Common bile duct stones: the role of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative ERCP

The indications for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to demonstrate the presence of common bile duct stones has changed in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Preoperative ERCP is indicated when there is strong evidence of common bile duct stones, ie, jaundice, cholangitis, ultrasound demonstration of a common bile duct stone, and specific enzyme elevations. Preoperative ERCP is not indicated in mild gallstone pancreatitis. ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy as the only treatment regimen is successful in elderly patients with severe comorbid illness who have gallstones and common bile duct stones. Intraoperative ERCP does not play a role in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Transcystic common duct stone removal or laparoscopic choledochotomy is becoming the approach to common duct stones demonstrated by intraoperative cholangiography. Postoperative ERCP is indicated when intraoperative removal of common bile duct stones is unsuccessful. It is important to note that magnetic resonance cholangiography will play an increasing role and will reduce the indications and frequency of the use of ERCP.     

The theory of ''persisting'' common bile duct stones in severe gallstone pancreatitis.

There have been uncertainties as to the role of common bile duct (CBD) stones in severe gallstone pancreatitis. In order to resolve this, ERCP findings in 131 patients with acute pancreatitis were compared with predicted severity, clinical course and final outcome. Significant associations were found between 'persisting' CBD stones, coincidental acute cholangitis, predicted severity and actual outcome. There was evidence for acute obstruction of both the CBD and the pancreatic duct by CBD stones. The theory was therefore proposed that small migrating stones tend to initiate the attack, whereas larger 'persisting' stones tend to convert a mild attack into a severe attack. This hypothesis resolves previously irreconcilable theories and lends support to the use of urgent endoscopic sphincterotomy for treatment, but only in cases predicted to be severe.     

Endoscopic sphincterotomy in acute gallstone pancreatitis: a prospective study of the late outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the outcome after acute biliary pancreatitis in patients treated during the acute attack by endoscopic sphincterotomy without cholecystectomy. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: University hospital, Norway. SUBJECTS: 130 patients with gallstones and acute pancreatitis. In 62 patients with common bile duct stones the bile duct was cleared by sphincterotomy and stone extraction. The remaining 68 patients had prophylactic sphincterotomy. Cholecystectomy was not planned later. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of recurrent acute pancreatitis and need for cholecystectomy. RESULTS: 21 patients were dead or not available for the follow-up. Consequently 109 patients were followed-up for a median of 39 months (range 23-62). One patient had recurrent pancreatitis. 20 patients had a cholecystectomy later for symptoms related to gallstone disease. Of the rest, 25 patients had moderate or mild gallstone-related symptoms. There was no difference in gallstone-related symptoms between those who had had stones in the bile duct and those who had not. 63 patients had no symptoms related to gallstones. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic sphincterotomy during or immediately after acute gallstone pancreatitis resulted in half the patients being free of symptoms during the next three years.     

Changes in biliary bacteria after endoscopic cholangiography and sphincterotomy.

This prospective study consisted of 32 patients. In each patient, bile was collected during two separate endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies (ERCP) to study changes in biliary bacteriology and cytology. The mean interval between ERCPs was 20 months (15-29 months). Twenty-three patients had gallstones in the gallbladder, bile ducts, or both. Nineteen of them had bactibilia compared to none of the 9 patients with normal ERCP (P less than 0.001). Fifteen patients had normal bile ducts in ERCP (Group 1). Four of these patients (27%) had bactibilia initially and 9 (60%) at follow-up (P = 0.069). Seventeen patients had bile duct stones and underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy (Group II). Fifteen of these patients (88%) had bactibilia initially, and 15 (88%) also had bactibilia at follow-up. Initially, anaerobic bacteria were detected in 37 per cent of Group I patients with bactibilia and in 50 per cent of Group II patients with bactibilia. At follow-up, the bile in Group I patients infrequently (11%) contained anaerobes, whereas in Group II patients anaerobes predominated (67%; P less than 0.011). Clear correlation between the biliary cytology and bacteriology could not be observed. The authors conclude that ERCP may result in increased incidence of long-term bactibilia and suggest that contamination occurred during ERCP. The bactibilia associated with bile duct stones does not subside after endoscopic treatment of the common duct stones.     

内镜下胆总管取石后胆囊切除治疗胆总管继发结石

目的 观察内镜下胆总管取石后单纯行胆囊切除,避免胆总管探查,Ｔ管引流对胆囊结石、胆总管继发结石患者治疗的安全性和有效性。方法 ３７例胆囊结石、胆总管继发结石的患者在常规行ＥＲＣＰ检查的同时行内镜下胆总管取石（必要时行ＥＰＴ、液电碎石术）,财生胆囊切除。结果 （１）胆总管结石直径在１．５ｃｍ以内者２７例,内镜下１００％成功取净结石。１０例胆总管结石直径在１．５￣３．０ｃｍ之间者经液电碎石后取净结石８     

The use of ERCP in the management of common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Summary The purpose of this study was to evaluate the indications and results of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for gallstone disease since the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In our personal series of 410 consecutive cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, we found 17 common bile duct (CBD) stones; seven were identified by preop ERCP, nine at laparoscopy by intraoperative cholangiography, and one postop by ERCP. We have performed preop ERCP in 21 patients (5.1%); CBD stones were found in seven. Our indications for preop ERCP were elevated liver function tests, dilatation of the common duct by ultrasound, or a history of jaundice/pancreatitis, and all stones were successfully removed by endoscopic sphincterotomy. At laparoscopic cholecystectomy nine patients were found to have stones; one was treated with laparoscopic methods, four with open CBD exploration, and four by postop endoscopic sphincterotomy. Post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy, five patients underwent ERCP for pain or increased liver function tests suggestive of common duct stones. One of the five was found to have stones and these were successfully removed by endoscopic sphincterotomy. ERCP is very useful as a diagnostic and therapeutic modality in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients with suspected CBD stones. Elevated liver function tests and dilated CBD by ultrasound are the most accurate predictors of stones. Endoscopic sphincterotomy is a more effective route, at present, for stone removal than a laparoscopic approach.     

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for surgeons

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography remains an important tool for the management of biliary and pancreatic disease. Endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones is the procedure of choice for retained stones and is a common option preoperatively with the gallbladder in place. Cholangitis is best treated by endoscopic sphincterotomy and stenting along with intravenous antibiotics initially with the possibility of definitive treatment with endoscopic stone removal and/or dilatation and stenting for strictures. Endoscopic sphincterotomy is also recommended in severe or rapidly worsening gallstone pancreatitis or in those with combined pancreatitis and rising bilirubin or cholangitis. Palliation with internal stents for malignant strictures has been possible with good outcome and very little difference in efficacy, complications, mortality, and long-term survival compared to surgical treatment. Biliary fistulae are easily treated by endoscopic stenting, particularly when the source is the cystic or an accessory duct. Benign biliary strictures can be dilated and stented for prolonged periods with good long-term success in selected cases. Pancreatic stenting is useful to treat pancreatic duct strictures and duct hypertension with considerable improvement of pain. Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst appears to be a safe, effective, and definitive treatment for patients in whom anatomic considerations allow its use. In summary, therapeutic uses of ERCP are of broad interest to the general surgeon and should be understood and utilized appropriately by the surgical community.     

Emergency cholecystostomy and subsequent cholecystectomy for acute gallstone cholecystitis in the elderly

BACKGROUND: The morbidity and mortality rates associated with acute cholecystitis are higher in the elderly. This study reports the results of treatment of acute cholecystitis in the elderly with emergency ultrasonographically guided percutaneous cholecystostomy followed by elective cholecystectomy after endoscopic treatment of any common bile duct stones diagnosed by percutaneous cholangiography. METHODS: From January 1989 to December 1998, 92 patients aged over 70 years were treated for acute gallstone cholecystitis. A group of 84 patients with ultrasonographic signs of severe cholecystitis or an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of II to IV were submitted to ultrasonographically guided percutaneous cholecystostomy. Transcatheter cholangiography was performed in all patients and endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed before operation in patients with common bile duct stones. After resolution of the acute phase and treatment of any associated diseases, patients were submitted to cholecystectomy. RESULTS: Cholecystostomy was performed successfully in 83 patients and permitted resolution of the acute attack in all after a mean period of 1.8 days. Cholangiography yielded a diagnosis of non-gallstone obstruction in one patient and common bile duct stones in 19 patients; preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction was performed in 18 patients. Elective cholecystectomy was then performed in 70 patients with no deaths and a morbidity rate of 24 per cent. CONCLUSION: Combining emergency ultrasonographically guided percutaneous cholecystostomy, preoperative endoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones and subsequent elective cholecystectomy constitutes an optimal treatment regimen for acute gallstone cholecystitis in selected elderly patients with a mortality rate of zero in the authors' experience.     

What is involved in endoscopic sphincterotomy for gallstones?

This study reports our first year's experience of endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones. Forty patients were considered for the procedure and it was attempted in 37. An effective endoscopic sphincterotomy was eventually achieved in 32 (86 cases per cent), 7 after a "pre-cut". Twenty-three patients passed stones spontaneously (72 per cent), 6 could not be reassessed and 3 still had stones present (9 per cent). Bed occupancy was 9.5 +/- 5.9 days. Complications occurred in 30 per cent, the most common being pancreatitis in 6 cases with 1 death. It is concluded that endoscopic sphincterotomy offers a valuable alternative to surgery in the management of common bile duct stones.     

腹腔镜联合内镜逆行胰胆管造影术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床体会

目的:探讨内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography,ERCP)联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的最佳组合方式。方法:回顾分析2007年1月至2012年11月为203例胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者行ERCP+内镜乳头括约肌切开术(endoscopic sphincterotomy,EST)联合LC的临床资料。其中138例先行ERCP+EST取出胆总管结石,再行LC(ERCP+LC组);65例先行LC再行ERCP+EST(LC+ERCP组)。对比分析两组手术成功率、总住院时间及并发症情况。结果:两组均无穿孔、出血及重症胰腺炎等严重并发症发生。ERCP+LC组住院时间短[(7.2±2.1)d vs.(8.1±1.9)d],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。ERCP+LC组术后胆管残余结石4例,发生急性轻型胰腺炎1例、胆管炎1例,并发症发生率为4.3%;低于LC+ERCP组的12.3%(P<0.05)。结论:对于胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的患者,先行ERCP+EST取石,再行LC,手术并发症较少,住院时间短,是较理想的组合方式。     

Treatment of common bile duct stones using mono-octanoin.

A retrospective analysis of 48 patients undergoing mono-octanoin infusion via nasobiliary catheter following failure of endoscopic extraction of common bile duct stones is reported. Among 35 patients who received a complete course of treatment, nine (26 per cent) had duct clearance by the completion of the infusion and a further eight on subsequent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (total 49 per cent). Two patients had a successful stone extraction after enlargement of the sphincterotomy (total non-surgical clearance rate 54 per cent). None of five patients with stones greater than 2 cm in diameter had stone clearance at the completion of the infusion and only one at subsequent ERCP. Among 13 patients receiving an incomplete course of treatment seven had clear ducts on repeat ERCP (54 per cent). Mono-octanoin infusion via a nasobiliary catheter is of limited value in the management of this difficult group of patients, although it may be successful in some.     

腹腔镜下经腹顺行牵引法内镜气囊鼻胆管引流术231例

目的探讨腹腔镜下经腹顺行牵引法内镜气囊鼻胆管引流术(laparoscopic endoscopic balloon nasobiliary drainage,LENBD)的临床应用体会。方法回顾性分析我院2010年4月至2016年9月期间,符合入选标准的231例胆囊结石、胆总管结石合并十二指肠乳头部梗阻或狭窄患者在腹腔镜胆总管探查术中施行LENBD的临床资料。结果腹腔镜下成功切除胆囊231例。胆管镜取石并留置鼻胆管80.9%(187/231),胆管镜联合十二指肠镜取石并留置鼻胆管11.3%(26/231),胆管镜取石联合十二指肠镜乳头切开并行直接一期缝合术2.6%(6/231),因胆总管残石并腹腔镜下留置T形管2.2%(5/231),因乳头狭窄未解除留置鼻胆管失败并腹腔镜下留置输尿管导管0.4%(1/231),因十二指肠镜插入胆道失败而直接行一期缝合术0.9%(2/231),因胆总管过细且胆道镜和十二指肠镜取石均失败而放弃胆总管探查取石术0.4%(1/231),因腹腔镜下取石失败而中转为开腹胆总管探查取石术并留置鼻胆管1.3%(3/231)。鼻胆管引流术后发现残石2例(0.9%),胆汁漏6例(2.6%),轻症胰腺炎3例(1.3%),腹腔内出血再手术1例(0.4%)。无肠穿孔、胆管穿孔、重症胰腺炎等并发症,无死亡病例。术后总并发症发生率为5.2%(12/231)。结论从本医院有限病例进行初步研究发现,只要病例选择合适,在腹腔镜胆总管探查术中联合LENBD治疗胆囊结石、胆总管结石合并十二指肠乳头部梗阻或狭窄是可行、有效和安全的。     

Acute biliary pancreatitis: Diagnosis and management

Acute biliary pancreatitis is a serious complication of biliary calculous disease and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis has been the focus of discussion in recent years. In addition, the exact role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis has not yet been fully defined. In this report, we evaluated a protocol of emergency ERCP (within 24 hours) for predicted severe attacks, early ERCP (within 72 hours) for predicted mild attacks, and interval LC for management of acute biliary pancreatitis. Between January 1992 and June 1995 a total of 75 patients with acute biliary pancreatitis were managed according to the protocol. Bedside ultrasonography at admission diagnosed 94% of all 64 patients with gallbladder stones, but the sensitivity of visualizing choledocholithiasis was low (19%). Forty-five (60%) of them were predicted to have a severe attack by either Ranson or glucose/urea criteria. Emergency ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) for identifiable common bile duct (CBD) or ampullary stones were performed on all patients predicted to have a severe attack within 24 hours from presentation. An early endoscopic procedure was performed on all patients predicted to have a mild attack within 72 hours from presentation. ERCP was successful in 95% of all patients, and CBD stones were detected in 52 (69%) of them. ES and stone clearance were successful in all of these 52 patients. The morbidity associated with the endoscopic procedure was 3%, and there were no deaths. All except one patient survived the attack of acute pancreatitis, resulting in an overall mortality of 1%. Interval LC was performed on 46 patients with a conversion rate of 4%. The median postoperative hospital stay after LC was 2 days, and there was no major intraoperative or postoperative morbidity or mortality. Our experience suggests that the policy of emergency ERCP for patients with predicted severe disease, early ERCP for patients with predicted mild disease, and interval LC are associated with favorable outcomes in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis. Acute biliary pancreatitis can be managed safely and effectively by a combined endoscopic and laparoscopic approach.     

The role of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the management of patients with gallstone pancreatitis

OBJECTIVE: To examine the utility of magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) in the preoperative evaluation of patients with gallstone pancreatitis. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Gallstone pancreatitis is often associated with the presence of common bile duct (CBD) stones that may require endoscopic removal prior to planned laparoscopic cholecystectomy. No reliable clinical criteria exist, however, that can accurately predict CBD stones and the need for preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). METHODS: Sixty-four patients were identified with gallstone pancreatitis based on clinical presentation and imaging studies over a three-and-a-half-year period. All patients underwent MRC, and the images were evaluated for gallstones, CBD stones, cholecystitis, and pancreatitis RESULTS: Seventeen of the 64 patients (27%) with gallstone pancreatitis were found to have CBD stones confirmed by ERCP. MRC correctly predicted CBD stones in 16 of the 17 patients (sensitivity = 94%). In 1 additional patient, MRC demonstrated CBD stones not seen at ERCP, consistent with probable passage. By comparison, the sensitivities of other criteria for predicting CBD stones were (1) elevated bilirubin >or=2.0 mg/dL = 65%; (2) dilated duct on ultrasound = 55%; and (3) CBD stones on ultrasound = 27%. MRC was able to visualize gallbladder stones in 57 of 62 patients (94%) and correctly predicted acute cholecystitis in 6 of 8 patients. MRC also detected peripancreatic edema and inflammatory changes consistent with acute pancreatitis in 45 of 64 patients (70%). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that MRC can accurately identify CBD stones preoperatively in patients with gallstone pancreatitis and provide valuable information with respect to other biliary pathology, including cholelithiasis, acute cholecystitis, and pancreatitis. MRC is an effective noninvasive screening tool for CBD stones, appropriately selecting candidates for preoperative ERCP and sparing others the need for an endoscopic procedure with its associated complications.     

Endoscopic sphincterotomy and removal of pancreatic duct stones

Chronic pancreatitis may be associated with pancreatic duct dilatation and ductal stones. Such stones are undoubtedly the result of chronic pancreatitis and stasis within the ductal system and may themselves serve to exacerbate ductal obstruction and recurrent episodes of pancreatitis. Endoscopic sphincterotomy has been used to relieve common duct obstruction secondary to biliary stones. This report suggests that sphincterotomy may also be used to approach selected patients who have pancreatic duct stones and recurrent pancreatitis. The technique involves a preliminary ERCP followed by standard endoscopic sphincterotomy with the papillatome positioned in the bile duct. A balloon catheter is then directed into the pancreatic duct orifice to extract ductal calculi. Although the main duct may be cleared, side branches are more difficult, and perhaps unnecessary, to clear. This method has provided relief of pain in a limited series of patients and may mark the beginning of a more aggressive approach to pancreatic endoscopy.     

The biliary tract in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis

The biliary tract has been prospectively studied in a consecutive series of 769 patients undergoing surgery for gallstones to determine whether differences exist between subjects with and without a history of acute pancreatitis. The incidence of acute gallstone pancreatitis (AGP) was 7.7 per cent and men with gallstones were significantly more likely to develop pancreatic inflammation. Operations on patients with AGP were accompanied by a higher mortality rate which was almost entirely due to the severity of the disease at the time of surgery. The earlier operations were performed after the onset of pancreatitis the more often stones were found in the common bile duct and at the ampulla. Patients with AGP had smaller and more numerous gallbladder stones in association with a wider cystic duct that controls. The common bile duct diameter in patients with AGP was independent of the presence of choledochal calculi implying either previous temporary obstruction to the biliary tree or a dilated duct ab initio. Pancreatic duct reflux was far more commonly observed on the cholangiograms of patients with AGP and in these patients reflux occurred into a wider pancreatic duct, at a greater angle and was associated with a longer functioning common channel. No patient developed recurrent pancreatitis following biliary surgery. These features strongly support the concept of gallstone migration and suggest that patients with gallstones who develop acute pancreatitis have essential differences in their biliary tree which mechanically facilitate migration of calculi.     

Rendezvous technique versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography to treat bile duct stones reduces endoscopic time and pancreatic damage

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic procedures on Vater's papilla are related to pancreatic damage with or without pathologic increase of pancreatic enzymes. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with endoscopic sphincterotomy is a standard treatment for common bile duct stones, performed sequentially before or after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The "rendezvous" (RV) procedure combines laparoscopic cholecystectomy, intra-operative cholangiography, and endoscopic bile duct clearance and is an alternative to the sequential treatment. We tried to analyze relevant differences between the two options concerning the main parameters of pancreatic damage. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients treated for biliary stones were divided into two groups of 19 patients depending on the type of treatment (RV vs. ERCP) and were compared for post-procedural amylase and lipase levels; the duration of the endoscopic procedures, effectiveness, and complications were also recorded. RESULTS: A pathologic increase of serum amylase occurred in 15.7% of the RV group and 47.3% of the ERCP group with significant differences regarding amylase levels in the 6- and 66-hour samples (p < 0.003; p < 0.006). The mean duration of endoscopic procedure was significantly shorter in the RV group (17 vs. 26 minutes, p < 0.0001). RV was effective in common bile duct clearance in 100% of cases, while ERCP was effective in only 89.5%. Minor morbidity affected one patient in each group. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report comparing combined laparoendoscopic RV versus ERCP for potential pancreatic damage and showing that RV reduces the number of patients with an iatrogenic pathologic increase of amylase when compared to ERCP, and also significantly reduces the duration of endoscopic procedure.     

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in conjunction with laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Summary Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the primary surgical treatment for symptomatic cholelithiasis. In conjunction with the dramatic rise in LC there has been an increase in the number of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies (ERCPs) performed. For this study, the records of patients referred to the surgical endoscopy department between January 1991 and February 1992 were reviewed. Seventy-seven ERCPs were performed in conjunction with LC. The indications for ERCP included jaundice or a history of jaundice, gallstone pancreatitis, a suspicious filling defect on either ultrasound or intraoperative cholangiogram, abnormal liver function tests, cholangitis, or postoperative bile leak. Sixty-two procedures were performed prior to LC and 15 procedures after LC. Forty-two patients were female (54.5%) and the patients ages ranged from 14 to 92 years (mean 54.1 years). Of the 62 patients having ERCP preoperatively 35 patients (56.5%) had no evidence of common bile duct (CBD) stones and underwent LC as planned. Twenty-three patients were found to have CBD stones, of which six were referred for an open cholecystectomy and CBD exploration, because of large multiple CBD stones or the presence of a large duodenal diverticulum. Seventeen patients had their CBD cleared endoscopically, and four patients were not successfully cannulated.Fifteen patients had ERCP after LC. There were two patients with CBD injuries who were referred for surgical correction. Two patients had leakage from the cystic duct stump, and four patients had CBD stones, all of whom were successfully treated with endoscopic sphincterotomy. There were four patients who had a normal postoperative ERCP and two patients who could not have their CBD cannulated.There were no mortalities, but there were four cases of complications. Two patients had bleeding after stone extractions, and they required blood transfusions. One patient developed cholangitis from stenosis of the papilla after an endoscopic sphincterotomy, and one patient developed pancreatitis which resolved with conservative treatment. There is an increasing role for ERCP and sphincterotomy in patients undergoing LC. ERCP carries an inherent morbidity and therefore routine ERCP is not justified. However, with the proper suspicion of CBD stones a preoperative ERCP is indicated prior to a planned laparoscopic cholecystectomy.     

Preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is not necessary in mild gallstone pancreatitis

Background: The role of preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in gallstone pancreatitis is unclear. Therefore, we designed a study to establish whether ERCP is indicated in these cases. Method: We studied 55 patients who had been admitted with gallstone pancreatitis. All of them had mild pancreatitis (Ranson's criteria <3). ERCP was carried out within 4 days of admission, once the liver function tests and serum amylase had returned to normal levels. Results: ERCP did not demonstrate common bile duct stones in any of the patients. All patients then underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the same admission. Conclusion: Preoperative ERCP is not indicated for patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis. Received: 9 June 1998/Accepted: 7 March 1999     

Prospective analysis of a scoring system to predict choledocholithiasis

BACKGROUND: The management of choledocholithiasis in the laparoscopic era remains debatable. A common policy is to perform preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) on patients suspected of having common bile duct (CBD) stones, using standard risk criteria. The aim of this study was to evaluate prospectively a scoring system designed to improve the accuracy of CBD stone prediction before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: Known clinical, biochemical and radiological risk factors for CBD stones were analysed retrospectively in 233 patients. The presence (n = 77) or absence (n = 156) of CBD stones was determined by preoperative ERCP and/or laparoscopic cholangiography. Using multivariate analysis, the significant risk factors for CBD stones were identified and a new preoperative scoring system was developed. A score of 3 or more was taken as the cut-off point to suggest CBD stones and the need for preoperative ERCP. This scoring system was then tested prospectively in 211 consecutive patients with symptomatic gallstones requiring surgery. Patients whose bile ducts could not be demonstrated by ERCP or operative cholangiography were excluded. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients scored 3 or more (predicted ERCP rate of 29 per cent), of whom 23 (42 per cent) had proven CBD stones. Intraoperative cholangiography was successful in 87 per cent. Five patients (4 per cent) who scored less than 3 had small stones (less than 5 mm) demonstrated at operative cholangiography. The overall sensitivity and specificity of this scoring were 82 and 80 per cent respectively. CONCLUSION: Formal risk assessment of the presence of CBD stones using this scoring system is simple and may be used for preoperative selection of patients for biliary tract imaging by magnetic resonance cholangiography or ERCP.