MRI for the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia and viability

Assessment of myocardial ischemia and viability plays a crucial role in the clinical management of patients with coronary artery disease. Recently, cardiovascular MRI has emerged as an important noninvasive diagnostic modality in the assessment of coronary artery disease. MRI is able to evaluate both myocardial perfusion as well as myocardial contractile reserve. Because of its superior spatial resolution, integration of qualitative and quantitative methodology, and excellent reproducibility, MRI has advantages over conventional noninvasive modalities currently used in the evaluation of myocardial ischemia and viability, and may well emerge as the premier noninvasive technique in the assessment of patients with coronary artery disease. The authors review the rapidly expanding recent literature that has now established cardiovascular MRI (including dobutamine cine MRI and vasodilator perfusion MRI techniques) as an ideal choice in the evaluation of myocardial ischemia and delayed contrast-enhanced MRI and low-dose dobutamine cine MRI for evaluation of viability. Comparisons with more established techniques such as dobutamine stress echocardiography, single photon emission computed tomography perfusion imaging, and positron emission tomography are reviewed.     

Técnicas de imagen híbridas en cardiopatía isquémica

Hybrid imaging for ischemic heart disease refers to the fusion of information from a single or usually from multiple cardiovascular imaging modalities enabling synergistic assessment of the presence, the extent, and the severity of coronary atherosclerotic disease along with the hemodynamic significance of lesions and/or with evaluation of the myocardial function. A combination of coronary computed tomography angiography with myocardial perfusion imaging, such as single-photon emission computed tomography and positron emission tomography, has been adopted in several centers and implemented in international coronary artery disease management guidelines. Interest has increased in novel hybrid methods including coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve and computed tomography perfusion and these techniques hold promise for the imminent diagnostic and management approaches of patients with coronary artery disease. In this review, we discuss the currently available hybrid noninvasive imaging modalities used in clinical practice, research approaches, and exciting potential future technological developments.     

Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of coronary artery disease

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is gaining importance in cardiology as the noninvasive test of choice for patients with a multitude of cardiovascular problems. Recently, cardiovascular MRI has emerged as an important noninvasive diagnostic modality in the assessment of coronary artery disease. Because of its superior spatial resolution, integration of qualitative and quantitative methodology, and excellent reproducibility, MRI has advantages over conventional noninvasive modalities currently used in the evaluation of coronary artery disease. This article reviews the rapidly expanding recent literature that has now established cardiovascular MRI as an ideal choice in the evaluation of myocardial ischemia (including dobutamine cine MRI and vasodilator perfusion MRI techniques). We further discuss the role of delayed contrast-enhanced MRI and low-dose dobutamine cine MRI for evaluation of myocardial viability. Comparisons with more established techniques, such as dobutamine stress echocardiography, single-photon emission computed tomography perfusion imaging, and positron emission tomography, are reviewed.     

Comparison of various parameters for determining an index of myocardial perfusion reserve in detecting coronary stenosis with cardiovascular magnetic resonance tomography]

For the assessment of myocardial perfusion with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, different semiquantitative parameters of the first pass signal intensity time curves can be calculated and myocardial perfusion reserve indices can be determined. In this study we evaluated the feasibility of different perfusion parameters and their perfusion reserve indices for the detection of significant coronary artery stenosis. The signal intensity time curves of the first pass of a gadolinium-DTPA bolus injected via a central vein catheter before and after dipyridamole infusion were investigated in 15 patients with single vessel (stenosis > or = 75% area reduction) and five patients without significant coronary artery disease. For the distinction of ischemic and nonischemic myocardial segments, semiquantitative parameters, such as maximal signal intensity, contrast appearance time, time to maximal signal intensity and the steepness of the signal intensity curve's upslope determined by a linear fit, were assessed after correction for the input function. For each parameter a myocardial perfusion reserve index was calculated and cut off values for the detection of significant coronary stenosis were defined. The diagnostic accuracy of each parameter was then examined prospectively in 36 patients with coronary artery disease and compared with coronary angiography. Where as a distinction of ischemic and normal myocardium was possible with myocardial perfusion reserve indices, semiquantitative parameters at rest or after vasodilation alone did not allow such a distinction. The perfusion reserve index calculated from the upslope showed the most significant difference between ischemic and nonischemic myocardial segments (1.19 +/- 0.4 and 2.38 +/- 0.45, p < 0.001) followed by maximum signal intensity, time to maximum signal intensity and contrast apperance time. Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy was 87, 82 and 85% for the detection of hypoperfusion induced by significant coronary artery stenoses using the perfusion reserve index calculated from the upslope. The steepness of the first pass signal intensity curve's upslope, determined by a linear fit, is a feasible parameter for the detection of significant coronary artery disease with MR. Based on a myocardial perfusion reserve index of this parameter, ischemic myocardium can be identified with high diagnostic accuracy.     

Cardiac Imaging in the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease

Coronary artery disease (CAD) continues to be a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although invasive coronary angiography has previously been the gold standard in establishing the diagnosis of CAD, there is a growing shift to more appropriately use the cardiac catheterization laboratory to perform interventional procedures once a diagnosis of CAD has been established by noninvasive imaging modalities rather than using it primarily as a diagnostic facility to confirm or refute CAD. With ongoing technological advancements, noninvasive imaging plays a pre-eminent role in not only diagnosing CAD but also informing the choice of appropriate therapies, establishing prognosis, all while containing costs and providing value-based care. Multiple imaging modalities are available to evaluate patients suspected of having coronary ischemia, such as stress electrocardiography, stress echocardiography, single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging, positron emission tomography, coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography, and magnetic resonance imaging. These imaging modalities can variably provide functional and anatomical delineation of coronary stenoses and help guide appropriate therapy. This review will discuss their advantages and limitations and their usage in the diagnostic pathway for patients with CAD. We also discuss newer technologies such as CT fractional flow reserve, CT angiography with perfusion, whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography with perfusion, which can provide both anatomical as well as functional information in the same test, thus obviating the need for multiple diagnostic tests to obtain a comprehensive assessment of both, plaque burden and downstream ischemia. Recognizing that clinicians have a multitude of tests to choose from, we provide an underpinning of the principles of ischemia detection by these various modalities, focusing on anatomy vs physiology, the database justifying their use, their prognostic capabilities and lastly, their appropriate and judicious use in this era of patient-centered, cost-effective imaging.     

A myocardial perfusion reserve index in humans using first-pass contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI) derived from a quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique in normal human volunteers and patients with coronary artery disease and to relate MPRI to coronary artery stenosis severity measured with quantitative arteriography. BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging could be a useful noninvasive tool in the investigation of ischemic heart disease. However, there have been few studies in humans to quantify myocardial perfusion and myocardial perfusion reserve using MRI and none in patients with coronary disease. METHODS: Twenty patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease and five normal volunteers underwent both resting and stress (adenosine 140 microg/kg(-1)/min(-1)) first-pass contrast-enhanced MRI examinations (using 0.05 mmol/kg 1 of gadopentetate dimeglumine. Using a tracer kinetic model, the unidirectional transfer constant (K(i)), a perfusion marker for the myocardial uptake of contrast, was computed in each coronary arterial territory. The ratio of K(i) for the rest and stress scans was used to calculate the MPRI. Percent reduction in luminal diameter of coronary lesions was measured using an automated edge-detection algorithm. RESULTS: Myocardial perfusion reserve index was significantly reduced in patients compared with normal subjects (2.02+/-0.7 vs. 4.21+/-1.16, p < 0.02). For regions supplied by individual vessels, there was a significant negative correlation of MPRI with percent diameter stenosis (r = -0.81, p < 0.01). Importantly, regions supplied by vessels with <40% diameter stenosis (non-flow limiting) had a significantly higher MPRI than regions supplied by stenoses of "intermediate" severity, that is, >40% to 59% diameter stenosis (2.80+/-0.77 and 1.93+/-0.38, respectively, p < 0.02). However, even regions supplied by vessels with <40% diameter stenosis had a significantly lower MPRI than volunteers (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A myocardial perfusion reserve index derived from first-pass MRI studies can distinguish between normal subjects and patients with coronary artery disease. Furthermore, it provides useful functional information on coronary lesions, particularly where the physiologic significance cannot be predicted accurately from the angiogram.     

冠状动脉微循环障碍评估方法的研究进展

微血管性心绞痛(microvascular angina,MVA)是由于冠状动脉微循环血流失调引起心肌灌注减少造成的,是经常受到忽略的一种胸痛,阻塞性和非阻塞性的心外膜冠状动脉疾病均可存在。通过测定冠状动脉血流储备(coronary flow reserve,CFR),MVA可得到明确诊断。目前MVA的评估主要是通过有创的心导管检查,应用冠状动脉内多普勒导丝可以检测冠状动脉微循环的功能,但过程复杂、耗时,还会给患者带来一定的风险。最近,一种新的冠状动脉造影方法通过测定时间密度曲线以计算CFR是可行的,可替代冠状动脉内多普勒超声。然而,评估CFR的非侵入性检查技术也正在逐步发展,其中包括正电子放射断层扫描、MRI和CT等。反应缺血的定量追踪技术和灌注成像技术可能将进一步增强MVA的诊断,同时可长期监测治疗效果。     

Stress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging versus stress echocardiography: prognostic comparisons

The use of noninvasive stress cardiac imaging for stratifying risk in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease is growing as a tool for identification of the subgroup most likely to benefit from the expense and risk of more invasive procedures, including cardiac catheterization and coronary revascularization. In this setting, it is especially important that a test be able to identify patients with sufficiently low risk that clinicians are comfortable in deferring such interventions, especially in those with other markers of increased risk. Previous data have shown that cardiac risk is most closely related to the presence and extent of jeopardized viable myocardium on noninvasive stress cardiac imaging. Although stress echocardiography may have comparable ability to detect coronary artery disease, current data suggest that stress echocardiography detects significantly less jeopardized viable myocardium than stress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging and consequently fewer patients at risk for cardiac events. Stress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging may therefore have important advantages for risk stratification and the direction of future care of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.     

Microvascular Angina: Assessment of Coronary Blood Flow,Flow Reserve,and Metabolism

Microvascular angina (MVA) is an often overlooked cause of significant chest pain. Decreased myocardial perfusion secondary to dysregulated blood flow in the microvasculature can occur in the presence or absence of obstructive epicardial coronary artery disease. The corresponding myocardial ischemia and angina is now a well-established diagnosis, made by detection of decreased coronary flow reserve (CFR). Although low CFR and MVA are associated with poor prognosis, there is initial evidence for reversibility of this abnormal vascular regulation with aggressive medical therapy and control of associated risk factors. Current assessment of MVA is carried out predominantly during cardiac catheterization; however, noninvasive techniques to assess CFR are being developed, including PET, MRI, and CT modalities. Quantitative tracer techniques or imaging of metabolic disturbances reflecting ischemia will likely enhance diagnostic approaches for such patients as well as allow more frequent monitoring of response to therapy.     

Aktueller Stellenwert von CT und MRT in der Koronardiagnostik

Coronary catheter angiography is the current reference standard for assessing coronary artery disease (CAD). Novel advanced cardiac imaging methods, such as CT and MRI, are opening new opportunities for the noninvasive assessment of morphologic and functional aspects of CAD and provide new options for prevention and for guiding invasive strategies. Especially in patients with low to intermediate pretest likelihood, cardiac CT has been firmly established for ruling out significant CAD (coronary CT angiography) and for evidence-based risk classification (calcium scoring). The strength of cardiac MRI lies in the functional evaluation of CAD. MRI-based myocardial perfusion and function measurements enable accurate evaluation of potential myocardial ischemia. In addition, late enhancement studies enable high resolution imaging of myocardial scar and viability.     

Combination of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging and Coronary Artery Calcium Scanning: Potential Synergies for Improving Risk Assessment in Subjects with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

For many years, the mainstay of noninvasive evaluation of patients suspected of ischemic cardiovascular disease (CVD) centered on the use of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). In recent years, the advent of newer modalities such as coronary artery calcium (CAC) scanning, coronary CT angiography, and MRI have broadened the means of assessing cardiac patients for this purpose. Moreover, the advent of these newer modalities has created potential synergies whereby combinations of tests may be clinically useful. In this review, we assess the potential synergies between MPI, whether assessed by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or positron emission tomography (PET), and CAC scanning. Whereas MPI has long been used for diagnostic assessment and for risk stratification purposes, the emerging uses of CAC scanning now appear multifold: screening for CVD, triaging patients for diagnostic stress testing, improving risk stratification in patients following stress testing, and enhancing the direct management of patients’ CVD risk following CAC scanning. Recent work suggests that CAC scanning may be emerging as the initial test of choice for most asymptomatic patients. The advent of hybrid SPECT-CT and PET-CT scanners may signify an important new opportunity for the combined use of these modalities in the higher-risk asymptomatic patient population.     

Stress echocardiography versus myocardial SPECT for risk stratification of patients with coronary artery disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Diagnostic testing using noninvasive imaging has become an integral part of risk stratification in patients with coronary artery disease. It is important to understand the integral strengths and weaknesses between the different modalities of stress testing and to apply accurately the type of test the clinical scenario demands. RECENT FINDINGS: There have been tremendous advances made in the field of cardiac imaging. Both myocardial perfusion imaging and stress echocardiographic techniques continue to evolve and play an important role in the assessment of patients with coronary artery disease. SUMMARY: In this review the authors discuss the relative merits of both stress echocardiography and myocardial single photon emission computed tomographic imaging for diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with coronary artery disease.     

Value of gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for individual cardiac risk assessment

Myocardial perfusion imaging enables not only accurate diagnosis of disease but also entails prognostic value. Myocardial perfusion SPECT contributes to assessment of future cardiac events independently of other clinical parameters. A normal stress myocardial perfusion scan is associated with a favorable prognosis independent of history, symptoms, and exercise electrocardiography test variables. Cardiac risk and benefit from invasive therapeutic strategies increase in relation to the severity of the abnormality of perfusion and function assessed by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. Thus, stress myocardial perfusion imaging may serve as a gatekeeper for referral to coronary angiography enabling effective risk stratification in patients with suspected or documented coronary artery disease.     

Ischämielast versus Koronarmorphologie

Ischemic heart disease still represents the leading cause of death in the western world despite a decrease of mortality in the last decade. For the diagnostics of coronary artery morphology, invasive coronary angiography represents the gold standard. Nevertheless, in recent years the importance of functional diagnostics of the coronary arteries has increased and various imaging procedures for the measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) during coronary angiography were established and recommended for ischemia testing in the actual guidelines on myocardial revascularization.Imaging modalities for diagnostics of the functional relevance of coronary artery disease include stress echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and positron emission tomography (PET). These procedures enable advanced risk stratification and therapy guiding in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease. In future algorithms, hybrid imaging may facilitate the determination of anatomical and functional aspects after only one investigation.In the present article, the role of ischemia testing is compared with morphological methods for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease, individual risk stratification, and therapy guiding.     

Magnetic resonance imaging in acute myocardial infarction

Advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have led to more widespread utilization of this diagnostic imaging modality in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. With MRI, the complexity and heterogeneity of myocardial infarcts can be demonstrated. By using this technique, much insight has been gained into the pathophysiologic mechanisms of acute coronary thrombosis and reperfusion. MRI has significant diagnostic potential, particularly if one can combine studies of myocardial function, perfusion, and sodium metabolism with the noninvasive assessment of coronary anatomy and epicardial coronary artery blood flow.     

Usefulness and pitfalls in myocardial perfusion SPECT for detecting and assessing coronary artery disease

Thallium-201(Tl) is the dominant agent employed for myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease, assessment of myocardial viability and prognostication. Technetium-99m(Tc) labeled radionuclides have been used as excellent alternatives to Tl. This paper will review the usefulness and pitfall in myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography(SPECT) in patients with coronary artery disease. From a practical standpoint, we should know what are clinical questions, clinical status of patients(history and exercise ability of patients, obesity) and diagnostic accuracy of each diagnostic protocol and the performance in the nuclear laboratory. Myocardial perfusion defects during stress SPECT are produced by a heterogeneity in coronary blood flow, which depends on severity of coronary stenosis and consequent abnormalities in flow reserve. Certain factors can affect sensitivity and specificity of Tl SPECT for detection of coronary artery disease. Accurate determination of myocardial viability is vitally important for clinical decision making for patients with left ventricular(LV) dysfunction who will most benefit from revascularization. Hibernated myocardium may result in profound regional LV dysfunction in absence of necrosis. The various approach such as stress-redistribution-reinjection imaging, rest-redistribution imaging and rest-redistribution 24 hours delayed imaging has been utilized to assess myocardial viability with Tl. Alternatively, quantitative assessment of 99mTc-methoxy-isobutyl isonitrile(MIBI) and tetrofosmin uptake reflect the degree of viability. At the present time one of the most important clinical applications of exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT is the assessment of prognosis for patients with suspected and documented coronary artery disease. Patients with normal stress perfusion SPECT have a low event rate and excellent prognosis. Stress perfusion imagings have been widely used to stratify patients into different risk groups in the United State.     

Update in nuclear cardiology

Imaging techniques for the noninvasive detection and evaluation of coronary artery disease continue to develop. New techniques for the quantification of myocardial blood flow by positron-emission tomography, new approaches to metabolic imaging, and new gamma camera technology have the potential to expand the scope of cardiac nuclear medicine in many facilities. Determination of the best and most cost-effective method of assessing myocardial viability in patients with advanced coronary artery disease remains of key interest with research directed at alternative 201Tl imaging protocols, fatty acid metabolism, and viability assessment with the new 99mTc-based myocardial perfusion radiopharmaceuticals. The assessment of endothelial function and determination of coronary flow reserve with 13N-ammonia positron-emission tomography may aid in the identification of preclinical atherosclerosis, and in monitoring disease progression and response to therapy. New information in radionuclide perfusion imaging in young and elderly patients and in those with interventricular conduction disturbances may allow for more accurate identification of coronary artery disease. The role of radionuclide imaging in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy continues to evolve with the development of radiolabeled chemicals of the adrenergic nervous system and their analogues, which will be helpful in the stratification of disease severity. These new imaging techniques promise to increase the accuracy of nuclear cardiology for detection of disease, assessment of function, and prognosis.     

SPECT Imaging for Detecting Coronary Artery Disease and Determining Prognosis by Noninvasive Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion and Myocardial Viability

Basic knowledge of active and passive transport mechanisms for concentrating monovalent cations in myocardial cells led to the investigation of the application of radioisotopes of potassium, thallium, rubidium, and ammonia to the in vivo noninvasive assessment of regional myocardial perfusion and viability utilizing gamma camera or positron emission tomographic (PET) imaging technology. Subsequently, technetium-99m (Tc-99m)-labeled isonitriles (sestamibi and tetrofosmin), which bind to mitochondrial membranes, emerged as superior imaging agents with single photon emission tomography (SPECT) imaging. When any of these imaging agents are injected intravenously during either exercise or pharmacologic stress, myocardial defects in tracer uptake represent either abnormal regional flow reserve or myocardial scar reflecting of coronary artery disease (CAD). The major clinical indications for stress SPECT or PET myocardial perfusion imaging are for detection of CAD as the cause of chest pain and risk stratification for prognostication. Patients with normal stress myocardial perfusion scans have an excellent prognosis with <1.0% annual rate future annual death or nonfatal infarction. The greater the extent and severity of ischemic perfusion defects (defects seen on stress images but improve on resting images), the greater the subsequent death or infarction rate during follow-up. Rest imaging alone is performed for determination of myocardial viability in patients with CAD and severe left ventricular dysfunction. Myocardial segments showing >50% uptake compared to normal uptake have a better long-term outcome with revascularization than with medical therapy with enhanced left ventricular function and improved survival. Other applications of SPECT imaging include the evaluation of cardiac sympathetic function, assessment of myocardial metabolism in health and disease, and molecular imaging of coronary atherosclerosis and myocardial stem cell therapy.     

Multimodality Imaging for Assessment of Myocardial Viability: Nuclear,Echocardiography, MR,and CT

The assessment of myocardial viability may be an important component of the evaluation of patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. The primary goal of viability assessment in such patients is to guide therapeutic decisions by determining which patients would most likely benefit from revascularization. In patients with chronic coronary artery disease, left ventricular dysfunction may be a consequence of prior myocardium infarction, which is an irreversible condition, or reversible ischemic states such as stunning and hibernation. Imaging techniques utilize several methods to assess myocardial viability: left ventricular function, morphology, perfusion, and metabolism. Each technique (echocardiography, nuclear imaging, magnetic resonance imaging, and x-ray computed tomography) has the ability to assess one or more of these parameters. This article describes how each of these imaging modalities can be used to assess myocardial viability, and reviews the relative strengths and limitations of each technique.     

Assessment of coronary flow reserve: comparison between contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography

OBJECTIVES: The study compared flow reserve indices by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with quantitative measures of coronary angiography and positron emission tomography (PET). BACKGROUND: The noninvasive evaluation of myocardial flow by MRI has recently been introduced. However, a comparison to quantitative flow measurement as assessed by PET has not been reported in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Two groups of healthy volunteers and 25 patients with angiographically documented CAD were examined by MRI and PET at rest and during adenosine stress. Dynamic MRI was performed using a multi-slice ultra-fast hybrid sequence and a rapid gadolinium-diethylenetriaminepenta-acetic acid bolus injection (0.05 mmol/l). Upslope and peak-intensity indices were regionally determined from first-pass signal intensity curves and compared to N-13 ammonia PET flow reserve measurements. RESULTS: In healthy volunteers, the upslope analysis showed a stress/rest index of 2.1 plus minus 0.6, which was higher than peak intensity (1.5 plus minus 0.3), but lower than flow reserve by PET (3.9 plus minus 1.1). Localization of coronary artery stenoses (> 75%, MRI < 1.2), based on the upslope index, yielded sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of 69%, 89% and 79%, respectively. Upslope index correlated with PET flow reserve (r = 0.70). A reduced coronary flow reserve (PET < 2.0, MRI < 1.3) was detected by the upslope index with sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of 86%, 84% and 85%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging first-pass perfusion measurements underestimate flow reserve values, but may represent a promising semi-quantitative technique for detection and severity assessment of regional CAD.