure (100 +/- 1 versus 106 +/- 1 mm Hg) were lower (p less than 0.05) on the exercise days in the hypertensive but not in the normotensive group. We found a postexercise reduction in mean arterial pressure for 12.7 hours independent of the exercise intensity in the hypertensive group. Furthermore, mean arterial pressure was lower on exercise than on nonexercise days in the hypertensive but not in the normotensive group. CONCLUSION. These findings indicate that dynamic exercise may be an important adjunct in the treatment of mild hypertension.     

Relation between exercise-induced hypertension and sustained hypertension in adult patients after successful repair of aortic coarctation

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether exercise-induced hypertension in successfully repaired adult post-coarctectomy patients is associated with hypertension on 24-h blood pressure measurement and increased left ventricular mass. METHODS: One hundred and forty-four consecutive post-coarctectomy patients (mean age 31.5 years, range 17-74 years; mean age at repair 7.9 years, range 0-45 years) from three tertiary referral centres were studied using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, treadmill exercise testing and echocardiography. RESULTS: Of the 144 patients, 27 (19%) were known to have sustained hypertension, based on their history, and all were on antihypertensive medication. However, 32 (27%) of the remaining 117 patients showed elevated mean daytime systolic blood pressure readings at 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (systolic blood pressure > or = 140 mmHg). Of the remaining 85 patients with normal mean daytime systolic blood pressure, 18 patients (21%) had exercise-induced hypertension (maximal exercise systolic blood pressure > 200 mmHg). Mean daytime systolic blood pressure was higher in the exercise-induced hypertensive patients compared to the normotensive patients with normal exercise blood pressure (134 +/- 5 versus 129 +/- 7 mmHg, P = 0.008). By multivariate analysis, both maximal exercise systolic blood pressure (P = 0.007) and resting systolic blood pressure (P < 0.0001) were independently associated with mean daytime systolic blood pressure. Maximal exercise systolic blood pressure had no independent predictive value for left ventricular mass (P = 0.132). CONCLUSIONS: In adult post-coarctectomy patients, maximal exercise systolic blood pressure is independently associated with mean daytime systolic blood pressure at ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. In this study no independent predictive value of maximal exercise systolic blood pressure for left ventricular mass could be demonstrated.     

Walking 10,000 steps/day or more reduces blood pressure and sympathetic nerve activity in mild essential hypertension.

We investigated the effects of walking 10,000 steps/day or more on blood pressure and cardiac autonomic nerve activity in mild essential hypertensive patients. All subjects were males aged 47.0+/-1.0 (mean+/-SEM) years old. The original cohort consisted of 730 people in a manufacturing industry who measured the number of steps they walked each day using a pedometer. Eighty-three of these subjects walked 10,000 steps/day or more for 12 weeks. Thirty-two of these were hypertensives with systolic blood pressure (SBP) greater than 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) greater than 90 mmHg. Thirty of these hypertensive subjects (HT) were examined twice, once during the pre- and once during the post-study period, for body mass index (BMI), maximal oxygen intake (Vo2max), blood pressure, heart rate (HR), and autonomic nerve activity by power spectral analysis of SBP and HR variability. In the HT group, walking 13,510+/-837 steps/day for 12 weeks lowered blood pressure (from 149.3+/-2.7/98.5+/-1.4 to 139.1+/-2.9/90.1+/-1.9 mmHg; p<0.01, respectively). In both the 34 normotensive controls and 17 hypertensive sedentary controls, blood pressure did not change. Walking also significantly lowered low-frequency fluctuations in SBP as an index of sympathetic nerve activity, from 1.324+/-0.192 to 0.738+/-0.154 mmHg2/Hz (p<0.05). VO2max rose significantly from 26.1+/-2.4 to 29.5+/-2.5 ml/kg/min (p<0.05). There were no changes in parasympathetic nerve activity, baroreceptor reflex sensitivity, or BMI. Our results indicate that walking 10,000 steps/days or more, irrespective of exercise intensity or duration, is effective in lowering blood pressure, increasing exercise capacity, and reducing sympathetic nerve activity in hypertensive patients.     

Left ventricular systolic response to exercise in patients with systemic hypertension without left ventricular hypertrophy

Supine exercise radionuclide angiography was performed in 367 men to assess left ventricular (LV) systolic response to exercise; 58 had systemic hypertension without LV hypertrophy on a resting electrocardiogram and 309 were normotensive. All patients met the following criteria defining a low pretest likelihood of coronary artery disease: age less than 50 years; normal electrocardiographic response to exercise; absence of typical or atypical chest pain; and exercise heart rate greater than 120 beats/min. Patients taking beta-receptor blockers were excluded. There were no significant differences between hypertensive and normotensive groups in peak exercise heart rate, workload or exercise duration. However, hypertensive patients had significantly higher peak exercise systolic blood pressures and peak exercise rate-pressure products. There were no differences between patients with and without hypertension in resting ejection fraction, peak exercise ejection fraction (hypertensive patients 0.71 +/- 0.01, normotensive patients 0.70 +/- 0.05) or change in ejection fraction at peak exercise (hypertensive patients 0.07 +/- 0.01, normotensive patients 0.07 +/- 0.04). Diastolic and systolic ventricular volumes tended to be smaller in the hypertensive patients, but the difference was not statistically significant. The change in systolic volume with exercise was similar in the 2 groups (hypertensive -10 +/- 3 ml/m2, normotensive -10 +/- 1 ml/m2). In the absence of electrocardiographic evidence of LV hypertrophy, systemic hypertension does not influence LV systolic response to exercise.     

Absence of post exercise hypotension and sympathoinhibition in normal subjects: additional evidence for increased sympathetic outflow in borderline hypertension

OBJECTIVE: In young men (mean age 25 years) with borderline hypertension the authors have documented a reduction in systolic blood pressure and muscle sympathetic nerve activity 60 mins after 45 mins of submaximal treadmill exercise. The aim of this study was to determine if post exercise hypotension occurs in normotensive young men, and if so, if it is accompanied by a decrease in sympathetic nerve activity. DESIGN: Replicating a previous protocol, the authors recorded blood pressure, heart rate, plasma noradrenaline and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (microneurography; peroneal nerve) before and 60 mins after submaximal treadmill exercise. SUBJECTS: Ten healthy male volunteers (mean age 28 +/- 5 years). INTERVENTION: Forty-five minutes of treadmill exercise at 70% of resting heart rate reserve. MAIN RESULTS: In contrast to borderline hypertensive subjects, prior exercise had no effect on either systolic or diastolic blood pressure or muscle sympathetic nerve activity in healthy volunteers. Plasma noradrenaline concentrations were similar before and after exercise. Resting heart rate (56 +/- 3 versus 70 +/- 3 beats/min; P less than 0.002), and sympathetic burst frequency (10 +/- 4 versus 20 +/- 2 bursts/min; P = 0.026) were lower in normal than in borderline hypertensive men. CONCLUSIONS: At rest, discharge to muscle sympathetic nerves is increased in young borderline hypertensive men; and blood pressure and sympathetic nerve activity are decreased after exercise in borderline hypertensive but not normotensive men. These observations suggest that the depressor response to prolonged rhythmic exercise in young men with borderline hypertension may be due in part to transient suppression of augmented central sympathetic outflow.     

Relationship between ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and response of blood pressure in male hypertensive adolescents to exercise

BACKGROUND: High blood pressure in the young has been related to the development of hypertension in adults; hence the importance of identifying adolescents with the risk of developing it.OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and the response of blood pressure in adolescents to exercise. DESIGN: A prospective and cross-sectional study. METHODS: We classified 101 men aged 13-18 years as obese hypertensive, lean hypertensive, obese normotensive, and lean normotensive. Mean blood pressure and variability were measured with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and expressed as 24 h, awake, and sleeping periods. Treadmill tests were also performed. RESULTS: Hypertensives and obese normotensives had higher ambulatory blood pressure monitoring values (P< 0.0001). Systolic blood pressure during sleep in obese subjects was significantly higher than that in lean usbjects (119.9 +/- 9 versus 113.6 +/- 8 mmHg, P < 0.001, obese hypertensives versus lean hypertensives; and 113.6 +/- 2 versus 103.0 +/- 2 mmHg, P < 0.002, obese normotensives versus lean normotensives) and nocturnal drop of systolic blood pressure was lower in obese subjects. We found a significant correlation between systolic blood pressure during ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and systolic blood pressure during moderate and maximal exercise for all periods (P < 0.0001). Blood pressure variability during awake period was higher in subjects with maximum exercise systolic blood pressure >/= 200 mmHg (7.4 +/- 2 versus 6.4 +/- 2%, P < 0.01).CONCLUSION: Systolic blood pressure measured by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is related to response of systolic blood pressure to exercise and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring can identify groups of subjects at greater than normal risk through their higher blood pressure during sleep. Greater than normal blood pressure variability in adolescents is an indicator of the risk of reaching abnormal exercise values of systolic blood pressure. Higher casual blood pressure than ambulatory blood pressure monitoring values for adolescents should be considered abnormal.     

Patients with a hypertensive response to exercise have impaired left ventricular diastolic function

An exaggerated increase in systolic blood pressure prolongs myocardial relaxation and increases left ventricular (LV) chamber stiffness, resulting in an increase in LV filling pressure. We hypothesize that patients with a marked hypertensive response to exercise (HRE) have LV diastolic dysfunction leading to exercise intolerance, even in the absence of resting hypertension. We recruited 129 subjects (age 63+/-9 years, 64% male) with a preserved ejection fraction and a negative stress test. HRE was evaluated at the end of a 6-min exercise test using the modified Bruce protocol. Patients were categorized into three groups: a group without HRE and without resting hypertension (control group; n=30), a group with HRE but without resting hypertension (HRE group; n=25), and a group with both HRE and resting hypertension (HTN group; n=74). Conventional Doppler and tissue Doppler imaging were performed at rest. After 6-min exercise tests, systolic blood pressure increased in the HRE and HTN groups, compared with the control group (226+/-17 mmHg, 226+/-17 mmHg, and 180+/-15 mmHg, respectively, p<0.001). There were no significant differences in LV ejection fraction, LV end-diastolic diameter, and early mitral inflow velocity among the three groups. However, early diastolic mitral annular velocity (E') was significantly lower and the ratio of early diastolic mitral inflow velocity (E) to E' (E/E') was significantly higher in patients of the HRE and HTN groups compared to controls (E': 5.9+/-1.6 cm/s, 5.9+/-1.7 cm/s, 8.0+/-1.9 cm/s, respectively, p<0.05). In conclusion, irrespective of the presence of resting hypertension, patients with hypertensive response to exercise had impaired LV longitudinal diastolic function and exercise intolerance.     

Prevalence of sustained hypertension and obesity in urban and rural school going children in Ludhiana

BACKGROUND: Increasing trend of hypertension is a worldwide phenomenon. The data on sustained hypertension in school going children is scanty in India. The present study was conducted to evaluate the prevalence of sustained hypertension and obesity in apparently healthy school children in rural and urban areas of Ludhiana using standard criteria. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 2467 apparently healthy adolescent school children aged between 11-17 years from urban area and 859 students from rural area were taken as subjects. Out of total 3326 students, 189 were found to have sustained hypertension; in urban areas prevalence of sustained hypertension was 6.69% (n=165) and in rural area it was 2.56% (n=24). Males outnumbered females in both rural and urban areas. The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure of hypertensive population in both urban and rural population was significantly higher than systolic and diastolic blood pressure in their normotensive counterparts (urban normotensive systolic blood pressure:115.48+/-22.74 mmHg, urban hypertensive systolic blood pressure: 137.59+/-11.91 mmHg, rural normotensive systolic blood pressure: 106.31+/-19.86 mmHg, rural hypertensive systolic blood pressure: 131.63+/-10.13 mmHg, urban normotensive diastolic blood pressure: 74.18+/-17.41 mmHg, urban hypertensive diastolic blood pressure: 84.58+/-8.14 mmHg, rural normotensive diastolic blood pressure: 68.84+/-16.96 mmHg, rural hypertensive diastolic blood pressure: 79.15+/-7.41 mmHg). Overweight populationwas significantly higher in urban area. There were 287 (11.63%) overweight students and 58 (2.35%) were obese. In rural population overweight and obese students were 44 (4.7%) and 34 (3.63%) respectively. There was significant increase in prevalence of hypertension in both rural and urban population with increased body mass index in urban students; those with normal body mass index had prevalence of hypertension of 4.52% (n=96), in overweight it was 15.33% (n=44) and in obese it was 43.10% (n=25). In rural area, the overweight students showed prevalence of sustained hypertension in 6.82% (n=3) and in obese group it was 61.76% (n=21). None of the student with normal body mass index in rural area was found to be hypertensive. The mean body mass index of hypertensive population in both rural and urban areas was significantly higher than respective normotensive population (mean body mass index in urban normotensive group: 20.34+/-3.72 kg/m2, hypertensive group: 24.91+/-4.92 kg/m2; mean body mass index in rural normotensive group: 18.41+/-3.41 kg/m2, hypertensive group: 21.37+/-3.71 kg/m2, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of sustained hypertension is on the rise in urban area even in younger age groups. Blood pressure is frequently elevated in obese children as compared to lean subjects. This is possibly related to their sedentary lifestyle, altered eating habits, increased fat content of diet and decreased physical activities.     

Nocturnal continuous measurement of blood pressure in sleep apnea syndromes. Comparison between normotensive and hypertensive patients

Sleep apnea syndrome and systemic hypertension are frequently associated but their causal relationship is unclear. We compared the oscillations of systemic blood pressure and heart rate during polysomnography in 8 normotensive subjects (2 females) and 5 hypertensive (supine awake blood pressure: 165 +/- 7/96 +/- 5 mmHg) without treatment. Their ages (normotensive: 52.1 +/- 11.0 yrs, hypertensive: 51.2 +/- 6.4 yrs) and body mass indices (32.6 +/- 9.6 kg/m2 vs 33.2 +/- 5.2 kg/m2 respectively) were not statistically different. Systemic blood pressure was continuously monitored by a non invasive digital plethysmography (Finapres). Both groups had similar respiratory events indices (normotensive: 45.2 +/- 18.1/hr, hypertensive: 48.4 +/- 20.5/hr) and minimal oxygen saturations (79.4 +/- 9.1% vs 82.4 +/- 7.0% respectively). During apneas in slow-wave sleep were observed the minimal values for systolic and diastolic pressures which were significantly higher in hypertensive than in normotensive (138.2 +/- 9.6/83.2 +/- 16.1 mmHg vs 105.9 +/- 11.1/60.5 +/- 10.9 mmHg respectively). During resumption of ventilation maximal blood values were recorded which were also higher in hypertensive than in normotensive (185.0 +/- 13.8/113.2 +/- 21.5 mmHg vs 155.9 +/- 19.8/88.7 +/- 17.1 mmHg respectively) (p less than 0.05). Although absolute variations of blood pressure were similar, relative changes in systolic pressure were significantly higher in normotensive (p less than 0.05). Maximal heart rate was 76.8 +/- 6.2 bpm in normotensive and 76.6 +/- 3.9 bpm in hypertensive during resumption of ventilation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Blood pressure at rest and during maximal dynamic and isometric exercise as predictors of systemic hypertension

This study sought to verify evidence that transient high blood pressure (BP) at rest and during dynamic and isometric exercise is often predictive of later hypertension. In addition these 3 predictors were compared. One hundred office patients (all men) with BPs less than 140/90 mm Hg, ages 28 to 79 years, who had little or no heart disease and were not taking medication, had BPs taken at rest and during treadmill and handgrip dynamometer. Within 14 years, 16 subjects developed hypertension and 84 remained normotensive. Multivariate statistical comparisons for systolic and diastolic BPs and their interactions were used to discriminate between later hypertensive and normotensive subjects. The best single predictor was resting diastolic BP, classifying 88% of hypertensive and 69% of normotensive subjects correctly, followed closely by handgrip and treadmill diastolic BP and resting, treadmill and handgrip systolic BP. The best prediction was by the interaction between resting diastolic BP X handgrip diastolic BP; this classified 88% of hypertensive and 80% of normotensive subjects correctly. Of the few known precursors of hypertension, high BP at rest and during dynamic and isometric stress provides a means of alerting to careful follow-up and early treatment.     

Impaired cardiopulmonary response to exercise in moderate hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the limiting factors of exercise performance in subjects with hypertension associated with left ventricular hypertrophy. The secondary objective was to establish relationship between peripheral function and exercise capacity. DESIGN: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing was conducted using two protocols: a graded exercise test to maximal effort established maximal exercise capacity, followed by a step-incremental test combining gas-exchange measures and radionuclide angiography. The exercise responses were compared within and between groups. SETTING: All hypertensive subjects were selected from the Toronto Tri-Hospital Hypertension Clinic. Normal subjects were recruited from the surrounding community. PATIENTS: Twelve patients with established hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (determined by echocardiography) were studied as a referred/volunteer sample. All had no evidence of coincident diseases and were unmedicated at time of testing. A volunteer sample of normal, healthy subjects acted as a control. INTERVENTIONS: Graded exercise to maximum and step-incremental (submaximal and steady-state) exercise was used to quantify cardiopulmonary function during exercise stress. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: These included (for exercise performance) maximal oxygen intake (VO2max), the ventilatory anaerobic threshold, total peripheral resistance and blood lactate. Cardiac function measures included ejection fraction and ventricular volumes. RESULTS: Cardiac function data obtained during exercise in hypertensive subjects included an increase in the pressure to volume ratio, but a blunted ejection fraction response at peak exercise (P less than 0.05). Although end-diastolic volume increased during exercise (P less than 0.05), values were lower during both levels of exercise compared with normal subjects. Mean +/- SD end-systolic volume increased from 39 +/- 22 at rest to 42 +/- 23 mL during peak exercise. Hypertensive subjects had a lower VO2 max (mean 27.4 +/- 4.8 mL/kg/min) compared with normals (40.0 +/- 8.5 mL/kg/min) and a lower ventilatory anaerobic threshold (14.4 +/- 2.9 versus 27.6 +/- 5.8 mL/kg/min, P less than 0.005). Furthermore, hypertensive patients had a significantly elevated total peripheral resistance at rest (2.5 +/- 1.0 versus 1.8 +/- 0.4 peripheral resistance units) and at peak exercise (1.6 +/- 0.7 versus 0.8 +/- 0.2, P less than 0.01) compared with normal subjects (P less than 0.05). A correlation coefficient of 0.92 was found between total peripheral resistance and VO2 max in hypertensive subjects (P less than 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that peripheral factors, specifically a failure to reduce significantly total peripheral resistance, limits exercise performance despite a maintenance of left ventricular function during exercise in patients with moderate hypertension. The use of cardiopulmonary exercise testing can help in identifying the underlying cause of exercise intolerance in this population and limited left ventricular reserve at peak exercise, and may offer a sensitive measure of therapeutic end-points.     

Effects of phenylpropanolamine and isometric exercise on blood pressure

The effects of a single dose of phenylpropanolamine (PPA) and isometric handgrip exercise were studied to determine whether the combination increases blood pressure more than either one alone. Six normotensive subjects performed 2 min of exercise at 30 percent of maximal effort before, 1 and 2 h after PPA 37.5 mg (immediate release formulation) or placebo. PPA alone increased the sitting systolic blood pressure at 2 h (PPA 7.2 +/- 8.2 mmHg, placebo - 1.8 +/- 3.4 mmHg, P = 0.016) but did not increase diastolic blood pressure. Handgrip exercise increased systolic and diastolic blood pressures to a similar extent 2 h after PPA (24.0 +/- 8.2/18.3 +/- 7.7 mmHg) or placebo (24.7 +/- 8.2/21.0 +/- mmHg). However, the total increase in systolic blood pressure after PPA + exercise at 2 h (increase in resting blood pressure + increase due to exercise, 31.2 +/- 8.9 mmHg) was greater than after placebo + exercise (22.8 +/- 9.3 mmHg, P = 0.048). These data suggest that the effects of PPA and handgrip exercise on blood pressure are additive. Because the contribution of PPA alone to the blood pressure increase was small and the dose of PPA used was greater than in most over-the-counter formulations, this interaction is probably of limited clinical importance.     

Impaired left ventricular functional reserve in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy

To determine whether patients with hypertension and especially those with left ventricular hypertrophy have subtle changes in cardiac function, we measured the increase in left ventricular ejection fraction and in systolic blood pressure to end-systolic volume index ratio with exercise in 40 hypertensive patients and 16 age-matched normotensive volunteers. Twenty-two hypertensive patients without hypertrophy had normal end-systolic wall stress at rest and exercise responses. In contrast, the 18 patients with echocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy demonstrated a significant increase in end-systolic wall stress at rest compared with normal subjects (69 +/- 16 vs. 55 +/- 15 10(3) x dyne/cm2, p less than 0.05) despite having normal resting left ventricular size and ejection fraction. In patients with left ventricular hypertrophy, the increase in ejection fraction with exercise was less than in the normotensive control subjects (7 +/- 7 vs. 12 +/- 8 units, p less than 0.05), and delta systolic blood pressure to end-systolic volume with exercise was reduced (3.3 +/- 3.8 vs. 8.3 +/- 7.7 mm Hg/ml/m2, p less than 0.05). The hypertensive patients with hypertrophy displayed a shift downward and to the right in the relation between systolic blood pressure to end-systolic volume ratio and end-systolic wall stress compared with control subjects and hypertensive patients without left ventricular hypertrophy. Thus, hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy by echocardiography and normal resting ejection fraction exhibit abnormal ventricular functional responses to exercise. This finding may have implications in identifying patients at higher risk for developing heart failure.     

Decrease in blood pressure and increase in total peripheral vascular resistance in supine resting subjects with normotension or essential hypertension

Hemodynamic changes in the supine resting position were investigated in 70 male subjects, consisting of 15 healthy volunteers with normotension (blood pressure of 113 +/- 7/70 +/- 5 mmHg, M +/- SD), 25 patients with borderline essential hypertension (143 +/- 12/90 +/- 6 mmHg) and 30 patients with established essential hypertension (166 +/- 13/108 +/- 6 mmHg). The supine position reduced blood pressure, heart rate, stroke volume and cardiac output (p less than 0.001), but increased total peripheral vascular resistance (p less than 0.001). The decrease in systolic blood pressure (p less than 0.01), stroke volume (p less than 0.05) and cardiac output (p less than 0.05), and the increase in total peripheral vascular resistance (p less than 0.01) were significantly greater in the borderline and established essential hypertensive groups than in the normotensive group. The results demonstrated that the decrease in blood pressure was due to a reduction in both heart rate and stroke volume, and that the decrease in stroke volume and increase in total peripheral vascular resistance seen in the supine position were greater in the hypertensive groups than in the normotensive group. These hyperresponses may contribute to the development and persistence of high blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension.     

Increased central body fat deposition precedes a significant rise in resting blood pressure in male offspring of essential hypertensive parents: a 5 year follow-up study.

OBJECTIVES: As long as offspring of essential hypertensive parents (OHyp) are lean, their blood pressure usually remains within normal limits. The mechanism(s) transforming this 'genetically dysregulated normotension' into hypertension are unclear. We hypothesized that OHyp are not only genetically prone to develop hypertension, but may also have a particular propensity to accumulate central body fat. DESIGN: A 5-year follow-up cohort study. SETTING: University Hospital in Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: Seventeen young (25 +/- 1 years, mean +/- SD), lean healthy normotensive male OHyp and 17 age- and sex-matched offspring of normotensive parents (ONorm) paired for baseline blood pressure with the OHyp. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Resting and exercise blood pressure, body weight, body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-hip ratio were assessed at baseline and after 5 years. RESULTS: At baseline, body weight, BMI, waist-to-hip ratio and blood pressure did not differ significantly between OHyp and ONorm. At follow-up, body weight was increased in both groups (from 73.9 +/- 6.0 to 77.7 +/- 8.1 kg in OHyp, P = 0.008, and from 71.5 +/- 6.9 to 73.5 +/- 6.6 kg in ONorm, P = 0.03). BMI followed a similar pattern. In contrast, waist-to-hip ratio increased in OHyp (from 0.84 +/- 0.03 to 0.87 +/- 0.03, P = 0.012), but not in ONorm (from 0.84 +/- 0.03 to 0.84 +/- 0.04, P = 0.79) and was therefore higher in OHyp at follow-up (P = 0.011, OHyp versus ONorm). Peak systolic blood pressure during dynamic exercise also rose at 5 years in the OHyp (from 182 +/- 10 to 214 +/- 17 mmHg, P = 0.0001) while resting systolic blood pressure only tended to do so (from 121 +/- 7 to 128 +/- 12 mmHg, P = 0.07). In ONorm, resting and peak dynamic exercise systolic blood pressure remained unchanged (119 +/- 11 versus 121 +/- 9 mmHg, baseline versus follow-up, P = 0.40, and 186 +/- 12 versus 196 +/- 22 mmHg, P = 0.10, respectively). Thus, systolic peak exercise blood pressure was significantly (P = 0.014) elevated at follow-up in OHyp compared to ONorm, while resting systolic blood pressure only tended (P = 0.06) to do so. CONCLUSIONS: Initially lean normotensive OHyp have a disparate long-term course of central body fat as compared to ONorm. Thus, OHyp are not only genetically prone to develop hypertension, but they also have a particular propensity to accumulate central body fat, even before a distinct rise in resting blood pressure occurs. The exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise observed at follow-up in the OHyp represents another marker that confers them a greater risk of developing future hypertension.