Anti-emetic effect and safety of single dose of ondansetron injection in double-blind comparison study with placebo]

In order to make an objective evaluation of anti-emetic effect, safety and usefulness of ondansetron injection in nausea and vomiting associated with cancer chemotherapy, we carried out a double-blind placebo controlled comparative study in patients receiving high-single dose (50 mg/m2 or more) of cisplatin. Either 4 mg of ondansetron or saline injection was given intravenously at 15 min. before administration of cisplatin. If anti-emetic effect of the test drug was insufficient, an additional dose of 4mg of ondansetron was given intravenously, as the rescue medication. Ondansetron was significantly superior to placebo in anti-emetic effect (p < 0.001). Efficacy rates were 66.7% (22/33 cases) in ondansetron and 20.0% (6/30 cases) in placebo groups. Seven and 21 cases required rescue medication with 4 mg single intravenous dose of ondansetron due to insufficiency of anti-emetic effect, in ondansetron group and placebo group, respectively. Thus the number of patients who required rescue medication was obviously greater in placebo group than that in ondansetron group. The rates of inhibitory effect of rescue medication on nausea and emesis were 14.3% (1/7 cases) in ondansetron group and 61.9% (13/21 cases) in placebo group. Side effects were observed in 1 case (eruption) in ondansetron group and in 2 cases (headache, diarrhoea; 1 case each) in placebo group. Furthermore, fever developed in 1 case in placebo group after the rescue medication. Elevation of total bilirubin value was observed in 2 cases in ondansetron group and 1 case in placebo group, however, these changes were mild and did not pose noteworthy clinical problem. From these results, ondansetron was shown to possess an excellent anti-emetic effect on nausea and emesis induced by highly emetogenic anti-cancer drugs, such as cisplatin, and to have no problem in safety, and thus it was considered to be a useful anti-emetic agent.     

Anti-emetic effect and safety of ondansetron tablet in double-blind comparison with placebo]

Ondansetron, a selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, has already been reported to have a marked effect to alleviate or prevent nausea and vomiting associated with cancer chemotherapy, after its intravenous administration. The present study was planned to examine the usefulness of its tablet form, which was prepared for the convenient use in outpatients receiving chemotherapy. In order to make an objective evaluation of anti-emetic effect and safety of ondansetron 4 mg tablet, this study was conducted in double-blind comparison versus placebo in patients receiving cisplatin at a single dose of 50mg/m2 or higher. Either 4 mg of ondansetron or placebo (lactose tablet) was administered orally once at 2 hrs prior to administration of cisplatin. If any satisfactory anti-emetic effects were not obtained, 4 mg of ondansetron injection was given once intravenously as a rescue medication. The inhibitory effect on nausea and vomiting was assessed in 4 grades as "excellent", "good", "fair" and "poor" based on severity of nausea and number of vomiting that occurred during the first 24hrs after administration of cisplatin. When rescue medication was conducted, the case was assessed as "poor". Ondansetron was significantly superior to placebo in inhibition of nausea and vomiting, in which efficacy rates (excellent+good) of ondansetron and placebo groups were 58.1% (25/43 cases) and 16.7% (7/42 cases), respectively. Number of cases requiring rescue medication with ondansetron injection was obviously greater in placebo group (31 cases) than that in ondansetron group (12 cases). In those patients given ondansetron injection as the rescue medication, satisfactory effects were obtained in 5 cases in ondansetron group and in 18 cases in placebo group. Although side effects including chest itching (ondansetron group), headache and dull headache (placebo group) were observed after the rescue medication with ondansetron injection, these symptoms were not severe and disappeared after 1-2 days. As mentioned above, ondansetron tablet was shown to possess excellent anti-emetic effect on nausea and emesis induced by high dose of cisplatin and to have no problem in safety. Hence ondansetron was proven to be clinically very useful anti-emetic.     

Examination of anti-emetic effect and safety of multiple intravenous doses of ondansetron in patients receiving nonplatinum anti-cancer drugs]

Anti-emetic effects, safety and usefulness of Ondansetron given intravenously at 4 mg once daily for consecutive 3-5 days were investigated against nausea and emesis induced by non-platinum anticancer drugs. Efficacy rates in control of nausea and emesis were 59% (20/34 cases) and 68% (23/34 cases), respectively. The efficacy rate for inhibition of nausea and emesis, calculated based on the control of nausea and emesis, was 68% (23/34 cases). Adverse events (headache and constipation) were observed in 1 case and abnormal change in clinical laboratory findings (increase in eosinophil count) in another case. Out of 42 cases in which safety was evaluated, 41 (98%) cases were assessed as "no problem in safety." However, one case with side effect was assessed as a "Minor problem in safety." From the above, it was confirmed that Ondansetron injection exerted excellent inhibitory effects against nausea and emesis induced by non-platinum anti-cancer drugs, and this drug was a highly safe and useful anti-emetic.     

Evaluation of SN-307 (ondansetron), given intravenously for the treatment of nausea and vomiting caused by anticancer drugs including cisplatin-open study]

The anti-emetic effect, safety and clinical usefulness of ondansetron for the treatment of nausea and vomiting caused by anticancer drugs including cisplatin, was evaluated by a multi-institutional study in patients with various malignancies. In this study, ondansetron was given intravenously with mainly a single dose of 4 mg to intervene nausea and vomiting. 1. Efficacy ratio of overall effects on nausea and emesis observed for 24 hours after treatment was 69.8%. 2. No side effect was observed. Laboratory tests showed temporary elevation of serum uric acid level in 1 patient in the group given 4 mg. 3. From these results, it seems that ondansetron, given intravenously after initial vomiting, was highly safe and clinically useful anti-emetic for the treatment of nausea and vomiting associated with anti-cancer drugs.     

Clinical usefulness of ondansetron hydrochloride for nausea and vomiting during repeated courses of chemotherapy for malignant lymphoma--impact of prognosis announcement on anti-emetic effect and evaluation of patient perception of chemotherapy-associated adverse events

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of ondansetron hydrochloride (OND) on nausea and vomiting during repeated courses of CHOP or ACOMP-B therapy in patients with malignant lymphoma. The impact of the prognosis announcement on the anti-emetic effect and chemotherapy-associated adverse events was also investigated. Forty-two subjects with malignant lymphoma who underwent CHOP or ACOMP-B therapy including cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 and adriamycin 40 mg/m2 were investigated for a maximum of 6 courses. For acute nausea and vomiting, ondansetron was injected intravenously before the start of chemotherapy on the first day of each course of chemotherapy. For delayed emesis, ondansetron was administered orally for 4 days from the following day. The efficacy on acute nausea and vomiting was found to be 95.0% (1st course), 95.0% (2nd course), 90.9% (3rd course), 88.2% (4th course), 92.3% (5th course) and 91.7% (6th course), respectively. A high efficacy of > or = 85% was also obtained for delayed nausea and vomiting on each day. Though the adverse event of elevated GPT value developed in one subject. It was mild and resolved. No difference in efficacy was seen with or without announcement of prognosis to patients. Following the investigation on antiemetic effect, patient perception of chemotherapy-induced adverse events was evaluated. The most common event was hair loss, followed by taste abnormality and numbness and hyposthesia of the tips of the fingers. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was the 4th and 5th most common, which are less frequent than in the report of Coates in 1983. In conclusion, ondansetron is considered clinically useful with stable anti-emetic effect on both acute and delayed nausea and vomiting over repeated courses of chemotherapy, without any significant safety problem.     

Examination on efficacy and safety of concurrent use of ondansetron hydrochloride and steroid in lung cancer patients on cisplatin

The anti-emetic effect and safety in patients receiving ondansetron hydrochloride (OND group) and concurrent use of ondansetron and dexamethasone (DEX group) in cases of acute and delayed onset emesis induced by a single high dose of cisplatin, given as a chemotherapy to lung cancer patients, were comparatively studied. The study subjects were 78 lung cancer patients. The OND group received 4 mg of ondansetron via slow intravenous injection on Day 1, 30 minutes prior to cisplatin, and for Days 2 to 5, the subjects orally received 4 mg ondansetron tablet each day. The DEX group received the same dose regimen of ondansetron as the OND group for Days 1-5, but in addition the subjects received dexamethasone injection in doses of 8 mg twice daily on Day 1 and 4 mg (1 mg QID) daily for Days 2-5. An anti-emetic effect against acute nausea and vomiting was achieved in 83.8% of the OND group and in a higher rate of 94.6% of the DEX group. Significantly better efficacy was seen in the DEX group as to the complete suppression rate of nausea and vomiting and the improvement of food intake. The group also achieved better efficacy in delayed onset of emesis. Two cases of adverse reactions (hiccups and elevation of ALT and BUN) were observed in the DEX group; however, since the symptoms were all mild, we did not consider there was any problem in safety. We conclude from the above findings that concurrent administration of ondansetron hydrochloride and dexamethasone is a clinically useful treatment for acute and delayed onset emesis induced by a single high dose of cisplatin given to lung cancer patients.     

Examination on efficacy and safety of concurrent use of ondansetron hydrochloride and steroid in gynecological cancer patients on cisplatin]

The anti-emetic effect and safety in patients receiving ondansetron hydrochloride (OND group) and ondansetron and dexamethasone (DEX group) concurrently in cases of acute and delayed onset emesis induced by a single high dose of cisplatin, given as a chemotherapy to gynecological cancer patients, were comparatively studied. The study subjects were 139 gynecological cancer patients. The OND group received 4 mg of ondansetron via slow intravenous injection on Day 1, 30 minutes prior to cisplatin, and for Days 2 to 5, the subjects orally received 4 mg ondansetron tablet each day. The DEX group received the same dose regimen of ondansetron as the OND group for Days 1-5, but in addition the subjects received dexamethasone injection in doses of 8 mg twice daily on Day 1 and 4 mg (1 mg QID) daily for Days 2-5. An anti-emetic effect against acute nausea and vomiting was achieved in 47.9% of the OND group and in a higher rate of 84.2% of the DEX group. Significantly better efficacy was seen in the DEX group also in the complete suppression rate of nausea and vomiting and the improvement of food intake. The group also achieved better efficacy in delayed onset of emesis. Adverse reactions were observed in 2 cases (2 reports of headache) in the OND group and 5 cases (2 reports of hiccups, 2 headache, 2 diarrhea, one constipation, one hot facial flushes and one elevation of gamma-GTP) in the DEX group; however, since the symptoms were all mild, we did not consider there was any problem in safety. We conclude from the above findings that concurrent administration of ondansetron hydrochloride and dexamethasone is a clinically useful treatment for acute and delayed onset emesis induced by a single high dose of cisplatin given to gynecological cancer patients.     

Examination of anti-emetic effect, safety and usefulness of single oral dose of ondansetron tablet in nausea and emesis induced by anti-cancer drugs--dose-finding study of ondansetron tablet in patients receiving non-platinum anti-cancer drugs]

Inhibitory effects on acute nausea and emesis, safety and usefulness of a single oral dose of Ondansetron tablet were evaluated in 3 different dose levels for comparison by telephone registration system, in patients receiving non-platinum anti-cancer drugs. A single dose of ondansetron at 4 mg, 8 mg or 12 mg was given orally at 2 hrs before the initial administration of anti-cancer drugs. The patients were observed for 24 hours after administration of anti-cancer drugs, for occurrence of nausea and emesis. Efficacy rates of inhibitory effects on nausea and emesis were 83.3% (10/12 cases) in 4 mg dose group, 78.6% (11/14 cases) in 8 mg dose group and 84.6% (11/13 cases) in 12 mg dose group, without statistically significant difference. Side effects were observed in 3 cases (headache, cold feeling and trembling in limbs, sleepiness) in 12 mg dose group, but these symptoms were not severe and disappeared after several hours or several days. No abnormality in clinical laboratory findings attributable to Ondansetron was observed. From the above, it was considered that Ondansetron was a clinically useful anti-emetic for nausea and emesis induced by non-platinum anti-cancer drugs and that 4 mg once daily was the optimal dose.     

Investigation of anti-emetic effect of ondansetron tablet in multiple doses on nausea and emesis associated with cisplatin]

The anti-emetic effects, safety and usefulness of ondansetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, given orally once daily for 3-5 consecutive days, were investigated in patients receiving a high single dose (greater than or equal to 50 mg/m2 or 75 mg/body) or lower multiple doses (greater than or equal to 15-20 mg/m2/day for 3-5 consecutive days) of cisplatin. Ondansetron 4 mg was administered orally once daily for 3-5 consecutive days. Efficacy rates in controlling nausea and emesis over the 3-5 days were 77.3% (17/22 cases) and 66.7% (6/9 cases) in patients receiving a high single dose and lower multiple doses of cisplatin, respectively. Side effects were observed in 2 cases (headache and elevation of blood pressure in one case and only headache in the other case.). Abnormality in clinical laboratory findings was observed in 1 case. From the above, ondansetron, showing high efficacy by oral administration 4 mg once daily for 3-5 consecutive days, without any problem in safety, was considered to be a useful anti-emetic agent.     

Anti-emetic effect and safety of consecutive use of ondansetron injection in cisplatin-induced nausea and emesis]

Anti-emetic effect, safety and clinical usefulness of Ondansetron injection given in the dose of 4 mg once daily by intravenous administration for 3-5 consecutive days were examined in patients receiving a high single dose (not less than 50 mg/m2 or over 75 mg/body) and lower multiple doses (over 15-20 mg/m2 once daily, for 3-5 consecutive days) of cisplatin. Efficacy rates of inhibitory effects on nausea and emesis in patients receiving the high single dose of cisplatin were 76% on the 1st day, 67% on the 2nd day and 78% on the 3rd day, the average being 71% (86/121 cases) for the 3 days. Those in patients receiving lower multiple doses of cisplatin were 83% on the 1st day, 78% on the 2nd day, 61% on the 3rd day, 65% on the 4th day and 57% on the 5th day, the average being 72% (13/18 cases) for the 3-5 days. Side effects were observed in 15 cases out of 207 (1st course, 182 cases; 2nd course, 21 cases; 3rd course, 4 cases), and major symptoms were headache and fever. Also, abnormalities in clinical laboratory findings attributable to Ondansetron were observed in 13 cases, mainly consisting of elevation of the hepatic function values. From the above, Ondansetron injection which showed sufficient anti-emetic effects on acute emesis and delayed emesis induced by a high single dose or lower multiple doses of cisplatin with its once daily intravenous dose given for 3-5 consecutive days, were considered a safe and clinically useful anti-emetic.     

A comparison of ondansetron with alizapride plus methylprednisolone in the control of cisplatin-induced emesis. The French Pneumology Group for the Ondansetron Study.

This randomised, single-blind, parallel-group study was carried out in 48 French pneumology centres to compare the anti-emetic efficacy of ondansetron and an alizapride plus methylprednisolone (ALI/MPS) combination in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin. A total of 220 patients were recruited of whom 209 were evaluable (100 on ondansetron and 109 on ALI/MPS). Thirty minutes before cisplatin, patients received either ondansetron (8 mg i.v.) or alizapride (4 mg/kg i.v.) combined with methylprednisolone (500 mg i.v.). The ondansetron and alizapride injections were repeated 4 and 8 h later. Thereafter, patients received oral ondansetron (8 mg) or alizapride (50 mg) 3 times daily for 5 days. Ondansetron was significantly superior to ALI/MPS in the control of acute emesis (p less than 0.001); 88/100 (88%) of ondansetron, and 69/109 (63%) of ALI/MPS patients experienced less than 3 emetic episodes. Similarly, ondansetron was superior to ALI/MPS for the control of acute nausea (visual analogue scale at 24 h; 13 vs. 22 mm respectively, p = 0.0012). The superiority of ondansetron over days 2-6 was not as great as that over the first 24 h, although there was a trend in favour of ondansetron. More patients treated with ondansetron wished to take the same anti-emetic treatment again (83% for ondansetron vs. 56% for ALI/MPS, p less than 0.001). Both treatments were well tolerated. This study shows that ondansetron is superior to a benzamide-corticosteroid combination in the control of acute cisplatin-induced emesis.     

Antagonism of serotonin S3 receptors with ondansetron prevents nausea and emesis induced by cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy regimens

The control of nausea and emesis in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy poses a significant management problem. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we evaluated the effect of serotonin S3 receptor blockade with ondansetron (GR 38032F) on the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy. Cyclophosphamide was given in doses of 500 to 600 mg/m2 and ondansetron as three intravenous (IV) doses of 0.15 mg/kg. Most patients had breast cancer. Cyclophosphamide was given in combination with doxorubicin (65% of patients) or with fluorouracil (85% of patients: 50% with Adriamycin [doxorubicin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH] and 35% with methotrexate). All placebo-treated patients experienced vomiting, whereas 70% of patients treated with ondansetron did not vomit (P = .008). Median nausea scores were 8 mm on ondansetron and 65 mm on placebo (P less than .001). Seventy percent of patients treated with ondansetron retained their normal appetite, compared with 10% of placebo patients. Adverse events occurred in six placebo patients and one ondansetron patient. Diarrhea and headache were the most common events, both occurring more frequently in the placebo group. There were no extrapyramidal reactions, and the only significant biochemical change occurred in a placebo-treated patient. These results suggest that serotonin S3 receptor antagonists represent a novel, effective, and safe mode of therapy for nausea and emesis induced by cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapies. In addition, our observations are compatible with the view that serotonin, acting on S3 receptors, mediates the nausea and emesis occurring after cyclophosphamide chemotherapy.     

A comparison of ondansetron with metoclopramide in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: A randomized,double-blind study

The efficacy of ondansetron was compared with metoclopramide in the prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting induced by cyclophosphamide ≥ 500 mg/m² in combination with doxorubicin ≥ 40 mg/m² or epirubicin ≥ 40 mg/m². Complete anti-emetic protection in the 24 h following chemotherapy was achieved in 26 of 40 (65%) patients treated with ondansetron compared with 17 of 42 (41%) patients treated with metoclopramide. Severe nausea was present in 3% of patients in the ondansetron group and 31% in the metoclopramide group. A worst day analysis of control of emesis and nausea on days 2 and 3 following chemotherapy also demonstrated ondansetron to be more effective than metoclopramide. Both treatments were well tolerated. Ondansetron is more effective as an anti-emetic than metoclopramide in this type of cytostatic therapy.     

Evaluation of SN-307 (ondansetron), given intravenously in the treatment of nausea and vomiting caused by anticancer drugs including cisplatin--a placebo-controlled, double-blind comparative study]

Clinical usefulness of ondansetron as an antiemetic for the treatment of nausea and vomiting induced by anticancer drugs including cisplatin (> or = 50 mg/m2) was evaluated by a multi-institutional, double-blind comparative study with placebo with inpatients with various malignancies. In this study, efficacy, safety and usefulness of single dose of ondansetron (4 mg) or placebo (physiological saline), given intravenously for initial nausea and vomiting were observed for 24 hours after treatment. Clinically, very effective or effective response was seen in 64% (16/25) of the group O (ondansetron) and 5.9% (1/17) of the group P (placebo). No clinically significant adverse effects or abnormal laboratory test values were reported in the group of O. Diarrhea (1 case) and the elevation of laboratory test values (GOT.GPT, T-bilirubin, LDH, in 3 cases) were reported in the group of P. General safety assessment was considered "safe" in 100% of both group O and group P, and there was no statistical difference between two groups. Usefulness was considered as "useful" in 64% (16/25) of group O and 6.3% (1/16) of group P, and O was significantly better than group P (p < 0.001) level. In conclusion, ondansetron provides a safe and effective antiemetic measure when employed therapeutically against nausea and vomiting induced by regimens including cisplatin.     

Ondansetron versus metoclopramide in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting - a metaanalysis

Nausea and vomiting remain important clinical problems occuring in 25 to 50% of patients receiving chemotherapy for cancer. Clinical trials comparing a new antiemetic drug, ondansetron, to metoclopramide have suggested improved control of nausea and vomiting but studies disagree on the magnitude of the treatment effect and its statistical significance. We combined evidence from randomized controlled trials in a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of ondansetron compared to metoclopramide in the prevention of acute (less-than-or-equal-to 24 hours) nausea and emesis associated with chemotherapy. Literature search identified six randomised controlled trials of ondansetron versus metoclopramide in an adult population. Study outcomes were the observed incidence of emesis (vomiting or retching) and patient-reponed grades of nausea after chemotherapy. For meta-analysis of each outcome we defined therapeutic success as complete protection (ie. zero episodes during 24 hours following chemotherapy). The relative odds of success (ondansetron/metoclopramide) was calculated for each trial and all trials combined. Results were expressed as a relative risk (RR) for zero emesis or nausea at 24 hours. The six trials reported on 705 patients (median age range 53-59 years; 57% female). Relative odds for complete control of emesis was greater than one in all trials but was nonsignificant (p>0.05) in two trials, including the largest trial. When trials were combined, summary odds ratios for control of emesis and nausea were greater than one (p<0.05). RR of zero emesis with ondansetron was 1.72 (95% CI 1.45 to 1.97) and was similar for nausea (RR= 1.78, 95% CI 1.39 to 2.13). In trials using high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy, higher rates of extrapyramidal affects and diarrhea were associated with metoclopramide (p<0.05) while headache was frequently associated with ondansetron (p<0.05). Combined clinical trial evidence supports the conclusion. that, relative to metoclopramide, ondansetron places patients at a much lower risk of nausea and emesis following chemotherapy with moderately or highly emetogenic regimens.     

Incidence of emesis in outpatients on chemotherapy for breast cancer and the clinical efficacy of ondansetron hydrochloride tablets

The incidence of nausea and vomiting was investigated for a maximum of 7 days in 32 breast cancer patients receiving CAF (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, 5-fluorouracil) and CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) therapies. For those patients who experienced nausea and vomiting, 4 mg/day of ondansetron hydrochloride (OND) in tablet form was given in the next course of the chemotherapy, and the anti-emetic effect of the drug was examined. During the observation period, nausea was seen in 17.2-50.0% of the patients and vomiting in 3.1-15.6%. The number of patients who had nausea and vomiting was 22. The anti-emetic effect was examined in 18 out of 22 cases with nausea and vomiting. An anti-emetic effect based on the judgement criterion (efficacy rate) was seen in 94.4% or more of patients for all the days of observation. A marked effect was seen in higher proportion of patients. In conclusion, nausea and vomiting occurred in 17.2-50.0% of the breast cancer patients on chemotherapy (CAF and CMF therapies). To improve the QOL of those patients, anti-emetic treatment using OND tablets as necessary is considered to be effective.     

A randomised placebo controlled study with ondansetron in patients undergoing fractionated radiotherapy

BACKGROUND:: There are few randomised studies comparing anti-emetic drugsfor the prevention of nausea and vomiting in patients treatedwith fractionated radiotherapy. The aim of the study was tocompare the anti-emetic efficacy of 8 mg dose ondansetron twicea day with placebo. MATERIALS AND METHODS:: One hundred eleven patients who were to commence a course of10 or more daily fractionated radiotherapy including the abdomenwere included in the study. The patients recorded daily emesis,nausea and bowel habit and graded weekly symptoms of nausea,vomiting, diarrhoea and lack of appetite. The EORTC C30 questionnairewas completed. RESULTS:: 67% of patients given ondansetron had complete control of emesiscompared with 45% of patients with placebo (P <0.05). Thenumber of emetic episodes recorded on the worst day was 1.4for the ondansetron group and 3.1 for the placebo group (P <0.01).Patients given ondansetron had fewer days with emesis and nauseacompared with placebo (P <0.05). The mean sum score of patientsweekly grading of symptoms showed that the ondansetron grouphad less inconvenience than the placebo group (P <0.05).This difference persisted during the first three weeks, butnot thereafter. Similarly, some quality of life measures showedsignificant differences in favour of the ondansetron group.More patients (n = 13) withdrew due to lack of efficacy in theplacebo group compared with patients (n = 8) in the ondansetrongroup. CONCLUSION:: The present study illustrates that prophylactic anti-emeticadministration of ondansetron is effective in preventing nauseaand vomiting in patients undergoing fractionated radiotherapyof the abdomen. diarrhoea, emcsis, fractionated radiotherapy, ondansetron, quality of life     

Clinical evaluation of ondansetron (injection of a single intravenous dose) against nausea and emesis associated with anti-cancer drugs--dose-finding study in patients receiving cisplatin]

We examined anti-emetic effects, safety and the optimal dose of Ondansetron Injection given in a single intravenous dose in patients receiving a single high dose of cisplatin in randomized controlled comparative study using telephone registration. Ondansetron was injected intravenously in a single dose of 4 mg, 8 mg or 12 mg, at 15 minutes before administration of cisplatin. Nausea and emesis were observed for 24 hours after administration of cisplatin. Efficacy rate of inhibitory effects on nausea and emesis were 76% (19/25 cases) in the 4 mg dose group, 57% (12/21 cases) in the 8 mg dose group and 83% (20/24 cases) in the 12 mg dose group, without a statistically significant difference among 3 dose groups. Hence, it was estimated that the low dose of 4 mg was adequate to exert satisfactory anti-emetic effects. No clear relationship between onset time of the initial emetic episode and plasma concentrations of Ondansetron was found in 16 cases of the 4 mg dose group, 11 cases in the 8 mg dose group and 15 cases in the 12 mg dose group. Side effects observed during this study period were headache and diarrhea in 1 case in the 12 mg dose group. Both symptoms were mild and resolved without treatment. No abnormal findings attributable to Ondansetron were observed in clinical laboratory test. From the above, it was considered that Ondansetron given by a single intravenous injection was highly effective to inhibit nausea and emesis induced by cisplatin, and was highly safe. As to the dose, 4 mg once daily was considered to be adequate for prophylaxis of cisplatin-induced nausea and emesis.     

枢复宁防止由非顺铂化疗所致呕吐的疗效观察

本文报道用枢复宁十地塞米松与灭吐灵十地塞米松随机对照,控制非顺铂化疗诱发的呕吐。58例病人经随机分组后,28例用枢复宁加地塞米松,30例按本院常用剂量灭吐灵加地塞米松治疗。枢复宁十地塞米松对急性恶心和呕吐的完全控制率均显著高于灭吐灵十地塞米松(分别为87％比72％,P<0.05,94％比67％,P<0.001)。对延缓性呕吐的完全控制。枢复宁十地塞米松也高于灭吐灵十地塞米松,分别为85％—94％比58％—82％(P<0.05)。枢复宁十地塞米松副作用轻,主要有头痛(13％)和便秘(9％),不引起锥体外系反应。因此,枢复宁十地塞米松是一个较为有效的联合止吐方案。