Gastroesophageal reflux and pulmonary aspiration: incidence, functional abnormality, and results of surgical therapy.

The incidence of aspiration, the causative esophageal pathophysiology, and the results of surgical therapy were evaluated in 100 patients with abnormal gastroesophageal reflux documented by 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. Based on historical evidence, 48 patients were suspected to be aspirators. Eight patients had documented episodes of aspiration (drop on esophagela pH, followed by acid taste in mouth and onset of cough or wheezing spell) during the monitoring period. Nine patients were considered to be potential aspirators because they presented oral acid regurgitation without development of pulmonary symptoms. In five patients a primary respiratory disorder (PRD) induced gastroesophageal reflux. The remaining 78 patients had abnormal reflux without aspiartion or regurgitation. Aspirators had a 75% incidence of esophageal motor abnormality on manometry, and the clearance of refluxed acid was significantly delayed in the supine position. A history of heartburn and endoscopic evidence of esophagitis were present in only half of the patients who were documented aspirators. Potential aspirators were spared from aspiration by rapid esophageal clearance of refluxed acid unaffected by changes in body position. Patients with a PRD had higher distal esophageal segment (DES) pressure and normal esophageal motility with minimal esophagitis. Nonaspirators significantly improved their clearance while in the supine position, emphasizing the protective effect of esophageal peristalsis against aspiration. An antireflux procedure in five aspirators raised the DES pressure significantly and returned the reflux status to normal by 24-hour pH-monitoring standards. The incidence of aspiration appears to be less than that suspected by history and is due to a motor disorder that interferes with the ability of the esophagus to clear reflex acid. Abnormal pulmonary symptoms can induce or result from gastroesophageal reflux and, when the latter occurs, an antireflex procedure stops both reflux and aspiration.     

Symptomatic and physiologic outcomes after operative treatment for extraesophageal reflux

Background: Pharyngeal pH monitoring has recently been used to identify patients with extraesophageal symptoms induced by gastroesophageal reflux. We employed this method of acid detection to evaluate patients with respiratory symptoms prior to and after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication to further elucidate the relationship between GERD and respiratory symptoms. Methods: Twenty-one consecutive patients with extraesophageal symptoms thought to be caused by reflux underwent symptomatic and functional evaluation (esophageal manometry and 24-h pH monitoring with a pharyngeal probe) before and after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Episodes of pharyngeal acid exposure were considered abnormal if the pH dropped below 4, occurred simultaneously with esophageal acidification, and occurred outside meal times. Results: All patients had gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and respiratory symptoms; nine of 15 (60%) had evidence of pharyngeal reflux preoperatively. Antireflux procedures resulted in a significant decrease in pharyngeal reflux (7.9 to 1.6 episodes/24h; p <0.05) and esophageal acid exposure (7.5% to 2.1%; p <0.05). In patients with pharyngeal reflux and complete postoperative testing, three (60%) obtained improvement of respiratory symptoms and resolution of pharyngeal reflux. In two patients with recurrent respiratory symptoms after surgery, persistent pharyngeal reflux was detected. Conclusions: Operative treatment of GERD is effective in controlling extraesophageal reflux, measured subjectively and objectively. Evidence of pharyngeal reflux on pH testing helps to identify which patients with respiratory symptoms will benefit from an antireflux procedure.     

Gastric banding interferes with esophageal motility and gastroesophageal reflux

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux and progressive esophageal dilatation can develop after gastric banding (GB). HYPOTHESIS: Gastric banding may interfere with esophageal motility, enhance reflux, or promote esophageal dilatation. DESIGN: Before-after trial in patients undergoing GB. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1999 and August 2002, 43 patients undergoing laparoscopic GB for morbid obesity underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, 24-hour pH monitoring, and stationary esophageal manometry before GB and between 6 and 18 months postoperatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reflux symptoms, endoscopic esophagitis, pressures measured at manometry, esophageal acid exposure. RESULTS: There was no difference in the prevalence of reflux symptoms or esophagitis before and after GB. The lower esophageal sphincter was unaffected by surgery, but contractions in the lower esophagus weakened after GB, in correlation with preoperative values. There was a trend toward more postoperative nonspecific motility disorders. Esophageal acid exposure tended to decrease after GB, with fewer reflux episodes. A few patients developed massive postoperative reflux. There was no clear correlation between preoperative testing and postoperative esophageal acid exposure, although patients with abnormal preoperative acid exposure tended to maintain high values after GB. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative esophageal dysmotility and gastroesophageal reflux are not uncommon after GB. Preoperative testing should be done routinely. Low amplitude of contraction in the lower esophagus and increased esophageal acid exposure should be regarded as contraindications to GB. Patients with such findings should be offered an alternative procedure, such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.     

Gastroesophageal dysfunction in Cornelia de Lange syndrome

Children with Cornelia de Lange (CDL) syndrome present with feeding problems related to swallowing incoordination, poor esophageal motility, and gastroesophageal reflux (GER). These abnormalities of esophageal function result in failure to thrive and life-threatening aspiration pneumonia. Severe GER was documented in four patients with CDL syndrome. Three were managed successfully with an antireflux procedure (Nissen fundoplication) and a concomitant feeding gastrostomy. These observations confirm the high incidence of abnormal esophageal function in patients with CDL syndrome, and suggest that an antireflux procedure and feeding gastrostomy are important considerations in their clinical management.     

Alkaline gastroesophageal reflux.

Twenty-four hour monitoring provides a continuous record of the pH of the lower esophagus in a near physiologic setting. The upper level of physiologic reflux was determined from the percentage of time and the number of episodes that the pH was less than 4 or more than 7 and the mean duration of each episode in fifteen asymptomatic subjects. One hundred patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux were divided into four groups on the basis of twenty-four hour pH monitoring: those with abnormal acid but normal alkaline reflux, termed acid refluxers (51 patients); those with both abnormal acid and alkaline reflux, termed acid-alkaline refluxers (25); those with normal acid and abnormal alkaline reflux, termed alkaline refluxers (6); and those with both normal acid and alkaline reflux, termed nonrefluxers (18).Nonrefluxers had a similar incidence of heartburn, regurgitation, and dysphagia as acid and acid-alkaline refluxers, proving the inaccuracy of symptoms for detecting reflux. Alkaline refluxers had a lesser incidence of heartburn but a greater incidence of regurgitation, and four alkaline reflux patients presented with severe pulmonary disease secondary to aspiration. Similar incidence and degree of esophagitis was seen in acid, acid-alkaline, and alkaline refluxers. All three groups of symptomatic refluxers had a mean distal esophageal sphincter pressure significantly lower than that of the control asymptomatic subjects. There was no difference in the distal esophageal sphincter pressure between controls and symptomatic nonrefluxers.Nine of the patients with acid-alkaline reflux and one of the patients with alkaline reflux underwent an antireflux procedure and were restudied three months postoperatively. All ten patients had a 24 hour pH acid score within normal limits, but two had an abnormal 24 hour pH alkaline score. In both patients, reflux was demonstrated after placing an acid load in the stomach.It is concluded that symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux in patients with an intact gastrointestinal tract is a mixture of both acid and alkaline secretions, with one or both abnormal due to different degrees of acid production and pyloric regurgitation. Patients with alkaline reflux may develop serious complications of reflux in the absence of typical symptoms of heartburn. Twenty-four hour pH monitoring of the esophagus is useful in the identification of these patients and in evaluating the ability of an antireflux procedure to control both abnormal acid and alkaline reflux.     

Incidence and significance of gastroesophageal reflux following repair of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula and the need for anti-reflux procedures.

Patients with esophageal atresia and/or tracheoesophageal fistula are known to have disordered esophageal motility, but the incidence of significant gastroesophageal reflux requiring anti-reflux surgery remains undocumented. We have studied a series of patients from 2 wk to 13 yr post-repair, utilizing manometric motility and acid reflux techniques. All demonstrated abnormalities of esophageal motility, including aperistalsis, low amplitude contraction, and simultaneous contractions. Lower esophageal sphincter pressures ranged from 7 to 50 mm Hg. Fourteen patients demonstrated signifcant reflux and six patients required anti-reflux surgery for recurrent pneumonia or recurrent stricture. The incidence of significant gastroesophageal reflux requiring antireflux surgery appears significant following repair of esophageal atresia and/or tracheoesophageal fistula.     

Techniques and outcomes of laparoscopic surgery in gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to report personal experience in laparoscopic antireflux surgery and to analyze the clinical and functional outcomes of this procedure, also in relation to the different techniques used. METHODS: From 1996 to 2000, 20 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease associated with hiatal hernia underwent laparoscopic surgery. The indication for surgery was failure of long-term medical therapy. All patients had severe acid reflux on 24 hrs-pH monitoring, endoscopic evidence of esophagitis and hiatal hernia, and defective lower esophageal sphincter. A Nissen fundoplication was performed in 13 patients with normal esophageal body motility, and a 270 degrees posterior fundoplication in seven patients with low esophageal motility. RESULTS: Mortality and conversion rate were 0. Mean operative time was 135 min and mean postoperative hospital stay 5 days. Operative morbidity was 15%. All the patients were completely cured of reflux symptoms; transient mild postoperative dysphagia occurred in two patients (10%). There was a significantly improvement of the results in postoperative esophageal manometry and 24 hrs-pH monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary experience suggests that laparoscopic surgery represents a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Precise selection of patients and adequate surgical technique are essential.     

Multicenter, prospective, double-blind, randomized trial of laparoscopic nissen vs anterior 90 degrees partial fundoplication

HYPOTHESIS: Laparoscopic anterior 90 degrees partial fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux is associated with a lower incidence of postoperative dysphagia and other adverse effects compared with laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. DESIGN: A multicenter, prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Nine university teaching hospitals in 6 major cities in Australia and New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twelve patients with proven gastroesophageal reflux disease presenting for laparoscopic fundoplication were randomized to undergo either a Nissen (52 patients) or an anterior 90 degrees partial procedure (60 patients). Patients with esophageal motility disorders, patients requiring a concurrent abdominal procedure, and patients who had undergone previous antireflux surgery were excluded from this study. INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with division of the short gastric vessels or laparoscopic anterior 90 degrees partial fundoplication. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Independent assessment of dysphagia, heartburn, and overall satisfaction 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery using multiple clinical grading systems. Objective measurement of esophageal manometric parameters, esophageal acid exposure, and endoscopic assessment. RESULTS: Postoperative dysphagia, and wind-related adverse effects were less common after a laparoscopic anterior 90 degrees partial fundoplication. Relief of heartburn was better following laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Overall satisfaction was better after anterior 90 degrees partial fundoplication. Lower esophageal sphincter pressure, acid exposure, and endoscopy findings were similar for both procedures. CONCLUSIONS: At the 6-month follow-up, laparoscopic anterior 90 degrees culine partial fundoplication is followed by fewer adverse effects than laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with full fundal mobilization, and it achieves a higher rate of satisfaction with the overall outcome. However, this is offset to some extent by a greater likelihood of recurrent gastroesophageal reflux symptoms.     

Outcome after laparoscopic fundoplication is not dependent on a structurally defective lower esophageal sphincter

With the advent of laparoscopic surgery and the recognition that gastroesophageal reflux disease often requires lifelong medication, patients with normal resting sphincter characteristics are now being considered for surgery. The outcome of these patients after fundoplication is unknown and formed the basis of this study. The study population consisted of 123 patients undergoing laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication between 1992 and 1996. All patients had increased esophageal acid exposure on 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. Patients were divided into those with a normal (n = 36) and those with a structurally defective (n = 87) lower esophageal sphincter (LES), based on LES resting pressure (normal >6 mm Hg), overall length (normal >2 cm), and abdominal length (normal > 1 cm), and their outcomes were assessed. Each group was subsequently divided into patients presenting with a primary symptom that was "typical" (heartburn, regurgitation, or dysphagia) or "atypical" (gastric, respiratory, or chest pain) of gastroesophageal reflux, and outcome was assessed. Median duration of follow-up was 18 months after surgery. Overall, laparoscopic fundoplication was successful in relieving symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux in 90% of patients. Patients with a typical primary symptom had an excellent outcome irrespective of the resting status of the LES (95% and 97%, respectively). Atypical primary symptoms were significantly more common in patients with a normal LES (29%) than in those with a structurally defective LES (10%; P <0.05), and these symptoms were less likely (50%) to be relieved by antireflux surgery. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery is highly successful and not dependent on the status of the resting LES in patients with increased esophageal acid exposure and primary symptoms "typical" of gastroesophageal reflux. Antireflux surgery should be applied cautiously in patients with atypical primary symptoms. Presented in part at the Thirty-Eighth Annual Meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Washington, D.C., May 11–14,1997.     

Elevated body mass disrupts the barrier to gastroesophageal reflux; discussion 1018-9

HYPOTHESIS: Obesity impairs the antireflux function of a structurally intact barrier. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of body mass index in patients with normal esophageal manometric findings but with symptomatic and objectively confirmed gastroesophageal reflux. SETTING: Specialist esophageal center. PATIENTS: Patients symptomatic and diagnostic for gastroesophageal reflux, referred between October 1, 1998, and June 30, 2000. Exclusion criteria were a defective barrier, motility disorders, or previous surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reflux was defined and quantified using the DeMeester score, and body mass index was calculated. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between body mass index and severity of gastroesophageal reflux. Patients who were overweight had significantly higher distal esophageal acid exposure. No significant difference in manometric findings was demonstrated between patients with normal weight and those who were overweight. CONCLUSION: The barrier to gastroesophageal reflux is rendered insufficient in patients who are overweight.     

Roux-en-Y long limb diversion as the first option for patients who have Barrett's esophagus

In summary, vagotomy plus antrectomy and the Roux-en-Y procedure is based on the following points: (a) patients who have BE show several foregut abnormalities, including incompetent lower esophageal sphincter, impairment in the esophageal clearance, severe gastroesophageal acid reflux, and frequent duodenoesophageal reflux; (b) late results of classic antireflux procedure in BE are poor with a high recurrence rate owing to a progressive loosening of the wrap; (c) the esophageal damage is produced by the injurious component of the refluxate; and (d) among patients who underwent classic antireflux surgery, a certain proportion developed dysplasia or even adenocarcinoma in the follow-up. The authors have observed that the simple correction of the valve is not enough in many cases, because it does not abolish the gastroesophageal reflux but only diminishes it. In patients who have BE and therefore have impaired esophageal clearance, few reflux episodes can maintain or even induce more damage. With the reduction diversion antireflux procedure, the quality of the corrected valve is secondary, and the main goal is to avoid the reflux of injurious components of the refluxate instead of the refluxate itself, which is almost always impossible. Late results support this hypothesis, and the authors propose this surgical procedure as an alternative treatment in patients who have complicated BE or in patients who have long-segment BE. Among patients who have gastroesophageal reflux and intestinal metaplasia of the cardia or with a noncomplicated short-segment BE, laparoscopic antireflux surgery is the authors' first choice, and only the late objective evaluation of surgical treatment demonstrates which surgical technique is the more adequate to a particular patient who has BE.     

Gastroesophageal scintigraphy to assess the severity of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Thirty-six (36) patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux were studied. Symptoms of heartburn, regurgitation and dysphagia were scored as to their severity and compared to quantitative tests of gastroesophageal reflux. Patients were studied with the acid reflux test, fiberoptic endoscopy, esophageal mucosal biopsy with a pinch forceps, esophageal manometry and radioisotopic gastroesophageal scintigraphy. Symptoms were scored according to an arbitrary grading system as mild, moderate, or severe. There were significant correlations between symptoms scores and both the degree of endoscopic esophagitis and the gastroesophageal reflux indices as measured by the radioisotopic scintiscan, but not with the degree of histologic esophagitis or lower esophageal sphincter pressure. Review of the findings suggests the following profile for patients who might require antireflux surgery: severe symptoms, presence of endoscopic esophagitis; resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure below 10 mmHg; and gastroesophageal reflux index above 10%.     

Gastroesophageal reflux disease: symptoms versus pH monitoring results.

OBJECTIVES: The reason why some patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have symptoms of upper aerodigestive system irritation, while others mainly have gastroenterologic symptoms, is not well established. This retrospective case series study was designed to examine the existence of a correlation between symptoms and reflux characteristics, based on data obtained from esophageal pH monitoring. METHODS: The study population consisted of 139 patients; 97 patients presented with laryngopharyngeal symptoms of GERD, including unexplained hoarseness, throat clearing, chronic cough, laryngospasm, globus, throat pain, and 42 patients presented with gastroenterologic symptoms, including heartburn and regurgitation. The results of 24-hour, double-channel ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring were analyzed comparing 2 symptom groups. The incidence of abnormal acid reflux at the upper and lower esophageal segments and the effects of upright and supine positions on reflux parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: The incidence of laryngopharyngeal reflux was significantly higher in the laryngopharyngeal symptom group than in the other (52% versus 38%). The patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux from both groups showed no significant differences in terms of number of acid reflux episodes, percentage of times pH was 4, and esophageal acid clearance. Upright and supine parameters did not show significant differences between the patient groups. Upright acid reflux episodes were, however, common in both groups at the lower esophageal and laryngopharyngeal segments. CONCLUSION: Recent studies suggesting that otolaryngologic patients commonly show upright, daytime reflux with normal esophageal clearance and that typical GERD patients commonly have supine, nocturnal reflux with prolonged esophageal clearance are not supported by this study. This study indicates that acid reflux parameters and positional changes are not sufficient to explain why patients with GERD experience different symptoms. The regional symptoms of GERD may be attributed to the impairment of epithelial resistance, motor activity, and buffering systems for the esophageal antireflux barrier.     

Specificity and sensitivity of objective diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease

To evaluate the diagnostic value of different tests for gastroesophageal reflux disease, a test population was constructed from 45 patients with symptoms of heartburn and regurgitation with or without esophagitis and 45 healthy subjects, who never experienced heartburn, regurgitation, or swallowing discomfort. The test population underwent esophagoscopy, standard acid reflux test, 24-hour pH monitoring, and manometry of the lower esophageal sphincter. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the accuracy of the tests and test combinations were calculated. Esophagoscopy had a sensitivity of 62%, that is, only 62% of patients with the disease have evidence of mucosal damage on endoscopy. Manometric measurements of the lower esophageal sphincter had a sensitivity of 84%, a specificity of 89%, and an accuracy of 87%. Twenty-four hour esophageal pH monitoring had a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 96%. The results show that 24-hour pH monitoring can detect gastroesophageal reflux disease with an accuracy of 96% by measuring an increase in esophageal acid exposure. Manometry of the lower esophageal sphincter can detect a mechanically deficient sphincter as a cause of the disease with an accuracy of 87%. The test combination of 24-hour monitoring and motility studies can select patients with an accuracy of 91% who have an increase in esophageal exposure to gastric juice because of a deficient cardia. Antireflux surgery is designed to reduce esophageal exposure to gastric juice in patients with a deficient sphincter by creating a mechanical antireflux mechanism at the cardia. Therefore it is necessary to determine the mechanical status of the sphincter with manometry before surgery in such patients. Thus the indications for antireflux surgery are (1) uncontrolled symptoms of increased esophageal exposure to gastric juice; (2) a documented increase in esophageal exposure to gastric juice by 24-hour pH monitoring; and (3) a mechanically defective sphincter on motility with a pressure of 6 mm Hg or less, an overall length of 2 cm or less, and an abdominal length of 1 cm or less.     

Inflammation and specialized intestinal metaplasia of cardiac mucosa is a manifestation of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to test the hypothesis that cardiac mucosa, carditis, and specialized intestinal metaplasia at an endoscopically normal-appearing cardia are manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: In the absence of esophageal mucosal injury, the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease currently rests on 24-hour pH monitoring. Histologic examination of the esophagus is not useful. The recent identification of specialized intestinal metaplasia at the cardia, along with the observation that it occurs in inflamed cardiac mucosa, led the authors to focus on the type and condition of the mucosa at the gastroesophageal junction and its relation to gastroesophageal reflux disease. METHODS: Three hundred thirty-four consecutive patients with symptoms of foregut disease, no evidence of columnar-lined esophagus, and no history of gastric or esophageal surgery were evaluated by 1) endoscopic biopsies above, at, and below the gastroesophageal junction; 2) esophageal motility; and 3) 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. The patients were divided into groups depending on the histologic presence of cardiac epithelium with and without inflammation or associated intestinal metaplasia. Markers of gastroesophageal reflux disease were compared between groups (i.e., lower esophageal sphincter characteristics, esophageal acid exposure, the presence of endoscopic erosive esophagitis, and hiatal hernia). RESULTS: When cardiac epithelium was found, it was inflamed in 96% of the patients. The presence of cardiac epithelium and carditis was associated with deterioration of lower esophageal sphincter characteristics and increased esophageal acid exposure. Esophagitis occurred more commonly in patients with carditis whose sphincter, on manometry, was structurally defective. Specialized intestinal metaplasia at the cardia was only seen in inflamed cardiac mucosa, and its prevalence increased both with increasing acid exposure and with the presence of esophagitis. CONCLUSION: The findings of cardiac mucosa, carditis, and intestinal metaplasia in an endoscopically normal-appearing gastroesophageal junction are histologic indicators of gastroesophageal reflux disease. These findings may be among the earliest signs of gastroesophageal reflux and contribute to the authors understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease process.     

The hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter: A motility disorder with manometric features of outflow obstruction

The aim of this study was to define the clinical presentation, motility characteristics, and prevalence and patterns of gastroesophageal reflux in patients with hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter (HTLES). HTLES was defined by a resting pressure measured at the respiratory inversion point on stationary manometry of greater than 26 mm Hg (ninety-.fth percentile of normal). One hundred consecutive patients (80 women, 20 men; mean age 54.7 years, range 23 to 89 years), diagnosed with HTLES at our institution between September 1996 and October 1999, were studied. Patients with achalasia or other named esophageal motility disorders or history of foregut surgery were excluded, but patients with both HTLESand ‘nutcracker esophagus’ were included. Themost commonsymptoms in patients withHTLES were regurgitation (75%), heartburn (71%), dysphagia (71%), and chest pain (49%). The most common primary presenting symptoms were heartburn and dysphagia. The intrabolus pressure, which is a manometric measure of Outflow obstruction, was significantly higher in patients with HTLES compared to normal volunteers. The residual pressure measured during LES relaxation induced by a water swallow was also significantly higher than in normal persons. There were no significant associations between any of the relaxation parameters studied (residual pressure, nadir pressure, duration of relaxation, time to residual pressure) and either the presence or severity of any symptoms or the presence of abnormal esophageal acid exposure. Seventy-three patients underwent 24-hour pH monitoring, and 26% had increased distal esophageal acid exposure. Compared to a cohort of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease but no HTLES (n _ 300), the total and supine periods of distal esophageal acid exposure were significantly lower in the patients with HTLES and abnormal acid exposure. Patients with HTLES frequently present with moderately severe dysphagia and typical reflux symptoms. Approximately one quarter of them have abnormal esophageal acid exposure on pH monitoring. Patients with HTLES have significantly elevated intrabolus and residual relaxation pressures on liquid boluses, suggesting that Outflow obstruction is present.     

Pharyngeal swallowing. The major factor in clearance of esophageal reflux episodes.

OBJECTIVE: This study defined the clearance mechanisms of naturally occurring reflux episodes in normal subjects and patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. SUMMARY BACKGROUND: Previous studies on acid clearance have been performed in the laboratory setting in supine subjects using acid instillation and stationary motility. The mechanisms of clearance have not been studied using ambulatory pH and motility monitoring. METHODS: A new system capable of monitoring simultaneously for 24 hours pharyngeal pressure, esophageal motility, and pH was used to study the clearance of naturally occurring reflux episodes in 10 normal subjects and 18 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Esophageal contraction waves were classified as primary (i.e., initiated by a pharyngeal swallow) and secondary (i.e., unrelated to a pharyngeal swallow). RESULTS: A total of 1288 reflux episodes were analyzed, during which 2781 contraction waves occurred. Clearance (i.e., restoration of pH to > 4) occurred after primary peristalsis in 83% of reflux episodes. An additional 11% were cleared by pharyngeal swallows without an esophageal body response. Secondary waves were rare and when they occurred, only 19% were peristaltic. Secondary peristalsis cleared only 9 of the 1288 reflux episodes. Patients and normal subjects cleared reflux episodes similarly. Baseline swallowing frequency was 0.87/min during the daytime and increased to 2.59/min (p < 0.01) during daytime reflux episodes. Swallowing frequency in response to nighttime reflux episodes was less (1.42/min; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Pharyngeal swallowing is the most important mechanism for esophageal acid clearance. Secondary waves are rare, usually disorganized, and unimportant in clearing a reflux episode. During sleep, the mechanisms of clearance are depressed.     

Obesity and Gastro-esophageal Acid Reflux: Physiopathological Mechanisms and Role of Gastric Bariatric Surgery

Background: Controversial findings about the relationships between obesity and gastro-esophageal reflux have been reported, as well as about the effects of weight loss and bariatric surgery on reflux. The aims of this study were to evaluate esophageal motility and gastro-esophageal acid circadian patterns in obese patients and to test the effects of vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) on these parameters. Methods: 14 obese subjects (BMI 36-53 kg/m²), 4 men, 10 women, 27-61 years old, admitted for elective bariatric surgery, underwent clinical evaluation, upper endoscopy, esophageal manometry and gastroesophageal pH monitoring. Evaluations were repeated 6 to 12 months after gastric surgery that consisted of a VBG (7 patients), accompanied in the other 7 patients with an anti-reflux procedure (fundoplication). Manometric and pH-metric findings in the obese patients were compared with a normal-weight control group before and after the two different surgical treatments. Results: Gastro-esophageal reflux was significantly more frequent in obese (57.1%) than in control group (7.1%). Esophageal motility in obese subjects was not different from controls. After VBG alone, we found a reduction in basal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and an increase of acid reflux. When VBG was accompanied by fundoplication, basal LES pressure increased and acid reflux frequency decreased. Conclusions: Obesity is associated with gastroesophageal reflux. VBG reduced weight, but not gastro-esophageal acid reflux. Therefore, in our population, this operation cannot be considered as an antireflux procedure.     

Patterns of postcibal gastroesophageal reflux in symptomatic infants.

Symptomatic infants displayed three patterns of gastroesophageal reflux after drinking apple juice (20 ml/kg or 300 ml/m2 of body surface area). The type I pattern occurred in patients who had continuous postcibal gastroesophageal reflux, large hiatal hernias and frequently required an antireflux operation. A functional motility disorder suggesting delayed gastric emptying appeared to be important in infants with discontinuous reflux (type II pattern). These infants had frequent gastroesophageal reflux for only 2 3/4 hours postcibally, antral-pylorospasm, increased low esophageal sphincter pressures, and a high incidence of pulmonary symptoms and non-specific watery diarrhea. The mixed (type III) pattern of gastroesophageal reflux occurred in a small number of infants and exhibited features of both type I and II patterns.     

Acid normalization and improved esophageal motility after Nissen fundoplication: equivalent outcomes in patients with normal and ineffective esophageal motility

BACKGROUND: Severe gastroesophageal reflux disease may result in acquired esophageal dysmotility. The correct surgical approach to associated gastroesophageal reflux disease and dysmotility is controversial, in particular whether the "gold-standard" total fundoplication of Nissen is appropriate compared with partial fundoplication. Our unit has performed total fundoplication for all patients, irrespective of esophageal motility, and this article describes that experience. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients undergoing antireflux surgery were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (n=60) consisted of patients with normal esophageal motility, and group 2 (n=38) had dysmotility. All patients underwent preoperative and postoperative manometry, 24-hour pH testing, symptom scoring, and quality-of-life assessment. RESULTS: The median postoperative acid score was not significantly different between groups 1 and 2. Eighty-eight percent of patients with normal motility and 89% of patients with dysmotility had no symptoms or minor symptoms, with a significant improvement in quality of life 6 months after surgery. There was a significant increase in esophageal wave amplitude in both groups, and 20 patients (53%) in the dysmotility group reverted to normal motility after surgery. Recurrent symptoms were associated with postoperative abnormal pH profiles in 5 patients from group 1 and 3 from group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative dysmotility is not a contraindication for total fundoplication. Postoperative acid control is associated with improved esophageal clearance and symptoms.