Normal IGF-I and enhanced IGFBP-3 response to very low rhGH dose in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy

Well-nourished patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) show slight reduction of mean basal IGF-I levels which, however, display a response to a rhGH dose as low as 5.0 microg/kg/day similar to that of age-matched control subjects (CS). To further investigate peripheral GH sensitivity, we studied the IGF-I and IGFBP-3 responses to 4-day s.c. 2.5 microg/kg/day rhGH administration, the lowest effective dose able to increase IGF-I levels in normal subjects, in 10 DCM patients [age (mean+/-SE): 57.6+/-1.0 yr, body mass index (BMI): 24.0+/-1.2 kg/m2, left ventricular ejection fraction: 26.2+/-3.2%, NYHA (New York Heart Association): I/0, II/4, III/4, IV/2] and in 9 age-matched healthy CS (age: 55.3+/-1.2 yr, BMI: 23.7+/-1.8 kg/m2). Basal IGF-I levels in DCM were lower though not significantly than those in CS (147.7+/-9.8 vs 174.7+/-17.0 microg/l). Basal IGFBP-3 levels in DCM were similar to those in CS (3.1+/-0.3 vs 2.7+/-0.2 mg/l). In CS 4-day rhGH increased IGF-I levels (222.4+/-14.9 microg/l; p<0.01 vs baseline) but did not modify IGFBP-3 levels (3.0+/-0.2 mg/l). In DCM IGF-I levels were increased by 4-day rhGH administration (175.7+/-11.0 microg/l; p<0.05 vs baseline) with a similar percent extent than in CS. On the other hand, in DCM, but not in CS, 4-day rhGH significantly increased IGFBP-3 levels (3.5+/-0.3 mg/l; p<0.05 vs baseline). Therefore, in conclusion, testing with the lowest effective rhGH dose further suggest that peripheral GH sensitivity in well-nourished DCM is preserved. On the other hand, DCM patients show enhanced IGFBP-3 sensitivity to stimulation by rhGH.     

Patients with dilated cardiomyopathy show reduction of the somatotroph responsiveness to GHRH both alone and combined with arginine

OBJECTIVE: Altered function of the GH/IGF-I axis in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) has been reported. In fact, DCM patients show reduction of IGF-I levels, which could reflect slight peripheral GH resistance or, alternatively, reduced somatotroph secretion. Spontaneous GH secretion has been reported to be altered by some but not by other authors, whereas the GH response to GHRH, but not that to GH-releasing peptides, seems reduced in DCM patients. On the other hand, it is well known that the GH response to GHRH in humans is markedly potentiated by arginine (ARG), which probably acts via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release; in fact the GHRH+ARG test is known as one of the most reliable to evaluate the maximal secretory capacity of somatotroph cells. METHODS: In order to further clarify the somatotroph function in DCM, in well-nourished patients with DCM (34 male, 4 female; age (mean+/-s.e. m.) 57.8+/-1.1 years; body mass index (BMI) 24.6+/-0.6kg/m(2); left ventricular ejection fraction 23.2+/-1.6%; New York Heart Association classification I/1, II/17, III/18, IV/2) we studied the GH response to GHRH (1.0 microgram/kg i.v.) alone or combined with ARG (0.5g/kg i.v.). The results in DCM patients were compared with those in age-matched control subjects (CS) (39 male, 7 female; age 58.9+/-1.0 years; BMI 23.2+/-0.3kg/m(2)). RESULTS: Mean IGF-I levels in DCM patients were lower than in CS (144.3+/-6.9 vs 175.1+/-8. 4 microgram/l, P<0.05) whereas basal GH levels were similar in both groups (1.7+/-0.3 vs 1.7+/-0.3 microgram/l). The GH response to GHRH in DCM patients was lower (P<0.05) than that in CS (GH peak 6.5+/-1.2 vs 10.7+/-2.1 microgram/l). In both groups the GH response to GHRH+ARG was higher (P<0.001) than that to GHRH alone. However, the GH response to GHRH+ARG in DCM patients remained clearly lower (P<0.01) than that in CS (18.3+/-3.2 vs 34.1+/-4.6 microgram/l). The GH response to GHRH alone and combined with ARG was not associated with the severity of the disease. CONCLUSION: DCM patients show blunted GH responses to GHRH both alone and combined with ARG. Evidence that ARG does not restore the GH response to GHRH in DCM patients makes it unlikely that the somatotroph hyporesponsiveness to the neurohormone reflects hyperactivity of hypothalamic somatostatinergic neurons.     

The negative GH auto-feedback in childhood: effects of rhGH and/or GHRH on the somatotroph response to GHRH or hexarelin, a peptidyl GH secretagogue, in children

Aim of the present study was to further clarify the negative GH auto-feedback mechanisms in childhood. To this goal we studied the effects of rhGH and/or GHRH administration on the GH response to GHRH or hexarelin (HEX), a peptidyl GH secretagogue, in normal short children. In 34 prepubertal children (12 girls and 22 boys, age 8.2- 14.2 yr) with normal short stature (normal height velocity and IGF-I levels) the following tests were performed: group A (no.=11): GHRH (GHRH 1 - 29, Geref, Serono; 1 microg/kg iv at 150 min) preceded by saline or GHRH at 0 min; group B (no.=6): GHRH preceded by saline or rhGH (0.005 IU/kg iv at 0 min); group C (no.=6): GHRH preceded by rhGH alone or combined with GHRH; group D (no.=6): HEX (2 microg/kg iv at 150 min) alone or preceded by rhGH. In group A, the GH response to GHRH was not modified by pre-treatment with GHRH (GH peak, mean+/-SEM: 16.7+/-2.9 vs 15.1+/-2.3 microg/l, respectively). In group B, the GH response to GHRH was clearly inhibited by rhGH (8.7+/-2.3 vs 38.8+/-4.5 microg/l, p<0.001); the GH rise after rhGH in group B overlapped with that after GHRH in group A. In group C, the GH response to GHRH after pre-treatment with rhGH (13.2+/-4.0 microg/l) was similar to that in group B and was not significantly modified by pre-treatment with rhGH+ GHRH (6.9+/-2.7 microg/l); the GH rise after rhGH+GHRH was higher (p<0.05) than that after rhGH alone. In group D, the GH response to HEX was significantly blunted by pre-treatment with rhGH (34.1+/-11.7 vs 51.2+/-17.9 microg/l, p<0.05). Our results demonstrate that in childhood the somatotroph response to GHRH is preserved after GHRH while it is inhibited after rhGH administration, which is also able to blunt the GH response to HEX. Thus, the somatostatin-mediated negative GH auto-feedback is already operative in childhood; the reason why the GHRH- induced GH rise is not inhibited by GHRH pre-treatment is unexplained.     

Reduction of the pituitary GH releasable pool in short children with GH neurosecretory dysfunction

OBJECTIVES: The classical 'GH neurosecretory dysfunction' (GHNSD) refers to slowly growing children with normal GH responses to classical provocative tests but impaired spontaneous GH secretion over 24 h frequently leading to low IGF-I levels. Thus it has been assumed that these subjects have insufficiency of spontaneous GH secretion due to neuroendocrine abnormalities in spite of a normal releasable pool of GH. However, classical provocative tests do not reliably assess the maximal somatotroph capacity; thus it is still unclear if the GH pool is really preserved or not. GHRH + arginine test is more potent than the classical tests and evaluates the maximal secretory capacity of somatotroph cells. The GH response to this stimulus is reproducible and also independent of age and puberty. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: We studied the GH response to GHRH (1 microgram/kg iv) + arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg iv) in 19 short children with GHNSD (14 boys and 5 girls, age: 12.1 +/- 0.7 years, pubertal stages I-III, HV-SDS between -1.6 and -4.9; GH peak > 10 micrograms/l after classical stimuli but mean GH concentration (mGHc) < 3 micrograms/l). The results in GHNSD were compared with those in 38 short children with idiopathic or organic severe GHD (GHD, 29 boys and 9 girls, age: 11.2 +/- 0.6 years, pubertal stages I-III, HV-SDS between -1.8 and -4.4; GH peak < 10 micrograms/l after 2 classical provocative tests) and in 83 children with normal or familial short stature (NC, 59 boys and 24 girls, age: 11.5 +/- 0.3 years., pubertal stages I-III; HV-SDS > 25th centile, normal IGF-I levels). RESULTS: Mean IGF-I levels in GHNSD (121.9 +/- 20.3 micrograms/l) were lower (P < 0.001) than those in NC (270.3 +/- 13.8 micrograms/l) but higher (P < 0.001) than those in GHD (72.0 +/- 4.0 micrograms/l). The mean GH concentration (mGHc) in GHNSD (2.1 +/- 0.1 micrograms/l) was lower (P < 0.01) than that in NC (4.9 +/- 0.5 micrograms/l) but higher (P < 0.01) than that in GHD (1.5 +/- 0.2 micrograms/l). On the other hand, the mean peak GH response to GHRH + ARG in GHNSD (43.7 +/- 3.7 micrograms/l) was markedly higher (P < 0.001) than that in GHD (8.2 +/- 0.9 micrograms/l) but significantly lower (P < 0.01) than that in NC (60. 4 +/- 2.7 micrograms/l). All GHD patients had peak GH responses to GHRH + ARG below the 3rd centile limit of normality (20 micrograms/l), while all GHNSD patients had peak GH responses within the normal range. No significant correlation was found between GH peak after GHRH + ARG, mGHc and IGF-I levels in each group. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that short children with 'GH neurosecretory dysfunction' show reduction in the GH releasable pool evaluated by the provocative and potent GHRH + arginine test. However, the peak GH response to a single GHRH + arginine test in GH neurosecretory dysfunction is always within the normal range indicating that this test as well as classical stimuli does not distinguish normal subjects from GH neurosecretory dysfunction.     

The study of spontaneous GH secretion after 36-h fasting distinguishes between GH-deficient and normal adults

OBJECTIVE: Within an appropriate clinical context, GH deficiency (GHD) in adults can only be diagnosed biochemically by provocative testing. The evaluation of IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and even of spontaneous GH secretion do not establish the diagnosis of adult GHD. In fact, remarkable overlaps between normal and GHD adults have been reported for all these parameters. On the other hand, it is well known that even short-term fasting stimulates GH secretion in normal subjects. The aim of our study was to determine the effects of 36 h fasting on 8-h diurnal GH, insulin and glucose levels as well as on basal IGF-I, IGFBP-3, acid-labile subunit (ALS), IGFBP-1, GHBP and free fatty acid (FFA) levels. SUBJECTS: We studied 9 GHD adults (GHD, 8 males, 1 female; age, mean +/- SEM: 37.6 +/- 2.3 years, body mass index (BMI): 24.5 +/- 1.0 kg/m2) and 20 age-matched normal subjects (NS) as controls (13 males, 7 females; age: 28.9 +/- 0.6 years, BMI: 21.6 +/- 0.4 kg/m2). STUDY DESIGN: In all subjects we studied the effects of 36 h fasting on 8-h daytime GH, insulin and glucose levels (assay every 30 min from 0800 h to 1600 h) as well as on basal IGF-I, IGFBP-3, ALS, IGFBP-1, GHBP and FFA levels. RESULTS: Before fasting, basal mean IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and ALS levels in GHD were lower (P < 0. 0001) than in NS. IGFBP-1, GHBP and FFA levels were similar in both groups. Before fasting mean GH concentration (mGHc) in GHD was lower (P < 0.05) than in NS (0.4 +/- 0.2 vs. 2.2 +/- 0.6 mu/l) but with a clear overlap between the 2 groups (range 0.4-0.8 vs. 0.4-6.8 mu/l). After fasting, both in GHD and NS basal IGF-I, IGFBP-3, ALS and GHBP levels did not change significantly. On the other hand, in both GHD and in NS IGFBP-1 was increased (P < 0.0001) to a similar extent, while FFA increased in NS more (P < 0.01) than in GHD. Fasting significantly increased mGHc in NS (12.0 +/- 1.2 mu/l, P < 0.0001) but not in GHD (0.6 +/- 0.2 mu/l). After fasting, no overlap was present between GHD and NS (0.4-1.6 vs. 2.4-20.8 mu/l, respectively). Mean glucose and insulin concentrations over 8 h in GHD and NS in basal conditions were similar and were reduced to the same extent in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that after short-term fasting, the study of spontaneous GH secretion distinguishes between GH-deficient adults and normal subjects; this phenomenon occurs before significant changes in IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels. These results suggest that the assessment of spontaneous GH secretion could be useful for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency only after short-term fasting.     

Recombinant human IGF-I does not modify the ACTH and cortisol responses to hCRH and hexarelin, a peptidyl GH secretagogue, in humans

An inhibitory influence of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) on hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis has been hypothesized. In fact, it has been reported that the rhGH (recombinant human GH)-induced IGF-I increase inhibits both cortisol and GH response to MK-0677, a non-peptidyl GH secretagogue in animals. The aim of this study was to further clarify the inhibitory role, if any, of IGF-I on corticotroph function. We studied the effect of rhIGF-I (recombinant human IGF-I; 20 microg/kg s.c. at -180 min) or placebo on the ACTH and cortisol responses to hCRH (human CRH; 2.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 min) or hexarelin (HEX; 2.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 min), a peptidyl GHS, in normal young women. The effect of rhIGF-I on the GH response to HEX was also studied. The subjects were six normal young women [age: 26-35 yr; body mass index (BMI): 19-23 kg/m2] in their early follicular phase. The results showed that after s.c. rhIGF-I administration, circulating IGF-I levels increased approximately 77%, peaking at -60 min and persisting similar up to +120 min. The mean ACTH, cortisol and GH concentrations did not change from -180 to 0 min when evaluated after both placebo or rhIGF-I. CRH and HEX induced similar ACTH (peak vs baseline, mean+/-SE: 47.5+/-10.9 vs 21.3+/-3.0 pg/ml and 30.3+/-6.9 vs 19.2+/-3.8 pg/ml, respectively; p<0.04) and cortisol responses (177.5+/-5.4 vs 109.3+/-10.3 microg/l and 149.4+/-12.3 vs 119.8+/-16.4 microg/l, respectively, p<0.04). RhIGF-I pretreatment did not modify the ACTH and cortisol responses to hCRH (46.0+/-13.8 pg/ml and 181.1+/-16.9 microg/l, respectively) as well as those to HEX (28.8+/-5.0 pg/ml and 144.1+/-16.2 microg/l, respectively). On the other hand, the GH response to HEX was clearly reduced by rhIGF-I (23.9+/-4.7 vs 64.7+/-14.8 microg/l, p<0.05). Our findings show that rhIGF-I-induced increase of circulating IGF-I levels exerts negative feedback action on somatotroph secretion, while it does not modify the corticotroph and the adrenal responsiveness to CRH or hexarelin.     

The IGF-I response to very low rhGH doses is preserved in human ageing

OBJECTIVES: The activity of the GH/IGF-I axis varies during life and is clearly reduced in the elderly. In fact, GH, IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels in older people are clearly reduced and similar to those observed in patients with GH deficiency. The declining activity of the GH/IGF-I axis with advancing age may contribute to changes in body composition, structure, function and metabolism. In fact, treatment with pharmacological doses of rhGH restored plasma IGF-I levels, increased lean body mass and muscle strength while decreased adipose tissue mass in healthy elderly subjects. At present it is unclear whether peripheral GH sensitivity is preserved in aging. To clarify this point, we aimed to verify the effect of both single dose and short term treatment with very low rhGH doses on the IGF-I levels in normal elderly subjects. Normal young adults were studied as controls. DESIGN: We studied the IGF-I response to rhGH administration after single (20 micrograms/kg s.c.) or repeated administrations (5 micrograms/kg s.c. for 4 days) in two groups of young and elderly subjects. SUBJECTS: Twenty-seven healthy elderly (ES, 14 F and 13 M, age mean +/- SEM: 69.4 +/- 1.3 years, BMI: 23.9 +/- 0.5 kg/m2) and 21 young adult subjects (YS, 12 F and 9 M, 29.8 +/- 1.2 years, 23.8 +/- 0.5 kg/m2) were studied, divided into two groups. MEASUREMENTS: Group 1: blood samples for IGF-I and IGFBP-3 assay were drawn basally and 12 h after rhGH administration (20 micrograms/kg). Group 2: blood samples for IGF-I, IGFBP-3, glucose and insulin assays were drawn basally, 12 h after the first and the last rhGH administration (5 micrograms/kg). Free T3 (fT3), free T4 (fT4) and TSH levels were also assayed basally and after the last rhGH administration; oestradiol and testosterone levels were measured basally. RESULTS: Basal IGF-I levels were lower in ES (whole group) than in YS (whole group) (123.1 +/- 8.9 vs. 230.4 +/- 16.1 micrograms/l, P < 0.001) while IGFBP-3 levels in the two groups were similar (2.7 +/- 0.2 vs. 3.1 +/- 0.2 mg/l). No sex-related differences in IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels were recorded in either group. Group 1: the single administration of 20 micrograms/kg rhGH induced a significant (P < 0.001) IGF-I rise both in YS (318.0 +/- 25.3 vs. 256.0 +/- 21.6 micrograms/l) and ES (187.2 +/- 16.8 vs. 100.4 +/- 9.5 micrograms/l). IGF-I levels after rhGH in ES persisted lower than those in YS (P < 0.001), but the percentage IGF-I increase after rhGH was higher (P < 0.001) in ES (91.6 +/- 12.9%) than in YS (23.9 +/- 5.0%) subjects. Both in YS and ES IGFBP-3 levels were significantly increased to the same extent by 20 micrograms/kg rhGH (3.0 +/- 0.2 vs. 2.3 +/- 0.2 mg/l; 2.9 +/- 0.2 vs. 2.6 +/- 0.2 mg/l, P < 0.001 vs. baseline). Group 2: basal glucose, insulin, fT3, fT4 and TSH levels in YS and ES were similar; testosterone levels in aged and young men were similar while oestradiol levels in aged women were lower (P < 0.01) than in the young ones. IGF-I levels were significantly increased 12 h after the first administration of 5 micrograms/kg rhGH both in ES (166.6 +/- 15.7 vs. 138.3 +/- 12.1 micrograms/l, P < 0.03) and YS (272.2 +/- 16.1 vs. 230.4 +/- 16.1 micrograms/l, P < 0.001). Twelve hours after the last rhGH administration IGF-I levels were further increased (P < 0.001) both in ES (208.7 +/- 21.1 micrograms/l) and YS (301.7 +/- 17.6 micrograms/l). IGF-I levels in ES persisted lower than those in YS at each time point (P < 0.001); however, the percentage IGF-I increase after rhGH in ES and YS was similar (after the first administration: 22.4 +/- 5.1 vs. 21.7 +/- 5.1%; after the last administration: 52.9 +/- 9.5 vs. 39.5 +/- 9.9%). No significant variation in IGFBP-3, glucose, insulin, fT3, fT4 or TSH levels was recorded in either ES or YS. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that IGF-I levels in aging are reduced but the peripheral sensitivity to rhGH is preserved. In fact, in aged subjects the percentage rhGH-induced IGF-I increase is similar or even highe     

Effects of short-term administration of low-dose rhGH on IGF-I levels in obesity and Cushing's syndrome: indirect evaluation of sensitivity to GH

OBJECTIVE: To verify the hypothesis of an increased sensitivity to GH in obesity (OB) and Cushing's syndrome (CS). DESIGN: We studied the effects of short-term administration of low-dose rhGH on circulating IGF-I levels in patients with simple OB or CS and in normal subjects (NS). METHODS: Nineteen women with abdominal OB aged (mean +/- s.e.m.) 38.2+/-3.1 years, body mass index 40.7+/-2.5 kg/m(2), waist to hip ratio 0.86+/-0.02, ten with CS (50.4+/-4.2 years, 29.7 +/- 3.3 kg/m(2)) and 11 NS (35.0+/-3.6 years, 20.5+/-0.5 kg/m(2)) underwent s.c. administration of 5 microg/kg per day rhGH at 2200 h for four days. Serum IGF-I, IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), GH-binding protein (GHBP), insulin and glucose levels were determined at baseline and 12 h after the first and the last rhGH administration. RESULTS: Basal IGF-I levels in NS (239.3+/-22.9 microg/l) were similar to those in OB (181.5+/-13.7 microg/l) and CS (229.0+/-29.1 microg/l). Basal IGFBP-3, GHBP and glucose levels in NS, OB and CS were similar while insulin levels in NS were lower (P<0.01) than those in OB and CS. In NS, the low rhGH dose induced a sustained rise of IGF-I levels (279.0+/-19.5 microg/l, P<0.001), a non-significant IGFBP-3 increase and no change in GHBP, insulin and glucose levels. In OB and CS, the IGF-I response to rhGH showed progressive increase (246.2+/-17.2 and 311.0+/-30.4 microg/l respectively, P<0.01 vs baseline). Adjusting by ANCOVA for basal values, rhGH-induced IGF-I levels in CS (299.4 microg/l) were higher than in OB (279.1 microg/l, P<0.01), which, in turn, were higher (P<0.05) than in NS (257.7 microg/l). In OB, but not in CS, IGFBP-3 and insulin levels showed slight but significant (P<0.05) increases during rhGH treatment, which did not modify glucose levels in any group; thus, in the OB patient group a significant fall in glucose/insulin ratio was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term treatment with low-dose rhGH has enhanced stimulatory effect on IGF-I levels in OB and, particularly, in hypercortisolemic patients. These findings support the hypothesis that hyperinsulinism and hypercortisolism enhance the sensitivity to GH in humans.     

Acute cardiovascular and hormonal effects of GH and hexarelin, a synthetic GH-releasing peptide, in humans.

Reduced cardiac mass and performances are present in GH deficiency and are counteracted by rhGH replacement. GH and IGF-I possess specific myocardial receptors and have been reported able to exert an acute inotropic effect. Synthetic GH secretagogues (GHS) possess specific pituitary and hypothalamic but even myocardial receptors. In 7 male volunteers, we studied cardiac performance by radionuclide angiocardiography after iv administration of rhGH or hexarelin (HEX), a peptidyl GHS. The administration of rhGH or HEX increased circulating GH levels to the same extent (AUC: 1594.6+/-88.1 vs 1739.3+/-262.2 microg/l/min for 90 min) while aldosterone and catecholamine levels did not change; HEX, but not rhGH, significantly increased cortisol levels. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), mean blood pressure (MBP) and heart rate (HR) were unaffected by rhGH (62.4+/-2.1 vs 62.1+/-2.3%, 90.6+/-3.4 vs 92.0+/-2.5 mm Hg, 62.3+/-1.8 vs 66.7+/-2.7 bpm). HEX increased LVEF (70.7+/-3.0 vs 64.0+/-1.5%, p<0.03) without significant changes in MBP and HR (92.8+/-4.7 vs 92.4+/-3.2 mm Hg, 63.1+/-2.1 vs 67.0+/-2.9 bpm). LVEF significantly raised at 15 min, peaked at 30 min and lasted up to 60 min after HEX. These findings suggest that in man, the acute administration of Hexarelin exerts a short-lasting, positive inotropic effect. This effect seems GH-independent and might be mediated by specific GHS myocardial receptors.     

Comparisons among old and new provocative tests of GH secretion in 178 normal adults

Classical provocative stimuli of GH secretion such as insulin-induced hypoglycaemia, arginine, clonidine, glucagon and levodopa have been widely used in clinical practice for approximately 30 years. On the other hand, in the last 10 years new potent stimuli of GH secretion have been proposed, but an extensive comparison with the classical ones has rarely been performed, at least in adults. In order to compare the GH-releasing activity of old and new provocative stimuli of GH secretion, and to define the normative values of the GH response, in 178 normal adults (95 males, 83 females; age range: 20-50 years, all within +/-15% of their ideal body weight), we studied the GH response to: insulin-induced hypoglycaemia (ITT, 0.1IU/kg i.v.), arginine (ARG, 0.5g/kg i.v.), clonidine (CLO, 300 microg/kg p.o.), glucagon (GLU, 1mg i.m.), pyridostigmine (PD, 120mg p.o.), galanin (GAL, 80pmol/kg per min), GH-releasing hormone (GHRH, 1 microg/kg i.v.), GHRH+ARG, GHRH+PD, hexarelin, a GH-releasing protein (HEX, 2 microg/kg i.v.) and GHRH+HEX (0.25 microg/kg i.v.). The mean (+/-s.e.m.) peak GH response to ITT (21.8+/-2.8, range: 3.0-84.0 microg/l) was similar to those to ARG (18.0+/-1.6, range: 2.9-39.5 microg/l) or GLU (20. 5+/-2.2, range: 10.6-36.9 microg/l) which, in turn, were higher (P<0. 001) than those to CLO (8.2+/-1.6, range: 0.3-21.5 microg/l), PD (9. 6+/-1.1, range: 2.2-33.0 microg/l) and GAL (9.3+/-1.1, range: 3.9-18. 3 microg/l). The GH response to GHRH (19.1+/-1.5, range: 2.7-55.0 microg/l) was similar to those after ITT, ARG or GLU but clearly lower than those after GHRH+ARG (65.9+/-5.5, range: 13.8-171.0 microg/l) and GHRH+PD (50.2+/-4.6, range: 17.7-134.5 microg/l) which, in turn, were similar. The GH response to HEX (55.3+/-5.5, range: 13.9-163.5 microg/l) was similar to those after GHRH+ARG and GHRH+PD but lower (P<0.001) than that after GHRH+HEX (86.0+/-4.3, range: 49. 0-125.0 microg/l) which was the most potent stimulus of GH secretion. In this adult population the third centile limits of peak GH response to various stimuli were the following: ITT: 5.3; ARG: 2.9; CLO: 1.5; GLU: 7.6; PD: 2.2; GAL: 4.0; GHRH: 5.0; GHRH+ARG: 17.8; GHRH+PD: 17.9; HEX: 21.6; GHRH+HEX: 57.1. These results confirm that, among classical provocative tests of GH secretion, ITT followed by ARG and GLU are the most potent ones and possess clear limits of normality. GHRH+ARG or PD and HEX are strong stimuli of GH secretion which, however, is maximally stimulated by a combination of GHRH and a low dose of HEX. It is recommended that each test is used with appropriate cut-off limits.     

Low-dose recombinant human growth hormone as adjuvant therapy to lifestyle modifications in the management of obesity

Obese individuals are in a reduced GH/IGF-I state that may be maladaptive. Fifty-nine obese men and premenopausal menstruating women (body mass index, 36.9 +/- 5.0 kg/m(2)) were randomized to a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of low dose recombinant human GH (rhGH). During the 6-month intervention, subjects self-administered daily rhGH or equivalent volume of placebo at 200 micro g (1.9 +/- 0.3 microg/kg for men, 2.0 +/- 0.3 microg/kg for women); after 1 month, the dose was increased to 400 microg (3.8 +/- 0.5 microg/kg) in men and 600 microg (6.0 +/- 0.8 microg/kg) in women. rhGH was then discontinued, and subjects were followed up after 3 months. Forty completed the intervention, and 39 completed the follow-up. Drop-out rates between rhGH vs. placebo groups were not different (chi(2) = 1.45; P = 0.228). One subject discontinued the drug due to an rhGH-related side effect. Body weight (BW) decreased with rhGH from 100.4 +/- 13.2 to 98.0 +/- 15.6 kg at 6 months (P = 0.04) and was sustained at 98.1 +/- 16.6 kg at 9 months (P = 0.02). BW loss was entirely due to loss of body fat (BF). Intention to treat analyses demonstrated changes from baseline between rhGH and placebo in BW (-2.16 +/- 4.48 vs. -0.04 +/- 2.67 kg; P = 0.03) and BF (-2.89 +/- 3.76 vs. -0.68 +/- 2.37 kg; P = 0.01). rhGH increased IGF-I from -0.72 to +0.10 SD (P = 0.0001). rhGH increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol 19% from 1.11 +/- 0.34 to 1.32 +/- 0.28 mmol/liter (P < 0.001). Neither group had changes in fasting glucose, insulin sensitivity, or resting energy expenditure. In conclusion, in obesity, rhGH normalized IGF-I levels, induced loss of BW from BF, and improved lipid profile without untoward effects on insulin sensitivity.     

Accelerated escape from GH autonegative feedback in midpuberty in males: evidence for time-delimited GH-induced somatostatinergic outflow in adolescent boys

A single injected pulse of GH inhibits the time-delayed secretion of GH in the adult by way of central mechanisms that drive somatostatin and repress GHRH outflow. The marked amplification of spontaneous GH pulse amplitude in puberty poses an autoregulatory paradox. We postulated that this disparity might reflect unique relief of GH-induced autonegative feedback during this window of development. The present study contrasts GH autonegative feedback in: 1) normal prepubertal boys (PP) (n = 6; Tanner genital stage I, chronologically aged 8 yr, 9 months to 10 yr, 1 month; median bone age 8.5 yr); 2) longitudinally identified midpubertal boys (MP) (n = 6; Tanner genital stages III/IV, aged 12 yr, 6 months to 15 yr, 6 months; median bone age 15 yr); and 3) healthy young men (YM) (n = 6, aged 18-24 yr; bone age >18 yr). Subjects each underwent four randomly ordered tandem peptide infusions on separate mornings while fasting: i.e. 1) saline/saline infused iv bolus at 0830 h and 1030 h; 2) saline/GHRH (0.3 microg/kg i.v. bolus) at the foregoing times; 3) recombinant human (rh) GH (3 microg/kg as a 6-min square-wave i.v. pulse)/saline; and 4) rhGH and GHRH. To monitor GH autofeedback effects, blood samples were obtained every 10 min for 5.5 h beginning at 0800 h (30 min before GH or saline infusion). Serum GH concentrations were quantitated by ultrasensitive chemiluminometry (threshold 0.005 microg/liter). On the day of successive saline/saline infusion, MP boys maintained higher serum concentrations of: 1) GH ( microg/liter), 2.2 +/- 0.25, compared with PP (0.61 +/- 0.10) or YM (0.88 +/- 0.36) (P = 0.011); 2) IGF-I ( micro g/liter), 493 +/- 49 vs. PP (134 +/- 16) and YM (242 +/- 22) (P < 0.001); 3) T (ng/dl), 524 +/- 58 vs. PP (<20) (P < 0.001); and 4) E2 (pg/ml),19 +/- 3 vs. PP (< 10) (P = 0.030) (mean +/- SEM). Consecutive saline/GHRH infusion elicited comparable peak (absolute maximal) serum GH concentrations (micrograms per liter) in the three study groups, i.e. 18 +/- 5.0 (PP), 9.6 +/- 1.7 (MP), and 14 +/- 5.3 (YM) (each P < 0.01 vs. saline; P = NS cohort effect). Injection of rhGH attenuated subsequent GHRH-stimulated peak serum GH concentrations (micrograms per liter) to 7.8 +/- 1.9 (PP), 5.8 +/- 1.2 (MP), and 4.8 +/- 1.1 (YM) (each P < 0.01 vs. saline; P = NS pubertal effect). GH autofeedback reduced non-GHRH-stimulated (basal) serum GH concentrations by 0.74 +/- 0.28 (PP), 5.7 +/- 1.7 (MP) and 1.4 +/- 0.27 (YM) fold, compared with saline (P = 0.016 for MP vs. PP or YM). In addition to greater fractional autoinhibition, MP boys exhibited markedly accentuated postnadir escape (4.6-fold steeper slope) of suppressed GH concentrations (P < 0.001 vs. PP or YM). Linear regression analysis of data from all 18 subjects revealed that the fasting IGF-I concentration negatively predicted fold-autoinhibition of GHRH-stimulated peak GH release (r = -0.847, P = 0.006) and positively forecast fold-autoinhibition of basal GH release (r = +0.869, P < 0.001). In contrast, the kinetics of rhGH did not differ among the three study cohorts. In summary, boys in midpuberty manifest equivalent responsiveness to exogenous GHRH-stimulated GH secretion; heightened susceptibility to rhGH-induced fractional inhibition of endogenous secretagogue-driven GH release, compared with the prepubertal or adult male; and accelerated recovery of GH output after acute autonegative feedback. This novel tripartite mechanism could engender recurrent high-amplitude GH secretory bursts that mark sex hormone-dependent activation of the human somatotropic axis.     

Low dose hexarelin and growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone as a diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults: comparison with insulin-induced hypoglycemia test.

GH deficiency (GHD) in adults must be shown by provocative testing of GH secretion. Insulin-induced hypoglycemia (ITT) is the test of choice, and severe GHD, treated with recombinant human GH replacement, is defined by a GH peak response to ITT of less than 3 microg/L. GHRH plus arginine (ARG) is a more provocative test and is as sensitive as ITT provided that appropriate cut-off limits are assumed. GH secretagogues are a family of peptidyl and nonpeptidyl GH-releasing molecules that strongly stimulate GH secretion and, even at low doses, truly synergize with GHRH. Our aim was to verify the diagnostic reliability of the hexarelin (HEX; 0.25 microg/kg, iv) and GHRH (1 microg/kg, iv) test for the diagnosis of adult GHD. To this goal, in the present study we 1) defined the normal ranges of the GH response to GHRH+HEX in a group of normal young adult volunteers (NS; n = 25; 18 men and 7 women; age, 28.5+/-0.6 yr) and in 11 of them verified its reproducibility in a second session, and 2) compared the GH response to GHRH+HEXwith that to ITT in a group of normal subjects (n = 33; 12 men and 21 women; age, 34.1+/-1.5 yr) and hypopituitaric adults with GHD (n = 19; 10 men and 9 women; age, 39.9+/-2.2 yr; GH peak <5 microg/L after ITT). The GH response to GHRH+ARG was also evaluated in all GHD and in 77 normal subjects (40 men and 37 women; age, 28.1+/-0.6 yr). The mean GH peak after GHRH+HEX in NS was 83.6+/-4.5 microg/L; the third and first percentile limits of the normal GH response were 55.5 and 51.2 microg/L, respectively). The GH response to GHRH+HEX in NS showed good intraindividual reproducibility. In GHD the mean GH peak after GHRH+HEX (2.6+/-0.7 microg/L) was similar to that after GHRH+ARG (3.6+/-1.0 microg/L), and both were higher (P < 0.001) than that after ITT (0.6+/-0.1 microg/L); the GH responses to GHRH+HEX were positively associated with those to ITT and GHRH+ARG. Analyzing individual GH responses, 100% had severe GHD after ITT (GH peak, <3 microg/L). After GHRH+HEX all GHD had GH peaks below the third percentile limit of normality appropriate for this test (i.e. 55.5 microg/L). Thirteen of 19 (68.4%) GHD subjects had GH peaks below 3 microg/L after GHRH+HEX but all 19 (100%) had GH peaks below the first percentile limit of normality (i.e. 51.2 microg/L). The GH responses to GHRH+HEX were highly concordant with those after GHRH+ARG. In conclusion, the present results define normal limits of the GH response to stimulation with low dose HEX+GHRH in normal adults and show that this test is as sensitive as ITT for the diagnosis of adult GHD provided that appropriate cut-off limits are considered.     

Somatostatin infusion withdrawal: studies in the acute and recovery phase of anorexia nervosa,and in obesity

OBJECTIVE: Changes in GH/IGF-I axis activity occur in both anorexia nervosa (AN) and obesity (OB). A GH hypersecretory state with very low plasma IGF-I levels is present in AN, whereas in morbid OB, GH secretion is dull and plasma IGF-I levels are generally preserved. Endogenous GHRH activity in AN and OB has never been directly studied, although indirect evidence would indicate that GHRH function is altered in either condition, possibly enhanced and reduced respectively. Somatostatin (SS) infusion withdrawal (SSIW) is followed by a rebound rise of plasma GH in animals and humans, an event which, allegedly, is mediated by endogenous GHRH release. METHODS: In the present study, 28 young women, eight with active AN (A-AN), six with AN in the recovery phase (R-AN), eight with morbid OB, and six healthy age-matched normal weight subjects (NW), were studied. All subjects underwent, on different occasions, the following two tests: (i) acute GHRH injection (1 microg/kg, i.v.); (ii) infusion of SS (9 microg/kg per h i.v. over 60 min), with blood samples drawn prior to and at different intervals after drug injections. Plasma GH levels were measured at each time interval in all sessions, and, in addition, baseline plasma estradiol, free triiodothyronine, TSH, IGF-I and insulin were measured at -30 min. RESULTS: Baseline plasma GH concentrations were significantly higher in A-AN than in NW (4.7+/-0.7 vs 2.1+/-0.6 microg/l, P<0.01). Baseline GH levels in R-AN were also higher than in NW, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (5.6+/-1.7 microg/l, not significant (NS)). Baseline plasma GH concentrations were significantly lower in OB than in NW (0.3+/-0.1 microg/l, P<0.01). GHRH-stimulated GH release was significantly higher in A-AN than in NW (mean change in area under the curve (DeltaAUC) 1904.9+/-626.1 vs 613.9+/-75.9 microg/l per min, P<0.01), whereas no statistically significant difference was present between R-AN and NW (mean DeltaAUC 638.2+/-293.0 microg/l per min, NS); in OB, GHRH failed to evoke a plasma GH rise (mean DeltaAUC 239.8+/-89.9 microg/l per min vs A-AN, R-AN, and NW, P<0.01). SS infusion markedly reduced plasma GH concentrations in both A-AN and R-AN and, to a lesser extent, in NW, but failed to do so in OB. In A-AN, SSIW was followed by a plasma GH rise markedly higher than that present in NW (mean DeltaAUC 193.0+/-42.3 vs 60.1+/-11.4 microg/l per min, P<0.01), whereas in R-AN the GH response after SSIW was nearly superimposable on that registered in NW (mean DeltaAUC 72.9+/-22.8 microg/l per min, NS). There were no changes in plasma GH levels after SSIW in OB (mean DeltaAUC 22.8+/-9.7 microg/l per min). In all groups, DeltaAUCs of the GH response to GHRH and after SSIW were highly positively correlated (r=0.7, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These data support the view that a high endogenous GHRH tone, which subsides in the recovery phase of the disease, is present in AN, whereas GHRH hypofunction, possibly associated with pituitary impairment, might indicate OB.     

A paradoxical gender dissociation within the growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor I axis during protracted critical illness

Female gender appears to protect against adverse outcome from prolonged critical illness, a condition characterized by blunted and disorderly GH secretion and impaired anabolism. As a sexual dimorphism in the GH secretory pattern of healthy humans and rodents determines gender differences in metabolism, we here compared GH secretion and responsiveness to GH secretagogues in male and female protracted critically ill patients. GH secretion was quantified by deconvolution analysis and approximate entropy estimates of 9-h nocturnal time series in 9 male and 9 female patients matched for age (mean +/- SD, 67+/-11 and 67+/-15 yr), body mass index, severity and duration of illness, feeding, and medication. Serum concentrations of PRL, TSH, cortisol, and sex steroids were measured concomitantly. Serum levels of GH-binding protein, insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs), and PRL were compared with those of 50 male and 50 female community-living control subjects matched for age and body mass index. In a second study, GH responses to GHRH (1 microg/kg), GH-releasing peptide-2 (GHRP-2; 1 microg/ kg) and GHRH plus GHRP-2 (1 and 1 microg/kg) were examined in comparable, carefully matched male (n = 15) and female (n = 15) patients. Despite identical mean serum GH concentrations, total GH output, GH half-life, and number of GH pulses, critically ill men paradoxically presented with less pulsatile (mean +/- SD pulsatile GH fraction, 39+/-14% vs. 67+/-20%; P = 0.002) and more disorderly (approximate entropy, 0.946+/-0.113 vs. 0.805+/-0.147; P = 0.02) GH secretion than women. Serum IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and acid-labile subunit (ALS) levels were low in patients compared with controls, with male patients revealing lower IGF-I (P = 0.01) and ALS (P = 0.005) concentrations than female patients. Correspondingly, circulating IGF-I and ALS levels correlated positively with pulsatile (but not with nonpulsatile) GH secretion. Circulating levels of GH-binding protein and IGFBP-1, -2, and -6 were higher in patients than controls, without a detectable gender difference. In female patients, PRL levels were 3-fold higher, and TSH and cortisol tended to be higher than levels in males. In both genders, estrogen levels were more than 3-fold higher than normal, and testosterone (2.25+/-1.94 vs. 0.97+/-0.39 nmol/L; P = 0.03) and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate concentrations were low. In male patients, low testosterone levels were related to reduced GH pulse amplitude (r = 0.91; P = 0.0008). GH responses to GHRH were relatively low and equal in critically ill men and women (7.3+/-9.4 vs. 7.8+/-4.1 microg/L; P = 0.99). GH responses to GHRP-2 in women (93+/-38 microg/L) were supranormal and higher (P<0.0001) than those in men (28+/-16 microg/L). Combining GHRH with GHRP-2 nullified this gender difference (77+/-58 in men vs. 120+/-69 microg/L in women; P = 0.4). In conclusion, a paradoxical gender dissociation within the GH/ IGF-I axis is evident in protracted critical illness, with men showing greater loss of pulsatility and regularity within the GH secretory pattern than women (despite indistinguishable total GH output) and concomitantly lower IGF-I and ALS levels. Less endogenous GHRH action in severely ill men compared with women, possibly due to profound hypoandrogenism, accompanying loss of the putative endogenous GHRP-like ligand action with prolonged stress in both genders may explain these novel findings.     

Different effects of short- and long-term recombinant hGH administration on ghrelin and adiponectin levels in GH-deficient adults

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate circulating levels of ghrelin and adiponectin (ApN) in GH-deficient (GHD) adults before and after short- and long-term recombinant human GH (rhGH) administration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients were studied. Seventeen subjects (Group A, 12 men, five women) were evaluated at baseline and after 1 year rhGH therapy (dose mean +/- SD: 0.3 +/- 0.1 mg/day) with the assessment of serum IGF-I, ghrelin, ApN, leptin, insulin and glucose levels, percentage of body fat (BF%), HOMA-IR and QUICKI. Seventeen age-, sex- and body mass index (BMI)-matched healthy subjects were recruited for comparisons. Six patients (Group B, three men, three women) underwent IGF-I generation test (rhGH 0.025 mg/kg/day for 7 days), blood sampled at baseline and on day 8 for determination of IGF-I, ghrelin and ApN levels. RESULTS: Group A: at baseline GHD patients showed low IGF-I levels and BF% significantly higher than controls (31.4 +/- 2.5 vs. 26.4 +/- 1.3, P < 0.05). Glucose, insulin, leptin, tryglicerides, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels, as well as HOMA-IR and QUICKI values were similar in the two series, while total cholesterol levels were higher in GHD. In GHD, ghrelin levels were significantly lower than in controls (193.9 +/- 27.1 vs. 298.1 +/- 32.5 pmol/l, respectively, P = 0.02), while ApN levels were similar (10.2 +/- 1.1 and 9 +/- 1 mg/l, respectively, P = ns). After 1 year of rhGH therapy, BF%, BMI, serum total and LDL cholesterol significantly decreased, serum leptin levels showed a trend to decrease, while HOMA-IR and QUICKI did not change. Ghrelin and ApN levels significantly increased from 193.9 +/- 27.1 to 232.4 +/- 26.3 pmol/l (P < 0.01) and from 8.6 +/- 0.8 to 10.3 +/- 1.1 mg/l (P < 0.05), respectively. In group B, the expected increase in IGF-I levels was associated with a significant decrease in ghrelin levels, while ApN did not change. CONCLUSION: GHD patients showed serum ghrelin lower than controls, probably due to the higher BF%. No difference in ApN was observed. Ghrelin and ApN increments induced by long-term treatment may be related to the significant BMI and BF% reduction that is the predominant metabolic effect of rhGH therapy. Conversely, the decrease in ghrelin levels observed after short-term rhGH administration may be consistent with an inhibitory feedback of GH and/or IGF-I on ghrelin release.     

Endocrine responses to ghrelin in adult patients with isolated childhood-onset growth hormone deficiency

OBJECTIVE: Ghrelin, a 28 amino acid acylated peptide, is a natural ligand of the GH secretagogues (GHS) receptor (GHS-R), which is specific for synthetic GHS. Similar to synthetic GHS, ghrelin strongly stimulates GH secretion but also displays significant stimulatory effects on lactotroph and corticotroph secretion. It has been hypothesized that isolated GH deficiency (GHD) could reflect hypothalamic impairment that would theoretically involve defect in ghrelin activity. PATIENTS: In the present study, we verified the effects of ghrelin (1 microg/kg i.v.) on GH, PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels in adult patients with isolated severe GHD [five males and one female, age (mean +/- SEM) 24.7 +/- 2.6 years, BMI 25.7 +/- 2.7 kg/m2]. In all patients, the GH response to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia (ITT, 0.1 IU regular insulin i.v.) and GH releasing hormone (GHRH) (1 microg/kg i.v.) + arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg i.v.) was also studied. The hormonal responses in GHD were compared with those in age-matched normal subjects (NS, seven males, age 28.6 +/- 2.9 years, BMI 22.1 +/- 0.8 kg/m2). RESULTS: IGF-I levels in GHD were markedly lower than in NS (69.8 +/- 11.3 vs. 167.9 +/- 19.2 microg/l, P < 0.003). Ghrelin administration induced significant increase in GH, PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels in all GHD. In GHD, the GH response to ghrelin was higher (P < 0.05) than that to GHRH + ARG, which, in turn, was higher (P < 0.05) than that to ITT (9.2 +/- 4.1 vs. 5.3 +/- 1.7 vs. 1.4 +/- 0.4 microg/l). These GH (1 microg/l = 2 mU/l) responses in GHD were markedly lower (P < 0.0001) than those in NS (ghrelin vs. GHRH + ARG vs. ITT 92.1 +/- 16.7 vs. 65.3 +/- 8.9 vs. 17.7 +/- 3.5 microg/l). In GHD, the highest individual peak GH response to ghrelin was markedly lower than the lowest peak GH response in NS (28.5 vs. 42.9 microg/l). GHD and NS showed overlapping PRL (1 microg/l = 32 mU/l) (10.0 +/- 1.4 vs. 14.9 +/- 2.2 microg/l), ACTH (22.3 +/- 5.3 vs. 18.7 +/- 4.6 pmol/l) and cortisol responses (598.1 +/- 52.4 vs. 486.9 +/- 38.9 nmol/l). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that ghrelin is one of the most powerful provocative stimuli of GH secretion, even in those patients with isolated severe GHD. In this condition, however, the somatotroph response is markedly reduced while the lactotroph and corticotroph responsiveness to ghrelin is fully preserved, indicating that this endocrine activity is fully independent of mechanisms underlying the GH-releasing effect. These results do not support the hypothesis that ghrelin deficiency is a major cause of isolated GH deficiency but suggest that ghrelin might represent a reliable provocative test to evaluate the maximal GH secretory capacity provided that appropriate cut-off limits are assumed.     

Testosterone blunts feedback inhibition of growth hormone secretion by experimentally elevated insulin-like growth factor-I concentrations

The present study tests the hypothesis that a high dose of testosterone (Te) drives GH and IGF-I production, in part, by blunting autonegative feedback by the end-product peptide. To this end, we infused saline or recombinant human IGF-I (10 microg/kg.h iv for 6 h) in seven healthy men ages 51-72 yr after administration of placebo (Pl) and Te in randomized order. GH release was quantitated fasting before and after injection of GHRH (1 microg/kg). Statistical analyses disclosed that Te vs. Pl: 1) increased the mean concentration of GH from 0.15 +/- 0.045 to 0.48 +/- 0.11 microg/liter (P = 0.007) and IGF-I from 108 +/- 5.0 to 124 +/- 4.1 (P = 0.047) without altering GHRH-induced GH release; 2) elevated the GH nadir from 0.13 +/- 0.03 to 0.23 +/- 0.06 microg/liter (P < 0.05) in the control session and from 0.06 +/- 0.02 to 0.14 +/- 0.04 microg/liter (P = 0.038) during IGF-I infusion; 3) augmented GHRH-stimulated GH release from 3.0 +/- 0.56 (Pl) to 3.7 +/- 0.52 microg/liter (Te) (P < 0.05) during IGF-I infusion; and 4) did not influence estimated IGF-I kinetics. In summary, supplementation of a high dose of Te in middle-aged and older men attenuates IGF-I feedback-dependent inhibition of nadir and peak GH secretion. Both effects of Te differ from those reported recently for estradiol in postmenopausal women. Accordingly, we postulate that Te and estrogen modulate IGF-I negative feedback differentially.     

Diagnostic reliability of a single IGF-I measurement in 237 adults with total anterior hypopituitarism and severe GH deficiency

OBJECTIVE: Within an appropriate clinical context, GH deficiency (GHD) in adults must be demonstrated biochemically by a single provocative test. Insulin-induced hypoglycaemia (ITT) and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) + arginine (ARG) are indicated as the tests of choice, provided that appropriate cut-off limits are defined. Although IGF-I is the best marker of GH secretory status, its measurement is not considered a reliable diagnostic tool. In fact, considerable overlap between GHD and normal subjects is present, at least when patients with suspected GHD are considered independently of the existence of other anterior pituitary defects. Considering the time and cost associated with provocative testing procedures, we aimed to re-evaluate the diagnostic power of IGF-I measurement. DESIGN: To this goal, in a large population [n = 237, 139 men, 98 women, age range 20-80 years, body mass index (BMI) range 26.4 +/- 4.3 kg/m2] of well-nourished adults with total anterior pituitary deficit including severe GHD (as shown by a GH peak below the 1st centile limit of normal response to GHRH + ARG tests and/or ITT) we evaluated the diagnostic value of a single total IGF-I measurement. IGF-I levels in hypopituitary patients were evaluated based on age-related normative values in a large population of normal subjects (423 ns, 144 men and 279 women, age range 20-80 years, BMI range 18.2-24.9 kg/m2). RESULTS: Mean IGF-I levels in GHD were lower than those in normal subjects in each decade, but not the oldest one (74.4 +/- 48.9 vs. 243.9 +/- 86.7 micro g/l for 20-30 years; 81.8 +/- 46.5 vs. 217.2 +/- 56.9 micro g/l for 31-40 years; 85.8 +/- 42.1 vs. 168.5 +/- 69.9 micro g/l for 41-50 years; 82.3 +/- 39.3 vs. 164.3 +/- 60.3 micro g/l for 51-60 years; 67.5 +/- 31.8 vs. 123.9 +/- 50.0 micro g/l for 61-70 years; P < 0.0001; 54.3 +/- 33.6 vs. 91.6 +/- 53.5 micro g/l for 71-80 years, P = ns). Individual IGF-I levels in GHD were below the age-related 3rd and 25th centile limits in 70.6% and 97.63% of patients below 40 years and in 34.9% and 77.8% of the remaining patients up to the 8th decade, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Total IGF-I levels are often normal even in patients with total anterior hypopituitarism but this does not rule out severe GHD that therefore ought to be verified by provocative testing of GH secretion. However, despite the low diagnostic sensitivity of this parameter, very low levels of total IGF-I can be considered definitive evidence of severe GHD in a remarkable percentage of total anterior hypopituitary patients who could therefore skip provocative testing of GH secretion.     

Hexarelin-induced growth hormone response in short stature. Comparison with growth hormone-releasing hormone plus pyridostigmine and arginine plus estrogen.

Hexarelin (HEX) is a synthetic hexapeptide with strong GH-stimulating activity. We evaluated GH response (expressed as maximum value after stimulus [Cmax] and as area under the curve [AUC]) to HEX at the doses of 1 microg/kg i.v. (HEX 1) and 2 microg/kg i.v. (HEX 2), in comparison with the responses to GHRH (1 microg/kg i.v.) + pyridostigmine (PD, 60 mg po) and to arginine (ARG, 0.5 mg/kg i.v.) + ethinylestradiol (EE, 1 mg/day po for 3 days before the stimulation), in 5 subjects with familial short stature (FSS), 11 with constitutional growth delay (CGD), 6 with GH neurosecretory dysfunction (NSD), and 5 with isolated growth hormone deficiency (GHD). Cmax and AUC after HEX 1 were 26.8+/-10.5 ng/ml and 1448+/-514 ng/min x ml in FSS, 23.6+/-14.4 ng/ml and 1146+/-750 ng/min x ml in CGD, 36.9+/-21.5 ng/ml and 2048+/-1288 ng/min x ml in NSD, 9.4+/-5.8 ng/ml and 498+/-200 ng/min x ml in GHD (Cmax and AUC in FSS and CGD, p<0.05 vs GHD). Cmax and AUC after HEX 2 were 37.7+/-16 ng/ml and 1979+/-888 ng/min x ml in FSS, 32.5+/-16.2 ng/ml and 1613+/-237 ng/min x ml in CGD, 39.7+/-20.7 ng/ml and 2366+/-1569 ng/min xml in NSD, 13.4+/-4.2 ng/ml and 645+/-293 ng/min x ml in GHD (Cmax in FSS, CGD and NSD p<0.01 vs GHD; AUC in NSD, p<05 vs GHD). Cmax and AUC after GHRH+/-PD were 46.6+/-8.8 ng/ml and 3294+/-1031 ng/min x ml in FSS, 25.9+/-11.2 ng/ml and 1464+/-735 ng/min x ml in CGD, 38.8+/-21.7 ng/ml and 2428+/-1399 ng/min x ml in NSD, 8.4+/-6.2 ng/ml and 685+/-572 ng/min x ml in GHD (Cmax and AUC in FSS, p<0.001 vs CGD and GHD; Cmax in CGD and NSD, p<0.001 vs GHD). Cmax and AUC after ARG+EE were 21.3+/-4.2 ng/ml and 1432+/-514 ng/min x ml in FSS, 14.8+/-10 ng/ml and 805+/-489 ng/min x ml in CGD, 22.2+/-12.8 ng/ml and 1199+/-309 ng/min x ml in NSD, 4.6+/-2.5 ng/ml and 247+/-191 ng/min x ml in GHD (Cmax and AUC in FSS, CGD and NSD, p<0.01 vs GHD). Specificity was 62% for HEX 1 and 75% for HEX 2, GHRH+PD and ARG+EE. From a diagnostic point of view, HEX 1 + HEX 2 was the association with the largest percentage of false positives (20% in FSS, 27% in CGD and 33% in NSD), HEX 1 +GHRH+PD resulted in 9% in CGD, while the combined use of HEX 1 or HEX 2 with GHRH+PD or ARG+EE and of GHRH+PD with ARG+EE did not show false positive responses. In conclusion: I) the most effective dose of HEX was 2 microg/kg i.v.; 2) HEX did not show more specificity than GHRH+PD and ARG+EE; 3) the association of GHRH+PD with ARG+EE could yield the best results at lower costs, confirming these tests as first-line tools in evaluating GH secretion.