Quantitative detection of hepatitis B virus DNA in sera from patients with acute hepatitis B

Two hundred forty-four serial serum samples from 30 adults hospitalized with benign (nonfulminant) acute hepatitis B were tested for the presence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA by a quantitative solution hybridization assay using a¹²⁵I-labeled DNA probe complementary to HBV-DNA sequences. Acute hepatitis B was self-limiting in 28 and progressed to chronicity in the remaining two patients. Of the 28 patients with self-limiting hepatitis, 21 (75%) were hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive, 26 (93%) were HBV-DNA positive, and one patient (3.6%) was negative for both markers on admission to the hospital. HBV-DNA cleared after HBeAg clearance in 20 (71.4%), before HBeAg clearance in five (17.9%) and simultaneously with the loss of HBeAg in the remaining two (7.1%) of the 27 initially HBV-DNA- and/or HBeAg-positive patients. Moreover, HBV-DNA remained detectable in serum for 13.3±6.6 (range: 4–22) days after the appearance of anti-HBe in 71.4% of these patients. In contrast, HBV-DNA and HBeAg remained persistently positive in the two patients who developed chronic HBV infection. These data show that: (1) viremia frequently persists after disappearance of HBeAg and (2) appearance of anti-HBe does not indicate the cessation of HBV replication in adults with acute self-limiting hepatitis B.     

Identification of a hepatitis B virus S gene mutant in lamivudine-treated patients experiencing HBsAg seroclearance

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Seroclearance of hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg) is a rare event in chronic hepatitis B patients receiving lamivudine therapy. It is generally believed to be a benevolent sign, implicating clearance of viremia. The aim of this study is to examine the authenticity of this dogma. METHODS: In a 5-year period, 11 patients treated with lamivudine experienced seroclearance of HBsAg. The clinical data were examined. The HBV S gene sequences derived from the patient's serum samples before and after seroclearance of HBsAg were analyzed. RESULTS: Serum HBV-DNA could be detected by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in all 11 patients, by 1-step PCR in 8, and by Cobas Amplicor HBV-DNA test (>200 copies/mL) in 5. A mutation hot spot, P120A in the S gene, was identified in 6 of the 11 patients. Site-directed mutagenesis experiments indicated that the Ausria-II RIA test failed to detect this mutant. Decreased sensitivity of detection was also observed when other monoclonal antibodies were applied. CONCLUSIONS: Seroclearance of HBsAg during lamivudine therapy may not indicate viral clearance. Specifically, it may be caused by a point mutation in the S gene, which results in detection failure. In such patients, further verification and follow-up using a sensitive HBV-DNA test are advised.     

Virological differences between patients infected with subtypes Ba and Bj of hepatitis B virus genotype B

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype B is classified into subtype Ba with the recombination with genotype C in the precore region plus core gene and subtype Bj without recombination. Virological and clinical differences between infections with subtypes Ba and Bj, however, are yet to be determined. METHODS: During 1976 through 2001, 224 patients visited Toranomon Hospital in Tokyo, Japan who were infected with HBV genotype B. Subtypes of genotype B were determined by sequencing HBV-DNA recovered from sera for detecting recombination with genotype C. RESULTS: Subtype Ba was detected in 53 patients (24%) and Bj in 167 (75%); subtypes were not able to be determined in the remaining four (1%). The only virological difference was that detection of hepatitis B e antigen at the presentation was more frequent in the patients infected with subtype Ba than those with Bj (63% vs 33%, P = 0.016). There were no differences in the distribution of liver disease of various forms between the patients infected with subtypes Ba and Bj at presentation. No differences were noted, either, in the development of liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma, or the loss of hepatitis B surface antigen from serum, between the patients infected with subtypes Ba and Bj during follow up of up to 26 years. CONCLUSIONS: Although there were some virological differences between the patients infected with subtypes Ba and Bj of HBV genotype B, they do not seem to influence the long-term clinical outcome.     

Changes in levels of hepatitis B virus markers in patients positive for low-titer hepatitis B surface antigen

Aim: Recently, patients positive for the low-titer hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) have been found occasionally owing to the increase in the accuracy of detection methods. The aim of this study is to clarify the clinical status of acute hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in patients positive for low-titer HBsAg. Method: Eight patients, who were positive for HBsAg at low titers and diagnosed as having acute HBV infection, were enrolled in this study. Assays of HBsAg, hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc), hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg), hepatitis B e-antibody (anti-HBe), hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) and HBV DNA, and biochemical tests were basically conducted every 4 weeks for at least 24 weeks. Result: The average cut-off index of HBsAg was 8.7 ± 9.6 (range, 1.0–25.7). All the patients were negative for anti-HBc, HBeAg, anti-HBe and HBV DNA on their initial visit. The genotype of HBV could be determined in four patients: two were infected with genotype B/HBV, one was infected with genotype A/HBV, and the remaining patient was infected with genotype C/HBV. Although HBsAg clearance was observed within 4 months in all the patients, none of the other HBV markers seroconverted during the observation period. Conclusion: HBV infection terminating with seronegativity for HBV markers may occur in transient HBV infection.     

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B

SUMMARY. Chronic infection with the hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a major cause of worldwide morbidity and mortality. A large number of therapeutic approaches has been tried, including interferon (IFN), nucleoside analogues and immunomodulators. To date controlled clinical trials have shown that only IFN is of long-term value but many patients fail to respond to treatment. New approaches to treating patients with IFN-resistant hepatitis B are currently undergoing clinical and experimental evaluation, and it seems likely that new therapeutic agents will be available in the near future.     

HBV持续感染及其机制的研究进展

HBV属嗜肝DNA病毒科,可引起人类急性和慢性肝炎,甚至肝硬化、肝癌。目前的抗病毒药物因不能彻底清除肝细胞内HBV,故很难达到治愈的效果。近年来,HBV持续感染的机制受到广泛关注,主要涉及宿主与病毒两方面,从病毒方面展开,主要阐述了cccDNA、HBV颗粒和HBV自身组分维持HBV持续感染的相关研究进展。     

Detection of HBV core promoter and precore mutations helps distinguish flares of chronic hepatitis from acute hepatitis B

Background and Aim: Acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B has to be distinguished from acute hepatitis, because treatment strategies differ between them. Methods: Mutations in the core promoter and precore region of hepatitis B virus (HBV) were determined in 36 patients with acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B, in whom alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increased above 500 IU/L, as well as the 36 patients with acute hepatitis. Results: Mutations in the core promoter (A1762T/G1764A) and precore region (G1896A) were more frequent in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis than acute hepatitis (81% vs 19%; P < 0.0001 and 58% vs 6%; P < 0.0001, respectively). Of the 19 patients with mutations in both the core promoter and precore region, 17 (89%) had acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis. In contrast, among the 32 patients with the wild‐type for both the core promoter and precore region, 29 (89%) developed acute hepatitis. By multivariate analysis, the double mutation in the core promoter was predictive of acute exacerbation in chronic hepatitis with the highest odds ratio at 26.4. Conclusions: In patients with hepatitis B having ALT levels >500 IU/L, mutations in the core promoter and precore region are useful in distinguishing acute exacerbation of chronic from acute HBV infection. Detection of these mutations would be useful for commencing prompt antiviral treatments on patients with acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis for a better prognosis.     

Analysis of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) using high‐sensitivity HBsAg assays in hepatitis B virus carriers in whom HBsAg seroclearance was confirmed by conventional assays

Aim

We investigated the utility of high‐sensitivity hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) assays compared with conventional HBsAg assays.

Methods

Using serum samples from 114 hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers in whom HBsAg seroclearance was confirmed by conventional HBsAg assays (cut‐off value, 0.05 IU/mL), the amount of HBsAg was re‐examined by high‐sensitivity HBsAg assays (cut‐off value, 0.005 IU/mL). Cases negative for HBsAg in both assays were defined as consistent cases, and cases positive for HBsAg in the high‐sensitivity HBsAg assay only were defined as discrepant cases.

Results

There were 55 (48.2%) discrepant cases, and the range of HBsAg titers determined by high‐sensitivity HBsAg assays was 0.005–0.056 IU/mL. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of nucleos(t)ide analog therapy, liver cirrhosis, and negative anti‐HBs contributed to the discrepancies between the two assays. Cumulative anti‐HBs positivity rates among discrepant cases were 12.7%, 17.2%, 38.8%, and 43.9% at baseline, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years, respectively, whereas the corresponding rates among consistent cases were 50.8%, 56.0%, 61.7%, and 68.0%, respectively. Hepatitis B virus DNA negativity rates were 56.4% and 81.4% at baseline, 51.3% and 83.3% at 1 year, and 36.8% and 95.7% at 3 years, among discrepant and consistent cases, respectively. Hepatitis B surface antigen reversion was observed only in discrepant cases.

Conclusions

Re‐examination by high‐sensitivity HBsAg assays revealed that HBsAg was positive in approximately 50% of cases. Cumulative anti‐HBs seroconversion rates and HBV‐DNA seroclearance rates were lower in these cases, suggesting a population at risk for HBsAg reversion.     

Spatial and chronological differences in hepatitis B virus genotypes from patients with acute hepatitis B in Japan

Genotypes of hepatitis B virus (HBV) were determined in 485 patients with acute hepatitis B from all over Japan. They were A in 92 (19%), Ba in 26 (5%), Bj in 32 (7%), C in 330 (68%) and D in 5 (1%). Sexual contacts were the main route of transmission in them. Overall, HBV persisted in only 5 of the 464 (1%) followed patients. Genotypes C accounted for more than 68% in northern as well as southern areas, contrasting with genotype A accounting for 34% in and around the Metropolitan areas. During 24 years from 1982 to 2005, genotype A increased from 5% to 33%, while genotype B gradually decreased from 26% to 8%. Fulminant hepatitis was significantly more frequent in infection with genotype Bj (41%) than those with the other genotypes (p < 0.01). The core-promoter double mutation (T1762/A1764) and precore stop-codon mutation (A1896) were more frequent in patients with fulminant than acute self-limited hepatitis (57% versus 15% and 58% versus 10%, respectively, p < 0.01 for both). In conclusion, genotype A distributes unevenly over Japan, prevails in younger patients through sexual transmission and has increased with years. Furthermore, fulminant outcome was more frequent in patients with genotype Bj than those with the other genotypes.     

Kinetics and risk of de novo hepatitis B infection in HBsAg-negative patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy

BACKGROUND & AIMS: De novo hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatitis after chemotherapy results in high morbidity and mortality. We evaluate the clinical course of de novo HBV-related hepatitis after chemotherapy. METHODS: Two hundred forty-four consecutive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative lymphoma patients treated with chemotherapy were followed up for a median of 12.4 (range, 0.1-65.0) months. Serially collected serum samples were analyzed for hepatitis, serum HBV DNA, and HBsAg seroreversion. RESULTS: Eight of the 244 patients (3.3%) developed de novo HBV-related hepatitis. A 100-fold increase in serum HBV DNA preceded de novo HBV-related hepatitis by a median of 18.5 (range, 12-28) weeks. All 8 patients had normal serum alanine aminotransaminase level when the 100-fold increase in serum HBV DNA occurred. Patients with de novo HBV-related hepatitis were more likely to have occult HBV infection before chemotherapy. Direct sequencing results showed that these 8 patients had de novo HBV-related hepatitis from reactivation of occult HBV infection. Three of the 8 patients with de novo HBV-related hepatitis compared with 6 of the 236 patients without de novo HBV-related hepatitis developed fulminant hepatic failure (37.5% vs 2.5%, respectively, P < .001). On multivariate Cox analysis, de novo HBV-related hepatitis was independently associated with a higher risk of fulminant hepatic failure (relative risk, 29.854; 95% confidence interval: 4.844-183.980; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Close surveillance for a 100-fold increase in HBV DNA is recommended for HBsAg-negative patients treated with chemotherapy so that early commencement of antiviral therapy can be initiated before the occurrence of de novo HBV-related hepatitis.     

Progressive and sufficient decrease of hepatitis B core antibody can predict the disappearance of hepatitis B virus DNA in Japanese patients with hepatitis B surface antigen clearance

The aim of this study was to elucidate the relationships among serum levels of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA, periods after hepatitis B surface (HBs) antigen clearance, and the titer of hepatitis B core (HBc) antibody in 200-fold diluted serum. Twelve patients who had clearance of HBs antigen from serum were studied. Five patients had not received any treatment (group A), and seven had received prednisolone withdrawal therapy. The patients in groups A and B were followed up for 86 months and 108 months (median), respectively. Serum HBV was measured by the nested polymerase chain reaction method. In both groups, serum HBV tended to become gradually undetectable after HBs antigen clearance. The positive rate of HBV in the sera 5 years or more after HBs antigen clearance was significantly lower than that in the sera at less than 5 years, both in group A (P = 0.004) and group B (P = 0.010). In both groups, the titer of HBs tended to decline every year after HBs antigen clearance. HBV was still detectable in the sera of some patients for a long period of time after they showed seroconversion to HBs antibody. The results suggest that detection of HBV was difficult in sera with an HBc titer of 30% or lower and at more than 5 years after HBs antigen clearance in both groups. It is important to note that HBV DNA rarely exists in the serum, even when HBs antigen and HBc are both negative. Received: November 22, 1999 / Accepted: April 28, 2000     

唐山地区乙肝患者HBsAg滴度、HBV DNA水平与乙肝基因突变位点的关系研究

目的:研究唐山地区乙型肝炎(乙肝)患者乙肝表面抗原(HBsAg)滴度、乙肝病毒基因(HBV DNA)水平与乙肝基因突变位点的关系。方法:选择2018年1月—2020年12月唐山地区150例乙肝患者作为研究对象,测定HBsAg滴度和血清HBV DNA水平,通过基因测序分析突变情况,并据此分为突变组与未突变组,比较不同基因突变位点患者的HBsAg滴度、HBV DNA水平,使用线性回归分析唐山地区乙肝患者HBsAg滴度、HBV DNA水平与乙肝基因突变位点的关系。结果:本研究150例乙肝患者中,有62例患者发生了基因突变,基因突变发生率为41.33%(62/150)。其中,rtM204I/V位点基因突变占比最高,为27.42%(17/62),rtL180M次之,为22.58%(14/62);rtL180M+rtM204I/V、rtA181T+rtN236T基因突变患者HBsAg滴度、HBV DNA水平高于rtM204I/V、rtL180M、rtN236T基因突变患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);经Pearson相关性分析结果显示,基因突变乙肝患者HBsAg滴度、HBV DNA水平...     

Natural history of chronic hepatitis B REVEALed

Chronic hepatitis B is a worldwide public health challenge. Knowledge of natural history of chronic hepatitis B is important for the management of the disease. A community-based prospective cohort study was carried out to evaluate the risk predictors of progression of chronic hepatitis B in Taiwan. A total of 23,820 participants were enrolled in 1991-1992 from seven townships in Taiwan. Their serum samples were collected at study entry and tested for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and e antigen (HBeAg), antibodies against hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and α-fetoprotein (AFP). A subcohort of 3653 male and female participants who were seropositive for HBsAg and seronegative for anti-HCV was included in the Risk Evaluation of Viral Load Elevation and Associated Liver Disease/Cancer-Hepatitis B Virus (REVEAL-HBV) study. Newly developed cases of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were ascertained through follow-up examination and data linkage with profiles of the National Cancer Registry, National Health Insurance Database and Death Certification System. The incidence of both HCC and cirrhosis were significantly associated with serum HBV DNA levels in a dose-response relationship from <300 (undetectable) to ≥1,000,000 copies/mL. The biological gradients remained significant (P<0.001) after adjustment for age, sex, habits of cigarette smoking and alcohol drinking, HBeAg serostatus, and serum ALT level at cohort entry. A significant association with risk of cirrhosis and HCC was also observed for HBV genotype, precore G1896A mutant and basal core promoter A1762T/G1764A double mutant. Nomograms have been developed for the long-term risk prediction of cirrhosis and HCC for patients with chronic hepatitis B. Inactive carriers of HBV have an increased HCC incidence and liver-related mortality than HBsAg-seronegative controls. Serum HBV DNA level at study entry is a major predictor of spontaneous seroclearance of HBeAg, HBV DNA and HBsAg. These findings may inform the effective and efficient management of chronic hepatitis B.     

Comparison between quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen,hepatitis B e‐antigen and hepatitis B virus DNA levels for predicting virological response to pegylated interferon‐α‐2b therapy in hepatitis B e‐antigen‐positive chronic hepatitis B

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical applicability of quantitative serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B e‐antigen (HBeAg) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA for predicting virological response (VR) to pegylated interferon (PEG‐IFN) therapy. Methods: Thirty HBeAg‐positive chronic hepatitis B patients who received PEG‐IFN‐α‐2b for 48 weeks were enrolled. Quantitative HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV DNA were measured before, during and after the therapy. Paired liver biopsies were performed before and after treatment for covalently closed circular (ccc)DNA and intrahepatic HBV DNA analysis. Results: VR at 48 weeks post‐treatment, defined as HBeAg seroconversion and HBV DNA less than 10 000 copies/mL was achieved in 10 (33.3%) patients. Responders had significantly lower baseline HBsAg, HBeAg, cccDNA and intrahepatic HBV DNA levels than non‐responders. Baseline and reduced levels of log₁₀ HBsAg and log₁₀ HBeAg correlated well with those of log₁₀ cccDNA and log₁₀ total intrahepatic HBV DNA. Responders showed consistent decrease in serum HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV DNA levels during therapy. HBeAg level of 2.0 log₁₀ sample to cut‐off ratio at week 24 on therapy provided the best prediction of sustained virological response, with sensitivity and negative predictive values of 85% and 92%, respectively. One patient (3.3%) who cleared HBsAg at follow up exhibited a more rapid decline in serum HBsAg during therapy than those who developed VR without HBsAg clearance. Conclusion: Quantitative measurement of serum HBeAg during therapy may be superior to serum HBsAg and HBV DNA as a prediction of HBeAg seroconversion. Kinetics of HBsAg levels on therapy may help predict HBsAg clearance after treatment.     

Switching to peginterferon for chronic hepatitis B patients with hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion on entecavir – A prospective study

Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) are effective in suppressing hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication, but most patients require long‐term treatment. This study aimed to investigate switching to peginterferon as a strategy to stop NA. Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)‐positive chronic hepatitis B patients who developed HBeAg seroconversion during NA treatment were studied. All patients received open‐label peginterferon alfa‐2a 180 μg/wk for 48 weeks, and NA was stopped at week 4 of peginterferon treatment. The primary endpoint was sustained response, which was defined as negative HBeAg, positive anti‐HBe and HBV DNA <2000 IU/mL at week 72. Other secondary endpoints including HBsAg loss at week 72 were also studied. Forty‐one patients treated with entecavir for 56 ± 23 months were recruited. Sustained response was achieved in 30 patients (73%, 95% confidence interval 58%‐84%). At week 72, 31 (76%) patients had HBeAg seroconversion, 56 (23%) patients had undetectable HBV DNA, 31 (76%) patients had normal ALT, and 6 patients (15%) had HBsAg loss. Baseline HBsAg level was the best predictor for both sustained response and HBsAg loss; the best HBsAg cut‐off for sustained response was <1500 IU/mL and that for HBsAg loss was <500 IU/mL by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Twenty‐two of 25 (88%) patients with baseline HBsAg <1500 IU/mL had sustained response. Five of 10 (50%) patients with baseline HBsAg <500 IU/mL developed HBsAg loss. Switching to peginterferon can be considered as a treatment option in NA‐treated patients with HBeAg seroconversion, particularly among those with lower HBsAg levels.     

HBsAg-negative hepatitis B virus infections in hepatitis C virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma

This study was conducted to evaluate reports that hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA sequences can be found in the serum and/or tumour tissue from some hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who have no detectable hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in their sera. Such HBV infections would be highly atypical, because prospective studies have shown a clear succession of specific serologic markers during and after most HBV infections. As most HBsAg-negative HCC patients in Japan have hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections, the present study was conducted to determine whether some of these patients actually have unrecognized HBV infections. Thirty newly diagnosed HCC patients from Kurume, Japan, with antibody to the hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) were studied. None of the 30 had HBsAg detectable in their serum. Of 22 for whom test results for antibodies to the hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) and antibodies to HBsAg (anti-HBs) were available, 14 (64%) had anti-HBc and anti-HBs, four (18%) had anti-HBc alone, and four (18%) had no HBV markers. Nested polymerase chain reaction was used to detect the HBV surface (S), core (C), polymerase (P) and core promoter gene sequences in the HCC tissues and in the adjacent nontumorous liver tissues. HBV DNA was detected in HCC and/or adjacent nontumorous liver in 22 of 30 (73%) patients [detected in both HCC and nontumorous liver in 19/30 patients (63%)]. Among the 22 patients with detectable HBV DNA, more than one HBV gene was detected in 10 (46%). Among the four patients whose sera were negative for all HBV markers, three had HBV DNA in either HCC and nontumorous liver (two cases) or only in the nontumorous liver (one case); HBV DNA could not be detected in tissues from the fourth patient. In 18 of 21 (86%) patients with detectable HBV core promoter sequences, mutations at both nucleotides 1762 (A-GT) and 1764 (G-A) in the core promoter region were found. No deletions were detected in the core promoter gene region of the type reported to be associated with some cases of HBsAg-negative HBV infection. Thus, HBV DNA was detectable in 22 (73%) HBsAg-negative, anti-HCV-positive HCCs, including three (10%) who were also negative for anti-HBc and anti-HBs. HBV mutations at both nucleotides 1762 (A-GT) and 1764 (G-A) in the core promoter region were found in the majority of cases, mutations that have previously been reported in HBV that is integrated in HCC DNA. In serologic surveys to determine etiologic associations of HCC, patients such as those in this study would have been incorrectly designated as having 'HCV-associated HCC,' whereas the data in this study suggest that HBV could have played a role in the development of their HCCs.