Clofarabine,idarubicin, and cytarabine (CIA) as frontline therapy for patients ≤60 years with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia

Clofarabine is a second generation nucleoside analogue with activity in adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A phase I trial of clofarabine, idarubicin, and cytarabine (CIA) in relapsed and refractory AML had shown an overall response rate (ORR) of 48%. To explore this combination further, we conducted a phase II study of (CIA) in patients with newly diagnosed AML ≤60 years. Patients ≥18–60 years with AML and adequate organ function were enrolled. Induction therapy consisted of clofarabine (C) 20 mg m^?2 IV daily (days 1–5), idarubicin (I) 10 mg m^?2 IV daily (days 1–3), and cytarabine (A) 1 g m^?2 IV daily (days 1–5). Patients in remission received up to six consolidation cycles (C 15 mg m^?2 × 3, I 8 mg m^?2 × 2, and A 0.75 g m^?2 × 3). Fifty‐seven patients were evaluable. ORR was 79%. With a median follow up of 10.9 months, the median overall survival (OS) was not reached, the median event‐free survival (EFS) was 13.5 months. Most toxicities were ≤grade 2. Four week mortality was 2%. In subgroup analysis, patients ≤40 years had better OS (P = 0.04) and EFS (P = 0.04) compared to patients >40 years. Compared to historical patients treated with idarubicin and cyarabine (IA), the OS and EFS were significantly longer for CIA treated patients. In multivariate analysis, CIA retained its favorable impact on OS compared to IA. Thus, CIA is an effective and safe therapy for patients ≤60 years with newly diagnosed AML. Am. J. Heamtol. 88:961–966, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

标准剂量去甲氧柔红霉素联合阿糖胞苷治疗急性髓细胞白血病

目的:探讨标准剂量的去甲氧柔红霉素(IDA)联合阿糖胞苷(Ara-C)治疗急性髓细胞白血病(AML)的疗效和不良反应。方法:14例AML患者,年龄13～70岁(中位年龄36岁),男8例,女6例。初治AML10例,难治、复发AML4例。所有患者均在治疗前进行染色体核型分析,4例染色体异常。诱导方案为IDA 12 mg·m-2·d-1,第1～3天,Ara-C 100 mg·m-2·d-1,持续静脉点滴,第1～7天。结果:1个疗程结束后总有效率92．9％(13／14),完全缓解率85．7％(12／14),其中初治AML的CR率为90．0％(9／10),复发、难治AML的CR率为75．0％(3／4),3例染色体异常患者达细胞遗传学缓解,未发生早期死亡。化疗的不良反应主要为骨髓抑制和粒细胞缺乏所致感染,未见严重的非造血系统不良反应。结论:标准剂量的IDA联合Ara-C 24 h持续静脉点滴,为初治、复发难治AML的高效、安全的方案。     

Efficacy and feasibility of cyclophosphamide combined with intermediate- dose or high-dose cytarabine for relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML)

Background

Approximately, 70 % of adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) achieve a complete remission (CR) while 10–20 % of AML are refractory to induction chemotherapy. Furthermore, a significant proportion of AML patients in CR will relapse during or after consolidation treatment. There is no evidence for a standard salvage regimen and most centers use a combination of an anthracycline and cytarabine (AraC). The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of two age-adjusted regimens containing AraC and cyclophosphamide applied for the treatment of relapsed or refractory AML.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively analyzed 60 patients (24 male, 36 female; median age 56 years) with relapsed or refractory AML who were treated with a combination of AraC and cyclophosphamide monocentrically between October 2000 and January 2013. Two different protocols containing either high-dose (hAC) or intermediate-dose cytarabin (iAC) have been applied dependent on age and performance status.

Results

We demonstrate an overall response rate (CR + PR) induced by hAC and iAC of 56.7 %. Importantly, a complete remission rate (CR + CRp) of 52.2 % was found in patients who received the hAC regimen while only 8.8 % of patients achieved a CR following the iAC protocol (p < 0.001). The rate of refractory disease was 26.1 and 47.1 %, respectively. High-risk cytogenetics, i.e., a complex aberrant or monosomal karyotype had no effect on achievement of CR after hAC. In addition, there was no impact of activating FLT3 mutations on response to treatment according to the hAC regimen. In the cohort of patients treated with the iAC protocol, treatment-related mortality of 11.8 % within 60 days was observed but none of the patients who received the hAC regimen died within the first 2 months following chemotherapy. The toxicity profile was acceptable at both cytarabine dose levels. Importantly, 19 patients (82.6 %) of the hAC cohort underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) as consecutive treatment.

Conclusion

The hAC regimen represents a promising therapeutic approach to induce a second CR in younger patients with relapsed or refractory AML prior to HSCT without using anthracyclines.     

Treatment strategies in acute myeloid leukemia (AML)

Summary The strategy for treatment of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia must primarily be based on the patient's age and clinical condition as well as on the stage of the disease. Accordingly, the general decision between an intensive approach including high-dose chemotherapy or possibly immediate allogeneic bone marrow transplantation versus less-aggressive palliative treatment will precede the selection of the most appropriate salvage regimen. In patients qualifying for intensive second-line chemotherapy the duration of the first remission and the number of relapses provide the means to discriminate between refractoriness or maintained responsiveness to conventional protocols. More than 50% of patients with first relapses after 6–12 months remission duration will respond to standard therapy again and should therefore not be entered on investigational agents with unproven antileukemic activity. The latter seems deeply warranted, on the other hand, for early relapses, second recurrences and resistant first relapses with a remission rate of less than 30% after conventional regimens. These guidelines not only provide an objective rationale for selecting the most appropriate strategy at relapse in individual patients. Furthermore, they facilitate interstudy comparisons and a better judgement of different treatment protocols.     

Treatment strategies in acute myeloid leukemia (AML)

Summary Chemotherapy remains the backbone of treatment in AML. Of all adult patients 65% go into remission and have a chance of longer survival and of even being cured. Among the responders, 25% can be cured by intensive and long-term chemotherapy. Since the effect of chemotherapy appears not to be limited to a special period of time, its antileukemic and curative potential could be further exploited by multiple-step chemotherapy combining double induction, intensified consolidation and long-term maintenance. Improved antimicrobial treatment and the use of hematopoietic growth factors may help making multiple-step chemotherapy practicable, thereby increasing the cure rate in AML.The studies of the AML Cooperative Group (AMLCG) are supported by grants OIZP 0123 and 8701 of the Ministry of Research and Technology of the Federal Republic of GermanyDedicated to Professor Dr. Drs. h.c. Franz Büchner on his 95th birthday     

Genetic classification of acute myeloid leukemia (AML)

In 50-60% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) acquired clonal chromosome aberrations can be observed after metaphase banding analyses. The cytogenetic results at diagnosis provide the most single important parameter for determining prognosis so far. Numerous recurrent karyotype abnormalities have been described in AML. These findings on the chromosomal level were followed and supplied by molecular studies that have identified genes involved in leukemogenesis. Even more, molecular markers such as MLL partial tandem duplications (MLL-PTD) or FLT3 length mutations (FLT3-LM) were found to characterize specific subtypes of AML and completed the genetic marker profile. The identification of specific chromosomal abnormalities or molecular markers and their correlation with cytomorphological features, immunophenotype as well as clinical outcome led to a new understanding of AML as a heterogeneous group of distinct biological entities. The importance of cytogenetic and molecular genetic findings in AML for classification and for the understanding of pathogenetic mechanisms is increasingly appreciated in clinical context and was translated also into the new WHO-classification of AML that uses cytogenetic abnormalities as a major criterion.     

A randomized study of clofarabine versus clofarabine plus low-dose cytarabine as front-line therapy for patients aged 60 years and older with acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome

We previously reported the feasibility of clofarabine and cytarabine combinations in AML. Questions remain as to (1) the therapeutic advantage of this combination and (2) the role of lower doses of clofarabine and cytarabine in older patients. We have conducted an adaptively randomized study of lower-dose clofarabine with or without low-dose cytarabine in previously untreated patients with AML aged 60 years and older. Patients received 30 mg/m(2) clofarabine intravenously daily for 5 days with or without 20 mg/m(2) cytarabine subcutaneously daily for 14 days as induction. Consolidation consisted of 3 days of clofarabine with or without 7 days of cytarabine. Seventy patients were enrolled. The median age was 71 years (range, 60-83 years). Sixteen patients received clofarabine and 54 the combination. Overall, 56% achieved complete remission (CR). CR rate was significantly higher with the combination (63% vs 31%; P = .025). Induction mortality was 19% with the combination versus 31% with clofarabine alone (P = .276). The combination showed better event-free survival (7.1 months vs 1.7 months; P = .04), but not overall survival (11.4 months vs 5.8 months; P = .1). Clofarabine plus low-dose cytarabine has a higher response rate than clofarabine alone with comparable toxicity. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as no. NCT00088218.     

Fludarabine,cytarabine, and attenuated‐dose idarubicin (m‐FLAI) combination therapy for elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients

We performed a phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the modified fludarabine, cytarabine, and attenuated‐dose idarubicin (m‐FLAI) regimen in elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. Elderly (≥60 years) AML patients who had not previously received chemotherapy were enrolled in the study. Patients received two consecutive cycles of m‐FLAI chemotherapy as an induction. The m‐FLAI regimen comprised fludarabine (25 mg/m², days 1–4), cytarabine (1,000 mg/m², days 1–4), and attenuated‐dose idarubicin (5 mg/m², days 1–3). The primary end point was complete remission (CR) rate. Secondary end points were overall survival (OS), event‐free survival (EFS), and treatment‐related mortality (TRM). There were 108 patients (median age 68.4 years, M:F = 64:44) enrolled in the study. CR was achieved in 56.5% of patients, and the TRM rate was 21.3%. Median OS and median EFS were 10.2 and 6.6 months, respectively. The mortality at 30 and 60 days was 15 and 21%, respectively. Performance status and comorbidity did not have prognostic value in this patient cohort. Bone marrow expression of CD117 was associated with increased EFS and OS. m‐FLAI is an effective induction regimen for previously untreated AML in elderly patients. In addition, bone‐marrow CD117 expression is an independent favorable prognostic factor in elderly AML patients. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01247493). Am. J. Hematol. 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Postremission therapy in older patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: a randomized trial comparing mitoxantrone and intermediate-dose cytarabine with standard-dose cytarabine

The treatment of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains unsatisfactory, with complete remission (CR) achieved in only approximately 50% and long-term disease-free survival in 10% to 20%. Three hundred eighty-eight patients (60 years of age and older) with newly diagnosed de novo AML were randomly assigned to receive placebo (P) or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) or GM in a double-blind manner, beginning 1 day after the completion of 3 days of daunorubicin and 7 days of cytarabine therapy. No differences were found in the rates of leukemic regrowth, CR, or infectious complications in either arm. Of 205 patients who achieved CR, 169 were medically well and were randomized to receive cytarabine alone or a combination of cytarabine and mitoxantrone. With a median follow-up of 7.7 years, the median disease-free survival times were 11 months and 10 months for those randomized to cytarabine or cytarabine/mitoxantrone, respectively. Rates of relapse, excluding deaths in CR, were 77% for cytarabine and 82% for cytarabine/mitoxantrone. Induction randomization had no effect on leukemic relapse rate or remission duration in either postremission arm. Because cytarabine/mitoxantrone was more toxic and no more effective than cytarabine, it was concluded that this higher-dose therapy had no benefit in the postremission management of older patients with de novo AML. These results suggest the need to develop novel therapeutic strategies for these patients. (Blood. 2001;98:548-553)     

Mosaic Down syndrome-associated acute myeloid leukemia does not require high-dose cytarabine treatment for induction and consolidation therapy

The present study aimed to identify optimal treatment intensity in children with mosaic Down syndrome (DS) and acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (AMKL). A retrospective review of AMKL patients was undertaken to identify mosaic DS children. Between November 1992 and November 2007, seven children were diagnosed as mosaic DS and AMKL. The median age at diagnosis was 29 months (range 4–34 months). Three patients had a past history of transient abnormal myelopoiesis. UPN1–4 were treated with intermediate-dose cytarabine and UPN4 received additional one course of high-dose cytarabine. All of these patients were remained in first CR. UPN5–7 were treated with high-dose cytarabine according to the AML99 protocol. UPN5 with GATA1 mutation suffered from acute pneumonia and pancreatitis and discontinued chemotherapy. UPN7 relapsed after cessation of chemotherapy and was rescued with allo-PBSCT. The cumulative doses of cytarabine were 3.5–10.65 g/m² in the UPN1–4 and 40.4–78.4 g/m² in the UPN5–7. The 8-year overall survival was 100% and the 8-year event-free survival 85.7%, respectively. Our retrospective study reveals that patients with mosaic DS and AMKL have a good prognosis. Reduction in intensity may work in patients with mosaic DS as well as with AML-DS.     

Efficacy of the hypomethylating agents as frontline, salvage, or consolidation therapy in adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML)

The hypomethylating agents (HAs), azacitidine and decitabine, have emerged as an alternative to initial and salvage therapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Little is known about how AML responds to hypomethylating agents after standard therapy, and the activity of these agents in a real-world setting is not well studied. We retrospectively examined data for 75 consecutive AML patients at Wake Forest from 2002 to 2011 treated with HAs either as first-line (n?=?34), salvage (n?=?28), or consolidation (n?=?13) therapy. We collected data on age, gender, race, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), cytogenetics, type of treatment, complete remission (CR), complete remission with incomplete count recovery (CRi), and survival. Statistical analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models. Frontline response rate (CR + CRi) was 26.5 %, and median overall survival (OS) was 3.4 months (95 % CI 1.3–7.4), with 18 % alive at 1 year. In the salvage cohort, the response rate was significantly lower compared to frontline (3.6 versus 26.5 %, p?=?0.017). Despite the reduced response, OS from time of HA treatment was longer than frontline at 8.2 months (CI 4.8–10.3). In the consolidation cohort, OS was 13.8 months (CI 8.0–21.6) with one patient in remission more than 30 months from diagnosis. These data suggest that prior cytotoxic therapy decreases marrow response rates to HAs but not survival. Furthermore, use of hypomethylating agents for consolidation resulted in a median overall survival over 1 year in a cohort of older patients. This suggests that hypomethylating agents have activity in all phases of AML treatment.     

Idarubicin,cytarabine, and pravastatin as induction therapy for untreated acute myeloid leukemia and high‐risk myelodysplastic syndrome

Previous studies suggest that idarubicin/cytarabine(ara‐C)/pravastatin (IAP) is an active salvage regimen for patients with AML. We therefore investigated this regimen in patients with newly‐diagnosed AML or MDS (≥10% blasts). Patients were eligible if the anticipated treatment‐related mortality (TRM) was <10%. Patients received pravastatin (1,280 mg/day po; days 1–8), cytarabine (1.5 g/m²/day; days 4–7), and idarubicin (12 mg/m²/day, days 4–6). Up to 3 cycles of consolidation with a shortened course was permitted. The primary endpoints were “good CR” rate (CR on day 35 without minimal residual disease) and TRM in the first 28 days. The study was to stop if after each cohort of 5 patients (a) the Bayesian posterior probability was < 5% that the true “good CR rate” was ≥ 70% or (b) the posterior probability was >25% that the TRM rate was ≥5%. Twenty‐four patients were included. Conventional CR was achieved in 15 (63%) patients but only 12 (50%) achieved “good CR”. 4 of 12 (33%) patients with “good CR” relapsed at median of 16 weeks (10.5–19). Five (21%) patients had refractory disease. Survival probability at 1 year was 72% (48.7–64). Two (8.3%) patients died within 28 days from multiorgan failure. The most common grade 3–4 adverse effects were febrile neutropenia (75%) and diarrhea (25%). Based on the stopping rules accrual ceased after entry of these 24 patients. IAP did not meet the predefined efficacy criteria for success. Therefore, we would not recommend this regimen for phase three testing in this patient subset. Am. J. Hematol. 90:483–486, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Salvage therapy with high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone in combination with all-trans retinoic acid and gemtuzumab ozogamicin in acute myeloid leukemia refractory to first induction therapy

Outcome of patients with primary refractory acute myeloid leukemia remains unsatisfactory. We conducted a prospective phase II clinical trial with gemtuzumab ozogamicin (3 mg/m² intravenously on day 1), all-trans retinoic acid (45 mg/m² orally on days 4–6 and 15 mg/m² orally on days 7–28), high-dose cytarabine (3 g/m²/12 h intravenously on days 1–3) and mitoxantrone (12 mg/m² intravenously on days 2–3) in 93 patients aged 18–60 years refractory to one cycle of induction therapy. Primary end point of the study was response to therapy; secondary end points included evaluation of toxicities, in particular, rate of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Complete remission or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery was achieved in 47 (51%) and partial remission in 10 (11%) patients resulting in an overall response rate of 61.5%; 33 (35.5%) patients had refractory disease and 3 patients (3%) died. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation was performed in 71 (76%) patients; 6 of the 71 (8.5%) patients developed moderate or severe sinusoidal obstruction syndrome after transplantation. Four-year overall survival rate was 32% (95% confidence interval 24%-43%). Patients responding to salvage therapy and undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (n=51) had a 4-year survival rate of 49% (95% confidence intervaI 37%-64%). Patients with fms-like tyrosine kinase internal tandem duplication positive acute myeloid leukemia had a poor outcome despite transplantation. In conclusion, the described regimen is an effective and tolerable salvage therapy for patients who are primary refractory to one cycle of conventional intensive induction therapy. (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 00143975)