The epidemic of aging in renal replacement therapy: an update on elderly patients and their outcomes

BACKGROUND: In the past 2 decades, a rapid growth has occurred in the number of patients over 65 years of age accepted for renal replacement therapy (RRT) with an increasing need for dialysis resources as a consequence. The aim of this study is to describe the trends in incidence, treatment and outcome of RRT of these elderly patients included in the new ERA-EDTA Registry database. METHODS: Data from 6 national renal registries have been included for the period 1985 - 1999, comprising data of 18,920 elderly patients starting RRT. We used Cox-proportional hazards regression to predict patient and technique survival. RESULTS: The incidence and prevalence of RRT showed a 4- to 5-fold increase over the period, resulting in 48% of the new patients being older than 65 years in 1999. However, the rates varied considerably between countries. The 2-year patient survival was 51% in dialysis patients. Mortality due to social causes increased with age. Multivariate analysis showed no change with time in patient survival on dialysis, but the risk of death following a first renal allograft between 1995 and 1999 was reduced by 31%, compared with the 1985 - 1989 time period (RR 0.69; 95% CI: 0.54 - 0.90). The relative risk of peritoneal dialysis technique failure was more than doubled in the 1995 - 1999 cohort compared to the 1985 - 1989 cohort (RR 2.38; 95% CI: 1.89 - 3.01), with the highest technique failure rate in the first 2 years of the 1995 - 1999 cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The number of elderly patients receiving RRT is rising rapidly. Patient survival on dialysis has been stable over the last 15 years, whereas transplant outcome has improved. The increased peritoneal dialysis technique failure and the high mortality due to social causes in the elderly age groups require further investigation. The challenge of the years ahead is to provide this life-prolonging therapy to all patients who need it in such a way that it improves quality of life and at a cost that a society can afford.     

Renal replacement therapy in children: data from 12 registries in Europe

In June 2000 the ERA-EDTA Registry office moved to Amsterdam and started collecting core data on renal replacement therapy (RRT) entirely through national and regional registries. This paper reports the pediatric data from 12 registries. The analysis comprised 3,184 patients aged less than 20 years and starting RRT between 1980 and the end of 2000. The incidence of RRT rose from 7.1 per million of age-related population (pmarp) in the 1980–1984 cohort to 9.9 pmarp in the 1985–1989 cohort, and remained stable thereafter. The prevalence increased from 22.9 pmarp in 1980 to 62.1 in 2000. Hemodialysis was the commonest form of treatment at the start of dialysis, but peritoneal dialysis gained popularity during the late 1980s. Pre-emptive transplantation accounted for 18% of the first treatment modality in the 1995–2000 cohort. The relative risk of death of patients starting dialysis in the period 1995–2000 was reduced by 36% {adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41–1.00]} and that of those receiving a first allograft by 42% [AHR 0.58 (95% CI 0.34–1.00)], compared with patients in the period 1980–1984. The prevalence of RRT in children has continued to rise, while its incidence has been stable for about 15 years. Patient survival has improved in both dialysis patients and transplant recipients. The development of this pediatric registry will form the basis for more-detailed and focused studies in the future.     

The 2008 ERA-EDTA Registry Annual Report-a précis

Background. This study provides a summary of the 2008 ERA-EDTA Registry Report (this report is available at www.era-edta-reg.org).Methods. The data on renal replacement therapy (RRT) were available from 55 national and regional registries in 30 countries in Europe and bordering the Mediterranean Sea. Datasets with individual patient data were received from 36 registries, whereas 19 registries contributed data in aggregated form. We presented incidence and prevalence of RRT, and transplant rates. Survival analysis was solely based on individual patient records.Results. In 2008, the overall incidence rate of RRT for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) among all registries reporting to the ERA-EDTA Registry was 122 per million population (pmp), and the prevalence was 644?pmp. Incidence rates varied from 264?pmp in Turkey to 15?pmp in Ukraine. The mean age of patients starting RRT in 2008 ranged from 69?years in Dutch-speaking Belgium to 44?years in Ukraine. The highest prevalence of RRT for ESRD was reported by Portugal (1408?pmp) and the lowest by Ukraine (89?pmp). The prevalence of haemodialysis on 31 December 2008 ranged from 66?pmp (Ukraine) to 875?pmp (Portugal) and the prevalence of peritoneal dialysis from 8?pmp (Montenegro) to 115?pmp (Denmark). In Norway, 70% of the patients on RRT on 31 December 2008 were living with a functioning graft (572?pmp). In 2008, the number of transplants performed pmp was highest in Spain (Catalonia) (64?pmp), whereas the highest transplant rates with living-donor kidneys were reported from the Netherlands (25?pmp) and Norway (21?pmp). In the cohort 1999-2003, the unadjusted 1-, 2- and 5-year survival of patients on RRT was 80.8% (95% CI: 80.6-81.0), 69.1% (95% CI: 68.9-69.3) and 46.1% (95% CI: 45.9-46.3), respectively.     

Renal replacement therapy for diabetic end-stage renal disease: data from 10 registries in Europe (1991-2000)

BACKGROUND: There is concern about the rising prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus and of the resultant nephropathy. This study uses data from the European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA) Registry to provide information on the epidemiology and outcome of renal replacement therapy (RRT) for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) due to diabetic nephropathy (DN). METHODS: Data from the following 10 registries: Austria, French-speaking Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Greece, Norway, Scotland (UK), Catalonia (Spain), Sweden, and The Netherlands were combined. Average annual changes (%) were estimated by Poisson regression. Analyses of mortality were performed by Cox regression. RESULTS: An increase in patients with type 2 DN entering RRT has been observed (+11.9% annually, P < 0.05), while large differences in RRT incidence in this disease continue to exist between countries in Europe. There was a reduction in mortality during the first 2 years on dialysis therapy among patients with type 2 DN (AHR 0.96, 95%CI 0.94-0.97 annually). The mortality among transplant recipients decreased for both type 1 DN and nondiabetic ESRD (non DN) within the 1995-1998 cohort (type 1 DN: AHR 0.49, 95% CI 0.35-0.68; non DN: AHR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.90) compared to the 1991-1994 cohort. CONCLUSION: This report has shown that during the last decade there has been a marked increase in the incidence of RRT for type 2 DN. Survival analysis showed that over the period 1991-1999 the mortality rates of all dialysis patients and of type 1 diabetic and nondiabetic renal transplant recipients have fallen.     

The ERA-EDTA cohort study--comparison of methods to predict survival on renal replacement therapy.

BACKGROUND: Accurate prediction of patient survival from the time of starting renal replacement therapy (RRT) is desirable, but previously published predictive models have low accuracy. We have attempted to overcome limitations of previous studies by conducting an ambidirectional inception cohort study in patients on RRT from centres throughout Europe. A conventional multivariate regression (MVR) model, a self-learning rule-based model (RBM) and a simple co-morbidity score [the Charlson score modified for renal disease (MCS)] were compared. METHODS: In 1996, all 3640 dialysis centres registered with the ERA-EDTA were invited to identify all patients on RRT for end-stage renal failure (ESRF) who died during the 28 days of February 1997 (training cohort) and all patients who started RRT in the same period (validation cohort). Fifty-four clinical and laboratory variables from the time of starting RRT were collected in both cohorts using a two-page questionnaire. The data from the training cohort were given to statisticians at the Amsterdam Academic Medical Centre to create the MVR model and to engineers in Strathclyde University to create the RBM. They were then given the baseline data from patients in the validation cohort to predict how long each patient would survive. Follow-up questionnaires were sent to the centre of each patient in the validation cohort to determine actual survival. RESULTS: A total of 2310 patients from 793 centres in 37 countries in the ERA-EDTA area were used to construct and validate the models. For predicting 1-year survival, the RBM had the highest positive predictive value (PPV) (84.2%), the MVR model had the highest negative predictive value (NPV) (47%) and the RBM had the highest likelihood ratio (1.59). For predicting 5-year survival, the MCS had the highest PPV (79.4%), the RBM had the highest NPV (74.3%) and the MCS had the highest likelihood ratio (7.0). The proportion of explained variance in survival for MCS, MVR and RBM was 14.6, 12.9 and 3.95%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Using the ambidirectional inception cohort design of this ERA-EDTA Registry survey, we have been able to create and validate two novel instruments to predict survival in patients starting RRT and compare them with a simple scoring model. The models tended to predict 5-year survival with more accuracy than 1-year survival. Examples of potential applications include informing clinical decision making about the likely benefit of starting RRT and listing for transplantation, adjusting for baseline risk in comparative studies and identifying specific risk groups to participate in clinical trials.     

Confounding effect of comorbidity in survival studies in patients on renal replacement therapy.

BACKGROUND: After taking other confounding factors into account, the impact of comorbidity on mortality was investigated when comparing mortality between five European countries, dialysis modalities and renal disease groups. METHODS: The study included 15 571 incident patients on renal replacement therapy (RRT) from five national or regional registries participating in the European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association Registry that collect comorbidity data. The presence of diabetes mellitus, ischaemic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease and malignancy was recorded at the start of RRT. RESULTS: The comorbidities were each independently associated with mortality, with hazard ratios (HRs) ranging from 1.40 (95% CI: 1.30-1.51) for peripheral vascular disease to 1.65 (95% CI: 1.48-1.83) for diabetes. Age, gender, primary renal disease, modality and country together explained 14.4% of the variance in mortality; the comorbidities explained an additional 1.9%. In the comparison of renal vascular disease with glomerulonephritis, the crude HR of 2.40 (95% CI: 2.12-2.72) changed to 1.24 (95% CI: 1.09-1.41) after adjustment for age, gender, primary renal disease, treatment modality and country and to 1.06 (95% CI: 0.93-1.22) after further adjustment for the comorbidities. For the comparison between countries and other patient groups, the change in the survival estimate after adjustment for comorbidity was less. CONCLUSION: Comorbidity is an important predictor for mortality. However, after adjustment for age, gender, primary renal disease, treatment modality and country, when comparing outcomes between patient groups the influence of comorbidity may be less important than expected.     

Deaths within 90 days from starting renal replacement therapy in the ERA-EDTA Registry between 1990 and 1992.

BACKGROUND: Patients who die within 90 days of commencing renal replacement therapy (RRT) may be recorded by some centres and not others, and hence data on mortality and survival may not be comparable. However, it is essential to compare like with like when analysing differences between modalities, centres and registries. It was decided, therefore, to look at the incidence of deaths within 90 days in the ERA-EDTA Registry, and to try to define the characteristics of this group of patients. METHODS: Between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 1992, 78 534 new patients started RRT in 28 countries affiliated to the ERA-EDTA Registry. Their mean age was 54 years and 31% were over 65 years old. Eighty-two per cent of the patients received haemodialysis (HD), 16% peritoneal dialysis (PD) and 2% had preemptive transplantation as first mode of treatment. RESULTS: From January 1990 to March 1993 the overall incidence of deaths was 19% and 4% of all patients died within 90 days from the start of RRT. Among those dying within 90 days 59% were over 65 years compared to 53% over 65 years in those dying beyond this time (P<0.0001). The modality of RRT did not influence the distribution of deaths before and after 90 days. Vascular causes and malignancy were more common in those dying after 90 days, while there were more cardiac and social causes among the early deaths. Mortality from social causes was twice as common in the elderly, who had a significantly higher chance of dying from social causes within 90 days compared to those aged under 65 years. The overall incidence of deaths within 90 days was 3.9% but there was a wide variation between countries, from 1.8% to 11.4%. Finally, patient survival at 2 years was markedly influenced in different age groups when deaths within 90 days were taken into account. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of deaths within 90 days from the start of RRT was 3.9%, with a marked variation between countries ranging from 1.8% to 11.4%, which probably reflects mainly differences in reporting these deaths, although variable selection criteria for RRT may contribute. Deaths within 90 days were significantly more frequent in elderly patients with more early deaths resulting from cardiac and social causes, while vascular causes of death and malignancy were more common in those dying after 90 days. Patient survival analyses should take into account deaths within 90 days from the start of RRT, particularly when comparing results between modalities, countries and registries.     

Renal replacement therapy in the Canary Islands: demographic and survival analysis

BACKGROUND: The continuous increase in the number of patients on renal replacement therapy (RRT) has heightened the importance of renal patient registries to respond to the demand for data on the state of health, quality and cost of care provided for these patients. Our aim was to analyze the epidemiological profile of this population in the Canary Islands. METHODS: All patients on RRT between January 1999 and December 2003 were considered in this analysis. The information was obtained from the database of the Canary Registry of Renal Patients. RESULTS: We observed a continuous increase in incidence throughout the study period (from 138 per million population (pmp) in 1999 to 160 pmp in 2003), being more evident in patients >65 yrs. Prevalence followed a similar course, increasing from 875 to 972 pmp, being especially evident in the 65-74 yr age group. An alarming finding was the high incidence (43.5%) and prevalence (37.5%) of diabetic nephropathy. While the proportion of hemodialysis (HD) or transplant patients increased, that of peritoneal dialysis (PD) remained low and stable (prevalence of 5% in 2003). Almost half the RRT patients had functioning grafts, with a notably high rate of 58 transplants pmp in 2003, and a prevalence of 425 pmp. Age (hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (95% CI)] 1.04 [1.03-1.05]; p < 0.001) and diabetic nephropathy (1.47 [1.19-1.82]; p < 0.001) were independently associated with mortality in dialysis patients. Those returning to dialysis after graft loss had a 69% greater risk of death than incident dialysis patients (1.69 [1.06-2.69]; p = 0.026). Cardiovascular events were the main cause of death in all dialysis modalities. Patient death was the main cause of graft loss. CONCLUSIONS: The most outstanding finding was the high incidence and prevalence of patients on RRT, mainly due to diabetic nephropathy. Renal transplant rates were among the highest reported in renal patient registries.     

Nephrology and renal replacement therapy in Romania--transition still continues (Cinderella story revisited).

INTRODUCTION. This report describes the current status of nephrology and renal replacement therapy (RRT) in Romania, a country with previously limited facilities, highlighting national changes in the European context. METHODS: Trends in RRT development were analysed in 2003, on a national basis, using the same questionnaires as in previous surveys (1991, 1995). Survival data and prognostic risk factors were calculated retrospectively from a large representative sample of 2284 patients starting RRT between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2001 (44% of the total RRT population investigated). RESULTS: In 2003, RRT incidence [128 per million population (p.m.p.)] and prevalence (250 p.m.p.) were six and five times higher, respectively, than in 1995. The annual rate of increase in the stock of RRT patients (11%) was supported mainly by an exponential development of the continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) population (+600%), while the haemodialysis (HD) growth rate was stable (+33%) and renal transplantation made a marginal contribution. Renal care infrastructure followed the same trend: nephrology departments (+100%) and nephrologists (+205%). The characteristics of RRT incident patients changed accordingly to current European epidemiology (increasing age and prevalence of diabetes and nephroangiosclerosis). The estimated overall survival of RRT patients in Romania was 90.6% at 1 year [confidence interval (CI) 89.4-91.8] and 62.2% at 5 years (CI 59.4-65.0). Patients' survival was negatively influenced (Cox regression analysis) by age >65 years (P < 0.001), lack of pre-dialysis monitoring by a nephrologist [P = 0.01, hazards ratio (HR) = 0.8], severe anaemia, lack of erythropoetin treatment (P < 0.001, HR = 0.6), and co-morbidity, e.g. cardiovascular diseases (P < 0.001, HR = 1.8) and diabetes mellitus (P < 0.001, HR = 2.2). CONCLUSIONS: Although the rate of increase in RRT patient stock in 1996-2003 in Romania was the highest in Europe, the prevalence remained below the European mean. As CAPD had the greatest expansion, followed by HD, an effective transplantation programme must be set up to overcome the imbalance. The quality of RRT appears to be good and survival was similar to that in other registries. Further evolution implies strategies of prevention, based on national surveys, supported by the Romanian Renal Registry.     

Improved survival in renal replacement therapy in Europe between 1975 and 1992. An ERA-EDTA Registry study.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT) is rising steadily, worldwide and in Europe. One reason for this is an increasing number of patients starting RRT, but improving survival on RRT may also be contributing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In an ERA-EDTA Registry study we have examined survival of patients with Standard Primary Renal Disease, or Diabetes, aged 20 to 75 years, who started RRT with haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) between 1975 and 1992. Altogether close to a quarter of a million patients were included in the analysis which included conventional survival analysis of comparable subgroups of the whole cohort as well as Cox regression. RESULTS: After accounting for age, mode of initial treatment, and diagnosis, an improvement in survival of RRT patients was evident. From Cox regression it was calculated the risk for death decreased by about 5% annually during the time period 1975 1992. Patients who started RRT using PD experienced a higher mortality than those starting with HD. According to Cox regression the relative risk ratio for death was 1.25 for the whole period. The difference in survival between patients starting with PD or HD diminished during the observation period (1975-1992). DISCUSSION: The survival prospects of a patient presenting with end stage renal disease were considerably better in the early 1990s compared to the mid 1970s. This is reassuring despite the fact that mortality on RRT remains high. The higher mortality of RRT patients who started with PD is probably an 'historical' observation as the techniques of this treatment modality have improved considerably since the 1980s which was the time period from which came most of the data for the analysis.     

Machine-generated bicarbonate dialysate for continuous therapy: a prospective, observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: In 1995, we described the technique of adapting a haemodialysis (HD) machine to produce a composition-adjustable, bicarbonate-based fluid (as our primary source for dialysate) for continuous HD in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with acute renal failure (ARF). The following studies the clinical effects, biochemical changes and economic costs of this practice in a large cohort of patients at a single centre over the last 10 years. METHODS: The CCF-ARF Support Registry (1995-2001) was used to identify 405 patients initially supported with bicarbonate continuous HD. The registry is a prospective, observational cohort database that captures demographic, dialysis therapy, laboratory and outcome data. All supported ARF patients were recorded from 1995-98, and then one in five patients from 1999 to 2001. We also reviewed records of the individual dialysis procedures, dialysate disposal, dialysate monitoring tests and specific costs. RESULTS: Continuous HD was performed for 1292 +/- 587 days from 1994 to 2004. Demographics [age 59.57 +/- 14.41 years, weight 84.2 +/- 24 kg, male 65%, chronic kidney disease (CKD) 34%] and ICU mortality (60.5%) were comparable to other reported series. Day 4 solute [BUN 52.3 mg/dl (95% CI 49.6-54.9), creatinine 2.79 mg/dl (95% CI 2.64-2.95)], electrolyte and acid-base balance [bicarbonate 24.12 mmol/l (95% CI 23.7-24.6)] were well controlled. Dialysate monitoring revealed no positive cultures or elevated endotoxin levels. Variable-composition dialysate was achieved and delivered to all patients without adverse consequences. The cost of dialysate actually declined over time (1995 = $0.91/l, 2005 = $0.67/l). CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that ICU ARF patients can be safely, effectively and economically supported with continuous HD using this source.     

Regional variability in the incidence of end-stage renal disease: an epidemiological approach.

BACKGROUND: Regional variability in the incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in Austria is reported. Our aim was to investigate the reason for low rates in the state of Tyrol. METHODS: ESRD incidence data were obtained from the Austrian Dialysis and Transplantation Registry. Additional sources were two health interview surveys, the Hospital Discharge Registry, the Mortality Registry and the Drug Wholesale Registry. RESULTS: Between 1995 and 1999, 4811 new cases of ESRD were recorded; the state of Tyrol (T) had a mean annual, age-adjusted incidence of 97.9/1 000 000 population [95% confidence interval (CI) 86.9-109.1], a number significantly lower than that for the rest of Austria [(RA), 120.9 (95% CI 116.9-124.5); P < 0.001]. This was due mainly to a difference in the incidence of ESRD patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus [(DM-2) T = 12.2 (95% CI 8.2-16.2) vs RA = 28.9 (95% CI 27.2-30.6); P < 0.001]. When these patients were excluded, the difference in the overall ESRD incidence disappeared. When data from various registries were analysed for the prevalence of DM, a highly significant correlation was found between ESRD incidence and DM. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the variability in the ESRD incidence in Austria is explained mainly by regional differences in DM-2. Data from similar studies might be useful for predictions concerning resource allocation for ESRD programmes in the future.     

Effect of general population mortality on the north-south mortality gradient in patients on replacement therapy in Europe

In Europe there is considerable variation in mortality on renal replacement therapy (RRT). The causes of this variation are still poorly understood. We hypothesized that differences in mortality in the general population contribute to differences in mortality on RRT. To evaluate this relationship, we studied general population statistics obtained from Eurostat and the individual data of 67,692 patients on RRT from 15 national and regional renal registries. These 15 registries were divided into two geographical regions: North and South Europe. Cox regression was used to assess the relative risk of death (RR) for each region with adjustment for age, gender, diabetes, and additionally general population mortality. In patients on RRT the age, gender and diabetes adjusted RR of death was 0.65 (95% CI (0.64-0.66)) for South compared to North, while in the general population the age and gender standardized RR of death was 0.91. After adjustment for general population mortality in addition to age, gender, and diabetes, the RR of death for patients on RRT in the South changed from 0.65 to 0.74 (95% CI (0.72-0.75)), which indicates that general population mortality accounted for 26% of the region-related mortality difference on RRT. In conclusion, within Europe there exist considerable international differences in the mortality of patients on RRT. Twenty-six percent of the European north-south mortality difference in RRT could be attributed to differences in general population mortality. Our data support the hypothesis that general population mortality is an important factor to take into account when making RRT mortality comparisons.     

Dialysis in Israel, 1989-2005--time trends and international comparisons.

BACKGROUND: A universal increase in the incidence of renal replacement therapy (RRT) was reported in developed countries during the 1990s, especially among the elderly and diabetic patients. We studied trends in RRT incidence and mortality in Israel between 1989 and 2001-2005. METHODS: The end-stage renal disease (ESRD) registry holds data on all RRT patients in Israel. Age-adjusted incidence rate ratios (RRs) were estimated comparing 2001-2005 with 1989. We compared incidence data between Israel and elsewhere using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs). Survival analysis was conducted by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox's proportional hazards regression was used to compare survival of diabetic with non-diabetic ESRD patients. RESULTS: The mean incidence rates per million population increased from 99 in 1989-1991 to 179 in 2003-2005. In 2000, Israel was the second leading country for incidence of RRT. Age-adjusted incidence rates increased by 67% [95% confidence interval (CI): 49-87%], from 1989 to 2001, but the trend was attenuated between 2002 and 2005. The increase in incidence was positively associated with age, the largest increase being among the elderly aged > or = 75 years (RR: 3.18, 95%CI: 2.72-3.70). Diabetes accounted for 41% of RRT in 2001 vs only 19% in 1989. There was no increase in 1-year survival between the beginning and the end of the study period. Patients with diabetes-associated RRT had 57% increased risk of 1-year mortality (adjusted HR: 1.57 95% CI: 1.51-1.63). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a similar proportion of RRT attributed to diabetes in Israel and other countries, the age-adjusted incidence in Israel is considerably higher than most countries.     

Association between attributed cause of end-stage renal disease and risk of death in Brazilian patients receiving renal replacement therapy

BACKGROUND: Studies conducted in several countries have indicated that the survival of patients undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT) depends on the attributed cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to evaluate the association between attributed cause of ESRD and mortality risk in RRT patients in Brazil. METHODS: We analyzed 88,881 patients from the Brazilian Ministry of Health Registry who were undergoing RRT between April 1997 and July 2000. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the relative risk (RR) of death in patients with ESRD secondary to diabetes mellitus (DM), polycystic kidney disease (PKD), and primary glomerulopathies (GN) compared with a reference group comprised of patients with ESRD caused by hypertensive nephropathy. Patient's age, gender, and length of time (years) in RRT before inclusion in the registry (vintage) were included in the adjusted Cox model. RESULTS: Compared with the reference group, the mortality risk was 27% lower in patients with PKD (RR=0.73, 95% CI: 0.65-0.83, p<0.0001); 29% lower in patients with GN (RR=0.71, 95% CI: 0.68-0.74, p<0.0001); and 100% greater in DM patients (RR=2.00, 95% CI: 1.92-2.10, p<0.0001). These relative risks remained statistically significant after adjustment for age, gender, and length of time in RRT before inclusion in the registry. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that compared with the patients with hypertensive nephrosclerosis as attributed cause of ESRD, patients undergoing RRT in Brazil with idiopathic glomerulopathy and polycystic kidney disease have a lower risk of mortality, and patients with diabetes mellitus have a greater risk of mortality.     

Kidney graft survival in Italy and factors influencing it

PURPOSE: National registry data are often a suitable basis for examination of transplant outcomes. Using data supplied by the Italian National Transplant Registry, established in 1995, we performed the first nationwide analysis of this kind. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 4893 recipients of cadaveric kidneys transplanted in all Italian centers from 1995 through 2000 was done to study 5-year graft survival. The association between some donor and recipient variables and outcomes in renal transplantation was analyzed. Graft survival was 93% at 3 months, 89% at 1 year, 82% at 3 years, and 80% at 5 years after transplantation. RESULTS: A significant association between graft survival and donor age (old vs young, relative risk [RR] = 1.62, 95% CI 1.27-2.06) and recipient age (old vs young, RR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.02-1.53). Graft survival was also associated with cold ischemia time (24-36 hours, RR= 1.39, 95% CI 1.05-1.85 and >36 hours, RR= 1.94, 95% CI 1.32-2.86 vs 0-24 hours) and donor/recipient sex mismatch (female/male vs male/male, RR= 1.50, 95% CI 1.17-1.93). CONCLUSION: The quality of kidney transplantation in Italy is satisfactory and is comparable to that in other developed countries. Furthermore, our experience confirms that both donor and recipient factors are major determinants of renal allograft function.     

Survival differences between peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis among "large" ESRD patients in the United States

BACKGROUND: It has been hypothesized that peritoneal dialysis compared to hemodialysis may be less effective in large patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). METHODS: We tested this hypothesis in a cohort of 134,728 new ESRD patients who were initiated on dialysis from May 1, 1995 to July 31, 1997 using data from United States Renal Data System (USRDS). Cox regression models evaluated the association of body mass index (BMI) in quintiles (8.8-20.9, 20.9-23.5, 23.5-26.1, 26.1-30.0, 30.0-75.2 kg/m(2)) with mortality over 2 years in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis patients separately, while time-dependent models evaluated the relative risk (RR) of death by modality for each BMI quintile. RESULTS: For hemodialysis, the adjusted RR of death was greatest for patients with BMI 30.0 (RR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.96-0.99 for diabetic and RR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.98 for nondiabetic patients) compared with the referent (23.5-26.1; RR = 1.00). For peritoneal dialysis, the RR of death was also higher for patients with a BMI <20.9 (RR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.00-1.43 for diabetic and RR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.19-1.64 for nondiabetic patients) but no survival advantage was associated with higher BMI values. The RR of death (peritoneal dialysis/hemodialysis) for each BMI quintile was 0.99, 1.12, 1.26 (P < 0.01), 1.15 (P < 0.01), and 1.44 (P < 0.0001) for diabetic and were 1.07, 1.01, 0.96, 1.04, and 1.22 (P < 0.01) for nondiabetic patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: We conclude that body size modifies the impact of dialysis modality on mortality risk among new ESRD patients in the United States. The selection of hemodialysis over peritoneal dialysis was associated with a survival advantage in patients with large body habitus.     

Association Between Attributed Cause of End-Stage Renal Disease and Risk of Death in Brazilian Patients Receiving Renal Replacement Therapy

Background. Studies conducted in several countries have indicated that the survival of patients undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT) depends on the attributed cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Objectives. This study was conducted to evaluate the association between attributed cause of ESRD and mortality risk in RRT patients in Brazil. Methods. We analyzed 88,881 patients from the Brazilian Ministry of Health Registry who were undergoing RRT between April 1997 and July 2000. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the relative risk (RR) of death in patients with ESRD secondary to diabetes mellitus (DM), polycystic kidney disease (PKD), and primary glomerulopathies (GN) compared with a reference group comprised of patients with ESRD caused by hypertensive nephropathy. Patient's age, gender, and length of time (years) in RRT before inclusion in the registry (vintage) were included in the adjusted Cox model. Results. Compared with the reference group, the mortality risk was 27% lower in patients with PKD (RR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.65–0.83, p< 0.0001); 29% lower in patients with GN (RR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.68–0.74, p< 0.0001); and 100% greater in DM patients (RR = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.92–2.10, p< 0.0001). These relative risks remained statistically significant after adjustment for age, gender, and length of time in RRT before inclusion in the registry. Conclusions. Our data indicate that compared with the patients with hypertensive nephrosclerosis as attributed cause of ESRD, patients undergoing RRT in Brazil with idiopathic glomerulopathy and polycystic kidney disease have a lower risk of mortality, and patients with diabetes mellitus have a greater risk of mortality.     

The renal epidemiology and information network (REIN): a new registry for end-stage renal disease in France.

The French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (REIN) registry began in 2002 to provide a tool for public health decision support, evaluation and research related to renal replacement therapies (RRT) for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). It relies on a network of nephrologists, epidemiologists, patients and public health representatives, coordinated regionally and nationally. Continuous registration covers all dialysis and transplanted patients. In 2003, 2070 patients started RRT, 7854 were on dialysis and 7294 lived with a functioning graft in seven regions (with a population of 16.5 million people). The overall crude annual incidence rate of RRT for ESRD was 123 per million population (p.m.p.) with significant differences in age-adjusted rates across regions, from 84 [95% confidence interval (CI): 74-94] to 155 [138-172] p.m.p. The principal causes of ESRD were hypertension (21%) and diabetic (20%) nephropathies. Initial treatment for ESRD was peritoneal dialysis for 15% of patients and a pre-emptive graft for 3%. The one-year survival rate was 81% [79-83] in the cohort of 2002-2003 incident patients. As of December 31, 2003, the overall crude prevalence was 898 [884-913] p.m.p, with 5% of patients receiving peritoneal dialysis, 47% on haemodialysis and 48% with a functioning graft. The experience in these seven regions over these two years clearly shows the feasibility of the REIN registry, which is progressively expanding to cover the entire country.     

Patients with Fabry disease on dialysis in the United States.

BACKGROUND.: Fabry disease results from an X-linked deficiency of lysosomal alpha-galactosidase A and is a rare cause of end-stage renal disease. Little is known about the characteristics of patients with Fabry disease that initiate dialysis in the United States, although data from Europe suggests these individuals have a poor survival. METHODS.: Using the United States Renal Disease System database, we first studied in detail 42 Fabry patients who initiated dialysis between April 1995 (following the introduction of the new detailed HCFA 2728 form) and July 1998. To examine crude survival in a larger cohort, 95 Fabry patients were studied who initiated dialysis between 1985 and 1993, similar to the European Registry. Diabetic and non-diabetic controls matched by age, gender, race, year of dialysis initiation, and initial dialysis modality were examined for comparison. RESULTS.: During the years 1995 to 1998, the mean age of Fabry patients that initiated dialysis was 42 years, 83% were Caucasian, and 10% were African American. Despite the X-linked inheritance of Fabry disease, 12% of Fabry patients on dialysis were female. At initiation of dialysis mean serum albumin and creatinine were significantly higher and mean body mass index was significantly lower among Fabry patients, but mean glomerular filtration rate was similar to controls. Fabry patients tended to have a lower three-year survival compared to non-diabetic controls, but the results were not significantly different. In a larger cohort of Fabry patients who initiated dialysis between 1985 and 1993, the three-year survival of Fabry patients was significantly lower than non-diabetic controls: 63% (95% CI, 50 to 75%) versus 74% (95% CI, 67 to 80%; P=0.03). CONCLUSION.: End-stage renal disease is associated with significant morbidity and mortality among patients with Fabry disease. Recent evidence that progression of Fabry disease may be attenuated by enzyme replacement therapy necessitates increased awareness of Fabry disease and its comorbidities.