听神经瘤术中听力监测及术后听力保留影响因素分析

目的探讨听神经瘤术中听力监测的应用及术后听力保留的可能影响因素。方法16例采用乙状窦后入路手术切除听神经瘤的成年患者,分为两组,术中采用听性脑干反应(auditory brainstem response,ABR)和耳蜗电图(electrocochleogram,ECochG)联合监测为监测组(8例),未监测者为未监测组(8例),比较两组患者术后听力保留情况,采用单因素分析,分析影响听力保留的可能因素,包括:年龄、病程、肿瘤大小、术前纯音听阈和言语识别率、术中是否行ABR和ECochG联合监测、内听道是否扩大、肿瘤和神经是否粘连等。结果前庭诱发肌源性电位(VEMP)提示16例患者肿瘤来源于前庭上神经,监测组中6例术中及术毕ABR波Ⅰ、Ⅴ和复合动作电位(CAP)持续存在,术后听力保留;1例术中ABR波Ⅰ、Ⅴ和ECochG CAP持续存在,但术后无可用听力;1例术中切除肿瘤时ECochG与基线重复性良好,ABR波V消失,手术结束波V仍未恢复;监测组术后听力保留率为75.0%(6/8),未监测组术后无一例保留听力,差异有统计学意义(P=0.007)。单因素分析显示,年龄、病程、肿瘤大小、术前纯音听阈以及内听道扩大与术后听力保留率无关(P>0.05),术前言语识别率、术中ABR和ECochG联合监测、肿瘤和神经粘连与否与术后听力保留率相关(P<0.05)。结论听神经瘤切除术中ABR和ECochG连续监测对指导手术和提高术后听力保留率有重要意义,肿瘤与神经粘连是术后听力保留的重要影响因素,手术技巧、术前听力、肿瘤大小、内听道扩大等是否是术后听力保留的影响因素需扩大样本进一步研究验证。     

Hearing preservation using combined monitoring of extra-tympanic electrocochleography and auditory brainstem responses during acoustic neuroma surgery

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an intraoperative monitoring hearing preservation strategy that includes simultaneous recordings of an auditory brainstem response (ABR) and non-invasive electrocochleography (ECochG). The combined ABR and tympanic membrane (TM) ECochG testing was performed in 74 patients undergoing acoustic neuroma (AN) surgery. In addition, EMG recordings were conducted to monitor the facial nerve function. Hearing was preserved in 19 of the 30 patients with residual hearing prior to surgery (63%), and facial nerve function was maintained in 89% of the patients. In most cases, the presence of both auditory brainstem and TM-ECochG responses at the end of surgery was associated with preservation of postoperative functional hearing; however, eight patients had a TM-ECochG response with a complete loss of the ABR, pointing to deafferentation of the auditory nerve. Tumour size and preoperative hearing thresholds significantly affected the postoperative hearing. The TM-ECochG response yielded large reproducible responses, which, in some patients, was the only way to monitor the auditory function. This auditory monitoring approach offers a valuable auditory tool that helps to improve the hearing preservation during AN surgery.     

Hearing preservation using combined monitoring of extra-tympanic electrocochleography and auditory brainstem responses during acoustic neuroma surgery

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an intraoperative monitoring hearing preservation strategy that includes simultaneous recordings of an auditory brainstem response (ABR) and non-invasive electrocochleography (ECochG). The combined ABR and tympanic membrane (TM) ECochG testing was performed in 74 patients undergoing acoustic neuroma (AN) surgery. In addition, EMG recordings were conducted to monitor the facial nerve function. Hearing was preserved in 19 of the 30 patients with residual hearing prior to surgery (63%), and facial nerve function was maintained in 89% of the patients. In most cases, the presence of both auditory brainstem and TM-ECochG responses at the end of surgery was associated with preservation of postoperative functional hearing; however, eight patients had a TM-ECochG response with a complete loss of the ABR, pointing to deafferentation of the auditory nerve. Tumour size and preoperative hearing thresholds significantly affected the postoperative hearing. The TM-ECochG response yielded large reproducible responses, which, in some patients, was the only way to monitor the auditory function. This auditory monitoring approach offers a valuable auditory tool that helps to improve the hearing preservation during AN surgery.     

Acoustic neuroma surgery: use of cochlear nerve action potential monitoring for hearing preservation

OBJECTIVES: To compare the hearing preservation results obtained with use of two intraoperative eighth nerve monitoring methods, cochlear nerve action potential (CNAP) and auditory brainstem response (ABR), during complete acoustic neuroma (AN) resection. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Thirty-three consecutive patients who underwent hearing preservation AN surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Intraoperative monitoring by CNAP and/or ABR during AN resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Postoperative hearing. Hearing preservation was considered achieved for pure-tone average < or =50 dB and speech discrimination > or =50%. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients met inclusion criteria for the study. Monitoring was successfully performed in 23 of 25 patients (92%) who underwent attempted CNAP monitoring and 13 of 27 (48%) who underwent attempted ABR monitoring. When tumor size was < or =20 mm in greatest dimension, hearing preservation was achieved in 12 of 18 patients (67%) monitored with CNAP, versus 2 of 8 patients (25%) not monitored with CNAP (p = 0.05). Monitoring by ABR did not improve hearing preservation rates compared with those not monitored with ABR (40% vs. 63%). At the completion of surgery, the presence or absence of CNAP predicted the presence or absence of hearing preservation in 18 of 23 cases (p = 0.01), while ABR successfully predicted hearing results in 10 of 13 cases (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: When CNAP and ABR monitoring techniques during AN surgery were compared, CNAP was more frequently obtainable. Monitoring by CNAP was significantly associated with a higher chance of hearing preservation. Monitoring by ABR did not have a positive influence on hearing preservation results. Both ABR and CNAP were useful for predicting postoperative hearing.     

听性脑干反应和蜗神经直接动作电位联合听觉监护在侧颅底手术中的应用

目的:通过听性脑干反应(ABR)和蜗神经动作电位(CNAP)在侧颅底外科手术中的应用,分析造成听力损伤的原因,并对这两种听觉监测技术作出评价。方法:在手术过程中对14例保留听力的侧颅底手术的患者进行听觉监测。ABR在整个手术过程中监测,CNAP在打开脑膜、暴露蜗神经后进行监测。在患者出院后1个月左右随访听力。结果:所有患者在手术过程中都有不同程度的ABR变化,尤其是耳科电钻使用后[相对使用前延长(0.19±0.16)ms)]和颅内操作时[相对操作前延长(0.29±0.25)ms]。部分患者的波形潜伏期延长在术毕时有所恢复[10例,平均缩短(0.27±0.16)ms]。结论:侧颅底手术中应用听觉监护能防止听觉损伤。电钻使用造成的震动和噪声对听力有损伤,解除引起波形潜伏期延长的诱因后可恢复部分听力。术后的听力预后与术毕潜伏期的延长有相对应关系。术中监测的新趋势是联合应用ABR和CNAP,取长补短。     

两种听觉监护在听神经瘤术中的联合应用及评价

目的　探讨听神经瘤手术中听觉监护的意义。比较听性脑干反应（ABR）和蜗神经动作电位（cochlear nerve action potential,CNAP）在听觉监护应用中的价值。方法　回顾性分析我中心12例保留听力手术的听神经瘤患者资料及术中情况,患者术前均有实用听力（AAO-HNS分级A级、B级）,可引出ABR波形,V波分化可,所有手术均采取乙状窦后径路摘除肿瘤。所有患者均全程ABR监护,术中打开脑膜后联合监测CNAP。结果　手术过程中所有患者ABR波形较术前基线均有不同程度的变化,可记录到V波潜伏期均较基线延长（0.68±0.41）ms。CNAP波幅个体差异性较大,可记录到的P1潜伏期均较基线延长（0.25±0.16）ms。12例中有8例（66.7%）患者术后保留可用听力;另外4例（33.3%）术后达不到可用听力,此4例患者ABR表现为3例V波消失,1例V波潜伏期延长。CNAP表现为2例CNAP的P1消失,2例P1延长。电钻钻磨造成的震动和噪声、手术时神经被牵拉或热损伤后等急性损伤后ABR和CNAP波幅均出现短时间急剧下降,手术暂停5 min后,部分患者波幅可在一定程度恢复。结论　听神经瘤手术中ABR和CNAP对于听觉监护均有一定意义。ABR波形稳定可靠,但叠加时间相对较长;CNAP叠加快速,可提升监测灵敏度,但波形变异度较大。电钻钻磨造成的震动和噪声、操作过程中对神经组织的牵拉以及热损伤均被及时监控,两者联合应用可提升听神经瘤手术的听觉功能保留率。     

Intra-operative monitoring of cochlear function during cochlear implantation

The objective of this study was to determine if intra-operative auditory monitoring is feasible during cochlear implantation and whether this can be used as feedback to the surgeon to improve the preservation of residual hearing. This prospective non-randomised study was set in a paediatric tertiary referral hospital. Thirty eight consecutive paediatric patients undergoing cochlear implantation who had measurable auditory thresholds pre-operatively were divided into two cohorts. The unmonitored cohort included the first 22 patients and the monitored cohort included the last 16 patients. The main outcome measure(s) were pre-operative, intra-operative and more than one month post-operative average auditory thresholds at 500, 1000 and 2000 Hz measured using auditory steady-state response audiometry. The average pre-operative thresholds were 103.5 dB HL and 99.7 dB HL in the unmonitored and monitored cohorts, respectively. These were not statistically different (p > 0.3). In the monitored cohort, we measured auditory thresholds to assess cochlear function at multiple time points during the operation. Compared to baseline, thresholds were increased 0.7 dB after drilling the mastoidectomy and well, 0.2 dB after opening the cochlea and 4.6 dB after inserting the electrode array. One month post-operatively, the average thresholds were 114.0 dB HL in the unmonitored cohort but only 98.8 dB HL in the monitored cohort (p < 0.001). Both the use of intra-operative auditory monitoring and higher pre-operative thresholds were associated with improved preservation of residual hearing (p 相似文献   

Intraoperative auditory monitoring in vestibular schwannoma surgery: new trends

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficiency of a new method of brainstem auditory-evoked potential (BAEP) monitoring during complete vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection with attempted hearing preservation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Dedicated software providing near real-time recording was developed using a rejection strategy of artifacts based on spectral analysis. A small sample number (maximum 200) is required and results are obtained within 10 s. Fourteen consecutive patients with hearing class A operated on for VS, in an attempt to preserve hearing, participated in the investigation. Postoperatively, 7 patients (50%) had useful hearing (hearing class A, 4/14; hearing class B, 3/14) on the operated side. Seven patients (50%) were reduced to hearing class D. RESULTS: Drilling of the internal auditory canal (IAC) and tumor removal at the lateral end of the IAC were identified as the two most critical steps for achieving hearing preservation. Intraoperative BAEP monitoring was sensitive in detecting auditory damage with useful feedback but its effectiveness in preventing irreversible hearing impairment was not demonstrated in this study. CONCLUSION: Combined BAEP and direct auditory nerve monitoring using the same equipment will be performed in the future in an attempt to enhance the chances of preventing irreversible hearing damage, and possibly to improve the hearing outcome significantly.     

The efficacy of brainstem auditory evoked potentials in acoustic tumor surgery

As the identification of patients with small acoustic neuromas and salvageable hearing increases, intraoperative auditory nerve monitoring has been used increasingly in an attempt to improve the hearing preservation rate. Far-field recordings obtained by brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP), at times enhanced by electrocochleography, have become a standard method of intraoperative auditory nerve assessment. To evaluate the usefulness of this monitoring technique, the hearing preservation results of a series of unmonitored acoustic tumor removals were compared to a series of patients monitored via the standard brainstem auditory evoked potentials. With comparable average tumor sizes, 4 of 7 unmonitored patients had hearing preserved at preoperative levels compared to 4 of 9 monitored patients. Neither preoperative BAEP assessments nor absolute tumor size were predictive of hearing preservation. This report brings into question the effectiveness of far-field intraoperative BAEP monitoring during acoustic tumor resection and suggests that direct auditory nerve monitoring may be more appropriate.     

Hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery.

This article reviews the Montreal experience of hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery. The medical records since 1995 of 36 patients who underwent acoustic neuroma extirpation with the intent to preserve hearing were examined. Intraoperative monitoring was conducted using auditory brainstem response measurement with electrocochleography via a transtympanic electrode. The role of intraoperative monitoring in guiding surgical technique and its correlation with postoperative hearing outcome are discussed. A review of the literature regarding hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery is included.     

Evaluation of three intraoperative auditory monitoring techniques in acoustic neuroma surgery

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of three intraoperative auditory monitoring techniques: auditory brainstem response (ABR), electrocochleography (ECoG), and direct eight nerve monitoring (DENM). STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of the intraoperative recordings of ABR, ECoG, and DENM was performed. SETTING: A private, neurotologic practice. PATIENTS: Sixty-six patients with usable preoperative hearing underwent intraoperative auditory monitoring with ABR, ECoG, or DENM. INTERVENTIONS: Intraoperative auditory monitoring. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative pure-tone hearing threshold and word recognition scores. RESULTS: Of the 66 patients, 16 (24%) had postoperative serviceable hearing. Five (18%) of the 28 with ABR monitoring, 3 (17%) of the 18 with ECoG monitoring, and 8 (40%) of the 20 with DENM monitoring had serviceable hearing after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that DENM may be more effective than ABR or ECoG, although the differences in hearing preservation rates are not statistically significant.     

听神经瘤术中连续听力监测的初步探讨

目的探讨听神经瘤外科术中连续听力监测的意义。方法采用乙状窦人路，在听性脑干反应（auditory brainstem response，ABR）和耳蜗电图（electrocochleogram，ECochG）监测下完成的听神经瘤切除术10例。对手术过程和术后听力结合术中监测进行分析。结果10例听神经瘤术前听力A级3耳，B级4耳，C级3耳（美国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学会分级标准）。术前的ABR检查Ⅰ、Ⅲ、Ⅴ波存在者5耳（A级3耳，B级2耳），仅见Ⅰ波者5耳（B级2耳，C级3耳）。麻醉后手术前的监测显示：Ⅰ、Ⅲ、Ⅴ波存在者2耳，仅Ⅰ波存在者6耳，以复合动作电位（compound action potential，CAP）的N1波代替波Ⅰ；无波形者2耳。术后听力保留2耳，肿瘤均〈2cm，术前听力都为A级；连续听力监测显示1耳术中及术毕时Ⅰ、Ⅲ、Ⅴ持续存在，1耳Ⅰ、Ⅲ波存在，Ⅴ波消失；术后听力均为A级。听力未保留8耳，其中6耳术中监测时仅CAP的N1（波Ⅰ）存在，手术过程中夹内听动脉或处理内耳道处肿瘤时，4耳CAP波幅明显下降，甚至下降至0，术毕又恢复至术前的50％～60％或正常；1耳蜗神经与肿瘤一并切除，但CAP始终存在；1耳因牵拉脑干侧的耳蜗神经，CAP波幅降至0，手术结束亦未恢复。2耳为全身麻醉后术前监测中未引出任何波形者，其中1耳术中切除部分肿瘤后，出现CAP波，但波幅低，直至术毕；1耳始终未出现波形。结论联合应用ABR和ECochG术中监测，对提高听力保护率有积极意义，能及时反映术中与保留听力相关的敏感手术步骤，然而外科医师的熟练的解剖和精确的手术技巧是手术成功的最基本因素。     

Intraoperative auditory monitoring in vestibular schwannoma surgery: new trends

Objective To investigate the efficiency of a new method of brainstem auditory-evoked potential (BAEP) monitoring during complete vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection with attempted hearing preservation.

Material and Methods Dedicated software providing near real-time recording was developed using a rejection strategy of artifacts based on spectral analysis. A small sample number (maximum 200) is required and results are obtained within 10 s. Fourteen consecutive patients with hearing class A operated on for VS, in an attempt to preserve hearing, participated in the investigation. Postoperatively, 7 patients (50%) had useful hearing (hearing class A, 4/14; hearing class B, 3/14) on the operated side. Seven patients (50%) were reduced to hearing class D.

Results Drilling of the internal auditory canal (IAC) and tumor removal at the lateral end of the IAC were identified as the two most critical steps for achieving hearing preservation. Intraoperative BAEP monitoring was sensitive in detecting auditory damage with useful feedback but its effectiveness in preventing irreversible hearing impairment was not demonstrated in this study.

Conclusions Combined BAEP and direct auditory nerve monitoring using the same equipment will be performed in the future in an attempt to enhance the chances of preventing irreversible hearing damage, and possibly to improve the hearing outcome significantly.     

Acoustic neuroma surgery: absent auditory brainstem response does not contraindicate attempted hearing preservation.

OBJECTIVE: Absence of auditory brainstem response (ABR) waveforms has been associated with a poor likelihood of hearing preservation following resection of acoustic neuromas. Our experience is reviewed for patients with absent preoperative ABR regarding hearing preservation, hearing improvement, and return of ABR. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of 22 cases of acoustic neuroma resection. Nine patients with absent preoperative ABR were identified. All underwent tumor resection utilizing intraoperative cochlear nerve action potential (CNAP) monitoring. Postoperative hearing results and ABR waveforms were examined. METHODS: Charts were reviewed and tabulated for age, sex, tumor side, tumor size, preoperative and postoperative audiometric and ABR results, intraoperative monitoring results by ABR and CNAP, and surgical complications. RESULTS: Hearing preservation was achieved in seven of nine patients (78%) with absent preoperative ABR, as well as six of seven patients (86%) with tumors less than or equal to 20 mm in greatest dimension. Although intraoperative ABR monitoring was not possible in any of these patients, CNAP monitoring was successful in all. Return of ABR waveforms was observed in four of the six patients (67%) tested from 3 to 22 months postoperatively. Four of the seven patients (57%) enjoyed improvement in hearing class as defined by the guidelines of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Absent ABR waveforms have not been a negative prognostic sign regarding hearing preservation. CNAP monitoring is possible in these patients and likely helps to minimize iatrogenic cochlear nerve trauma. Patients with no ABR waveforms have hope of hearing preservation and even improvement following acoustic neuroma resection performed utilizing CNAP monitoring and hearing preservation surgical techniques.     

Intraoperative monitoring of cochlear function using distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) in patients with cerebellopontine angle tumors.

HYPOTHESIS: Intraoperative monitoring by distortion-product otoacoustic emissions reflects the cochlear function changes in the real-time domain during removal of cerebellopontine angle tumors. BACKGROUND: Cerebellopontine angle tumor surgery is associated with a significant risk of damaging internal auditory canal contents. Although monitoring facial nerve function intraoperatively has already been effectively developed, such efficacious monitoring of auditory function remains to be established. The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions for intraoperative monitoring of the cochlear function in humans during removal of cerebellopontine angle tumors. METHODS: Continuous intraoperative monitoring of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions was performed in 20 of 62 patients undergoing surgical removal of cerebellopontine angle tumors. All of these 20 patients, who underwent the retrosigmoid approach, had distortion-product otoacoustic emissions present preoperatively. Depending on the amplitude and frequency band at which distortion-product otoacoustic emissions were present, monitoring was carried out at 2.0 to 6.0 kHz with primary stimulus tone amplitudes of 60 to 70 dB sound pressure level. RESULTS: In patients operated on for cerebellopontine angle tumors, various patterns of distortion-product otoacoustic emission amplitude reductions and recoveries were observed. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions recorded from the basal part of the cochlea (i.e., high frequencies) changed earlier and more profoundly than those from the middle and apical sections (i.e., lower frequencies). In some cases, cochlear function was affected irreversibly as reflected by loss of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Microcoagulation of small vessels, tumor debulking, and compression or stretch of the internal auditory canal contents were found to be procedures affecting distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. The status of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions at the conclusion of tumor dissection correlated with postoperative hearing levels. CONCLUSION: Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions were used to monitor in the real-time domain auditory function during cerebellopontine angle tumor removal operations. The status of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions at the conclusion of the operations was related to postoperative hearing.     

Conservative management versus surgery for small vestibular schwannomas

A high rate of deterioration in hearing function and the loss of patient compliance during conservative management should be taken into account when considering hearing preservation strategies for patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS).To compare conservative management with surgery for solitary small VS.Among 693 patients followed up for VS between 1991 and 2002, 114 (16%) intracanalicular VSs (stage 1) and 302 (44%) VSs measuring <15 mm in the cerebellopontine angle (stage 2) were included in this study. Initially, surgery was performed in 305 (73%) cases (50 stage 1, 255 stage 2) and 111 (27%) were managed conservatively (64 stage 1, 54 stage 2) by means of annual MRI scans and audiometry. Conservative management was chosen in patients aged >60 years and in those who refused surgery. In this subgroup, the mean follow-up period was 33 months (range 6-111 months).In the conservative management group, 47% of VSs showed significant growth, 47% were stable and 6% showed regression. Seventeen patients (15%) were operated on secondarily for tumour growth and 1 (1%) was irradiated for tumour growth and because surgery was contraindicated. Deterioration of hearing function by > or =1 class was observed in 56% of cases, 34% of patients were initially in hearing class D and only 10% showed stable hearing function. Of the conservative management group, 17% were lost during follow-up. After surgery, grade 1 or 2 facial function was obtained in 86% of cases. Following hearing preservation attempts (n=137), 54% of patients were in hearing classes A-C.     

Intraoperative monitoring of auditory function: Experimental observations and new applications

The three different methods of intraoperative monitoring, namely, auditory brainstem response evaluation (ABR), electrocochleography (ECoG), and direct eighth nerve compound action potentials monitoring are reviewed. Both ECoG and direct eighth nerve monitoring surpass the ABR in their ability to provide fast, almost instantaneous, large, reproducible potentials in response to click stimuli. Changes in the amplitude and the latency of these potentials alert the surgeon of an impending eighth nerve injury. Human clinical observations revealed instances of persistence of the ECoG despite a total eighth nerve section in the cerebellopontine angle. Animal and human experiments were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of ECoG and direct eighth nerve monitoring in hearing preservation. Twelve cats underwent progressive sectioning of the eighth nerve with simultaneous monitoring of changes in their ECoG and direct eighth nerve potentials. ECoG thresholds were obtained intraoperatively in eight patients undergoing surgery for conductive hearing loss. The results of these experiments suggest that recording directly from the eighth nerve is a more accurate technique during cerebellopontine angle and eighth nerve surgery. ECoG, however, appears to have a promising role in the intraoperative monitoring of middle ear reconstruction procedures under general anesthesia.     

人工耳蜗植入术中圆窗耳蜗电图评价耳蜗残余听功能

目的应用术中圆窗耳蜗电图评估极重度感音神经性聋患者耳蜗残余听功能。方法20例患者全麻下人工耳蜗植入手术过程中,行术中圆窗耳蜗电图测试,测出的复合动作电位（CAP）阈值与术前纯音测听或其他听力测试之阈值进行比较。结果20例患者术中圆窗耳蜗电图测试测出的复合动作电位（CAP）阈值与术前1、2、4kHz听力测试阈值分别有较好的相关系数（0．20429,0．04076,0．38163）。结论术中圆窗耳蜗电图可以较准确客观地评估极重度感音神经性聋患者耳蜗残余听功能,且是人工耳蜗植入术前听力学评估方法的有意义的补充。     

Auditory rehabilitation with cochlear implantation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2

Conclusions: New technological developments will most probably improve the efficiency of auditory brainstem implantation (ABI). Meanwhile, cochlear implantation in patients who have undergone prior reductive surgery, and who have maintained a positive electric stimulation, is an excellent alternative for rehabilitating complete and bilateral hearing loss in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2). Auditory results are far better than those reported after ABI. Long-term follow-up will be necessary to demonstrate the validity of this strategy. Objectives: ABIs restore some degree of auditory perception in NF2 patients with bilateral and complete hearing loss, but results are often inadequate for maintaining social and professional activities. The aim of this study was to report the results of auditory rehabilitation by cochlear implantation in three cases of NF2. Patients and methods: This was a retrospective study undertaken in a tertiary referral center. The first patient had undergone previous surgery for a left grade III vestibular schwannoma (VS) and then underwent irradiation for a right grade I VS. Two years after irradiation, he suddenly lost his remaining hearing. Electric promontory stimulation was positive and cochlear implantation was performed. The second patient had undergone surgery for a left grade III VS and followed for a right grade II VS. She suddenly lost her remaining hearing. A cytoreductive surgery was performed and the cochlear nerve was preserved. Postoperative electric stimulation was positive. She was then implanted with a cochlear implant. The third patient presented with a right stage III and a left stage I VS. She first underwent a subtotal removal of the left VS with immediate cochlear implantation. She then underwent removal of the right VS stage III with no possible preservation of the cochlear nerve. Results: All three patients had excellent postoperative speech performance and were back to work 3 months after implantation. Imaging follow-ups at 4, 2, and 1 year, respectively, do not show any evolution of the tumor.     

Intraoperative BAER monitoring and hearing preservation in the treatment of acoustic neuromas

We treated 20 cases of acoustic neuromas in the last 2 1/2 years using the suboccipital approach with intraoperative monitoring of eighth nerve function in an attempt to preserve hearing. Total tumor removal was accomplished in 18 cases. Three tumors were small (less than 2 cm in size); 3 tumors were moderate sized (2 to 3 cm) and 14 tumors were large (greater than 3 cm). In 15 cases, all BAER components were lost during surgery. These patients had no postoperative hearing. In five patients there was intraoperative preservation of some or all BAER components. These included the three patients with small tumors and two other patients with moderate sized tumors. One patient with a moderate size tumor had preservation of wave 1 only, and had no postoperative speech discrimination. One patient with a small tumor retained all 5 BAER components, but had no postoperative hearing. Three patients in our series retained functional hearing after surgery, including 3 of 5 patients with tumors 2 cm or smaller. Intraoperative BAER monitoring appears to be useful in predicting postoperative hearing. Tumor size seems to be the primary factor in preservation of hearing following acoustic neuroma surgery.